Cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure induced by left bundle branch block after transcatheter closure of ventricular septal defect

Predictors and long-term outcomes of heart block after transcatheter device closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defect

Background

Heart block is the most common and concerning complication associated with transcatheter device closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defect (pmVSD) and its occurrence remains a great challenge for device closure.

Methods

Between June 2002 and June 2020, 1076 pediatric patients with pmVSD, who successfully underwent transcatheter device closure in our center, were enrolled in this cohort study, with a median follow-up of 64 months (range: 1 to 19 years).

Results

Of 1076 patients, 234 (21.8%) developed postprocedural heart block, with right bundle branch block being the most common (74.8%), followed by left bundle branch block (16.2%), and atrioventricular block (5.6%). Complete atrioventricular block occurred in 5 cases, including 3 cases with permanent pacemaker implantation, 1 case with recovery to normal sinus rhythm, and 1 case with sudden cardiac death. Most patients (97.9%) developed heart block within 1 week of procedure. Finally, 138 cases returned to normal cardiac conduction. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that thin-waist occluders (odds ratio [OR]: 1.759; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.023 to 3.022; P = 0.041), and oversized devices (OR: 1.809; 95% CI: 1.322 to 2.476; P < 0.001) were independently associated with occurrence of postprocedural heart block. Moreover, heart block was less likely to occur when the left disk of occluder was placed within the aneurysmal tissue (OR: 0.568; 95% CI: 0.348 to 0.928; P = 0.024).

Conclusion

The outcome of postprocedural heart block is favorable in most cases. Oversized devices and thin-waist occluders should be avoided. Placement of the left disk of the device should into the aneurysmal tissue is highly recommended.

The Efficacy and Medium to Long-Term Follow-Up of Transcatheter Retrograde Closure of Perimembranous Ventricular Septal Defects via the Femoral Artery With Amplatzer Duct Occluder II in Children

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of transcatheter retrograde closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defect (pmVSD) via the femoral artery with an Amplatzer Duct Occluder II (ADO II) in children. Methods: The clinical and follow-up data of 102 children who had successfully undergone transcatheter retrograde closure of pmVSD via the femoral artery with Amplatzer Duct Occluder II (ADO II) from February 2012 to June 2019 in our center were retrospectively reviewed. Results: In 102 of 103 patients, the defects were successfully closed (99.0%). The average age was 4.03 ± 1.84 years and the mean weight was 17.50 ± 5.58 kg. The mean diameter of the defects was 2.58 ± 0.63 mm. Hundred of the occluders had a waist length of 4 mm. The complete closure rate was 89.2% 24 h after the procedure and 98% at the last follow-up. The follow-up period ranged from 6 to 92 months, with a median of 36 months. One child developed new mild aortic regurgitation (AR), and 9 patients developed new mild tricuspid regurgitation (TR). During follow-up, TR disappeared in 5 patients and decreased in 4 patients, and AR relieved in one patient. One patient developed intermittent complete left bundle branch block 4 days after the procedure and recovered sinus rhythm 2 days later. No serious complications occurred. Conclusion: Transcatheter retrograde closure of pmVSD via the femoral artery with ADO II in children is safe, feasible, and effective in selected patients.

[Changes in electrocardiographic parameters in children with complete left bundle branch block early after transcatheter closure of ventricular septal defect]

OBJECTIVE

To observe the changes in electrocardiographic parameters in children with complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB) after the transcatheter closure of simple ventricular septal defect (VSD).

METHODS

A total of 21 children with CLBBB early after transcatheter closure of perimembranous VSD were recruited. Another 21 children without any type of arrhythmia after transcatheter closure of perimembranous VSD were enrolled as the control group. The sex, age, and the size of occluder were matched between the two groups. The changes in the following indices were compared between the two groups: left ventricular voltage, QT interval, corrected QT interval (QTc), QT dispersion (QTd), corrected QT dispersion (QTcd), JT dispersion (JTd), and corrected JT dispersion (JTcd) on the electrocardiogram before transcatheter closure and at 1, 3, 5, 30 days after transcatheter closure.

RESULTS

Left ventricular voltage and JTcd changed with operation time in the CLBBB and control groups (P<0.05). There were interaction effects between time and grouping in the changes in left ventricular voltage and QTd (P<0.05). There was a significant difference in JTcd between the CLBBB and control groups (P<0.05). There was also a significant difference in left ventricular voltage between the CLBBB and control groups at 3 and 5 days after the transcatheter closure (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

There are significant differences in electrocardiographic left ventricular voltage and JTcd between VSD children with and without CLBBB early after transcatheter closure. JTcd might be useful in predicting the development of CLBBB early after transcatheter closure of VSD.