1
|
Yang MA, Korsnack K. Pairing a bioinformatics-focused course-based undergraduate research experience with specifications grading in an introductory biology classroom. Biol Methods Protoc 2024; 9:bpae013. [PMID: 38463936 PMCID: PMC10924719 DOI: 10.1093/biomethods/bpae013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 01/27/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Introducing bioinformatics-focused concepts and skills in a biology classroom is difficult, especially in introductory biology classrooms. Course-based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs) facilitate this process, introducing genomics and bioinformatics through authentic research experiences, but the many learning objectives needed in scientific research and communication, foundational biology concepts, and bioinformatics-focused concepts and skills can make the process challenging. Here, the pairing of specifications grading with a bioinformatics-focused CURE developed by the Genomics Education Partnership is described. The study examines how the course structure with specifications grading facilitated scaffolding of writing assignments, group work, and metacognitive activities; and describes the synergies between CUREs and specifications grading. CUREs require mastery of related concepts and skills for working through the research process, utilize common research practices of revision and iteration, and encourage a growth mindset to learning-all of which are heavily incentivized in assessment practices focused on specifications grading.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melinda A Yang
- Department of Biology, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA 23173, United States
| | - Kylie Korsnack
- Teaching and Scholarship Hub, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA 23173, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Monthofer EG, Ito JM, Battaglia S, Diaz-Martinez LA. Responsible and ethical conduct of research (RECR) diagnostic survey using case scenarios from biology course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs). JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY & BIOLOGY EDUCATION 2023; 24:e00119-23. [PMID: 38107996 PMCID: PMC10720421 DOI: 10.1128/jmbe.00119-23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) are increasingly becoming the first, and perhaps only, research experience for many biology students. Responsible and ethical conduct of research (RECR) is crucial for the integrity of scientific research and essential for students to have an understanding of the scientific process at any academic level. However, there is a current lack of RECR education in biology CUREs. To understand the level of RECR knowledge and skills in undergraduate students, we created a diagnostic survey that uses case scenarios designed to illustrate RECR issues in the CURE classroom. Analysis of students' responses indicated that the overall percentage of students who are able to effectively use RECR terminology and identify the impact of RECR violations on science integrity and ultimately on society is low. Furthermore, some students equated RECR violations to academic dishonesty, indicating difficulties separating the research and academic aspects of CUREs. This diagnostic tool can aid instructors in identifying gaps in student RECR knowledge for the subsequent development of RECR educational interventions, particularly to ensure the integrity of the research performed in CURE settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jewel M. Ito
- Department of Biology, Gonzaga University, Spokane, Washington, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Smith CR, Menon D, Wierzbicki A, Dauer JM. Exploring STEM Teaching Assistants' Self-Efficacy and Its Relation to Approaches to Teaching. CBE LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION 2023; 22:ar6. [PMID: 36637378 PMCID: PMC10074270 DOI: 10.1187/cbe.22-06-0115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Revised: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Undergraduate and graduate teaching assistants (TAs) play large roles in introductory undergraduate education despite having little to no teaching experience or professional development (PD). Self-efficacy and teaching approach have each been studied as independent variables that impact teaching performance and student learning in the absence of practiced skill or developed knowledge. This study explored relationships between TAs' teaching approaches and teaching self-efficacy. Self-efficacy was measured using the Graduate Teaching Self-Efficacy Scale (GTA-TSES), and teaching approach was measured using the Approaches to Teaching Inventory (ATI). The following research questions guided the study: What is the relationship between TAs' approaches to teaching and their self-efficacy? How do approaches to teaching and self-efficacy interact to impact the model of TA self-efficacy? Both ATI subscales correlated strongly with the GTA-TSES learning environment subscale and weakly with the instructional strategy subscale. High self-efficacy TAs demonstrated more concern with impacting student learning, which may contribute to a more student-centered teaching approach. Results indicate that TAs with more confidence in their teaching ability may have a more student-centered approach than teacher-centered approach to teaching. Implications include enhancing TA PD with peer mentoring, constructive feedback, and reflection and incorporating learning concerns in the model of TA teacher efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cody R. Smith
- Department of Kinesiology, Missouri State University, Springfield, MO 65897
| | - Deepika Menon
- Teaching, Learning & Teacher Education, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68503
| | - Annette Wierzbicki
- School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68503
| | - Jenny M. Dauer
- School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68503
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Leone EA, French DP. A Mixed-Methods Study of a Poster Presentation Activity, Students' Science Identity, and Science Communication Self-Efficacy under Remote Teaching Conditions. JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY & BIOLOGY EDUCATION 2022; 23:e00262-21. [PMID: 35496693 PMCID: PMC9053064 DOI: 10.1128/jmbe.00262-21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Disseminating and communicating scientific findings is an acknowledged part of the research experience, but few science programs include explicit undergraduate curricula for practicing oral science communication. Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) can provide opportunities for students to practice science communication, but few studies describe or assess authentic oral science communication activities within CUREs, and none do so under hybrid conditions. The existing literature lacks substantial evidence for how science communication activities impact students' science identity and science communication self-efficacy, specifically regarding research posters. To address this, we collected students' quantitative and qualitative perceptions of science identity and science communication self-efficacy in a hybrid CURE and collected students' qualitative perceptions of presenting their research remotely at a virtual poster symposium. We found that students' science identity and science communication self-efficacy improved significantly, as well as benefits and complaints about presenting research virtually, namely, reduced stress, a more comfortable atmosphere, but a murkier communication channel. Our results should prove valuable to educators interested in improving students' science identity and science communication self-efficacy, especially when limited to a virtual or hybrid format, as affective factors strongly impact students' persistence in science.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E. Austin Leone
- Department of Integrative Biology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Donald P. French
- Department of Integrative Biology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Musgrove MMC, Cooley A, Feiten O, Petrie K, Schussler EE. To Cope or Not to Cope? Characterizing Biology Graduate Teaching Assistant (GTA) Coping with Teaching and Research Anxieties. CBE LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION 2021; 20:ar56. [PMID: 34546100 PMCID: PMC8715775 DOI: 10.1187/cbe.20-08-0175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Recent evidence suggests a mental health crisis among graduate students, particularly with regard to anxiety. To manage anxieties, graduate students can employ coping strategies. Coping is an individual's response(s) to external stressors, often with the goal of reducing or tolerating the stress; these strategies are generally considered adaptive or maladaptive. Adaptive coping strategies advance individuals through problems, while maladaptive strategies prevent stressors from being resolved. We previously identified differences between teaching and research anxieties in a sample of biology graduate teaching assistants (GTAs). This study investigated whether coping with these anxieties differed in this population as well. We interviewed 23 biology GTAs twice over one year. Interview data were qualitatively analyzed using Skinner and colleagues' major coping families as categories. Biology GTAs most often used adaptive coping strategies, such as problem solving and information seeking, to manage both teaching and research anxieties. However, other coping strategies were preferentially employed for either teaching or research, suggesting differences in these aspects of graduate student life. Over one year, GTAs reduced the number of coping strategies they employed. Understanding how GTAs cope with teaching and research anxieties may inform the types of support faculty and professional development leaders can provide to graduate students.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miranda M. Chen Musgrove
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309
| | - Alyssa Cooley
- Department Psychology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996
| | - Olivia Feiten
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996
| | - Kate Petrie
- Department Psychology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996
| | - Elisabeth E. Schussler
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Johnson ZA, Sciolino NR, Plummer NW, Harrison PR, Jensen P, Robertson SD. Assessment of Mapping the Brain, a Novel Research and Neurotechnology Based Approach for the Modern Neuroscience Classroom. JOURNAL OF UNDERGRADUATE NEUROSCIENCE EDUCATION : JUNE : A PUBLICATION OF FUN, FACULTY FOR UNDERGRADUATE NEUROSCIENCE 2021; 19:A226-A259. [PMID: 34552440 PMCID: PMC8437363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Neuroscience research is changing at an incredible pace due to technological innovation and recent national and global initiatives such as the BRAIN initiative. Given the wealth of data supporting the value of course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) for students, we developed and assessed a neurotechnology CURE, Mapping the Brain. The goal of the course is to immerse undergraduate and graduate students in research and to explore technological advances in neuroscience. In the laboratory portion of the course, students pursued a hypothesis-driven, collaborative National Institutes of Health (NIH) research project. Using chemogenetic technology (Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs-DREADDs) and a recombinase-based intersectional genetic strategy, students mapped norepinephrine neurons, and their projections and explored the effects of activating these neurons in vivo. In lecture, students compared traditional and cutting-edge neuroscience methodologies, analyzed primary literature, designed hypothesis-based experiments, and discussed technological limitations of studying the brain. Over two consecutive years in the Program at North Carolina State University, we assessed student learning and perceptions of learning based on Society for Neuroscience's (SfN) core concepts and essential principles of neuroscience. Using analysis of student assignments and pre/post content and perception-based course surveys, we also assessed whether the course improved student research article analysis and neurotechnology assessment. Our analyses reveal new insights and pedagogical approaches for engaging students in research and improving their critical analysis of research articles and neurotechnologies. Our data also show that our multifaceted approach increased student confidence and promoted a data focused mentality when tackling research literature. Through the integration of authentic research and a neurotechnology focus, Mapping the Brain provides a unique model as a modern neuroscience laboratory course.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary A. Johnson
- Virginia Tech, Department of Biological Sciences, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USA
| | - Natale R. Sciolino
- Neurobiology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA
| | - Nicholas W. Plummer
- Neurobiology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA
| | - Patrick R. Harrison
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Patricia Jensen
- Neurobiology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA
| | - Sabrina D. Robertson
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Garcia CB, Chapman IF, Chen SH, Lazear E, Lentz TB, Williams C, Dums JT, Goller CC, Robertson SD. Integrating research into a molecular cloning course to address the evolving biotechnology landscape. BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY EDUCATION : A BIMONTHLY PUBLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY 2021; 49:115-128. [PMID: 33176069 DOI: 10.1002/bmb.21402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Revised: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
The rapid development of molecular biotechnology presents a curricular challenge for educators trying to provide students with relevant coursework. A comprehensive biology education should also include opportunities for students to develop intellectual and technical skills through authentic research experiences. Integrating relevant and interesting research projects into their classes, however, can be a challenging task for instructors. To address these varied demands, we redesigned our existing molecular cloning course to incorporate an independent research project assessing calcium signaling. In the revised course, students use traditional and recombination-based cloning strategies to generate bacterial and mammalian expression vectors encoding CaMPARI, a novel fluorescent calcium indicator. Bacterially-expressed CaMPARI is used in protein quantification and purification assays. Students must also design their own research project evaluating the effect of chemotherapeutic agents on calcium signaling in a mammalian system. Revised and novel labs were designed to be modular, facilitating their integration into the course over 2 years. End-of-semester student evaluations were compared between years revealing a significant difference in students' perception of the course's difficulty between years. This change in attitude highlights potential pedagogical considerations that must be examined when introducing new material and activities into existing courses. Since calcium signaling is important for cellular process across diverse species, instructors may be able to develop research projects within their respective areas of interest. Integration of authentic research experiences into the curriculum is challenging; however, the framework described here provides a versatile structure that can be adapted to merge diverse instructor interests with evolving educational needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina B Garcia
- Biology Program, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Program, Centre College, Danville, Kentucky, USA
| | - Ian F Chapman
- Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Stefanie H Chen
- Department of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology Teaching Program, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Thomas B Lentz
- Department of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology Teaching Program, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
| | - Christina Williams
- Department of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology Teaching Program, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jacob T Dums
- Viral Ecology and Informatics Laboratory, University of Delaware, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - Carlos C Goller
- Department of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology Teaching Program, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sabrina D Robertson
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Whitley KV, Tueller JA, Weber KS. Genomics Education in the Era of Personal Genomics: Academic, Professional, and Public Considerations. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:ijms21030768. [PMID: 31991576 PMCID: PMC7037382 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21030768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2019] [Revised: 01/18/2020] [Accepted: 01/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Since the completion of the Human Genome Project in 2003, genomic sequencing has become a prominent tool used by diverse disciplines in modern science. In the past 20 years, the cost of genomic sequencing has decreased exponentially, making it affordable and accessible. Bioinformatic and biological studies have produced significant scientific breakthroughs using the wealth of genomic information now available. Alongside the scientific benefit of genomics, companies offer direct-to-consumer genetic testing which provide health, trait, and ancestry information to the public. A key area that must be addressed is education about what conclusions can be made from this genomic information and integrating genomic education with foundational genetic principles already taught in academic settings. The promise of personal genomics providing disease treatment is exciting, but many challenges remain to validate genomic predictions and diagnostic correlations. Ethical and societal concerns must also be addressed regarding how personal genomic information is used. This genomics revolution provides a powerful opportunity to educate students, clinicians, and the public on scientific and ethical issues in a personal way to increase learning. In this review, we discuss the influence of personal genomics in society and focus on the importance and benefits of genomics education in the classroom, clinics, and the public and explore the potential consequences of personal genomic education.
Collapse
|
9
|
Govindan B, Pickett S, Riggs B. Fear of the CURE: A Beginner's Guide to Overcoming Barriers in Creating a Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience. JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY & BIOLOGY EDUCATION 2020; 21:jmbe-21-48. [PMID: 32528607 PMCID: PMC7243983 DOI: 10.1128/jmbe.v21i2.2109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 04/10/2020] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Over the past decade, growing evidence has shown that there are many benefits to undergraduate students engaging in scientific research, including increased persistence in pursuing STEM careers and successful outcomes in graduate study. With these benefits in mind, there has been a significant push toward providing research opportunities for students in STEM majors. To address this need, an increasing number of undergraduate courses have been developed to provide students with research experiences in a class setting, also known as course-based undergraduate research experiences, or CUREs. Despite the growing success of these courses, a number of barriers remain that deter faculty from developing and implementing CUREs. Here, we will review the perceived challenges of developing a CURE and provide practical strategies to overcome these challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brinda Govindan
- Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94132
| | - Sarah Pickett
- Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94132
- Center for Teaching and Learning, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720
| | - Blake Riggs
- Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94132
- Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biology, 1600 Holloway Ave., San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94132. Phone: 415-338-1499. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|