The NIH pulse cyclophosphamide regime: the end of an era?

Pregnancy, lupus and antiphospholipid syndrome (Hughes syndrome)

Autoimmune diseases (AD) occur frequently in women during their childbearing years and may influence pregnancy outcome and neonatal health. Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) can experience a disease flare-up during pregnancy with potential negative effects on the product of conceptus, especially if the disease is active. Recurrent pregnancy loss is now considered as a treatable clinical condition associated with the presence of circulating antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). The neonatal lupus syndromes (NLS), caused by the transplacental passage of maternal IgG anti-Ro/SS-A and anti-La/SS-B antibodies to the fetus, carry significant morbidity and mortality in case of cardiac manifestations. Immunosuppressive agents are often administered during pregnancy in order to control maternal disease and to ensure a better pregnancy outcome. Nowadays, owing to our increasing knowledge of the disease pathophysiological mechanisms and the development of combined medical-obstetric clinics, pregnancy outcome in patients with AD has notably improved.

CD4+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells prolong drug-induced disease remission in (NZBxNZW) F1 lupus mice

Introduction

The ability to ameliorate murine lupus renders regulatory T cells (Treg) a promising tool for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). In consideration to the clinical translation of a Treg-based immunotherapy of SLE, we explored the potential of CD4+Foxp3+ Treg to maintain disease remission after induction of remission with an established cyclophosphamide (CTX) regimen in lupus-prone (NZBxNZW) F1 mice. As a prerequisite for this combined therapy, we also investigated the impact of CTX on the biology of endogenous Treg and conventional CD4+ T cells (Tcon).

Methods

Remission of disease was induced in diseased (NZBxNZW) F1 mice with an established CTX regimen consisting of a single dose of glucocorticosteroids followed by five day course with daily injections of CTX. Five days after the last CTX injection, differing amounts of purified CD4+Foxp3+CD25+ Treg were adoptively transferred and clinical parameters, autoantibody titers, the survival and changes in peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets were determined at different time points during the study. The influence of CTX on the numbers, frequencies and proliferation of endogenous Treg and Tcon was analyzed in lymphoid organs by flow cytometry.

Results

Apart from abrogating the proliferation of Tcon, we found that treatment with CTX induced also a significant inhibition of Treg proliferation and a decline in Treg numbers in lymphoid organs. Additional adoptive transfer of 1.5 × 10⁶ purified Treg after the CTX regimen significantly increased the survival and prolonged the interval of remission by approximately five weeks compared to mice that received only the CTX regimen. The additional clinical amelioration was associated with an increase in the Treg frequency in the peripheral blood indicating a compensation of CTX-induced Treg deficiency by the Treg transfer.

Conclusions

Treg were capable to prolong the interval of remission induced by conventional cytostatic drugs. This study provides valuable information and a first proof-of-concept for the feasibility of a Treg-based immunotherapy in the maintenance of disease remission in SLE.

Efficacy and safety of multitarget therapy with mizoribine and tacrolimus for systemic lupus erythematosus with or without active nephritis

The prognosis of lupus nephritis (LN) has improved since the introduction of immunosuppressant therapies, but the safety and effectiveness of treatments can also be improved. We retrospectively assessed the treatment courses of 12 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus who were treated with glucocorticoid, mizoribine (MZR) and tacrolimus. This regimen was used as initial therapy for active LN in six patients (mean glucocorticoid dose, 66.6 mg); four of these six patients also received pulse methylprednisolone therapy. The starting doses of MZR and tacrolimus were 150 and 3 mg, respectively, and they were titrated as required. Five of six patients achieved complete remission and one achieved partial remission at 6 months. Five patients who completed 12-month analysis achieved complete remission. Another six patients were given the combination regimen for treating minor flares or for steroid sparing. The mean prednisolone doses were reduced from 11.0 mg at baseline to 6.6 mg at 12 months. Six patients experienced minor adverse events, including three minor infections. One patient stopped tacrolimus because of suspected toxicity. All 12 patients were successfully treated, and none experienced severe adverse events. Multitarget therapy combining glucocorticoid, MZR and tacrolimus may have the potential to become a treatment option which is effective and safe.

Tacrolimus versus cyclophosphamide as treatment for diffuse proliferative or membranous lupus nephritis: a non-randomized prospective cohort study

Treatment of lupus nephritis (LN) with cyclophosphamide (CYC) is effective but retains a certain severe adverse effect. Tacrolimus (TAC) may be a suitable treatment for LN. Forty patients with diffuse proliferative or membranous LN were recruited for this non-randomized open-label study — 67.5% (27/40) had nephrotic proteinuria (>3.5 g/day) and 50.0% (20/40) had low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (<60 mL/min/1.73m2). We compared the efficacy and adverse effects of TAC (0.04–0.08 mg/kg/d)/prednisone for 12 months (TAC group, n = 20) with intravenous CYC (750 mg/m2 per month)/prednisone for six months followed by azathioprine (Aza) (100 mg/day)/prednisone for six months (CYC group, n = 20). The TAC target concentration was 6–8 ng/mL or 4–6 ng/mL, respectively, when induction or maintenance therapy was required and 4.0 ng/mL for patient with renal insufficiency. In the TAC group, mean urinary protein excretion decreased significantly from 5.00 ± 1.91 g/day at baseline to 2.54 ± 1.68 g/day after two weeks of therapy ( P < 0.001), compared with the CYC group (4.9 ± 19.4 g/day), P = 0.001, and 65.0% (13/20) achieved partial remission at one month, compared with the CYC group (0/20), P < 0.001. The incidence of complete remission (CR) was significantly higher in the TAC group than in the CYC group (55.0% vs.15.0% by five months, P = 0.008, and 75.0% vs.40.0% by 12 months, P = 0.025, respectively). The significant improvement in serum anti-dsDNA and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity index (DAI) was in the TAC group relative to the CYC group at 12 months ( P = 0.031, P = 0.003, respectively). The eGFR improved in the TAC group from 59.90 ± 23.64 mL/min/1.73m2 at baseline to 93.75 ± 28.52 mL/min/1.73m2 after 12 months, P = 0.001. In the CYC group, two patients developed end-stage renal disease (ESRD), three patients experienced serious pneumonia, and one patient died. Our preliminary study showed TAC is a safe and effective treatment for LN with severe renal disease, and with less-severe adverse events compared with CYC followed Aza therapy. Further larger sample studies are needed to confirm our conclusion.

Mycophenolate mofetil or tacrolimus compared with intravenous cyclophosphamide in the induction treatment for active lupus nephritis

BACKGROUND

Although the use of aggressive immunosuppression has improved both patient and renal survival of patients with lupus nephritis (LN), the optimal treatment of LN remains challenging. The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and tacrolimus compared with intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVC) as induction therapies for active lupus nephritis (ALN).

METHODS

In this open-label, 24-week prospective study, 60 patients with biopsy-proven ALN (Classes III, IV, V or combination) were randomly assigned to receive MMF, tacrolimus or IVC in combination with corticosteroids. The remission of proteinuria, systemic lupus erythematosus disease active index and adverse events were compared.

RESULTS

The response rates at 24 weeks were 70% (14/20) in the MMF group, 75% (15/20) in the tacrolimus group and 60% (12/20) in the IVC group (P>0.05). The complete remission rates were also similar in the three groups (40, 45 and 30%, respectively; P>0.05). There were more cases of infection in the IVC group (8/20) and the MMF group (8/20) than the tacrolimus group (3/20) and more hyperglycemia in the tacrolimus group (5/20) than the other two groups (2 or 3/20), but the results were not statistically significant among the three groups. Proteinuria decreased and serum albumin increased more quickly in the patients treated with tacrolimus (P=0.0051 and P=0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study suggests that both MMF and tacrolimus are possible alternatives to IVC as induction therapies for ALN in Chinese patients. Tacrolimus possibly results in a faster resolution of proteinuria and hypoalbuminemia. Further studies are necessary to determine the optimal dosage and duration of the therapies.

Alternative therapies: what role do they have in the management of lupus?

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease with higher morbidity and mortality among ethnic Chinese patients than Whites. Corticosteroid and other immunosuppressive drugs, including cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, and hydroxychloroquine are traditional therapies for this disease. Since the year 2000, mycophenolate mofetil and rituximab have been widely used in refractory SLE or severe lupus nephritis. Because the high disease activity remains, even after active therapy, and serious side effects from Western medicines may develop, more than 40% of SLE patients in Western countries are pursuing complementary and alternative therapies (CATs). CAT remedies are multiplex, and include herbal medicines, diets and vitamins, acupuncture, chiropractice, folk medicine, massage, spiritual healing, etc. Many herbal formulas have been used but in general their efficacy in treating lupus is doubted because of the lack of strong evidence. Tripterygium (T2) has demonstrated good efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and SLE, but widespread use is limited due to the side effects. Through randomized clinical trials, we hope in the future that some Chinese medicines may be found helpful as CATs for SLE.

Oral cyclophosphamide is on the verge of extinction as therapy for severe autoimmune diseases (especially lupus): should nephrologists care?

Some day we will have powerful targeted therapies for autoimmune diseases. Remission will be induced efficiently. Side effects will be mere ripples. Unfortunately, that day is not imminent. Current therapies are powerful but with unintended targets and side effects that can be equivalent to a sea change. For SLE, the current competition to select the 'gold standard' immunosuppressant has come down to two regimens: intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCY, standard NIH protocol or its variations) versus oral mycophenolate (MMF). Until recently, IVCY reigned as the gold standard, a title it achieved through a curious journey that did not involve rigorous head-to-head competition. Oral cyclophosphamide (POCY) has not been invited to the current competition to select the gold standard immunosuppressant despite the substantial evidence that POCY can perform at least as well as IVCY or mycophenolate, and compared to IVCY, is far less expensive, easier for the patient, and maybe more effective in African-Americans. Here, we state the case for POCY as therapy for severe autoimmune diseases. We suggest that if POCY is allowed to compete, it will not disappoint.

Beyond immunosuppression – challenges in the clinical management of lupus nephritis

Lupus nephritis remains the most common severe manifestation of SLE with increased risk of death and end-stage renal disease. Although, recent research has focused on the choice of immunosuppressive in its treatment, other factors, including the quality and delivery of healthcare, the management of glucocorticoids and co-morbidity are probably of more importance. There has been significant progress in induction regimes with the successful use of mycophenolate mofetil, low dose intravenous cyclophosphamide and development of sequential regimens whereby cyclophosphamide is followed by an alternative immunosuppressive. However, the attention on the day-to-day management of lupus nephritis in the clinic has merited less attention. In this article, we aim to address more widely the major issues which are encountered regularly in the long-term management of these patients. The overall goals are the reduction of mortality and preservation of renal function.

Successful treatment of class V+IV lupus nephritis with multitarget therapy

Treatment of class V+IV lupus nephritis remains unsatisfactory despite the progress made in the treatment of diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis. In this prospective study, 40 patients with class V+IV lupus nephritis were randomly assigned to induction therapy with mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and steroids (multitarget therapy) or intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCY). Patients were treated for 6 mo unless complete remission was not achieved, in which case treatment was extended to 9 mo. An intention-to-treat analysis revealed a higher rate of complete remission with multitarget therapy at both 6 and 9 mo (50 and 65%, respectively) than with IVCY (5 and 15%, respectively). At 6 mo, eight (40%) patients in each group experienced partial remission, and at 9 mo, six (30%) patients receiving multitarget therapy and eight (40%) patients receiving IVCY experienced partial remission. There were no deaths during this study. Most adverse events were less frequent in the multitarget therapy group. Calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity was not observed, but three patients developed new-onset hypertension with multitarget therapy. In conclusion, multitarget therapy is superior to IVCY for inducing complete remission of class V+IV lupus nephritis and is well tolerated.

Remission of Severe Relapsing or Persistent Lupus Nephritis Using Mycophenolate Mofetil

BACKGROUND

The therapy of severe lupus nephritis (LN) consists of high-dose steroids and immunosuppressive agents, usually cyclophosphamide. Although effective in up to 90% of cases, this approach leads to undesirable complications in many cases. In recent years, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), an immunosuppressive drug used in transplantation regimes, seems to be effective in selected cases of lupus nephritis.

METHODS

In this report we present the results using MMF in seven cases of LN. MMF stabilized renal function, controlled extrarenal disease activity and led to less steroid dosing.

RESULTS

Three patients achieved complete remission, two partial remissions and two failed, although these two patients were the ones with the highest chronicity indices in the renal biopsies. However, they were able to maintain stable renal function for more than one year with tolerable side effects. In two more patients the latter were mild and did not require either hospitalization or intense therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

MMF can be an option for selected cases with severe relapsing or persistent LN and can lead to induction of remission. This observation needs to be expanded. Larger randomized controlled studies are needed to evaluate its indication in earlier cases as induction of de novo disease and/or effective remission maintenance.

Association of leukocyte CR1 gene transcription with the disease severity and renal involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus

The reduced level of complement receptor 1 (CR1) on erythrocytes is speculated as a key mechanism contributing to immune complex (IC) overload and exaggerated complement (C) activation in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Comparatively, fewer studies documented lower levels of CR1 on leukocytes and glomerular podocytes in this disease. The decline in E-CR1 is largely believed as an acquired phenomenon caused due to the proteolytic cleavage of CR1 from erythrocyte membrane. The mechanism underlying reduced CR1 expression on nucleated cells is under constant investigation. Recently, reduced leukocytes CR1 gene transcription had been demonstrated in SLE and was suggested as the main cause of decline in leukocyte CR1 (L-CR1). The relationship of L-CR1 gene transcription with severity and pathophysiology of disease needs to be elucidated. We determined the levels of L-CR1 in 30 active SLE patients and compared with normal healthy controls (n = 30). Patients were categorized into two groups i.e., with nephritis (n = 14) or without nephritis (n = 16). The expression of L-CR1 at transcriptional level was correlated with the levels of serum CIC, C3 and anti dsDNA antibodies. The levels of L-CR1 transcription were significantly reduced in all SLE patients as compared to controls (P < 0.001). This decline in L-CR1 however, was more marked in patients with nephritis than those without nephritis. In addition, the serum levels of CIC, anti dsDNA antibodies were higher and the levels of serum C3 were lower than the normal range in the patients. The difference was much more marked in SLE patients with nephritis than those without nephritis. The levels of L-CR1 transcription correlated negatively with the levels of CIC and anti dsDNA antibodies and positively with serum C3 levels. Thus, between SLE patients with and without nephritis, we found significant difference in the levels of L-CR1 transcription (P < 0.01), CIC (P < 0.05), anti dsDNA antibodies (P < 0.01) and C3 (P < 0.01). Our findings suggest that L-CR1 is drastically reduced in patients with severe form of SLE, i.e., lupus nephritis. Determination of L-CR1 expression at transcriptional level in addition to disease hallmarks like C3, CIC and anti-dsDNA antibodies may facilitate the assessment of severity of SLE and discrimination between patients with or without renal involvement.