Every-other-day interferon beta-1b versus once-weekly interferon beta-1a for multiple sclerosis (INCOMIN Trial) II: analysis of MRI responses to treatment and correlation with Nab

Regulatory Dendritic Cells Induced by K313 Display Anti-Inflammatory Properties and Ameliorate Experimental Autoimmune Encephalitis in Mice

As a GSK-3β inhibitor reported by our group, K313 is a novel benzoxazole derivative and displays anti-inflammatory properties in RAW264.7 macrophages without cytotoxicity. The activity of GSK-3β affects the differentiation and maturation of bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (DCs). This study aims to investigate whether K313 can be used to induce regulatory/tolerogenic dendritic cells (DCregs), and the therapeutic effects of DCregs induced by K313 in the autoimmune model of experimental autoimmune encephalitis (EAE). The results show that compared with LPS stimulated mature DCs, K313-treated bone marrow-derived DCs display obvious tolerogenic characteristics with decreased expression of co-stimulatory molecules, downregulated secretions of pro-inflammatory cytokines and unregulated secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10. The above characteristics conform to the typical phenotypes of DCregs. Moreover, K313-modified DCregs inhibit antigen-specific T cell responses in vitro. Furthermore, by adoptive transfer, K313 modified DCregs to the EAE mice, and the development of disease was ameliorated to some extent. In addition, treatment with K313-modified DCregs also significantly reduced the percentages of splenetic Th1 and Th17 cells and increased the percentage of regulatory T cells in EAE mice. In conclusion, K313-modified DCregs show anti-inflammatory properties in vitro and have a significant positive effect on the EAE disease in vivo. Our data indicate that K313-induced DCregs pulsed with auto-antigen might have potential use as a therapeutic approach for autoimmune inflammation of the central nervous system.

Tolerability, treatment satisfaction and quality of life outcomes in stable multiple sclerosis patients switched from injectable therapies to auto injected intramuscular interferon beta 1a: The SFERA study

BACKGROUND

Interferon beta (IFNB) and Glatiramer acetate, long-term first line disease modifying treatments (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS), have different injection frequencies crucial for injection site related side effects. We aimed at investigating whether switching to intramuscular IFNB-1a injected once/week with the Avonex®Pen™ device improves treatment tolerability and quality of life in stable MS patients.

METHODS

Clinically stable MS patients, whom their treating neurologist switched from high frequency injectable DMTs to weekly intramuscular IFNB-1a because of bothersome injection site reactions, were included. Injection site and systemic tolerability were measured by a composite 100 mm visual analogue scale at screening, months 4 and 12. Treatment satisfaction, quality of life, relapses and EDSS progression were also recorded. The primary endpoint was change in injection site tolerability from screening to Month 4. Descriptive statistics and Wilcoxon paired signed-rank tests were applied.

RESULTS

The median injection site tolerability and systemic tolerability were significantly improved at months 4 (n = 36) and 12 (n = 33) [change -51.60 (IQR: -60.13, -39.60) mm (p < 0.0001); -26.00 (-54.00, 2.25) mm (p = 0.002)]. Median treatment satisfaction was significantly improved at month 12 [change of 18.00 (2.00, 47.50) mm (p = 0.0003)]. Physical and mental components of the SF-36 did not change significantly, and 30/33 (90.9%) and 33/33 (100%) patients were free from relapses and EDSS progression at month 12.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly intramuscular IFNB-1a may represent an alternative treatment option for clinically stable MS patients suffering from intolerable injection-related side effects under treatment with high frequency injectable DMTs.

Recent developments in interferon-based therapies for multiple sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic and disabling immune-mediated disease of the central nervous system. Beta-interferons are the first approved and still the most widely used first-line disease-modifying treatment in MS.

AREAS COVERED

Here we focus on recent developments in pharmacology and delivery systems of beta-interferons, and discuss their place within current state of the art therapeutic approaches. We briefly review the clinical trials for classical and PEGylated formulations, emphasizing effectiveness, safety concerns, and tolerability. The mechanisms of action of IFN-β in view of MS pathogenesis are also debated

EXPERT OPINION

Though only modestly efficient in reducing the annualized relapse rate, beta-interferons remain a valid first-line option due to their good long-term safety profile and cost-efficacy. Moreover, they are endogenous class II cytokines essential for mounting an effective antiviral response, and they may interact with putative MS triggering factors such as Epstein-Barr virus infection and human endogenous retroviruses. Recent improvements in formulations, delivery devices and drug regimens tackle the tolerability and adherence issues frequently seen with these drugs, and scientific advances may offer means for a better selection of patients. Although a well-established immunomodulatory treatment, beta-interferons have not said their last word in the management of MS.

Managing the side effects of multiple sclerosis therapy: pharmacotherapy options for patients

INTRODUCTION

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated and neurodegenerative disease with an unpredictable outcome. Immune-modulatory treatment aims at decreasing long-term disability. With the increasing number of treatment options, it is essential to fully digest the possible side effects of the available therapeutics and to monitor patients is essential.

AREAS COVERED

All approved disease-modifying drugs (DMD) for MS are discussed in this review. Mode of action, adverse effects, reported risks for infections and malignancies, and pregnancy related issues are discussed in the review. The authors also provide suggestions for monitoring therapy. For all approved DMDs the pivotal studies have been included for possible side effects, as well as reports by health authorities. For this manuscript, PubMed was checked for reports on side effects for various drugs.

EXPERT OPINION

Treatment options in MS are manifold, each carrying different risks. The safety-risk profile for approved agents is favorable. Knowing and monitoring these possible side effects is essential to minimize risks associated with treatment. Presently, the long-term experience for some of these therapies is missing and this must be addressed.

Optimization and stratification of multiple sclerosis treatment in fast developing economic countries: a perspective from Qatar

OBJECTIVE

The introduction of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) - with varying degrees of efficacy for reducing annual relapse rate and disability progression - has considerably transformed the therapeutic landscape of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). We aim to develop rational evidence-based treatment recommendations and algorithms for the management of clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) and RRMS that conform to the healthcare system in a fast-developing economic country such as Qatar.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic review using a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, PubMed, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (1 January 1990 through 30 September 2016). Additional searches of the American Academy of Neurology and European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis abstracts from 2012 through 2016 were performed, in addition to searches of the Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency websites to obtain relevant safety information on these DMTs.

RESULTS

For each of the DMTs, the mode of action, efficacy, safety and tolerability are briefly discussed. To facilitate the interpretation, the efficacy data of the pivotal phase III trials are expressed by their most clinically useful measure of therapeutic efficacy, the number needed to treat (NNT). In addition, an overview of head-to-head trials in RRMS is provided as well as a summary of the several different RRMS management strategies (lateral switching, escalation, induction, maintenance and combination therapy) and the potential role of each DMT. Finally, algorithms were developed for CIS, active and highly active or rapidly evolving RRMS and subsequent breakthrough disease or suboptimal treatment response while on DMTs. The benefit-to-risk profiles of the DMTs, taking into account patient preference, allowed the provision of rational and safe patient-tailored treatment algorithms.

CONCLUSIONS

Recommendations and algorithms for the management of CIS and RRMS have been developed relevant to the healthcare system of this fast-developing economic country.

Update on disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune, demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS). It predominantly affects young women and is one of the most common causes of disability in young adults. MS is characterized by formation of white matter lesions in the CNS as a result of inflammation, demyelination, and axonal loss. Treatment has been a focus of neurological research for over 60 years. A number of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have become available making MS a treatable disease. These compounds target the inflammatory response in MS. They work by decreasing the chances of relapse, decreasing the chances of new lesion formation seen on MRI of the CNS and slowing the accumulation of disability. The first drugs for MS to be available were interferon-β and glatiramer acetate. These work by modulating the inflammatory response via different mechanisms that are briefly discussed. Newer agents have since become available and have significantly changed the dynamics of MS treatment. These include fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate and teriflunomide, which are oral agents. Other second-line and third-line Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved medications include natalizumab and alemtuzumab. Natalizumab is considered one of the most potent treatments for relapse prevention. However, the high risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), which is caused by JC virus infection in the brain, tempers the more widespread use of this agent; nevertheless, JC virus antibody tests have helped to stratify the risk of PML. Alemtuzumab, which also has a considerable side effect profile, is likewise highly efficacious. Ocrelizumab, a monoclonal antibody to CD20 on B cells, is a highly effective agent for MS that is likely to be approved soon by the FDA. MS is a major contributor to healthcare costs and it is critical that healthcare providers be aware of the availability and benefits of DMTs. It is imperative that prompt and adequate treatment be established on diagnosis. Changes in therapy should be considered when there is evidence of disease activity as well as accumulation of disability or safety or tolerability concerns.

Development of interferon beta-neutralising antibodies in multiple sclerosis--a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Interferon beta (IFN-β) is the drug of choice for treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis and is known to reduce the frequency and severity of relapses. This systematic review determines the occurrence of neutralising antibodies (NAbs) against different formulations of IFN-β: IFN-β-1a Avonex™, IFN-β-1a Rebif™ and IFN-β-1b Betaferon/Betaseron™.

METHODS

The databases used in the review included MEDLINE Ovid (from 1950 to March 2015), Embase Ovid (from 1980 to March 2015), CENTRAL on The Cochrane Library (2011, Issue 4) and ClinicalTrials.gov (from 1997 to March 2015). All studies that compared the efficacy of the different formulations of IFN-β in patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis including IFN-β-1a Avonex™, IFN-β-1a Rebif™, IFN-β-1b Betaferon/Betaseron™ and IFN-β-1b Extavia™ were included.

RESULTS

Assessment of randomised controlled trials demonstrated that Avonex™ was 76% less likely than Rebif™ to lead to the formation of NAbs. Avonex™ was 88% less likely than Betaferon/Betaseron™ to lead to the formation of NAbs. Similar findings were also observed in the non-randomised controlled studies, with Avonex™ having the lowest risk. The formation of NAbs was dose dependent: Avonex™ at 30 μg was 64% less risky than Avonex™ at 60 μg.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that 2.0-18.9% of patients developed NAbs to Avonex™, 16.5-35.4% of patients developed NAbs to Rebif™ and 27.3-53.3% of patients developed NAbs to Betaferon/Betaseron™.

Acceptance of the extracare program by Beta interferon-treated patients with multiple sclerosis: results of the explore study

BACKGROUND

To gain full benefit from disease-modifying therapies such as interferon β-1b, patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) need to adhere to treatment in the long term. Treatment adherence requires high patient satisfaction with treatment and care.

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to evaluate the satisfaction of patients with MS receiving interferon β-1b Extavia with the patient care program Extracare. Efficacy and safety of treatment were evaluated as secondary objectives.

METHODS

In this prospective, noninterventional 1-year study, data on the satisfaction of 174 patients with MS with Extracare were obtained by questionnaires. Disability and symptom severity as well as patients' reported activity limitations, quality of life, and fatigue were recorded.

RESULTS

We observed high levels of patients' satisfaction with MS nurses, telephonic care, and information provided by Extracare (values ≤ 1.53 on a Likert scale ranging from 1 [very good] to 6 [insufficient]). Patient reported quality of life (Patient Reported Indices for MS QoL) improved from 11.82 ± 11.36 at baseline to 9.74 ± 10.94 at the end of the study (p = .02), whereas clinical parameters of disease progression remained unchanged. Rate of adverse events was as expected.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides the basis for further improvements of care programs to increase treatment adherence of patients with MS.

Requirement for safety monitoring for approved multiple sclerosis therapies: an overview

During the last two decades, treatment options for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) have broadened tremendously. All agents that are currently approved for clinical use have potential side effects, and a careful risk-benefit evaluation is part of a decision algorithm to identify the optimal treatment choice for an individual patient. Whereas glatiramer acetate and interferon beta preparations have been used in MS for decades and have a proven safety record, more recently approved drugs appear to be more effective, but potential risks might be more severe. The potential complications of some novel therapies might not even have been identified to their full extent. This review is aimed at the clinical neurologist in that it offers insights into potential adverse events of each of the approved MS therapeutics: interferon beta, glatiramer acetate, mitoxantrone, natalizumab, fingolimod and teriflunomide, as well as recently approved therapeutics such as dimethyl fumarate and alemtuzumab. It also provides recommendations for monitoring the different drugs during therapy in order to avoid common side effects.

Interferon-β1bin multiple sclerosis

In 1993, interferon (IFN)-beta(1b) for subcutaneous injection became the first US FDA-approved immunomodulatory treatment for multiple sclerosis, a chronic inflammatory disease of the CNS. In this review of IFN-beta(1b), we first present a short introduction to multiple sclerosis and currently available therapeutics. We then summarize current knowledge about the biochemical structure of IFN-beta(1b), as well as pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, including data on putative mechanisms underlying therapeutic as well as adverse effects. Furthermore, a critical review of ongoing and recently published clinical trials investigating IFN-beta(1b) in multiple sclerosis will be provided. Main topics are: trials investigating IFN-beta(1b) after a first clinical event, at higher dosages or in comparison to once-weekly subcutaneous IFN-beta(1a) injections, 16 years of long-term follow-up, IFN-beta(1b) in Japanese patients, the role of neutralizing antibodies, biomarkers for the prediction of therapy response, IFN-beta(1b) and pregnancy, and IFN-beta(1b) treatment of children with multiple sclerosis. Finally, we discuss how novel drugs, especially monoclonal antibodies and orally administered immunosuppressants, might soon challenge the position of this well-established agent on the multiple sclerosis therapeutics market.

Modulation of inflammasome-mediated pulmonary immune activation by type I IFNs protects bone marrow homeostasis during systemic responses to Pneumocystis lung infection

Although acquired bone marrow failure (BMF) is considered a T cell-mediated autoimmune disease, possible innate immune defects as a cause for systemic immune deviations in response to otherwise innocuous infections have not been extensively explored. In this regard, we recently demonstrated an important role of type I IFNs in protecting hematopoiesis during systemic stress responses to the opportunistic fungal pathogen Pneumocystis in lymphocyte-deficient mice. Mice deficient in both lymphocytes and type I IFN receptor (IFrag(-/-) mice) develop rapidly progressing BMF due to accelerated bone marrow (BM) cell apoptosis associated with innate immune deviations in the BM in response to Pneumocystis lung infection. However, the communication pathway between lung and BM eliciting the induction of BMF in response to this strictly pulmonary infection has been unclear. In this study, we report that absence of an intact type I IFN system during Pneumocystis lung infection not only causes BMF in lymphocyte-deficient mice but also transient BM stress in lymphocyte-competent mice. This is associated with an exuberant systemic IFN-γ response. IFN-γ neutralization prevented Pneumocystis lung infection-induced BM depression in type I IFN receptor-deficient mice and prolonged neutrophil survival time in BM from IFrag(-/-) mice. IL-1β and upstream regulators of IFN-γ, IL-12, and IL-18 were also upregulated in lung and serum of IFrag(-/-) mice. In conjunction, there was exuberant inflammasome-mediated caspase-1 activation in pulmonary innate immune cells required for processing of IL-18 and IL-1β. Thus, absence of type I IFN signaling during Pneumocystis lung infection may result in deregulation of inflammasome-mediated pulmonary immune activation, causing systemic immune deviations triggering BMF in this model.

[Interferon-β1b in multiple sclerosis therapy: more than 20 years clinical experience]

The introduction of interferon-β1b in 1993 in the USA and 2 years later in Europe made it possible for the first time to alter the course of the disease in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). Subsequently, interferon-β1b was approved for the treatment of patients with active secondary progressive MS (1999) and early relapsing-remitting MS following a first demyelinating event (clinically isolated syndrome, CIS) (2006). Here we provide an overview of the clinical experience gathered during more than 20 years of interferon-β use focusing on long-term efficacy and safety and the impact of early initiation of treatment. Furthermore, the following aspects will be discussed: putative mechanisms of action of interferon-β, indications for a disease-modifying therapy, clinical relevance of neutralizing antibodies, importance of adherence in MS therapy, high versus low frequency therapy, combination therapies with interferon-β and safety of interferon-β in children and adolescents with MS and during pregnancy.

Neutralizing antibodies to interferon beta-1b multiple sclerosis: a clinico-radiographic paradox in the BEYOND trial

BACKGROUND

The frequency and impact of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) to interferon beta-1b (IFNβ-1b) on clinical and radiographic outcomes is controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To assess NAb impact in the BEYOND study.

METHODS

2244 patients were randomized (2:2:1) to receive IFNβ-1b, either 250 or 500 µg, or glatiramer acetate, 20 mg, and observed for 2-3.5 years. NAb titers were determined every 6 months. A titer ≥20 NU/ml was considered NAb positive. Efficacy was compared between NAb-positive and NAb-negative patients, using comprehensive statistical analyses, taking into account the delayed appearance of NAbs, the time-dependent changes in the relapse rate, spontaneous reversions to NAb-negative status, NAb-titer level, and also adjusting for baseline factors.

RESULTS

In the IFNβ-1b 250 µg group, NAb-positive titers were detected (≥ once) in 319 patients (37.0%); of these, 112 (35.1%) reverted to NAb-negative status. In the IFNβ-1b 500 µg group, 340 patients (40.7%) became NAb-positive and 119 (35.0%) reverted to NAb-negative status. In both IFNβ groups, especially the 250 µg arm, NAb-positive status was not associated with a convincing impact on any clinical outcome measure by any statistical analysis. By contrast, in both IFNβ groups, NAbs were associated with a very consistent deleterious impact on most MRI outcomes.

CONCLUSION

There was a notable dissociation between the impact of NAbs on MRI and clinical outcomes. On MRI measures, the impact was consistent and convincing, whereas on clinical measures a negative impact of NAbs was not found. The basis for this clinico-radiographic paradox is unknown but it suggests that the relationship between NAbs and the therapeutic effects of IFNβ-1b is complex.

Interferon β-1b directly modulates human neural stem/progenitor cell fate

Interferon beta (IFN-β) is a mainline treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS); however its exact mechanism of action is not completely understood. IFN-β is known as an immunomodulator; although recent evidence suggests that IFN-β may also act directly on neural stem/progenitor cells (NPCs) in the central nervous system (CNS). NPCs can differentiate into all neural lineage cells, which could contribute to the remyelination and repair of MS lesions. Understanding how IFN-β influences NPC physiology is critical to develop more specific therapies that can better assist this repair process. In this study, we investigated the effects of IFN β-1b (Betaseron®) on human NPCs in vitro (hNPCs). Our data demonstrate a dose-dependent response of hNPCs to IFN β-1b treatment via sustained proliferation and differentiation. Furthermore, we offer insight into the signaling pathways involved in these mechanisms. Overall, this study shows a direct effect of IFN β-1b on hNPCs and highlights the need to further understand how current MS treatments can modulate endogenous NPC populations within the CNS.

Neuroimaging in multiple sclerosis: neurotherapeutic implications

Imaging techniques, in particular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), play an important role in the diagnosis and management of multiple sclerosis (MS) and related demyelinating diseases. Findings on MRI studies of the brain and spinal cord are critical for MS diagnosis, are used to monitor treatment response and may aid in predicting disease progression in individual patients. In addition, results of imaging studies serve as essential biomarkers in clinical trials of putative MS therapies and have led to important insights into disease pathophysiology. Although they are useful tools and provide in vivo measures of disease-related activity, there are some important limitations of MRI findings in MS, including the non-specific nature of detectable white matter changes, the poor correlation with clinical disability, the limited sensitivity and ability of standard measures of gadolinium enhancing lesions and T2 lesions to predict future clinical course, and the lack of validated biomarkers of long term outcomes. Advancements that hold promise for the future include new techniques that are sensitive to diffuse changes, the increased use of higher field scanners, measures that capture disease related changes in gray matter, and the use of combined structural and functional imaging approaches to assess the complex and evolving disease process that occurs during the course of MS.

[Interferon β for multiple sclerosis. How much is good enough?]

Interferon β-1b (IFNB-1b, Betaferon®) was the first therapy for multiple sclerosis (MS) showing efficacy in a randomized controlled clinical trial. Early studies suggested a dose-dependency of the clinical efficacy of IFNB-1b. However, until recently no reliable clinical data were available to assess the potential of higher dosing to increase therapeutic efficacy. In addition, no clinical trials have been conducted to directly compare the efficacy of IFNB-1b with that of glatiramer acetate, an alternative first line treatment option for relapsing-remitting MS. Just recently, the prospective, randomized, multicenter study BEYOND was published which addressed both issues. In this review the BEYOND trial is reviewed and placed in the context of advantages and disadvantages of currently available first line therapies for MS.

Identification of targets and new developments in the treatment of multiple sclerosis--focus on cladribine

Orally available disease-modifying drugs for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) represent an unmet need for this chronic and debilitating disease. Among 5 currently investigated drugs at phase 3 clinical stage, promising efficacy data for fingolimod and oral cladribine have recently been published. However, benefits need to be weighed against the risks to define the role of these compounds within current treatment regimens. In this review, data on the efficacy of a promising compound, oral cladribine, are discussed and balanced with known and anticipated risks in a postmarketing era, and finally gives an outlook on the potential place of this drug in treatment algorithms for MS in the future.

Disease modifying agents for multiple sclerosis

Objective:

To summarize major clinical trials which evaluate the efficacy and safety data of approved disease modifying agents for the treatment of various types of multiple sclerosis.

Data Sources:

A MEDLINE (1966 to August 2008) search of clinical trials using the terms multiple sclerosis, interferon, glatiramer, mitoxantrone and natalizumab was performed. A manual bibliographic search was also conducted. English-language articles identified from the searches were evaluated. New agents under investigation in phase 3 clinical trials were identified using www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Study Selection & Data Extraction:

Relevant information was identified and selected based on clinical relevance and evidence-based strength. Prescribing information leaflets were used to provide usual dosage, contraindications, precautions, monitoring parameters and other relevant drug-specific information.

Data Synthesis:

Interferon beta products are more efficacious for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Interferon beta 1-b also delayed the time to diagnosis of definite multiple sclerosis and reduced brain lesion burden in patients with clinical isolated syndrome. Glatiramer and natalizumab have both established efficacy in relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis; whereas mitoxantrone is more commonly used in patients with advanced disease. There are limited data the comparative efficacy among different disease modifying agents. New agents currently under investigation have showed promising results and may offer more treatment options in the future.

Conclusions:

MS is a complex and devastating disease with challenging treatment considerations and approaches. Interferon beta products continue to be the mainstay of therapy in many patients, however, other treatments are proving to be at least as effective in the management of various types of MS. Newer compounds are being developed and studied with much anticipation and promise for the clinical management of the disease.

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, inflammatory, and degenerative neurological illness with no cure. It has been suggested that Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBO(2)T) may slow or reverse the progress of the disease. This article summarizes the clinical evidence for the use of HBO(2)T in the treatment of MS. We conducted a literature review focused on the interaction of hyperbaric oxygenation and MS. In particular, we appraised the clinical data regarding treatment and performed a meta-analysis of the randomized evidence using the methodology of the Cochrane Collaboration. We found 12 randomized studies in the area, all of which were performed between 1983 and 1987. A meta-analysis of this evidence suggests there is no clinically significant benefit from the administration of HBO(2)T. The great majority of randomized trials investigated a course of 20 treatments at pressures between 1.75ATA and 2.5ATA daily for 60-120 min over 4 weeks against a placebo regimen. None have tested the efficacy of HBO(2)T against alternative current best practice. No plausible benefit of HBO(2)T on the clinical course of MS was identified in this review. It remains possible that HBO(2)T is effective in a subgroup of individuals not clearly identified in the trials to date, but any benefit is unlikely to be of great clinical significance. There is some case for further human trials in selected subgroups and for prolonged courses of HBO(2)T at modest pressures, but the case is not strong. At this time, the routine treatment of MS with HBO(2)T is not recommended.

Interferon-beta1b for the treatment of multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis is a debilitating autoimmune disorder that causes disability in young adults.

OBJECTIVE

To review the efficacy and safety of IFN-beta1b in the management of relapsing-remitting and secondary progressive multiple scleroses and clinical isolated syndrome.

METHODS

A MEDLINE (1966-May 2007) search of clinical trials using the terms 'multiple sclerosis' and 'interferon' was performed. Manual bibliographic search was conducted. English-language articles were evaluated.

RESULTS

IFN-beta1b is more efficacious than placebo and at least as efficacious as IFN-beta1a or glatiramer for the management of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. IFN-beta1b also delayed the time to diagnosis of definite multiple sclerosis and reduced brain lesion burden in patients with clinical isolated syndrome. More long-term, large scale clinical data are warranted to ascertain its relative efficacy compared to other treatments.

CONCLUSION

IFN-beta1b is an effective treatment for multiple sclerosis. Common side effects are lymphopenia, injection site reactions, asthenia, flu-like symptoms and headache.

Magnetic resonance imaging in clinical trials

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this article is to review the latest clinical trials in neurological diseases where magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess treatment outcome.

RECENT FINDINGS

The unique sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging for detecting disorders in the brain has made it an attractive noninvasive tool for assessing treatment efficacy in several diseases. Volumetric and functional magnetic resonance imaging have proved to represent robust biomarkers for the evaluation of anti-Alzheimer treatments, and have demonstrated a significant impact of cholinesterase inhibitors. The optimization of thrombolytic therapy in acute ischemic stroke has concentrated on the quantification of the ischemic penumbra, using perfusion-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging. Standard assessment of T2 or fluid-attenuated inversion recovery lesion load remains the method of choice to evaluate new therapeutic strategy in multiple sclerosis. Other nonconventional quantitative magnetic resonance imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance volumetry, magnetization transfer imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, or magnetic resonance spectroscopy are increasingly used in the field.

SUMMARY

Magnetic resonance imaging has become a major surrogate marker of treatment response in clinical trials of neurological disorders, offering the possibility to reduce the required sample size or to shorten the duration of the trial.

A case study on the effect of neutralizing antibodies to interferon beta 1b in multiple sclerosis patients followed for 3 years with monthly imaging

Interferon beta (IFN-beta) is among the first-line treatment options for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). A potential caveat of therapy, however, is the development of neutralizing antibodies (NAb) and/or neutralizing activity (NA) non-antibody mediated, although debate is still ongoing as to whether NAb significantly hampers the efficacy of the drug or rather represents an immunologically irrelevant epiphenomenon. In the present study, we describe the effect of NAb on IFN-beta-1b through clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcome measures of five relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients who were treated with 250 mug of subcutaneously administered IFN-beta-1b every other day and developed NAb at varying titres and times during the course of therapy. Despite the small number of NAb(+) patients, heterogeneity in MRI/clinical response to IFN-beta-1b was identified. Response to IFN-beta-1b therapy was observed in the absence or presence of NAb. Also observed was failure to IFN-beta-1b coincident with high and sustained NAb titres, but also before NAb development or in the presence of low NAb titres. Multiple MRI and NAb measurements performed within the same individual allow for a better description of the complex heterogeneous response to IFN-beta-1b with respect to NAb occurrence.

Neutralizing antibodies to interferon beta-1b are not associated with disease worsening in multiple sclerosis

The clinical impact of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) on interferon beta (IFNbeta) efficacy was studied in three large patient cohorts comprising 6698 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients receiving IFNbeta-1b across North America, Europe, and Australia. In North America and Europe, NAb testing was generally undertaken because of a poor clinical response; in Australia, it was mandatory for every patient. Of the 6697 patients tested, 28.9% had at least one NAb titre > or = 20 neutralizing units (NU)/ml, 14.4% had NAb titres > or = 100 NU/ml and 7.7% had NAb titres > or = 400 NU/ml. The NAb-positive rate of 37.0% in Australia was significantly greater than those in North America (21.3%) and Europe (27.6%), and this was observed at every NAb titre level. Our results suggest that NAbs are not responsible for poor clinical responses and that NAb status is of little clinical value. These findings will need to be confirmed in a large independent study.