1
|
Holland-Hart D, Longo M, Bridges S, Nixon LS, Hawkins M, Crosby T, Nelson A. The experiences of patients with oesophageal cancer receiving chemoradiotherapy treatment: a qualitative study embedded in the SCOPE2 trial. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e076394. [PMID: 39313288 PMCID: PMC11418518 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2024] [Indexed: 09/25/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This qualitative study explored patients' experiences and perceptions of the SCOPE2 trial. SCOPE2 examined radiotherapy dose escalation in patients with inoperable oesophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). SETTING Recruitment at five clinical sites in England and Wales, UK. PARTICIPANTS SCOPE2 trial participants were invited to take part in interviews from across five clinical sites. Participants self-selected to take part in up to three interviews across four different time points: baseline (before treatment) and at 2-3 months, 3-6 months or 6 months+ after baseline. There were five female and five male interview participants. INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomised to standard dose dCRT prescribed carboplatin/paclitaxel or cisplatin/capecitabine, or an escalated dose dCRT prescribed carboplatin/paclitaxel or cisplatin/capecitabine. METHODS This qualitative study used semistructured longitudinal interviews to explore the impact of treatment on patient outlook and quality of life and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Interview data were thematically analysed. RESULTS 10 patients participated in 16 longitudinal interviews. Three participants were accompanied by companions. Participants experienced side-effects from radiotherapy and chemotherapy including nausea, throat pain, difficulties eating and regaining appetite, thrombosis and fatigue, although most of these symptoms gradually improved. Participants required more ongoing information and support regarding treatment side-effects and cancer status in order to improve their overall quality of life. Best practice examples involved key contacts providing practical advice and signposting support. CONCLUSION Participants of the SCOPE2 trial reported short and longer-term side-effects from chemoradiotherapy, but these usually lessened over time. Participants attempted to be positive about their survival prospects by readjusting their expectations, priorities and lifestyles. Providing patients with ongoing opportunities to discuss detailed and timely information regarding treatment side-effects, aftercare and cancer status could improve the overall health and well-being of patients during oesophageal cancer trials and pathways. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02741856; ISRCTN: 97125464.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Maria Hawkins
- Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
- University College London
| | - Tom Crosby
- Velindre University NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Malcolm L. A retrospective comparative study of patient-reported outcome measures, pre-treatment and twelve months post-treatment using tumescent liposuction for the management of lower limb lipoedema. JPRAS Open 2024; 41:285-294. [PMID: 39161914 PMCID: PMC11332691 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2024.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/19/2024] [Indexed: 08/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Lipoedema is a painful adipose tissue disorder, affecting the limbs of women, that is resistant to diet and exercise. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the retrospective health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) outcomes for patients with lower limb lipoedema (LLL) following tumescent liposuction (TL). Methods Forty-seven patients received TL over 5 years from 2015-2020 for LLL. As part of their routine treatment evaluation, each patient completed 4 validated HRQoL questionnaires at initial assessment. The questionnaires examined the patients' experiences relating to anxiety and depression, lower extremity function, appearance, and symptoms. The same questionnaires were posted to the patients after an average of 12 months post-procedure/s to establish the outcomes of the intervention. Results The study demonstrated that patients' HRQoL improved at 12 months (average) following TL. The results of all the questionnaires were statistically significant, and patients with stage 3 LLL showed the most improvement in outcomes. Conclusion The findings demonstrated that TL achieves positive HRQoL outcomes in patients with LLL; however, long-term follow-up is needed to determine if the benefits sustain. Additionally, larger prospective controlled studies are required to provide robust evidence for this procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynne Malcolm
- School of Nursing, The University of Wolverhampton, Birmingham, West Midlands, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Murnaghan S, Scruton S, Urquhart R. Psychosocial interventions that facilitate adult cancer survivors' reintegration into daily life after active cancer treatment: a scoping review protocol. JBI Evid Synth 2022; 20:3025-3033. [PMID: 36065945 DOI: 10.11124/jbies-21-00438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This scoping review will map the extent and type of evidence related to psychosocial supports and interventions that facilitate adult cancer survivors' reintegration into daily life and activities after active cancer treatment. INTRODUCTION Cancer and its treatment have substantial late and long-term adverse impacts on survivors despite enhanced prospects for survival. Cancer survivors have unmet psychosocial care needs, and recent studies show a lack of focus in survivorship research on outcomes important to survivors. Reintegration is an emerging concept, identified as important to cancer survivors, that focuses on returning to a "new normal" after cancer treatment. This study will explore the available evidence on psychosocial interventions that are targeted toward this outcome. INCLUSION CRITERIA The population of interest is adult survivors (18 years and older at diagnosis) of any cancer type. Concepts of interest include psychosocial interventions targeting the outcome and reintegration into daily life after cancer treatment. Interventions addressing clinical depression or anxiety and interventions treating physical needs that are largely medically focused will be excluded. METHODS A scoping review of the literature will be conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Embase. Gray literature will be searched using ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Studies will be screened at the title/abstract and full-text levels, and data will be extracted by 2 independent reviewers. Disagreements that cannot be resolved will be settled by a third reviewer. Findings will be summarized narratively and in tabular format. SCOPING REVIEW REGISTRATION Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/r6bmx).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Murnaghan
- Department of Community Health & Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Sarah Scruton
- Department of Community Health & Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Robin Urquhart
- Department of Community Health & Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.,Department of Surgery, Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, NS, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Health-related quality of life in long-term Caribbean prostate cancer survivors: comparisons with prostate cancer-free men. Qual Life Res 2022; 31:3391-3401. [PMID: 35900615 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03202-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prostate cancer (PCa) and its treatment can impact health-related quality of life (HRQoL). There are few studies of HRQoL in long-term PCa survivors of African ancestry from low- and middle-income countries. We examined the effect of PCa treatment on HRQoL of Jamaican PCa survivors compared with cancer-free controls and explored the effect of demographic and clinical factors on these outcomes. METHODS PCa survivors (n = 64) treated with and without ADT along with PCa-free controls (n = 88) from a case-control study of 10 years post enrolment. HRQoL was measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EORTC-QLQ-C30). Effects of demographic and clinical variables on HRQoL on PCa and type of therapy were evaluated in multivariable linear regression models. RESULTS HRQoL of PCa survivors (overall and by treatment group) indicated a high quality of life, comparable to PCa-free men. However, ADT-treated survivors had lower physical functioning that was of small clinical relevance compared with those not on ADT. Symptom burden scores of PCa survivors and controls were similar excluding fatigue and dyspnoea which were highest in men on ADT and controls. In multivariable models, PCa was not an important determinant of overall HRQoL, functioning or symptom burdens. Underlying medical conditions and marital status were the main contributors to HRQoL in PCa survivors. CONCLUSION PCa cancer status was not an independent determinant of long-term HRQoL in Jamaican men. Interventions addressing social factors and comorbid illnesses could improve HRQOL in long-term PCa survivors.
Collapse
|
5
|
Cuthbert CA, Farragher JF, Farrer CL, Cheung WY. Living with paradox: A qualitative study of colorectal cancer patients' experiences in managing their health after cancer treatment. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2021; 30:e13416. [PMID: 33506569 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Revised: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Managing one's health after colorectal cancer may present specific challenges given long-term impacts to biopsychosocial functioning. Understanding experiences of managing one's health post-treatment is important to informing patient-centred supportive care. METHODS A qualitative study with 19 patients who had completed treatment for colorectal cancer to explore the experience of managing one's health. Following Thorne's Interpretive Description, we conducted interviews using either focus groups or individual interviews. Transcribed data were analysed following Thorne's approach. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were also collected. RESULTS The metaphor of living with paradox was the main theme characterising the experiences of managing one's health in the post-treatment period. Participants described the ambiguity of health, their need to accept the new normal, losing control and taking back control, experiencing positive and negative life changes, and the need to continually reframe their perspectives to focus on the positives. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that providing patient-centred care to colorectal cancer survivors post-treatment involves recognising their changing and sometimes conflicting experiences. Their ability to manage their health may fluctuate and their supportive care needs may not fit with a particular trajectory. Cancer care systems should strive for flexibility in the structure and timing of support available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colleen A Cuthbert
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Janine F Farragher
- Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Christie L Farrer
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Winson Y Cheung
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,CancerControl, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sexual function and rehabilitation after radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a review. Int J Impot Res 2021; 33:410-417. [PMID: 33408347 DOI: 10.1038/s41443-020-00389-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Revised: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The treatment of prostate cancer is partly guided by patient preferences. Radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy are the standard radical therapies for localized disease and render comparable oncologic outcomes. Considering that survival is high regardless of the chosen treatment, factors such as treatment-related toxicities affecting the patients' quality of life play an important role in their decision. Notably, post-treatment sexual dysfunction, which includes decreased libido, erectile dysfunction, and ejaculatory dysfunction has been shown to be an important and prevalent concern of prostate cancer survivors. In this literature review, we sought to characterize the sexual complications associated with radiation therapy and map the available sexual rehabilitation options for prostate cancer survivors experiencing sexual dysfunction as a result of radiation therapy. We identified medical, non-biomedical, counseling, and lifestyle modification options for prostate cancer survivors seeking sexual rehabilitation. Future research in this area should address the standardization of sexual side-effect reporting and investigate sexual outcomes and rehabilitation in more diverse groups and of transgender and nonheterosexual prostate cancer survivors.
Collapse
|
7
|
Angarita FA, Zhang Y, Elmi M, Look Hong NJ. Older women's experience with breast cancer treatment: A systematic review of qualitative literature. Breast 2020; 54:293-302. [PMID: 33242756 PMCID: PMC7695983 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Revised: 11/08/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The experience of older women during breast cancer treatment is insufficiently described by quantitative studies. This study aimed to systematically review qualitative data describing factors that influence older women’s (≥65 years old) experience with breast cancer treatment. Methods A systematic review was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (PRISMA) principles. MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and EMBASE were searched (inception – 2020). Quality assessment of essential item reporting was performed using the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) criteria. Common ideas were coded, thematically organized, and synthesized within a theoretical framework. Results Of 7,773 studies identified, twelve were included. The median SRQR score was 13.4 (range 11.3–15.9) (maximum score: 21). Data synthesis revealed that older women experienced breast cancer as a journey with challenges during each phase. During diagnosis, they delayed seeking medical help despite symptoms. Age and experience gave them perspective on the impact of their diagnosis. During decision-making, preconceptions and personal values determined choices. In the treatment phase, women experienced medical and social barriers to care. During the post-treatment phase, many experienced treatment adverse effects, but could move on or compartmentalize as coping mechanisms. Conclusion Older women with breast cancer have unique challenges specific to each phase of their treatment journey. Older women may benefit from proactive treatment discussions with health care providers to address their specific needs, individualize care, and assist with cancer care navigation. Older women have challenges specific to each phase of their treatment journey. Older women experience barriers to care and depended on their social network. Older women could conceptually move on or compartmentalize as coping mechanisms. Physicians should be aware of the unique features of each treatment phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando A Angarita
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5T 1P5, Canada
| | - Yimeng Zhang
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5, Canada
| | - Maryam Elmi
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5T 1P5, Canada
| | - Nicole J Look Hong
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5T 1P5, Canada; Division of General Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Corbett T, Cummings A, Calman L, Farrington N, Fenerty V, Foster C, Richardson A, Wiseman T, Bridges J. Self‐management in older people living with cancer and multi‐morbidity: A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies. Psychooncology 2020; 29:1452-1463. [DOI: 10.1002/pon.5453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2020] [Revised: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa Corbett
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences University of Southampton Southampton UK
- NIHR ARC Wessex University of Southampton UK
| | - Amanda Cummings
- Macmillan Survivorship Research Group University of Southampton Southampton UK
| | - Lynn Calman
- Macmillan Survivorship Research Group University of Southampton Southampton UK
| | - Naomi Farrington
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences University of Southampton Southampton UK
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trusts Southampton UK
| | - Vicky Fenerty
- University of Southampton Library University of Southampton Southampton UK
| | - Claire Foster
- Macmillan Survivorship Research Group University of Southampton Southampton UK
| | - Alison Richardson
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences University of Southampton Southampton UK
- NIHR ARC Wessex University of Southampton UK
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trusts Southampton UK
| | - Theresa Wiseman
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences University of Southampton Southampton UK
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | - Jackie Bridges
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences University of Southampton Southampton UK
- NIHR ARC Wessex University of Southampton UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Adam S, Doege D, Koch-Gallenkamp L, Thong MSY, Bertram H, Eberle A, Holleczek B, Pritzkuleit R, Waldeyer-Sauerland M, Waldmann A, Zeissig SR, Jansen L, Rohrmann S, Brenner H, Arndt V. Age-specific health-related quality of life in disease-free long-term prostate cancer survivors versus male population controls-results from a population-based study. Support Care Cancer 2019; 28:2875-2885. [PMID: 31736000 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-05120-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Accepted: 10/02/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer (PC) and its treatment may affect PC survivors differently with respect to age. However, little is known regarding age-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in PC survivors 5 years or even ≥ 10 years post-diagnosis. METHODS The sample included 1975 disease-free PC survivors (5-16 years post-diagnosis) and 661 cancer-free population controls, recruited from two German population-based studies (CAESAR+, LinDe). HRQoL in both populations was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Additionally, PC survivors completed the PC-specific EORTC QLQ-PR25 questionnaire. Differences in HRQoL between survivors and controls, as well as differences according to age and time since diagnosis were analyzed with multiple regression after adjustment for age, education, stage, and time since diagnosis, where appropriate. RESULTS In general, PC survivors reported HRQoL and symptom-burden levels comparable to the general population, except for significantly poorer social functioning and higher burden for diarrhea and constipation. In age-specific analyses, PC survivors up to 69 years indicated poorer global health and social functioning than population controls. Stratification by time since diagnosis revealed little difference between the subgroups. On PC-specific symptoms, burden was highest for urinary bother and symptoms, and lowest for bowel symptoms. Younger age was associated with less urinary symptoms but higher urinary bother. CONCLUSION Long-term disease-free PC survivors reported overall good HRQoL, but experienced persistent specific detriments. Our data suggest that these detriments do not improve substantially with increasing time since diagnosis. Targeted interventions are recommended to prevent PC-related and treatment-related symptoms becoming chronic and to enhance social functioning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salome Adam
- Unit of Cancer Survivorship, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Hirschengraben 84, 8001, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Daniela Doege
- Division of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Hirschengraben 84, 8001, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lena Koch-Gallenkamp
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Melissa S Y Thong
- Division of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Hirschengraben 84, 8001, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Heike Bertram
- Cancer Registry of North Rhine-Westphalia, Gesundheitscampus 10, 44801, Bochum, Germany
| | - Andrea Eberle
- Bremen Cancer Registry, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Achterstraße 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | - Bernd Holleczek
- Saarland Cancer Registry, Präsident Baltz Straße 5, 66119, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | - Ron Pritzkuleit
- Schleswig-Holstein Cancer Registry, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany
| | | | - Annika Waldmann
- Hamburg Cancer Registry, Billstraße 80, 20539, Hamburg, Germany.,Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Sylke Ruth Zeissig
- Cancer Registry of Rhineland-Palatinate, Große Bleiche 46, 55116, Mainz, Germany
| | - Lina Jansen
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sabine Rohrmann
- Division of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Hirschengraben 84, 8001, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volker Arndt
- Unit of Cancer Survivorship, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Developing a digital intervention for cancer survivors: an evidence-, theory- and person-based approach. NPJ Digit Med 2019; 2:85. [PMID: 31508496 PMCID: PMC6718425 DOI: 10.1038/s41746-019-0163-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2019] [Accepted: 08/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper illustrates a rigorous approach to developing digital interventions using an evidence-, theory- and person-based approach. Intervention planning included a rapid scoping review that identified cancer survivors' needs, including barriers and facilitators to intervention success. Review evidence (N = 49 papers) informed the intervention's Guiding Principles, theory-based behavioural analysis and logic model. The intervention was optimised based on feedback on a prototype intervention through interviews (N = 96) with cancer survivors and focus groups with NHS staff and cancer charity workers (N = 31). Interviews with cancer survivors highlighted barriers to engagement, such as concerns about physical activity worsening fatigue. Focus groups highlighted concerns about support appointment length and how to support distressed participants. Feedback informed intervention modifications, to maximise acceptability, feasibility and likelihood of behaviour change. Our systematic method for understanding user views enabled us to anticipate and address important barriers to engagement. This methodology may be useful to others developing digital interventions.
Collapse
|
11
|
Adam S, Koch‐Gallenkamp L, Bertram H, Eberle A, Holleczek B, Pritzkuleit R, Waldeyer‐Sauerland M, Waldmann A, Zeissig SR, Rohrmann S, Brenner H, Arndt V. Health‐related quality of life in long‐term survivors with localised prostate cancer by therapy—Results from a population‐based study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2019; 28:e13076. [DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2018] [Revised: 04/04/2019] [Accepted: 04/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Salome Adam
- Unit of Cancer Survivorship, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany
- Division of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland
| | - Lena Koch‐Gallenkamp
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany
| | - Heike Bertram
- Cancer Registry of North Rhine‐Westphalia Bochum Germany
| | - Andrea Eberle
- Bremen Cancer Registry, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS Bremen Germany
| | | | | | | | - Annika Waldmann
- Hamburg Cancer Registry Hamburg Germany
- Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology University Lübeck Lübeck Germany
| | | | - Sabine Rohrmann
- Division of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany
- Division of Preventive Oncology German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany
| | - Volker Arndt
- Unit of Cancer Survivorship, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Doege D, Thong MSY, Koch-Gallenkamp L, Bertram H, Eberle A, Holleczek B, Pritzkuleit R, Waldeyer-Sauerland M, Waldmann A, Zeissig SR, Jansen L, Brenner H, Arndt V. Health-related quality of life in long-term disease-free breast cancer survivors versus female population controls in Germany. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 175:499-510. [PMID: 30826935 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05188-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2019] [Accepted: 02/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Little is known about breast cancer (BC) survivors' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) > 5 or even > 10 years past diagnosis. It is of interest whether, in the long run, survivors' HRQoL aligns with that of the general population. Study objectives were to (1) compare disease-free BC survivors' HRQoL to that of non-cancer controls, and (2) compare long-term survivors (LTS, 5-9 years post-diagnosis), very long-term survivors (VLTS, ≥ 10 years post-diagnosis), and controls with respect to their HRQoL. METHODS The samples of 2647 disease-free BC survivors (5-16 years post-diagnosis) and 1005 population controls were recruited in German multi-regional population-based studies. HRQoL was assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Differences in HRQoL were assessed with multiple regression, controlling for age and education. RESULTS Disease-free BC survivors < 80 years (at survey) reported overall global health status/quality of life comparable to controls, but statistically significant lower physical, role, emotional, social, and cognitive functioning. They also indicated more fatigue, insomnia, dyspnoea, and financial difficulties. However, differences were only of trivial or small clinical relevance. At age 80-89, no differences between BC survivors and controls were observed. Deficits in emotional and cognitive functioning and some symptoms (e.g. insomnia and fatigue) persist, as both LTS and VLTS reported more detriments than controls. CONCLUSIONS In view of the persistent, small but significant detriments in disease-free BC survivors' cognitive and emotional functioning and higher symptom burden, possibilities to prevent detriments from becoming chronic should be explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Doege
- Unit of Cancer Survivorship, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Cancer Survivorship (C071), PO Box 10 19 49, 69009, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Melissa Suk-Yin Thong
- Unit of Cancer Survivorship, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lena Koch-Gallenkamp
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heike Bertram
- Cancer Registry of North Rhine-Westphalia, Bochum, Germany
| | - Andrea Eberle
- Bremen Cancer Registry, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Annika Waldmann
- Hamburg Cancer Registry, Ministry of Health and Consumer Protection, Hamburg, Germany
- Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | | | - Lina Jansen
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volker Arndt
- Unit of Cancer Survivorship, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Thong MSY, Wolschon EM, Koch-Gallenkamp L, Waldmann A, Waldeyer-Sauerland M, Pritzkuleit R, Bertram H, Kajüter H, Eberle A, Holleczek B, Zeissig SR, Brenner H, Arndt V. "Still a Cancer Patient"-Associations of Cancer Identity With Patient-Reported Outcomes and Health Care Use Among Cancer Survivors. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2018; 2:pky031. [PMID: 31360857 PMCID: PMC6649846 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pky031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2018] [Revised: 05/24/2018] [Accepted: 06/01/2018] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The concept of cancer identity is gaining attention as more individuals are living with cancer as a chronic illness. Research is limited, and results suggest that a self-identity as “cancer patient” rather than a “cancer survivor” is associated with depression and lower health-related quality of life (HRQL). We aimed to identify factors associated with patient identity and investigate the associations between patient identity and treatment, health care use, psychosocial distress, and HRQL. Methods We used data from the population-based CAncEr Survivorship: A multi-Regional (CAESAR) study. Breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer survivors diagnosed during 1994–2004 completed a postal survey on patient identity, HRQL, psychological distress, and health care use in 2009–2011. We calculated odds ratios and the 95% confidence interval of having a patient identity. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, education, and cancer stage, where appropriate. Results Of the 6057 respondents, colorectal cancer survivors (25%) were least likely to consider themselves patients, and prostate cancer survivors (36%) the most likely. Being male, younger age, comorbidity, higher cancer stage, and disease recurrence were associated with patient identity. Treatment was associated with patient identity, except among female colorectal cancer survivors. Having a patient identity was associated with higher health care use within the past 12 months. Survivors who still consider themselves patients were more likely to be depressed and reported significantly lower HRQL. Conclusions A significant proportion of cancer survivors still consider themselves patients five to 15 years postdiagnosis. Sensitivity to individuals’ self-identity should be considered when exploring their cancer experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa S Y Thong
- Unit of Cancer Survivorship, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva-Maria Wolschon
- Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | | | - Annika Waldmann
- Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.,Hamburg Cancer Registry, Ministry of Health and Consumer Protection, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Heike Bertram
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany.,Cancer Registry of North Rhine-Westphalia, Bochum, Germany
| | | | - Andrea Eberle
- Bremen Cancer Registry, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| | | | | | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Preventive Oncology, DKFZ and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volker Arndt
- Unit of Cancer Survivorship, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
|