1
|
In prostatic transition zone lesions (PI-RADS v2.1): which subgroup should be biopsied? THE EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE 2021. [DOI: 10.1186/s43055-021-00543-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) score 3 transition zone (TZ) lesions between Prostate Imaging and Reporting Data System (PI-RADS) v2.1 and modified PI-RADS v2.1-B.
Results
Among TZ lesions (n = 78), 47 (60.0%) had T2WI score of 3, and 16 of the 47 (34.0%) were malignant. The rate of malignancy was 8.8% in PI-RADS category 3A, 100% in PI-RADS category 3B, and 100% in PI-RADS category 4. The apparent diffusion coefficient value of PI-RADS category 3B (0.934 ± 0.158 × 10−3 mm2/s) showed significant difference with that of PI-RADS category 3A (1.098 ± 0.146 × 10−3 mm2/s) but none with PI-RADS category 4 (0.821 ± 0.091 × 10−3 mm2/s). There was no significant difference in the sensitivity and negative predictive value of PI-RADS v2.1 and PI-RADS v2.1-B. Specificity and positive predictive value of modified PI-RADS v2.1-B were much higher than those of PI-RADS v2.1 for both readers (p < .001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve tended to be higher with PI-RADS v2.1-B than with PI-RADS v2.1.
Conclusion
Biopsy for PI-RADS 3B lesion is necessary due to its superior malignancy potential than that of PI-RADS 3A lesion.
Collapse
|
2
|
Coronary artery disease imaging reporting and data system (CAD-RADS): what radiologists need to know? Emerg Radiol 2021; 28:1185-1203. [PMID: 34387783 DOI: 10.1007/s10140-021-01973-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this work is to review Coronary Artery Disease Imaging Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) that was designed to standardize reporting language and improve the communication of data among radiologists and clinicians. Stenotic lesions are graded into 5 grades ranging from 0 (no stenosis) to 5 (total occlusion), where the highest grade represents the final score. The expert consensus platform has added 4 special modifiers (non-diagnostic, stent, graft, and vulnerability) to aid patient management through linking these scores with decision algorithm and treatment plan. Adherence to standard imaging protocol; knowledge of normal, variant, and anomalous anatomy; and skillful evaluation of stenosis are important for proper utilization of this reporting system. Lastly, radiologists should be aware of the inherited benefits, limitations, and common pitfalls of this classification system.
Collapse
|
3
|
Giganti F, Kasivisvanathan V, Kirkham A, Punwani S, Emberton M, Moore CM, Allen C. Prostate MRI quality: a critical review of the last 5 years and the role of the PI-QUAL score. Br J Radiol 2021; 95:20210415. [PMID: 34233502 PMCID: PMC8978249 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
There is increasing interest in the use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in the prostate cancer pathway. The European Association of Urology (EAU) and the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) now advise mpMRI prior to biopsy, and the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) recommendations set out the minimal technical requirements for the acquisition of mpMRI of the prostate.The widespread and swift adoption of this technique has led to variability in image quality. Suboptimal image acquisition reduces the sensitivity and specificity of mpMRI for the detection and staging of clinically significant prostate cancer.This critical review outlines the studies aimed at improving prostate MR quality that have been published over the last 5 years. These span from the use of specific MR sequences, magnets and coils to patient preparation. The rates of adherence of prostate mpMRI to technical standards in different cohorts across the world are also discussed.Finally, we discuss the first standardised scoring system (i.e., Prostate Imaging Quality, PI-QUAL) that has been created to evaluate image quality, although further iterations of this score are expected in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Giganti
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Veeru Kasivisvanathan
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alex Kirkham
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Shonit Punwani
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mark Emberton
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Caroline M Moore
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Clare Allen
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Razek AAKA, El-Diasty T, Elhendy A, Fahmy D, El-Adalany MA. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS): What the radiologists need to know? Clin Imaging 2021; 79:183-200. [PMID: 34098371 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.05.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
We aim to review the new modifications in MR imaging technique, image interpretation, lexicon, and scoring system of the last version of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1 (PI-RADS v2.1) in a simple and practical way. This last version of PI-RADS v2.1 describes the new technical modifications in the protocol of Multiparametric MRI (MpMRI) including T2, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) parameters. It includes also; new guidelines in the image interpretation specifications in new locations (lesions located in the central zone and anterior fibromuscular stroma), clarification of T2 scoring of lesions of the transition zone, the distinction between DWI score 2 and 3 lesions in the transition zone and peripheral zone, as well as between positive and negative enhancement in DCE. Biparametric MRI (BpMRI) along with simplified PI-RADS is gaining more acceptances in the assessment of clinically significant prostatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tarek El-Diasty
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mansoura Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Ahmed Elhendy
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mansoura Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Dalia Fahmy
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura, Egypt
| | | |
Collapse
|