1
|
Ndiaye C, Messiah A, Gokalsing E, Lislet N, Gillet C, Rene E, Atwan N, Jehel L, Spodenkiewicz M. Suicide attempts in Martinique and Reunion Island and appointments no-show. L'ENCEPHALE 2024:S0013-7006(24)00107-6. [PMID: 39510873 DOI: 10.1016/j.encep.2024.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 11/15/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Studies on suicidal behaviors in the French overseas territories remain rare. Although mental health resources are limited, some patients identified as being at risk of suicide do not attend the specialist consultations scheduled after identification or screening. Thus, the objective of our study was, firstly to provide a descriptive profile of patients followed up for a suicide attempt in Martinique and Reunion Island, and secondly to explore the risk factors associated with appointments no-show during follow-up. METHODS We conducted an ancillary retrospective cross-sectional study using data from the APSOM study. Data were collected on 255 patients aged at least 16, admitted to hospital emergency departments after a suicide attempt and followed up in ambulatory care, including 137 in Martinique and 118 in Reunion Island. The characteristics of the sample were described by means [min, max] and proportions [95% confidence intervals]. Differences according to the presence of appointments no-show or not were analyzed using comparison tests of means and percentages (Chi2, Fisher and Wilcoxon). Factors associated with appointments no-show were analyzed using a bootstrapped multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS The mean age of patients was 35 years [16-84 years]. Women were predominant with a sex ratio of 2.4:1 (71% women). Unemployment affected 37% [28%, 46%] of patients in Martinique and 49% [40%, 59%] in Reunion Island. Psychoactive substances consumption at the time of the suicidal act was observed in 36% [27%, 45%] of patients in Martinique and 34% [26%, 44%] in Reunion Island. The average number of suicide attempts was two per patient [1-20]. Finally, we found no significant association with appointments no-show except for center. Patients from Reunion Island were associated with better compliance than patients from Martinique (OR: 0.20 [0.05-0.65], P<0.012). CONCLUSION Our study provides a description of suicide attempts admitted to hospital and followed up in ambulatory care in two French overseas territories and suggests interesting approaches for adapting prevention strategies to the socioeconomic context and cultural realities of these territories, particularly outreach interventions for the most vulnerable patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Comsar Ndiaye
- Graduate School Public Health, université Paris-Saclay, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
| | - Antone Messiah
- Graduate School Public Health, université Paris-Saclay, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; Équipe MOODS, Inserm, centre de recherche en épidémiologie et santé des populations (CESP, UMR-1018), Villejuif, France
| | - Erick Gokalsing
- Équipe MOODS, Inserm, centre de recherche en épidémiologie et santé des populations (CESP, UMR-1018), Villejuif, France; Établissement public de santé mentale de La Réunion, 97866 Saint-Paul, Reunion; Laboratoire IRISSE (Ingénierie de la santé, du sport et de l'environnement), EA 4075, UFR SHE, université de La Réunion, 97430 Le Tampon, Reunion
| | - Nelly Lislet
- Équipe MOODS, Inserm, centre de recherche en épidémiologie et santé des populations (CESP, UMR-1018), Villejuif, France; Centre hospitalier universitaire de Martinique, hôpital Pierre Zobda-Quitman, 97261 Fort-de-France, Martinique
| | - Claire Gillet
- Établissement public de santé mentale de La Réunion, 97866 Saint-Paul, Reunion
| | - Eric Rene
- Établissement public de santé mentale de La Réunion, 97866 Saint-Paul, Reunion
| | - Noor Atwan
- Établissement public de santé mentale de La Réunion, 97866 Saint-Paul, Reunion
| | - Louis Jehel
- Équipe MOODS, Inserm, centre de recherche en épidémiologie et santé des populations (CESP, UMR-1018), Villejuif, France; Centre hospitalier universitaire de Martinique, hôpital Pierre Zobda-Quitman, 97261 Fort-de-France, Martinique
| | - Michel Spodenkiewicz
- Équipe MOODS, Inserm, centre de recherche en épidémiologie et santé des populations (CESP, UMR-1018), Villejuif, France; Pôle de santé mentale, CIC-EC 1410, université, CHU de La Réunion, 97448 Saint-Pierre, Reunion; McGill Group for Suicide Studies, Department of Psychiatry, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Phillips M, İnce B, Webb H, Dalton B, McCombie C, Irish M, Mercado D, Peachey G, Zenasni Z, Himmerich H, Robinson P, Arcelus J, Byford S, Treasure J, Landau S, Lawrence V, Schmidt U. Autopsy of a failed trial part 1: A qualitative investigation of clinician's views on and experiences of the implementation of the DAISIES trial in UK-based intensive eating disorder services. EUROPEAN EATING DISORDERS REVIEW 2023; 31:489-504. [PMID: 36952308 PMCID: PMC10946575 DOI: 10.1002/erv.2975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The DAISIES trial, comparing inpatient and stepped-care day patient treatment for adults with severe anorexia nervosa was prematurely terminated in March 2022 due to poor recruitment. This qualitative study seeks to understand the difficulties faced during the trial by investigating stakeholders' views on and experiences of its implementation. METHOD Semi-structured interview and focus group transcripts, and trial management and oversight group meeting minutes from May 2020-June 2022 were analysed using thematic analysis. Participants were 47 clinicians and co-investigators involved with the DAISIES trial. The Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) framework was applied to the interpretive themes to classify barriers and facilitators to implementation. RESULTS Five themes were identified: incompatible participation interests; changing standard practice; concerns around clinical management; systemic capacity and capability issues; and Covid-19 disrupting implementation. Applying the NASSS framework indicated the greatest implementation challenges to arise with the adopters (e.g. patients, clinicians), the organisational systems (e.g. service capacity), and the wider socio-political context (e.g. Covid-19 closing services). CONCLUSIONS Our findings emphasise the top-down impact of systemic-level research implementation challenges. The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic accentuated pre-existing organisational barriers to trial implementation within intensive eating disorder services, further limiting the capacity for research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Phillips
- Section of Eating DisordersDepartment of Psychological MedicineInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Başak İnce
- Section of Eating DisordersDepartment of Psychological MedicineInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Hannah Webb
- Section of Eating DisordersDepartment of Psychological MedicineInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Bethan Dalton
- Section of Eating DisordersDepartment of Psychological MedicineInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Catherine McCombie
- Department of Health Service and Population ResearchInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Madeleine Irish
- Section of Eating DisordersDepartment of Psychological MedicineInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Daniela Mercado
- Section of Eating DisordersDepartment of Psychological MedicineInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Gemma Peachey
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustMaudsley HospitalLondonUK
| | - Zohra Zenasni
- Department of Biostatistics and Health InformaticsInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Hubertus Himmerich
- Section of Eating DisordersDepartment of Psychological MedicineInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustMaudsley HospitalLondonUK
| | - Paul Robinson
- Division of MedicineUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Jon Arcelus
- Institute of Mental HealthUniversity of NottinghamJubilee CampusNottinghamUK
| | - Sarah Byford
- Department of Health Service and Population ResearchInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Janet Treasure
- Section of Eating DisordersDepartment of Psychological MedicineInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustMaudsley HospitalLondonUK
| | - Sabine Landau
- Department of Biostatistics and Health InformaticsInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Vanessa Lawrence
- Department of Health Service and Population ResearchInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Ulrike Schmidt
- Section of Eating DisordersDepartment of Psychological MedicineInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustMaudsley HospitalLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|