Treatment and Clinical Research in Myasthenia Gravis

Comparative effectiveness clinical trials to advance treatment of myasthenia gravis

Myasthenia gravis (MG) presents many challenges for establishing treatment efficacy through clinical trials. Among these are the rarity and heterogeneity of the disease, spontaneous fluctuations, prolonged latency to effect for many immunosuppressive drugs, and the uncertain generalizability of results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Prospective observational study designs may overcome some of these limitations, but attention is required to ensure that internal validity is not compromised. Observational comparative effectiveness research (CER) utilizes data obtained during routine clinical care to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions in real-life practice conditions, thereby improving generalizability to the clinic. Compared with RCTs, observational CER studies may be less resource intensive and costly. Recent advances that have improved the feasibility of CER studies for MG are (1) the development of MG common data elements, (2) the publication of international consensus guidance for MG treatment, and (3) the development of a web-based REDCap database that can be shared and adapted to standardize data collection. This infrastructure could be used for multisite comparisons of commonly used therapies and provides longitudinal information on patient- and clinician-centered MG outcome measures. A challenge is to design studies that address the potential limitations of observational trials, such as confounding and selection and information bias.

Glucocorticoids in myasthenia gravis - if, when, how, and how much?

Glucocorticoids (GC) are the most commonly used immune-directed therapy in myasthenia gravis (MG). However, to date, GC have not proven their effectiveness in the setting of a randomized clinical trial that complies with currently accepted standards. The rationale for the use of GC in MG is the autoimmune nature of the disease, which is supported by consistent positive results from retrospective studies. Well-defined recommendations for treatment of MG with GC are lacking and further hampered by inter- and intra-individual differences in the disease course and responses to GC treatment. Uncertainties concerning GC treatment in MG encompass the indication for treatment initiation, exact dosage, dose adjustment in specific conditions (e.g., pregnancy, thymectomy), mode of tapering, and surveillance of adverse events (AE). This review illustrates the mode of action of GC in the treatment for MG, presents the currently available data on GC treatment in MG, and attempts to translate the currently available information into clinical recommendations.

Diagnosis and therapy of myasthenia gravis with antibodies to muscle-specific kinase

Myasthenia gravis (MG) with antibodies to the muscle-specific receptor tyrosine kinase (MuSK-MG) is a rare disease which covers 5-8% of all MG patients. Symptoms are nearly always generalized, though more focal than in MG with anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies, with predominant involvement of cranial, bulbar and axial muscles; early respiratory crises are frequent. Focal atrophy, mostly of facial, masseter and tongue muscles, occurs in a proportion of patients. Diagnosis is often challenging on account of atypical presentation with little or no symptom fluctuations, lack of response to acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in a high proportion of patients and negative results of electrodiagnostic studies when performed on limb muscles. Immunosuppression is the mainstay of treatment, since the response to acetylcholinesterase inhibitors is generally unsatisfactory and thymectomy does not appear to improve the course of the disease. Although corticosteroids result in marked improvement, disease flares are frequent during prednisone dosage tapering and most patients remain dependent on treatment. Since treatment with rituximab, in uncontrolled studies, induced sustained benefit in patients with refractory disease, B cell depletion is an attractive option for MuSK-MG patients unresponsive to conventional immunosuppressants.