Crome P, Malham A, Baker D, Smith AE, Bloor R. Domiciliary visits to the old and the mentally ill: how valuable?
J R Soc Med 2000;
93:187-90. [PMID:
10844884 PMCID:
PMC1297975 DOI:
10.1177/014107680009300408]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
In the early days of the British National Health Service, domiciliary visits were a continuation of the tradition whereby general practitioners (GPs) met consultants in the patient's home. The nature of domiciliary visits, which still attract a special fee, has since changed. We analysed the effectiveness of all domiciliary visits undertaken in a NHS trust providing primary care, mental health and elderly care services to a population of 470,000. Data were obtained from domiciliary visit claim forms and from questionnaires completed by the consultant, the referring GP and consultant peer reviewers. The largest number of visits (total 234) was in geriatric medicine 48.9%, followed by old-age psychiatry 44.9%. Geriatric medicine was more likely than psychiatry to admit patients to hospital (19%) after a visit. All domiciliary visits in old-age psychiatry were done during the day (9 am to 5 pm). Only 2% of GPs stated that they attended any of the domiciliary visits; almost all thought that the outcome of domiciliary visits was of value. Old-age-psychiatry peer reviewers believed that all visits in that specialty were appropriate; in geriatric medicine this figure was 77% and in other psychiatric specialties 65%. The findings indicate that domiciliary visits were not being used routinely as a pathway to hospital admission, though they were often used to expedite admission or gain a quick consultant opinion; the visits were valued by GPs. The practice of domiciliary visits differs greatly from the definition in NHS terms and conditions of service. One or other should be altered.
Collapse