Inhibitory Effect of Formalin Administration on Immobilization-Induced Epinephrine Release

Catecholaminergic systems in stress: structural and molecular genetic approaches

Stressful stimuli evoke complex endocrine, autonomic, and behavioral responses that are extremely variable and specific depending on the type and nature of the stressors. We first provide a short overview of physiology, biochemistry, and molecular genetics of sympatho-adrenomedullary, sympatho-neural, and brain catecholaminergic systems. Important processes of catecholamine biosynthesis, storage, release, secretion, uptake, reuptake, degradation, and transporters in acutely or chronically stressed organisms are described. We emphasize the structural variability of catecholamine systems and the molecular genetics of enzymes involved in biosynthesis and degradation of catecholamines and transporters. Characterization of enzyme gene promoters, transcriptional and posttranscriptional mechanisms, transcription factors, gene expression and protein translation, as well as different phases of stress-activated transcription and quantitative determination of mRNA levels in stressed organisms are discussed. Data from catecholamine enzyme gene knockout mice are shown. Interaction of catecholaminergic systems with other neurotransmitter and hormonal systems are discussed. We describe the effects of homotypic and heterotypic stressors, adaptation and maladaptation of the organism, and the specificity of stressors (physical, emotional, metabolic, etc.) on activation of catecholaminergic systems at all levels from plasma catecholamines to gene expression of catecholamine enzymes. We also discuss cross-adaptation and the effect of novel heterotypic stressors on organisms adapted to long-term monotypic stressors. The extra-adrenal nonneuronal adrenergic system is described. Stress-related central neuronal regulatory circuits and central organization of responses to various stressors are presented with selected examples of regulatory molecular mechanisms. Data summarized here indicate that catecholaminergic systems are activated in different ways following exposure to distinct stressful stimuli.

The response of plasma catecholamines in rats simultaneously exposed to immobilization and painful stimuli

Immobilization represents a strong stressor inducing a profound increase in plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine levels. We have previously demonstrated that a subcutaneous injection of formalin (0.2 mL of 4% solution/100 g bw) attenuated the immobilization-induced elevation of plasma epinephrine levels in rats. In the present study, we investigated whether other painful and stressful stimuli, such as capsaicin, hydrochloric acid, mechanical pressure, heat, and cold, might also attenuate the increase of plasma epinephrine in rats exposed to acute immobilization stress. With the exception of formalin, all of the painful stimuli applied failed to attenuate the increase of plasma epinephrine levels in immobilized animals. Our data suggest that the attenuation of an immobilization-induced increase in plasma epinephrine levels is specific for subcutaneous formalin administration.

Prolactin response to formalin is related to the acute nociceptive response and it is attenuated by combined application of different stressors

Subcutaneous injection of diluted formalin (0.2 ml of 4% solution/100 g BW) can influence the increase of plasma epinephrine levels in rats exposed to exteroceptive (handling, immobilization), as well as to interoceptive stressors (insulin-induced hypoglycemia), without having any effect on norepinephrine release. In the present studies, the effect of the above-mentioned stressors has been investigated on formalin-induced prolactin (PRL) and corticosterone secretion. Administrations of formalin via chronically implanted subcutaneous cannula into the hind limb without handling induce an immediate increase in both plasma PRL and corticosterone levels. While PRL concentration reaches its peak value within 5 min then returns to the basal level by the end of the 30th min, corticosterone level also starts to rise immediately after formalin administration reaching its highest concentration within 15-30 min, but it remains at this high level during the next 60 min, then it declines and returns to the pre-injection level. Application of formalin to animals exposed to different heterotypic stressors (like handling or insulin-induced hypoglycemia) produces an attenuated PRL response, while plasma corticosterone levels induced by the same nociceptive component remained unchanged. Combinations of formalin injection with immobilization also show an attenuated PRL response. The present data indicate that plasma PRL response to formalin is related to its acute nociceptive phase, and application of different stressors prior to formalin injection significantly attenuate plasma PRL levels, while it does not influence corticosterone responses.

Formalin attenuates the stress-induced increase in plasma epinephrine levels

Subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of formalin into rats is frequently used as a painful stressor that produces a three-phase nociceptive response. We have shown previously that s.c. administered formalin (0.2 ml of 4% solution per 100 g body weight) unexpectedly attenuated the increase of plasma epinephrine levels in rats exposed to exteroceptive stressors (handling, immobilisation). To clarify the mechanism(s) responsible for this phenomenon, the effect of formalin applications on epinephrine plasma levels was investigated in various experimental conditions. Subcutaneous application of formalin combined with exposures of animals to an interoceptive stressor, insulin-induced hypoglycaemia, significantly attenuated the stress-induced increase in plasma epinephrine levels, whereas plasma norepinephrine levels remained highly elevated. Moreover, administration of formalin to unstressed animals also manifested signs of an attenuated epinephrine secretion. Interestingly, intraperitoneal administration of formalin did not reduce the elevated levels of plasma epinephrine. We suggest that formalin attenuates epinephrine secretion from the adrenal medulla most probably via irritation of s.c. somatosensory receptors. We hypothesise that the irritation of the primary sensory afferents fibres might reduce the activity of the sympathetic preganglionic neurones innervating adrenal medullary chromaffin cells. Further investigations are required to establish whether the observed reduction of epinephrine secretion from the adrenal medulla is controlled by either spinal or supraspinal neuronal circuits.