Electrocardiogram interpretation skills in psychiatry trainees

What training should psychiatrists have to interpret six- and 12-lead electrocardiograms?

To monitor for drug-related cardiac arrhythmias, psychiatrists regularly perform and interpret 12-lead (12L) and, increasingly often, six-lead (6L) electrocardiograms (ECGs). It is not known how training on this complex skill is updated or how well psychiatrists can interpret relevant arrhythmias on either device.We conducted an online survey and ECG interpretation test of cardiac rhythms relevant to psychiatrists.A total of 183 prescribers took part; 75% did not regularly update their ECG interpretation skills, and only 22% felt confident in interpreting ECGs. Most participants were able to recognise normal ECGs. For both 6L and 12L ECGs, the majority of participants were able to recognise abnormal ECGs, but fewer than 50% were able to correctly identify relevant arrhythmias (complete heart block and long QTc). A small number prescribed in the presence of potentially fatal arrhythmias. These findings suggest a need for mandatory ECG interpretation training to improve safe prescribing practice.

Physician Training for Electrocardiogram Interpretation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Using electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation as an example of a widely taught diagnostic skill, the authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to demonstrate how research evidence on instruction in diagnosis can be synthesized to facilitate improvement of educational activities (instructional modalities, instructional methods, and interpretation approaches), guide the content and specificity of such activities, and provide direction for research.

METHOD

The authors searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, PsycInfo, CINAHL, ERIC, and Web of Science databases through February 21, 2020, for empirical investigations of ECG interpretation training enrolling medical students, residents, or practicing physicians. They appraised study quality with the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument and pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) using random effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Of 1,002 articles identified, 59 were included (enrolling 17,251 participants). Among 10 studies comparing instructional modalities, 8 compared computer-assisted and face-to-face instruction, with pooled SMD 0.23 (95% CI, 0.09, 0.36) indicating a small, statistically significant difference favoring computer-assisted instruction. Among 19 studies comparing instructional methods, 5 evaluated individual versus group training (pooled SMD -0.35 favoring group study [95% CI, -0.06, -0.63]), 4 evaluated peer-led versus faculty-led instruction (pooled SMD 0.38 favoring peer instruction [95% CI, 0.01, 0.74]), and 4 evaluated contrasting ECG features (e.g., QRS width) from 2 or more diagnostic categories versus routine examination of features within a single ECG or diagnosis (pooled SMD 0.23 not significantly favoring contrasting features [95% CI, -0.30, 0.76]). Eight studies compared ECG interpretation approaches, with pooled SMD 0.92 (95% CI, 0.48, 1.37) indicating a large, statistically significant effect favoring more systematic interpretation approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

Some instructional interventions appear to improve learning in ECG interpretation; however, many evidence-based instructional strategies are insufficiently investigated. The findings may have implications for future research and design of training to improve skills in ECG interpretation and other types of visual diagnosis.

Assessments of Physicians' Electrocardiogram Interpretation Skill: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To identify features of instruments, test procedures, study design, and validity evidence in published studies of electrocardiogram (ECG) skill assessments.

METHOD

The authors conducted a systematic review, searching MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ERIC, and Web of Science databases in February 2020 for studies that assessed the ECG interpretation skill of physicians or medical students. Two authors independently screened articles for inclusion and extracted information on test features, study design, risk of bias, and validity evidence.

RESULTS

The authors found 85 eligible studies. Participants included medical students (42 studies), postgraduate physicians (48 studies), and practicing physicians (13 studies). ECG selection criteria were infrequently reported: 25 studies (29%) selected single-diagnosis or straightforward ECGs; 5 (6%) selected complex cases. ECGs were selected by generalists (15 studies [18%]), cardiologists (10 studies [12%]), or unspecified experts (4 studies [5%]). The median number of ECGs per test was 10. The scoring rubric was defined by 2 or more experts in 32 studies (38%), by 1 expert in 5 (6%), and using clinical data in 5 (6%). Scoring was performed by a human rater in 34 studies (40%) and by computer in 7 (8%). Study methods were appraised as low risk of selection bias in 16 studies (19%), participant flow bias in 59 (69%), instrument conduct and scoring bias in 20 (24%), and applicability problems in 56 (66%). Evidence of test score validity was reported infrequently, namely evidence of content (39 studies [46%]), internal structure (11 [13%]), relations with other variables (10 [12%]), response process (2 [2%]), and consequences (3 [4%]).

CONCLUSIONS

ECG interpretation skill assessments consist of idiosyncratic instruments that are too short, composed of items of obscure provenance, with incompletely specified answers, graded by individuals with underreported credentials, yielding scores with limited interpretability. The authors suggest several best practices.

Brugada syndrome: should we be screening patients before prescribing psychotropic medication?

Brugada syndrome (BrS) presents with a characteristic electrocardiogram (ECG) and is associated with sudden cardiac death. Until now, prolongation of QTc interval and its association with Torsade de Pointe and possible fatal arrhythmia have been the focus of routine baseline ECGs before prescribing psychotropic medication. A semi-systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed. The terms 'Brugada', 'Brugada Syndrome' AND 'psychotropic' 'antipsychotic' 'antidepressant' 'mood stabilisers' 'clozapine' 'Tricyclic Antidepressants' 'Lithium' were searched. From a search that delivered over 200 articles, 82 articles were included. Those that included details around causative medication, doses of medication and where clear timeline on drug cause were included. Where clarification was needed, the manufacturer of the medication was contacted directly. Psychotropic medication can be associated with BrS, Brugada phenocopy or unmasking of BrS, in overdose or in normal doses. Our results include a table summarising a number of psychotropic overdoses that led to BrS unmasking. Routine screening for BrS in patients before prescribing psychotropic medication is a natural extension of the baseline ECG currently routinely done to rule out QTc prolongation. Psychiatrists need to invest in ensuring better skills in interpreting ECGs and work closer with cardiologists in interpreting ECGs.

Accuracy of Physicians' Electrocardiogram Interpretations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

The electrocardiogram (ECG) is the most common cardiovascular diagnostic test. Physicians' skill in ECG interpretation is incompletely understood.

OBJECTIVES

To identify and summarize published research on the accuracy of physicians' ECG interpretations.

DATA SOURCES

A search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL (Central Register of Controlled Trials), PsycINFO, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health), ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), and Web of Science was conducted for articles published from database inception to February 21, 2020.

STUDY SELECTION

Of 1138 articles initially identified, 78 studies that assessed the accuracy of physicians' or medical students' ECG interpretations in a test setting were selected.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data on study purpose, participants, assessment features, and outcomes were abstracted, and methodological quality was appraised with the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument. Results were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Accuracy of ECG interpretation.

RESULTS

Of 1138 studies initially identified, 78 assessed the accuracy of ECG interpretation. Across all training levels, the median accuracy was 54% (interquartile range [IQR], 40%-66%; n = 62 studies) on pretraining assessments and 67% (IQR, 55%-77%; n = 47 studies) on posttraining assessments. Accuracy varied widely across studies. The pooled accuracy for pretraining assessments was 42.0% (95% CI, 34.3%-49.6%; n = 24 studies; I2 = 99%) for medical students, 55.8% (95% CI, 48.1%-63.6%; n = 37 studies; I2 = 96%) for residents, 68.5% (95% CI, 57.6%-79.5%; n = 10 studies; I2 = 86%) for practicing physicians, and 74.9% (95% CI, 63.2%-86.7%; n = 8 studies; I2 = 22%) for cardiologists.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Physicians at all training levels had deficiencies in ECG interpretation, even after educational interventions. Improved education across the practice continuum appears warranted. Wide variation in outcomes could reflect real differences in training or skill or differences in assessment design.