1
|
Phung LH, Nejo T, Okada H. Lessons from Post-Immunotherapy Tumor Tissues in Clinical Trials: How Can We Fuel the Tumor Microenvironment in Gliomas? Vaccines (Basel) 2024; 12:862. [PMID: 39203988 PMCID: PMC11359082 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12080862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2024] [Revised: 07/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/27/2024] [Indexed: 09/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Despite recent advancements in cancer immunotherapy, many patients with gliomas and glioblastomas have yet to experience substantial therapeutic benefits. Modulating the tumor microenvironment (TME) of gliomas, which is typically "cold", is crucial for improving treatment outcomes. Clinical tumor specimens obtained post-immunotherapy provide invaluable insights. However, access to such post-immunotherapy samples remains limited, even in clinical trials, as tumor tissues are often collected only at tumor relapse. Recent studies of neoadjuvant immunotherapy provided important insights by incorporating surgical resections of post-treatment tumors. Moreover, pre-surgical immunotherapies are increasingly integrated into clinical trial designs to evaluate treatment efficacy. These investigations reveal critical information, particularly regarding the delivery success of therapeutic agents, the expansion and persistence of immune products, and the cellular and molecular changes induced in the TME. In this review, we assess the findings on post-treatment tumor specimens obtained from recent immunotherapy clinical trials on gliomas, highlight the importance of these samples for understanding therapeutic impacts, and discuss proactive investigation approaches for future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lan Hoc Phung
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA; (L.H.P.); (T.N.)
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Takahide Nejo
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA; (L.H.P.); (T.N.)
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Hideho Okada
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA; (L.H.P.); (T.N.)
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
- Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, San Francisco, CA 94129, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gao W, Liu J, Shtylla B, Venkatakrishnan K, Yin D, Shah M, Nicholas T, Cao Y. Realizing the promise of Project Optimus: Challenges and emerging opportunities for dose optimization in oncology drug development. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol 2024; 13:691-709. [PMID: 37969061 PMCID: PMC11098159 DOI: 10.1002/psp4.13079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Revised: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Project Optimus is a US Food and Drug Administration Oncology Center of Excellence initiative aimed at reforming the dose selection and optimization paradigm in oncology drug development. This project seeks to bring together pharmaceutical companies, international regulatory agencies, academic institutions, patient advocates, and other stakeholders. Although there is much promise in this initiative, there are several challenges that need to be addressed, including multidimensionality of the dose optimization problem in oncology, the heterogeneity of cancer and patients, importance of evaluating long-term tolerability beyond dose-limiting toxicities, and the lack of reliable biomarkers for long-term efficacy. Through the lens of Totality of Evidence and with the mindset of model-informed drug development, we offer insights into dose optimization by building a quantitative knowledge base integrating diverse sources of data and leveraging quantitative modeling tools to build evidence for drug dosage considering exposure, disease biology, efficacy, toxicity, and patient factors. We believe that rational dose optimization can be achieved in oncology drug development, improving patient outcomes by maximizing therapeutic benefit while minimizing toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Gao
- Quantitative PharmacologyEMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.BillericaMassachusettsUSA
| | - Jiang Liu
- Food and Drug AdministrationSilver SpringMarylandUSA
| | - Blerta Shtylla
- Quantitative Systems PharmacologyPfizerSan DiegoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Karthik Venkatakrishnan
- Quantitative PharmacologyEMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.BillericaMassachusettsUSA
| | - Donghua Yin
- Clinical PharmacologyPfizerSan DiegoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Mirat Shah
- Food and Drug AdministrationSilver SpringMarylandUSA
| | | | - Yanguang Cao
- Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, Eshelman School of PharmacyUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Levit LA, Garrett-Mayer E, Peppercorn J, Ratain MJ. Critical importance of correctly defining and reporting secondary endpoints when assessing the ethics of research biopsies. Clin Trials 2024:17407745241244753. [PMID: 38654414 DOI: 10.1177/17407745241244753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
This article reviews the implementation challenges to the American Society of Clinical Oncology's ethical framework for including research biopsies in oncology clinical trials. The primary challenges to implementation relate to the definitions of secondary endpoints, the scientific and regulatory framework, and the incentive structure that encourages inclusion of biopsies. Principles of research stewardship require that the clinical trials community correctly articulate the scientific goals of any research biopsies, especially those that are required for the patient to enroll on a trial and receive an investigational agent. Furthermore, it is important to sufficiently justify the characterization of secondary (as distinguished from exploratory) endpoints, protect the interest of research participants, and report accurate and complete information to ClinicalTrials.gov and the published literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura A Levit
- Center for Research and Analytics, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer
- Center for Research and Analytics, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schenker MP, Silverman SG, Mayo-Smith WW, Khorasani R, Glazer DI. Clinical indications, safety, and effectiveness of percutaneous image-guided adrenal mass biopsy: an 8-year retrospective analysis in 160 patients. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024; 49:1231-1240. [PMID: 38430264 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04211-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess indications, safety, and effectiveness of percutaneous adrenal mass biopsy in contemporary practice. METHODS This institutional review board-approved, retrospective study included all patients undergoing percutaneous image-guided adrenal mass biopsies at an academic health system from January 6, 2015, to January 6, 2023. Patient demographics, biopsy indications, mass size, laboratory data, pathology results, and complications were recorded. Final diagnoses were based on pathology or ≥ 1 year of imaging follow-up when biopsy specimens did not yield malignant tissue. Test performance calculations excluded repeat biopsies. Continuous variables were compared with Student's t test, dichotomous variables with chi-squared test. RESULTS A total of 160 patients underwent 186 biopsies. Biopsies were indicated to diagnose metastatic disease (139/186; 74.7%), for oncologic research only (27/186; 14.5%), diagnose metastatic disease and oncologic research (15/186; 8%), and diagnose an incidental adrenal mass (5/186; 2.7%). Biopsy specimens were diagnostic in 154 patients (96.3%) and non-diagnostic in 6 (3.8%). Diagnostic biopsies yielded malignant tissue (n = 136), benign adrenal tissue (n = 12), and benign adrenal neoplasms (n = 6) with sensitivity = 98.6% (136/138), specificity = 100% (16/16), positive predictive value = 100% (136/136), and negative predictive value = 88.9% (16/18). Adverse events followed 11/186 procedures (5.9%) and most minor (7/11, 63.6%). The adverse event rate was similar whether tissue was obtained for clinical or research purposes (10/144; 6.9% vs. 1/42; 2.4%, p = 0.27), despite more specimens obtained for research (5.8 vs. 3.7, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Percutaneous adrenal mass biopsy is safe, accurate, and utilized almost exclusively to diagnose metastatic disease or for oncologic research. The negative predictive value is high when diagnostic tissue samples are obtained. Obtaining specimens for research does not increase adverse event risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew P Schenker
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Stuart G Silverman
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - William W Mayo-Smith
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Ramin Khorasani
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Center for Evidence-Based Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 1620 Tremont Street, Boston, MA, 02120, USA
| | - Daniel I Glazer
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
- Center for Evidence-Based Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 1620 Tremont Street, Boston, MA, 02120, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fassan M, Angerilli V, Normanno N, Pruneri G, Marchetti A, Grillo F, Tonini G, Scarpa A, Rimassa L. Practical guidelines for molecular testing of cholangiocarcinoma in clinical practice: Italian experts' position paper. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 194:104224. [PMID: 38211900 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Revised: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) represent a spectrum of malignancies associated with a dismal prognosis. Recent genomic profiling studies have provided a deeper understanding of the complex and heterogenous molecular landscape of BTCs, identifying several actionable genetic alterations, and expanding treatment options. Due to the high number and complexity of genetic alterations which require testing, next-generation sequencing (NGS) is currently the preferred approach over conventional methods (i.e., immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in-situ hybridization and PCR) for molecular profiling of BTCs and should be performed upfront in all BTC patients. However, BTC sampling often yields low tumor cellularity tissue, hampering NGS analysis. Future perspectives to overcome this obstacle include liquid biopsy and optimization of biopsy protocols. In this position paper, the authors discuss the current histopathologic, molecular, and therapeutic landscape of BTCs, provide a critical overview of the available testing methods for molecular diagnostics, and propose a practical diagnostic algorithm for molecular testing of BTC samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Fassan
- Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padua, Italy; Veneto Institute of Oncology, IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Nicola Normanno
- Cell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Pruneri
- Pathology Unit 2, Department of Innovation Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; University of Milan, School of Medicine, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Marchetti
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, Centre for Advanced Studies and Technology (CAST), University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Federica Grillo
- Pathology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Italy; IRCCS-Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
| | - Giuseppe Tonini
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Roma, Italy; Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Aldo Scarpa
- Section of Pathology, Department of Diagnostic and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Lorenza Rimassa
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kimmelman J. Ethics of gene and cell therapy development for neurologic disorders. HANDBOOK OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY 2024; 205:111-121. [PMID: 39341648 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-90120-8.00002-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/01/2024]
Abstract
In this chapter, I provide a condensed overview of nine recurring policy and ethical challenges encountered with the development of gene and cell therapies for neurologic disease. These include the question of when to initiate first-in-human trials, the ethics and policy of expanded/special access, the conduct of individualized therapy trials, subject selection in trials, designing trials for negative results, unintended effects of interventions on personal identity, comparator choice in randomized trials, consent and therapeutic misestimation, and cost and access for effective therapies. Broadly speaking, I argue that early in their development, the justification of risk in trials of gene and cell therapies derives from the social and scientific value of a trial and not the therapeutic value for trial participation. This generates strong imperatives to justify, design, and report trials appropriately and select patient populations that incur the least burden and opportunity cost for trial participation. Late in intervention development, policy makers must contend with the fact that proven effective interventions will almost certainly amplify strains in healthcare budgets as well as the ethical justifications standing behind reimbursement decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Kimmelman
- Studies of Translation, Ethics and Medicine, Department of Equity, Ethics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Angerilli V, Fornaro L, Pepe F, Rossi SM, Perrone G, Malapelle U, Fassan M. FGFR2 testing in cholangiocarcinoma: translating molecular studies into clinical practice. Pathologica 2023; 115:71-82. [PMID: 37017301 PMCID: PMC10462997 DOI: 10.32074/1591-951x-859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a heterogeneous group of neoplasms burdened by a dismal prognosis. Several studies have investigated the genomic profile of CCA and identified numerous druggable genetic alterations, including FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements. Approximately 5-7% of CCAs and 10-20% of intrahepatic iCCAs harbor FGFR2 fusions. With the recent advent of FGFR-targeting therapies into clinical practice, a standardization of molecular testing for FGFR2 alterations in CCA will be necessary. In this review, we describe the technical aspects and challenges related to FGFR2 testing in routine practice, focusing on the comparison between Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) and FISH assays, the best timing to perform the test, and on the role of liquid biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Angerilli
- Department of Medicine (DIMED), Surgical Pathology Unit, University of Padua, Padua (PD), Italy
| | - Lorenzo Fornaro
- Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa (PI), Italy
| | - Francesco Pepe
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples (NA), Italy
| | - Silvia Maria Rossi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Research Unit of Anatomical Pathology, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Roma, Italy
- Anatomical Pathology Operative Research Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Roma, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Perrone
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Research Unit of Anatomical Pathology, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Roma, Italy
- Anatomical Pathology Operative Research Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Roma, Italy
| | - Umberto Malapelle
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples (NA), Italy
| | - Matteo Fassan
- Department of Medicine (DIMED), Surgical Pathology Unit, University of Padua, Padua (PD), Italy
- Veneto Institute of Oncology, IOV - IRCCS, Padua (PD), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ackermann BL, Morrison RD, Hill S, Westfall MD, Butts BD, Soper MD, Fill JA, Schade AE, Liebler DC, Gruver AM. Targeted Quantitative Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Protein Biomarkers From Previously Stained Single Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tissue Sections. J Transl Med 2023; 103:100052. [PMID: 36870295 DOI: 10.1016/j.labinv.2022.100052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Revised: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues represent a majority of all biopsy specimens commonly analyzed by histologic or immunohistochemical staining with adhesive coverslips attached. Mass spectrometry (MS) has recently been used to precisely quantify proteins in samples consisting of multiple unstained formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections. Here, we report an MS method to analyze proteins from a single coverslipped 4-μm section previously stained with hematoxylin and eosin, Masson trichrome, or 3,3'-diaminobenzidine-based immunohistochemical staining. We analyzed serial unstained and stained sections from non-small cell lung cancer specimens for proteins of varying abundance (PD-L1, RB1, CD73, and HLA-DRA). Coverslips were removed by soaking in xylene, and after tryptic digestion, peptides were analyzed by targeted high-resolution liquid chromatography with tandem MS with stable isotope-labeled peptide standards. The low-abundance proteins RB1 and PD-L1 were quantified in 31 and 35 of 50 total sections analyzed, respectively, whereas higher abundance CD73 and HLA-DRA were quantified in 49 and 50 sections, respectively. The inclusion of targeted β-actin measurement enabled normalization in samples where residual stain interfered with bulk protein quantitation by colorimetric assay. Measurement coefficient of variations for 5 replicate slides (hematoxylin and eosin stained vs unstained) from each block ranged from 3% to 18% for PD-L1, from 1% to 36% for RB1, 3% to 21% for CD73, and 4% to 29% for HLA-DRA. Collectively, these results demonstrate that targeted MS protein quantification can add a valuable data layer to clinical tissue specimens after assessment for standard pathology end points.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Brent D Butts
- Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Michael D Soper
- Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Jeff A Fill
- Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Andrew E Schade
- Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | | | - Aaron M Gruver
- Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Araujo D, Greystoke A, Bates S, Bayle A, Calvo E, Castelo-Branco L, de Bono J, Drilon A, Garralda E, Ivy P, Kholmanskikh O, Melero I, Pentheroudakis G, Petrie J, Plummer R, Ponce S, Postel-Vinay S, Siu L, Spreafico A, Stathis A, Steeghs N, Yap C, Yap TA, Ratain M, Seymour L. Oncology phase I trial design and conduct: time for a change - MDICT Guidelines 2022. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:48-60. [PMID: 36182023 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.09.158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
In 2021, the Food and Drug Administration Oncology Center of Excellence announced Project Optimus focusing on dose optimization for oncology drugs. The Methodology for the Development of Innovative Cancer Therapies (MDICT) Taskforce met to review and discuss the optimization of dosage for oncology trials and to develop a practical guide for oncology phase I trials. Defining a single recommended phase II dose based on toxicity may define doses that are neither the most effective nor the best tolerated. MDICT recommendations address the need for robust non-clinical data which are needed to inform trial design, as well as an expert team including statisticians and pharmacologists. The protocol must be flexible and adaptive, with clear definition of all endpoints. Health authorities should be consulted early and regularly. Strategies such as randomization, intrapatient dose escalation, and real-world eligibility criteria are encouraged whereas serial tumor sampling is discouraged in the absence of a strong rationale and appropriately validated assay. Endpoints should include consideration of all longitudinal toxicity. The phase I dose escalation trial should define the recommended dose range for later testing in randomized phase II trials, rather than a single recommended phase II dose, and consider scenarios where different populations may require different dosages. The adoption of these recommendations will improve dosage selection in early clinical trials of new anticancer treatments and ultimately, outcomes for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Araujo
- Hospital de Base, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Brazil
| | - A Greystoke
- Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Newcastle, UK
| | - S Bates
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, USA
| | - A Bayle
- Institut Gustave Roussy, Paris, France
| | - E Calvo
- START Madrid-CIOCC, Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal, Madrid, Spain
| | - L Castelo-Branco
- European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - J de Bono
- Institute of Cancer Research, University of London, London; The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - A Drilon
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| | - E Garralda
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Ivy
- National Cancer Institute, USA Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program Investigational Drug Branch (NCI/CTEP/IDB), Bethesda, USA
| | - O Kholmanskikh
- European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products, Brussels, Belgium
| | - I Melero
- CUN and CIMA, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - G Pentheroudakis
- European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - J Petrie
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston
| | - R Plummer
- Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Newcastle, UK
| | - S Ponce
- Institut Gustave Roussy, Paris, France
| | | | - L Siu
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - A Spreafico
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - A Stathis
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - N Steeghs
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Yap
- Institute of Cancer Research, University of London, London
| | - T A Yap
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - M Ratain
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA
| | - L Seymour
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Madoff DC, Abi-Jaoudeh N, Braxton D, Goyal L, Jain D, Odisio BC, Salem R, Schattner M, Sheth R, Li D. An Expert, Multidisciplinary Perspective on Best Practices in Biomarker Testing in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. Oncologist 2022; 27:884-891. [PMID: 35925597 PMCID: PMC9526481 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is a rare and aggressive malignancy that arises from the intrahepatic biliary tree and is associated with a poor prognosis. Until recently, the treatment landscape of advanced/metastatic iCCA has been limited primarily to chemotherapy. In recent years, the advent of biomarker testing has identified actionable genetic alterations in 40%-50% of patients with iCCA, heralding an era of precision medicine for these patients. Biomarker testing using next-generation sequencing (NGS) has since become increasingly relevant in iCCA; however, several challenges and gaps in standard image-guided liver biopsy and processing have been identified. These include variability in tissue acquisition relating to the imaging modality used for biopsy guidance, the biopsy method used, number of passes, needle choice, specimen preparation methods, the desmoplastic nature of the tumor, as well as the lack of communication among the multidisciplinary team. Recognizing these challenges and the lack of evidence-based guidelines for biomarker testing in iCCA, a multidisciplinary team of experts including interventional oncologists, a gastroenterologist, medical oncologists, and pathologists suggest best practices for optimizing tissue collection and biomarker testing in iCCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David C Madoff
- Corresponding author: David C. Madoff, MD, FSIR, FACR, FCIRSE, Yale School of Medicine, 330 Cedar Street, TE-2, New Haven, CT 06520, USA. Tel: +1 203 785 5102; Fax: +1 203 737 1241;
| | | | - David Braxton
- Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, CA, USA
| | | | - Dhanpat Jain
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Bruno C Odisio
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Riad Salem
- Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Mark Schattner
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rahul Sheth
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Levit LA, Kaneshiro J, Peppercorn J, Ratain MJ. An Expanded Role for IRBs in the Oversight of Research Biopsies. Ethics Hum Res 2022; 44:32-41. [PMID: 36047275 DOI: 10.1002/eahr.500141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Research biopsies included in cancer clinical trials have the goal of advancing scientific understanding of the biological bases of cancer and its treatments, but may offer no prospect of direct benefit to participants and often pose more than minimal risk. The research community is examining the ethics of research biopsies increasingly often, especially when they are mandatory for study participation but do not support primary study objectives and thus are "nonintegral" to the study. Ethical concerns center on the limited scientific justification supporting some biopsies, risks to research participants, and the potential for coercion and therapeutic misconception during the informed consent process. There is also a lack of comprehensive oversight of research biopsies by regulatory agencies and institutions. This paper reviews these ethical concerns, discusses the scope of federal oversight, and suggests that institutional review boards (IRBs) should assume a larger role in ensuring the ethical conduct of research biopsies. It concludes with guidance to IRBs on how to weigh the risks, benefits, and acceptability of such biopsies in different contexts that is based on a framework the American Society of Clinical Oncology developed for the inclusion of research biopsies in oncology clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura A Levit
- Director of research analysis and publications in the Center for Research and Analytics at the American Society of Clinical Oncology
| | - Julie Kaneshiro
- Deputy director of the Office for Human Research Protections at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
LoRusso P, Ratain MJ, Doi T, Rasco DW, de Jonge MJA, Moreno V, Carneiro BA, Devriese LA, Petrich A, Modi D, Morgan-Lappe S, Nuthalapati S, Motwani M, Dunbar M, Glasgow J, Medeiros BC, Calvo E. Eftozanermin alfa (ABBV-621) monotherapy in patients with previously treated solid tumors: findings of a phase 1, first-in-human study. Invest New Drugs 2022; 40:762-772. [PMID: 35467243 PMCID: PMC9035501 DOI: 10.1007/s10637-022-01247-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Eftozanermin alfa (eftoza), a second-generation tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor (TRAIL-R) agonist, induces apoptosis in tumor cells by activation of death receptors 4/5. This phase 1 dose-escalation/dose-optimization study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary activity of eftoza in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients received eftoza 2.5-15 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 or day 1/day 8 every 21 days in the dose-escalation phase, and 1.25-7.5 mg/kg once-weekly (QW) in the dose-optimization phase. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were evaluated during the first treatment cycle to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Pharmacodynamic effects were evaluated in circulation and tumor tissue. A total of 105 patients were enrolled in the study (dose-escalation cohort, n = 57; dose-optimization cohort, n = 48 patients [n = 24, colorectal cancer (CRC); n = 24, pancreatic cancer (PaCA)]). In the dose-escalation cohort, seven patients experienced DLTs. MTD and RP2D were not determined. Most common treatment-related adverse events were increased alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels, nausea, and fatigue. The one treatment-related death occurred due to respiratory failure. In the dose-optimization cohort, three patients (CRC, n = 2; PaCA, n = 1) had a partial response. Target engagement with regard to receptor saturation, and downstream apoptotic pathway activation in circulation and tumor were observed. Eftoza had acceptable safety, evidence of pharmacodynamic effects, and preliminary anticancer activity. The 7.5-mg/kg QW regimen was selected for future studies on the basis of safety findings, pharmacodynamic effects, and biomarker modulations. (Trial registration number: NCT03082209 (registered: March 17, 2017)).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Toshihiko Doi
- National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | | | | | - Victor Moreno
- START Madrid-FJD, Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Benedito A Carneiro
- Lifespan Cancer Institute, Cancer Center at Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Lot A Devriese
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Emiliano Calvo
- START Madrid-CIOCC, Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Narrative online guides for the interpretation of digital-pathology images and tissue-atlas data. Nat Biomed Eng 2022; 6:515-526. [PMID: 34750536 PMCID: PMC9079188 DOI: 10.1038/s41551-021-00789-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2020] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Multiplexed tissue imaging facilitates the diagnosis and understanding of complex disease traits. However, the analysis of such digital images heavily relies on the experience of anatomical pathologists for the review, annotation and description of tissue features. In addition, the wider use of data from tissue atlases in basic and translational research and in classrooms would benefit from software that facilitates the easy visualization and sharing of the images and the results of their analyses. In this Perspective, we describe the ecosystem of software available for the analysis of tissue images and discuss the need for interactive online guides that help histopathologists make complex images comprehensible to non-specialists. We illustrate this idea via a software interface (Minerva), accessible via web browsers, that integrates multi-omic and tissue-atlas features. We argue that such interactive narrative guides can effectively disseminate digital histology data and aid their interpretation.
Collapse
|
14
|
Practical consideration for successful sequential tumor biopsies in first-in-human trials. Invest New Drugs 2022; 40:841-849. [PMID: 35404018 PMCID: PMC9288361 DOI: 10.1007/s10637-022-01236-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
In first-in-human (FIH) trials, sequential tumor biopsies, i.e., two consecutive tumor biopsies, the first performed at baseline (pretreatment) and the second during the early treatment period (on-treatment), provide proof of concept in investigational new drugs. We evaluated the success of sequential tumor biopsies in FIH trials, and explored approaches for improved success rates. We retrospectively reviewed the sequential tumor biopsies required in 17 of 52 FIH trials conducted from 2015 to 2020. One hundred and thirty-eight patients were identified. Success of either pretreatment or on-treatment biopsy alone, and of sequential tumor biopsies, was defined as the acquisition of viable tumor cells and as obtaining tumor cells from both biopsy specimens, respectively. The success rates of pretreatment and on-treatment biopsy were 98.6% and 94.2%, respectively, and of sequential tumor biopsies was 70.3%. Adverse events associated with the pretreatment biopsies (33.3% positive; 72.0% negative) and timing of the first imaging assessment (before on-treatment biopsy = 40.0%; after on-treatment biopsy = 82.7%) correlated with successful sequential tumor biopsies. The reasons for unsuccessful sequential tumor biopsies could be categorized into two groups: 1) patient refusal of the on-treatment biopsy (most frequently due to early disease progression); and 2) absence of tumor cells in the pretreatment or on-treatment biopsy specimen. We propose an approach to achieving greater success in sequential tumor biopsies in FIH trials; the first imaging assessment during the study should be scheduled after on-treatment biopsy. (Registration number UMIN000042487, Date of registration November 18, 2020).
Collapse
|
15
|
Bittlinger M, Bicer S, Peppercorn J, Kimmelman J. Ethical Considerations for Phase I Trials in Oncology. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:3474-3488. [PMID: 35275736 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Phase I trials often represent the first occasion where new cancer strategies are tested in patients. Various developments in cancer biology, methodology, regulation, and medical ethics have altered the ethical landscape of such trials. We provide a narrative review of contemporary ethical challenges in design, conduct, and reporting of phase I cancer trials and outline recommendations for addressing each. We organized our review around four topics, supplementing the first three with scoping reviews: (1) benefit/risk, (2) research biopsies, (3) therapeutic misconception and misestimation, and (4) reporting. The main ethical challenges of conducting phase I trials stem from three issues. First, phase I trials often involve higher research burden and scientific uncertainty compared with other cancer trials. Second, many patients arrive at phase I trials at a transitional point in their illness trajectory where they have exhausted standard survival-extending options. Third, phase I trial results play a major role in informing downstream drug development and regulatory decisions. Together, these issues create distinct pressures for study design, ethical review, informed consent, and reporting. Developments in methodology, regulation, cancer biology, and ethical awareness have helped mitigate some of these challenges, while introducing others. We conclude our review with a series of recommendations regarding trial design, ethical review, consent, and reporting. We also outline several unresolved questions that, if addressed, would strengthen the ethical foundation of phase I cancer trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merlin Bittlinger
- Studies of Translation, Ethics and Medicine (STREAM), Department of Equity, Ethics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Selin Bicer
- Studies of Translation, Ethics and Medicine (STREAM), Department of Equity, Ethics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Jonathan Kimmelman
- Studies of Translation, Ethics and Medicine (STREAM), Department of Equity, Ethics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
de las Heras B, Bouyoucef‐Cherchalli D, Reeve L, Reichl A, Mandarino D, Flach S, Vidal L, van Brummelen EMJ, Steeghs N. Healthy volunteers in first-in-human oncology drug development for small molecules. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2022; 88:1773-1784. [PMID: 34558113 PMCID: PMC10234445 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Revised: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
This review provides tools to consider the inclusion of healthy volunteers (HVs) in first-in-human (FIH) oncology clinical trials with small molecules, including targeted and immunomodulatory agents, a strategy that was not envisioned with classic chemotherapy. To enable an FIH oncology trial in HVs compared to cancer patients (CPs), a robust nonclinical package must be generated, which includes toxicokinetic and pharmacokinetic studies, as well as more extensive safety pharmacology, toxicology and genotoxicity studies. This strategy could provide an early clinical characterization of the pharmacokinetic parameters and clinical safety profile in the absence of comorbidities and concomitant medication. It also avoids the ethical issue of administrating subtherapeutic doses to CPs, and could potentially help to accelerate the timelines of clinical drug development for patient care. That being said, stakeholders involved in these studies need to proceed with caution, fully understand the regulatory guidance and thoroughly evaluate the benefits and risks. This paper serves to address the regulatory guidance and other considerations needed when using healthy volunteers in early oncology trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Begoña de las Heras
- Labcorp Drug Development Inc., headquarters in BurlingtonNorth CarolinaUSA
- Madrid Medical Doctors AssociationMadridSpain
| | | | - Lesley Reeve
- Labcorp Drug Development Inc., headquarters in BurlingtonNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Andreas Reichl
- Labcorp Drug Development Inc., headquarters in BurlingtonNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Debra Mandarino
- Labcorp Drug Development Inc., headquarters in BurlingtonNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Stephen Flach
- Labcorp Drug Development Inc., headquarters in BurlingtonNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Laura Vidal
- Labcorp Drug Development Inc., headquarters in BurlingtonNorth CarolinaUSA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Olympios N, Collet L, Paesmans M, Jungels C, Kotecki N, Awada A, Aftimos P. Analyses of the Rationale and Implementation of Research Biopsies in Oncology Clinical Trials at a Tertiary Cancer Center. Oncologist 2021; 26:1062-1070. [PMID: 34286890 PMCID: PMC8649004 DOI: 10.1002/onco.13906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biomarkers in clinical trials have led to massive incorporation of research biopsies, with potentially risks and no direct benefit for patients. In 2018, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) released an ethical framework to provide guidance on incorporating research biopsies in cancer clinical trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS We collected biopsy requirements of cancer clinical trials conducted at Institut Jules Bordet (IJB) between 2015 and 2019 to examine adherence with the ASCO Ethical Framework. We used logistic regression models to test the association between the request for biopsy, the request for tissue, and the adherence to the ASCO framework as well as some trial characteristics. RESULTS Between January 2015 and December 2019, 178 oncological studies were conducted at IJB. Of these, 138 (78%) were sponsored by industry, 132 (74%) were phase II and III studies, and 141 (79%) concerned metastatic disease. Tissue was required for inclusion for 119 (67%) studies, among which 59 required at least one new biopsy. Adherence to ASCO's Ethical Framework was 67% for studies requiring tissue and went down to 39% for studies requiring at least one new biopsy. In multivariate analysis, requests for tissue or new biopsies increased in early-phase studies (p < .001, p < .001, respectively) and in studies investigating innovative treatments (immunotherapy or targeted therapies; p < .01, p = .02). Compliance to the ASCO framework significantly decreased with time (p < .001) and in early-phase studies (p < .001). CONCLUSION Numerous studies required tissue or new biopsies for exploratory objectives of unknown clinical utility. Requests for tissue increased over the years, whereas compliance to ASCO's Ethical Framework decreased. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE In 2019, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) developed an ethical framework to provide guidance on incorporating research biopsies in clinical trials. This study underlines the growing request for tissue in clinical trials with potentially no impact on drug development and no benefit to actual or future patients. Adherence to ASCO's Ethical Framework decreases through time. These results highlight the importance of improving the ethics of research biopsies. ASCO's Ethical Framework offers an opportunity to improve quality of care in clinical research by maximizing scientific utility and allowing for clinically meaningful correlative science and safe access to innovative treatments for a maximum number of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathalie Olympios
- Medical Oncology Clinic, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium
| | - Laetitia Collet
- Medical Oncology Clinic, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium
| | - Marianne Paesmans
- Data Centre, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium
| | - Christiane Jungels
- Medical Oncology Clinic, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium
- Clinical Trials Conduct Unit (CTCU), Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium
| | - Nuria Kotecki
- Medical Oncology Clinic, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium
- Clinical Trials Conduct Unit (CTCU), Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium
| | - Ahmad Awada
- Medical Oncology Clinic, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium
| | - Philippe Aftimos
- Medical Oncology Clinic, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium
- Clinical Trials Conduct Unit (CTCU), Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Madariaga A, Bhat G, Wilson MK, Li X, Cyriac S, Bowering V, Hunt W, Gutierrez D, Bonilla L, Kasherman L, McMullen M, Wang L, Ghai S, Dhani NC, Oza AM, Lheureux S. Research biopsies in patients with gynecologic cancers: patient-reported outcomes, perceptions, and preferences. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021; 225:658.e1-658.e9. [PMID: 34174204 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.06.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the growing integration of mandatory biopsies for correlative endpoints within oncology clinical trials, there are sparse data on patient-reported outcomes, perceptions, and preferences. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to prospectively assess the impact of research biopsies on the quality of life in patients with gynecologic cancer, evaluate patient-reported outcomes, and determine factors associated with patients' willingness to undergo sequential biopsies. STUDY DESIGN We conducted a prospective study in patients with gynecologic malignancies undergoing research biopsies between 2015 and 2019 at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02334761). Here, we report the results of the paper-based surveys performed before and 1 week after biopsy. Although the questionnaires each assessed the impact of anxiety using a modified version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the postbiopsy questionnaire specifically assessed the likelihood of future biopsies, postbiopsy symptoms, complications, and perceptions. RESULTS A total of 129 patients were enrolled, of which 91 (70.5%) completed at least 1 questionnaire. These patients had either ovarian (89%; 81 of 91) or endometrial cancer (11%; 10 of 91). Of all biopsies taken, 75% were from the abdomen or pelvis (67 of 89). There was 1 clinician-reported complication, a perihepatic hematoma (1%). Pain during the biopsy and physical discomfort were experienced by 60.3% (41 of 68) and 61.8% (42 of 68), respectively. Embarrassment and loss of dignity were experienced by 13.2% (9 of 68) and 11.8% (8 of 68), respectively. Although the mean Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score was in the normal range before and after biopsy, there was a significant decline in the total score after the biopsy (prebiopsy, 5.3 [standard deviation, 4.7] vs postbiopsy, 3.7 [standard deviation, 4.5]; P=.005); 84% of subjects (58 of 69) stated that they would definitely or likely consent to another biopsy. There was no impact on patients' willingness for future biopsies based on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status, biopsy site, age, number of cores, and pain during the biopsy; however, subjects who reported feeling physically uncomfortable (odds ratio, 0.14; P=.005), embarrassed (odds ratio, 0.03; P=.004) or experienced loss of dignity (odds ratio, 0.05; P=.01) during the biopsy and those who experienced flu-like symptoms (odds ratio, 0.2; P=.018) or felt feverish (odds ratio, 0.2; P=.035) 1 week after biopsy, were less likely to undergo a sequential biopsy. Similarly, those with higher Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores before biopsy (odds ratio, 0.83; P=.008) and after biopsy (odds ratio, 0.8; P=.003) were less likely to consent for another biopsy. CONCLUSION Research biopsies were generally well accepted. Most patients (83%) were willing to undergo serial biopsies if necessary. Addressing the potentially modifiable psychosocial aspects of the procedure may improve the experience with research biopsies for patients with gynecologic cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ainhoa Madariaga
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gita Bhat
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michelle K Wilson
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Xuan Li
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sunu Cyriac
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Valerie Bowering
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wendy Hunt
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Gutierrez
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Luisa Bonilla
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lawrence Kasherman
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michelle McMullen
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lisa Wang
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sangeet Ghai
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Neesha C Dhani
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amit M Oza
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephanie Lheureux
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Weinfurtner K, Cho J, Ackerman D, Chen JX, Woodard A, Li W, Ostrowski D, Soulen MC, Dagli M, Shamimi-Noori S, Mondschein J, Sudheendra D, Stavropoulos SW, Reddy S, Redmond J, Khaddash T, Jhala D, Siegelman ES, Furth EE, Hunt SJ, Nadolski GJ, Kaplan DE, Gade TPF. Variability in biopsy quality informs translational research applications in hepatocellular carcinoma. Sci Rep 2021; 11:22763. [PMID: 34815453 PMCID: PMC8611010 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-02093-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
In the era of precision medicine, biopsies are playing an increasingly central role in cancer research and treatment paradigms; however, patient outcomes and analyses of biopsy quality, as well as impact on downstream clinical and research applications, remain underreported. Herein, we report biopsy safety and quality outcomes for percutaneous core biopsies of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) performed as part of a prospective clinical trial. Patients with a clinical diagnosis of HCC were enrolled in a prospective cohort study for the genetic, proteomic, and metabolomic profiling of HCC at two academic medical centers from April 2016 to July 2020. Under image guidance, 18G core biopsies were obtained using coaxial technique at the time of locoregional therapy. The primary outcome was biopsy quality, defined as tumor fraction in the core biopsy. 56 HCC lesions from 50 patients underwent 60 biopsy events with a median of 8 core biopsies per procedure (interquartile range, IQR, 7–10). Malignancy was identified in 45/56 (80.4%, 4 without pathology) biopsy events, including HCC (40/56, 71.4%) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) or combined HCC-CCA (5/56, 8.9%). Biopsy quality was highly variable with a median of 40% tumor in each biopsy core (IQR 10–75). Only 43/56 (76.8%) and 23/56 (41.1%) samples met quality thresholds for genomic or metabolomic/proteomic profiling, respectively, requiring expansion of the clinical trial. Overall and major complication rates were 5/60 (8.3%) and 3/60 (5.0%), respectively. Despite uniform biopsy protocol, biopsy quality varied widely with up to 59% of samples to be inadequate for intended purpose. This finding has important consequences for clinical trial design and highlights the need for quality control prior to applications in which the presence of benign cell types may substantially alter findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelley Weinfurtner
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Joshua Cho
- Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Daniel Ackerman
- Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - James X Chen
- Vascular & Interventional Specialists of Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Abashai Woodard
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Wuyan Li
- Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - David Ostrowski
- Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michael C Soulen
- Division of Interventional Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mandeep Dagli
- Division of Interventional Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Susan Shamimi-Noori
- Division of Interventional Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jeffrey Mondschein
- Division of Interventional Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Deepak Sudheendra
- Division of Interventional Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Shilpa Reddy
- Division of Interventional Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Corporal Michael J Cresenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jonas Redmond
- Division of Interventional Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Corporal Michael J Cresenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Tamim Khaddash
- Division of Interventional Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Corporal Michael J Cresenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Darshana Jhala
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Evan S Siegelman
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Emma E Furth
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Stephen J Hunt
- Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Division of Interventional Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Gregory J Nadolski
- Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Corporal Michael J Cresenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - David E Kaplan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Corporal Michael J Cresenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Terence P F Gade
- Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. .,Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. .,Division of Interventional Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. .,Corporal Michael J Cresenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA. .,Radiology and Cancer Biology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 652 BRB II/III, 421 Curie Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-6160, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Dermody SM, Shuman AG. Implications of Research Biopsies in Clinical Trials. Oncologist 2021; 26:994-996. [PMID: 34418217 DOI: 10.1002/onco.13948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah M Dermody
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Andrew G Shuman
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.,Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.,Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bekaii-Saab TS, Bridgewater J, Normanno N. Practical considerations in screening for genetic alterations in cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Oncol 2021; 32:1111-1126. [PMID: 33932504 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) encompasses diverse epithelial tumors historically associated with poor outcomes due to an aggressive disease course, late diagnosis, and limited benefit of standard chemotherapy for advanced disease. Comprehensive molecular profiling has revealed a diverse landscape of genomic alterations as oncogenic drivers in CCA. TP53 mutations, CDKN2A/B loss, and KRAS mutations are the most common genetic alterations in CCA. However, intrahepatic CCA (iCCA) and extrahepatic CCA (eCCA) differ substantially in the frequency of many alterations. This includes actionable alterations, such as isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutations and a large variety of FGFR2 rearrangements, which are found in up to 29% and ∼10% of patients with iCCA, respectively, but are rare in eCCA. FGFR2 rearrangements are currently the only genetic alteration in CCA for which a targeted therapy, the fibroblast growth factor receptor 1-3 inhibitor pemigatinib, has been approved. However, favorable phase III results for IDH1-targeted therapy with ivosidenib in iCCA have been published, and numerous other alterations are actionable by targeted therapies approved in other indications. Recent advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) have led to the development of assays that allow comprehensive genomic profiling of large gene panels within 2-3 weeks, including in vitro diagnostic tests approved in the United States. These assays vary regarding acceptable source material (tumor tissue or peripheral whole blood), genetic source for library construction (DNA or RNA), target selection technology, gene panel size, and type of detectable genomic alterations. While some large commercial laboratories offer rapid and comprehensive genomic profiling services based on proprietary assay platforms, clinical centers may use commercial genomic profiling kits designed for clinical research to develop their own customized laboratory-developed tests. Large-scale genomic profiling based on NGS allows for a detailed and precise molecular diagnosis of CCA and provides an important opportunity for improved targeted treatment plans tailored to the individual patient's genetic signature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - J Bridgewater
- University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | - N Normanno
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori 'Fondazione Giovanni Pascale' IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Vogl DT, Sallée V, Hendricks MC, Redlinger Tabery C, Blair ML, Dahlmeier E, Meagher EA, Cohen RB, Vonderheide RH. A unique window of opportunity for practical reform of cancer clinical trials. Cancer 2021; 127:2855-2860. [PMID: 33849079 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Revised: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
With rapid modifications in cancer clinical trial operations necessitated by the global pandemic over the last year, there is now an unprecedented opportunity to reform clinical research permanently and solidify innovative practices that have clearly been effective. On the basis of the authors' experience and recommendations from other institutions, a set of specific proposals for clinical trial reform are identified that can be implemented immediately by sponsors, regulators, and study sites. Improvements in clinical trial processes should include increased leverage of technology to facilitate remote trial activity and electronic documents, more efficient and effective communication of adverse event information, and better study design to optimize inclusion criteria, required research procedures, and data collection. The authors suggest that such reform will preserve patient safety and study integrity, address unnecessary and inefficient pre-pandemic constraints, improve access to clinical trials for patients, and speed improvements in cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan T Vogl
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Vicki Sallée
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Maria C Hendricks
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Colleen Redlinger Tabery
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Meghan L Blair
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Erica Dahlmeier
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Emma A Meagher
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Roger B Cohen
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Robert H Vonderheide
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Applications of liquid biopsy in the Pharmacological Audit Trail for anticancer drug development. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2021; 18:454-467. [PMID: 33762744 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-021-00489-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Anticancer drug development is a costly and protracted activity, and failure at late phases of clinical testing is common. We have previously proposed the Pharmacological Audit Trail (PhAT) intended to improve the efficiency of drug development, with a focus on the use of tumour tissue-based biomarkers. Blood-based 'liquid biopsy' approaches, such as targeted or whole-genome sequencing studies of plasma circulating cell-free tumour DNA (ctDNA) and circulating tumour cells (CTCs), are of increasing relevance to this drug development paradigm. Liquid biopsy assays can provide quantitative and qualitative data on prognostic, predictive, pharmacodynamic and clinical response biomarkers, and can also enable the characterization of disease evolution and resistance mechanisms. In this Perspective, we examine the promise of integrating liquid biopsy analyses into the PhAT, focusing on the current evidence, advances, limitations and challenges. We emphasize the continued importance of analytical validation and clinical qualification of circulating tumour biomarkers through prospective clinical trials.
Collapse
|
24
|
Biondo A, Pal A, Riisnaes R, Shinde R, Tiu C, Lockie F, Baker C, Bertan C, Crespo M, Ferreira A, Pereira R, Figueiredo I, Miranda S, Gurel B, Carreira S, Banerji U, de Bono J, Lopez J, Tunariu N, Minchom A. Research Related Tumour Biopsies in Early-Phase Trials with Simultaneous Molecular Characterisation - a Single Unit Experience. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2021; 27:100309. [PMID: 33549985 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2021.100309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Revised: 01/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Early-phase cancer clinical trials are becoming increasingly accessible for patients with advanced cancer who have exhausted standard treatment options and later phase trial options. Many of these trials mandate research tissue biopsies. Research biopsies have been perceived as ethically fraught due to the perception of potential coercion of vulnerable human subjects. We performed an audit of two years of practice to assess the safety of ultrasound (US)-guided research biopsies, and to look at the yield of a simultaneous tumour next-generation sequencing (NGS) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) molecular characterisation programme. We show that in our institution, US-guided research biopsies were safe, produced adequate tumour content and in a selected subset who underwent in-house NGS sequencing, showed a high rate of actionable mutations with 30% having a Tier 1 variant. Nevertheless, these research biopsies may only provide direct benefit for a minority of patients and we conclude with a reflection on the importance of obtaining truly informed consent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Biondo
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital/The Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT
| | - Abhijit Pal
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital/The Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT
| | - Ruth Riisnaes
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital/The Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT
| | - Rajiv Shinde
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital/The Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT
| | - Crescens Tiu
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital/The Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT
| | - Fran Lockie
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital/The Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT
| | - Chloe Baker
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital/The Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT
| | - Claudia Bertan
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital/The Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT
| | - Mateus Crespo
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital/The Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT
| | - Ana Ferreira
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital/The Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT
| | - Rita Pereira
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital/The Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT
| | - Ines Figueiredo
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital/The Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT
| | - Susana Miranda
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital/The Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT
| | - Bora Gurel
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital/The Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT
| | - Suzanne Carreira
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital/The Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT
| | - Udai Banerji
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital/The Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT
| | - Johann de Bono
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital/The Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT
| | - Juanita Lopez
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital/The Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT
| | - Nina Tunariu
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital/The Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT
| | - Anna Minchom
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital/The Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Seah DS, Leone JP, Openshaw TH, Scott SM, Tayob N, Hu J, Lederman RI, Frank ES, Sohl JJ, Stadler ZK, Erick TK, Silverman SG, Peppercorn JM, Winer EP, Come SE, Lin NU. Perceptions of patients with early stage breast cancer toward research biopsies. Cancer 2020; 127:1208-1219. [PMID: 33320362 PMCID: PMC8247276 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Revised: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 11/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Background The objective of this study was to describe the perspective of patients with early breast cancer toward research biopsies. The authors hypothesized that more patients at academic sites than at community‐based sites would be willing to consider these procedures. Methods In total, 198 patients with early stage breast cancer were recruited from 3 academic centers (n = 102) and from 1 community oncology practice (n = 96). The primary objective was to compare the proportion of patients willing to consider donating excess tissue biospecimens from surgery, from a clinically indicated breast biopsy, or from a research purposes‐only biopsy (RPOB) between practice types. Results Most patients (93% at academic sites, 94% at the community oncology site) said they would consider donating excess tissue from surgery for research. One‐half of patients from academic or community sites would consider donating tissue from a clinically indicated breast biopsy. On univariate analysis, significantly fewer patients from academic sites would consider an RPOB (22% at academic sites, 42% at the community site; P = .003); however, this difference was no longer significant on multivariate analysis (P = .96). Longer transportation times and unfavorable prior experiences were associated with less willingness to consider an RPOB on multivariate analysis. Significantly fewer patients from academic sites (14%) than from the community site (35%) would consider a research biopsy in a clinical trial (P = .04). Contributing to scientific knowledge, return of results, and a personal request by their physician were the strongest factors influencing patients' willingness to undergo research biopsies. Conclusions The current results rejected the hypothesis that more patients with early breast cancer at academic sites would be willing to donate tissue biospecimens for research compared with those at community oncology sites. These findings identify modifiable factors to consider in biobanking studies and clinical trials. In this study of the willingness of patients with early stage breast cancer to consider biospecimen collection procedures for the purposes of research, most patients were willing to provide blood samples for research but were less likely to consider percutaneous breast biopsies. Longer travel time to the clinic and adverse experiences with prior biopsies, but not treatment center type (academic versus community‐based center), were associated with less willingness to consider research biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davinia S Seah
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jose Pablo Leone
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Sarah M Scott
- Department of Medical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nabihah Tayob
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jiani Hu
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ruth I Lederman
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elizabeth S Frank
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jessica J Sohl
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Zsofia K Stadler
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Timothy K Erick
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stuart G Silverman
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jeffrey M Peppercorn
- Department of Medicine, Harvard University and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Eric P Winer
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Steven E Come
- Department of Medical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nancy U Lin
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Pennell NA, Dillmon M, Levit LA, Moushey EA, Alva AS, Blau S, Cannon TL, Dickson NR, Diehn M, Gonen M, Gonzalez MM, Hensold JO, Hinyard LJ, King T, Lindsey SC, Magnuson A, Marron J, McAneny BL, McDonnell TM, Mileham KF, Nasso SF, Nowakowski GS, Oettel KR, Patel MI, Patt DA, Perlmutter J, Pickard TA, Rodriguez G, Rosenberg AR, Russo B, Szczepanek C, Smith CB, Srivastava P, Teplinsky E, Thota R, Traina TA, Zon R, Bourbeau B, Bruinooge SS, Foster S, Grubbs S, Hagerty K, Hurley P, Kamin D, Phillips J, Schenkel C, Schilsky RL, Burris HA. American Society of Clinical Oncology Road to Recovery Report: Learning From the COVID-19 Experience to Improve Clinical Research and Cancer Care. J Clin Oncol 2020; 39:155-169. [PMID: 33290128 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.02953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
This report presents the American Society of Clinical Oncology's (ASCO's) evaluation of the adaptations in care delivery, research operations, and regulatory oversight made in response to the coronavirus pandemic and presents recommendations for moving forward as the pandemic recedes. ASCO organized its recommendations for clinical research around five goals to ensure lessons learned from the COVID-19 experience are used to craft a more equitable, accessible, and efficient clinical research system that protects patient safety, ensures scientific integrity, and maintains data quality. The specific goals are: (1) ensure that clinical research is accessible, affordable, and equitable; (2) design more pragmatic and efficient clinical trials; (3) minimize administrative and regulatory burdens on research sites; (4) recruit, retain, and support a well-trained clinical research workforce; and (5) promote appropriate oversight and review of clinical trial conduct and results. Similarly, ASCO also organized its recommendations regarding cancer care delivery around five goals: (1) promote and protect equitable access to high-quality cancer care; (2) support safe delivery of high-quality cancer care; (3) advance policies to ensure oncology providers have sufficient resources to provide high-quality patient care; (4) recognize and address threats to clinician, provider, and patient well-being; and (5) improve patient access to high-quality cancer care via telemedicine. ASCO will work at all levels to advance the recommendations made in this report.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Laura A Levit
- American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | | | | | - Sibel Blau
- Northwest Medical Specialties, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | | | - Mithat Gonen
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | - Tari King
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Todd A Pickard
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Barry Russo
- The Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Fort Worth, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Robin Zon
- Michiana Hematology Oncology, Niles, MI
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Deborah Kamin
- American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
O'Shea A, Tam AL, Kilcoyne A, Flaherty KT, Lee SI. Image-guided biopsy in the age of personalised medicine: strategies for success and safety. Clin Radiol 2020; 76:154.e1-154.e9. [PMID: 32896425 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2020.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Oncology has progressed into an era of personalised medicine, whereby the therapeutic regimen is tailored to the molecular profile of the patient's cancer. Determining personalised therapeutic options is achieved by using tumour genomics and proteomics to identify the specific molecular targets against which candidate drugs can interact. Several dozen targeted drugs, many for multiple cancer types are already widely in clinical use. Molecular profiling of tumours is contingent on high-quality biopsy specimens and the most common method of tissue sampling is image-guided biopsy. Thus, for radiologists performing these biopsies, the paradigm has now shifted away from obtaining specimens simply for histopathological diagnosis to acquiring larger amounts of viable tumour cells for DNA, RNA, or protein analysis. These developments have highlighted the central role now played by radiologists in the delivery of personalised cancer care. This review describes the principles of molecular profiling assays and biopsy techniques for optimising yield, and describes a scoring system to assist in patient selection for percutaneous biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A O'Shea
- Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
| | - A L Tam
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - A Kilcoyne
- Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - K T Flaherty
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - S I Lee
- Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Saini KS, de las Heras B, Plummer R, Moreno V, Romano M, de Castro J, Aftimos P, Fredriksson J, Bhattacharyya GS, Olivo MS, Schiavon G, Punie K, Garcia-Foncillas J, Rogata E, Pfeiffer R, Orbegoso C, Morrison K, Curigliano G, Chin L, Saini ML, Rekdal Ø, Anderson S, Cortes J, Leone M, Dancey J, Twelves C, Awada A. Reimagining Global Oncology Clinical Trials for the Postpandemic Era: A Call to Arms. JCO Glob Oncol 2020; 6:1357-1362. [PMID: 32897732 PMCID: PMC7529519 DOI: 10.1200/go.20.00346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kamal S. Saini
- Covance, Princeton, NJ,East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Ipswich, United Kingdom,Kamal S. Saini, MD, MBBS, Covance, 206 Carnegie Center, Princeton, NJ 08540-6233; Twitter: @KSainiMD; e-mail:
| | | | - Ruth Plummer
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Victor Moreno
- START Madrid-FJD, Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Philippe Aftimos
- Oncology Medicine Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Gaia Schiavon
- R&D Oncology, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Kevin Punie
- Department of General Medical Oncology and Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jesus Garcia-Foncillas
- University Hospital Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ernesto Rogata
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Patient and Public Involvement Group, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milan, Italy,University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Lynda Chin
- Apricity Health, Houston, TX,Dell Medical School at the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
| | | | | | | | - Javier Cortes
- IOB Institute of Oncology, Quiron Group, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Janet Dancey
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chris Twelves
- University of Leeds and Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Ahmad Awada
- Oncology Medicine Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lamarca A, Kapacee Z, Breeze M, Bell C, Belcher D, Staiger H, Taylor C, McNamara MG, Hubner RA, Valle JW. Molecular Profiling in Daily Clinical Practice: Practicalities in Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma and Other Biliary Tract Cancers. J Clin Med 2020; 9:E2854. [PMID: 32899345 PMCID: PMC7563385 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9092854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Revised: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Molecular profiling is becoming increasingly relevant in the management of patients with advanced cancer; to identify targetable aberrations and prognostic markers to enable a precision medicine strategy. METHODS Eligible patients were those diagnosed with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) including intrahepatic (iCCA) and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (eCCA), gallbladder cancer (GBC), and ampullary carcinoma (Amp) who underwent molecular profiling between April 2017 and June 2020 based on analysis of either tumour samples (FoundationOne CDx®/Oncomine® platforms) or ctDNA (FoundationOne Liquid® platform (Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA)). Baseline patient characteristics and molecular profiling outcomes were extracted. The primary aim was to describe sample failure rate. Secondary aims included description of reason for sample failure, summary of findings derived from molecular profiling, and assessment of concordance between paired tissue and ctDNA samples. RESULTS A total of 149 samples from 104 individual patients diagnosed with advanced BTC were identified and eligible for this analysis: 68.2% iCCA, 100% advanced stage; 94.2% received palliative therapy. The rate of sample failure was 26.8% for tissue and 15.4% for ctDNA; p-value 0.220, predominantly due to insufficient (defined as <20%) tumour content in the sample (the reason for 91.2% of tissue sample failure). Of the 112 samples successfully analysed, pathological molecular findings were identified in the majority of samples (88.4%) and identification of pathological findings using ctDNA, was possible regardless of whether the patient was on active treatment at time of blood acquisition or not (p-value 1.0). The rate of targetable alterations identified was 40.2% across all successfully-analysed samples (39 iCCA; 6 non-iCCA): IDH1 mutations (19.1% of individual patients), FGFR2 alterations (10.1% and 5.6% of individual patients had FGFR2 fusions and mutations, respectively); 10.6% of all patients (12.4% of patients with successfully analysed samples) entered trials with matched targeted therapies as a consequence. Concordance of findings for paired tissue and paired tissue-ctDNA was high (3/3; 100% and 6/6; 100%, respectively). Twelve ctDNA samples were taken prior to palliative treatment initiation, median maximum mutant allele frequency (MAF) was 0.47 (range 0.21-19.8); no significant association between reported maximum MAF and progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) (all Cox regression p-values > 0.273). A total of 15 patients (16.6%) harboured alterations in DNA damage repair (DDR) genes; when treated with platinum-based chemotherapy, there was a trend towards increased partial response rate (21.4% vs. 15.9%; p-value 0.653), radiological benefit rate (64.3% vs. 36.2%; p-value 0.071), and longer OS (median OS 20.4 months (95% CI 7.9-26.7) vs. 13.3 (95 CI 11.0-16.4); Cox Regression HR 0.79 (95% CI 0.39-1.61), p-value 0.527). CONCLUSIONS Molecular profiling is of use for identification of novel therapeutic strategies for patients with advanced BTC (mainly iCCA). One in four archived tissue samples may have insufficient tumour content for molecular profiling; ctDNA-based approaches may overcome these obstacles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Lamarca
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M204BX, UK; (Z.K.); (M.B.); (C.B.); (D.B.); (H.S.); (C.T.); (M.G.M.); (R.A.H.); (J.W.V.)
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M204BX, UK
| | - Zainul Kapacee
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M204BX, UK; (Z.K.); (M.B.); (C.B.); (D.B.); (H.S.); (C.T.); (M.G.M.); (R.A.H.); (J.W.V.)
| | - Michael Breeze
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M204BX, UK; (Z.K.); (M.B.); (C.B.); (D.B.); (H.S.); (C.T.); (M.G.M.); (R.A.H.); (J.W.V.)
| | - Christopher Bell
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M204BX, UK; (Z.K.); (M.B.); (C.B.); (D.B.); (H.S.); (C.T.); (M.G.M.); (R.A.H.); (J.W.V.)
| | - Dean Belcher
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M204BX, UK; (Z.K.); (M.B.); (C.B.); (D.B.); (H.S.); (C.T.); (M.G.M.); (R.A.H.); (J.W.V.)
| | - Helen Staiger
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M204BX, UK; (Z.K.); (M.B.); (C.B.); (D.B.); (H.S.); (C.T.); (M.G.M.); (R.A.H.); (J.W.V.)
| | - Claire Taylor
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M204BX, UK; (Z.K.); (M.B.); (C.B.); (D.B.); (H.S.); (C.T.); (M.G.M.); (R.A.H.); (J.W.V.)
| | - Mairéad G. McNamara
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M204BX, UK; (Z.K.); (M.B.); (C.B.); (D.B.); (H.S.); (C.T.); (M.G.M.); (R.A.H.); (J.W.V.)
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M204BX, UK
| | - Richard A. Hubner
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M204BX, UK; (Z.K.); (M.B.); (C.B.); (D.B.); (H.S.); (C.T.); (M.G.M.); (R.A.H.); (J.W.V.)
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M204BX, UK
| | - Juan W. Valle
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M204BX, UK; (Z.K.); (M.B.); (C.B.); (D.B.); (H.S.); (C.T.); (M.G.M.); (R.A.H.); (J.W.V.)
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M204BX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Voyten J, Holtzman MP, Pantanowitz L, Dhir R, Beasley HS, Cuda J, Monaco SE. Lessons learned from clinical trial queries on small biopsy collections: importance of rapid on-site evaluation. J Am Soc Cytopathol 2020; 9:461-468. [PMID: 32499137 DOI: 10.1016/j.jasc.2020.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Revised: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Small biopsies and cytology specimens have become increasingly important for clinical trials and biomarker testing. Thus, institutions must ensure that adequate lesional material meeting the specifications for a multitude of different protocols is available. This can be achieved using rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE). The aim of the present study was to determine the recent clinical trial biopsy characteristics and study the feedback on these collections at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS Clinical trial biopsies performed at our institution and trial feedback (including "queries") were analyzed from the 2017 to 2019. The query data were reviewed in detail, in addition to any protocol modifications related to biopsy requirements and study protocol changes. RESULTS A total of 698 biopsy collections were performed for clinical trial purposes for 95 trials, with most requiring biopsies at >1 time point (63.2%), for phase I or II trials (92.6%), and for specific tumor types (67.4%). Only 18 of the trials (18.9%) requiring fresh tissue biopsies provided feedback. The feedback included data from 90 cases (12.9%), of which 27 (30.0%) had queries regarding insufficient (n = 10; 37.0%) or borderline (n = 17; 63.0%) tumor tissue. Only 1 (3.7%) of these had had ROSE by cytology. ROSE was performed in accordance with institutional guidelines (45.3%), as required by the study (1.1%), or because of trial modification (5.3%). CONCLUSIONS The present investigation has shown the high volume of clinical trial biopsies managed at our academic cancer center. Feedback from the trials was low at 18.9% and frequently involved suboptimal cases without ROSE used at acquisition. This has led to more widespread adoption of ROSE to mitigate insufficient biopsy specimens and repeat procedures. The high volume of clinical trial biopsies and variability in trial needs necessitates a collaborative multidisciplinary network, including cytology services, to facilitate these important biopsies for patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie Voyten
- Clinical Research Services, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Matthew P Holtzman
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Liron Pantanowitz
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Rajiv Dhir
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - H Scott Beasley
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jackie Cuda
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Sara E Monaco
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Cheng JH, Tiulim JW, Zhou S, El-Khoueiry A, Nieva J. Mandatory Research Biopsy Requirements Delay Initiation of Clinical Trials. Front Oncol 2019; 9:968. [PMID: 31681560 PMCID: PMC6813196 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2019] [Accepted: 09/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: There has been an increasing requirement for fresh tumor tissue to enroll in clinical trials in order to look for specific biomarkers. This has been shown to increase screening duration and increase screen failure rates. It was important to corroborate these results in other centers. Methods: This study is a non-randomized retrospective analysis of patients in one subset of patients seen by research nurses who operated in the standard head/neck and lung team not including patients in the phase 1 program. All patients were enrolled in clinical trials from January 16, 2013 to May 28, 2018 at USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Institute in Los Angeles. Patients who were required to give fresh research biopsies prior to intervention were part of the research biopsy group. Results: In total, 76 patients were analyzed in this study. Thirty-three patients were in the research biopsygroup and 43 patients were in the no biopsy group. Trials that required a fresh biopsy had a longer median screening duration (30 vs. 14 days) than trials that did not require a biopsy (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Our study shows that requiring biopsies prior to clinical trial treatment results in a statistically significant delay in treatment. The informed consent forms that were part of clinical trials involving mandatory research biopsies did not reflect this delay in treatment. However, these delays did not result in a statistically significant decrease in number of days on trial or days until progression of disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sheng Zhou
- LAC+USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Anthony El-Khoueiry
- Department of Medicine, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Jorge Nieva
- Department of Medicine, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Waninger JJ, Green MD, Cheze Le Rest C, Rosen B, El Naqa I. Integrating radiomics into clinical trial design. THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE ITALIAN ASSOCIATION OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE (AIMN) [AND] THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RADIOPHARMACOLOGY (IAR), [AND] SECTION OF THE SOCIETY OF RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL CHEMISTRY AND BIOLOGY 2019; 63:339-346. [PMID: 31527581 DOI: 10.23736/s1824-4785.19.03217-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
In radiomics, quantitative features that describe phenotypic tumor characteristics are derived from radiographic images. Because radiomics generates information from routine medical images, it is a powerful way to non-invasively examine the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of disease, and thus has potential to significantly impact clinical trial design, execution, and ultimately patient care. The aim of this review article is to discuss how radiomics may address some of the current challenges in clinical randomized control trials, and the difficulties of integrating robust and repeatable radiomics analysis into trial design. Each step of the radiomics process, including image acquisition and reconstruction, image segmentation, feature extraction, and computational analysis, requires extensive standardization in order to be successfully incorporated into clinical trials and inform clinical decision making. By addressing these challenges, the potential of radiomics may be realized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica J Waninger
- Department of Medical Education, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Michael D Green
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Benjamin Rosen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Issam El Naqa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA -
| |
Collapse
|