1
|
Fleury MJ, Imboua A, Grenier G. Barriers and Facilitators to High Emergency Department Use Among Patients with Mental Disorders: A Qualitative Investigation. Community Ment Health J 2024; 60:869-884. [PMID: 38383882 DOI: 10.1007/s10597-024-01239-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
This qualitative study explored reasons for high emergency department (ED) use (3 + visits/year) among 299 patients with mental disorders (MD) recruited in four ED in Quebec, Canada. A conceptual framework including healthcare system and ED organizational features, patient profiles, and professional practice guided the content analysis. Results highlighted insufficient access to and inadequacy of outpatient care. While some patients were quite satisfied with ED care, most criticized the lack of referrals or follow-up care. Patient profiles justifying high ED use were strongly associated with health and social issues perceived as needing immediate care. The main barriers in professional practice involved lack of MD expertise among primary care clinicians, and insufficient follow-up by psychiatrists in response to patient needs. Collaboration with outpatient care may be prioritized to reduce high ED use and improve ED interventions by strengthening the discharge process, and increasing access to outpatient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Josée Fleury
- Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, 1033 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, QC, H3A 1A1, Canada.
- Douglas Hospital Research Centre, 6875 LaSalle Blvd, Montreal, QC, H4H 1R3, Canada.
| | - Armelle Imboua
- Douglas Hospital Research Centre, 6875 LaSalle Blvd, Montreal, QC, H4H 1R3, Canada
| | - Guy Grenier
- Douglas Hospital Research Centre, 6875 LaSalle Blvd, Montreal, QC, H4H 1R3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Santillanes G, Foster AA, Ishimine P, Berg K, Cheng T, Deitrich A, Heniff M, Hooley G, Pulcini C, Ruttan T, Sorrentino A, Waseem M, Saidinejad M. Management of youth with suicidal ideation: Challenges and best practices for emergency departments. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open 2024; 5:e13141. [PMID: 38571489 PMCID: PMC10989674 DOI: 10.1002/emp2.13141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Revised: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Suicide is a leading cause of death among youth, and emergency departments (EDs) play an important role in caring for youth with suicidality. Shortages in outpatient and inpatient mental and behavioral health capacity combined with a surge in ED visits for youth with suicidal ideation (SI) and self-harm challenge many EDs in the United States. This review highlights currently identified best practices that all EDs can implement in suicide screening, assessment of youth with self-harm and SI, care for patients awaiting inpatient psychiatric care, and discharge planning for youth determined not to require inpatient treatment. We will also highlight several controversies and challenges in implementation of these best practices in the ED. An enhanced continuum of care model recommended for youth with mental and behavioral health crises utilizes crisis lines, mobile crisis units, crisis receiving and stabilization units, and also maximizes interventions in home- and community-based settings. However, while local systems work to enhance continuum capacity, EDs remain a critical part of crisis care. Currently, EDs face barriers to providing optimal treatment for youth in crisis due to inadequate resources including the ability to obtain emergent mental health consultations via on-site professionals, telepsychiatry, and ED transfer agreements. To reduce ED utilization and better facilitate safe dispositions from EDs, the expansion of community- and home-based services, pediatric-receiving crisis stabilization units, inpatient psychiatric services, among other innovative solutions, is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Genevieve Santillanes
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of USCLos Angeles General Medical CenterLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Ashley A. Foster
- Department of Emergency MedicineUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Paul Ishimine
- Departments of Emergency Medicine and PediatricsUniversity of California, San Diego School of Medicine, UC San Diego Health and Rady Children's HospitalSan DiegoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Kathleen Berg
- Department of Pediatrics, Dell Medical SchoolThe University of TexasAustinTexasUSA
| | - Tabitha Cheng
- Department of Emergency MedicineHarbor UCLA Medical CenterDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLALos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Ann Deitrich
- Division Chief Pediatric Emergency MedicineDepartment of Emergency MedicinePrisma HealthUniversity of South Carolina School of MedicineGreenvilleSouth CarolinaUSA
| | - Melanie Heniff
- Departments of Emergency Medicine and PediatricsIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisIndianaUSA
| | - Gwen Hooley
- Division of Emergency and Transport MedicineChildren's Hospital Los AngelesLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Christian Pulcini
- Department of Emergency Medicine and PediatricsUniversity of Vermont Larner College of MedicineBurlingtonVermontUSA
| | - Timothy Ruttan
- Department of PediatricsDell Medical SchoolThe University of Texas at Austin. US Acute Care SolutionsCantonOhioUSA
| | - Annalise Sorrentino
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency MedicineUniversity of AlabamaBirminghamAlabamaUSA
| | - Muhammad Waseem
- Lincoln Medical Center, Bronx New York; Weill Cornell MedicineNew YorkUSA
| | - Mohsen Saidinejad
- Departments of Emergency Medicine and PediatricsDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLALos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
- The Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor UCLATorranceCaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Smith JG, Anderson K, Clarke G, Crowe C, Goldsmith LP, Jarman H, Johnson S, Lomani J, McDaid D, Park AL, Turner K, Gillard S. The effect of psychiatric decision unit services on inpatient admissions and mental health presentations in emergency departments: an interrupted time series analysis from two cities and one rural area in England. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 2024; 33:e15. [PMID: 38512000 DOI: 10.1017/s2045796024000209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
AIMS High-quality evidence is lacking for the impact on healthcare utilisation of short-stay alternatives to psychiatric inpatient services for people experiencing acute and/or complex mental health crises (known in England as psychiatric decision units [PDUs]). We assessed the extent to which changes in psychiatric hospital and emergency department (ED) activity were explained by implementation of PDUs in England using a quasi-experimental approach. METHODS We conducted an interrupted time series (ITS) analysis of weekly aggregated data pre- and post-PDU implementation in one rural and two urban sites using segmented regression, adjusting for temporal and seasonal trends. Primary outcomes were changes in the number of voluntary inpatient admissions to (acute) adult psychiatric wards and number of ED adult mental health-related attendances in the 24 months post-PDU implementation compared to that in the 24 months pre-PDU implementation. RESULTS The two PDUs (one urban and one rural) with longer (average) stays and high staff-to-patient ratios observed post-PDU decreases in the pattern of weekly voluntary psychiatric admissions relative to pre-PDU trend (Rural: -0.45%/week, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.78%, -0.12%; Urban: -0.49%/week, 95% CI = -0.73%, -0.25%); PDU implementation in each was associated with an estimated 35-38% reduction in total voluntary admissions in the post-PDU period. The (urban) PDU with the highest throughput, lowest staff-to-patient ratio and shortest average stay observed a 20% (-20.4%, CI = -29.7%, -10.0%) level reduction in mental health-related ED attendances post-PDU, although there was little impact on long-term trend. Pooled analyses across sites indicated a significant reduction in the number of voluntary admissions following PDU implementation (-16.6%, 95% CI = -23.9%, -8.5%) but no significant (long-term) trend change (-0.20%/week, 95% CI = -0.74%, 0.34%) and no short- (-2.8%, 95% CI = -19.3%, 17.0%) or long-term (0.08%/week, 95% CI = -0.13, 0.28%) effects on mental health-related ED attendances. Findings were largely unchanged in secondary (ITS) analyses that considered the introduction of other service initiatives in the study period. CONCLUSIONS The introduction of PDUs was associated with an immediate reduction of voluntary psychiatric inpatient admissions. The extent to which PDUs change long-term trends of voluntary psychiatric admissions or impact on psychiatric presentations at ED may be linked to their configuration. PDUs with a large capacity, short length of stay and low staff-to-patient ratio can positively impact ED mental health presentations, while PDUs with longer length of stay and higher staff-to-patient ratios have potential to reduce voluntary psychiatric admissions over an extended period. Taken as a whole, our analyses suggest that when establishing a PDU, consideration of the primary crisis-care need that underlies the creation of the unit is key.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J G Smith
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK
- Clinical Research Unit, South West London & St George's Mental Health Trust, Springfield University Hospital, London, UK
| | - K Anderson
- Department of Psychology, Middlesex University, London, UK
| | - G Clarke
- Improvement Analytics Unit, The Health Foundation, London, UK
| | - C Crowe
- Sunflowers Court Inpatient Unit, North East London NHS Foundation Trust, Goodmayes Hospital, Ilford, UK
| | - L P Goldsmith
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - H Jarman
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK
- Emergency Department, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - S Johnson
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
- Early Intervention Service, Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - J Lomani
- NHS England and NHS Improvement, London, UK
| | - D McDaid
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - A L Park
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - K Turner
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - S Gillard
- School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Huber JP, Milton A, Brewer MC, Norrie LM, Hartog SM, Glozier N. The effectiveness of brief non-pharmacological interventions in emergency departments and psychiatric inpatient units for people in crisis: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2024; 58:207-226. [PMID: 38140961 DOI: 10.1177/00048674231216348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Heterogeneous brief non-pharmacological interventions and guidelines exist to treat the burgeoning presentations to both emergency department and inpatient settings, for those in a crisis of mental ill-health. We systematically reviewed the literature to create a taxonomy of these brief non-pharmacological interventions, and review their evaluation methods and effectiveness. METHOD We conducted a systematic review across Cochrane, CINAHL, DARE, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO databases. Studies meeting quality criteria, using Joanna Briggs Institute tools, were eligible. Interventions were categorised, and outcomes synthesised. RESULTS Thirty-nine studies were included: 8 randomised controlled trials, 17 quasi-experimental, 11 qualitative studies, and 3 file audits. Taxonomy produced six coherent intervention types: Skills-focussed, Environment-focussed, Special Observation, Psychoeducation, Multicomponent Group and Multicomponent Individual. Despite this, a broad and inconsistent range of outcome measures reflected different outcome priorities and prevented systematic comparison of different types of intervention or meta-analysis. Few brief non-pharmacological interventions had consistent evidential support: sensory modulation rooms consistently improved distress in inpatient settings. Short admissions may reduce suicide attempts and readmission, if accompanied by psychotherapy. Suicide-specific interventions in emergency departments may improve depressive symptoms, but not suicide attempt rates. There was evidence that brief non-pharmacological interventions did not reduce incidence of self-harm on inpatient wards. We found no evidence for frequently used interventions such as no-suicide contracting, special observation or inpatient self-harm interventions. CONCLUSION Categorising brief non-pharmacological interventions is feasible, but an evidence base for many is severely limited if not missing. Even when there is evidence, the inconsistency in outcomes often precludes clinicians from making inferences, although some interventions show promise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline P Huber
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course, Australian Research Council, Canberra, ACT, Australia
- Mental Health, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Alyssa Milton
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course, Australian Research Council, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Matthew C Brewer
- Mental Health, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Louisa M Norrie
- Mental Health, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Saskia M Hartog
- Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course, Australian Research Council, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Nick Glozier
- Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course, Australian Research Council, Canberra, ACT, Australia
- Mental Health, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fleury MJ, Cao Z, Grenier G. Characteristics for Low, High and Very High Emergency Department Use for Mental Health Diagnoses from Health Records and Structured Interviews. West J Emerg Med 2024; 25:144-154. [PMID: 38596910 PMCID: PMC11000562 DOI: 10.5811/westjem.18327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Revised: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Patients with mental health diagnoses (MHD) are among the most frequent emergency department (ED) users, suggesting the importance of identifying additional factors associated with their ED use frequency. In this study we assessed various patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and service use associated with low ED users (1-3 visits/year), compared to high (4-7) and very high (8+) ED users with MHD. Methods Our study was conducted in four large Quebec (Canada) ED networks. A total of 299 patients with MHD were randomly recruited from these ED in 2021-2022. Structured interviews complemented data from network health records, providing extensive data on participant profiles and their quality of care. We used multivariable multinomial logistic regression to compare low ED use to high and very high ED use. Results Over a 12-month period, 39% of patients were low ED users, 37% high, and 24% very high ED users. Compared with low ED users, those at greater probability for high or very high ED use exhibited more violent/disturbed behaviors or social problems, chronic physical illnesses, and barriers to unmet needs. Patients previously hospitalized 1-2 times had lower risk of high or very high ED use than those not previously hospitalized. Compared with low ED users, high and very high ED users showed higher prevalence of personality disorders and suicidal behaviors, respectively. Women had greater probability of high ED use than men. Patients living in rental housing had greater probability of being very high ED users than those living in private housing. Using at least 5+ primary care services and being recurrent ED users two years prior to the last year of ED use had increased probability of very high ED use. Conclusion Frequency of ED use was associated with complex issues and higher perceived barriers to unmet needs among patients. Very high ED users had more severe recurrent conditions, such as isolation and suicidal behaviors, despite using more primary care services. Results suggested substantial reduction of barriers to care and improvement on both access and continuity of care for these vulnerable patients, integrating crisis resolution and supported housing services. Limited hospitalizations may sometimes be indicated, protecting against ED use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Josée Fleury
- McGill University, Department of Psychiatry, Montreal, Canada
- Douglas Mental Health University Research Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Zhirong Cao
- Douglas Mental Health University Research Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Guy Grenier
- Douglas Mental Health University Research Centre, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Meadows J, Montano M, Alfar AJK, Başkan ÖY, De Brún C, Hill J, McClatchey R, Kallfa N, Fernandes GS. The impact of the cost-of-living crisis on population health in the UK: rapid evidence review. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:561. [PMID: 38388342 PMCID: PMC10882727 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-17940-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the UK, unique and unforeseen factors, including COVID-19, Brexit, and Ukraine-Russia war, have resulted in an unprecedented cost of living crisis, creating a second health emergency. We present, one of the first rapid reviews with the aim of examining the impact of this current crisis, at a population level. We reviewed published literature, as well as grey literature, examining a broad range of physical and mental impacts on health in the short, mid, and long term, identifying those most at risk, impacts on system partners, including emergency services and the third sector, as well as mitigation strategies. METHODS We conducted a rapid review by searching PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and HMIC (2020 to 2023). We searched for grey literature on Google and hand-searched the reports of relevant public health organisations. We included interventional and observational studies that reported outcomes of interventions aimed at mitigating against the impacts of cost of living at a population level. RESULTS We found that the strongest evidence was for the impact of cold and mouldy homes on respiratory-related infections and respiratory conditions. Those at an increased risk were young children (0-4 years), the elderly (aged 75 and over), as well as those already vulnerable, including those with long-term multimorbidity. Further short-term impacts include an increased risk of physical pain including musculoskeletal and chest pain, and increased risk of enteric infections and malnutrition. In the mid-term, we could see increases in hypertension, transient ischaemic attacks, and myocardial infarctions, and respiratory illnesses. In the long term we could see an increase in mortality and morbidity rates from respiratory and cardiovascular disease, as well as increase rates of suicide and self-harm and infectious disease outcomes. Changes in behaviour are likely particularly around changes in food buying patterns and the ability to heat a home. System partners are also impacted, with voluntary sectors seeing fewer volunteers, an increase in petty crime and theft, alternative heating appliances causing fires, and an increase in burns and burn-related admissions. To mitigate against these impacts, support should be provided, to the most vulnerable, to help increase disposable income, reduce energy bills, and encourage home improvements linked with energy efficiency. Stronger links to bridge voluntary, community, charity and faith groups are needed to help provide additional aid and support. CONCLUSION Although the CoL crisis affects the entire population, the impacts are exacerbated in those that are most vulnerable, particularly young children, single parents, multigenerational families. More can be done at a community and societal level to support the most vulnerable, and those living with long-term multimorbidity. This review consolidates the current evidence on the impacts of the cost of living crisis and may enable decision makers to target limited resources more effectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jade Meadows
- South West Critical Thinking Unit, Health Care Public Health Directorate, NHS England, Bristol, United Kingdom.
| | - Miranda Montano
- Public Health Intelligence Team, Devon County Council, Exeter, England
| | - Abdelrahman J K Alfar
- South West Critical Thinking Unit, Health Care Public Health Directorate, NHS England, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Global Business School for Health (GBSH), University College London (UCL), London, United Kingdom
| | - Ömer Yetkin Başkan
- South West Critical Thinking Unit, Health Care Public Health Directorate, NHS England, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Caroline De Brún
- Knowledge and Library Services, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer Hill
- Knowledge and Library Services, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rachael McClatchey
- Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, DHSC, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, England
| | - Nevila Kallfa
- South West Critical Thinking Unit, Health Care Public Health Directorate, NHS England, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Gwen Sascha Fernandes
- South West Critical Thinking Unit, Health Care Public Health Directorate, NHS England, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Iwanaga M, Yamaguchi S, Hashimoto S, Hanaoka S, Kaneyuki H, Fujita K, Kishi Y, Hirata T, Fujii C, Sugiyama N. Ranking important predictors of the need for a high-acuity psychiatry unit among 2,064 inpatients admitted to psychiatric emergency hospitals: a random forest model. Front Psychiatry 2024; 15:1303189. [PMID: 38389987 PMCID: PMC10882085 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1303189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Aims In order to uphold and enhance the emergency psychiatric care system, a thorough comprehension of the characteristics of patients who require a high-acuity psychiatry unit is indispensable. We aimed to clarify the most important predictors of the need for a high-acuity psychiatry unit using a random forest model. Methods This cross-sectional study encompassed patients admitted to psychiatric emergency hospitals at 161 medical institutions across Japan between December 8, 2022, and January 31, 2023. Questionnaires were completed by psychiatrists, with a maximum of 30 patients assessed per medical institution. The questionnaires included psychiatrists' assessment of the patient's condition (exposure variables) and the need for a high-acuity psychiatry unit (outcome variables). The exposure variables consisted of 32 binary variables, including age, diagnoses, and clinical condition (i.e., factors on the clinical profile, emergency treatment requirements, and purpose of hospitalization). The outcome variable was the need for a high-acuity psychiatry unit, scored from 0 to 10. To identify the most important predictors of the need for a high-acuity psychiatry unit, we used a random forest model. As a sensitivity analysis, multivariate linear regression analysis was performed. Results Data on 2,164 patients from 81 medical institutions were obtained (response rate, 50.3%). After excluding participants with missing values, this analysis included 2,064 patients. Of the 32 items, the top-5 predictors of the need for a high-acuity psychiatry unit were the essentiality of inpatient treatment (otherwise, symptoms will worsen or linger), need for 24-hour professional care, symptom severity, safety ensured by specialized equipment, and medication management. These items were each significantly and positively associated with the need for a high-acuity psychiatry unit in linear regression analyses (p < 0.001 for all). Conversely, items on age and diagnosis were lower in the ranking and were not statistically significant in linear regression models. Conclusion Items related to the patient's clinical profile might hold greater importance in predicting the need for a high-acuity psychiatry unit than do items associated with age and diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mai Iwanaga
- Department of Community Mental Health and Law, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sosei Yamaguchi
- Department of Community Mental Health and Law, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoshi Hashimoto
- Department of Psychiatry, National Hospital Organization Kumamoto Medical Center, Kumamoto, Japan
| | | | - Hiroshi Kaneyuki
- Yamaguchi Prefectural Mental Health Medical Center, Yamaguchi, Japan
| | - Kiyoshi Fujita
- Okehazama Hospital Fujita Kokoro Care Center, Toyoake-shi, Japan
| | - Yoshiki Kishi
- Department of Psychiatry, Okayama Psychiatric Medical Center, Okayama, Japan
| | | | - Chiyo Fujii
- Department of Community Mental Health and Law, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoya Sugiyama
- Department of Community Mental Health and Law, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan
- Numazu Chuo Hospital, Numazu, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mark TL, Henretty K, Gibbons BJ, Zarkin GA. Association of Arizona's Implementation of a Behavioral Health Crisis Response System With Suicide Hospitalizations. Psychiatr Serv 2024; 75:148-154. [PMID: 37554005 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.20220628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In July 2022, the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline went live. The Lifeline is part of larger federal and state efforts to build comprehensive behavioral health crisis response systems that include mobile crisis units and crisis diversion and stabilization centers. Comprehensive response systems are anticipated to reduce hospitalizations for suicide and other behavioral health crises; however, research testing this assumption has been limited. The authors used Arizona-a state known for its comprehensive crisis system-to determine the association between state implementation of a comprehensive behavioral health crisis response system and suicide-related hospitalizations. METHODS A comparative interrupted time-series (CITS) design was used to compare changes in suicide-related hospitalizations after the 2015 implementation of Arizona's crisis response system (N=215,063). Data were from the 2010-2019 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) State Inpatient Databases (SID). Nevada (N=84,091 hospitalizations) was used as a comparison state because it is a western state that had not yet implemented a comprehensive crisis system and had available HCUP SID data. The CITS model included controls for time-varying differences in state demographic composition. RESULTS From 2010 to 2014 to 2019, annual suicide-related hospitalizations in Arizona increased from 122.0 to 324.2 to 584.5, respectively, per 100,000 people, and in Nevada, hospitalizations increased from 94.7 to 263.2 to 595.5, respectively, per 100,000 people. Arizona's crisis response system was associated with a significant relative decrease in the quarterly trend of 2.57 suicide-related hospitalizations per 100,000 people (p=0.033). CONCLUSIONS More research is needed to understand how the implementation of a comprehensive crisis response system may affect suicide-related hospitalizations.
Collapse
|
9
|
Tucker K, Zikos D, Vick DJ. Association of Hospital Readmission Rates With Discharge Disposition for Patients With Psychotic Disorders. J Healthc Manag 2023; 68:198-214. [PMID: 37159018 DOI: 10.1097/jhm-d-22-00115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
GOAL We explored how readmissions may result from patients' lack of access to aftercare services, failure to adhere to psychotropic medication plans, and inability to understand and follow hospital discharge recommendations. We also investigated whether insurance status, demographics, and socioeconomic status are associated with hospital readmissions. This study is important because readmissions contribute to increased personal and hospital expenses and decreased community tenure (the ability to maintain stability between hospital admissions). Addressing hospital readmissions will promote optimal discharge practices beginning on day one of hospital admission. METHODS The study examined the differences in hospital readmission rates for patients with a primary psychotic disorder diagnosis. Discharge data were drawn in 2017 from the Nationwide Readmissions Database. Inclusion criteria included patients aged 0-89 years who were readmitted to a hospital between less than 24 hr and up to 30 days from discharge. Exclusion criteria were principal medical diagnoses, unplanned 30-day readmissions, and discharges against medical advice. The sampling frame included 269,906 weighted number of patients diagnosed with a psychotic disorder treated at one of 2,355 U.S. community hospitals. The sample size was 148,529 unweighted numbers of patients discharged. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS In a logistic regression model, weighted variables were calculated and used to determine an association between the discharge dispositions and readmissions. After controlling for hospital characteristics and patient demographics, we found that the odds for readmission for routine and short-term hospital discharge dispositions decreased for home health care discharges, which indicated that home health care can prevent readmissions. The finding was statistically significant when controlling for payer type and patient age and gender. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS The findings support home health care as an effective option for patients with severe psychosis. Home health care reduces readmissions and is recommended, when appropriate, as an aftercare service following inpatient hospitalization and may enhance the quality of patient care. Improving healthcare quality involves optimizing, streamlining, and promoting standardized processes in discharge planning and direct transitions to aftercare services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kariba Tucker
- School of Health Sciences, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, Michigan
| | - Dimitrios Zikos
- School of Health Sciences and Herbert H. & Grace A. Dow College of Health Professions, Central Michigan University
| | - Dan J Vick
- School of Health Sciences and Herbert H. & Grace A. Dow College of Health Professions, Central Michigan University
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dinh MM, Bein KJ, Alkhouri H, Ní Bhraonáin S, Seimon RV. 24 hours - Life in the E.R.: A state-wide data linkage analysis of in-patients with prolonged emergency department length of stay in New South Wales, Australia. Emerg Med Australas 2023. [PMID: 36854419 DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.14183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2022] [Revised: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/29/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Describe the characteristics and predictors of mortality for patients who spend more than 24 h in the ED waiting for an in-patient bed and compare baseline clinical and demographic characteristics between tertiary and non-tertiary hospitals. METHODS This was a state-wide analysis data linkage analysis of adult (age >16 years) ED presentations across New South Wales from 2019 to 2020. Cases were included if their mode of separation from ED indicated admission to an in-patient unit including critical care ward and their ED length of stay was greater than or equal to 24 h. Cases were categorised by service-related groups based on principle diagnosis. RESULTS A total of 26 854 eligible cases were identified. The most common diagnosis groups were psychiatry, cardiology and respiratory. The odds ratio (OR) for 30-day all-cause mortality in admitted patients with an ED length of stay greater than 24 h were highest in those aged >75 years (OR 15.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 9.99-23.07, P < 0.001), oncology (OR 10.45, 95% CI 7.93-13.77, P < 0.001) and haematology patients (OR 2.95, 95% CI 2.01-4.33, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Interventions and models of care to address ED access block need to focus on mental health patients, older patients particularly those with cardiorespiratory illness and oncology and haematology patients for whom risk of mortality is disproportionately higher.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael M Dinh
- Sydney Local Health District, RPA Green Light Institute for Emergency Care, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Emergency Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kendall J Bein
- Sydney Local Health District, RPA Green Light Institute for Emergency Care, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Emergency Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hatem Alkhouri
- Emergency Care Institute, Agency for Clinical Innovation, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sinéad Ní Bhraonáin
- Emergency Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Radhika V Seimon
- Sydney Local Health District, RPA Green Light Institute for Emergency Care, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Goldsmith LP, Anderson K, Clarke G, Crowe C, Jarman H, Johnson S, Lomani J, McDaid D, Park AL, Smith JG, Gillard S. Service use preceding and following first referral for psychiatric emergency care at a short-stay crisis unit: A cohort study across three cities and one rural area in England. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2022:207640221142530. [PMID: 36527189 DOI: 10.1177/00207640221142530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Internationally, hospital-based short-stay crisis units have been introduced to provide a safe space for stabilisation and further assessment for those in psychiatric crisis. The units typically aim to reduce inpatient admissions and psychiatric presentations to emergency departments. AIMS To assess changes to service use following a service user's first visit to a unit, characterise the population accessing these units and examine equality of access to the units. METHODS A prospective cohort study design (ISCTRN registered; 53431343) compared service use for the 9 months preceding and following a first visit to a short-stay crisis unit at three cities and one rural area in England. Included individuals first visited a unit in the 6 months between 01/September/2020 and 28/February/2021. RESULTS The prospective cohort included 1189 individuals aged 36 years on average, significantly younger (by 5-13 years) than the population of local service users (<.001). Seventy percent were White British and most were without a psychiatric diagnosis (55%-82% across sites). The emergency department provided the largest single source of referrals to the unit (42%), followed by the Crisis and Home Treatment Team (20%). The use of most mental health services, including all types of admission and community mental health services was increased post discharge. Social-distancing measures due to the COVID-19 pandemic were in place for slightly over 50% of the follow-up period. Comparison to a pre-COVID cohort of 934 individuals suggested that the pandemic had no effect on the majority of service use variables. CONCLUSIONS Short-stay crisis units are typically accessed by a young population, including those who previously were unknown to mental health services, who proceed to access a broader range of mental health services following discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Chloe Crowe
- North East London NHS Foundation Trust, Goodmayes Hospital, Ilford, UK
| | - Heather Jarman
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, UK.,St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sonia Johnson
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London - Bloomsbury, UK
| | - Jo Lomani
- NHS England and NHS Improvement, London, UK
| | - David McDaid
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK
| | - A-La Park
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK
| | - Jared G Smith
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, UK
| | - Steven Gillard
- School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|