Open-label study of pirfenidone in patients with progressive forms of multiple sclerosis

Alzheimer's Disease: Exploring the Role of Inflammation and Implications for Treatment

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by both structural abnormalities and inflammation in the brain. While recent research has chiefly focused on the structural changes involved in AD, understanding the pathophysiology and associated inflammation of the AD brain helps to elucidate potential therapeutic and preventative options. By exploring the data supporting an inflammatory etiology of AD, we present a case for the use of existing evidence-based treatments addressing inflammation as promising options for treating and preventing AD. We present data demonstrating tumor necrosis factor alpha association with the inflammation of AD. We also discuss data supporting TNF alpha associated inflammation in traumatic brain injury, stroke, and spinal disc associated radiculopathy. We augment this previously unarticulated concept of a unifying pathophysiology of central nervous system disease, with reports of benefits of TNF alpha inhibition in many hundreds of patients with those diseases, including AD. We also assess the pathophysiologic and clinical trial evidence supporting the role of other inflammation resolving treatments in AD. In aggregate, the data from the several potentially effective therapeutic and preventative options contained within this report presents a clearer picture of next steps needed in research of treatment alternatives.

Pirfenidone Initiates a New Era in the Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic, progressive, and fatal disease that has long eluded therapy. Prognosis remains very poor, and currently lung transplantation offers the only hope of survival. Recently, great strides have been made in the development of pharmaceutical therapy to treat IPF. Pirfenidone, an oral antifibrotic agent, has been shown to slow progression of the disease and improve progression-free survival, offering new hope for patients suffering from IPF.

Evaluation of Study and Patient Characteristics of Clinical Studies in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review

Background

So far, clinical studies in primary progressive MS (PPMS) have failed to meet their primary efficacy endpoints. To some extent this might be attributable to the choice of assessments or to the selection of the study population.

Objective

The aim of this study was to identify outcome influencing factors by analyzing the design and methods of previous randomized studies in PPMS patients without restriction to intervention or comparator.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS and the COCHRANE Central Register of Controlled Trials (inception to February 2015). Keywords included PPMS, primary progressive multiple sclerosis and chronic progressive multiple sclerosis. Randomized, controlled trials of at least one year’s duration were selected if they included only patients with PPMS or if they reported sufficient PPMS subgroup data. No restrictions with respect to intervention or comparator were applied. Study quality was assessed by a biometrics expert. Relevant baseline characteristics and outcomes were extracted and compared.

Results

Of 52 PPMS studies identified, four were selected. Inclusion criteria were notably different among studies with respect to both the definition of PPMS and the requirements for the presence of disability progression at enrolment. Differences between the study populations included the baseline lesion load, pretreatment status and disease duration. The rate of disease progression may also be an important factor, as all but one of the studies included a large proportion of patients with a low progression rate. In addition, the endpoints specified could not detect progression adequately.

Conclusion

Optimal PPMS study methods involve appropriate patient selection, especially regarding the PPMS phenotype and progression rate. Functional composite endpoints might be more sensitive than single endpoints in capturing progression.

Single- and Multiple-Dose Pharmacokinetics of Pirfenidone, an Antifibrotic Agent, in Healthy Chinese Volunteers

A randomized, dose-escalating study evaluated the pharmacokinetics of single and multiple oral doses of pirfenidone, a promising antifibrotic agent, in 48 healthy Chinese volunteers. The effects of sex and food on the pharmacokinetics of pirfenidone were also evaluated. Pharmacokinetics was determined from serial blood samples obtained up to 12 hours after administration of single 200-, 400-, or 600-mg doses of pirfenidone and after multiple doses of 400 mg administrated 3 times daily (tid). Plasma levels of pirfenidone and areas under the curve were found to be proportional to dose. Pirfenidone was rapidly absorbed (t(max) = 0.33-1 hours) and cleared (t((1/2)) = 2-2.5 hours). Pharmacokinetic parameters after multiple doses were similar to those after single doses. Food had a significant effect (P < .01) on the extent of absorption (AUC(0-infinity) = 37.4 +/- 15.4 mg x h/L [fed] vs 46.6 +/- 16.8 mg x h/L [fasted]), rate of absorption was considerably (P < .001) prolonged (t(max) = 1.5 +/- 0.4 hours [fed] vs 0.7 +/- 0.2 hours [fasted]), and peak concentrations were significantly (P < .001) decreased (C(max) = 9.2 +/- 2.9 mg/L [fed] vs 13.0 +/- 1.8 mg/L [fasted]). No significant sex differences were noted for pharmacokinetic variables. Pirfenidone was well tolerated. These results support a tid regimen of pirfenidone for the management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Concomitant intake of food will reduce the rate and extent (about 20%) of absorption, which is associated with better tolerability of pirfenidone.

Pirfenidone for diabetic nephropathy

Pirfenidone is an oral antifibrotic agent that benefits diabetic nephropathy in animal models, but whether it is effective for human diabetic nephropathy is unknown. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 77 subjects with diabetic nephropathy who had elevated albuminuria and reduced estimated GFR (eGFR) (20 to 75 ml/min per 1.73 m²). The prespecified primary outcome was a change in eGFR after 1 year of therapy. We randomly assigned 26 subjects to placebo, 26 to pirfenidone at 1200 mg/d, and 25 to pirfenidone at 2400 mg/d. Among the 52 subjects who completed the study, the mean eGFR increased in the pirfenidone 1200-mg/d group (+3.3 ± 8.5 ml/min per 1.73 m²) whereas the mean eGFR decreased in the placebo group (-2.2 ± 4.8 ml/min per 1.73 m²; P = 0.026 versus pirfenidone at 1200 mg/d). The dropout rate was high (11 of 25) in the pirfenidone 2400-mg/d group, and the change in eGFR was not significantly different from placebo (-1.9 ± 6.7 ml/min per 1.73 m²). Of the 77 subjects, 4 initiated hemodialysis in the placebo group, 1 in the pirfenidone 2400-mg/d group, and none in the pirfenidone 1200-mg/d group during the study (P = 0.25). Baseline levels of plasma biomarkers of inflammation and fibrosis significantly correlated with baseline eGFR but did not predict response to therapy. In conclusion, these results suggest that pirfenidone is a promising agent for individuals with overt diabetic nephropathy.

Pirfenidone: an anti-fibrotic therapy for progressive kidney disease

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Many chronic diseases of various etiologies lead to fibrosis and organ dysfunction. Despite many advances in medicine in recent years, options to slow the progression of fibrotic diseases have remained limited. The recent availability of pirfenidone, an antifibrotic and anti-inflammatory investigational agent, thus offers a new hope for treating progressive fibrotic diseases.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

This review provides concise review of the available data regarding the mechanism and pharmacokinetics of pirfenidone and preclinical and clinical data regarding efficacy and safety in fibrotic diseases of the kidney. It also reviews results of clinical trials involving pirfenidone in other fibrotic diseases.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

The review will provide in-depth review of pirfenidone with a renal focus.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Because many of the available clinical trials have been small and/or uncontrolled, conclusive evidence regarding efficacy and safety of pirfenidone is lacking, particularly in patients with renal or hepatic dysfunction. Larger studies are needed to better understand long-term efficacy and safety of this medication in various patient populations.

Effects of three anti-TNF-alpha drugs: etanercept, infliximab and pirfenidone on release of TNF-alpha in medium and TNF-alpha associated with the cell in vitro

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) is a vital component of the inflammatory process and its aberrant over-expression has been linked to numerous disease states. New treatment strategies have sought to reduce circulating TNF-alpha, either with neutralizing anti-TNF-alpha binding proteins such as etanercept or via drugs that inhibit de novo TNF-alpha synthesis like pirfenidone. In the present study, we examined the effects of both classes of drugs on secreted and cell-associated TNF-alpha produced by THP-1 cells. All of the tested drugs significantly reduced secreted levels of bioactive TNF-alpha following stimulation with LPS as measured by bioassay. However, etanercept-treated cells had approximately six-fold higher levels of cell-associated TNF-alpha compared with that of the LPS-alone treatment group. Surprisingly, LPS+infliximab treated cells did not increase cell-associated TNF-alpha relative to the LPS-alone treatment. Pirfenidone significantly reduced both secreted and cell-associated TNF-alpha levels. These drug-related differences in cell-associated TNF-alpha may have broad implications in the future for the therapeutic uses of anti-TNF-alpha drugs in the management of TNF-alpha diseases.

Primary-progressive multiple sclerosis

About 10-15% of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) present with gradually increasing neurological disability, a disorder known as primary-progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS). Compared with relapse-onset multiple sclerosis, people with PPMS are older at onset and a higher proportion are men. Inflammatory white-matter lesions are less evident but diffuse axonal loss and microglial activation are seen in healthy-looking white matter, in addition to cortical demyelination, and quantitative MRI shows atrophy and intrinsic abnormalities in the grey matter and the white matter. Spinal cord atrophy corresponds to the usual clinical presentation of progressive spastic paraplegia. Although neuroaxonal degeneration seems to underlie PPMS, the pathogenesis and the extent to which immune-mediated mechanisms operate is unclear. MRI of the brain and spinal cord, and examination of the CSF, are important investigations for diagnosis; conventional immunomodulatory therapies, such as interferon beta and glatiramer acetate, are ineffective. Future research should focus on the clarification of the mechanisms of axonal loss, improvements to the design of clinical trials, and the development of effective neuroprotective treatments.

Pirfenidone slows renal function decline in patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Pirfenidone is an orally available antifibrotic agent that has shown benefit in animal models of pulmonary and renal fibrosis and in clinical trials of pulmonary fibrosis, multiple sclerosis, and hepatic cirrhosis. Our objective was to determine whether pirfenidone slows the loss of renal function in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

An open-label trial was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pirfenidone in patients with idiopathic and postadaptive focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. The monthly change in estimated GFR, expressed as ml/min per 1.73 m2, was compared between the baseline period and the treatment period. During both periods, patients received angiotensin antagonist therapy if tolerated. Twenty-one patients were enrolled, and 18 patients completed a median of 13 mo of pirfenidone treatment.

RESULTS

The monthly change in GFR improved from a median of -0.61 ml/min per 1.73 m2 (interquartile range -1.31 to -0.41) during the baseline period to -0.45 ml/min per 1.73 m2 (interquartile range -0.78 to -0.16) with pirfenidone therapy. This change represents a median of 25% improvement in the rate of decline (P < 0.01). Pirfenidone had no effect on BP or proteinuria. Adverse events attributed to therapy included dyspepsia, sedation, and photosensitive dermatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

It is concluded that pirfenidone is an attractive candidate for placebo-controlled trials in patients with progressive chronic kidney disease.

Novel oral agents for multiple sclerosis

In 1993, interferon beta-1b, the first clinically proven disease-modifying agent for multiple sclerosis, was approved, with several comparable agents following close behind. These agents have been beneficial in reducing relapse events and MRI lesions, but all require parenteral administration, leading some otherwise eligible patients to decline such therapies. Oral agents have been studied for decades with mixed results, but a small number of medications currently being tested in phase II/III clinical trials have shown promise in efficacy and tolerability. This review assesses the results of the more thoroughly studied of these agents, some of which may soon be approved for use in multiple sclerosis.

A new hypothesis about the origin of uterine fibroids based on gene expression profiling with microarrays

This article will discuss some recent insights based on our microarray studies that have emphasized the role the extracellular matrix, transforming growth factor beta, and collagen structure in fibroid formation. These studies led to appreciation of molecular similarities between fibroids and keloids. Collectively, these observations suggest a model of fibroid development based on an abnormal response to tissue repair, resulting in disordered healing and formation of an altered extracellular matrix.

Primary progressive multiple sclerosis : current and future treatment options

Approximately 10% of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) run a primary progressive course characterised by an accumulation of neurological deficits without relapse or remission. Designing therapeutic trials in primary progressive MS (PPMS) has presented several problems. Patient recruitment may be difficult because of the relative rarity of PPMS and historically has been hindered by the lack of specific diagnostic criteria. There has been a limited choice of validated outcome measures, although, in recent studies, the MS functional composite measure and magnetic resonance imaging measures of lesion load and atrophy have been widely used. Despite these problems, several trials have been designed specifically for PPMS, including exploratory randomised controlled trials of interferon-beta-1a and interferon-beta-1b and mitoxantrone, a phase III trial of glatiramer acetate, and an open-label study of riluzole. Patients with PPMS have also been included in randomised controlled trials of azathioprine, methotrexate, cladribine, intravenous immunoglobulin and cyclophosphamide, and open-label studies of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation and pirfenidone in progressive MS. However, no treatment has been proven definitively to modify the course of the disease. Looking to the future, therapeutic agents should aim to target the underlying pathogenic mechanisms in PPMS. As a result of the relative lack of inflammation in PPMS, neuroprotective agents that target neuronal loss directly, rather than inflammation, may be more worthwhile. However, further investigation into the pathogenic mechanisms in PPMS is required to guide the development of future therapeutic agents.

Pirfenidone inhibits lung allograft fibrosis through L-arginine-arginase pathway

Transplant-related lung fibrosis is characterized by excessive fibro-collagenous deposition. Induction of arginase, an enzyme that metabolizes L-arginine to urea and L-ornithine, is vital for collagen synthesis. Pirfenidone is an investigational anti-fibrotic agent shown to be effective in blocking pulmonary fibrosis. The purpose of this study was to determine if pirfenidone was protective against the development of fibro-collagenous injury in rat lung orthotopic transplants through altering L-arginine-arginase metabolic pathways. Lung transplants were performed using Lewis donors and Sprague-Dawley recipients (allografts) or the same strain (isografts). Recipients were given pirfenidone (0.5% chow) 1-21-day post-transplantation. A significantly increased peak airway pressure (PawP) with excessive collagen deposition was found in untreated lung allografts. Pirfenidone treatment decreased PawP and collagen content in lung allografts. The beneficial effects were associated with downregulation of arginase protein expression and activity. In addition, pirfenidone decreased endogenous transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta level in lung allografts, and TGF-beta stimulated arginase activity in a dose-dependent manner in both lung tissue and fibroblasts. These results suggest that pirfenidone inhibits local arginase activity possibly through suppression of endogenous TGF-beta, hence, limiting the development of fibrosis in lung allografts.

A double-blind, randomized, controlled study of oral pirfenidone for treatment of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

Currently, there are no approved treatments for secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) that stabilize or reverse the neurological disabilities associated with this disease. Oral pirfenidone was found to stabilize and overcome the disabilities in two published independent open-label studies in secondary progressive MS. This led us to study pirfenidone in a phase II double-blind, randomized and controlled, clinical trial in patients with advanced secondary progressive MS for 12 months. Forty-three patients met the eligibility criteria approved by the IRB and accepted by the FDA. Of these patients, 18 were randomly assigned to placebo and 25 patients to oral pirfenidone groups. All eligible patients were included in the statistical analysis of the data according to intention-to-treat principles. Some patients on oral pirfenidone manifested mild drug-related adverse effects, but it was well tolerated overall. By one month, pirfenidone significantly (P < 0.05) improved the Scripps Neurological Rating Scale (SNRS) scores, and scores remained significantly improved for 3, 6 and 12 months when compared to the baseline SNRS scores. In contrast, the SNRS scores of patients on oral placebo were not significantly improved at 1, 3, 6 or 12 months of the study, when compared with baseline scores. Oral pirfenidone significantly (P <0.04) reduced the incidence of relapses (27.8% on placebo versus 8.0% on pirfenidone). Furthermore, oral pirfenidone treatment was associated with a marked improvement in bladder dysfunction (40.0% on pirfenidone versus 16.7% on placebo). Expanded Disability Status Scale scores and MRI lesion count were not significantly different in the placebo and pirfenidone groups. These findings indicate a significant effect of pirfenidone on clinical disability and bladder function for secondary progressive MS patients. A major multicentre, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial is justified.

Lebensqualit�t bei Multipler Sklerose

Measuring quality of life (QOL) has made essential contributions for the management of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). QOL measures may be used for helping to assess the complex changes which patients with MS have to go through during the disease trajectory, and they may be used for pharmacoeconomic research. The large number of tests available includes generic ones such as Short Form SF-36 and Sickness Impact Profile, health-related ones such as MSQOL-54, FAMS, or HAQUAMS, and patient generated measures such as the Patient Generated Index and SEIQOL-DW. Depression, cognitive impairment, and fatigue are important factors influencing QOL. Since the different tests measure quite different facets of QOL, this review intends to help the reader select a tool suited to the aim and specific question. It is hoped that QOL measures may help to better understand patients, to become a more helpful medical partner, to assist patients to develop perspectives for their future, and to decide about therapies or even palliative interventions.