LULL(ed) into complacency: a perspective on licenses and stem cell translational science

Ten years of iPSC: clinical potential and advances in vitro hematopoietic differentiation

Ten years have passed since the first publication announcing the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). Issues related to ethics, immune rejection, and cell availability seemed to be solved following this breakthrough. The development of iPSC technology allows advances in in vitro cell differentiation for cell therapy purpose and other clinical applications. This review provides a perspective on the iPSC potential for cell therapies, particularly for hematological applications. We discuss the advances in in vitro hematopoietic differentiation, the possibilities to employ iPSC in hematology studies, and their potential clinical application in hematologic diseases. The generation of red blood cells and functional T cells and the genome editing technology applied to mutation correction are also covered. We highlight some of the requirements and obstacles to be overcome before translating these cells from research to the clinic, for instance, iPSC variability, genotoxicity, the differentiation process, and engraftment. Also, we evaluate the patent landscape and compile the clinical trials in the field of pluripotent stem cells. Currently, we know much more about iPSC than in 2006, but there are still challenges that must be solved. A greater understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying the generation of hematopoietic stem cells is necessary to produce suitable and transplantable hematopoietic stem progenitor cells from iPSC.

Developing Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Based Therapy for the Masses

The discovery of induced pluripotent stem cells and the ability to manufacture them using clinically compliant protocols has the potential to revolutionize the field of regenerative medicine. However, realizing this potential requires the development of processes that are reliable, reproducible, and cost-effective and that at the same time do not compromise the safety of the individuals receiving this therapy. In the present report, we discuss how cost reductions can be obtained using our experience with obtaining approval of biologic agents, autologous therapy, and the recent approval of cord blood banks. Significance: For therapy to be widely available, the cost of manufacturing stem cells must be reduced. The steps proposed in the present report, when implemented, have the potential to reduce these costs significantly.