Rational pharmacotherapy in early psychosis

Macroscale EEG characteristics in antipsychotic-naïve patients with first-episode psychosis and healthy controls

Electroencephalography in patients with a first episode of psychosis (FEP) may contribute to the diagnosis and treatment response prediction. Findings in the literature vary due to small sample sizes, medication effects, and variable illness duration. We studied macroscale resting-state EEG characteristics of antipsychotic naïve patients with FEP. We tested (1) for differences between FEP patients and controls, (2) if EEG could be used to classify patients as FEP, and (3) if EEG could be used to predict treatment response to antipsychotic medication. In total, we studied EEG recordings of 62 antipsychotic-naïve patients with FEP and 106 healthy controls. Spectral power, phase-based and amplitude-based functional connectivity, and macroscale network characteristics were analyzed, resulting in 60 EEG variables across four frequency bands. Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) were assessed at baseline and 4-6 weeks follow-up after treatment with amisulpride or aripiprazole. Mann-Whitney U tests, a random forest (RF) classifier and RF regression were used for statistical analysis. Our study found that at baseline, FEP patients did not differ from controls in any of the EEG characteristics. A random forest classifier showed chance-level discrimination between patients and controls. The random forest regression explained 23% variance in positive symptom reduction after treatment in the patient group. In conclusion, in this largest antipsychotic- naïve EEG sample to date in FEP patients, we found no differences in macroscale EEG characteristics between patients with FEP and healthy controls. However, these EEG characteristics did show predictive value for positive symptom reduction following treatment with antipsychotic medication.

Pharmacologic treatment of first-episode schizophrenia: a review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

To review the evidence base for the efficacy and tolerability of antipsychotic medication for the treatment of the first episode of schizophrenia.

DATA SOURCE

MEDLINE databases were searched for published articles in English over the last 25 years, from January 1986 to January 2011, on choice of antipsychotic treatment for the first episode of schizophrenia, with an emphasis on efficacy and tolerability of antipsychotic drugs in the acute phase of psychotic illness.

STUDY SELECTION

The keywords antipsychotic drugs and schizophrenia were used in combination with drug treatment, pharmacologic treatment, efficacy, and tolerability in addition to atypical antipsychotics, first-generation antipsychotics, second-generation antipsychotics, first-episode psychosis, and acute psychotic episode.

DATA SYNTHESIS

At present, there is no convincing evidence to guide clinicians in choosing a single first-line antipsychotic that is effective in treating the positive and negative symptoms of the first episode of schizophrenia. Even though second-generation antipsychotic drugs offer potential benefits in terms of less extrapyramidal side effects and some benefits in treating negative, affective, and cognitive symptoms, these drugs are not without their own side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

With the introduction of a number of second-generation antipsychotic drugs there have been significant advances in antipsychotic drug treatment over the last decade. Despite these advances, there are still a number of limitations in continued use of some antipsychotic medications due to their efficacy and tolerability issues in the acute and early maintenance phases of psychosis. Active research in this area would provide more promising results of improved efficacy and tolerability of antipsychotic medication.

Perceptions of relapse risks following first-episode psychosis and attitudes towards maintenance medication: a comparison between nursing and social work professionals

AIM

Existing clinical guidelines have not yet identified an optimal duration of maintenance antipsychotic drug treatment for stable, remitted first-episode psychosis patients. This study compares the perception of relapse risk and attitudes towards maintenance medication among professionals in nursing and social work fields who have direct clinical experience with first-episode psychosis patients. We explore a perception model that identifies the decision-making factors in the clinical dilemma between relapse and maintenance.

METHODS

A specially designed survey addressing perceptions of relapse risk and optimal duration of maintenance treatment was conducted among 63 experienced health-care professionals (30 nurses and 33 social workers) in the field of early psychosis in Hong Kong.

RESULTS

Two clinically relevant themes were identified that affected professionals' judgment on the optimal duration of maintenance treatment in stable, remitted first-episode psychosis patients: (i) the remission period; and (ii) professionals' perceptions of relapse risk involved in medication discontinuation. The remission period was a significant predictor of the perceived relapse risk. Compared with social workers, mental health nurses perceived a higher relapse risk for patients before Bonferroni adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

The three key clinical components discussed--remission period, perceived relapse risk and perceived optimal duration of maintenance treatment--are interconnected, collectively influencing health-care professionals' attitudes towards relapse and maintenance for patients. Our study identified differences between the perceptions of nursing and social work professionals, indicating a need for communication and discussion among professional groups in order to arrive at a coherent, efficacious team consensus.

To medicate or not to medicate, when diagnosis is in question: decision-making in first episode psychosis

OBJECTIVE

This paper reports on a brief survey of clinicians' judgements when making treatment decisions in the context of diagnostic uncertainty. Specifically, attitudes and opinions were sought from practising consultant psychiatrists regarding two key areas of clinical decision-making in first episode psychosis (FEP), namely, when to initiate medication and, how long to continue treatment.

METHOD

Interviews were conducted with consultant psychiatrists using a combination of structured and semi-structured questions that examined and explored pharmacological treatment decisions in FEP.

RESULTS

Twenty-three consultant psychiatrists participated in the interviews. The threshold to initiate pharmacological treatment was lower when a risk to self or others is present, when symptoms are primarily positive, when the patient is in distress, or where there is a family history of mental illness. Atypical antipsychotics are routinely used as front-line medication in FEP and the choice of medication is determined largely by their likely side effect profile. However, the greater the perceived efficacy, the greater the anticipated tolerability burden. The ideal duration of treatment is considered to be 1-2 years in instances of full remission, and 5 years where only a partial response has been achieved or where recovery has not been sustained.

CONCLUSIONS

The 'first episode' represents a unique period in the management of psychosis where by definition there is no history of pattern of illness, diagnostic certainty is rare, and the patient usually does not have any prior exposure to medications. Therefore, each management decision needs to be considered following a risk benefit analysis which takes into account the context of the individual.

Early intervention in psychotic disorders: faith before facts?

This paper reviews the literature on early intervention in psychotic disorders, weighs the cons of this approach, and makes suggestions for clinicians and researchers regarding how to interpret and respond to what is still an embryonic evidence-base, notably in terms of any long-term benefits.

Antipsychotic treatment discontinuation in previously untreated patients with schizophrenia: 36-month results from the SOHO study

Data from the 3-year, prospective, observational SOHO study were used to compare the effectiveness (in terms of treatment discontinuation) and the tolerability of olanzapine, risperidone, other atypicals and typical antipsychotics in 1009 previously untreated outpatients with schizophrenia who started monotherapy at baseline. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis estimated the time to treatment discontinuation by the treatment group, Cox proportional hazards regression models identified the variables associated with treatment discontinuation (adjusted for baseline differences between treatment groups), and logistic regression models compared the tolerability profiles of the different treatment groups. Of the 931 patients analyzed, 31.9% discontinued the medication initiated at baseline during the 3-year follow-up. Olanzapine had the lowest rate of discontinuation (28.9%), followed by other atypical (34.0%), risperidone (36.2%) and typical antipsychotics (44.5%). Compared to olanzapine, risk of treatment discontinuation was higher with typical antipsychotics (hazard ratio [HR] 1.75; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11, 2.78) or risperidone (HR 1.36; 95% CI 1.02, 1.82). A higher baseline Clinical Global Impression (CGI) positive score was associated with a higher risk of treatment discontinuation (HR 1.18; 95% CI 1.06, 1.30). Olanzapine was associated with a lower frequency of extrapyramidal symptoms than other antipsychotics, fewer prolactin-related adverse events than risperidone and other atypical antipsychotics, but greater weight gain than typicals and risperidone. For all analyses, comparison with the other atypical group is limited due to its small sample size (n=50). In conclusion, treatment effectiveness and tolerability varied among antipsychotic medications in previously untreated patients with schizophrenia. The results should be interpreted conservatively given the observational study design.

Real-world use of quetiapine in early psychosis: An acute inpatient and community follow-up effectiveness study

Objective. To evaluate the use of quetiapine in first episode psychosis in adolescents and adults in a 26-week open-label trial. Methods. Consenting patients were recruited from consecutive acute psychiatric admissions. Quetiapine was increased stepwise to 750 mg. Baseline, 2, 4, 12, 16, 20 and 26 week measurement included: BPRS, PANSS, CGI, and indices of tolerability and safety. Change was assessed using repeated measures ANOVA. Results. Of 73 first admission patients with psychosis, 15 entered the study. Loss of otherwise eligible patients was mainly related to prospective consent, which appeared to cause selection bias. All 15 patients were retained for 4-week Intention-to-Treat Analysis; nine completed the 26-week protocol (Completers Analysis). Non-completers dropped out shortly after 4 weeks. In the ITT Analysis, there was significant improvement on BPRS Total (P<0.01), PANSS Positive (P<0.05), and CGI (P<0.01) scores. No change in the 2-week BPRS Total score predicted subsequent non-response to quetiapine. In the Completers Analysis, onset of significant PANSS Negative score reduction did not occur until week 12. By 26 weeks all efficacy measures had substantially improved; and substance abuse was markedly less prevalent (P=0.02). Adverse events included postural hypotension, drowsiness, and significant weight gain (P=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This uncontrolled trial suggests quetiapine is an effective first-line treatment in young early psychosis patients. Prospective consent is a major barrier to evaluating acute care for psychotic disorder.

Antipsychotic use in a first episode psychosis program

Objective. To conduct a naturalistic, longitudinal study of prescribing patterns of atypical neuroleptics in predominantly drug-naïve first episode non-affective psychosis patients. Methods. Patients with a first episode psychosis were prescribed an antipsychotic as part of a clinical protocol and followed-up for 2 years. Comparisons were made between risperidone and olanzapine, the two most commonly prescribed antipsychotics. Socio-demographic variables and clinical characteristics such as diagnosis, duration of untreated illness and psychosis and level of positive and negative symptoms were assessed using well-established methods. We examined the first antipsychotic given, starting dose, time taken to start and to reach the maximum dose, time on first medication, maximum dose, medication change and concomitant medication use. Results. One hundred and ninety-three consecutive patients consented to start on antipsychotic. The results are provided for risperidone (N = 133) and olanzapine (N=38). The time to initiate antipsychotic medications was significantly longer for outpatients than inpatients. There were no differences between the two groups for time taken to reach the maximum dose, drop out rates or concomitant medication use. The percentage of patients taking an antipsychotic agent at any given time was high (range 79-91%), but half of the patients had changed from their first antipsychotic by 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The reality of clinical practice can be much different than rigid protocols or treatment algorithms of pre-marketing studies or clinical trials. In this sample of first episode psychosis patients, although the majority of patients remained on an antipsychotic, changes in medication over the first 2 years were common. Polypharmacy was not a common practice.