An evaluation of community-based psychiatric care for people with treated long-term mental illness

Establishing a mental health liaison attachment with primary care

The role of the general practitioner (GP) in the care of individuals with mental health problems has long been recognised. Goldberg & Huxleys' (1980) pioneering work on the pathways to mental health care demonstrated that only a fraction of identified mental health problems are referred on to psychiatrists. Goldberg & Bridges (1987) estimated that between 20 and 25% of a GP's workload concerns mental health, with only about 5% referred on to psychiatrists. Shepherd (1991) insisted that the only real hope for significant improvement in mental health care lay in the improvement of GP provision – there will simply never be enough psychiatrists.

Residential care homes for the mentally ill

Aims and Method

This study describes residents in seven care homes, reviews their usage of mental health services and evaluates cost implications of psychiatric health care provision.

Results

The patients are predominantly male with multiple diagnoses who are receiving psychiatric health care, but in general lack structured rehabilitation services. Forty-seven per cent of the residents moved into the trust catchment area in order to occupy the placement.The cost associated with the provision of differing models of out-patients care varies considerably.

Clinical Implications

These vulnerable residents are costing the mental health service relatively little, although the total cost to society is higher.This study points to the necessity of multiagency planning for 'new long-stay' patients.

Utilization of the supports intensity scale with psychiatric populations: psychometric properties and utility for service delivery planning

In agreement with the new paradigm of supports, this study examines the adequacy and psychometric properties of the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS) in a sample of 182 participants with severe mental illness (mean Global Assessment of Functioning [GAF] score = 60.2). The measure focuses on identifying the profile and intensities of support needs and on the planning and service delivery rather than on weaknesses and limitations. Internal consistency indexes ranged from .83 to .97; interrater reliability indexes ranged from .67 to .98. Intercorrelations among SIS subscales supported its construct validity. SIS scores correlated to GAF scores and length of disease. Discriminant analysis correctly classified 60.9% of participants. Therefore, the SIS demonstrated adequate reliability and validity, and it can be used by nursing professionals to plan for required supports in this population.

Community mental health teams (CMHTs) for people with severe mental illnesses and disordered personality

BACKGROUND

Closure of asylums and institutions for the mentally ill, coupled with government policies focusing on reducing the number of hospital beds for people with severe mental illness in favour of providing care in a variety of non-hospital settings, underpins the rationale behind care in the community. A major thrust towards community care has been the development of community mental health teams (CMHT).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of community mental health team (CMHT) treatment for anyone with serious mental illness compared with standard non-team management.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched The Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (March 2006). We manually searched the Journal of Personality Disorders, and contacted colleagues at ENMESH, ISSPD and in forensic psychiatry.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled trials of CMHT management versus non-team standard care.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We extracted data independently. For dichotomous data we calculated relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) on an intention-to-treat basis, based on a fixed effects model. We calculated numbers needed to treat/harm (NNT/NNH) where appropriate. For continuous data, we calculated weighted mean differences (WMD) again based on a fixed effects model.

MAIN RESULTS

CMHT management did not reveal any statistically significant difference in death by suicide and in suspicious circumstances (n=587, 3 RCTs, RR 0.49 CI 0.1 to 2.2) although overall, fewer deaths occurred in the CMHT group. We found no significant differences in the number of people leaving the studies early (n=253, 2 RCTs, RR 1.10 CI 0.7 to 1.8). Significantly fewer people in the CMHT group were not satisfied with services compared with those receiving standard care (n=87, RR 0.37 CI 0.2 to 0.8, NNT 4 CI 3 to 11). Also, hospital admission rates were significantly lower in the CMHT group (n=587, 3 RCTs, RR 0.81 CI 0.7 to 1.0, NNT 17 CI 10 to 104) compared with standard care. Admittance to accident and emergency services, contact with primary care, and contact with social services did not reveal any statistical difference between comparison groups.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Community mental health team management is not inferior to non-team standard care in any important respects and is superior in promoting greater acceptance of treatment. It may also be superior in reducing hospital admission and avoiding death by suicide. The evidence for CMHT based care is insubstantial considering the massive impact the drive toward community care has on patients, carers, clinicians and the community at large.

Schizophrenia in general practice: a national survey of general practitioners in Ireland

BACKGROUND

Chronic schizophrenia is challenging to manage in primary care.

AIMS

We sought to establish the views of General Practitioners about managing patients with chronic schizophrenia in primary care.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, postal survey questionnaire of a randomly selected sample of 20% of GPs was carried out.

RESULTS

Most GPs (97.2%) have at least one person with schizophrenia attending their practice. A substantial number of GPs (22.2%) treat cases of schizophrenia without specialist input following an initial referral to psychiatric services. Almost all (88.7%) advised patients who had experienced multiple relapses to remain on medication indefinitely. One third of GPs reported that they always experience difficulties managing patients with schizophrenia in their practice. Non-adherence with prescribed medication and loss to follow-up were the commonest impediments to treatment encountered.

CONCLUSION

GPs require appropriate back up from specialist services to enable their management of chronic schizophrenia.

Quality of life of community-based chronic schizophrenia patients in Penang, Malaysia

OBJECTIVE

This is a study of the quality of life (QOL) of 174 community-based chronic schizophrenia patients in Penang, Malaysia.

METHOD

The study samples were selected from the Out Patient Department, Department of Psychiatry, Penang General Hospital, Malaysia. The data was collected through personal interviews with the respondents. A questionnaire prepared by the research team was used to collect data on background characteristics. Lehman's (1988) Quality of Life Interview was used to collect data on patients' QOL.

RESULT

Equal number of males and females participated in the study. The interviews on QOL indicated problems in the areas of life in general, place of living, daily activities, social relations, finance, work and general health. The results also revealed that community-based schizophrenia patients had acute poverty and experienced social isolation, discrimination and exploitation in the workplace.

CONCLUSION

Implications of these results on the implementation process of National Mental Health Policy in Malaysia are discussed. The research paper also discusses the negative impacts of limited rehabilitation facilities available in the community and its implications on the QOL of severely mentally ill patients. The need for immediate research attention on QOL of such patients in the South-east Asian region has been highlighted.

Comparisons between schizophrenia patients recruited from Australian general practices and public mental health services

OBJECTIVE

To examine differences between samples of schizophrenia patients recruited from general practice and public mental health services.

METHOD

Demographic, psychosocial, disability and 12-month service utilization data are reported from a multicentered survey of psychotic disorders and an associated study of schizophrenia in general practice. Patients with schizophrenia from three recruitment sources (in-patient, community services, general practice) were compared.

RESULTS

General practice patients had fewer symptoms, better functioning, lower service use, but comparable substance abuse, to patients from mental health services. They were generally similar to community mental health patients, with the exception of family support, premorbid work adjustment, negative symptoms and disability. Service contact models are also reported which demonstrate that general practitioners deal with schizophrenia patients across the range of illness severity and acuity.

CONCLUSION

Recruitment source impacts in schizophrenia research need to be more carefully considered during sample selection and better accounted for in the interpretation of results.

Community mental health teams (CMHTs) for people with severe mental illnesses and disordered personality

BACKGROUND

Closure of asylums and institutions for the mentally ill, coupled with government policies focusing on reducing the number of hospital beds for people with severe mental illness in favour of providing care in a variety of non-hospital settings underpins the rationale behind care in the community. A major thrust towards community care has been the development of community mental health teams (CMHT).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of community mental health team (CMHT) treatment for anyone with serious mental illness.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic searches of Biological Abstracts (1982-1997), the Cochrane Library (1998, Issue 2), EMBASE (1980-1997), MEDLINE (1966-1997), PsycLIT (1974-1997) and SCISEARCH (1997) were undertaken. The Journal of Personality Disorders was hand searched, and contact was made with colleagues at ENMESH, ISSPD and in forensic psychiatry.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials of CMHT management versus non-team standard care.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The selection of trials, assessment of quality and data extraction was undertaken independently and in parallel by two reviewers. Where possible the data were entered into RevMan and an intention-to-treat analysis undertaken. Tests of heterogeneity were undertaken.

MAIN RESULTS

CMHT management may be associated with fewer deaths by suicide and in suspicious circumstances (OR 0.32 CI 0.09-1.12). It causes less people to be dissatisfied with their care (OR 0.34 CI 0.2-0.59) and to leave the studies early (OR 0.61 CI 0.45-0.83). No clear difference was found in admission rates, overall clinical outcomes and duration of in-patient hospital treatment, although this was partly a consequence of poorly presented data.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Community mental health team management is not inferior to non-team standard care in any important respects and is superior in promoting greater acceptance of treatment. It may also be superior in reducing hospital admission and avoiding death by suicide.

Shared care for high-dependency patients: mental illness, neurological disorders and terminal care--a review

Changes in the structure of health services in the UK have increased the need to identify and formalize shared responsibilities between primary and secondary care for patients with chronic conditions. There are well-established schemes for the management of patients with some chronic diseases but very little for other high-dependency groups. This review examines the extent of systematic and shared care for some of the less well served groups: these are mental illness, neurological disorders and terminal care. Examples of good practice are highlighted.

The Nordic comparative study on sectorized psychiatry. Utilization of psychiatric hospital care related to amount and allocation of resources to psychiatric services

As a part of a Nordic comparative study on sectorized psychiatry, utilization of inpatient care was related to resources and dynamic qualities of psychiatric services in seven catchment areas in four Nordic countries. One-year treated incidence cohorts were used. Each patient was followed for 1 year after first contact with the psychiatric service. Data were collected concerning number of beds and staff, number of long-term patients and turnover rate of patients in inpatient care. Findings gave some support to the earlier reports that the utilization of inpatient care is determined by the supply of available beds. Highly staffed community services did not themselves reduce the use of inpatient services, but availability of day care services seemed to reduce utilization of inpatient care among psychotic patients.

The cost of comprehensive care of people with schizophrenia living in the community. A cost evaluation from a German catchment area

BACKGROUND

In community mental health care, knowledge about costs of care is very limited. Only few studies have related costs to outcome measures.

METHOD

This German study assesses the cost of psychiatric care of 66 schizophrenic patients during one year of living in the community. Predictors of high cost were identified.

RESULTS

The average cost of comprehensive community care of one patient of the cohort was US$ 363 per week. This was only 43% of the cost of constant long-term care in a psychiatric hospital. Significant predictors of total cost of community care were the number of rehabilitative problems at the beginning and at the end of the study period, the type of accommodation before index hospitalisation and the gender of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Results must be understood in terms of the characteristics of the special patient group and the catchment area we studied and are of high relevance in planning future care.