Oral Chemotherapy: A Home Safety Educational Framework for Healthcare Providers, Patients, and Caregivers

Adherence to Oral Anticancer Agents Among Adults With Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Patients with gastrointestinal tract cancer reported suboptimal adherence to oral anticancer agents (OAAs), reducing their therapeutic benefit and increasing mortality risk. A scoping review can comprehensively map available evidence on adherence to OAAs and inform appropriate support to improve treatment outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to comprehensively map studies on adherence to OAAs among adults with gastrointestinal tract cancer, including the adherence rate, nonadherence reasons, influential factors, management strategies, and theories that guide these studies.

METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews Checklist and the 5-stage methodological framework of scoping review were followed. According to the 5 research questions, 7 databases were systematically searched for peer-reviewed original studies, and a narrative synthesis was performed.

RESULTS

Fifty-two studies were included. Adherence ranged from 16.7% to 100%, giving a median rate of 68% by self-report. Seven categories of nonadherence reasons were identified, with adverse effects, cancer progression, patient refusal, and forgetfulness being most frequently reported. Furthermore, more than 40 influential factors were identified. They are related to patient, disease condition, therapy, socioeconomic, and healthcare-system dimensions. Education and follow-up care were the main components of management strategies, but the effectiveness was inconsistent. Currently, only 3 of 52 studies adopted theoretical frameworks.

CONCLUSION

Adherence to OAAs among adults with gastrointestinal tract cancer is suboptimal. Future studies with rigorous designs and theoretical frameworks are needed to develop adherence-enhancing strategies and explain theoretical mechanisms.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Routine assessments and preventive actions are suggested to delay modifiable nonadherence.

Associations of readiness for hospital discharge with symptoms and non-routine utilization of post-discharge services among cancer patients receiving oral chemotherapy at home: A prospective study

BACKGROUND

Readiness for hospital discharge is associated with patients' health outcomes after they return home. However, little is known about this association among cancer patients receiving oral chemotherapy at home. This study aimed to examine whether patients' reported readiness for hospital discharge was associated with symptoms and non-routine utilization of post-discharge services among cancer patients receiving oral chemotherapy at home.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted, and 151 cancer patients receiving oral chemotherapy were recruited from a provincial level hospital in South China between October 2018 and December 2019. The primary outcome was readiness for hospital discharge assessed by the Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale-Short Form on the day of discharge. The secondary endpoints were symptoms assessed by MD Anderson Symptom Inventory and non-routine utilization of post-discharge services within one cycle of chemotherapy at home (21 days).

RESULTS

Among these 151 participants, 74.2% of them reported as ready for discharge. Patients who were employed, lived in suburban area or villages, had a higher Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score, took Tegafur as oral chemotherapy, and took oral chemotherapy for the first time reported lower readiness for hospital discharge. These five factors explained 28.1% of variance in readiness for hospital discharge. Patients who were not ready for discharge were prone to report higher symptom severity (p = 0.038). No differences in non-routine utilization of post-discharge services were found between the readiness versus non-readiness for discharge groups (p = 0.891).

CONCLUSIONS

Most cancer patients receiving oral chemotherapy at home were ready for discharge, which was influenced by employment status, residence status, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score, type of oral chemotherapy drug, and the experience of taking oral chemotherapy at home. Patients with lower readiness reported worse symptom severity at home. Routine assessment was suggested to recognize unready patients, and more extensive preparations for discharge were recommended to help them manage symptoms at home.

Improved home management of oral pediatric anticancer drugs as a result of an intervention comprising practical training, written instructions and movie clips: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Long term treatment of pediatric patients with oral anticancer drugs (OADs) requires the parents/caregivers to prepare the drug at home. The handling procedures in the home setting are, however, not regulated by Swedish law and the parents are often left without guidance on how to handle OADs in a safe way.

AIM

The aim of this study was to increase understanding of how OADs are handled by parents/caregivers in the home setting before and after an intervention.

METHODS

Parents of pediatric cancer patients were observed and videotaped during their handling of OADs in the home setting before and after the intervention. During the intervention, the parents were provided with written instructions, movie clips and practical training on handling the OADs. Four checklists were used to compare and score the four handling procedures (measuring an oral suspension, cutting tablets, dissolving tablets, and opening capsules) for each parent before and after the intervention.

RESULTS

The intervention significantly improved the OAD handling procedures among the studied parents. The median score for correct handling was 19% (IQR: 3.6 to 30%) before the intervention and 89.5% (IQR: 71.5 to 94.5%) after the intervention (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

An intervention comprising practical training and information presented in different forms improved the handling of OADs at home by parents. There is an urgent need to implement this method in all oncology centers in Sweden, educate HCPs to standardize the presentation of information. There is also a great need to provide parents with age-appropriate oral drug formulations from the local hospital pharmacies in Sweden.

Reinventing the wheel: The incidence and cost implication of duplication of effort in patient education materials development

OBJECTIVE

The development of patient education (PE) materials is costly and resource-intensive, and no mechanisms exist for sharing materials across cancer centers/hospitals to limit duplicated effort. The aim of this study was to explore the incidence and cost implication of duplicated PE efforts.

METHODS

PE leaders from all (14) cancer centers in Ontario, Canada, submitted their collections of systemic therapy PE materials. Materials were categorized by topic and were coded as duplicate (more than one other material exists on the same topic and there was significant content and/or textual overlap), adapted (material was adapted from an existing material) or unique (no other material addresses the topic).

RESULTS

304 materials were included and <50 % of materials had duplicate content (n = 166, 55 %), a small proportion were adapted (n = 27, 9%), and less than half were unique (n = 111, 37 %). The majority of materials were considered amenable to adaptation meaning that the content was not dependent on a specific institutional context (n = 283, 93 %). The opportunity for cost savings if duplication of effort could be avoided is approximately $800 K for systemic therapy materials produced in cancer centers.

CONCLUSION

There is need to refine the process for developing PE materials. Creating mechanisms of sharing can help facilitate equal access to materials and can result in significant cost savings.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Efforts are needed to better coordinate the development of PE materials among patient educators. Better coordination would allow patient education programs to focus on other important challenges.

The Effect of Educational Follow-Up with the Motivational Interview Technique on Self-Efficacy and Drug Adherence in Cancer Patients Using Oral Chemotherapy Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine the effect of educational follow-up with the motivational interview technique on drug adherence and self-efficacy in patients with cancer using at least one oral chemotherapy drug.

DATA SOURCES

A total of 80 patients with cancer were randomly allocated to the intervention group or the control group. Educational follow-up with the motivational interview technique was applied to the patients with phone calls during weeks 1, 3, 6, and 9. Patients in the intervention and control groups were evaluated during both the first interview and at week 12 using a questionnaire, the medication adherence self-efficacy scale (MASES), and oral chemotherapy adherence scale (OCAS).

CONCLUSION

At the end of the study, the level of drug adherence and self-efficacy of patients who received educational follow-up with the motivational interview technique by phone call increased significantly (P < .001). Additionally, the level of drug self-efficacy of patients increased (P < .001).

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

This study emphasizes treatment compliance problems of patients with cancer using oral chemotherapy. Designed with communication techniques that will be added to our counseling process, interventions can allow nurses to use their time effectively.

Response to "Oral Chemotherapy: A Home Safety Educational Framework for Healthcare Providers, Patients, and Caregivers"

I would like to express my appreciation to Cynthia Huff, MSN, RN, OCN®, CRNI, CNL, for her article on home safety education for oral chemotherapy in the February 2020 issue of the Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing. I found it to be very comprehensive and informative, but I would like to address one point.