Cross-reactivity and pathogenicity of anti-DNA autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus

SLE: a cognitive step forward-a synthesis of rethinking theories, causality, and ignored DNA structures

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is classified by instinctual classification criteria. A valid proclamation is that these formally accepted SLE classification criteria legitimate the syndrome as being difficult to explain and therefore enigmatic. SLE involves scientific problems linked to etiological factors and criteria. Our insufficient understanding of the clinical condition uniformly denoted SLE depends on the still open question of whether SLE is, according to classification criteria, a well-defined one disease entity or represents a variety of overlapping indistinct syndromes. Without rational hypotheses, these problems harm clear definition(s) of the syndrome. Why SLE is not anchored in logic, consequent, downstream interdependent and interactive inflammatory networks may rely on ignored predictive causality principles. Authoritative classification criteria do not reflect consequent causality criteria and do not unify characterization principles such as diagnostic criteria. We need now to reconcile legendary scientific achievements to concretize the delimitation of what SLE really is. Not all classified SLE syndromes are "genuine SLE"; many are theoretically "SLE-like non-SLE" syndromes. In this study, progressive theories imply imperative challenges to reconsider the fundamental impact of "the causality principle". This may offer us logic classification and diagnostic criteria aimed at identifying concise SLE syndromes as research objects. Can a systems science approach solve this problem?

Precise Targeting of Autoantigen-Specific B Cells in Lupus Nephritis with Chimeric Autoantibody Receptor T Cells

Despite conventional therapy, lupus nephritis (LN) remains a significant contributor to short- and long-term morbidity and mortality. B cell abnormalities and the production of autoantibodies against nuclear complexes like anti-dsDNA are recognised as key players in the pathogenesis of LN. To address the challenges of chronic immunosuppression associated with current therapies, we have engineered T cells to express chimeric autoantibody receptors (DNA-CAART) for the precise targeting of B cells expressing anti-dsDNA autoantibodies. T cells from LN patients were transduced using six different CAAR vectors based on their antigen specificity, including alpha-actinin, histone-1, heparan sulphate, or C1q. The cytotoxicity, cytokine production, and cell-cell contact of DNA-CAART were thoroughly investigated in co-culture experiments with B cells isolated from patients, both with and without anti-dsDNA positivity. The therapeutic effects were further evaluated using an in vitro immune kidney LN organoid. Among the six proposed DNA-CAART, DNA4 and DNA6 demonstrated superior selectively cytotoxic activity against anti-dsDNA+ B cells. Notably, DNA4-CAART exhibited improvements in organoid morphology, apoptosis, and the inflammatory process in the presence of IFNα-stimulated anti-dsDNA+ B cells. Based on these findings, DNA4-CAART emerge as promising candidates for modulating autoimmunity and represent a novel approach for the treatment of LN.

The greatest contribution to medical science is the transformation from studying symptoms to studying their causes-the unrelenting legacy of Robert Koch and Louis Pasteur-and a causality perspective to approach a definition of SLE

The basic initiative related to this study is derived from the fact that systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a unique and fertile system science subject. We are, however, still far from understanding its nature. It may be fair to indicate that we are spending more time and resources on studying the complexity of classified SLE than studying the validity of classification criteria. This study represents a theoretical analysis of current instinctual SLE classification criteria based on "the causality principle." The discussion has its basis on the radical scientific traditions introduced by Robert Koch and Louis Pasteur. They announced significant changes in our thinking of disease etiology through the implementation of the modern version of "the causality principle." They influenced all aspects of today's medical concepts and research: the transformation of medical science from studies of symptoms to study their causes, relevant for monosymptomatic diseases as for syndromes. Their studies focused on bacteria as causes of infectious diseases and on how the immune system adapts to control and prevent contagious spreading. This is the most significant paradigm shift in the modern history of medicine and resulted in radical changes in our view of the immune system. They described acquired post-infection immunity and active immunization by antigen-specific vaccines. The paradigm "transformation" has a great theoretical impact also on current studies of autoimmune diseases like SLE: symptoms and their cause(s). In this study, the evolution of SLE classification and diagnostic criteria is discussed from "the causality principle" perspective, and if contemporary SLE classification criteria are as useful as believed today for SLE research. This skepticism is based on the fact that classification criteria are not selected based on cogent causal strategies. The SLE classification criteria do not harmonize with Koch's and Pasteur's causality principle paradigms and not with Witebsky's Koch-derived postulates for autoimmune and infectious diseases. It is not established whether the classification criteria can separate SLE as a "one disease entity" from "SLE-like non-SLE disorders"-the latter in terms of SLE imitations. This is discussed here in terms of weight, rank, and impact of the classification criteria: Do they all originate from "one basic causal etiology"? Probably not.

Autoimmunity and SLE: Factual and Semantic Evidence-Based Critical Analyses of Definitions, Etiology, and Pathogenesis

One cannot discuss anti-dsDNA antibodies and lupus nephritis without discussing the nature of Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). SLE is insistently described as a prototype autoimmune syndrome, with anti-dsDNA antibodies as a central biomarker and a pathogenic factor. The two entities, "SLE" and "The Anti-dsDNA Antibody," have been linked in previous and contemporary studies although serious criticism to this mutual linkage have been raised: Anti-dsDNA antibodies were first described in bacterial infections and not in SLE; later in SLE, viral and parasitic infections and in malignancies. An increasing number of studies on classification criteria for SLE have been published in the aftermath of the canonical 1982 American College of Rheumatology SLE classification sets of criteria. Considering these studies, it is surprising to observe a nearby complete absence of fundamental critical/theoretical discussions aimed to explain how and why the classification criteria are linked in context of etiology, pathogenicity, or biology. This study is an attempt to prioritize critical comments on the contemporary definition and classification of SLE and of anti-dsDNA antibodies in context of lupus nephritis. Epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, and measures of therapy efficacy are implemented as problems in the present discussion. In order to understand whether or not disparate clinical SLE phenotypes are useful to determine its basic biological processes accounting for the syndrome is problematic. A central problem is discussed on whether the clinical role of anti-dsDNA antibodies from principal reasons can be accepted as a biomarker for SLE without clarifying what we define as an anti-dsDNA antibody, and in which biologic contexts the antibodies appear. In sum, this study is an attempt to bring to the forum critical comments on the contemporary definition and classification of SLE, lupus nephritis and anti-dsDNA antibodies. Four concise hypotheses are suggested for future science at the end of this analytical study.

The dsDNA, Anti-dsDNA Antibody, and Lupus Nephritis: What We Agree on, What Must Be Done, and What the Best Strategy Forward Could Be

This study aims to understand what lupus nephritis is, its origin, clinical context, and its pathogenesis. Truly, we encounter many conceptual and immanent tribulations in our attempts to search for the pathogenesis of this disease—and how to explain its assumed link to SLE. Central in the present landscape stay a short history of the early studies that substantiated the structures of isolated or chromatin-assembled mammalian dsDNA, and its assumed, highly controversial role in induction of anti-dsDNA antibodies. Arguments discussed here may provoke the view that anti-dsDNA antibodies are not what we think they are, as they may be antibodies operational in quite different biological contexts, although they bind dsDNA by chance. This may not mean that these antibodies are not pathogenic but they do not inform how they are so. This theoretical study centers the content around the origin and impact of extra-cellular DNA, and if dsDNA has an effect on the adaptive immune system. The pathogenic potential of chromatin-anti-dsDNA antibody interactions is limited to incite lupus nephritis and dermatitis which may be linked in a common pathogenic process. These are major criteria in SLE classification systems but are not shared with other defined manifestations in SLE, which may mean that they are their own disease entities, and not integrated in SLE. Today, the models thought to explain lupus nephritis are divergent and inconsistent. We miss a comprehensive perspective to try the different models against each other. To do this, we need to take all elements of the syndrome SLE into account. This can only be achieved by concentrating on the interactions between autoimmunity, immunopathology, deviant cell death and necrotic chromatin in context of elements of system science. System science provides a framework where data generated by experts can be compared, and tested against each other. This approach open for consensus on central elements making up “lupus nephritis” to separate what we agree on and how to understand the basis for conflicting models. This has not been done yet in a systematic context.

Future Perspectives on Pathogenesis of Lupus Nephritis: Facts, Problems, and Potential Causal Therapy Modalities

Divergent incommensurable models have been developed to explain the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis. Most contemporary models favor a central role for anti-chromatin antibodies. How they exert their pathogenic effect has, however, endorsed conflicts that at least for now preclude insight into definitive pathogenic pathways. The following paradigms are contemporarily in conflict with each other: i) the impact of anti-double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) antibodies that cross-react with inherent renal antigens, ii) the impact of anti-dsDNA antibodies targeting exposed chromatin in glomeruli, and iii) the impact of relative antibody avidity for dsDNA, chromatin fragments, or cross-reacting antigens. Aside from these three themes, the pathogenic role of T cells in lupus nephritis is not clear. These different models should be tested through a collaboration between scientists belonging to the different paradigms. If it turns out that there are different pathogenic pathways in lupus nephritis, the emerging pathogenic mechanism(s) may be encountered with new individual causal therapy modalities. Today, therapy is still unspecific and far from interfering with the cause(s) of the disorder. This review attempts to describe what we know about processes that may cause lupus nephritis and how such basic processes may be affected if we can specifically interrupt them. Secondary inflammatory mechanisms, cytokine signatures, activation of complement, and other contributors to inflammation will not be discussed herein; rather, the events that trigger these factors will be discussed.

The pathogenesis and diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus: still not resolved

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease with various clinical manifestations affecting different tissues. A characteristic feature of SLE is the presence of autoantibodies against double-stranded (ds)DNA, histones and nucleosomes, and other chromatin components. SLE is a prototype type III hypersensitivity reaction. Local deposition of anti-nuclear antibodies in complex with released chromatin induces serious inflammatory conditions by activation of the complement system. The severe renal manifestation, lupus nephritis, is classified based on histological findings in renal biopsies. Apoptotic debris, including chromatin, is present in the extracellular matrix and circulation of patients with SLE. This may be due to an aberrant process of apoptosis and/or insufficient clearance of apoptotic cells/chromatin. The non-cleared apoptotic debris may lead to activation of both the innate and adaptive immune systems. In addition, an aberrant presentation of peptides by antigen-presenting cells, disturbed selection processes for lymphocytes, and deregulated lymphocyte responses may be involved in the development of autoimmunity. In the present review, we briefly will summarize current knowledge on the pathogenesis of SLE. We will also critically discuss and challenge central issues that need to be addressed in order to fully understand the pathogenic mechanisms involved in the development of SLE and in order to have an improved diagnosis for SLE. Disappointingly, in our opinion, there are still more questions than answers for the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of SLE.

Clinical phenotype associations with various types of anti-dsDNA antibodies in patients with recent onset of rheumatic symptoms. Results from a multicentre observational study

Despite anti-dsDNA antibodies constitute a wide range of specificities, they are considered as the hallmark for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Monoclonal auto-antibodies and sera of autoimmune patients react with Plasmodium falciparum and inhibit its in vitro growth

The relationship between autoimmunity and malaria is not well understood. To determine whether autoimmune responses have a protective role during malaria, we studied the pattern of reactivity to plasmodial antigens of sera from 93 patients with 14 different autoimmune diseases (AID) who were not previously exposed to malaria. Sera from patients with 13 different AID reacted against Plasmodium falciparum by indirect fluorescent antibody test with frequencies varying from 33-100%. In addition, sera from 37 AID patients were tested for reactivity against Plasmodium yoelii 17XNL and the asexual blood stage forms of three different P. falciparum strains. In general, the frequency of reactive sera was higher against young trophozoites than schizonts (p < 0.05 for 2 strains), indicating that the antigenic determinants targeted by the tested AID sera might be more highly expressed by the former stage. The ability of monoclonal auto-antibodies (auto-Ab) to inhibit P. falciparum growth in vitro was also tested. Thirteen of the 18 monoclonal auto-Ab tested (72%), but none of the control monoclonal antibodies, inhibited parasite growth, in some cases by greater than 40%. We conclude that autoimmune responses mediated by auto-Ab may present anti-plasmodial activity.

Elevated levels of serum antibodies against alpha-1, 6-glucan in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus or rheumatoid arthritis

This study was undertaken to investigate whether levels of anti-alpha-1, 6-glucan antibodies in human sera correlate with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Serum samples were collected from patients with SLE (n = 30), RA (n = 30) and healthy adult volunteers. IgG, IgA and IgM levels against alpha-1, 6-glucan were measured using enzyme linked immunosorbent assays. Anti-alpha-1, 6-glucan IgG prevalence was raised in patients with active SLE (73.3%) and RA (60%) compared with healthy controls (13.3%). Strong correlation between anti-alpha-1,6-glucan-IgG levels and anti-perinuclear factor (r = 0.642; p < 0.05) in RA patients or anti-nuclear antibodies (r = 0.675; p < 0.05) in SLE patients was observed. No significant differences in anti-alpha-1,6-glucan-IgA or-IgM levels were noted between different groups. We conclude that anti-alpha-1,6-glucan-IgG levels were significantly elevated in patients with SLE or RA and positively correlated with disease activity.

Chromatin as a target antigen in human and murine lupus nephritis

The present review focuses on pathogenic molecular and transcriptional events in patients with lupus nephritis. These factors are renal DNaseI, exposed chromatin fragments and the corresponding chromatin-reactive autoantibodies. Lupus nephritis is the most serious complication in human systemic lupus erythematosus, and is characterised by deposition of chromatin fragment-IgG complexes in the mesangial matrix and glomerular basement membranes. The latter deposition defines end-stage disease. This event is stringently linked to a renal-restricted shutdown of expression of the DNaseI gene, as determined by loss of DNaseI mRNA level and DNaseI enzyme activity. The major aim of the present review is to generate new therapeutic strategies based on new insight into the disease pathogenesis.

Alpha-actinin: a multidisciplinary protein with important role in B-cell driven autoimmunity

Alpha-actinin (α-actinin) is a ubiquitous cytoskeletal protein, which belongs to the superfamily of filamentous actin (F-actin) crosslinking proteins. It is present in multiple subcellular regions of both muscle and non-muscle cells, including cell-cell and cell-matrix contact sites, cellular protrusions and stress fiber dense regions and thus, it seems to bear multiple important roles in the cell by linking the cytoskeleton to many different transmembrane proteins in a variety of junctions. Four isoforms of human α-actinin have already been identified namely, the "muscles" α-actinin-2 and α-actinin-3 and the "non-muscles" α-actinin-1 and α-actinin-4. The precise functions of α-actinin isoforms as well as the precise role and significance of their binding to F-actin particularly in-vivo, have been elusive. They are generally believed to represent key structural components of large-scale F-actin cohesion in cells required for cell shape and motility. α-Actinin-2 has been implicated in myopathies such as nemalin body myopathy, hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathy and it may have at least an indirect pathogenetic role in diseases of the central nervous system (CNS) like schizophrenia, epilepsy, ischemic brain damage, CNS lupus and neurodegenerative disorders. The role of "non-muscle" α-actinins in the kidney seems to be crucial as an essential component of the glomerular filtration barrier. Therefore, they have been implicated in the pathogenesis of familial focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, nephrotic syndrome, IgA nephropathy, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and minimal change disease. α-Actinin is also expressed on the membrane and cytosol of parenchymal and ductal cells of the liver and it seems that it interacts with hepatitis C virus in an essential way for the replication of the virus. Finally α-actinin, especially α-actinin-4, has been implicated in cancer cell progression and metastasis, as well as the migration of several cell types participating in the immune response. Based on these functions, the accumulating reported evidence of the importance of α-actinin as a target autoantigen in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases, particularly systemic lupus erythematosus and autoimmune hepatitis, is also discussed along with the possible perspectives that are potentially emerging from the study of this peculiar molecule in health and disease.

Specific cross-reaction of anti-dsDNA antibody with platelet integrin GPIIIa49-66

Anti-platelet autoantibodies are frequently found in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients and contribute to the development of SLE-associated immunologic thrombocytopenia (SLE-ITP). Although the correlation of anti-dsDNA autoantibody with platelet-associated antibody has been reported, the potential mechanism underlying such a correlation is incompletely understood. We have reported that anti-platelet integrin GPIIIa49-66 (CAPESIEFPVSEARVLED) autoantibodies play a major role in the development of HIV-1-related thrombocytopenia (HIV-1-ITP). The strong negative charge of GPIIIa49-66 prompts us to investigate whether GPIIIa49-66 can be an epitope mimicking dsDNA. We report here that anti-GPIIIa49-66 antibodies are found in three out of nine SLE-ITP patients. Double-stranded (ds) DNA competitively inhibited the binding of purified patient anti-dsDNA antibodies to GPIIIa49-66 peptide. Both polyclonal and monoclonal anti-GPIIIa49-66 antibodies are able to cross-react with dsDNA. Consistent with previous reports, the DNA binding activities of anti-GPIIIa49-66 antibodies are mainly dependent on the positively charged amino acid in the heavy-chain complementarity-determining region 3 (HCDR3). The HCDR3 of human SLE anti-dsDNA monoclonal antibody (mAb) 412.67 demonstrates a similar positively charged amino acid chain orientation compared with that of anti-GPIIIa49-66 mAb A11, and it cross-reacts with GPIIIa49-66 peptide. Purified anti-GPIIIa49-66 antibodies from SLE-ITP patients are able to induce platelet fragmentation in vitro and to induce thrombocytopenia in vivo. Thus, our data suggest that specific epitope cross-reaction between GPIIIa49-66 and dsDNA could be a mechanism involved in the development of SLE-associated thrombocytopenia.

Lupus nephritis: the central role of nucleosomes revealed

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune syndrome characterized by autoantibodies to nuclear constituents. Some of these antibodies are diagnostically important, whereas others act as disease-modifying factors. One clinically important factor is autoantibodies against dsDNA and nucleosomes, which have overlapping diagnostic and nephritogenic impact in SLE. Although a scientific focus for 5 decades, the molecular and cellular origin of these antibodies, and why they are associated with lupus nephritis, is still not fully understood. A consensus has, however, evolved that antibodies to dsDNA and nucleosomes are central pathogenic factors in the development of lupus nephritis. In contrast, no agreement has been reached as to which glomerular structures are bound by nephritogenic anti-nucleosome antibodies in vivo. Mutually contradictory paradigms and models have evolved simply because we still lack precise and conclusive data to provide definitive insight into how autoantibodies induce lupus nephritis and which specificity is critical in the nephritic process(es). In this review, data demonstrating the central role of nucleosomes in inducing and binding potentially nephritogenic antibodies to DNA and nucleosomes are presented and discussed. These autoimmune-inducing processes are discussed in the context of Matzinger's danger model (Matzinger P: Friendly and dangerous signals: is the tissue in control? Nat Immunol 2007, 8:11-13; Matzinger P: The danger model: a renewed sense of self. Science 2002, 296:301-305; Matzinger P: Tolerance, danger, and the extended family. Annu Rev Immunol 1994, 12:991-1045) and Medzhitov's and Janeway's (Medzhitov R, Janeway CA Jr: Decoding the patterns of self and nonself by the innate immune system. Science 2002, 296:298-300; Medzhitov R, Janeway CA Jr: How does the immune system distinguish self from nonself? Semin Immunol 2000, 12:185-188; Janeway CA Jr, Medzhitov R: Innate immune recognition. Annu Rev Immunol 2002, 20:197-216) distinction of noninfectious self (NIS) and infectious nonself (INS). The mechanisms leading to production of potentially nephritogenic anti-nucleosome antibodies and to overt lupus nephritis are interpreted in the context of these paradigms.

A Central Role of Nucleosomes in Lupus Nephritis

Lupus nephritis is characterized by the presence of subendothelial and subepithelial immune complexes and thickening of the glomerular basement membranes (GBM). Electron-dense structures (EDS) in mesangium and GBM have been demonstrated to constitute target structures for nephritogenic autoantibodies in vivo. Whether these antibodies bind nucleosomal antigens within the EDS or cross-react with components of the GBM has not been resolved. Data recently published point at intra-GBM-associated nucleosomes as target for the nephritogenic autoantibodies. Colocalization IEM has demonstrated that autoantibodies and experimental antibodies against DNA, histones, or transcription factors like TATA box-binding protein colocalize in the EDS. By using terminal transferase in situ nick-end labeling in combination with immune electron microscopy to detect DNA specifically in human and murine SLE kidneys, we were able to detect DNA within the EDS of nephritic glomeruli that corresponded with the detected autoantibodies.

Nucleosomes possess a high affinity for glomerular laminin and collagen IV and bind nephritogenic antibodies in murine lupus-like nephritis

AIM

Lupus nephritis is closely associated with in vivo autoantibody-binding to glomerular membrane-associated electron-dense structures (EDS). The biochemical nature and cellular origin of EDS are controversial, and definitive characterisation needs to be performed.

METHODS

By using the terminal transferase biotin-dUTP nick end-labelling (TUNEL) assay at the electron microscopic level, we have traced extracellular chromatin within the glomerular basement membranes of nephritic (NZBxNZW)F1 mice. The TUNEL assay was subsequently used in combination with standard immune electron microscopy (IEM). To analyse why chromatin particles associate with membranes, we determined the affinity of nucleosomes and DNA for glomerular laminin, collagen IV and the mesangial matrix proteoglycan perlecan by surface plasmon resonance.

RESULTS

This intra-assay colocalisation TUNEL IEM demonstrated that autoantibodies fully colocalised with extracellular TUNEL-positive chromatin observed as EDS in glomerular membranes, similar to results obtained by the same technique applied to human lupus nephritis. Most importantly, these data validate the murine variant of lupus nephritis as a model to study origin of extracellular chromatin as a key element in human lupus nephritis. Kinetic analyses demonstrated that nucleosomes had a high affinity for collagen IV and laminin, but not for perlecan.

CONCLUSION

Collectively, these results provide firm evidence that dominant target structures for nephritogenic autoantibodies are constituted by TUNEL-positive chromatin associated with glomerular capillary and mesangial matrix membranes at high affinity.

Serum antiguanosine antibodies as a marker for SLE disease activity and pathogen potential

BACKGROUND

This article reviews research conducted on the immunogenicity of the nucleosides of DNA, especially guanosine, the most immunologically active nucleoside. Discussed is the relationship between circulating antibodies to guanosine, their potential role in SLE disease activity, the binding properties of monoclonal antiguanosine antibody (4H2) compared to polyclonal antiguanosine antibodies in humans with SLE, cell membrane penetration by these antibodies and their interference with signal transduction possibly related to their binding to mitochondria and their apparent GTPase activity.

METHODS

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay methodology was used to show clinical relationships between antiguanosine antibody levels and disease activity in SLE. These results are discussed along with methods of detecting cell penetration by this antibody using special staining techniques, laser-scanning microscope detection of mitochondrial localization, and interference of cAMP and pKA production/activation. Additionally, there is some discussion regarding the assay used to detect enzymatic activity of antiguanosine antibodies.

RESULTS

Enhanced circulating levels of antiguanosine antibodies in patients with SLE correlate closely with SLE disease activity. Other factors are discussed that support the pathogenic potential of these antibodies, including their ability to penetrate lymphocytes, bind to mitochondria, inactivate mitochondrial function, interfere with signal transduction, and their potential enzymatically activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Antiguanosine antibodies correlate with SLE disease activity and may be pathogenically important in SLE by interfering with signal transduction, inactivating mitochondrial and cell function in patients with SLE.