The role of ethnicity in psychopharmacology

Second-Generation Parenteral Antipsychotic (Olanzapine) as a First-Line Treatment for Acute Undifferentiated Agitation in the Emergency Department in Comparison With Haloperidol

Background Acutely agitated patients are common in the emergency department (ED). Given the myriad aetiologies of the clinical conditions that can produce agitation, such a high prevalence is unsurprising. Agitation is a symptomatic presentation, not a diagnosis, secondary to a psychiatric, medical, traumatic, or toxicological condition. Most literature on the emergency management of agitated patients is from psychiatric populations, not generalised to EDs. Benzodiazepines, antipsychotics, and ketamine have been used to treat acute agitation. However, a clear consensus is lacking. Objectives The objectives are to study the effectiveness of intramuscular (IM) olanzapine as a first-line treatment for rapid tranquillisation in undifferentiated acute agitation in the ED and compare the effectiveness of sedatives to control agitation in etiologically divided groups per the following preassigned protocols: Group A: Alcohol/drug intoxication (olanzapine vs haloperidol), Group B: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) with or without alcohol intoxication (olanzapine vs haloperidol), Group C: Psychiatric conditions (olanzapine vs haloperidol and lorazepam), and Group D: Agitated delirium, organic causes (olanzapine vs haloperidol). Methods This 18-month prospective study included acutely agitated ED patients between 18 and 65. Results A total of 87 patients between 19 and 65 were included, all with a Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) score between +2 and +4 at presentation. Nineteen of the 87 patients were managed as acute undifferentiated agitation, and 68 were assigned to one of the four groups. In acute undifferentiated agitation, IM olanzapine 10 mg effectively sedated 15 (78.9%) patients within 20 minutes, whereas the remaining four (21.1%) were sedated with a repeat IM olanzapine 10 mg over the next 25 minutes. In 13 patients with agitation due to alcohol intoxication, zero out of three with olanzapine and four out of 10 (40%) with IM haloperidol 5 mg were sedated within 20 minutes. In patients with TBI, two out of eight (25%) receiving olanzapine and four out of nine (44.4%) receiving haloperidol were sedated within 20 minutes. In acute agitation secondary to psychiatric disease, olanzapine sedated nine out of 10 (90%), and haloperidol with lorazepam sedated 16 out of 17 (94.1%) within 20 minutes. In patients with agitation secondary to organic medical conditions, olanzapine rapidly sedated 19 out of 24 (79.1%), whereas haloperidol sedated one out of four (25%). Interpretation and conclusion IM olanzapine 10 mg is effective for rapid sedation in acute undifferentiated agitation. Olanzapine is superior to haloperidol in agitation secondary to organic medical conditions and is as efficacious as haloperidol with lorazepam in agitation due to psychiatric diseases. However, in agitation due to alcohol intoxication and TBI, haloperidol 5 mg is slightly better, although not statistically significant. Olanzapine and haloperidol were well tolerated by Indian patients in the current study, with minimal side effects.

Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia: a 10-year retrospective study in a Korean tertiary hospital

Extensive research has been carried out on the comparative effectiveness of antipsychotic medications. Most studies, however, have been performed in Western countries. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness, indicated by time to any-cause discontinuation, of antipsychotic drugs in a large number of patients with schizophrenia in South Korea. We identified 1458 patients with schizophrenia or schizophreniform disorder who were treated with antipsychotic medications using a clinical data warehouse at the Seoul National University Hospital between March 2005 and February 2014. Kaplan–Meier survival analyses were used to estimate the time to discontinuation of antipsychotic drugs. We compared the survival curves of different antipsychotics using log-rank tests. Overall, the median time to discontinuation for any cause was 133 days (95% CI, 126–147). The longest time to discontinuation was observed for clozapine, followed by aripiprazole, paliperidone, olanzapine, amisulpride, risperidone, quetiapine, ziprasidone, and haloperidol. Specifically, clozapine was significantly different from all other antipsychotic drugs (all p < 0.001). Aripiprazole also had a significantly longer time to discontinuation than amisulpride (p = 0.001), risperidone (p < 0.001), quetiapine (p < 0.001), ziprasidone (p < 0.001), and haloperidol (p < 0.001). In Asian patients with schizophrenia, clozapine was the most effective antipsychotic in terms of time to discontinuation, followed by aripiprazole. This study extends the findings of previous effectiveness studies from Western populations and suggests the need to develop guidelines for the pharmacotherapy of schizophrenia tailored to Asian individuals.

Major depressive disorder in the African American population

Depression is a common mental disorder that presents with depressed mood. It can become chronic or recurrent and lead to substantial impairment in an individual's ability to function. At this level, it is identified as major depressive disorder (MDD). Depression and MDD occur across all racial and ethnic groups. Although many depressed patients are treated in primary care, depression in these settings has been underdetected and undertreated. African Americans, especially, who suffer from depression are frequently underdiagnosed and inadequately managed in primary care due to patient, physician, and treatment setting factors. Patient factors include being poor, uninsured, restrictive insurance policies, biological-genetic vulnerability, nonresponsiveness to traditional pharmacological interventions, and stigma (i.e., attitudes and perceptions of mental illness). Physician factors include diagnosis and assessment, physician characteristics, physician bias, and culture; and treatment setting factors include systemic variables such as lack of or poor access to health care, racism, environment, and patient management. African Americans are less likely to receive proper diagnosis and treatment, more likely to have depression for long periods of time, and more likely to suffer greater disability from depression. Understanding patient, physician, and treatment setting factors as contributing barriers that impede effective diagnosis and treatment of depression and MDD in African Americans is critical to effective patient management and discovery. Greater African American participation in clinical research trials also is needed to effectively improve, diagnose, and treat depression in African Americans. This article examines depression among African Americans in the context of gender, culture, and psychosocial determinants, and their engagement in clinical trials.