Relative Dose Intensity: Improving Cancer Treatment and Outcomes

Relative dose intensity of taxane-based chemotherapy in breast cancer patients in a tertiary hospital

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer (BC) is the most diagnosed tumor among women worldwide. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and causes of low relative dose intensity (RDI) < 85% for taxane-based chemotherapy regimens used in the treatment of BC in Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (SQUH).

METHODS

This was a retrospective study that included 303 BC patients, treated with taxane-based chemotherapy protocols at SQUH. RDI was calculated for each chemotherapy regimen and causes and predictors of low RDI < 85% were identified. Prophylactic and therapeutic supportive measures for certain toxicities were studied.

RESULTS

50.8% of the patients had neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 38% had adjuvant chemotherapy, and 11.2% of patients were given palliative treatment. AC-T and AC-THP were the most used regimens (40.3% and 17.2%). Mean RDI of used taxane-based chemotherapy regimens was 93.4%. Dose delays, dose reductions, and treatment discontinuation occurred in 36.6%, 14.8%, and 11.5%, respectively. Thirty-eight patients (12.5%) had low RDI < 85% which was reduced to 9.9% after the use of an alternative taxane. Age and chemotherapy intent were significant risk factors. 83.8% received primary granulocyte colony stimulating factor.

CONCLUSION

An optimal RDI greater than 85% was achieved in most cases. Furthermore, prophylactic and therapeutic supportive measures were widely used.

Novel Methods for Reporting of Exercise Dose and Adherence: An Exploratory Analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to explore whether methods adapted from oncology pharmacological trials have utility in reporting adherence (tolerability) of exercise treatment in cancer.

METHODS

Using a retrospective analysis of a randomized trial, 25 prostate cancer patients received an aerobic training regimen of 72 supervised treadmill walking sessions delivered thrice weekly between 55% and 100% of exercise capacity for 24 consecutive weeks. Treatment adherence (tolerability) was assessed using conventional (lost to follow-up and attendance) and exploratory (e.g., permanent discontinuation, dose modification, and relative dose intensity) outcomes.

RESULTS

The mean total cumulative "planned" and "completed" dose was 200.7 ± 47.6 and 153.8 ± 68.8 MET·h, respectively, equating to a mean relative dose intensity of 77% ± 24%. Two patients (8%) were lost to follow-up, and mean attendance was 79%. A total of 6 (24%) of 25 patients permanently discontinued aerobic training before week 24. Aerobic training was interrupted (missing ≥3 consecutive sessions) or dose reduced in a total of 11 (44%) and 24 (96%) patients, respectively; a total 185 (10%) of 1800 training sessions required dose reduction owing to both health-related (all nonserious) and non-health-related adverse events. Eighteen (72%) patients required at least one session to be terminated early; a total of 59 (3%) sessions required early termination.

CONCLUSIONS

Novel methods for the conduct and reporting of exercise treatment adherence and tolerability may provide important information beyond conventional metrics in patients with cancer.

Prognostic factors in patients after definitive chemoradiation using involved-field radiotherapy for esophageal cancer in a phase II study

BACKGROUND

A prospective study was performed on the use of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for esophageal cancer (EC) with involved-field radiation therapy (IFRT), based on 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography. Prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) were analyzed.

METHODS

Eligible patients included 63 adults with newly diagnosed, untreated, inoperable stage I-IV EC with lymph node metastases. Patients received 80 mg/m² nedaplatin per day on day 1, 800 mg/m² 5-fluorouracil on days 1-4 intravenously repeated every 28 days for two to four cycles, and combined IFRT. Irradiation was applied only to the primary tumor and positive lymph nodes.

RESULTS

Three-year progression-free survival and OS rates were 44.9% and 47.5%, respectively. The median survival time was 31.5 months. In univariate analyses for OS, Karnofsy Performance Scale <90% (P = 0.027), initial stage (P = 0.0087), T stage (P = 0.066), N stage (P = 0.000086), M stage of M1 (P = 0.0042), dysphagia score (P = 0.00017), tumor marker squamous cell carcinoma antigen >1.5 ng/mL (P = 0.0054), gross tumor volume (GTV) > 60 cc (P = 0.00011), and relative dose intensity (RDI) of chemotherapy ≤50% (P = 0.063) were found to be associated with significantly or marginally worse OS. In multivariate analyses for OS, GTV ≥ 60 cc (P = 0.00040), RDI < 50% (P = 0.00034), and cN2-3 (P = 0.0020) were associated with significantly worse OS.

CONCLUSION

GTV, RDI and N grading, were associated with OS after definitive CRT using IFRT for EC.

Efficacy and safety of docetaxel plus oxaliplatin as a first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Platinum doublets are standard first-line treatment for stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without targetable driver mutations. Oxaliplatin is more potent than cisplatin, requiring fewer DNA adducts to provide equivalent cytotoxicity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin combined with docetaxel as a first-line treatment for stage IV NSCLC.

METHODS

This was a prospective, single-center, phase II trial. Patients with chemotherapy-naive NSCLC received 60 mg/m(2) docetaxel (day 1) and 70 mg/m(2) oxaliplatin (day 2) every three weeks for up to six cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Treatment response was evaluated according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients were enrolled and a response evaluation was available in 31 patients. There were 11 patients with a partial response, 15 with stable disease, and five with progressive disease. Two patients ceased further treatment after the first cycle of chemotherapy. Thus, the ORR was 33.3% in the 33 patients of the intention-to-treat population. Median PFS was 3.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8-4.5), and median OS was 10.9 months (95% CI, 8.2-13.6). The most common hematologic toxicity was neutropenia. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 51.5% of patients.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that the combination of oxaliplatin and docetaxel is effective in patients with NSCLC with reasonable toxicity.

Febrile neutropenia risk assessment tool: improving clinical outcomes for oncology patients

PURPOSE

To develop, implement and evaluate the effectiveness of a nurse-led risk assessment tool to reduce the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) and evaluate the nurse's role in FN risk assessment in a hospital-based oncology unit.

METHODS AND SAMPLE

A FN risk assessment tool was developed, implemented and evaluated. A comparative prospective observational chart review was undertaken to evaluate the tool. Clinical data were collected from 459 patients' records from August 2008 through July 2009. Patients had no intervention during the first six months (n = 233). Patients in the following six months (n = 226) had the FN risk assessment completed and appropriate granulocyte-colony stimulating factor prescribed. A self-questionnaire was utilised to evaluate the nurses' role in FN risk assessment.

KEY RESULTS

The incidence of FN was reduced by 52% (p = 0.02). Hospital days, dose reductions and treatment delays were reduced. Nurses felt they were the most appropriate person to carry out the assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Through consistent risk assessment, nurses could determine which patients were at high risk of developing FN leading to significant reduction in life-threatening infections, hospitalisations, dose reductions and delays. Nurses can be confident and competent in decision-making to reduce life-threatening infections through the use of an FN risk assessment tool.

Improving the relative dose intensity of systemic chemotherapy in a community-based outpatient cancer center

PURPOSE

This three-phase study was performed to improve the mean relative dose intensity (RDI) of chemotherapy administered to patients in a community-based outpatient cancer center.

METHODS

Medical records were reviewed for patients who began receiving systemic chemotherapy for lymphoma or cancer of the breast, lung, endometrium, ovary, or colon. During phase 1, records were reviewed and the mean RDI was determined through collection of demographic, diagnostic, chemotherapy, and laboratory data. Phase 2 involved implementation of quality improvement initiatives to improve the RDI: development of a febrile neutropenia risk assessment tool, revision of our dose cancellation policy, and interdisciplinary education. Finally, after implementation of these initiatives, the mean RDI was prospectively determined in phase 3, similar to phase 1.

RESULTS

The mean RDI was determined to be 83% during phase 1 compared with 91% during phase 3 (P=.0087). For adjuvant chemotherapy, the mean RDI was 85% and 95% for phases 1 and 3, respectively (P=.0035). Likewise, for metastatic disease, the mean RDI was 76% and 82% for phases 1 and 3, respectively (P=.3935). The proportion of regimens that met or exceeded the recommended minimum goal RDI of 85% was 54% for phase 1 and 80% for phase 3. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use increased from 69% preintervention to 81% postintervention.

CONCLUSION

The mean overall RDI improved above the threshold goal of 85%, with the RDI for adjuvant chemotherapy reaching 95%, after implementation of three quality-improvement initiatives. With continued education and following policies already in place, further improvements in RDI could be demonstrated.

Relative dose intensity--improving treatment and outcomes in early-stage breast cancer: a retrospective study

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To determine the amount of chemotherapy delivered compared to amount of chemotherapy scheduled by calculating relative dose intensity (RDI) and to identify factors associated with nonadherence of scheduled treatment regimens for patients with early-stage breast cancer (ESBC).

DESIGN

Retrospective, descriptive, correlational study.

SETTING

Two community hospital cancer centers in northern Michigan.

SAMPLE

77 patients with ESBC receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

The RDI Calculator™ was used for data collection. A worksheet was developed for each patient and included characteristics, treatment information, and RDI calculations. SAS®, version 19.2, was used for multivariate analyses based on logistical regression analyzing relationships among dependent and independent variables.

MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES

Dependent variables were RDI prescribed and RDI received. Independent variables included chemotherapy regimen, clinical characteristics, planned dose, and schedule.

FINDINGS

The average RDI was 86.6%. The average RDI was 86.7% for patients younger than age 65, and 85.5% for those 65 and older. The most common reasons for dose reduction or dose delay were treatment toxicity, chronic disease risk factors, age, unplanned versus planned treatment dose, institution (different standards of care), patient preference, and weight.

CONCLUSIONS

Meeting treatment goals of RDI for patients with ESBC has been shown to increase the disease-free survival rate and positively affects overall survival.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Nurses have the unique opportunity to case manage patients with ESBC throughout the spectrum of care. One of the key areas of focus is education of the patient and her family members from the time of diagnosis throughout treatment and rehabilitation.

Appropriate chemotherapy dosing for obese adult patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline

PURPOSE

To provide recommendations for appropriate cytotoxic chemotherapy dosing for obese adult patients with cancer.

METHODS

The American Society of Clinical Oncology convened a Panel of experts in medical and gynecologic oncology, clinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics, and biostatistics and a patient representative. MEDLINE searches identified studies published in English between 1996 and 2010, and a systematic review of the literature was conducted. A majority of studies involved breast, ovarian, colon, and lung cancers. This guideline does not address dosing for novel targeted agents.

RESULTS

Practice pattern studies demonstrate that up to 40% of obese patients receive limited chemotherapy doses that are not based on actual body weight. Concerns about toxicity or overdosing in obese patients with cancer, based on the use of actual body weight, are unfounded.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The Panel recommends that full weight-based cytotoxic chemotherapy doses be used to treat obese patients with cancer, particularly when the goal of treatment is cure. There is no evidence that short- or long-term toxicity is increased among obese patients receiving full weight-based doses. Most data indicate that myelosuppression is the same or less pronounced among the obese than the non-obese who are administered full weight-based doses. Clinicians should respond to all treatment-related toxicities in obese patients in the same ways they do for non-obese patients. The use of fixed-dose chemotherapy is rarely justified, but the Panel does recommend fixed dosing for a few select agents. The Panel recommends further research into the role of pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics to guide appropriate dosing of obese patients with cancer.

Dose intensity in early-stage breast cancer: a community practice experience

Although nodal status, grade, size, and receptor status play roles in determining breast cancer prognosis, there is increasing evidence that maintaining dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy increases disease-free survival rate.

Implementing and measuring the impact of patient navigation at a comprehensive community cancer center

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To determine whether patient navigation in a comprehensive community cancer center affects patient and staff perceptions of patient preparation for treatment, access to care, and overall satisfaction.

DESIGN

Program evaluation with patient and staff surveys.

SETTING

Comprehensive community cancer center accredited by the American College of Surgeons in the southeastern United States with 1,037 analytic cases of cancer in 2007; population of the main county served is about 177,963.

SAMPLE

48 patients (28 navigator and 20 non-navigator) and 26 employees, including physicians, nurses, and other support staff.

METHODS

A 10-item survey with Likert scale format was sent to a stratified sample of 100 newly diagnosed patients with cancer. A five-item survey with the same format was sent to 40 staff working with the patients.

MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLE

Patient navigation.

FINDINGS

Patients who received navigation services responded more positively to survey statements. Statistical significance (p > 0.05) was identified in 7 of 10 statements when patient groups were compared. Provider responses indicated agreement with all five statements included in the survey.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with cancer and oncology staff reported that patient navigation is effective in increasing patient satisfaction and decreasing barriers to care.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Patient navigation is an emerging trend in cancer care. Patient navigators can play a significant role in assisting patients with coordinating services across the continuum of care. Continued research is essential in refining the role and eminence of patient navigators.

Intravenous administration of antineoplastic drugs: review of basics and what's new in 2009

Today, newer treatment regimens combine chemotherapy with targeted therapy, based on an improved understanding of cancer pathophysiology. New diagnostic testing with microarray technology is helping to identify mutational sequences in patient tumors, so individualized treatment of cancer will occur during our lifetime. The administration of IV antineoplastic drugs continues to be an important role of infusion nurses. In addition, this therapy has also found a niche in the treatment of nonmalignant conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis. This article reviews the fundamentals of administration of IV antineoplastic drugs and current issues and trends.