Prevention and management of false memory syndrome

DID in resurgence, not retreat

Contrary to the assertion of Paris, diverse indicators suggest that the diagnosis and treatment of dissociative identity disorder (DID) are resurgent rather than retreating. This commentary reviews the evidence that justifies the description of this condition as controversial, including research into dissociative amnesia. The potential harm that can result from a diagnosis of DID and risky treatment techniques, including hypnosis and abreaction, are described. It is suggested that this scientifically unproven and potentially harmful treatment model should be confronted and quelled and its diagnosis and treatment subjected to critical clinical review, including randomised controlled trials, as a matter of urgency. A plea is made for the Royal College of Psychiatrists to update its 1997 guidance document and for professional training to incorporate updated psychological and neurobiological research on human memory.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

None.

Psychogenic amnesia: when memory complaints are medically unexplained

The focus of this article is the assessment and management of medically unexplained (‘psychogenic’) amnesia, which we classify here as global or situation specific. Other psychiatric causes for memory disorder and neurological conditions that could cause diagnostic confusion are briefly reviewed, as are forensic aspects of memory complaints. Finally, brain and physiological mechanisms potentially associated with psychogenic amnesia are discussed.

The persistence of folly: a critical examination of dissociative identity disorder. Part I. The excesses of an improbable concept

OBJECTIVE

To examine the concept of dissociative identity disorder (DID).

METHOD

We reviewed the literature.

RESULTS

The literature shows that 1) there is no proof for the claim that DID results from childhood trauma; 2) the condition cannot be reliably diagnosed; 3) contrary to theory, DID cases in children are almost never reported; and 4) consistent evidence of blatant iatrogenesis appears in the practices of some of the disorder's proponents.

CONCLUSIONS

DID is best understood as a culture-bound and often iatrogenic condition.