Oncology Nurses' Attitudes Toward the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System: Results From a Large Cancer Care Ontario Study

Designing and Validating a Comprehensive Patient-Reported Outcomes Measure for Ambulatory Cancer Settings: The Revised Edmonton Symptom Assessment System for Cancer

PURPOSE

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) information has been routinely collected in Cancer Care Alberta (CCA) for years using the revised Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS-r) and Canadian Problem Checklist (CPC). There was interest in combining these into a more comprehensive single measure tailored to ambulatory cancer settings. The purpose of this study was to validate an expanded and redesigned ESAS-r called the ESAS-r Cancer.

METHODS

Stakeholder engagement, a review of the literature, and 2 years of CPC data collected in the cancer program informed the addition of six symptoms to the ESAS-r. To assess and validate the measure, 1,600 randomly sampled patients were mailed paper copies of the ESAS-r Cancer, ESAS-r, and a validated, comprehensive PRO measure called the Memorial System Assessment Scale-Short Form (MSAS-SF), which is often used with patients with cancer. Canonical Correlation Analysis and exploratory factor analyses were performed to assess concurrent and construct validity of the ESAS-r Cancer against ESAS-r, using MSAS-SF as the reference measure for comparison. Cronbach α was calculated to assess reliability.

RESULTS

Four hundred and sixty-one patients (29% response rate) completed all three questionnaires. ESAS-r Cancer showed higher numerical correlation than ESAS-r and accounted for more information included on MSAS-SF, explaining slightly more variance than ESAS-r (75.2% v 73.5%). The three-dimensional factor structure of ESAS-r Cancer outperformed the two-dimensional factor structure of ESAS-r. The reliability of ESAS-r Cancer was verified and found to be slightly higher than ESAS-r (Cronbach α = .903 v .884).

CONCLUSION

ESAS-r Cancer is now in use with patients throughout CCA. This valid and reliable PRO measure can be used by other cancer or specialized health care programs who wish to routinely assess common symptoms.

Establishment and analysis of quality index system for pediatric tumor nursing

BACKGROUND

Nursing management considers nursing quality management at its core. Evaluation indexes of nursing quality not only control nursing quality, measure work enthusiasm, and judge the difference in nursing levels but also help nurses accurately understand the satisfaction degree of patients.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze pediatric tumor nursing quality evaluation indexes and establish a scientific and rigorous index system of children's nursing quality.

METHODS

  Based on the "structure-process-result" in this study, the Delphi method was used to carry out questionnaire investigations and opinion collection for domestic experts in pediatrics, pediatric oncology internal medicine, and pediatric oncology surgical care and clinical aspects two times. In addition, the Kendall coordination coefficient and analytic hierarchy process were used to determine the content of indicators at all levels, set the weight, and finally establish the quality index system of pediatric tumor nursing.

RESULTS

The response rate of 27 experts in the first round of the questionnaire was 100%, Ca0.77, Cs,0.73, Cr0.75, and the W value of the expert coordination coefficient was 0.315. In the second round of 27 expert consultations, the reply rate was 96%, Ca0.81, Cs0.80, Cr0.805, and the specialist coordination coefficient W value was 0.369. After two rounds of consultation, the importance evaluation scores of each indicator ranged from 3.31 to 4.88 and 3.29 to 5.00, respectively, and more than 94.7% of the indicators' importance evaluation scores were higher than 3.50. Finally, 3 Level-1 indicators, 12 Level-2 indicators, and 54 Level-3 indicators are established.

CONCLUSION

This study has established a simple, comprehensive, and scientific quality index system for pediatric tumor nursing, highlighted the characteristics of pediatric tumor nursing, and provided an evaluation system for specialized nursing of pediatric tumors to more standardized pediatric tumor nursing and contribute to the sustainable and scientific development of pediatric tumor nursing.

Perceived Barriers and Facilitators in Using Patient-Reported Outcome Systems for Cancer Care: Systematic Mapping Study

BACKGROUND

Cancer is a major global health problem. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) systems have been developed to support the treatment of patients with cancer. Although clear evidence of the benefits of the routine use of electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) exists, engaging physicians in using these systems has been challenging.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to identify and analyze what is currently known about health care professionals' (HCPs) perceived barriers and facilitators that exist and influence the use of ePRO systems for cancer care.

METHODS

We carried out a systematic mapping study by conducting searches of 3 databases (Association for Computing Machinery, PubMed, and Scopus). Eligible papers were published between 2010 and 2021, and they described HCPs' perspectives on using ePROs. The data on the included papers were extracted, a thematic meta-synthesis was performed, and 7 themes were summarized into 3 categories.

RESULTS

A total of 17 papers were included in the study. The HCPs' perceived barriers and facilitators of using ePROs can be summarized into 7 themes: clinical workflow, organization and infrastructure, value to patients, value to HCPs, digital health literacy, usability, and data visualization and perceived features. These themes can be further summarized into 3 categories: work environment, value to users, and suggested features. According to the study, ePROs should be interoperable with hospital electronic health records and adapted to the hospital workflow. HCPs should get appropriate support for their use. Additional features are needed for ePROs, and special attention should be paid to data visualization. Patients should have the option to use web-based ePROs at home and complete it at the time most valuable to the treatment. Patients' ePRO notes need attention during clinical visits, but ePRO use should not limit patient-clinician face-to-face communication.

CONCLUSIONS

The study revealed that several aspects need improvement in ePROs and their operating environments. By improving these aspects, HCPs' experience with ePROs will enhance, and thus, there will be more facilitating factors for HCPs to use ePROs than those available today. More national and international knowledge about using ePROs is still needed to cover the need for information to develop them and their operating environments to meet the needs of HCPs.

Cancer Patients' Satisfaction with In-Home Palliative Care and Its Impact on Disease Symptoms

The aim of the study was to determine whether the satisfaction of cancer patients with in-home palliative care is associated with the impact of disease symptoms and with self-perceived quality of life. This was a cross-sectional descriptive study, conducted in the primary health care sector in six clinical management units, where 72 patients were recruited over a period of six months. The severity of symptoms was determined by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS). Quality of life was evaluated with the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3) questionnaire, and patients' satisfaction with the care received was evaluated by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8). The patients' satisfaction with the health care received was represented by an average score of 6, on a scale of 1-10; thus, there is room for improvement in patient satisfaction. Moreover, it was found that more intense symptoms and lower quality of life are associated with lower satisfaction with health care received (p = 0.001). Similarly, when symptoms are more severe, the quality of life is lower (p < 0.001). The identification of fatigue, reduced well-being, pain, drowsiness, and depression as the symptoms experienced with the highest intensity by our patients provides valuable information for health care providers in developing individualized symptom management plans for patients with advanced cancer.

Implementation of electronic prospective surveillance models in cancer care: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Electronic prospective surveillance models (ePSMs) for cancer rehabilitation include routine monitoring of the development of treatment toxicities and impairments via electronic patient-reported outcomes. Implementing ePSMs to address the knowledge-to-practice gap between the high incidence of impairments and low uptake of rehabilitation services is a top priority in cancer care.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review to understand the state of the evidence concerning the implementation of ePSMs in oncology. Seven electronic databases were searched from inception to February 2021. All articles were screened and extracted by two independent reviewers. Data regarding the implementation strategies, outcomes, and determinants were extracted. The Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change taxonomy and the implementation outcomes taxonomy guided the synthesis of the implementation strategies and outcomes, respectively. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guided the synthesis of determinants based on five domains (intervention characteristics, individual characteristics, inner setting, outer setting, and process).

RESULTS

Of the 5122 records identified, 46 interventions met inclusion criteria. The common implementation strategies employed were "conduct educational meetings," "distribute educational materials," "change record systems," and "intervene with patients to enhance uptake and adherence." Feasibility and acceptability were the prominent outcomes used to assess implementation. The complexity, relative advantage, design quality, and packaging were major implementation determinants at the intervention level. Knowledge was key at the individual level. At the inner setting level, major determinants were the implementation climate and readiness for implementation. At the outer setting level, meeting the needs of patients was the primary determinant. Engaging various stakeholders was key at the process level.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides a comprehensive summary of what is known concerning the implementation of ePSMs. The results can inform future implementation and evaluation of ePSMs, including planning for key determinants, selecting implementation strategies, and considering outcomes alongside local contextual factors to guide the implementation process.

The Therapy-Related Symptom Checklist for Children as a Method for Monitoring Symptoms in Chinese Children With Cancer: Linguistic Validation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation

BACKGROUND

Children with cancer commonly experience severe symptoms. These may be managed by routine monitoring of their occurrence andseverity using a validated tool.

AIM

This study aimed to translate and culturally validate a simplified Chinese version of the Therapy-Related Symptom Checklist for Children (TRSC-C).

DESIGN

Qualitative method.

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING

We recruited children with cancer from a pediatric department of a tertiary hospital in Guangzhou, China.

METHODS

We used forward and backward translation by bilingual translators and standardized cognitive interviewing for linguistic validation and to check cross-cultural adaptation. A panel of experts assessed content validity.

RESULTS

Agreement was reached on cultural applicability, suitability for intended purpose, and clarification of the pre-test version. The content validity was good (indices ranged from 0.80-0.90). Fifteen Chinese children with cancer (aged 8-18 years) were included in cognitive interviews. The cognitive debriefing showed that the instrument was easy to understand and appropriate for monitoring symptoms in children with cancer. Some words were adjusted following participants' comments.

CONCLUSIONS

The simplified Chinese version of the TRSC-C was semantically and conceptually equivalent to the original version. Children between 8-18 years old can use this instrument to report symptoms and share their experiences about their disease and treatment.

Use of a Symptom Diary on Oncology Wards: Effect on Symptom Management and Recommendations for Implementation

BACKGROUND

Management of symptoms is essential in reducing the symptom burden of cancer patients. The effect of symptom diaries on symptom management to date has been evaluated only in ambulatory settings.

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to identify the key facilitators for successful implementation of symptom diaries on oncology wards from patients' and professionals' perspectives and to evaluate implementation outcomes.

METHODS

In 2 cycles of action research, the Utrecht Symptom Diary (USD) was implemented on 3 oncology wards and a daycare unit. Key facilitators for implementation were identified by thematic coding of interviews. The effect of the implementation was evaluated in cycle II in a pretest-posttest design. We performed statistical tests (Mann-Whitney/t test/χ2) on Symptom Management Performance items in questionnaires and medical records.

RESULTS

We interviewed 25 patients, 8 doctors, and 25 nurses. Seven key facilitators for implementation emerged. After implementation of the USD in cycle II, Symptom Management Performance was significantly (P < .05) improved for patients (3/12 items, n = 33 pretest/26 posttest) and professionals (6/12 items, n = 21 pretest/19 posttest). Significantly more symptoms (P = .00), working hypotheses (P = .023), treatment plans (P = .00), and interventions (P = .00) were reported (n = 47 pretest/47 posttest).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of the USD significantly improved symptom management in oncology wards. We recommend (1) using a diagnosis-specific diary; (2) making clear, individualized working-arrangements; (3) training professionals; (4) using the plan-do-check-act cycle; (5) acting multidisciplinary; (6) providing guidelines and training; and (7) assuring adequate information communications technology (ICT).

IMPLICATIONS

Symptom diaries are increasingly used, but implementation is challenging. This study provides knowledge on their benefits and an evidence-based strategy for implementation with positive outcomes achieved in patient care.

How do patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) support clinician-patient communication and patient care? A realist synthesis

BACKGROUND

In this paper, we report the findings of a realist synthesis that aimed to understand how and in what circumstances patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) support patient-clinician communication and subsequent care processes and outcomes in clinical care. We tested two overarching programme theories: (1) PROMs completion prompts a process of self-reflection and supports patients to raise issues with clinicians and (2) PROMs scores raise clinicians' awareness of patients' problems and prompts discussion and action. We examined how the structure of the PROM and care context shaped the ways in which PROMs support clinician-patient communication and subsequent care processes.

RESULTS

PROMs completion prompts patients to reflect on their health and gives them permission to raise issues with clinicians. However, clinicians found standardised PROMs completion during patient assessments sometimes constrained rather than supported communication. In response, clinicians adapted their use of PROMs to render them compatible with the ongoing management of patient relationships. Individualised PROMs supported dialogue by enabling the patient to tell their story. In oncology, PROMs completion outside of the consultation enabled clinicians to identify problematic symptoms when the PROM acted as a substitute rather than addition to the clinical encounter and when the PROM focused on symptoms and side effects, rather than health related quality of life (HRQoL). Patients did not always feel it was appropriate to discuss emotional, functional or HRQoL issues with doctors and doctors did not perceive this was within their remit.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper makes two important contributions to the literature. First, our findings show that PROMs completion is not a neutral act of information retrieval but can change how patients think about their condition. Second, our findings reveal that the ways in which clinicians use PROMs is shaped by their relationships with patients and professional roles and boundaries. Future research should examine how PROMs completion and feedback shapes and is influenced by the process of building relationships with patients, rather than just their impact on information exchange and decision making.