1
|
Barreto EF, Chitre PN, Pine KH, Shepel KK, Rule AD, Alshaer MH, Abdul Aziz MH, Roberts JA, Scheetz MH, Ausman SE, Moreland-Head LN, Rivera CG, Jannetto PJ, Mara KC, Boehmer KR. Why is the Implementation of Beta-Lactam Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for the Critically Ill Falling Short? A Multicenter Mixed-Methods Study. Ther Drug Monit 2023; 45:508-518. [PMID: 37076424 PMCID: PMC10348918 DOI: 10.1097/ftd.0000000000001059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/02/2022] [Indexed: 04/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Beta-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring (BL TDM; drug level testing) can facilitate improved outcomes in critically ill patients. However, only 10%-20% of hospitals have implemented BL TDM. This study aimed to characterize provider perceptions and key considerations for successfully implementing BL TDM. METHODS This was a sequential mixed-methods study from 2020 to 2021 of diverse stakeholders at 3 academic medical centers with varying degrees of BL TDM implementation (not implemented, partially implemented, and fully implemented). Stakeholders were surveyed, and a proportion of participants completed semistructured interviews. Themes were identified, and findings were contextualized with implementation science frameworks. RESULTS Most of the 138 survey respondents perceived that BL TDM was relevant to their practice and improved medication effectiveness and safety. Integrated with interview data from 30 individuals, 2 implementation themes were identified: individual internalization and organizational features. Individuals needed to internalize, make sense of, and agree to BL TDM implementation, which was positively influenced by repeated exposure to evidence and expertise. The process of internalization appeared more complex with BL TDM than with other antibiotics (ie, vancomycin). Organizational considerations relevant to BL TDM implementation (eg, infrastructure, personnel) were similar to those identified in other TDM settings. CONCLUSIONS Broad enthusiasm for BL TDM among participants was found. Prior literature suggested that assay availability was the primary barrier to implementation; however, the data revealed many more individual and organizational attributes, which impacted the BL TDM implementation. Internalization should particularly be focused on to improve the adoption of this evidence-based practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pooja N. Chitre
- School for the Future of Innovation in Society, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
| | - Kathleen H. Pine
- College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ
| | | | - Andrew D. Rule
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
- Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Mohammad H. Alshaer
- Infectious Disease Pharmacokinetics Lab, Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Mohd Hafiz Abdul Aziz
- University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research (UQCCR), Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Australia
| | - Jason A. Roberts
- University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research (UQCCR), Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Australia
| | - Marc H. Scheetz
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Chicago College of Pharmacy, Midwestern University, Downers Grove, IL
- Pharmacometrics Center of Excellence, Midwestern University, Downers Grove, IL
| | - Sara E. Ausman
- Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic Health System, Eau Claire, WI
| | | | | | - Paul J. Jannetto
- Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Kristin C. Mara
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Kasey R. Boehmer
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
- Division of Health Care Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ewoldt TMJ, Abdulla A, van den Broek P, Hunfeld N, Bahmany S, Muller AE, Gommers D, Polinder S, Endeman H, Spronk I, Koch BCP. Barriers and facilitators for therapeutic drug monitoring of beta-lactams and ciprofloxacin in the ICU: a nationwide cross-sectional study. BMC Infect Dis 2022; 22:611. [PMID: 35831793 PMCID: PMC9277596 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-022-07587-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Recent studies demonstrated that failure of achieving pharmacodynamic targets of commonly used antibiotics is common in critically ill patients. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can contribute to optimize the exposure of beta-lactams and ciprofloxacin. While evidence for TDM of these antibiotics is growing, translation into clinical implementation remains limited. Therefore, perceived barriers and facilitators are important for implementing TDM in this population. The primary aim of this study was to identify healthcare professionals’ barriers and facilitators for the implementation of TDM of beta-lactams and ciprofloxacin in Dutch intensive care units (ICU). Methods We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional online survey among healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in antibiotic treatment of ICU patients. An adapted version of the Measurement Instrument for Determinants of Innovations was sent out. Items were considered barriers when ≥ 20% of participants responded with a negative answer. If ≥ 80% of the participants responded with a positive answer, the item was considered a facilitator. Results Sixty-four HCPs completed the survey, of which 14 were from academic hospitals, 25 from general hospitals, and 25 from teaching hospitals. Most participants were hospital pharmacists (59%) or medical specialists (23%). Eleven barriers and four facilitators for implementation of TDM of beta-lactams were identified; 17 barriers for TDM of ciprofloxacin and no facilitators. The most important barriers were a lack of conclusive evidence, organizational support, and low availability of assays. Additional barriers were a lack of consensus on which specific patients to apply TDM and which pharmacodynamic targets to use. Identified facilitators for beta-lactam TDM implementation are low complexity and high task perception, combined with the perception that TDM is important to prevent side effects and to adequately treat infections. Twenty-eight percent of participants reported that flucloxacillin could be analyzed in their hospital. Assay availability of other beta-lactams and ciprofloxacin was lower (3–17%). Conclusion Several barriers were identified that could obstruct the implementation of TDM of beta-lactams and ciprofloxacin in the ICU. In particular, education, clear guidelines, and organizational support should be considered when creating tailored implementation strategies. Finally, evidence of beneficial clinical outcomes on TDM of beta-lactams and ciprofloxacin can enhance further implementation. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-022-07587-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim M J Ewoldt
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Alan Abdulla
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Nicole Hunfeld
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Soma Bahmany
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anouk E Muller
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Microbiology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Diederik Gommers
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Suzanne Polinder
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henrik Endeman
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Inge Spronk
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Birgit C P Koch
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen C, Seabury RW, Steele JM, Parsels KA, Darko W, Miller CD, Kufel WD. Evaluation of β-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring among US health systems with postgraduate year 2 infectious diseases pharmacy residency programs. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2022; 79:1273-1280. [PMID: 35439284 DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/zxac117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
DISCLAIMER In an effort to expedite the publication of articles related to the COVID-19 pandemic, AJHP is posting these manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. PURPOSE While some guidelines recognize the need for β-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), there is still a paucity of data regarding the prevalence of and barriers to performing β-lactam TDM in the United States. We sought to estimate the prevalence of β-lactam TDM, describe monitoring practices, and identify actual and perceived barriers to implementation among health systems in the US. METHODS A multicenter, cross-sectional, 40-item electronic survey was distributed to all postgraduate year 2 (PGY2) infectious diseases (ID) pharmacy residency program directors (RPDs) listed in the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists pharmacy residency directory. The primary outcome was the percentage of institutions with established β-lactam TDM. Secondary outcomes included assessing β-lactam TDM methods and identifying potential barriers to implementation. RESULTS The survey was distributed to 126 PGY2 ID RPDs, with a response rate of 31.7% (40 of 126). Only 7.7% of respondents (3 of 39) performed β-lactam TDM. Patient populations, therapeutic targets, and frequency and timing of obtaining repeat β-lactam concentration measurements varied among institutions. The greatest barrier to implementation was lack of access to testing with a rapid turnaround time. Institutions were unlikely to implement β-lactam TDM within the next year but were significantly more inclined to do so within 5 years (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Β-lactam TDM was infrequently performed at the surveyed US health systems. Lack of access to serum concentration testing with rapid turnaround and lack of US-specific guidelines appear to be considerable barriers to implementing β-lactam TDM. Among institutions that have implemented β-lactam TDM, there is considerable variation in monitoring approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chieh Chen
- State University of New York Upstate University Hospital, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Robert W Seabury
- State University of New York Upstate University Hospital, Syracuse, NY, and State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Jeffrey M Steele
- State University of New York Upstate University Hospital, Syracuse, NY, and State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Katie A Parsels
- State University of New York Upstate University Hospital, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - William Darko
- State University of New York Upstate University Hospital, Syracuse, NY, and State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Christopher D Miller
- State University of New York Upstate University Hospital, Syracuse, NY, and State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Wesley D Kufel
- State University of New York Upstate University Hospital, Syracuse, NY, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, and Binghamton University School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Binghamton, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abdulla A, van den Broek P, Ewoldt TMJ, Muller AE, Endeman H, Koch BCP. Barriers and Facilitators in the Clinical Implementation of Beta-Lactam Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients: A Critical Review. Ther Drug Monit 2022; 44:112-120. [PMID: 34798631 DOI: 10.1097/ftd.0000000000000937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With increasing knowledge of beta-lactam pharmacodynamics and interpatient and intrapatient variability in pharmacokinetics, the usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is becoming increasingly clear. However, little research has been conducted to identify potential barriers and facilitators in the clinical implementation of beta-lactam TDM. This study provides an overview of the current practices of beta-lactam TDM and barriers and facilitators in its implementation. METHODS A systematic search was conducted using the Ovid MEDLINE database in April 2021, without restrictions on the publication date. All studies reporting the implementation of beta-lactam antibiotic TDM in critically ill patients through questionnaires or surveys were included in this review. RESULTS Six eligible studies were identified from 215 records, all of which were cross-sectional. All studies identified barriers and facilitators in the implementation of beta-lactam TDM in critically ill patients. The main barriers were insufficient knowledge about various aspects regarding the implementation of beta-lactam TDM and the unavailability of assays. Furthermore, a delay in the acquisition of TDM results reduces the probability of physicians altering drug dosages. Finally, doubts about the cost-effectiveness and clinical effectiveness of beta-lactam TDM in critically ill patients hinder broad implementation. Moreover, to improve the willingness of physicians to use beta-lactam TDM, collaboration between physicians and clinical pharmacists and clinical microbiologists should be strengthened. CONCLUSIONS Although the evidence for application of beta-lactam TDM continues to grow, its clinical implementation remains limited. To enable optimal implementation of these antibiotics in critically ill patients, several barriers need to be overcome regarding logistics, equipment availability, clinical evidence, and proof of cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan Abdulla
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Puck van den Broek
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Tim M J Ewoldt
- Department of Adult Intensive Care, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anouk E Muller
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; and
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Henrik Endeman
- Department of Adult Intensive Care, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Birgit C P Koch
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pharmacokinetics of Antibiotics in Pediatric Intensive Care: Fostering Variability to Attain Precision Medicine. Antibiotics (Basel) 2021; 10:antibiotics10101182. [PMID: 34680763 PMCID: PMC8532953 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10101182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Revised: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Children show important developmental and maturational changes, which may contribute greatly to pharmacokinetic (PK) variability observed in pediatric patients. These PK alterations are further enhanced by disease-related, non-maturational factors. Specific to the intensive care setting, such factors include critical illness, inflammatory status, augmented renal clearance (ARC), as well as therapeutic interventions (e.g., extracorporeal organ support systems or whole-body hypothermia [WBH]). This narrative review illustrates the relevance of both maturational and non-maturational changes in absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) applied to antibiotics. It hereby provides a focused assessment of the available literature on the impact of critical illness—in general, and in specific subpopulations (ARC, extracorporeal organ support systems, WBH)—on PK and potential underexposure in children and neonates. Overall, literature discussing antibiotic PK alterations in pediatric intensive care is scarce. Most studies describe antibiotics commonly monitored in clinical practice such as vancomycin and aminoglycosides. Because of the large PK variability, therapeutic drug monitoring, further extended to other antibiotics, and integration of model-informed precision dosing in clinical practice are suggested to optimise antibiotic dose and exposure in each newborn, infant, or child during intensive care.
Collapse
|
6
|
Barreto EF, Webb AJ, Pais GM, Rule AD, Jannetto PJ, Scheetz MH. Setting the Beta-Lactam Therapeutic Range for Critically Ill Patients: Is There a Floor or Even a Ceiling? Crit Care Explor 2021; 3:e0446. [PMID: 34136822 PMCID: PMC8202642 DOI: 10.1097/cce.0000000000000446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Beta-lactam antibiotics exhibit high interindividual variability in drug concentrations in patients with critical illness which led to an interest in the use of therapeutic drug monitoring to improve effectiveness and safety. To implement therapeutic drug monitoring, it is necessary to define the beta-lactam therapeutic range-in essence, what drug concentration would prompt a clinician to make dose adjustments up or down. This objective of this narrative review was to summarize evidence for the "floor" (for effectiveness) and "ceiling" (for toxicity) for the beta-lactam therapeutic range to be used with individualized therapeutic drug monitoring. DATA SOURCES Research articles were sourced from PubMed using search term combinations of "pharmacokinetics," "pharmacodynamics," "toxicity," "neurotoxicity," "therapeutic drug monitoring," "beta-lactam," "cefepime," "meropenem," "piperacillin/tazobactam," "ICU," and "critical illness." STUDY SELECTION Articles were selected if they included preclinical, translational, or clinical data on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic thresholds for effectiveness and safety for beta-lactams in critical illness. DATA SYNTHESIS Experimental data indicate a beta-lactam concentration above the minimum inhibitory concentration of the organism for greater than or equal to 40-60% of the dosing interval is needed, but clinical data indicate that higher concentrations may be preferrable. In the first 48 hours of critical illness, a free beta-lactam concentration at or above the susceptibility breakpoint of the most likely pathogen for 100% of the dosing interval would be reasonable (typically based on Pseudomonas aeruginosa). After 48 hours, the lowest acceptable concentration could be tailored to 1-2× the observed minimum inhibitory concentration of the organism for 100% of the dosing interval (often a more susceptible organism). Neurotoxicity is the primary dose-dependent adverse effect of beta-lactams, but the evidence remains insufficient to link a specific drug concentration to greater risk. CONCLUSIONS As studies advance the understanding of beta-lactam exposure and response in critically ill patients, it is essential to clearly define the acceptable therapeutic range to guide regimen selection and adjustment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin F Barreto
- Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Andrew J Webb
- Department of Pharmacy, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Gwendolyn M Pais
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Chicago College of Pharmacy, Midwestern University, Downers Grove, IL
- Pharmacometrics Center of Excellence, Midwestern University, Downers Grove, IL
| | - Andrew D Rule
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
- Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Paul J Jannetto
- Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Marc H Scheetz
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Chicago College of Pharmacy, Midwestern University, Downers Grove, IL
- Pharmacometrics Center of Excellence, Midwestern University, Downers Grove, IL
| |
Collapse
|