1
|
Naert M, Sorouri K, Lanes A, Kempf AM, Chen L, Goldman R, Partridge AH, Ginsburg E, Srouji SS, Walker Z. Impact of a Nurse Navigator Program on Referral Rates and Use of Fertility Preservation Among Female Cancer Patients: A 14-Year Retrospective Cohort Study. Cancer Med 2025; 14:e70529. [PMID: 39887838 PMCID: PMC11782191 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2024] [Revised: 10/31/2024] [Accepted: 11/28/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2025] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Given the known detrimental impact of cancer treatment on fertility, fertility preservation (FP) is recommended for reproductive age patients who are newly diagnosed with cancer. However, the rate of referral to fertility specialists remains suboptimal. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of a dedicated Nurse Navigator Program (NNP) on the rate of referrals and utilization of FP services. METHODS A retrospective cohort study of all women ≥ 18 years old referred for FP consultation with a known cancer diagnosis from 2007 to 2021 at a single, large academic center was conducted. FP referrals for non-cancer indications were excluded. Descriptive statistics were performed including comparing referrals received per 30 days and FP utilization rates pre-NNP (October 2007-September 2013) to post-NNP (October 2013-December 2021). RESULTS A total of 176 patients were included pre-NNP and 990 patients post-NNP. Overall, the mean age at the time of referral was 31.5 ± 6.9 years. The referral rates post-NNP were higher among those without prior exposure to chemotherapy/radiation (0.33 pre-NNP vs. 2.75 post-NNP per 30 days, p < 0.01) and lower among those with prior exposure to chemotherapy/radiation (1.26 pre-NNP vs. 0.70 post-NNP per 30 days, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS After the launch of a dedicated fertility preservation nurse navigation program at our institution, we observed a higher number of referrals for FP as well as greater use of FP overall. While not the only variable that changed during this period, this program has optimized patient care and clinical workflow at our institution and serves as a model for such improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mackenzie Naert
- Brigham and Women's HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Kimia Sorouri
- Dana‐Farber Cancer InstituteBostonMassachusettsUSA
- University of AlbertaEdmontonAlbertaCanada
| | - Andrea Lanes
- Brigham and Women's HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Abigail M. Kempf
- Brigham and Women's HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Lucy Chen
- Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Massachusetts General HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Randi Goldman
- NorthwellNew Hyde ParkNew YorkUSA
- Northwell Health FertilityManhassetNew YorkUSA
| | - Ann H. Partridge
- Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Dana‐Farber Cancer InstituteBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Elizabeth Ginsburg
- Brigham and Women's HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Serene S. Srouji
- Brigham and Women's HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Zachary Walker
- Brigham and Women's HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang HF, Jiang QH, Fang YH, Jin L, Huang GY, Wang J, Bai HF, Miyashita M. Perceptions of Oncology Nurses Regarding Fertility Preservation and Providing Oncofertility Services for Men of Childbearing Age with Cancer. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2023; 38:16-23. [PMID: 34260015 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-021-02070-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
This study investigated the knowledge, thoughts, and attitudes of oncology nurses in China regarding fertility preservation for male cancer patients of childbearing age, and for offering counseling or oncofertility services for the men in their care. Data was collected from 18 oncology nurses in Southwest China through voluntary self-report and in-depth interviews. The qualitative interview data were analyzed using a descriptive phenomenology method based on the lived experience of the nurses. The interviewees commonly reported 6 main concerns regarding fertility preservation (FP): their insufficient knowledge and inadequate nursing education; the importance of offering such services to cancer patients; legal vulnerability if FP information is withheld from patients; the role of the nurse in counseling; and barriers to discussing FP in practice. Nurses had a positive attitude toward FP, but most had no practical role in routinely informing male patients of their options, and the nurses believed that discussion of FP was outside their scope of practice. This study offers insight into the perceptions of oncology nurses in a developing country regarding the provision of FP services for adult male cancer patients. These results lead us to recommend that local fertility nurses should be given new training regarding FP. Furthermore, nurse-led clinics are desirable. Future research should focus on the effectiveness of nurse participation in FP counseling and referral, and how to improve the professional confidence of oncology nurses for addressing FP issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han-Feng Zhang
- Gerontological and Oncology Nursing, Division of Nursing Science, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Qing-Hua Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Ying-Hong Fang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Li Jin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Gui-Yu Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Jing Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Hong-Fang Bai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Mika Miyashita
- Gerontological and Oncology Nursing, Division of Nursing Science, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tomioka A, Obama K, Okada H, Yamauchi E, Iwase K, Maru M. Nurse’s perceptions of support for sexual and reproductive issues in adolescents and young adults with cancer. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0265830. [PMID: 35675269 PMCID: PMC9176807 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Adolescent and young adult (AYA) with cancer are at risk for developing sexual and reproductive problems; therefore, they have special needs. AYA with cancer treated in both pediatric and adult wards are a minority in Japan; thus, accumulating experience for supporting this unique patient population is difficult for nurses. Hence, this study aimed to clarify nurses’ perceptions on support for sexual and reproductive issues among AYA with cancer. A questionnaire survey was administered to nurses at designated cancer hospitals across Japan who had been working for at least 1 year in a department involved in the treatment or follow-up of patients aged 15–39 years. Nurses were asked regarding their perceptions on support for sexual and reproductive issues faced by AYA with cancer. A total of 865 nurses responded to this survey; nurses affiliated with adult departments, those with more experience in cancer nursing, those affiliated with cancer-related academic and professional societies, and certified nurse specialists or certified nurses significantly recognized insufficient support for sexual and reproductive issues. However, nurses were hesitant and found it difficult to intervene in such issues. Nurses recognized the importance of providing support for sexual and reproductive issues but faced difficulties in addressing them. They need to discuss these issues and improve the care provided to AYA with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akiko Tomioka
- Faculty of Healthcare, Tokyo Healthcare University, Tokyo, Japan
- * E-mail:
| | - Kyoko Obama
- Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiromi Okada
- Faculty of Healthcare, Tokyo Healthcare University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Eiko Yamauchi
- Faculty of Medicine, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan
| | - Kimiko Iwase
- Faculty of Nursing & Rehabilitation, Konan Women’s University, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Mitsue Maru
- College of Nursing Art & Science, University of Hyogo, Kobe, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sisk BA, Harvey K, Friedrich AB, Antes AL, Yaeger LH, Mack JW, DuBois J. Multilevel barriers and facilitators of communication in pediatric oncology: A systematic review. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2022; 69:e29405. [PMID: 34662485 PMCID: PMC8875310 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.29405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Revised: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Multiple factors can facilitate or impede the fulfillment of communication functions in pediatric cancer. In this systematic review, we evaluated 109 studies from the preceding 20 years that presented qualitative or quantitative evidence of barriers or facilitators to communication in pediatric cancer. Using a multilevel framework developed in our prior study, we then analyzed and categorized the levels of barriers and facilitators identified in included studies. The vast majority of studies focused on individual-level barriers, rather than team, organization/system, collaborating hospital, community, or policy-level barriers. Future studies should explore the full range of factors that affect communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan A. Sisk
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.,Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Kieandra Harvey
- Brown School of Social Work, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Annie B. Friedrich
- Albert Gnaegi Center for Health Care Ethics, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Alison L. Antes
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Lauren H Yaeger
- Bernard Becker Medical Library, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Jennifer W. Mack
- Pediatric Oncology and Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; and Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - James DuBois
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Heritage SR, Feast A, Mourad M, Smith L, Hatcher H, Critoph DJ. Documentation of Oncofertility Communication in Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2021; 11:275-283. [PMID: 34494900 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2021.0087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Increasing numbers of adolescents and young adults with cancer (AYACs) are surviving long term, highlighting the importance of effective oncofertility communication. We undertook this study to understand documentation of fertility discussions with AYACs, what options are offered, and how this differs for AYACs on treatment compared with those post-treatment. Methods: We reviewed the documentation of fertility discussions with 122 AYACs treated between 2000 and 2020: 72 AYACs on treatment and 50 AYACs at least 3 years post-treatment ("late effects" cohort). Results: Diagnoses were split evenly between hematological and solid tumor diagnoses, and biological sex. Seventy-five percent of patients were diagnosed and treated by the AYAC team and 25% by the pediatric team. Median age at diagnosis was 19 years (range 4-24) for on-treatment patients and 16 years (range 3-25) for late effects patients. Fertility was discussed with 93% of on-treatment patients and 48% of late effects patients. Seventy-nine percent of on-treatment patients and 48% of late effects patients pursued a pre-treatment fertility preservation option. Post-treatment, 84% of late effects patients had a discussion and 57% pursued an option. Only four patients across both cohorts underwent oocyte or ovarian tissue cryopreservation. Those referred to specialist reproductive medicine clinics had more detailed documentation about fertility discussions. Nurse-led late effects clinics had a key role in facilitating post-treatment discussions. Conclusions: It is important to communicate oncofertility options to AYACs repeatedly throughout treatment. Referral to specialist oncofertility services and adequate information for both sexes is important pre-treatment, and can be facilitated post-treatment by a late effects service.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie R Heritage
- Department of Oncology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Alice Feast
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Mariam Mourad
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Luke Smith
- Department of Oncology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Helen Hatcher
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Deborah J Critoph
- Department of Oncology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.,Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Crespi C, Adams L, Gray TF, Azizoddin DR. An Integrative Review of the Role of Nurses in Fertility Preservation for Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 2021; 48:491-505. [PMID: 34411081 DOI: 10.1188/21.onf.491-505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer commonly report future fertility as an important issue in care. Despite long-standing guidelines on fertility counseling and the trusting relationship between nurses and patients, little is known about the nurse's role in fertility preservation (FP) for AYAs with cancer. LITERATURE SEARCH The authors conducted a literature search of articles published through 2020 focused on nursing involvement in FP for AYAs with cancer. DATA EVALUATION 85 studies were identified. In total, 11 articles met inclusion criteria and were critically appraised in the review. SYNTHESIS Although well positioned to improve FP care among AYAs with cancer, nurses currently have a minimal role because of provider, institutional, and patient-related barriers. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Interventions to enhance nurses' knowledge about FP, improvements in electronic health record documentation, and facilitation of institutional support are needed to support the nurse's role in FP for AYAs with cancer.
Collapse
|
7
|
Lien C, Huang S, Hua Chen Y, Cheng W. Evidenced-based practice of decision-making process in oncofertility care among registered nurses: A qualitative study. Nurs Open 2021; 8:799-807. [PMID: 33570287 PMCID: PMC7877121 DOI: 10.1002/nop2.684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Revised: 09/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM The purpose of our study was to construct the context of the nursing action/role in oncofertility care. DESIGN Qualitative research. METHODS We applied grounded theory to guide the qualitative study. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with 12 nurses in Taipei. The data were collected from August 2018 to February 2019. RESULTS The core theme that described the role of nurses' decision-making in oncofertility care focused on understanding oncofertility from the self to the other. Care roles or actions in oncofertility that involved the process of psychological cognition were divided into four dimensions: perceiving the patient's changes and needs, triggering the self's emotions, empathizing with patient's situations and introspective care roles. Nurses who had experienced the phase of empathizing with the patient's situations developed more diverse roles and had positive actions toward oncofertility care. Based on the psychological changes for oncofertility decision-making process, implementing contextual training in oncofertility could help nurses create more positive actions in oncofertility care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Yi Hua Chen
- Department of NursingMackay Medical CollegeNew Taipei CityTaiwan
| | - Wen‐Ting Cheng
- Department of NursingMacKay Memorial HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Norton W, Wright E. Barriers and Facilitators to Fertility-Related Discussions with Teenagers and Young Adults with Cancer: Nurses' Experiences. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2020; 9:481-489. [PMID: 32155354 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2019.0092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Improvements in cancer survival rates for teenagers and young adults (TYAs) have resulted in quality-of-life issues into survivorship becoming increasingly important. However, infertility is a potential late side effect of cancer treatment, which can negatively impact on quality of life. Advances in assisted reproductive technologies have resulted in increasingly effective fertility preservation (FP) options. Purpose: This study aimed to explore nurses' experiences of undertaking fertility-related discussions with TYAs with cancer aged 13-24 years. Methods: An interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA) approach was used. Eleven purposively selected nurses working on a specialist TYA cancer unit participated in semistructured interviews. Data were analyzed using IPA. Results: Parents/family were experienced as self-appointed informal gatekeepers who were perceived to hold the power to control nurses' access to communicate with young people about fertility issues. Nurses adopted a supportive role, which was enhanced by the positive nature of their relationship with the TYA. Uncertainty was expressed over whether the TYA had been fully informed of their infertility risk and potential FP options. Conclusions: Nurses should manage parental involvement sensitively if TYAs are to make informed decisions regarding their future reproductive health. There is a need for clear role delineation in fertility discussions to ensure that TYAs are provided with the opportunity to discuss infertility risk and be referred to a specialist before initiating cancer treatment. Nurses should cultivate the primacy of the nurse-TYA relationship to improve fertility care. Further research into the factors that TYAs may consider beneficial within the nurse-patient relationship is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy Norton
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, The Leicester School of Nursing and Midwifery, De Montfort University, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Elaine Wright
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, The Leicester School of Nursing and Midwifery, De Montfort University, Leicester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Papadopoulou C, Sime C, Rooney K, Kotronoulas G. Sexual health care provision in cancer nursing care: A systematic review on the state of evidence and deriving international competencies chart for cancer nurses. Int J Nurs Stud 2019; 100:103405. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2018] [Revised: 07/02/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
10
|
Semler R, Thom B. Fertility Preservation: Improving Access Through Nurse-Advocated Financial Assistance. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2019; 23:27-30. [PMID: 31538989 DOI: 10.1188/19.cjon.s2.27-30] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Young adult patients and survivors may face impaired fertility or infertility as a result of their cancer treatment, and many will need costly assisted reproductive technology to build their families. Fertility nurse specialists (FNSs) can play a role in alleviating the distress associated with the co-occurrence of financial toxicity and impaired fertility/infertility. OBJECTIVES This article describes a nurse-led oncofertility program that offers counseling to patients of any age, with any diagnosis, and at any stage of treatment. METHODS An overview of the literature and a description of a clinical practice, including relevant case studies, are presented. FINDINGS FNSs can seek to lessen the financial burden associated with family building before and after cancer treatment by developing a network of reproductive specialists who will provide discounted services and by sharing information on available resources that might reduce the costs.
Collapse
|
11
|
Anazodo A, Laws P, Logan S, Saunders C, Travaglia J, Gerstl B, Bradford N, Cohn R, Birdsall M, Barr R, Suzuki N, Takae S, Marinho R, Xiao S, Qiong-Hua C, Mahajan N, Patil M, Gunasheela D, Smith K, Sender L, Melo C, Almeida-Santos T, Salama M, Appiah L, Su I, Lane S, Woodruff TK, Pacey A, Anderson RA, Shenfield F, Ledger W, Sullivan E. How can we improve oncofertility care for patients? A systematic scoping review of current international practice and models of care. Hum Reprod Update 2019; 25:159-179. [PMID: 30462263 PMCID: PMC6390168 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmy038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 129] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2018] [Revised: 10/15/2018] [Accepted: 10/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fertility preservation (FP) is an important quality of life issue for cancer survivors of reproductive age. Despite the existence of broad international guidelines, the delivery of oncofertility care, particularly amongst paediatric, adolescent and young adult patients, remains a challenge for healthcare professionals (HCPs). The quality of oncofertility care is variable and the uptake and utilization of FP remains low. Available guidelines fall short in providing adequate detail on how oncofertility models of care (MOC) allow for the real-world application of guidelines by HCPs. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature on the components of oncofertility care as defined by patient and clinician representatives, and identify the barriers, facilitators and challenges, so as to improve the implementation of oncofertility services. SEARCH METHODS A systematic scoping review was conducted on oncofertility MOC literature published in English between 2007 and 2016, relating to 10 domains of care identified through consumer research: communication, oncofertility decision aids, age-appropriate care, referral pathways, documentation, training, supportive care during treatment, reproductive care after cancer treatment, psychosocial support and ethical practice of oncofertility care. A wide range of electronic databases (CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed, AEIPT, Education Research Complete, ProQuest and VOCED) were searched in order to synthesize the evidence around delivery of oncofertility care. Related citations and reference lists were searched. The review was undertaken following registration (International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) registration number CRD42017055837) and guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). OUTCOMES A total of 846 potentially relevant studies were identified after the removal of duplicates. All titles and abstracts were screened by a single reviewer and the final 147 papers were screened by two reviewers. Ten papers on established MOC were identified amongst the included papers. Data were extracted from each paper and quality scores were then summarized in the oncofertility MOC summary matrix. The results identified a number of themes for improving MOC in each domain, which included: the importance of patients receiving communication that is of a higher quality and in different formats on their fertility risk and FP options; improving provision of oncofertility care in a timely manner; improving access to age-appropriate care; defining the role and scope of practice of all HCPs; and improving communication between different HCPs. Different forms of decision aids were found useful for assisting patients to understand FP options and weigh up choices. WIDER IMPLICATIONS This analysis identifies core components for delivery of oncofertility MOC. The provision of oncofertility services requires planning to ensure services have safe and reliable referral pathways and that they are age-appropriate and include medical and psychological oncofertility care into the survivorship period. In order for this to happen, collaboration needs to occur between clinicians, allied HCPs and executives within paediatric and adult hospitals, as well as fertility clinics across both public and private services. Training of both cancer and non-cancer HCPs is needed to improve the knowledge of HCPs, the quality of care provided and the confidence of HCPs with these consultations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoinette Anazodo
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, High Street Randwick, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Nelune Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Barker Street, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Botany Street, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Paula Laws
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, High Street Randwick, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Shanna Logan
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Botany Street, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Fertility and Research Centre, Royal Hospital for Women, Barker Street, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Carla Saunders
- Centre for Health Services Management, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, 15 Broadway, Ultimo, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jo Travaglia
- Centre for Health Services Management, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, 15 Broadway, Ultimo, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Brigitte Gerstl
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, High Street Randwick, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Nelune Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Barker Street, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Natalie Bradford
- Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Richard Cohn
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, High Street Randwick, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Botany Street, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mary Birdsall
- Fertility Associates, 7 Ellerslie Racecourse Drive, Auckland City, New Zealand
| | - Ronald Barr
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nao Suzuki
- St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Kawasaki Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan
| | - Seido Takae
- St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Kawasaki Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan
| | - Ricardo Marinho
- Pro Criar Medicina Reprodutiva, Rua Bernardo Guimarães 2063, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Shuo Xiao
- Reproductive Health and Toxicology Lab, Dept. Environmental Health Sciences, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Discovery I, 915 Greene St, Rm 327, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Chen Qiong-Hua
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, 55 Zhenhai Road, Siming Qu, Xiamen Shi 35, China
| | - Nalini Mahajan
- Mother and Child Hospital, D-59 Defence Colony, New Delhi, India
| | - Madhuri Patil
- Dr. Patil’s Fertility and Endoscopy Center, Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology, Endoscopic Surgery and Andrology, Bangalore, India
| | - Devika Gunasheela
- Gunasheela Surgical & Maternity Hospital, No. 1, Dewan Madhava Road, Opp. M. N. Krishna Rao Park, Basavanagudi, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Kristen Smith
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University, 420 E Superior Street, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Leonard Sender
- Children’s Hospital Orange County, 1201 W La Veta Avenue, Orange, CA, USA
| | - Cláudia Melo
- Centro de Preservação da Fertilidade, Serviço de Medicina da Reprodução, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Edifício de São Jerónimo, Piso 2, Praceta Professor Mota Pinto, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Teresa Almeida-Santos
- Centro de Preservação da Fertilidade, Serviço de Medicina da Reprodução, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Edifício de São Jerónimo, Piso 2, Praceta Professor Mota Pinto, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Mahmoud Salama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University, 420 E Superior Street, Chicago, IL, USA
- Reproductive Medicine Department, National Research Center, Buhouth Street 33, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Leslie Appiah
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center–James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA
- Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Department of Paediatric Surgery, 700 Children’s Drive, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Irene Su
- University of California San Diego, 355 Dickinson St # 315, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Sheila Lane
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Headley Way, Headington, Oxford, UK
- University of Oxford, Wellington Square, Oxford, UK
| | - Teresa K Woodruff
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University, 420 E Superior Street, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Allan Pacey
- Academic Unit of Reproductive and Developmental Medicine, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Level 4, The Jessop Wing, Tree Root Walk, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK
| | - Richard A Anderson
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, The Queen’s Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh University, 47 Little France Crescent, Scotland, UK
| | - Francoise Shenfield
- Reproductive Medicine Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Wing, University College London Hospital, 25 Grafton Way, London, UK
| | - William Ledger
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Botany Street, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Fertility and Research Centre, Royal Hospital for Women, Barker Street, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Sullivan
- Australian Centre for Public and Population Health Research, Faculty of Health, University of Technology, 15 Broadway, Ultimo, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Yanamandra U, Saini N, Chauhan P, Sharma T, Khadwal A, Prakash G, Varma N, Lad D, Varma S, Malhotra P. AYA-Myeloma: Real-World, Single-Center Experience Over Last 5 Years. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2017; 7:120-124. [PMID: 28829925 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2017.0034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Multiple myeloma (MM) is considered as a disease of the old with the reported median age of 60-70 years. The disease occurred a decade earlier in the Indian subcontinent. The literature on MM in adolescents and young adult (AYA) is limited. We studied the disease characteristics and outcomes of the AYA-MM in the real-world setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS It is a retrospective single-center study conducted at a tertiary care center from North India. Records of all consecutive patients with AYA-MM (15-39 years of age) who were managed from January 1, 2010, to December 30, 2015, were reviewed. Survival was assessed from the date of start of treatment to the last follow-up date or death due to any cause. RESULTS A total of 415 patients managed for MM were included in the study. The frequency of the AYA-MM was 9.6% (40/415) of whom 5 patients were younger than 30 years. There was male preponderance with a median age of the patients being 38 years. The main presenting features were bone pain (55%), fatigue (45%), extramedullary plasmacytomas (20%), and infections (12%) and referral from the peripheral hospital as renal dysfunction (58%). On the evaluation of patients, hypercalcemia, renal impairment, anemia, and lytic lesions were seen in 24.32%, 30%, 52.5%, and 59.25% of patients, respectively. The majority had the high-risk disease (International Staging System [ISS]-III: 75%). Only 22.5% patients were transplanted. The 3-year median overall survival of the study population was 80.21%. CONCLUSION AYA-MM patients have a higher prevalence of extramedullary disease and high-risk disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uday Yanamandra
- 1 Clinical Hematology Division , Department of Internal Medicine, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | - Neha Saini
- 1 Clinical Hematology Division , Department of Internal Medicine, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | - Pooja Chauhan
- 1 Clinical Hematology Division , Department of Internal Medicine, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | - Tanya Sharma
- 2 Department of Internal Medicine, Government Medical College and Hospital (GMCH) , Chandigarh, Punjab, India
| | - Alka Khadwal
- 1 Clinical Hematology Division , Department of Internal Medicine, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | - Gaurav Prakash
- 1 Clinical Hematology Division , Department of Internal Medicine, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | - Neelam Varma
- 3 Department of Hematology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | - Deepesh Lad
- 1 Clinical Hematology Division , Department of Internal Medicine, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | - Subhash Varma
- 1 Clinical Hematology Division , Department of Internal Medicine, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | - Pankaj Malhotra
- 1 Clinical Hematology Division , Department of Internal Medicine, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Grabowski MC, Spitzer DA, Stutzman SE, Olson DM. Development of an Instrument to Examine Nursing Attitudes Toward Fertility Preservation in Oncology. Oncol Nurs Forum 2017. [PMID: 28632245 DOI: 10.1188/17.onf.497-502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES To develop an instrument to measure staff nurse perceptions of the barriers to and benefits of addressing fertility preservation (FP) with patients newly diagnosed with cancer.
. DESIGN A prospective, nonrandomized instrument development approach.
. SETTING Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas.
. SAMPLE 224 RNs who care for patients with cancer.
. METHODS The instrument was developed with content experts and field-tested with oncology staff nurses. Responses to a web-based survey were used in exploratory factor analysis. After refining the instrument, the authors conducted a confirmatory factor analysis with 230 web-based survey responses.
. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES Self-perceived barriers to providing FP options to patients newly diagnosed with cancer.
. FINDINGS The results supported a 15-item instrument with five domains. CONCLUSIONS This instrument can be used to explore oncology nurses' attitudes toward FP in newly diagnosed people with cancer in their reproductive years.
. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING A more comprehensive understanding of attitudes and barriers related to FP will guide the building of optimal systems that support effective FP options, resources, and programs for individuals with cancer.
Collapse
|