1
|
Coles CE, Earl H, Anderson BO, Barrios CH, Bienz M, Bliss JM, Cameron DA, Cardoso F, Cui W, Francis PA, Jagsi R, Knaul FM, McIntosh SA, Phillips KA, Radbruch L, Thompson MK, André F, Abraham JE, Bhattacharya IS, Franzoi MA, Drewett L, Fulton A, Kazmi F, Inbah Rajah D, Mutebi M, Ng D, Ng S, Olopade OI, Rosa WE, Rubasingham J, Spence D, Stobart H, Vargas Enciso V, Vaz-Luis I, Villarreal-Garza C. The Lancet Breast Cancer Commission. Lancet 2024; 403:1895-1950. [PMID: 38636533 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(24)00747-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Helena Earl
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Benjamin O Anderson
- Global Breast Cancer Initiative, World Health Organisation and Departments of Surgery and Global Health Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Carlos H Barrios
- Oncology Research Center, Hospital São Lucas, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Maya Bienz
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, London, UK; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - David A Cameron
- Institute of Genetics and Cancer and Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Fatima Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Wanda Cui
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Prudence A Francis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Reshma Jagsi
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Felicia Marie Knaul
- Institute for Advanced Study of the Americas, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA; Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA; Tómatelo a Pecho, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Stuart A McIntosh
- School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Kelly-Anne Phillips
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Lukas Radbruch
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | | | - Jean E Abraham
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | - Lynsey Drewett
- Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | | | - Farasat Kazmi
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| | | | | | - Dianna Ng
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Szeyi Ng
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - William E Rosa
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Cynthia Villarreal-Garza
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion TecSalud, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Corbaux P, Bayle A, Besle S, Vinceneux A, Vanacker H, Ouali K, Hanvic B, Baldini C, Cassier PA, Terret C, Verlingue L. Patients' selection and trial matching in early-phase oncology clinical trials. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 196:104307. [PMID: 38401694 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Revised: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 02/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early-phase clinical trials (EPCT) represent an important part of innovations in medical oncology and a valuable therapeutic option for patients with metastatic cancers, particularly in the era of precision medicine. Nevertheless, adult patients' participation in oncology clinical trials is low, ranging from 2% to 8% worldwide, with unequal access, and up to 40% risk of early discontinuation in EPCT, mostly due to cancer-related complications. DESIGN We review the tools and initiatives to increase patients' orientation and access to early phase cancer clinical trials, and to limit early discontinuation. RESULTS New approaches to optimize the early-phase clinical trial referring process in oncology include automatic trial matching, tools to facilitate the estimation of patients' prognostic and/or to better predict patients' eligibility to clinical trials. Classical and innovative approaches should be associated to double patient recruitment, improve clinical trial enrollment experience and reduce early discontinuation rates. CONCLUSIONS Whereas EPCT are essential for patients to access the latest medical innovations in oncology, offering the appropriate trial when it is relevant for patients should increase by organizational and technological innovations. The oncologic community will need to closely monitor their performance, portability and simplicity for implementation in daily clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Corbaux
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie et d'Hématologie Universitaire de Saint-Étienne (ICHUSE), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Etienne, France
| | - A Bayle
- Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif F-94805, France
| | - S Besle
- Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon (CRCL), France
| | - A Vinceneux
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - H Vanacker
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon (CRCL), France
| | - K Ouali
- Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif F-94805, France
| | - B Hanvic
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - C Baldini
- Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif F-94805, France
| | - P A Cassier
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon (CRCL), France
| | - C Terret
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - L Verlingue
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon (CRCL), France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Franzoi MA, Gillanders E, Vaz-Luis I. Unlocking digitally enabled research in oncology: the time is now. ESMO Open 2023; 8:101633. [PMID: 37660408 PMCID: PMC10482746 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- M A Franzoi
- Cancer Survivorship Group, Inserm Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif
| | - E Gillanders
- Cancer Survivorship Group, Inserm Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif
| | - I Vaz-Luis
- Cancer Survivorship Group, Inserm Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Department for the Organization of Patient Pathways, DIOPP, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kempf E, Vaterkowski M, Leprovost D, Griffon N, Ouagne D, Breant S, Serre P, Mouchet A, Rance B, Chatellier G, Bellamine A, Frank M, Guerin J, Tannier X, Livartowski A, Hilka M, Daniel C. How to Improve Cancer Patients ENrollment in Clinical Trials From rEal-Life Databases Using the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Oncology Extension: Results of the PENELOPE Initiative in Urologic Cancers. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2023; 7:e2200179. [PMID: 37167578 DOI: 10.1200/cci.22.00179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/13/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the computability of Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP)-based queries related to prescreening of patients using two versions of the OMOP common data model (CDM; v5.3 and v5.4) and to assess the performance of the Greater Paris University Hospital (APHP) prescreening tool. MATERIALS AND METHODS We identified the prescreening information items being relevant for prescreening of patients with cancer. We randomly selected 15 academic and industry-sponsored urology phase I-IV clinical trials (CTs) launched at APHP between 2016 and 2021. The computability of the related prescreening criteria (PC) was defined by their translation rate in OMOP-compliant queries and by their execution rate on the APHP clinical data warehouse (CDW) containing data of 205,977 patients with cancer. The overall performance of the prescreening tool was assessed by the rate of true- and false-positive cases of three randomly selected CTs. RESULTS We defined a list of 15 minimal information items being relevant for patients' prescreening. We identified 83 PC of the 534 eligibility criteria from the 15 CTs. We translated 33 and 62 PC in queries on the basis of OMOP CDM v5.3 and v5.4, respectively (translation rates of 40% and 75%, respectively). Of the 33 PC translated in the v5.3 of the OMOP CDM, 19 could be executed on the APHP CDW (execution rate of 58%). Of 83 PC, the computability rate on the APHP CDW reached 23%. On the basis of three CTs, we identified 17, 32, and 63 patients as being potentially eligible for inclusion in those CTs, resulting in positive predictive values of 53%, 41%, and 21%, respectively. CONCLUSION We showed that PC could be formalized according to the OMOP CDM and that the oncology extension increased their translation rate through better representation of cancer natural history.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuelle Kempf
- Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Laboratoire d'Informatique Médicale et d'Ingénierie des Connaissances pour la e-Santé, LIMICS, Paris, France
- Department of Medical Oncology, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor Teaching Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Morgan Vaterkowski
- Innovation and Data, Paris, IT Department, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
- EPITA School of Engineering and Computer Science, Paris, France
| | - Damien Leprovost
- Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Laboratoire d'Informatique Médicale et d'Ingénierie des Connaissances pour la e-Santé, LIMICS, Paris, France
- Innovation and Data, Paris, IT Department, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Nicolas Griffon
- Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Laboratoire d'Informatique Médicale et d'Ingénierie des Connaissances pour la e-Santé, LIMICS, Paris, France
- Innovation and Data, Paris, IT Department, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - David Ouagne
- Innovation and Data, Paris, IT Department, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Stéphane Breant
- Innovation and Data, Paris, IT Department, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Patricia Serre
- Innovation and Data, Paris, IT Department, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Alexandre Mouchet
- Innovation and Data, Paris, IT Department, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Bastien Rance
- Department of Medical Informatics, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Centre-Université de Paris (APHP-CUP), Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Gilles Chatellier
- Department of Medical Informatics, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Centre-Université de Paris (APHP-CUP), Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Ali Bellamine
- Innovation and Data, Paris, IT Department, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Marie Frank
- Department of Medical Information, Paris Saclay Teaching Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | | | - Xavier Tannier
- Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Laboratoire d'Informatique Médicale et d'Ingénierie des Connaissances pour la e-Santé, LIMICS, Paris, France
| | | | - Martin Hilka
- Innovation and Data, Paris, IT Department, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Christel Daniel
- Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Laboratoire d'Informatique Médicale et d'Ingénierie des Connaissances pour la e-Santé, LIMICS, Paris, France
- Innovation and Data, Paris, IT Department, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chow R, Midroni J, Kaur J, Boldt G, Liu G, Eng L, Liu FF, Haibe-Kains B, Lock M, Raman S. Use of artificial intelligence for cancer clinical trial enrollment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2023; 115:365-374. [PMID: 36688707 PMCID: PMC10086633 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Revised: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the current landscape of artificial intelligence (AI) for cancer clinical trial enrollment and its predictive accuracy in identifying eligible patients for inclusion in such trials. METHODS Databases of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched until June 2022. Articles were included if they reported on AI actively being used in the clinical trial enrollment process. Narrative synthesis was conducted among all extracted data: accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. For studies where the 2x2 contingency table could be calculated or supplied by authors, a meta-analysis to calculate summary statistics was conducted using the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics curve model. RESULTS Ten articles reporting on more than 50 000 patients in 19 datasets were included. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity exceeded 80% in all but 1 dataset. Positive predictive value exceeded 80% in 5 of 17 datasets. Negative predictive value exceeded 80% in all datasets. Summary sensitivity was 90.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 70.9% to 97.4%); summary specificity was 99.3% (95% CI = 81.8% to 99.9%). CONCLUSIONS AI demonstrated comparable, if not superior, performance to manual screening for patient enrollment into cancer clinical trials. As well, AI is highly efficient, requiring less time and human resources to screen patients. AI should be further investigated and implemented for patient recruitment into cancer clinical trials. Future research should validate the use of AI for clinical trials enrollment in less resource-rich regions and ensure broad inclusion for generalizability to all sexes, ages, and ethnicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald Chow
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Julie Midroni
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jagdeep Kaur
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Gabriel Boldt
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Geoffrey Liu
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lawson Eng
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Fei-Fei Liu
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Benjamin Haibe-Kains
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michael Lock
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Srinivas Raman
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Saha A, Burns L, Kulkarni AM. A scoping review of natural language processing of radiology reports in breast cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1160167. [PMID: 37124523 PMCID: PMC10130381 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1160167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Various natural language processing (NLP) algorithms have been applied in the literature to analyze radiology reports pertaining to the diagnosis and subsequent care of cancer patients. Applications of this technology include cohort selection for clinical trials, population of large-scale data registries, and quality improvement in radiology workflows including mammography screening. This scoping review is the first to examine such applications in the specific context of breast cancer. Out of 210 identified articles initially, 44 met our inclusion criteria for this review. Extracted data elements included both clinical and technical details of studies that developed or evaluated NLP algorithms applied to free-text radiology reports of breast cancer. Our review illustrates an emphasis on applications in diagnostic and screening processes over treatment or therapeutic applications and describes growth in deep learning and transfer learning approaches in recent years, although rule-based approaches continue to be useful. Furthermore, we observe increased efforts in code and software sharing but not with data sharing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashirbani Saha
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Hamilton Health Sciences and McMaster University, Escarpment Cancer Research Institute, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- *Correspondence: Ashirbani Saha,
| | - Levi Burns
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|