1
|
Tezuka K, Yamakawa M, Murakami R, Hirai I, Toya R, Suzuki A, Kawamura H, Miyano Y, Sato H, Motoi F. Familial Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm Associated With the Germline MSH6 Missense Variant and Progression of Pancreatic cancer. Pancreas 2024; 53:e476-e486. [PMID: 38416847 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000002313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) in individuals with at least one first-degree relative with IPMN is defined as familial IPMN. However, few studies have reported on familial IPMN, its clinical characteristics, or the associated genetic factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS We report the case of a 58-year-old woman with multifocal IPMN and a mural nodule in the pancreatic body. The patient underwent a distal pancreatectomy and developed pancreatic head cancer 1 year and 6 months postoperatively. The patient had a family history of multifocal IPMN in her father. Therefore, a genetic predisposition to IPMN and pancreatic cancer was suspected. The patient was analyzed for germline variants, and the resected IPMN was subjected to immunohistochemical and somatic variant analyses. RESULTS Next-generation sequencing revealed a heterozygous germline missense variant in exon 5 of MSH6 (c.3197A>G; Tyr1066Cys). The pathogenicity of this variant of uncertain significance was suspected based on multiple in silico analyses, and the same MSH6 variant was identified in the patient's father's colonic adenoma. The mural nodule in the pancreatic body was pathologically diagnosed as a high-grade IPMN with ossification and somatic KRAS and PIK3CA variants. CONCLUSIONS This case revealed a possible genetic factor for familial IPMN development and presented interesting clinicopathological findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ryoko Murakami
- Genome Informatics Unit, Institution for Promotion of Medical Science Research, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine
| | | | | | | | | | - Yuki Miyano
- Genome Informatics Unit, Institution for Promotion of Medical Science Research, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine
| | - Hidenori Sato
- Genome Informatics Unit, Institution for Promotion of Medical Science Research, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine
| | - Fuyuhiko Motoi
- First Department of Surgery, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ando Y, Dbouk M, Yoshida T, Abou Diwan E, Saba H, Dbouk A, Yoshida K, Roberts NJ, Klein AP, Burkhart R, He J, Hruban RH, Goggins M. Germline Pathogenic Variants in Patients With Pancreatic and Periampullary Cancers. JCO Precis Oncol 2024; 8:e2400101. [PMID: 38781545 DOI: 10.1200/po.24.00101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2024] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Inherited cancer susceptibility is often not suspected in the absence of a significant cancer family history. Pathogenic germline variants in pancreatic cancer are well-studied, and routine genetic testing is recommended in the guidelines. However, data on rare periampullary cancers other than pancreatic cancer are insufficient. We compared the prevalence of germline susceptibility variants in patients with pancreatic cancer and nonpancreatic periampullary cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS Six hundred and eight patients who had undergone pancreaticoduodenal resection at a tertiary referral hospital were studied, including 213 with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, 172 with ampullary cancer, 154 with distal common bile duct cancer, and 69 with duodenal adenocarcinoma. Twenty cancer susceptibility and candidate susceptibility genes were sequenced, and variant interpretation was assessed by interrogating ClinVar and PubMed. RESULTS Pathogenic or likely pathogenic, moderate- to high-penetrant germline variants were identified in 46 patients (7.7%), including a similar percentage of patients with pancreatic (8.5%) and nonpancreatic periampullary cancer (7.1%). Low-penetrant variants were identified in an additional 11 patients (1.8%). Eighty-nine percent of the moderate- to high-penetrant variants involved the major cancer susceptibility genes BRCA2, ATM, BRCA1, CDKN2A, MSH2/MLH1, and PALB2; the remaining 11% involved other cancer susceptibility genes such as BRIP1, BAP1, and MSH6. Almost all pathogenic variant carriers had a family history of cancer. CONCLUSION Patients with pancreatic and nonpancreatic periampullary cancer have a similar prevalence of pathogenic cancer susceptibility variants. Germline susceptibility testing should be considered for patients with any periampullary cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yohei Ando
- Departments of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Mohamad Dbouk
- Departments of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Takeichi Yoshida
- Departments of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Elizabeth Abou Diwan
- Departments of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Helena Saba
- Departments of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ali Dbouk
- Departments of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Kanako Yoshida
- Departments of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Nicholas J Roberts
- Departments of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
- Departments of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Alison P Klein
- Departments of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
- Departments of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
- The Bloomberg School of Public Health, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Richard Burkhart
- Departments of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jin He
- Departments of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ralph H Hruban
- Departments of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
- Departments of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
- The Bloomberg School of Public Health, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Michael Goggins
- Departments of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
- Departments of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
- Departments of Medicine, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Qiu M, Chen Y, Zeng C. Biological functions of circRNA in regulating the hallmarks of gastrointestinal cancer (Review). Int J Oncol 2024; 64:49. [PMID: 38488023 PMCID: PMC10997371 DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2024.5637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Circular RNA (circRNA) was first observed in the cytoplasm of eukaryotic cells in 1979, but it was not characterized in detail until 2012, when high‑throughput sequencing technology was more advanced and available. Consequently, the mechanism of circRNA formation and its biological function have been progressively elucidated by researchers. circRNA is abundant in eukaryotic cells and exhibits a certain degree of organization, timing and disease‑specificity. Additionally, it is poorly degradable, meeting the characteristics of an ideal clinical biomarker. In the present review, the recent research progress of circRNAs in digestive tract malignant tumors was primarily discussed. This included the roles, biological functions and clinical significance of circRNA, providing references for its research value and clinical potential in gastrointestinal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengjun Qiu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Disease Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330006, P.R. China
| | - Youxiang Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Disease Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330006, P.R. China
| | - Chunyan Zeng
- Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Disease Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330006, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bogdanski AM, van Hooft JE, Boekestijn B, Bonsing BA, Wasser MNJM, Klatte DCF, van Leerdam ME. Aspects and outcomes of surveillance for individuals at high-risk of pancreatic cancer. Fam Cancer 2024:10.1007/s10689-024-00368-1. [PMID: 38619782 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-024-00368-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths and is associated with a poor prognosis. The majority of these cancers are detected at a late stage, contributing to the bad prognosis. This underscores the need for novel, enhanced early detection strategies to improve the outcomes. While population-based screening is not recommended due to the relatively low incidence of PDAC, surveillance is recommended for individuals at high risk for PDAC due to their increased incidence of the disease. However, the outcomes of pancreatic cancer surveillance in high-risk individuals are not sorted out yet. In this review, we will address the identification of individuals at high risk for PDAC, discuss the objectives and targets of surveillance, outline how surveillance programs are organized, summarize the outcomes of high-risk individuals undergoing pancreatic cancer surveillance, and conclude with a future perspective on pancreatic cancer surveillance and novel developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksander M Bogdanski
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Boekestijn
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Bert A Bonsing
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Martin N J M Wasser
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Derk C F Klatte
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Paiella S, Capurso G, Carrara S, Secchettin E, Casciani F, Frigerio I, Zerbi A, Archibugi L, Bonifacio C, Malleo G, Cavestro GM, Barile M, Larghi A, Assisi D, Fantin A, Milanetto AC, Fabbri C, Casadei R, Donato G, Sassatelli R, De Marchi G, Di Matteo FM, Arcangeli V, Panzuto F, Puzzono M, Dal Buono A, Pezzilli R, Salvia R, Rizzatti G, Casadio M, Franco M, Butturini G, Pasquali C, Coluccio C, Ricci C, Cicchese N, Sereni G, de Pretis N, Stigliano S, Rudnas B, Marasco M, Lionetto G, Arcidiacono PG, Terrin M, Crovetto A, Mannucci A, Laghi L, Bassi C, Falconi M. Outcomes of a 3-Year Prospective Surveillance in Individuals at High Risk of Pancreatic Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2024; 119:739-747. [PMID: 37787643 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pancreatic cancer (PC) surveillance of high-risk individuals (HRI) is becoming more common worldwide, aiming at anticipating PC diagnosis at a preclinical stage. In 2015, the Italian Registry of Families at Risk of Pancreatic Cancer was created. We aimed to assess the prevalence and incidence of pancreatic findings, oncological outcomes, and harms 7 years after the Italian Registry of Families at Risk of Pancreatic Cancer inception, focusing on individuals with at least a 3-year follow-up or developing events before. METHODS HRI (subjects with a family history or mutation carriers with/without a family history were enrolled in 18 centers). They underwent annual magnetic resonance with cholangiopancreatography or endoscopic ultrasound (NCT04095195). RESULTS During the study period (June 2015-September 2022), 679 individuals were enrolled. Of these, 524 (77.2%) underwent at least baseline imaging, and 156 (29.8%) with at least a 3-year follow-up or pancreatic malignancy/premalignancy-related events, and represented the study population. The median age was 51 (interquartile range 16) years. Familial PC cases accounted for 81.4% of HRI and individuals with pathogenic variant for 18.6%. Malignant (n = 8) and premalignant (1 PanIN3) lesions were found in 9 individuals. Five of these 8 cases occurred in pathogenic variant carriers, 4 in familial PC cases (2 tested negative at germline testing and 2 others were not tested). Three of the 8 PC were stage I. Five of the 8 PC were resectable, 3 Stage I, all advanced cases being prevalent. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year cumulative hazard of PC was 1.7%, 2.5%, and 3%, respectively. Median overall and disease-free survival of patients with resected PC were 18 and 12 months (95% CI not computable). Considering HRI who underwent baseline imaging, 6 pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (1 resected) and 1 low-yield surgery (low-grade mixed-intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm) were also reported. DISCUSSION PC surveillance in a fully public health care system is feasible and safe, and leads to early PC or premalignant lesions diagnoses, mostly at baseline but also over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvatore Paiella
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Gabriele Capurso
- Pancreatico-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Centre, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Carrara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital, IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Erica Secchettin
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Pediatrics, and Gynecology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Fabio Casciani
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Isabella Frigerio
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Unit, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Zerbi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
- Pancreatic Surgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Livia Archibugi
- Pancreatico-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Centre, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Giuseppe Malleo
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Giulia Martina Cavestro
- Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Monica Barile
- Genetics and Cancer Prevention, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Larghi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniela Assisi
- UOSD Gastroenterologia ed Endoscopia Digestiva Istituto Nazionale Tumori Regina Elena, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Fantin
- Gastroenterology Unit Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Anna Caterina Milanetto
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Pancreatic and Endocrine Surgery Unit, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Carlo Fabbri
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, Italy
| | - Riccardo Casadei
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giulio Donato
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Oncological and Specialty Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy
| | - Romano Sassatelli
- Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Azienda USL-IRCCS Di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Giulia De Marchi
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona Italy
| | | | - Valentina Arcangeli
- Romagna Cancer Registry IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori" (IRST), Meldola, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | - Francesco Panzuto
- Digestive Disease Unit, Sant' Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy
- Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Marta Puzzono
- Radiology Department, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Arianna Dal Buono
- Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital, IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Roberto Salvia
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Marco Casadio
- UOSD Gastroenterologia ed Endoscopia Digestiva Istituto Nazionale Tumori Regina Elena, Rome, Italy
| | - Monica Franco
- Gastroenterology Unit Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Giovanni Butturini
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Unit, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - Claudio Pasquali
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Pancreatic and Endocrine Surgery Unit, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Chiara Coluccio
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, Italy
| | - Claudio Ricci
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Noemi Cicchese
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Oncological and Specialty Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy
| | - Giuliana Sereni
- Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Azienda USL-IRCCS Di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Nicolò de Pretis
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona Italy
| | - Serena Stigliano
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Britt Rudnas
- Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori" (IRST), Meldola, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | - Matteo Marasco
- Digestive Disease Unit, Sant' Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriella Lionetto
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono
- Pancreatico-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Centre, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Terrin
- Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital, IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Crovetto
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Mannucci
- Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Laghi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
- Laboratory of Molecular Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Claudio Bassi
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Division of Pancreatic and Transplantation Surgery, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ben-Ami R, Wang QL, Zhang J, Supplee JG, Fahrmann JF, Lehmann-Werman R, Brais LK, Nowak J, Yuan C, Loftus M, Babic A, Irajizad E, Davidi T, Zick A, Hubert A, Neiman D, Piyanzin S, Gal-Rosenberg O, Horn A, Shemer R, Glaser B, Boos N, Jajoo K, Lee L, Clancy TE, Rubinson DA, Ng K, Chabot JA, Kastrinos F, Kluger M, Aguirre AJ, Jänne PA, Bardeesy N, Stanger B, O'Hara MH, Till J, Maitra A, Carpenter EL, Bullock AJ, Genkinger J, Hanash SM, Paweletz CP, Dor Y, Wolpin BM. Protein biomarkers and alternatively methylated cell-free DNA detect early stage pancreatic cancer. Gut 2024; 73:639-648. [PMID: 38123998 PMCID: PMC10958271 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-331074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 11/26/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is commonly diagnosed at an advanced stage. Liquid biopsy approaches may facilitate detection of early stage PDAC when curative treatments can be employed. DESIGN To assess circulating marker discrimination in training, testing and validation patient cohorts (total n=426 patients), plasma markers were measured among PDAC cases and patients with chronic pancreatitis, colorectal cancer (CRC), and healthy controls. Using CA19-9 as an anchor marker, measurements were made of two protein markers (TIMP1, LRG1) and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) pancreas-specific methylation at 9 loci encompassing 61 CpG sites. RESULTS Comparative methylome analysis identified nine loci that were differentially methylated in exocrine pancreas DNA. In the training set (n=124 patients), cfDNA methylation markers distinguished PDAC from healthy and CRC controls. In the testing set of 86 early stage PDAC and 86 matched healthy controls, CA19-9 had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.88 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.94), which was increased by adding TIMP1 (AUC 0.92; 95% CI 0.88 to 0.96; p=0.06), LRG1 (AUC 0.92; 95% CI 0.88 to 0.96; p=0.02) or exocrine pancreas-specific cfDNA methylation markers at nine loci (AUC 0.92; 95% CI 0.88 to 0.96; p=0.02). In the validation set of 40 early stage PDAC and 40 matched healthy controls, a combined panel including CA19-9, TIMP1 and a 9-loci cfDNA methylation panel had greater discrimination (AUC 0.86, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.95) than CA19-9 alone (AUC 0.82; 95% CI 0.72 to 0.92). CONCLUSION A combined panel of circulating markers including proteins and methylated cfDNA increased discrimination compared with CA19-9 alone for early stage PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roni Ben-Ami
- Department of Developmental Biology and Cancer Research, IMRIC, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Qiao-Li Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jinming Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Julianna G Supplee
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Johannes F Fahrmann
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Roni Lehmann-Werman
- Department of Developmental Biology and Cancer Research, IMRIC, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Lauren K Brais
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jonathan Nowak
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Chen Yuan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Maureen Loftus
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ana Babic
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ehsan Irajizad
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Tal Davidi
- Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Aviad Zick
- Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Ayala Hubert
- Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Daniel Neiman
- Department of Developmental Biology and Cancer Research, IMRIC, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Sheina Piyanzin
- Department of Developmental Biology and Cancer Research, IMRIC, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Ofer Gal-Rosenberg
- Department of Developmental Biology and Cancer Research, IMRIC, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Amit Horn
- Department of Developmental Biology and Cancer Research, IMRIC, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Ruth Shemer
- Department of Developmental Biology and Cancer Research, IMRIC, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Benjamin Glaser
- Department of Developmental Biology and Cancer Research, IMRIC, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Natalia Boos
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kunal Jajoo
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Linda Lee
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Thomas E Clancy
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Douglas A Rubinson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kimmie Ng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - John A Chabot
- Department of Surgery, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Fay Kastrinos
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University Irving Medical Cancer and the Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
| | - Michael Kluger
- Department of Surgery, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Andrew J Aguirre
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Pasi A Jänne
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nabeel Bardeesy
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ben Stanger
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Abramson Family Cancer Research Institute, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mark H O'Hara
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jacob Till
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Anirban Maitra
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Erica L Carpenter
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Andrea J Bullock
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Beth-Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jeanine Genkinger
- Department of epidemiology, Mailman school of public health, Columbia university, New York, New York, USA
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia university Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Samir M Hanash
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Cloud P Paweletz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Yuval Dor
- Department of Developmental Biology and Cancer Research, IMRIC, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Brian M Wolpin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Anstadt EJ, Carmona R, Berlin E, Yegya-Raman N, Venigalla S, Reddy V, Williams GR, Leibensperger MR, Wojcieszynski A, Baumann BC, Lee MK, Plastaras JP, Furth EE, Mell LK, Metz JM, Ben-Josef E. SMAD4 loss predicts worse overall and distant metastasis-free survival in patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer 2024; 130:476-484. [PMID: 37823514 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Revised: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In select patients, pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains a local disease, yet there are no validated biomarkers to predict this behavior and who may benefit from aggressive local treatments. This study sought to determine if SMAD4 (mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 4) messenger RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) expression is a robust method for predicting overall survival (OS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. METHODS Utilizing The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC), 322 patients with resected stage I-III pancreatic adenocarcinoma were identified. In TCGA, multivariable proportional hazards models were used to determine the association of SMAD4 genomic aberrations and RNA-seq expression with OS and DMFS. In the ICGC, analysis sought to confirm the predictive performance of RNA-seq via multivariable models and receiver operator characteristic curves. RESULTS In TCGA, the presence of SMAD4 genomic aberrations was associated with worse OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.55; 95% CI, 1.00-2.40; p = .048) but not DMFS (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, .87-2.03; p = .19). Low SMAD4 RNA-seq expression was associated with worse OS (HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.17-2.86; p = .008) and DMFS (HR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.14-2.54; p = .009). In the ICGC, increased SMAD4 RNA-seq expression correlated with improved OS (area under the curve [AUC], .92; 95% CI, .86-.94) and DMFS (AUC, .84; 95% CI, .82-.87). CONCLUSIONS In patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma, SMAD4 genomic aberrations are associated with worse OS but do not predict for DMFS. Increased SMAD4 RNA-seq expression is associated with improved OS and DMFS in patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This reproducible finding suggests SMAD4 RNA-seq expression may be a useful marker to predict metastatic spread.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily J Anstadt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ruben Carmona
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Eva Berlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nikhil Yegya-Raman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sriram Venigalla
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Vishruth Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Graeme R Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mark R Leibensperger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Andrzej Wojcieszynski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Brian C Baumann
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Major K Lee
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - John P Plastaras
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Emma E Furth
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Loren K Mell
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - James M Metz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Edgar Ben-Josef
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Das KK. Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms in High-Risk Individuals: True, True, and Related? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 22:20-21. [PMID: 37442319 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.06.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Koushik K Das
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
He TC, Li JA, Xu ZH, Chen QD, Yin HL, Pu N, Wang WQ, Liu L. Biological and clinical implications of early-onset cancers: A unique subtype. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2023; 190:104120. [PMID: 37660930 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
In recent years, the incidence of cancers is continuously increasing in young adults. Early-onset cancer (EOC) is usually defined as patients with cancers under the age of 50, and may represent a unique subgroup due to its special disease features. Overall, EOCs often initiate at a young age, present as a better physical performance but high degree of malignancy. EOCs also share common epidemiological and hereditary risk factors. In this review, we discuss several representative EOCs which were well studied previously. By revealing their clinical and molecular similarities and differences, we consider the group of EOCs as a unique subtype compared to ordinary cancers. In consideration of EOC as a rising threat to human health, more researches on molecular mechanisms, and large-scale, prospective clinical trials should be carried out to further translate into improved outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao-Chen He
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Jian-Ang Li
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Zhi-Hang Xu
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Qiang-Da Chen
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Han-Lin Yin
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Ning Pu
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
| | - Wen-Quan Wang
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
| | - Liang Liu
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Haimi I, Dettwyler S, Everett J, Simeone DM. Are All Cysts Created Equal?: Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms in Patients with Familial or Genetic Risk Factors for Pancreatic Cancer. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2023; 33:547-557. [PMID: 37245935 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2023.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) have become more prevalent over time, particularly in asymptomatic individuals. Current screening guidelines for incidental PCLs offer a unified approach to surveillance and management, predicated on "worrisome features." Although PCLs are common in the general population, their prevalence may be higher in high-risk individuals (HRI, unaffected patients with specific familial and/or genetic risk factors). As more PCLs are diagnosed and more HRI identified, it is important to promote research that bridges data gaps and introduces nuance to risk assessment tools, ensuring tailoring of guidelines to the needs of HRI with varying pancreatic cancer risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ido Haimi
- Department of Surgery, NYU Langone Health, 240 East 38th Street, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Shenin Dettwyler
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, 240 East 38th Street, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Jessica Everett
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, 240 East 38th Street, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Diane M Simeone
- Department of Surgery, NYU Langone Health, 240 East 38th Street, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10016, USA; Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, 240 East 38th Street, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10016, USA; Pancreatic Cancer Center, 240 East 38th Street, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10016, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lehman B, Matthäi E, Gercke N, Denzer UW, Figiel J, Hess T, Slater EP, Bartsch DK. Characteristics of familial pancreatic cancer families with additional colorectal carcinoma. Fam Cancer 2023; 22:323-330. [PMID: 36717525 PMCID: PMC10276072 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-023-00328-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) is a rare hereditary tumor entity with broad phenotypic heterogeneity, including colorectal carcinoma (CRC) in some families. The underlying factors for this co-occurrence are still not well evaluated. FPC families in the National Case Collection of Familial Pancreatic Cancer with an additional occurrence of CRC were analyzed regarding the phenotype, genotype and recommendation for a clinical screening program. The total cohort of 272 FPC families included 30 (11%) families with at least one CRC case. The proportion of affected family members with PDAC was 16.1% (73/451) compared to 9.3% of family members with CRC (42/451, p < 0.01). Females were affected with PDAC in 49% (36/73) and CRC in 38% (16/42). The median age of PDAC was 63 compared to 66 years in CRC, whereas 8 (26.6%) of families had an early onset of PDAC and 2 (6.7%) of CRC. Seventeen families had 2 or more affected generations with PDAC and 6 families with CRC. Eleven (9.6%) of affected patients had both PDAC and CRC. Potentially causative germline mutations (2 ATM, 1 CDKN2a, 1 MLH1, 1 PALB2) were detected in 5 of 18 (27.7%) analyzed cases. These findings provide a step forward to include the phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of FPC-CRC families for the genetic counseling and management of these families. Nevertheless, results need to be verified in a larger patient cohort beforehand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bettina Lehman
- Departments of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Philipps University Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043, Marburg, Germany.
| | - Elvira Matthäi
- Departments of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Philipps University Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043, Marburg, Germany
| | - Norman Gercke
- Departments of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Philipps University Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043, Marburg, Germany
| | - Ulrike W Denzer
- Gastroenterology and Endocrinology, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Jens Figiel
- Gastroenterology and Endocrinology, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Timo Hess
- Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Emily P Slater
- Departments of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Philipps University Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043, Marburg, Germany
| | - Detlef K Bartsch
- Departments of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Philipps University Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043, Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Guerra E, Di Pietro R, Stati G, Alberti S. A non-mutated TROP2 fingerprint in cancer genetics. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1151090. [PMID: 37456256 PMCID: PMC10338868 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1151090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
The advent of high throughput DNA sequencing is providing massive amounts of tumor-associated mutation data. Implicit in these analyses is the assumption that, by acquiring a series of hallmark changes, normal cells evolve along a neoplastic path. However, the lack of correlation between cancer risk and global exposure to mutagenic factors provides arguments against this model. This suggested that additional, non-mutagenic factors are at work in cancer development. A candidate determinant is TROP2, that stands out for its expression in the majority of solid tumors in human, for its impact on the prognosis of most solid cancers and for its role as driver of cancer growth and metastatic diffusion, through overexpression as a wild-type form. The Trop-2 signaling network encompasses CREB1, Jun, NF-κB, Rb, STAT1 and STAT3, through induction of cyclin D1 and MAPK/ERK. Notably, Trop-2-driven pathways vastly overlap with those activated by most functionally relevant/most frequently mutated RAS and TP53, and are co-expressed in a large fraction of individual tumor cases, suggesting functional overlap. Mutated Ras was shown to synergize with the TROP2-CYCLIND1 mRNA chimera in transforming primary cells into tumorigenic ones. Genomic loss of TROP2 was found to promote carcinogenesis in squamous cell carcinomas through modulation of Src and mutated Ras pathways. DNA methylation and TP53 status were shown to cause genome instability and TROP gene amplification, together with Trop-2 protein overexpression. These findings suggest that mutagenic and the TROP2 non-mutagenic pathways deeply intertwine in driving transformed cell growth and malignant progression of solid cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuela Guerra
- Laboratory of Cancer Pathology, Center for Advanced Studies and Technology (CAST), "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Roberta Di Pietro
- Department of Medicine and Aging Sciences, Section of Biomorphology, G. d'Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
- Sbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Center for Biotechnology, Department of Biology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Gianmarco Stati
- Department of Medicine and Aging Sciences, Section of Biomorphology, G. d'Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Saverio Alberti
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Biomedical Sciences - Biomedical Sciences (BIOMORF), University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ishimoto-Namiki U, Ino Y, Esaki M, Shimada K, Saruta M, Hiraoka N. Novel Insights Into Immunohistochemical Analysis For Acinar Cell Neoplasm of The Pancreas: Carboxypeptidase A2, Carboxypeptidase A1, and Glycoprotein 2. Am J Surg Pathol 2023; 47:525-534. [PMID: 36815573 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000002024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
Acinar cell carcinoma (ACC) is a rare and highly malignant pancreatic tumor. Owing to histologic similarity, ACC is often difficult to distinguish from other solid medullary pancreatic tumors, particularly neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) and intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm (ITPN). We aimed to identify new immunohistochemical markers commonly expressed in tumor cells with acinar cell differentiation and useful for both surgical and small biopsy specimens. Candidate molecules exclusively expressed in neoplastic or non-neoplastic acinar cells in pancreatic tissues with specific and available antibodies suitable for immunohistochemistry were selected. We selected carboxypeptidase A1 (CPA1), carboxypeptidase A2 (CPA2), and glycoprotein 2 (GP2), which were expressed in 100%, 100%, and 96% of cases, respectively, in ACC (n=27) or neoplasia with acinar cell differentiation, including mixed acinar-neuroendocrine carcinoma (n=9), mixed acinar-ductal carcinoma (n=3), pancreatoblastoma (n=4), and acinar cystic transformation (n=2), in the cytoplasm of tumor cells with a granular pattern. Both CPA2 and CPA1 were not expressed in any other tumors without acinar cell differentiation, including NEN (n=44), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (n=44), and ITPN (n=4). GP2 was not expressed in these tumors except in rare cases, including 14% of NEN, 15% of intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasm, 25% of intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasm, 25% of ITPN, and 7% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, wherein a small proportion of tumor cells expressed GP2 in their apical cell membrane. NEN cases also showed cytoplasmic GP2 expression. Therefore, CPA2, CPA1, and potentially GP2 may act as ACC markers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Utako Ishimoto-Namiki
- Division of Molecular Pathology
- Department of Analytical Pathology, National Cancer Center Research Institute
- Department of Molecular Oncology
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Jikei University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Yoshinori Ino
- Division of Molecular Pathology
- Department of Analytical Pathology, National Cancer Center Research Institute
| | - Minoru Esaki
- Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital
| | - Kazuaki Shimada
- Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital
| | - Masayuki Saruta
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Jikei University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Nobuyoshi Hiraoka
- Division of Molecular Pathology
- Department of Analytical Pathology, National Cancer Center Research Institute
- Department of Molecular Oncology
- Division of Innovative Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, National Cancer Center EPOC, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pan M, Jiang C, Zhang Z, Achacoso N, Alexeeff S, Solorzano AV, Tse P, Chung E, Sundaresan T, Suga JM, Thomas S, Habel LA. TP53 Gain-of-Function and Non-Gain-of-Function Mutations Are Associated With Differential Prognosis in Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. JCO Precis Oncol 2023; 7:e2200570. [PMID: 37163715 DOI: 10.1200/po.22.00570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine the impact of TP53 gain-of-function (GOF) and non-GOF mutations on prognosis of advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) among patients with KRAS, CDKN2A, and SMAD4 comutations. METHODS This cohort included patients with locally advanced, recurrent, and de novo metastatic PDAC with next-generation sequencing performed from November 2017 to May 2022. We defined R175H, R248W, R248Q, R249S, R273H, R273L, and R282W as GOF and all other p53 mutations (mutp53) as non-GOF. We used Cox regression modeling to examine the association between GOF and non-GOF mutp53 and overall survival (OS), adjusting for demographics, performance status, Charlson comorbidity index, receipt of chemotherapy, and KRAS, CDKN2A, and SMAD4 comutations. RESULTS Of 893 total eligible patients, 68.5% had tumors with mutp53, 90.1% had KRAS mutations (mutKRAS), 44.7% had CDKN2A mutations (mutCDKN2A), and 17.0% had SMAD4 mutations. Among patients with mutp53, 121 had GOF and 491 had non-GOF. GOF mutp53 was associated with worse OS than non-GOF mutp53 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.27; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.59) and wild-type p53 (wtp53; HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.57), whereas non-GOF was not associated with worse OS than wtp53 (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.13). In addition, mutKRAS was associated with worse OS than wild-type KRAS in patients with mutCDKN2A (HR, 1.57; 95% CI, 0.88 to 2.80) but not in patients with wild-type CDKN2A (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.39). CONCLUSION GOF and non-GOF mutp53 were associated with differential prognosis in advanced PDAC. The adverse effect of mutKRAS on OS appeared to be primarily driven by patients with mutCDKN2A. Our results provide new insight that could be helpful for prognostic stratification in clinical practice and for aiding future clinical trial designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minggui Pan
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Kaiser Permanente, Santa Clara, CA
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA
| | - Chen Jiang
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA
| | - Zheyang Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, School of Life Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China
- National Institute for Data Science in Health and Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China
| | | | | | | | - Pam Tse
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA
| | - Elaine Chung
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA
| | - Tilak Sundaresan
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Kaiser Permanente, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Sachdev Thomas
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Kaiser Permanente, Santa Clara, CA
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gu Y, Hua Q, Li Z, Zhang X, Lou C, Zhang Y, Wang W, Cai P, Zhao J. Diagnostic value of combining preoperative inflammatory markers ratios with CA199 for patients with early-stage pancreatic cancer. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:227. [PMID: 36899319 PMCID: PMC9999638 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10653-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND An early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer (PC) is extremely difficult because of the lack of sensitive liquid biopsy methods and effective biomarkers. We attempted to evaluate whether circulating inflammatory marker could complement CA199 for the detection of early-stage PC. METHODS We enrolled 430 patients with early-stage PC, 287 patients with other pancreatic tumors (OPT), and 401 healthy controls (HC). The patients and HC were randomly divided into a training set (n = 872) and two testing sets (n1 = 218, n2 = 28). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were investigated to evaluate the diagnostic performance of circulating inflammatory markers ratios, CA199, and combinations of the markers ratios in the training set, which would then be validated in the two testing sets. RESULTS Circulating fibrinogen, neutrophils, and monocytes in patients with PC were significantly higher while circulating albumin, prealbumin, lymphocytes, and platelets of patients with PC were significantly lower compared to those of HC and OPT (all P < 0.05). The fibrinogen-to-albumin (FAR), fibrinogen-to-prealbumin (FPR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte (MLR), and fibrinogen-to-lymphocyte (FLR) ratios were significantly higher while the prognostic nutrition index values (PNI) were lower in patients with PC than in HC and OPT (all P < 0.05). Combining the FAR, FPR, and FLR with CA199 exhibited the best diagnostic value for distinguishing patients with early-stage PC from HC with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.964, and for distinguishing patients with early-stage PC from OPT with an AUC of 0.924 in the training sets. In the testing set, compared with HC, the combination markers had powerful efficiency for PC with an AUC 0.947 and AUC 0.942 when comparing PC with OPT. The AUC was 0.915 for the combination of CA199, FAR, FPR, and FLR for differentiating between patients with pancreatic head cancer (PHC) and other pancreatic head tumors (OPHT), and 0.894 for differentiating between patients with pancreatic body and tail cancer (PBTC) and other pancreatic body and tail tumors (OPBTT). CONCLUSION A combination of FAR, FPR, FLR, and CA199 may serve as a potential non-invasive biomarker for differentiating early-stage PC from HC and OPT, especially early-stage PHC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuanlong Gu
- Department of Interventional Oncology, Municipal Hospital Affiliated to Taizhou University, Taizhou, China.,Biotherapy Center, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Qianjin Hua
- Department of Interventional Oncology, Municipal Hospital Affiliated to Taizhou University, Taizhou, China
| | - Zhipeng Li
- School of Medicine, Taizhou University, Taizhou, 318000, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xingli Zhang
- Biotherapy Center, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Changjie Lou
- Biotherapy Center, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Yangfen Zhang
- School of Medicine, Taizhou University, Taizhou, 318000, Zhejiang, China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Interventional Oncology, Municipal Hospital Affiliated to Taizhou University, Taizhou, China
| | - Peiyuan Cai
- Department of Interventional Oncology, Municipal Hospital Affiliated to Taizhou University, Taizhou, China
| | - Juan Zhao
- Biotherapy Center, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Stoffel EM, Brand RE, Goggins M. Pancreatic Cancer: Changing Epidemiology and New Approaches to Risk Assessment, Early Detection, and Prevention. Gastroenterology 2023; 164:752-765. [PMID: 36804602 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer usually results in poor survival with limited options for treatment, as most affected individuals present with advanced disease. Early detection of preinvasive pancreatic neoplasia and identifying molecular therapeutic targets provide opportunities for extending survival. Although screening for pancreatic cancer is currently not recommended for the general population, emerging evidence indicates that pancreatic surveillance can improve outcomes for individuals in certain high-risk groups. Changes in the epidemiology of pancreatic cancer, experience from pancreatic surveillance, and discovery of novel biomarkers provide a roadmap for new strategies for pancreatic cancer risk assessment, early detection, and prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena M Stoffel
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
| | - Randall E Brand
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael Goggins
- Departments of Medicine and Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mazer BL, Lee JW, Roberts NJ, Chu LC, Lennon AM, Klein AP, Eshleman JR, Fishman EK, Canto MI, Goggins MG, Hruban RH. Screening for pancreatic cancer has the potential to save lives, but is it practical? Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 17:555-574. [PMID: 37212770 PMCID: PMC10424088 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2023.2217354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Most patients with pancreatic cancer present with advanced stage, incurable disease. However, patients with high-grade precancerous lesions and many patients with low-stage disease can be cured with surgery, suggesting that early detection has the potential to improve survival. While serum CA19.9 has been a long-standing biomarker used for pancreatic cancer disease monitoring, its low sensitivity and poor specificity have driven investigators to hunt for better diagnostic markers. AREAS COVERED This review will cover recent advances in genetics, proteomics, imaging, and artificial intelligence, which offer opportunities for the early detection of curable pancreatic neoplasms. EXPERT OPINION From exosomes, to circulating tumor DNA, to subtle changes on imaging, we know much more now about the biology and clinical manifestations of early pancreatic neoplasia than we did just five years ago. The overriding challenge, however, remains the development of a practical approach to screen for a relatively rare, but deadly, disease that is often treated with complex surgery. It is our hope that future advances will bring us closer to an effective and financially sound approach for the early detection of pancreatic cancer and its precursors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin L. Mazer
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Pathology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jae W. Lee
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Pathology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Nicholas J. Roberts
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Pathology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Oncology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Linda C. Chu
- Department of Radiology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Anne Marie Lennon
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alison P. Klein
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Pathology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Oncology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - James R. Eshleman
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Pathology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Oncology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Elliot K. Fishman
- Department of Radiology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Marcia Irene Canto
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael G. Goggins
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Pathology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Oncology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ralph H. Hruban
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Pathology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Oncology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sándor M, Thiel FG, Schmid M, Demcsák A, Morales Granda NC, Németh BC, Vajda S, Hoerning A, Sahin-Tóth M. Novel p.G250A Mutation Associated with Chronic Pancreatitis Highlights Misfolding-Prone Region in Carboxypeptidase A1 (CPA1). Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms232415463. [PMID: 36555104 PMCID: PMC9779553 DOI: 10.3390/ijms232415463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Inborn mutations in the digestive protease carboxypeptidase A1 (CPA1) gene may be associated with hereditary and idiopathic chronic pancreatitis (CP). Pathogenic mutations, such as p.N256K, cause intracellular retention and reduced secretion of CPA1, accompanied by endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, suggesting that mutation-induced misfolding underlies the phenotype. Here, we report the novel p.G250A CPA1 mutation found in a young patient with CP. Functional properties of the p.G250A mutation were identical to those of the p.N256K mutation, confirming its pathogenic nature. We noted that both mutations are in a catalytically important loop of CPA1 that is stabilized by the Cys248-Cys271 disulfide bond. Mutation of either or both Cys residues to Ala resulted in misfolding, as judged by the loss of CPA1 secretion and intracellular retention. We re-analyzed seven previously reported CPA1 mutations that affect this loop and found that all exhibited reduced secretion and caused ER stress of varying degrees. The magnitude of ER stress was proportional to the secretion defect. Replacing the naturally occurring mutations with Ala (e.g., p.V251A for p.V251M) restored secretion, with the notable exception of p.N256A. We conclude that the disulfide-stabilized loop of CPA1 is prone to mutation-induced misfolding, in most cases due to the disruptive nature of the newly introduced side chain. We propose that disease-causing CPA1 mutations exhibit abolished or markedly reduced secretion with pronounced ER stress, whereas CPA1 mutations with milder misfolding phenotypes may be associated with lower disease risk or may not be pathogenic at all.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Máté Sándor
- Department of Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Franziska G. Thiel
- Department of Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
- Department of Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany
| | - Margit Schmid
- Clinic for Children and Adolescent Medicine, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Alexandra Demcsák
- Department of Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | | | - Balázs Csaba Németh
- Department of Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Sandor Vajda
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - André Hoerning
- Clinic for Children and Adolescent Medicine, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Miklós Sahin-Tóth
- Department of Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-(310)-267-5905
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Seufferlein T, Mayerle J, Böck S, Brunner T, Ettrich TJ, Grenacher L, Gress TM, Hackert T, Heinemann V, Kestler A, Sinn M, Tannapfel A, Wedding U, Uhl W. S3-Leitlinie zum exokrinen Pankreaskarzinom – Langversion 2.0 – Dezember 2021 – AWMF-Registernummer: 032/010OL. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2022; 60:e812-e909. [PMID: 36368658 DOI: 10.1055/a-1856-7346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Stefan Böck
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik III, Universitätsklinikum München, Germany
| | - Thomas Brunner
- Universitätsklinik für Strahlentherapie-Radioonkologie, Medizinische Universität Graz, Austria
| | | | | | - Thomas Mathias Gress
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie und Endokrinologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie Universitätsklinikum, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volker Heinemann
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik III, Klinikum der Universität München-Campus Grosshadern, München, Germany
| | | | - Marianne Sinn
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II Onkologie Hämatologie, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Waldemar Uhl
- Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, St Josef-Hospital, Bochum, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Siegel A, Friedman M, Feldman D, Krishnan K, Casey B, Pisuchpen N, Kambadakone A, Chung DC. Concordance of EUS and MRI/MRCP findings among high-risk individuals undergoing pancreatic cancer screening. Pancreatology 2022; 22:951-958. [PMID: 35995658 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2022.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Revised: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Surveillance with endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and MRI/magnetic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is recommended for individuals at high risk for pancreatic cancer. We sought to characterize the findings of these surveillance exams and define the level of concordance between these two modalities. METHODS 173 asymptomatic high-risk individuals (HRIs) meeting criteria for pancreatic cancer surveillance underwent EUS, MRI/MRCP, or both between 2008 and 2021. Clinical records were reviewed in all cases. RESULTS HRIs underwent an average of 3.6 ± 3.2 surveillance exams over a period of 3.3 ± 3.5 years. Abnormalities including intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs), solid lesions, and parenchymal irregularities were identified in 50.9% (n = 88). Four of these abnormalities (2.3%) had worrisome features, defined by cyst size, thickened/enhancing cyst walls, rapid growth rate, or change in main pancreatic duct diameter. All four worrisome lesions were seen on both MRI/MRCP and EUS. No pancreatic cancers were detected. Baseline EUS and MRI/MRCP exams were compared in 106 patients for concordance, and most (n = 66, 62.3%) were concordant. High levels of concordance were specifically observed for a dilated main pancreatic duct (p < 0.01) and cystic lesions >5 mm (p = 0.01). Among discordant cases, most (30/40; 75%) involved abnormal tissue heterogeneity seen primarily on EUS. None of these discordant lesions ultimately developed worrisome features. CONCLUSIONS Worrisome pancreatic lesions were uncommon in our high-risk pancreatic cancer population and were detected by both EUS and MRI/MRCP. There was mild discordance with respect to less worrisome findings, but these discrepancies were not associated with any adverse clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ava Siegel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Madeline Friedman
- Department of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Dan Feldman
- Department of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kumar Krishnan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Brenna Casey
- Department of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nisanard Pisuchpen
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Daniel C Chung
- Department of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Dbouk M, Katona BW, Brand RE, Chak A, Syngal S, Farrell JJ, Kastrinos F, Stoffel EM, Blackford AL, Rustgi AK, Dudley B, Lee LS, Chhoda A, Kwon R, Ginsberg GG, Klein AP, Kamel I, Hruban RH, He J, Shin EJ, Lennon AM, Canto MI, Goggins M. The Multicenter Cancer of Pancreas Screening Study: Impact on Stage and Survival. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:3257-3266. [PMID: 35704792 PMCID: PMC9553376 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.00298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Revised: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To report pancreas surveillance outcomes of high-risk individuals within the multicenter Cancer of Pancreas Screening-5 (CAPS5) study and to update outcomes of patients enrolled in prior CAPS studies. METHODS Individuals recommended for pancreas surveillance were prospectively enrolled into one of eight CAPS5 study centers between 2014 and 2021. The primary end point was the stage distribution of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) detected (stage I v higher-stage). Overall survival was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Of 1,461 high-risk individuals enrolled into CAPS5, 48.5% had a pathogenic variant in a PDAC-susceptibility gene. Ten patients were diagnosed with PDAC, one of whom was diagnosed with metastatic PDAC 4 years after dropping out of surveillance. Of the remaining nine, seven (77.8%) had a stage I PDAC (by surgical pathology) detected during surveillance; one had stage II, and one had stage III disease. Seven of these nine patients with PDAC were alive after a median follow-up of 2.6 years. Eight additional patients underwent surgical resection for worrisome lesions; three had high-grade and five had low-grade dysplasia in their resected specimens. In the entire CAPS cohort (CAPS1-5 studies, 1,731 patients), 26 PDAC cases have been diagnosed, 19 within surveillance, 57.9% of whom had stage I and 5.2% had stage IV disease. By contrast, six of the seven PDACs (85.7%) detected outside surveillance were stage IV. Five-year survival to date of the patients with a screen-detected PDAC is 73.3%, and median overall survival is 9.8 years, compared with 1.5 years for patients diagnosed with PDAC outside surveillance (hazard ratio [95% CI]; 0.13 [0.03 to 0.50], P = .003). CONCLUSION Most pancreatic cancers diagnosed within the CAPS high-risk cohort in the recent years have had stage I disease with long-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamad Dbouk
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Bryson W. Katona
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Randall E. Brand
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Amitabh Chak
- Division of Gastroenterology and Liver Disease, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | - Sapna Syngal
- Cancer Genetics and Prevention Division, Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Division of Gastroenterology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - James J. Farrell
- Yale Center for Pancreatic Disease, Section of Digestive Disease, Yale University, New Haven, CT
| | - Fay Kastrinos
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Elena M. Stoffel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Amanda L. Blackford
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Anil K. Rustgi
- Yale Center for Pancreatic Disease, Section of Digestive Disease, Yale University, New Haven, CT
| | - Beth Dudley
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Linda S. Lee
- Cancer Genetics and Prevention Division, Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Division of Gastroenterology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Ankit Chhoda
- Yale Center for Pancreatic Disease, Section of Digestive Disease, Yale University, New Haven, CT
| | - Richard Kwon
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Gregory G. Ginsberg
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Alison P. Klein
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Medicine, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ihab Kamel
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
- Bloomberg School of Public Health, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ralph H. Hruban
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jin He
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Radiology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Eun Ji Shin
- Department of Medicine, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Anne Marie Lennon
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Medicine, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
- Bloomberg School of Public Health, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Radiology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Marcia Irene Canto
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Medicine, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Michael Goggins
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Medicine, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Tanaka H, Tamura K, Abe T, Yoshida T, Macgregor-Das A, Dbouk M, Blackford AL, Borges M, Lennon AM, He J, Burkhart R, Canto MI, Goggins M. Serum Carboxypeptidase Activity and Genotype-Stratified CA19-9 to Detect Early-Stage Pancreatic Cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20:2267-2275.e2. [PMID: 34648951 PMCID: PMC9001752 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Revised: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Serum diagnostic markers of early-stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are needed, especially for stage I disease. As tumors grow and cause pancreatic atrophy, markers derived from pancreatic parenchyma such as serum carboxypeptidase A (CPA) activity lose diagnostic performance. We evaluated, with CA19-9, serum CPA as a marker of early pancreatic cancer. METHODS Serum CPA activity levels were measured in 345 controls undergoing pancreatic surveillance, divided into 2 sets, set 1 being used to establish a reference range. Variants within the CPA1 locus were sought for their association with pancreatic CPA1 expression to determine if such variants associated with serum CPA levels. A total of 190 patients with resectable PDAC were evaluated. RESULTS Among controls, those having 1 or more minor alleles of CPA1 variants rs6955723 or rs2284682 had significantly higher serum CPA levels than did those without (P = .001). None of the PDAC cases with pancreatic atrophy had an elevated CPA. Among 122 PDAC cases without atrophy, defining serum CPA diagnostic cutoffs by a subject's CPA1 variants yielded a diagnostic sensitivity of 18% at 99% specificity (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.7-26) (vs 11.1% sensitivity using a uniform diagnostic cutoff); combining CPA with variant-stratified CA19-9 yielded a sensitivity of 68.0% (95% CI, 59.0-76.2) vs 63.1% (95% CI, 53.9- 71.7) for CA19-9 alone; and among stage I PDAC cases, diagnostic sensitivity was 51.9% (95% CI, 31.9-71.3) vs 37.0% (95% CI, 19.4-57.6) for CA19-9 alone. In the validation control set, the variant-stratified diagnostic cutoff yielded a specificity of 98.2%. CONCLUSION Serum CPA activity has diagnostic utility before the emergence of pancreatic atrophy as a marker of localized PDAC, including stage I disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haruyoshi Tanaka
- Department of Pathology, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Koji Tamura
- Department of Pathology, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Toshiya Abe
- Department of Pathology, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Takeichi Yoshida
- Department of Pathology, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Anne Macgregor-Das
- Department of Pathology, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Mohamad Dbouk
- Department of Pathology, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Amanda L Blackford
- Department of Oncology, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Michael Borges
- Department of Surgery, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Anne Marie Lennon
- Department of Surgery, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Medicine, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Richard Burkhart
- Department of Surgery, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Marcia Irene Canto
- Department of Oncology, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Medicine, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Michael Goggins
- Department of Pathology, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Oncology, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Medicine, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Labiner AJ, Aronson A, Lucas AL. Screening and Surveillance for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma in High-Risk Individuals. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2022; 36:929-942. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2022.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
24
|
Saba H, Goggins M. Familial Pancreatic Cancer. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2022; 51:561-575. [PMID: 36153110 PMCID: PMC11095833 DOI: 10.1016/j.gtc.2022.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/21/2023]
Abstract
Individuals at increased risk of developing pancreatic cancer, including those with a significant family history of the disease and those with pancreatic cancer susceptibility gene variants, can benefit from pancreas surveillance. Most pancreatic cancers diagnosed during surveillance are early-stage and such patients can achieve long-term survival. Determining who should undergo pancreas surveillance is still a work-in-progress, but the main tools clinicians use to estimate an individual's risk of pancreatic cancer are patient's age, the extent of their family history of pancreatic cancer, and whether or not they have a pancreatic cancer susceptibility gene mutation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena Saba
- Departments of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, CRB2 351, 1550 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA
| | - Michael Goggins
- Departments of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, CRB2 351, 1550 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA; Departments of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, CRB2 351, 1550 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA; Departments of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, CRB2 351, 1550 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA; Bloomberg School of Public Health, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, CRB2 351, 1550 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Qian Y, Gong Y, Zou X, Liu Y, Chen Y, Wang R, Dai Z, Tasiheng Y, Lin X, Wang X, Luo G, Yu X, Cheng H, Liu C. Aberrant APOBEC3C expression induces characteristic genomic instability in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Oncogenesis 2022; 11:35. [PMID: 35750693 PMCID: PMC9232547 DOI: 10.1038/s41389-022-00411-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2021] [Revised: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a well-known lethal and heterogeneous disease. Apolipoprotein B mRNA-editing enzyme catalytic polypeptide-like (APOBEC) is an important mutagenic driver that has seldom been investigated in PDAC. Therefore, this study investigated the significance of APOBEC3C in PDAC. First, cytosine deamination-associated mutation signatures were identified in the PDAC cohorts from TCGA and Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC) datasets, and C > X-enriched kataegis regions were identified in the FUSCC cohort (12 to 27 counts per sample). Patients were stratified according to APOBEC3C expression, and high APOBEC3C expression was found to correlate with a higher motif enrichment score of 5’-CC-3’ and an elevated kataegis count within PCSK5 and NES genes. Second, we compared APOBEC expression in PDAC and normal pancreatic tissues and found that APOBEC3C was substantially upregulated in PDAC. APOBEC3C-overexpressing cell lines were generated to substantiate the effects of APOBEC3C on PDAC genome, including alterations in single-nucleotide variant (SNV) classes (higher proportion of C > T conversions) and the formation of kataegis regions (newly occurring kataegis regions detected in ACHE and MUC6 genes). Three different PDAC cohorts (FUSCC, TCGA, and QCMG) were analysed to evaluate the prognostic value of APOBEC3C, and APOBEC3C overexpression predicted shorter survival. Finally, the APOBEC3C overexpression correalted with the PDAC tumour microenvironment (TME) remodelling, APOBEC3C expression was associated with the invasion of CD4 + T lymphocytes and CD8 + T lymphocytes (cytotoxic T lymphocytes, CTLs), indicating enhanced immune activity and validating the practicality of APOBEC3C for guiding immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunzhen Qian
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 200032, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, 200032, Shanghai, China.,Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China
| | - Yitao Gong
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 200032, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, 200032, Shanghai, China.,Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China
| | - Xuan Zou
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 200032, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, 200032, Shanghai, China.,Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China
| | - Yu Liu
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 200032, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, 200032, Shanghai, China.,Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China
| | - Yusheng Chen
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 200032, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, 200032, Shanghai, China.,Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China
| | - Ruijie Wang
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 200032, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, 200032, Shanghai, China.,Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhengjie Dai
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 200032, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, 200032, Shanghai, China.,Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China
| | - Yesiboli Tasiheng
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 200032, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, 200032, Shanghai, China.,Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China
| | - Xuan Lin
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 200032, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, 200032, Shanghai, China.,Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China
| | - Xu Wang
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 200032, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, 200032, Shanghai, China.,Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China
| | - Guopei Luo
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 200032, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, 200032, Shanghai, China.,Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China
| | - Xianjun Yu
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 200032, Shanghai, China. .,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China. .,Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, 200032, Shanghai, China. .,Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China.
| | - He Cheng
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 200032, Shanghai, China. .,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China. .,Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, 200032, Shanghai, China. .,Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China.
| | - Chen Liu
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 200032, Shanghai, China. .,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China. .,Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, 200032, Shanghai, China. .,Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wang Y, Cuggia A, Chen YI, Parent J, Stanek A, Denroche RE, Zhang A, Grant RC, Domecq C, Golesworthy B, Shwaartz C, Borgida A, Holter S, Wilson JM, Chong G, O'Kane GM, Knox JJ, Fischer SE, Gallinger S, Gao ZH, Foulkes WD, Waschke KA, Zogopoulos G. Is Biannual Surveillance for Pancreatic Cancer Sufficient in Individuals With Genetic Syndromes or Familial Pancreatic Cancer? J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2022; 20:663-673.e12. [PMID: 35714671 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.7107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individuals with a family history of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PC) or with a germline mutation in a PC susceptibility gene are at increased risk of developing PC. These high-risk individuals (HRIs) may benefit from PC surveillance. METHODS A PC surveillance program was developed to evaluate the detection of premalignant lesions and early-stage PCs using biannual imaging and to determine whether locally advanced or metastatic PCs develop despite biannual surveillance. From January 2013 to April 2020, asymptomatic HRIs were enrolled and followed with alternating MRI and endoscopic ultrasound every 6 months. RESULTS Of 75 HRIs, 43 (57.3%) had a germline mutation in a PC susceptibility gene and 32 (42.7%) had a familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) pedigree. Branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMNs) were identified in 26 individuals (34.7%), but only 2 developed progressive lesions. One patient with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS) developed locally advanced PC arising from a BD-IPMN. Whole-genome sequencing of this patient's PC and of a second patient with PJS-associated PC from the same kindred revealed biallelic inactivation of STK11 in a KRAS-independent manner. A review of 3,853 patients from 2 PC registries identified an additional patient with PJS-associated PC. All 3 patients with PJS developed advanced PC consistent with the malignant transformation of an underlying BD-IPMN in <6 months. The other surveillance patient with a progressive lesion had FPC and underwent resection of a mixed-type IPMN that harbored polyclonal KRAS mutations. CONCLUSIONS PC surveillance identifies a high prevalence of BD-IPMNs in HRIs. Patients with PJS with BD-IPMNs may be at risk for accelerated malignant transformation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yifan Wang
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec
- Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Institute
| | - Adeline Cuggia
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec
- Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Institute
| | - Yen-I Chen
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and
| | - Josée Parent
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and
| | - Agatha Stanek
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec
| | | | - Amy Zhang
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Robert C Grant
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario
- Wallace McCain Centre for Pancreatic Cancer, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Céline Domecq
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec
- Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Institute
| | - Bryn Golesworthy
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec
- Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Institute
| | - Chaya Shwaartz
- Wallace McCain Centre for Pancreatic Cancer, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Ayelet Borgida
- Ontario Pancreas Cancer Study, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Spring Holter
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario
| | | | - George Chong
- Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, Sir Mortimer B. Davis-Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec
| | - Grainne M O'Kane
- Wallace McCain Centre for Pancreatic Cancer, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Jennifer J Knox
- Wallace McCain Centre for Pancreatic Cancer, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario
| | | | - Steven Gallinger
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario
- Wallace McCain Centre for Pancreatic Cancer, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario
- Ontario Pancreas Cancer Study, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario
| | | | - William D Foulkes
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec
- Department of Human Genetics, and
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - George Zogopoulos
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec
- Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Institute
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Overbeek KA, Levink IJM, Koopmann BDM, Harinck F, Konings ICAW, Ausems MGEM, Wagner A, Fockens P, van Eijck CH, Groot Koerkamp B, Busch ORC, Besselink MG, Bastiaansen BAJ, van Driel LMJW, Erler NS, Vleggaar FP, Poley JW, Cahen DL, van Hooft JE, Bruno MJ. Long-term yield of pancreatic cancer surveillance in high-risk individuals. Gut 2022; 71:1152-1160. [PMID: 33820756 PMCID: PMC9120399 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Revised: 03/20/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to determine the long-term yield of pancreatic cancer surveillance in hereditary predisposed high-risk individuals. DESIGN From 2006 to 2019, we prospectively enrolled asymptomatic individuals with an estimated 10% or greater lifetime risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) after obligatory evaluation by a clinical geneticist and genetic testing, and subjected them to annual surveillance with both endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and MRI/cholangiopancreatography (MRI/MRCP) at each visit. RESULTS 366 individuals (201 mutation-negative familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) kindreds and 165 PDAC susceptibility gene mutation carriers; mean age 54 years, SD 9.9) were followed for 63 months on average (SD 43.2). Ten individuals developed PDAC, of which four presented with a symptomatic interval carcinoma and six underwent resection. The cumulative PDAC incidence was 9.3% in the mutation carriers and 0% in the FPC kindreds (p<0.001). Median PDAC survival was 18 months (range 1-32). Surgery was performed in 17 individuals (4.6%), whose pathology revealed 6 PDACs (3 T1N0M0), 7 low-grade precursor lesions, 2 neuroendocrine tumours <2 cm, 1 autoimmune pancreatitis and in 1 individual no abnormality. There was no surgery-related mortality. EUS detected more solid lesions than MRI/MRCP (100% vs 22%, p<0.001), but less cystic lesions (42% vs 83%, p<0.001). CONCLUSION The diagnostic yield of PDAC was substantial in established high-risk mutation carriers, but non-existent in the mutation-negative proven FPC kindreds. Nevertheless, timely identification of resectable lesions proved challenging despite the concurrent use of two imaging modalities, with EUS outperforming MRI/MRCP. Overall, surveillance by imaging yields suboptimal results with a clear need for more sensitive diagnostic markers, including biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kasper A Overbeek
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris J M Levink
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Brechtje D M Koopmann
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Femme Harinck
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ingrid C A W Konings
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Margreet G E M Ausems
- Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anja Wagner
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Fockens
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Casper H van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier R C Busch
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Barbara A J Bastiaansen
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lydi M J W van Driel
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole S Erler
- Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frank P Vleggaar
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Werner Poley
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Djuna L Cahen
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marco J Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lin KW, Ang TL, Li JW. Role of artificial intelligence in early detection and screening for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Artif Intell Med Imaging 2022; 3:21-32. [DOI: 10.35711/aimi.v3.i2.21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Revised: 02/12/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains to be one of the deadliest malignancies in the world despite treatment advancement over the past few decades. Its low survival rates and poor prognosis can be attributed to ambiguity in recommendations for screening and late symptom onset, contributing to its late presentation. In the recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) as emerged as a field to aid in the process of clinical decision making. Considerable efforts have been made in the realm of AI to screen for and predict future development of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. This review discusses the use of AI in early detection and screening for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and factors which may limit its use in a clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth Weicong Lin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore 529889, Singapore
| | - Tiing Leong Ang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore 529889, Singapore
| | - James Weiquan Li
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore 529889, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Gonda TA, Farrell J, Wallace M, Khanna L, Janec E, Kwon R, Saunders M, Siddiqui UD, Brand R, Simeone DM. Standardization of EUS imaging and reporting in high-risk individuals of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: consensus statement of the Pancreatic Cancer Early Detection Consortium. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95:723-732.e7. [PMID: 34736932 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.10.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is an aggressive disease most often diagnosed after local progression or metastatic dissemination, precluding resection and resulting in a high mortality rate. For individuals with elevated personal risk of the development of pancreatic cancer, EUS is a frequently used advanced imaging and diagnostic modality. However, variability in the expertise and definition of EUS findings exists among gastroenterologists, as well as a lack of standardized reporting of relevant findings at the time of examination. Adoption of standardized EUS reporting, using a universally accepted and agreed on terminology, is needed. METHODS A consensus statement designed to create a standardized reporting template was authored by a multidisciplinary group of experts in pancreatic diseases that includes gastroenterologists, radiologists, surgeons, oncologists, and geneticists. This statement was developed using a modified Delphi process as part of the Pancreatic Cancer Early Detection Consortium, and >75% agreement was required to reach consensus. RESULTS We identified reporting elements and present standardized reporting templates for EUS indications, procedural data, EUS image capture, and descriptors of findings, tissue sampling, and postprocedural assessment of adequacy. CONCLUSIONS Adoption of this standardized EUS reporting template should improve consistency in clinical decision-making for individuals with elevated risk of pancreatic cancer by providing complete and accurate reporting of pancreatic abnormalities. Standardization will also help to facilitate research and clinical trial design by using clearly defined and consistent imaging descriptions, thus allowing for comparison of results across different centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamas A Gonda
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - James Farrell
- Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Michael Wallace
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Lauren Khanna
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Eileen Janec
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Richard Kwon
- Gastroenterology, Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Michael Saunders
- Gastroenterology, Internal Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Uzma D Siddiqui
- Gastroenterology, Internal Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Randall Brand
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Diane M Simeone
- Gastroenterology, Surgical Oncology, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Chhoda A, Vodusek Z, Wattamwar K, Mukherjee E, Gunderson C, Grimshaw A, Sharma A, Ahuja N, Kastrinos F, Farrell JJ. Late-Stage Pancreatic Cancer Detected During High-Risk Individual Surveillance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gastroenterology 2022; 162:786-798. [PMID: 34813861 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.11.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Revised: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Identification and resection of successful targets, that is, T1 N0M0 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and high-grade precursors during surveillance of high-risk individuals (HRIs) confers improved survival. Late-stage PDACs refer to T2-4 N0M0 and nodal or distant metastatic PDAC stages diagnosed during the follow-up phase of HRI surveillance. This study aimed to quantify late-stage PDACs during HRI surveillance and identify associated clinicoradiologic factors. METHODS A systematic search (PROSPERO:CRD42018117189) from Cochrane Library, Embase, Google Scholar, Medline, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was last performed on April 18, 2021. Only original HRI surveillance manuscripts that specified follow-up strategies were included, and studies with only baseline information were excluded. Cumulative incidences of advanced neoplasia: high-grade precursors and all PDACs, and surveillance-detected/interval late-stage PDACs were calculated through random-effects model. Incidence of late-stage PDACs underwent metaregression to identify association with HRI clinicoradiologic features. Publication bias was assessed through the funnel plot and Egger's regression line. RESULTS Thirteen original surveillance studies included 2169 HRIs followed over 7302.72 patient-years. Cumulative incidence of advanced neoplasia and late-stage PDACs was 3.3 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.6-7.4) and 1.7 (95% CI: 0.2-4.0) per 1000 patient-years, respectively. Late-stage PDACs lacked significant association with surveillance imaging, baseline pancreatic morphology, study location, genetic background, gender, or age. Limited information on diagnostic error, symptoms, timing of presentation, lesion site, and surveillance adherence precluded formal meta-analysis. CONCLUSION A sizeable proportion of late-stage PDACs were detected during follow-up. Their incidence lacked association with baseline clinicoradiologic features. Further causal investigation of stage-based outcomes is warranted for overall improvement in HRI surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ziga Vodusek
- Department of Internal Medicine, RWJ School of Medicine, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Kapil Wattamwar
- Department of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Eric Mukherjee
- Department of Dermatology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Craig Gunderson
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Alyssa Grimshaw
- Cushing/Whitney Medical Library, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Anup Sharma
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Nita Ahuja
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Fay Kastrinos
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - James J Farrell
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kohi S, Macgregor-Das A, Dbouk M, Yoshida T, Chuidian M, Abe T, Borges M, Lennon AM, Shin EJ, Canto MI, Goggins M. Alterations in the Duodenal Fluid Microbiome of Patients With Pancreatic Cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20:e196-e227. [PMID: 33161160 PMCID: PMC8120597 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2020] [Revised: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 11/01/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The tumor microbiome of patients with pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) includes bacteria normally present in the upper gastrointestinal tract. If the predominant source of intratumoral bacteria in patients with PDAC is retrograde migration from the duodenum, duodenal fluid could be a representative biospecimen for determining microbiome profiles of patients with PDAC or at risk of developing PDAC. METHODS We performed a case-control study comparing bacterial and fungal (16S and 18S rRNA) profiles of secretin-stimulated duodenal fluid collections from 308 patients undergoing duodenal endoscopy including 134 normal pancreas control subjects, 98 patients with pancreatic cyst(s) and 74 patients with PDAC. RESULTS Alterations in duodenal fluid microbiomes with diminished alpha diversity were significantly associated with age >70 and proton pump inhibitor use. Patients with PDAC had significantly decreased duodenal microbial alpha diversity compared with age-matched control subjects with normal pancreata and those with pancreatic cyst(s). There was evidence of enrichment of Bifidobacterium genera in the duodenal fluid of patients with PDAC compared with control subjects and those with pancreatic cyst(s). There were also enrichment of duodenal fluid Fusobacteria and Rothia bacteria among patients with PDAC with short-term survival. Duodenal fluid microbiome profiles were not significantly different between control subjects and patients with pancreatic cyst(s). CONCLUSION Patients with PDAC have alterations in their duodenal fluid microbiome profiles compared with patients with pancreatic cysts and those with normal pancreata. ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT02000089.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiro Kohi
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Anne Macgregor-Das
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Mohamad Dbouk
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Takeichi Yoshida
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Miguel Chuidian
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Toshiya Abe
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Michael Borges
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Anne Marie Lennon
- Department of Medicine, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Eun Ji Shin
- Department of Medicine, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD.,Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Marcia Irene Canto
- Department of Medicine, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD.,Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Michael Goggins
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Oncology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ueno S, Sudo T, Hirasawa A. ATM: Functions of ATM Kinase and Its Relevance to Hereditary Tumors. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:523. [PMID: 35008949 PMCID: PMC8745051 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23010523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) functions as a key initiator and coordinator of DNA damage and cellular stress responses. ATM signaling pathways contain many downstream targets that regulate multiple important cellular processes, including DNA damage repair, apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, oxidative sensing, and proliferation. Over the past few decades, associations between germline ATM pathogenic variants and cancer risk have been reported, particularly for breast and pancreatic cancers. In addition, given that ATM plays a critical role in repairing double-strand breaks, inhibiting other DNA repair pathways could be a synthetic lethal approach. Based on this rationale, several DNA damage response inhibitors are currently being tested in ATM-deficient cancers. In this review, we discuss the current knowledge related to the structure of the ATM gene, function of ATM kinase, clinical significance of ATM germline pathogenic variants in patients with hereditary cancers, and ongoing efforts to target ATM for the benefit of cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sayaka Ueno
- Section of Translational Research, Hyogo Cancer Center, 13-70 Kita-Oji-cho, Akashi-shi 673-8558, Japan;
- Department of Clinical Genomic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama 700-8558, Japan;
| | - Tamotsu Sudo
- Section of Translational Research, Hyogo Cancer Center, 13-70 Kita-Oji-cho, Akashi-shi 673-8558, Japan;
| | - Akira Hirasawa
- Department of Clinical Genomic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama 700-8558, Japan;
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Dudley B, Brand RE. Pancreatic Cancer Surveillance and Novel Strategies for Screening. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2022; 32:13-25. [PMID: 34798981 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2021.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Individuals with a genetic susceptibility to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) may benefit from surveillance to increase the likelihood of early detection. Currently, candidates for surveillance are identified based on genetic test results and family history of PDAC, and surveillance is accomplished through imaging of the pancreas (endoscopic ultrasound or MRI). Novel methods that incorporate personalized risk, biomarkers, and radiomics are being investigated in an attempt to improve identification of at-risk individuals and to increase detection of precursor and early-stage lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth Dudley
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 5200 Centre Avenue, Suite 409, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA
| | - Randall E Brand
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 5200 Centre Avenue, Suite 409, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Tang N, Dou X, You X, Liu G, Ou Z, Zai H. Comparisons of Outcomes Between Adolescent and Young Adult with Older Patients After Radical Resection of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma by Propensity Score Matching: A Single-Center Study. Cancer Manag Res 2021; 13:9063-9072. [PMID: 34938120 PMCID: PMC8686838 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s337687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Adolescent and young adult (AYA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) occurs in patients below 40 years old. Whether AYA patients have worse outcomes compared with older patients is still controversial. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of AYA patients and older patients after radical surgery for PDAC. Methods A single-center, retrospective, cohort study was conducted in patients who underwent radical surgery for PDAC in Xiangya Hospital Central South University from January 2007 to December 2019. The clinicopathological data and results of patients with PDAC were collected and analyzed retrospectively. They were divided into AYA group and older group based on age (<40, AYA group; ≥40, older group). Based on all the considered covariates except age, we estimated 1:2 case propensity score matching (PSM). Results A total of 1033 cases were enrolled, 46 cases (4.45%) in the AYA group. Both before and after PSM, the AYA patients have a higher preoperative CA19-9 than the older patients (P < 0.001) and (P < 0.001). Pathological results showed that AYA group had a higher microvascular invasion rate (P < 0.001 and P = 0.045) than older group. The median time of overall survival (OS) in AYA group and older group were 13 months (95% CI = 11.50-14.50) and 14 months (95% CI = 13.50-14.50), respectively. Additionally, AYA group have a worse 2-year OS rate than older group (8.70% vs 25.23%, P = 0.011 and 8.70% vs 25.00%, P = 0.023). According to the Log rank test, AYA group have a worse cumulative OS rate than older group (P = 0.002) and (P = 0.030), respectively. Conclusion PDAC might be more aggressive in AYA, and the cumulative OS after radical PDAC surgery in AYA patients is worse than that in older patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neng Tang
- Department of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan Province, People's Republic of China.,National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaolin Dou
- Department of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan Province, People's Republic of China.,National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, People's Republic of China
| | - Xing You
- Department of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan Province, People's Republic of China.,National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, People's Republic of China
| | - Guodong Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan Province, People's Republic of China.,National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhenglin Ou
- Department of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan Province, People's Republic of China.,National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, People's Republic of China
| | - Hongyan Zai
- Department of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan Province, People's Republic of China.,National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kawamoto M, Kohi S, Abe T, Dbouk M, Macgregor-Das A, Koi C, Song KB, Borges M, Sugimine R, Laheru D, Hruban RH, Roberts N, Klein AP, Goggins M. Endoplasmic stress-inducing variants in CPB1 and CPA1 and risk of pancreatic cancer: A case-control study and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer 2021; 150:1123-1133. [PMID: 34817877 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Revised: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Gene variants that encode pancreatic enzymes with impaired secretion can induce pancreatic acinar endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, cellular injury and pancreatitis. The role of such variants in pancreatic cancer risk has received little attention. We compared the prevalence of ER stress-inducing variants in CPA1 and CPB1 in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC cases), enrolled in the National Familial Pancreas Tumor Registry, to their prevalence in noncancer controls in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). Variants of unknown significance were expressed and variants with reduced secretion assessed for ER stress induction. In vitro assessments were compared with software predictions of variant function. Protein variant software was used to assess variants found in only one gnomAD control ("n-of-one" variants). A meta-analysis of prior PDAC case/control studies was also performed. Of the 1385 patients with PDAC, 0.65% were found to harbor an ER stress-inducing variant in CPA1 or CPB1, compared to 0.17% of the 64 026 controls (odds ratio [OR]: 3.80 [1.92-7.51], P = .0001). ER stress-inducing variants in the CPA1 gene were identified in 4 of 1385 PDAC cases vs 77 of 64 026 gnomAD controls (OR: 2.4 [0.88-6.58], P = .087), and variants in CPB1 were detected in 5 of 1385 cases vs 33 of 64 026 controls (OR: 7.02 [2.74-18.01], P = .0001). Meta-analysis demonstrated strong associations for pancreatic cancer and ER-stress inducing variants for both CPA1 (OR: 3.65 [1.58-8.39], P < .023) and CPB1 (OR: 9.51 [3.46-26.15], P < .001). Rare variants in CPB1 and CPA1 that induce ER stress are associated with increased odds of developing pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Makoto Kawamoto
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Shiro Kohi
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Toshiya Abe
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Mohamad Dbouk
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Anne Macgregor-Das
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Chiho Koi
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ki-Byung Song
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Michael Borges
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ryo Sugimine
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Daniel Laheru
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ralph H Hruban
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Nicholas Roberts
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Alison P Klein
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Bloomberg School of Public Health, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Michael Goggins
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Medicine, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Zhang Z, Li H, Deng Y, Schuck K, Raulefs S, Maeritz N, Yu Y, Hechler T, Pahl A, Fernández-Sáiz V, Wan Y, Wang G, Engleitner T, Öllinger R, Rad R, Reichert M, Diakopoulos KN, Weber V, Li J, Shen S, Zou X, Kleeff J, Mihaljevic A, Michalski CW, Algül H, Friess H, Kong B. AGR2-Dependent Nuclear Import of RNA Polymerase II Constitutes a Specific Target of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma in the Context of Wild-Type p53. Gastroenterology 2021; 161:1601-1614.e23. [PMID: 34303658 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.07.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Revised: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 07/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Promoted by pancreatitis, oncogenic KrasG12D triggers acinar cells' neoplastic transformation through acinar-to-ductal metaplasia (ADM) and pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Anterior gradient 2 (Agr2), a known inhibitor of p53, is detected at early stage of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) development. RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) is a key nuclear enzyme; regulation of its nuclear localization in mammalian cells represents a potential therapeutic target. METHODS A mouse model of inflammation-accelerated KrasG12D-driven ADM and pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia development was used. Pancreas-specific Agr2 ablation was performed to access its role in pancreatic carcinogenesis. Hydrophobic hexapeptides loaded in liposomes were developed to disrupt Agr2-RNAPII complex. RESULTS We found that Agr2 is up-regulated in ADM-to-pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia transition in inflammation and KrasG12D-driven early pancreatic carcinogenesis. Genetic ablation of Agr2 specifically blocks this metaplastic-to-neoplastic process. Mechanistically, Agr2 directs the nuclear import of RNAPII via its C-terminal nuclear localization signal, undermining the ATR-dependent p53 activation in ADM lesions. Because Agr2 binds to the largest subunit of RNAPII in a peptide motif-dependent manner, we developed a hexapeptide to interfere with the nuclear import of RNAPII by competitively disrupting the Agr2-RNAPII complex. This novel hexapeptide leads to dysfunction of RNAPII with concomitant activation of DNA damage response in early neoplastic lesions; hence, it dramatically compromises PDAC initiation in vivo. Moreover, the hexapeptide sensitizes PDAC cells and patient-derived organoids harboring wild-type p53 to RNAPII inhibitors and first-line chemotherapeutic agents in vivo. Of note, this therapeutic effect is efficient across various cancer types. CONCLUSIONS Agr2 is identified as a novel adaptor protein for nuclear import of RNAPII in mammalian cells. Also, we provide genetic evidence defining Agr2-dependent nuclear import of RNAPII as a pharmaceutically accessible target for prevention and treatment in PDAC in the context of wild-type p53.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Active Transport, Cell Nucleus
- Animals
- Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology
- Carcinoma in Situ/drug therapy
- Carcinoma in Situ/enzymology
- Carcinoma in Situ/genetics
- Carcinoma in Situ/pathology
- Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/enzymology
- Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/genetics
- Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathology
- Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/genetics
- Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/metabolism
- Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/pathology
- Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
- Metaplasia
- Mice, Inbred C57BL
- Mice, Inbred NOD
- Mice, Knockout
- Mice, SCID
- Mucoproteins/genetics
- Mucoproteins/metabolism
- Mutation
- Oligopeptides/pharmacology
- Oncogene Proteins/genetics
- Oncogene Proteins/metabolism
- Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Pancreatic Neoplasms/enzymology
- Pancreatic Neoplasms/genetics
- Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology
- Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)/genetics
- RNA Polymerase II/genetics
- RNA Polymerase II/metabolism
- Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/genetics
- Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/metabolism
- Mice
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiheng Zhang
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Hongzhen Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University, Medical School, Nanjing, China; Department of Surgery, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Yibin Deng
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Neuropsychiatric Diseases, and College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Kathleen Schuck
- Department of Surgery, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Susanne Raulefs
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nadja Maeritz
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Yuanyuan Yu
- Department of Surgery, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Pahl
- Heidelberg Pharma Research GmbH, Ladenburg, Germany
| | - Vanesa Fernández-Sáiz
- Department of Medicine III, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; Center for Translational Cancer Research, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Yuan Wan
- The Pq Laboratory of Micro/Nano BiomeDx, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Binghamton University, State University of New York, Binghamton, New York
| | - Guosheng Wang
- The Pq Laboratory of Micro/Nano BiomeDx, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Binghamton University, State University of New York, Binghamton, New York
| | - Thomas Engleitner
- Center for Translational Cancer Research, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; Department of Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Rupert Öllinger
- Center for Translational Cancer Research, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; Department of Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium at the partner site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Roland Rad
- Center for Translational Cancer Research, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; Department of Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium at the partner site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Reichert
- Department of Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Verena Weber
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jingjing Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University, Medical School, Nanjing, China
| | - Shanshan Shen
- Department of Gastroenterology, the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University, Medical School, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiaoping Zou
- Department of Gastroenterology, the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University, Medical School, Nanjing, China
| | - Jörg Kleeff
- Department of Visceral, Vascular and Endocrine Surgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Andre Mihaljevic
- Department of Surgery, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | | | - Hana Algül
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Helmut Friess
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Bo Kong
- Department of Gastroenterology, the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University, Medical School, Nanjing, China; Department of Surgery, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Biller LH, Wolpin BM, Goggins M. Inherited Pancreatic Cancer Syndromes and High-Risk Screening. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2021; 30:773-786. [PMID: 34511196 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2021.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is the third leading cause of cancer death in the United States, with a 5-year survival rate of 9%. Individuals with inherited pancreatic cancer syndromes are at an increased risk for developing pancreatic cancer and may benefit from pancreatic cancer surveillance with the goal to detect and intervene on early-stage cancer or high-risk precursor lesions. Given the screening implications for family members and therapeutic implications for probands, all patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer are recommended to undergo germline genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leah H Biller
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, USA. https://twitter.com/leahbillermd
| | - Brian M Wolpin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Michael Goggins
- Johns Hopkins University, 1550 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is associated with both family and hereditary cancer syndromes. Multigene panel testing for pancreatic cancer detected the germline variants BRCA1/2, PALB2, ATM, TP53, MLH1, STK11/LKB1, APC, CDKN2A, and SPINK1/PRSS1 as high-risk genes. A latest genome-wide association study revealed the common, but low-risk germline variants in pancreatic cancer patients. Active pancreatic surveillance using magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopic ultrasound is recommended for high-risk individuals who have a family history of pancreatic cancer or harbor these germline pathogenic variants to improve the detection rate and prognosis of pancreatic cancer. Since poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor has been shown to be effective in improving the prognosis of BRCA-positive pancreatic cancer as well as hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, PARP inhibitor therapy is currently being applied as precision medicine to pancreatic cancer patients harboring the BRCA1/2 germline variant. This review highlights the importance of surveillance for germline pathogenic variants in pancreatic cancer and is expected to lead to improvements in the diagnosis and prevention of pancreatic cancer as well as facilitate the development of effective therapeutic strategies and precision medicine.
Collapse
|
39
|
Trikudanathan G, Lou E, Maitra A, Majumder S. Early detection of pancreatic cancer: current state and future opportunities. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2021; 37:532-538. [PMID: 34387255 PMCID: PMC8494382 DOI: 10.1097/mog.0000000000000770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is third leading cause of cancer death in the United States, a lethal disease with no screening strategy. Although diagnosis at an early stage is associated with improved survival, clinical detection of PDAC is typically at an advanced symptomatic stage when best in class therapies have limited impact on survival. RECENT FINDINGS In recent years this status quo has been challenged by the identification of novel risk factors, molecular markers of early-stage disease and innovations in pancreatic imaging. There is now expert consensus that screening may be pursued in a cohort of individuals with increased likelihood of developing PDAC based on genetic and familial risk. SUMMARY The current review summarizes the known risk factors of PDAC, current knowledge and recent observations pertinent to early detection of PDAC in these risk groups and outlines future approaches that will potentially advance the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guru Trikudanathan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - Emil Lou
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - Anirban Maitra
- Sheikh Ahmed Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Kimura H, Klein AP, Hruban RH, Roberts NJ. The Role of Inherited Pathogenic CDKN2A Variants in Susceptibility to Pancreatic Cancer. Pancreas 2021; 50:1123-1130. [PMID: 34714275 PMCID: PMC8562885 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000001888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT CDKN2A is cell cycle negative regulator, and the role of CDKN2A in the development of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, which continues to be a lethal cancer, is well-established. Somatic loss of CDKN2A is considered one of the major drivers of pancreatic tumorigenesis. CDKN2A gene is one of the pancreatic cancer susceptibility gene; in addition to melanoma, pathogenic germline CDKN2A variants have been identified in up to 3.3% patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma depending on family history of disease. Carriers of a known pathogenic germline CDKN2A variant have up to a 12.3-fold increased risk of developing pancreatic cancer. Recently, several studies have demonstrated the benefit of clinical surveillance in patients with pathogenic germline CDKN2A variants. Therefore, identification of patients with a pathogenic germline CDKN2A variant is important for screening of at-risk relatives for pancreatic cancer. It has the potential to lead to the detection of early, potentially curable pancreatic cancer and precursor neoplasms, and reduce mortality. Furthermore, patients with a germline pathogenic CDKN2A variant and somatic loss of CDKN2A may benefit in the future from treatment with targeted therapies, such as a CDK4/6 inhibitor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hirokazu Kimura
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Pathology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Alison P. Klein
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Pathology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Oncology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Epidemiology, the Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ralph H. Hruban
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Pathology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Oncology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Nicholas J. Roberts
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Pathology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Oncology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Murali K, Dwarte TM, Nikfarjam M, Tucker KM, Vaughan RB, Efthymiou M, Collins A, Spigelman AD, Salmon L, Johns AL, Williams DB, Delatycki MB, John T, Stoita A. Significant detection of new germline pathogenic variants in Australian Pancreatic Cancer Screening Program participants. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2021; 19:33. [PMID: 34399810 PMCID: PMC8365963 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-021-00190-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Australian Pancreatic Cancer Screening Program (APCSP) offers endoscopic ultrasound surveillance for individuals at increased risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with all participants requiring assessment by a Familial Cancer Service before or after study enrolment. METHODS Individuals aged 40-80 years (or 10 years younger than the earliest PDAC diagnosis) were eligible for APCSP study entry if they had 1) ≥ two blood relatives with PDAC (at least one of first-degree association); 2) a clinical or genetic diagnosis of Hereditary Pancreatitis or Peutz-Jeghers syndrome irrespective of PDAC family history; or 3) a known PDAC predisposition germline pathogenic variant (BRCA2, PALB2, CDKN2A, or Lynch syndrome) with ≥one PDAC-affected first- or second-degree relative. Retrospective medical record review was conducted for APCSP participants enrolled at the participating Australian hospitals from January 2011 to December 2019. We audited the genetic investigations offered by multiple Familial Cancer Services who assessed APCSP participants according to national guidelines, local clinical protocol and/or the availability of external research-funded testing, and the subsequent findings. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel. RESULTS Of 189 kindreds (285 participants), 50 kindreds (71 participants) had a known germline pathogenic variant at enrolment (BRCA2 n = 35, PALB2 n = 6, CDKN2A n = 3, STK11 n = 3, PRSS1 n = 2, MLH1 n = 1). Forty-eight of 136 (35%) kindreds with no known germline pathogenic variant were offered mutation analysis; 89% was clinic-funded, with increasing self-funded testing since 2016. The relatively low rates of genetic testing performed reflects initial strict criteria for clinic-funded genetic testing. New germline pathogenic variants were detected in five kindreds (10.4%) after study enrolment (BRCA2 n = 3 kindreds, PALB2 n = 1, CDKN2A n = 1). Of note, only eight kindreds were reassessed by a Familial Cancer Service since enrolment, with a further 21 kindreds identified as being suitable for reassessment. CONCLUSION Germline pathogenic variants associated with PDAC were seen in 29.1% of our high-risk cohort (55/189 kindreds; 82/285 participants). Importantly, 10.4% of kindreds offered genetic testing were newly identified as having germline pathogenic variants, with majority being BRCA2. As genetic testing standards evolve rapidly in PDAC, 5-yearly reassessment of high-risk individuals by Familial Cancer Services is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krithika Murali
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia
| | - Tanya M Dwarte
- Australian Pancreatic Cancer Genome Initiative, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia
- Hereditary Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia
| | - Mehrdad Nikfarjam
- Division of Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia
| | - Katherine M Tucker
- Hereditary Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia
- University of New South Wales, St Vincent's Clinical School and Prince of Wales Clinical School, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia
| | - Rhys B Vaughan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia
| | - Marios Efthymiou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia
| | - Allison Collins
- Clinical Trials Unit, Olivia Newton John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia
| | - Allan D Spigelman
- University of New South Wales, St Vincent's Clinical School and Prince of Wales Clinical School, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia
- Cancer Genetics Unit, The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia
| | - Lucinda Salmon
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia
| | - Amber L Johns
- Australian Pancreatic Cancer Genome Initiative, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia
| | - David B Williams
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia
| | - Martin B Delatycki
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia
| | - Thomas John
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC, 3000, Australia
| | - Alina Stoita
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia.
- University of New South Wales, St Vincent's Clinical School and Prince of Wales Clinical School, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Roberts NJ, Grant RC, Gallinger S, Klein AP. Germline sequence analysis of RABL3 in a large series of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients reveals no evidence of deleterious variants. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2021; 60:559-564. [PMID: 33724601 PMCID: PMC8251898 DOI: 10.1002/gcc.22947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Revised: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a lethal disease with a 5-year survival rate of less than 10%. Individuals with a pathogenic germline variant in a pancreatic cancer susceptibility gene are at an increased risk of developing pancreatic cancer. Understanding the inherited genetic basis of pancreatic tumor development provides a unique opportunity to improve patient care and outcomes. For example, relatives of a patients with PDAC who have a pathogenic germline variant in a pancreatic cancer susceptibility gene are eligible for disease surveillance where cancers may be detected early, and 5-year survival greatly improved. Furthermore, for some patients with PDAC and a pathogenic germline variant in a pancreatic cancer susceptibility gene, their tumors may be susceptible to specific anti-cancer therapies. Recently, RABL3 was identified as a pancreatic cancer susceptibility gene. To validate these findings and inform clinical translation, we determined the prevalence of deleterious RABL3 variants in a large cohort of 1037 patients with PDAC that had undergone either whole genome or whole exome germline sequencing. We identified two synonymous variants and four missense variants classified as variants of unknown significance. We found no pathogenic RABL3 variants, indicating that the maximum prevalence of such variants in patients with PDAC is less than 0.36% (minor allele frequency 0, 97.5% one-sided confidence interval: 0-0.0036). This finding has important implications for germline genetic testing of patients with PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas J. Roberts
- Department of PathologyThe Johns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research CenterThe Johns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
- Department of OncologyThe Johns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Robert C. Grant
- Divison of Medical Oncology and HematologyPrincess Margaret Hospital Cancer CentreTorontoOntarioCanada
- PanCuRx Translational Research InitiativeOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Steven Gallinger
- PanCuRx Translational Research InitiativeOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Alison P. Klein
- Department of PathologyThe Johns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research CenterThe Johns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
- Department of OncologyThe Johns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
- Department of EpidemiologyThe Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Wang S, Zheng Y, Yang F, Zhu L, Zhu XQ, Wang ZF, Wu XL, Zhou CH, Yan JY, Hu BY, Kong B, Fu DL, Bruns C, Zhao Y, Qin LX, Dong QZ. The molecular biology of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: translational challenges and clinical perspectives. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2021; 6:249. [PMID: 34219130 PMCID: PMC8255319 DOI: 10.1038/s41392-021-00659-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 112] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Revised: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is an increasingly common cause of cancer mortality with a tight correspondence between disease mortality and incidence. Furthermore, it is usually diagnosed at an advanced stage with a very dismal prognosis. Due to the high heterogeneity, metabolic reprogramming, and dense stromal environment associated with pancreatic cancer, patients benefit little from current conventional therapy. Recent insight into the biology and genetics of pancreatic cancer has supported its molecular classification, thus expanding clinical therapeutic options. In this review, we summarize how the biological features of pancreatic cancer and its metabolic reprogramming as well as the tumor microenvironment regulate its development and progression. We further discuss potential biomarkers for pancreatic cancer diagnosis, prediction, and surveillance based on novel liquid biopsies. We also outline recent advances in defining pancreatic cancer subtypes and subtype-specific therapeutic responses and current preclinical therapeutic models. Finally, we discuss prospects and challenges in the clinical development of pancreatic cancer therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shun Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Cancer Metastasis Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yan Zheng
- Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Cancer Metastasis Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Feng Yang
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreatic Disease Institute, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Le Zhu
- Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Cancer Metastasis Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao-Qiang Zhu
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Zhe-Fang Wang
- General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Xiao-Lin Wu
- General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Cheng-Hui Zhou
- General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jia-Yan Yan
- General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Bei-Yuan Hu
- Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Cancer Metastasis Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Bo Kong
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - De-Liang Fu
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreatic Disease Institute, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Christiane Bruns
- General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Yue Zhao
- General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Lun-Xiu Qin
- Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Cancer Metastasis Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Qiong-Zhu Dong
- Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Cancer Metastasis Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
- Key laboratory of whole-period monitoring and precise intervention of digestive cancer, Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (SMHC), Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Combinations of Low-Frequency Genetic Variants Might Predispose to Familial Pancreatic Cancer. J Pers Med 2021; 11:jpm11070631. [PMID: 34357098 PMCID: PMC8305658 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11070631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Revised: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) is an established but rare inherited tumor syndrome that accounts for approximately 5% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cases. No major causative gene defect has yet been identified, but germline mutations in predisposition genes BRCA1/2, CDKN2A and PALB2 could be detected in 10–15% of analyzed families. Thus, the genetic basis of disease susceptibility in the majority of FPC families remains unknown. In an attempt to identify new candidate genes, we performed whole-genome sequencing on affected patients from 15 FPC families, without detecting BRCA1/2, CDKN2A or PALB2 mutations, using an Illumina based platform. Annotations from CADD, PolyPhen-2, SIFT, Mutation Taster and PROVEAN were used to assess the potential impact of a variant on the function of a gene. Variants that did not segregate with pancreatic disease in respective families were excluded. Potential predisposing candidate genes ATM, SUFU, DAB1, POLQ, FGFBP3, MAP3K3 and ACAD9 were identified in 7 of 15 families. All identified gene mutations segregated with pancreatic disease, but sometimes with incomplete penetrance. An analysis of up to 46 additional FPC families revealed that the identified gene mutations appeared to be unique in most cases, despite a potentially deleterious ACAD9 Ala326Thr germline variant, which occurred in 4 (8.7%) of 46 FPC families. Notably, affected PDAC patients within a family carried identical germline mutations in up to three different genes, e.g., DAB1, POLQ and FGFBP3. These results support the hypothesis that FPC is a highly heterogeneous polygenetic disease caused by low-frequency or rare variants.
Collapse
|
45
|
Blackford AL, Canto MI, Klein AP, Hruban RH, Goggins M. Recent Trends in the Incidence and Survival of Stage 1A Pancreatic Cancer: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 112:1162-1169. [PMID: 31958122 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djaa004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2019] [Revised: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 01/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rapid access to pancreatic imaging and regular pancreatic surveillance may help identify stage I pancreatic cancer. We investigated recent trends in the stage of newly diagnosed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDACs), age at diagnosis, and survival. METHODS Trends in age-adjusted incidence of stage IA PDAC between 2004 and 2016 were determined from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. All tests were two-sided. RESULTS The incidence of stage IA PDAC cases diagnosed increased statistically significantly from 2004 to 2016 (annual percent change = 14.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 11.4 to 17.7; P < .001). During the study period, average age at diagnosis for stage IA and IB casesAQ3 declined by 3.5 years (95% CI = 1.2 to 5.9; P = .004) and 5.5 years (95% CI = 3.4 to 7.6; P < .001), whereas average age increased for higher-stage cases (by 0.6 to 1.4 years). Among stage IA cases, the proportion of blacks was smaller (10.2% vs 12.5%), and the proportion of other non-Caucasians was higher compared with higher-stage cases (11.9% vs 8.4%; P < .001). Stage IA cases were more likely to carry insurance (vs Medicaid or none) than higher-stage cases (cases aged younger than 65 years; odds ratio = 2.45, 95% CI = 1.96 to 3.06; P < .001). The 5-year overall survival for stage IA PDAC improved from 44.7% (95% CI = 31.4 to 63.7) in 2004 to 83.7% (95% CI = 78.6% to 89.2%) in 2012; 10-year survival improved from 36.7% (95% CI = 24.1 to 55.8) in 2004 to 49.0% (95% CI = 37.2% to 64.6%) in 2007. CONCLUSIONS In recent years, the proportion of patients diagnosed with stage IA PDAC has increased, their average age at diagnosis has decreased, and their overall survival has improved. These trends may be the result of improved early diagnosis and early detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda L Blackford
- Affiliations of authors: Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Marcia Irene Canto
- Affiliations of authors: Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Medicine, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alison P Klein
- Affiliations of authors: Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Departments of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ralph H Hruban
- Affiliations of authors: Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Departments of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael Goggins
- Affiliations of authors: Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Medicine, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Departments of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kenner B, Chari ST, Kelsen D, Klimstra DS, Pandol SJ, Rosenthal M, Rustgi AK, Taylor JA, Yala A, Abul-Husn N, Andersen DK, Bernstein D, Brunak S, Canto MI, Eldar YC, Fishman EK, Fleshman J, Go VLW, Holt JM, Field B, Goldberg A, Hoos W, Iacobuzio-Donahue C, Li D, Lidgard G, Maitra A, Matrisian LM, Poblete S, Rothschild L, Sander C, Schwartz LH, Shalit U, Srivastava S, Wolpin B. Artificial Intelligence and Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer: 2020 Summative Review. Pancreas 2021; 50:251-279. [PMID: 33835956 PMCID: PMC8041569 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000001762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Despite considerable research efforts, pancreatic cancer is associated with a dire prognosis and a 5-year survival rate of only 10%. Early symptoms of the disease are mostly nonspecific. The premise of improved survival through early detection is that more individuals will benefit from potentially curative treatment. Artificial intelligence (AI) methodology has emerged as a successful tool for risk stratification and identification in general health care. In response to the maturity of AI, Kenner Family Research Fund conducted the 2020 AI and Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer Virtual Summit (www.pdac-virtualsummit.org) in conjunction with the American Pancreatic Association, with a focus on the potential of AI to advance early detection efforts in this disease. This comprehensive presummit article was prepared based on information provided by each of the interdisciplinary participants on one of the 5 following topics: Progress, Problems, and Prospects for Early Detection; AI and Machine Learning; AI and Pancreatic Cancer-Current Efforts; Collaborative Opportunities; and Moving Forward-Reflections from Government, Industry, and Advocacy. The outcome from the robust Summit conversations, to be presented in a future white paper, indicate that significant progress must be the result of strategic collaboration among investigators and institutions from multidisciplinary backgrounds, supported by committed funders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Suresh T. Chari
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - David S. Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Stephen J. Pandol
- Basic and Translational Pancreas Research Program, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Anil K. Rustgi
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Adam Yala
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
- Jameel Clinic, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
| | - Noura Abul-Husn
- Division of Genomic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Dana K. Andersen
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Søren Brunak
- Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marcia Irene Canto
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Yonina C. Eldar
- Department of Math and Computer Science, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Elliot K. Fishman
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Vay Liang W. Go
- UCLA Center for Excellence in Pancreatic Diseases, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Bruce Field
- From the Kenner Family Research Fund, New York, NY
| | - Ann Goldberg
- From the Kenner Family Research Fund, New York, NY
| | | | - Christine Iacobuzio-Donahue
- David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Debiao Li
- Biomedical Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Anirban Maitra
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | - Lawrence H. Schwartz
- Department of Radiology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Uri Shalit
- Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Management, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Sudhir Srivastava
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Brian Wolpin
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Majumder S, Taylor WR, Foote PH, Berger CK, Wu CW, Mahoney DW, Bamlet WR, Burger KN, Postier N, de la Fuente J, Doering KA, Lidgard GP, Allawi HT, Petersen GM, Chari ST, Ahlquist DA, Kisiel JB. High Detection Rates of Pancreatic Cancer Across Stages by Plasma Assay of Novel Methylated DNA Markers and CA19-9. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:2523-2532. [PMID: 33593879 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-0235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2020] [Revised: 09/03/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We have previously identified tissue methylated DNA markers (MDMs) associated with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In this case-control study, we aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of plasma MDMs for PDAC. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Thirteen MDMs (GRIN2D, CD1D, ZNF781, FER1L4, RYR2, CLEC11A, AK055957, LRRC4, GH05J042948, HOXA1, PRKCB, SHISA9, and NTRK3) were identified on the basis of selection criteria applied to results of prior tissue experiments and assays were optimized in plasma. Next, 340 plasma samples (170 PDAC cases and 170 controls) were assayed using target enrichment long-probe quantitative amplified signal method. Initially, 120 advanced-stage PDAC cases and 120 healthy controls were used to train a prediction algorithm at 97.5% specificity using random forest modeling. Subsequently, the locked algorithm derived from the training set was applied to an independent blinded test set of 50 early-stage PDAC cases and 50 controls. Finally, data from all 340 patients were combined, and cross-validated. RESULTS The cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the training set was 0.93 (0.89-0.96) for the MDM panel alone, 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.96) for carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) alone, and 0.99 (0.98-1) for the combined MDM-CA19-9 panel. In the test set of early-stage PDAC, the AUC for MDMs alone was 0.84 (0.76-0.92), CA19-9 alone was 0.87 (0.79-0.94), and combined MDM-CA19-9 panel was 0.90 (0.84-0.97) significantly better compared with either MDMs alone or CA19-9 alone (P = 0.0382 and 0.0490, respectively). At a preset specificity of 97.5%, the sensitivity for the combined panel in the test set was 80% (28%-99%) for stage I disease and 82% (68%-92%) for stage II disease. Using the combined datasets, the cross-validated AUC was 0.9 (0.86-0.94) for the MDM panel alone and 0.89 for CA19-9 alone (0.84-0.93) versus 0.97 (0.94-0.99) for the combined MDM-CA19-9 panel (P ≤ 0.0001). Overall, cross-validated sensitivity of MDM-CA19-9 panel was 92% (83%-98%), with an observed specificity of 92% at the preset specificity of 97.5%. CONCLUSIONS Plasma MDMs in combination with CA19-9 detect PDAC with significantly higher accuracy compared with either biomarker individually.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shounak Majumder
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| | - William R Taylor
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Patrick H Foote
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Calise K Berger
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Chung Wah Wu
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Douglas W Mahoney
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - William R Bamlet
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Kelli N Burger
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Neil Postier
- Department of Chemistry, Wheaton College, Wheaton, Illinois
| | - Jaime de la Fuente
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Karen A Doering
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | - Gloria M Petersen
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Suresh T Chari
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - David A Ahlquist
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - John B Kisiel
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Wagner A, Aretz S, Auranen A, Bruno MJ, Cavestro GM, Crosbie EJ, Goverde A, Jelsig AM, Latchford AR, van Leerdam ME, Lepisto AH, Puzzono M, Winship I, Zuber V, Möslein G. The Management of Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome: European Hereditary Tumour Group (EHTG) Guideline. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10030473. [PMID: 33513864 PMCID: PMC7865862 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10030473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2020] [Revised: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The scientific data to guide the management of Peutz–Jeghers syndrome (PJS) are sparse. The available evidence has been reviewed and discussed by diverse medical specialists in the field of PJS to update the previous guideline from 2010 and formulate a revised practical guideline for colleagues managing PJS patients. Methods: Literature searches were performed using MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane. Evidence levels and recommendation strengths were assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). A Delphi process was followed, with consensus being reached when ≥80% of the voting guideline committee members agreed. Recommendations and statements: The only recent guidelines available were for gastrointestinal and pancreatic management. These were reviewed and endorsed after confirming that no more recent relevant papers had been published. Literature searches were performed for additional questions and yielded a variable number of relevant papers depending on the subject addressed. Additional recommendations and statements were formulated. Conclusions: A decade on, the evidence base for recommendations remains poor, and collaborative studies are required to provide better data about this rare condition. Within these restrictions, multisystem, clinical management recommendations for PJS have been formulated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Wagner
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3000CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +31-10-7036913
| | - Stefan Aretz
- Institute of Human Genetics, Medical Faculty, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany;
- National Center for Hereditary Tumor Syndromes, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Annika Auranen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere University Hospital, 33520 Tampere, Finland;
| | - Marco J. Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3000CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Giulia M. Cavestro
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (G.M.C.); (M.P.)
| | - Emma J. Crosbie
- Department of Gynecology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9WL, UK;
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, St Mary’s Hospital, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - Anne Goverde
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3000CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Anne Marie Jelsig
- Department of Clinical Genetics, University Hospital of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark;
| | - Andrew R. Latchford
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK;
- Polyposis Registry, St. Marks Hospital, London HA1 3UJ, UK
| | - Monique E. van Leerdam
- Department of Gastro-intestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1006BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300RC Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Anna H. Lepisto
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Helsinki, 00029 Helsinki, Finland;
| | - Marta Puzzono
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (G.M.C.); (M.P.)
| | - Ingrid Winship
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3052, Australia;
| | - Veronica Zuber
- Breast Surgery Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy;
| | - Gabriela Möslein
- Center for Hereditary Tumors, Ev. BETHESDA Khs. Duisburg, Academic Hospital University of Düsseldorf, 47053 Duisburg, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Bar-Mashiah A, Aronson A, Naparst M, DiMaio CJ, Lucas AL. Elevated hemoglobin A1c is associated with the presence of pancreatic cysts in a high-risk pancreatic surveillance program. BMC Gastroenterol 2020; 20:161. [PMID: 32460749 PMCID: PMC7254640 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-020-01308-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2019] [Accepted: 05/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Emerging evidence demonstrates that surveillance of individuals at high-risk (HRIs) of developing pancreatic adenocarcinoma allows for identification and treatment of resectable tumors with improved survival. Population-based data suggest that hyperglycemia may be present up to three years before the development of pancreatic cancer. We investigated whether elevated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is associated with the development of pancreatic cysts in a pancreatic surveillance program. Methods We performed a retrospective study of HRIs who underwent pancreatic surveillance at a single institution between May 2013 and March 2019, according to published criteria. We collected demographic information, clinical data including HbA1c, and imaging results. We compared data using univariable and multivariable analyses. Our primary outcome was the presence of pancreatic cysts on initial surveillance in patients with elevated HbA1c. Results Ninety-eight patients underwent surveillance imaging via EUS or MRCP and seventy-four patients met inclusion criteria. Thirty patients were found to have cysts on initial imaging. Older age (p < 0.01) and HbA1c in the prediabetic range or higher (p = 0.01) were associated with the presence of cysts or solid lesions on univariable analysis. After controlling for confounders, age (aOR 9.08, 95% CI 2.29–36.10), and HbA1c > 5.7% (aOR 5.82, 95% CI 1.50–22.54) remained associated with presence of cysts and solid lesions in HRIs. In patients with cysts or solid lesions there was a strong association between increased age and elevated HbA1c (p < 0.01). Conclusion HRIs with elevated HbA1c were more likely to have pancreatic cysts compared to individuals with lower HbA1c on initial imaging in a pancreatic surveillance program. These findings may help tailor the surveillance protocols for those at increased risk of developing pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
|
50
|
Thompson ED, Roberts NJ, Wood LD, Eshleman JR, Goggins MG, Kern SE, Klein AP, Hruban RH. The genetics of ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas in the year 2020: dramatic progress, but far to go. Mod Pathol 2020; 33:2544-2563. [PMID: 32704031 PMCID: PMC8375585 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-020-0629-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Revised: 07/07/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The publication of the "Pan-Cancer Atlas" by the Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes Consortium, a partnership formed by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC), provides a wonderful opportunity to reflect on where we stand in our understanding of the genetics of pancreatic cancer, as well as on the opportunities to translate this understanding to patient care. From germline variants that predispose to the development of pancreatic cancer, to somatic mutations that are therapeutically targetable, genetics is now providing hope, where there once was no hope, for those diagnosed with pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth D Thompson
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nicholas J Roberts
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Laura D Wood
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - James R Eshleman
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael G Goggins
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Medicine, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Scott E Kern
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alison P Klein
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ralph H Hruban
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|