Late intensification chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation in selected small-cell carcinoma of the lung: a randomized study

Novel Cytotoxic Chemotherapies in Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is one of the deadliest thoracic neoplasms, in part due to its fast doubling time and early metastatic spread. Historically, cytotoxic chemotherapy consisting of platinum-etoposide or anthracycline-based regimens has demonstrated a high response rate, but early chemoresistance leads to a poor prognosis in advanced SCLC. Only a fraction of patients with limited-disease can be cured by chemo-radiotherapy. Given the disappointing survival rates in advanced SCLC, new cytotoxic agents are eagerly awaited. Unfortunately, few novel chemotherapy drugs have been developed in the latest decades. This review describes the results and potential application in the clinical practice of novel chemotherapy agents for SCLC.

Stem Cell Applications for Treatment of Cancer and Autoimmune Diseases: Its Promises, Obstacles, and Future Perspectives

Since the original discovery of stem cells, a new era of promising results has emerged in the clinical application of stem cells for the treatment of several important diseases, including cancer and autoimmune diseases. The plentiful research on stem cells during the past decades has provided significant information on the developmental, morphological, and physiological processes that govern tissue and organ formation, maintenance, and regeneration; cellular differentiation; molecular processes; and tissue homeostasis. In this review, we present the history of the use of stem cells in different clinical applications. Furthermore, we discuss the various therapeutic options for stem cells in cancer, followed by the role of stem cells in the treatment of autoimmune disorders. Additionally, we highlight the risks of and obstacles to the application of stem cells in clinical practice. Ultimately, we show future perspectives in stem cell use, with an aim to improve the clinical usefulness of stem cells.

High-dose Chemotherapy in Small Cell Lung Cancer

Improvements in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) therapy with conventional doses of drugs with or without radiotherapy have been poor, and the 5-year survival is discouraging. Since SCLC is highly sensitive to radiotherapy and chemotherapy, some studies have tried to improve survival by increasing the dose of the drugs. Within conventional ranges, dose intensity can be increased with the support of hematopoietic growth factors (G/GM-CSF) and/or shortening treatment intervals (eg weekly regimens). However, dose intensity could be increased by only 20-30% and a survival advantage was not definitively obtained. Given its high chemosensitivity already two decades ago, SCLC was one of the first malignancies deemed suitable for maximizing dose and dose intensity with the support of autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT). On the whole, results were disappointing and the procedure was nearly abandoned. Nowadays, some interest is emerging again due to the improvements in supportive care such as the availability of hematopoietic growth factors and the peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC).

SABR for aggressive local therapy of metastatic cancer: A new paradigm for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

Metastectomy has been performed for many years in situations where the functional consequences allow it, for example in the liver, lung, adrenal glands, and ovaries. This history suggests that selected patients may benefit from aggressive treatment of metastases. Technological developments now allow for ablative treatment of other tumor sites and perhaps for larger volume and/or increasing multiplicity of disease using Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy (SABR) with relatively lower risk of morbidity to patients. Here we further explore the concept of aggressive local treatment of metastatic disease in adult patients and review the rationale for use of SABR to treat metastases and highlight new data supporting this approach in metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

NCIC CTG IND.190 phase I trial of dalotuzumab (MK-0646) in combination with cisplatin and etoposide in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer

The insulin-like growth factor receptor is a potential target in small-cell lung cancer. We conducted a phase I study of cisplatin, etoposide plus dalotuzumab. Two dose levels of dalotuzumab (DL1 5 mg/kg, DL2 10mg/kg IV weekly) were evaluated in combination with cisplatin (25 mg/m²) and etoposide (100 mg/m²) IV D1-3, every 21 days, for patients with chemotherapy-naive extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. Primary outcome was determination of the recommended phase 2 dose. Secondary outcomes included response rate and toxicity. Twelve patients were treated (DL1, 3 and DL2, 9). The median age was 63 years (48-70), with six males and six females. The majority of patients were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 1 and had four or more sites of disease. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in DL1 or DL2, although one patient died from neutropenic sepsis in an expanded cohort at DL2. The recommended phase 2 dose of dalotuzumab was 10 mg/kg/week. The confirmed objective response rate was 67% (partial response 8, stable disease 2, progressive disease 1, nonevaluable 1). Grade 3 or higher toxicities (any cycle) occurring in more than one patient included: neutropenia (92%); thrombocytopenia (25%); leukopenia (50%); anemia (17%); fatigue (33%); joint pain (17%); thrombosis (25%). Grade 2 or 3 hyperglycemia was observed in one of three (DL1) and five of nine (DL2) patients. Eight serious adverse events (thrombosis, febrile neutropenia, infection, syncope, fatigue [2], dyspnea, back pain) were observed in three patients. Dalotuzumab can be combined at full dose with standard doses of cisplatin and etoposide. The observed toxicities are consistent with that expected from cisplatin and etoposide except for hyperglycemia, which seems to be dose dependent.

Ganitumab for the treatment of small-cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for 15 - 20% of all lung cancer cases with few advances made in the systemic treatment and outcomes for extensive-stage SCLC. Many strategies have been evaluated over the past 15 years but none of these approaches has resulted in improved survival rates for patients with SCLC. The IGF receptor (IGF-R) pathway represents a potential actionable target in SCLC patients. Indeed, the IGF-R pathway is involved in cancer development and progression and regulates different vital processes including fetal development, growth and metabolism.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides an overview of insulin inhibitors and the strategies undertaken in recent years with SCLC. Specifically, the article discusses ganitumab and its applicability to SCLC patients.

EXPERT OPINION

At present, there is a lack of therapeutic choices for patients with advanced SCLC. Unfortunately, ganitumab, administered in combination with chemotherapy, demonstrated no clinical activity in patients with SCLC, although it could have utility with other cancers. Furthermore, insulin inhibitors may have some utility in the treatment of SCLC and further studies are required to identify subsets of patients most likely to benefit from their use. The authors also believe that it is important to determine the exact role of the IGF pathway in the pathogenesis and propagation of SCLC.

Treatment of small cell lung cancer

Treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains a significant challenge for the oncologists. Attempts to improve the results of first-line treatment have all failed so far and no real progress has been made in last years, emphasizing the need for novel strategies of treatment and the development of validated biomarkers. Patients with limited disease and good performance status should be considered for concomitant chemoradiotherapy, followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation. Patients with extensive disease should be treated with a platinum-based chemotherapy (cisplatin or carboplatin); chest radiotherapy can be considered in patients achieving extra-thoracic complete response and prophylactic cranial irradiation is recommended for patients responsive to initial chemotherapy. A large number of molecular-targeted drugs and immunomodulators are currently in clinical development: however, only a better understanding of molecular biology of SCLC and the identification of molecular markers predictive of response to targeted agents will lead to advances in the treatment of SCLC.

Chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer: a comprehensive review

Combination chemotherapy is the current strategy of choice for treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Platinum containing combination regimens are superior to non-platinum regimens in limited stage-SCLC and possibly also in extensive stage-SCLC as first and second-line treatments. The addition of ifosfamide to platinum containing regimens may improve the outcome but at the price of increased toxicity. Suboptimal doses of chemotherapy result in inferior survival. Early intensified, accelerated and high-dose chemotherapy gave conflicting results and is not considered a standard option outside of clinical trials. A number of newer agents have provided promising results when used in combination regimens, for example, gemcitabine, irinotecan and topotecan. However, more studies are required to appropriately evaluate them. There is a definitive role for radiotherapy in LD-SCLC. However, timing and schedule are subject to further research. Novel approaches are currently being investigated in the hope of improving outcome.

Extensive disease small cell lung cancer dose-response relationships: implications for resistance mechanisms

BACKGROUND

Some studies (but not others) suggested that high doses are beneficial in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). We hypothesized that dose-response curve (DRC) shape reflects resistance mechanisms.

METHODS

We reviewed published SCLC clinical trials and converted response rates into estimated mean tumor cell kill, assuming killing is proportional to reduction in tumor volume. Mean % cell survival was plotted versus planned dose intensity. Nonlinear and linear meta-regression analyses (weighted according to the number of patients in each study) were used to assess DRC characteristics.

RESULTS

Although associations between dose and cell survival were not statistically significant, DRCs sloped downward for five of seven agents across all doses and for all seven when lowest doses were excluded. Maximum mean cell kill across all drugs and doses was approximately 90%, suggesting that there may be a maximum achievable tumor cell kill irrespective of number of agents or drug doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Downward DRC slopes suggest that maintaining relatively high doses may possibly maximize palliation, although the associations between dose and slope did not achieve statistical significance, and slopes for most drugs tended to be shallow. DRC flattening at higher doses would preclude cure and would suggest that "saturable passive resistance" (deficiency of factors required for cell killing) limits maximum achievable cell kill. An example of factors that could flatten the DRC at higher doses and lead to saturable passive resistance would be presence of quiescent, noncycling cells.

Stem cells in clinical practice: applications and warnings

Stem cells are a relevant source of information about cellular differentiation, molecular processes and tissue homeostasis, but also one of the most putative biological tools to treat degenerative diseases. This review focuses on human stem cells clinical and experimental applications. Our aim is to take a correct view of the available stem cell subtypes and their rational use in the medical area, with a specific focus on their therapeutic benefits and side effects. We have reviewed the main clinical trials dividing them basing on their clinical applications, and taking into account the ethical issue associated with the stem cell therapy.

Efficacy of intensified chemotherapy with hematopoietic progenitors in small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis of the published literature

OBJECTIVE

It remains controversial whether intensified chemotherapy with hematopoietic progenitors (ICHP) is effective for small-cell lung cancer. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICHP in patients with small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for English-language studies published through October 12, 2008. Randomized phase II and III clinical trials comparing ICHP with control therapy. Response rates, overall survival, and toxicity were analyzed.

RESULTS

Five assessable trials were identified including 641 patients. No significant increase in the odds ratio for response was attributable to ICHP (odds ratio, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-1.93; p=0.206). No statistically significant increase in overall survival was found when ICHP were compared to control regimens (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.10; p=0.432). The toxicity of ICHP was significantly higher for hematologic toxicity, including hemoglobin nadir and platelet nadir.

CONCLUSIONS

ICHP was not superior to control chemotherapy in terms of both objective response and overall survival, and was related to more significant hemoglobin nadir and platelet nadir.

Small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer accounts for approximately 15% of bronchogenic carcinomas. It is the cancer most commonly associated with various paraneoplastic syndromes, including the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion, paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration, and Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. Because of the high propensity of small cell lung cancer to metastasize early, surgery has a limited role as primary therapy. Although the disease is highly sensitive to chemotherapy and radiation, cure is difficult to achieve. The combination of platinum and etoposide is the accepted standard chemotherapeutic regimen. It is also the accepted standard therapy in combination with thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) for limited-stage disease. Adding TRT increases absolute survival by approximately 5% over chemotherapy alone. Thoracic radiotherapy administered concurrently with chemotherapy is more efficacious than sequential therapy. Furthermore, the survival benefit is greater if TRT is given early rather than late in the course of chemotherapy. Regardless of disease stage, no relevant survival benefit results from increased chemotherapy dose intensity or dose density, altered mode of administration (eg, alternating or sequential administration) of various chemotherapeutic agents, or maintenance chemotherapy. Prophylactic cranial radiation prevents central nervous system recurrence and can improve survival. In Japan and some other Asian countries, the combination of irinotecan and cisplatin is the standard chemotherapeutic regimen. Clinical trials using thalidomide, gefitinib, imatinib, temsirolimus, and farnesyltransferase inhibitors have not shown clinical benefit. Other novel agents such as bevacizumab have shown promising early results and are being evaluated in larger trials.

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem cell support for solid tumors in adults

Supported by experimental evidence and convincing results of early phase II studies, since the 1980s high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous hematopoietic stem cell support (AHSCT) has been uncritically adopted by many oncologists as a potentially curative option for several solid tumors. As a result, the number (and size) of randomized trials comparing this approach with conventional chemotherapy initiated (and often abandoned before completion) in this setting was limited and the benefit of a greater escalation of dose of chemotherapy with stem cell transplantation in solid tumors remains, with the possible exception of breast carcinoma (BC) and germ cell tumors (GCT), largely unsettled. In this article, we review and comment on the data from studies to date of HDC for solid tumors in adults.

Increasing Chemotherapy in Small‐Cell Lung Cancer: From Dose Intensity and Density to Megadoses

The hypothesis that increasing cytotoxic dose intensity will improve cancer cure rates is compelling. Although supporting evidence for this hypothesis has accrued for several tumor types, including lymphomas, breast cancer, and testicular cancers, it remains unproven. Small-cell lung cancer is extremely chemo- and radiosensitive, with a response rate of 80% achieved routinely, but few patients are cured by chemoradiotherapy. In this setting, increased cytotoxic dose intensity might improve cure rates. The finding that response rates in small-cell lung cancer correlate with received cytotoxic dose intensity merely confirms that "less is worse" and "more is better." Within conventional ranges, dose intensity can be increased with the support of hematopoietic growth factors and/or by shortening treatments intervals; however, dose intensity could be increased by only 20%-30%, and a survival advantage has not been clearly demonstrated. Given its high chemosensitivity, small-cell lung cancer was one of the first malignancies deemed suitable for increasing dose intensity and even for the use of a megadose with the support of autologous bone marrow transplantation. Some interest is emerging again due to improvements in supportive care, such as the availability of hematopoietic growth factors and peripheral blood progenitor cells.

The association of chemotherapy induced neutropenia on treatment outcomes in small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy induced neutropenia has been shown to be associated with improved treatment outcomes in selected solid tumours. We studied the association of chemotherapy induced neutropenia with treatment related outcomes in small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of patients receiving chemotherapy for SCLC at the Royal Marsden Hospital, UK over an 8 year period. The chemotherapy included Carboplatin AUC 5, IV and Etoposide 100mg/m(2) IV on day 1 and 100mg/m(2) PO, B.I.D. on day 2 and 3 every 21 days. Patients were stratified into two groups (A) those experiencing grades 0-2 neutropenia and group (B) those experiencing grades 3-4 neutropenia. The outcomes studied were response rate, time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

173 patients were studied. The median age 64 (range 39-83) and M/F ratio was 112:61. The response rates in groups A and B was 90% versus 90%, p=1.0. The median TTP in groups A and B was 30 and 38 weeks, p=0.05. The median OS in groups A and B was 47 weeks versus 60 weeks, p=0.008. The differences in TTP and OS were not significant in patients with extensive stage disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Occurrence of chemotherapy induced grade 3 or 4 neutropenia correlated with OS in patients with SCLC receiving carboplatin and etoposide chemotherapy. Trials exploring controlled, safe intra-patient dose escalation with the intent of achieving grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in patients with SCLC are warranted.

High-dose chemotherapy for male germ cell tumor

Today, 20-30% of male patients with advanced germ cell tumor (GCT) do not have durable, complete remission in spite of cis-platinum (CDDP)-based chemotherapy. High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) has been tried in CDDP refractory GCT patients. Initially HDCT was performed with autologous bone marrow transplantation in heavily treated patients. However, the clinical outcome was not good and the treatment-related death rate was not ignorable. Therefore, earlier introduction of HDCT with peripheral blood stem cell transplantation was preferable as it renders HDCT more effective and less toxic, and multicycle HDCT is feasible. The durable free rate of recent HDCT for refractory GCT patients is 32-65%. HDCT is also performed as first line chemotherapy for poor prognosis GCT patients. Induction chemotherapy followed by multicycles of HDCT was tried. The durable free rate of recent HDCT as first line chemotherapy is 43-73%. Although previous reports suggest the superiority of HDCT, one recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) failed to show an improvement with one cycle of HDCT followed by three cycles of standard-dose chemotherapy (SDCT) compared with four cycles of SDCT. Ongoing RCT comparing multicycles of HDCT with SDCT for poor prognostic GCT patients will clarify the role of HDCT. Recently, new regimens of HDCT containing paclitaxel have been devised. In this review, the history, current status and future of HDCT for advanced or refractory GCT will be discussed.

High dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem cell support for solid tumors other than breast cancer in adults

Since the early 1980s high dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem cell support was adopted by many oncologists as a potentially curative option for solid tumors, supported by a strong rationale from laboratory studies and apparently convincing results of early phase II studies. As a result, the number and size of randomized trials comparing this approach with conventional chemotherapy initiated (and often abandoned before completion) to prove or disprove its value was largely insufficient. In fact, with the possible exception of breast carcinoma, the benefit of a greater escalation of dose of chemotherapy with stem cell support in solid tumors is still unsettled and many oncologists believe that this approach should cease. In this article, we critically review and comment on the data from studies of high dose chemotherapy so far reported in adult patients with small cell lung cancer, ovarian cancer, germ cell tumors and sarcomas.

Double-cycle, high-dose ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide followed by peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation for small cell lung cancer

PURPOSES

To determine the tolerability and feasibility of double-cycle, high-dose chemotherapy followed by peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation (PBSCT) after conventional chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with previously untreated SCLC received two cycles of cisplatin, 80 mg/m2, and etoposide, 300 mg/m2 (cisplatin-etoposide [PE]). Later, they were administered high-dose etoposide, 1,500 mg/m2, followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for collection of peripheral blood stem cells. After two additional cycles of PE, the patients received high-dose ifosfamide, 10 g/m2, carboplatin, 1,200 mg/m2, and etoposide, 1,000 mg/m2 (ifosfamide-carboplatin-etoposide [ICE]) followed by PBSCT twice at 3-month to 4-month intervals. Patients with limited disease (LD) concurrently received 50 Gy of irradiation with the last two cycles of PE.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients, including 11 patients with LD, were enrolled. Fifteen patients could receive high-dose ICE followed by PBSCT twice, and 3 patients could receive it once. The median number of CD34+ cells collected was 13.11 x 10(6)/kg. The median numbers of days to neutrophil counts > or = 500/microL and platelet counts > or = 50,000/microL were 10 days and 14.5 days after the first PBSCT, and 10 days and 15 days after the second PBSCT, respectively. Grade 3 diarrhea occurred in one cycle, and grade 3 renal toxicity occurred in two cycles. The overall response rate was 100%, with an 83.3% rate of complete or near-complete response. The 2-year and 5-year survival rates were 72% and 55% in patients with LD and 43% and 0% in patients with extensive disease, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Double-cycle, high-dose ICE therapy followed by PBSCT is tolerable and feasible even after conventional chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in patients with SCLC.

Phase III study of adjuvant vaccination with Bec2/bacille Calmette-Guerin in responding patients with limited-disease small-cell lung cancer (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 08971-08971B; Silva Study)

PURPOSE

Bec2 is an anti-idiotypic antibody that mimics GD3, a ganglioside that is expressed on the surface of tumor cells and is of neuroectodermal origin. We assessed whether Bec2/bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccination prolongs survival in patients with limited-disease small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) after a major response to chemotherapy and chest radiation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive five vaccinations of Bec2 (2.5 mg)/BCG vaccine or follow-up. Vaccination was given over a 10-week period. The sample size was targeted to detect an increase in median survival of 40% after random assignment, and stratification was by performance status, response, and institution. Quality of life was assessed by using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer instrument. Humoral response was assessed in patients who received vaccination.

RESULTS

A total of 515 patients were randomly assigned. The primary toxicities of vaccination were transient skin ulcerations and mild flu-like symptoms. There was no improvement in survival, progression-free survival, or quality of life in the vaccination arm. Median survival from randomization was 16.4 and 14.3 months in the observation and vaccination arms (P = .28), respectively. Among vaccinated patients, a trend toward prolonged survival was observed in those (one third) who developed a humoral response (P = .085). Multivariate analysis showed a positive impact on survival by prior treatment with concomitant chemoradiotherapy, prophylactic cranial irradiation, female sex, low lactate dehydrogenase, and normal platelets.

CONCLUSION

Vaccination with Bec2/BCG has no impact on outcome of patients with limited-disease SCLC responding to combined-modality treatment. Vaccination strategies in SCLC may still be warranted using vaccines that produce a better immunologic response.

Small-cell lung cancer

Small-cell lung carcinoma is an aggressive form of lung cancer that is strongly associated with cigarette smoking and has a tendency for early dissemination. Increasing evidence has implicated autocrine growth loops, proto-oncogenes, and tumour-suppressor genes in its development. At presentation, the vast majority of patients are symptomatic, and imaging typically reveals a hilar mass. Pathology, in most cases of samples obtained by bronchoscopic biopsy, should be undertaken by pathologists with pulmonary expertise, with the provision of additional tissue for immunohistochemical stains as needed. Staging should aim to identify any evidence of distant disease, by imaging of the chest, upper abdomen, head, and bones as appropriate. Limited-stage disease should be treated with etoposide and cisplatin and concurrent early chest irradiation. All patients who achieve complete remission should be considered for treatment with prophylactic cranial irradiation, owing to the high frequency of brain metastases in this disease. Extensive-stage disease should be managed by combination chemotherapy, with a regimen such as etoposide and cisplatin administered for four to six cycles. Thereafter, patients with progressive or recurrent disease should be treated with additional chemotherapy. For patients who survive long term, careful monitoring for development of a second primary tumour is necessary, with further investigation and treatment as appropriate.

Clinical trials report on ongoing trials in lung cancer

This review summarises major studies that are underway in the treatment of lung cancer in the world. A large number of small Phase I and II trials are being performed, in particular including new cytotoxic agents. This review focuses on randomised Phase III trials, and those mainly conducted by large co-operative groups.

Relevance of high-dose chemotherapy in solid tumours

Drug resistance is a major problem in the treatment of solid tumours. Based on a steep dose-response relationship for especially alkylating agents on tumour cell survival, high-dose chemotherapy was considered of interest for the treatment of solid tumours. Results of phase 1 and 2 studies with high-dose chemotherapy in a variety of tumour types showed good response rates. Nowadays, several phase 3 studies are available especially in metastatic and high-risk breast cancer patients. The high expectations of high-dose chemotherapy did not come true. This review analyses results of randomised studies and comments on the discrepancy between findings in patients versus those in tissue culture. Potential factors involved are the presence of tumour stem cells with different characteristics from more mature tumour cells, limitations in drug escalation in the clinic, transplant mortality, trial design and tumour cell contamination of the haematopoietic stem cell transplant. Maturation of the results from recent studies indicating a more modest benefit in, e.g., adjuvant breast cancer balanced versus long-term side effects will ultimately determine the role of high-dose chemotherapy in certain solid tumours. In case of well-defined indications for high-dose chemotherapy, further selection of patients based on patient and tumour characteristics as well as the introduction of new agents will most likely play a role.

Chemotherapy strategies in the treatment of small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is the most prevalent, yet most preventable malignancy worldwide. Given the tendency of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) to early relapse and its subsequent resistance to treatment, there is an urgent need to optimize standard treatment strategies and develop new treatments. Over the last decade, several strategies have been adopted and advances in the molecular biology of lung cancer have identified a number of targets for future therapy. In this article, we review chemotherapy strategies that have been evaluated in the management of patients with SCLC.

Stem-cell transplantation for the treatment of advanced solid tumors

Over the past two decades, high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) has been explored for a variety of solid tumors in adults, particularly breast cancer, ovarian cancer and non-seminomatous germ-cell tumors. The results of prospective phase II studies seemed superior in many cases to the outcome expected with standard-dose chemotherapy (SDC). The value of HDC for adult solid tumors remains, in most instances, a controversial issue, currently under the scrutiny of randomized phase III trial evaluation. ASCT pursuing an immune graft-versus-tumor effect has been evaluated in recent years for patients with advanced and refractory solid malignancies. This article reviews the results of the main phase II and III studies of HDC with ASCT, as well as the preliminary experience using allogeneic transplantation for solid tumors.

Progress in the therapy of small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 14% of all cases of lung cancer. Combination chemotherapy is the most effective treatment modality for SCLC and recently, several new active drugs have emerged. Combinations of platinum agents with CPT-11 or gemcitabine have been successfully compared in phase III trials against the cisplatin/etoposide standard. Modest improvements in the outcome of patients with SCLC have been noted over the last two decades. Thoracic irradiation given concurrently with chemotherapy improves survival compared with sequential chemotherapy and radiation, but this approach is associated with more toxicity. Moreover, the optimal doses and fractionation of thoracic irradiation remain to be determined. Three-dimensional treatment planning is under investigation. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) has established a role in the management of patients who have achieved a complete response to the initial therapy. Novel molecular targeted therapies are among the strategies currently being investigated in SCLC.

Recent advances in management of small-cell lung cancer

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a smoking-related disease with a poor prognosis. While SCLC is usually initially sensitive to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, responses are rarely long lasting. Frustratingly, most patients ultimately relapse, often with increasingly treatment resistant disease. Many strategies have been developed in an attempt to improve treatment outcomes, which have plateaued since the introduction of combination chemotherapy in the 1980s. These include trials of maintenance therapy, and dose intensification, the latter by means of increasing dose density, growth factor support and high dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue. None have been shown to improve patient survival. On the other hand, the integration of concurrent thoracic radiation and prophylactic cranial irradiation has improved the survival outcomes in patients with limited disease. In extensive disease, irinotecan combined with cisplatin has shown promise in improving survival over conventional platinum/etoposide chemotherapy schedules and a confirmatory study is awaited. The future of SCLC treatment may however lie with molecularly targeted therapies, such as antiangiogenesis agents and signal transduction inhibitors, which are being studied at present.

Small cell lung cancer: state of the art and future perspectives

Small cell lung cancer accounts for less than 20% of all lung cancer. The management of this distinct tumor entity differs from the more common non-small cell lung cancer. Primary prevention of smoking exposure remains the most important public health measure. Although small cell lung is an exquisitely chemosensitive disease it remains ultimately fatal for the great majority of patients. Combination chemotherapy regimens have improved response rate and survival of the last three decades. The combination of cisplatin and etoposide has been considered the standard therapy for over a decade. More intensive triplet combination chemotherapy and high-dose chemotherapy have shown improved response rates and survival. Early concomitant and accelerated radiotherapy improves survival in limited stage disease. This review summarizes the current state of the art and future perspectives in detection, staging and standard therapy of small cell lung cancer. Particular emphasis is given to the importance of concomitant and accelerated radiotherapy and consideration of dose-intensive combination chemotherapy regimens.

Vaccine therapy for small cell lung cancer

One novel approach to the treatment of lethal residual disease in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) relies on the induction of a host-immune response to attack chemoresistant tumor cells. Because of its neuroectodermal origin, SCLC has a number of specific antigens that could be capitalized on as immune targets. This article reviews two vaccine strategies currently in clinical study. The anti-idiotype vaccine to the GD3 ganglioside, BEC-2, has recently been tested in a phase III trial. In this trial, patients with SCLC who had completed initial chemotherapy were randomized to observation or vaccination with BEC-2 plus bacillus Calmette-Guerin adjuvant. A series of other trials have established the immunogenicity of several keyhole limpet hemocyanin conjugate vaccines relevant to SCLC, including GM2, Globo H, fucosyl GM1, and polysialic acid. To optimize an immune response against a broad range of tumor phenotypes, these components will be combined into a polyvalent vaccine. A randomized phase II trial of this polyvalent vaccine is planned to start in 2004.

Extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer

Extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) continues to be a difficult management issue. While response rates to therapy are relatively high, durable responses are rare, and long-term survival rates are dismal. Although many attempts have been made to develop new therapies, cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy remains the mainstay in the management of these patients. In this review we highlight recent developments in the treatment and management of this malignancy, and discuss future prospects in treatment.

Chemotherapy and radiotherapy of bronchial carcinoma

The treatment of lung cancer is important as it represents a global health burden. Many therapies are used including surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, laser therapy, stenting, supportive care and biological agents. Treatment for individual patients is best assessed by a multidisciplinary approach. This article focuses on treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer

There were approximately 42,000 new cases of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in 2002. Despite its initial sensitivity to chemotherapy, only 10% of all SCLC patients will have significant long-term survival. Studies have yet to show significant survival advantages for maintenance chemotherapy, and it appears that four to six cycles of chemotherapy is as effective as longer durations. As yet, there is no defined role for dose escalation in the treatment of SCLC. No one chemotherapy combination has exhibited a definitive survival advantage in extensive disease, although it appears that single-agent oral etoposide may be inferior to combination intravenous chemotherapy. In limited disease, however, cisplatin plus etoposide alone or in alternation with cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine is superior to other approaches. There are several new agents with significant activity in SCLC awaiting further study.

Early tandem high-dose ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide therapy with stem cell rescue for small-cell lung cancer: brief report on the results of a phase-I/II trial

OBJECTIVE

High-dose therapy (HDT) for small-cell lung cancer is experimental. Late intensification HDT for chemosensitive disease can increase the number and quality of remissions and prolong relapse-free survival, but has not yet shown impact on overall survival. This is possibly due to resistant residual disease. To overcome the development of resistance, we have tested early intensification tandem HDT.

METHODS

We performed a phase-I/II trial using 1 conventional cycle of ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide (ICE) plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for stem cell recruitment followed by 2 cycles of high-dose ICE with rescue by CD34+ cell-enriched peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Dose escalation was performed for the 2 high-dose ICE cycles. Radiotherapy for limited disease was according to standard protocols.

RESULTS

17 patients were entered: 2 female patients; 15 male patients; median age 53 (range 36-65) years; 2 patients with limited disease, and 15 patients with extensive disease. We treated 4 patients at dose level 1, 11 patients at level 2, and 2 patients at level 3. The maximum tolerable dose was at level 2 with neuropathy being dose-limiting. Overall, toxicity was < or = grade 2 for all patients up to dose level 2 with hematotoxicity being grade 4 for all patients. There were 15 partial remissions (88%), 1 no change (6%), and 1 progressive disease (6%). Median time to progression was 7.9 months. Overall survival was 12.9 months (median).

CONCLUSIONS

Early intensification with this protocol is feasible. Although a comparatively good response rate and median time to progression have been observed in this group dominated by patients with extensive disease, overall survival is short and no substantial long-term survival was found.

Lung cancer--where are we today? Current advances in staging and nonsurgical treatment

Lung cancer remains the commonest cause of cancer death in both men and women in the developed world, although mortality rates for men are dropping. Spiral computed tomography (CT) of the chest in middle-aged, smoking subjects may identify two to four times more lung cancers than a chest X-ray, with more than 70% of tumors being Stage I. The incidence of benign nodules is high, making interpretation difficult. Randomized controlled trials are required to determine whether spiral CT detects lung cancer early enough to improve mortality. Preoperative staging has relied on CT scans, but positron emission tomography scanning has greater sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy than CT and is recommended as the final confirmatory investigation when the CT shows resectable disease. In locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer, there is a small advantage for the addition of chemotherapy to radiotherapy, but no advantage for postoperative radiotherapy. Chemotherapy gives no benefit when given as neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment around surgery. In advanced disease, newer cytotoxic agents confer a small survival advantage over older combinations, but the advantage in median survival over best supportive care remains a few months with modest improvements in quality of life. Survival with small cell lung cancer has shown little increase over the last 15 years despite multiple attempts to manipulate the timing, dose intensity of chemotherapy, and the potential of radiotherapy. Novel therapies are urgently needed for all cell types of lung cancer.

An analysis of chemotherapy dose and dose-intensity in small-cell lung cancer: lessons to be drawn

BACKGROUND

The survival in untreated small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is <3 months. Prognosis has improved with chemotherapy, but remains poor. One of the issues concerning current chemotherapy is whether there is any benefit of increasing chemotherapy dose or dose intensity (DI).

DESIGN

In the present review, 20 randomised studies, published in the period 1980-2001, in which dose or DI of chemotherapy in SCLC were the only variables tested, are analysed. The studies were categorised as follows: (i) number of cycles (treatment duration); (ii) dose per cycle; (iii) interval between cycles (dose densification); and (iv) a combination of these variables.

RESULTS

(i) With treatment duration reduced to three to six cycles, median survival time (MST) was 2 months shorter, most evident in patients showing a (complete) response to initial chemotherapy. (ii) An improved survival was observed in two out of five high-dose studies. (iii) Survival was increased by 0.6 to 6.2 months in all four densification studies. (iv) Survival was not improved in studies that used dose-escalation and/or -densification in combination with a reduced number of cycles. The sample sizes were too small to be conclusive in most of the individual trials. The median of the MSTs in the 20 trials taken together was 9.8 months for the standard arms and 11.5 months for the intensified arms (i.e. more cycles, higher dose per cycle and/or shorter intervals). After omitting the two trials with reduced number of cycles in the so-called 'high-dose' arm, the median of MSTs was 8.7 and 11.5 months, respectively. There was only a slight improvement (1%) in 2-year survival for all trials taken together. However, when only taking high-dose and dose-densified chemotherapy trials into account, the difference in median 2-year survival became 19% (12% versus 31%).

CONCLUSIONS

The above classification facilitates our understanding about doses of chemotherapy and it makes us appreciate the relevance of the individual determinants. It appears that the number of cycles, dose level, dose density, cumulative dose and DI are all important factors for improving survival. Intensification of chemotherapy still deserves further research in SCLC.

Small-Cell Lung Cancer: State of the Art

Thirty years ago, there was a pervasive atmosphere of pessimism concerning the management of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Surgery or radiation therapy alone resulted in few cures since these techniques utilize a local therapy for a disseminated disease. Chemotherapy remains the backbone of treatment for all patients with SCLC, regardless of stage. For patients with limited-stage disease (LD), the addition of thoracic radiation to chemotherapy is standard. The optimal timing, dose, and schedule of radiation remains undefined. The majority of studies demonstrate equivalent or superior survival for early radiation when compared to delayed radiation. Approximately 50% of patients with LD will achieve a complete remission with chemoradiation and will be candidates for prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI). While phase III trials have failed to demonstrate a statistically significant survival for PCI, brain relapse is clearly reduced, and a metaanalysis reports a small long-term survival advantage favoring patients receiving PCI. Unfortunately, unlike LD SCLC, advances in extensive-stage disease have been elusive, despite the testing of numerous strategies. Four courses of cisplatin (or carboplatin) plus etoposide remain standard first-line therapy. Promising results have been seen with irinotecan/cisplatin, but confirmatory trials are still needed. A plateau has been reached with chemotherapy regimens, and novel strategies are greatly needed to improve survival for patients with SCLC.

High-dose chemotherapy for solid tumors: results of the EBMT

The European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT), formerly known as European Group for Bone Marrow Transplantation, was established in 1974 in the Netherlands to share experiences, to promote research and clinical studies and to set up registries in the field of hematopoietic tissue transplantation. At the present time more 400 European and non-European centers are members of the EBMT group. In 1984 a new Working Party was created (Solid Tumors) with the aim to investigate the role of high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell support in the fields of adult and pediatric solid tumors. By January 2000 more than 14000 patients were registered, and at the present time this Registry is the world largest database on this subject. Several phase III randomized clinical trials have recently started on behalf of the Group in different diseases (breast carcinoma, small cell lung cancer, ovarian carcinoma, germ cell tumors and Ewing's family sarcoma). Hundreds of randomized patients will finally produce clearer information on this still experimental therapeutic modality. This paper will describe the EBMT Solid Tumors Working Party Registry updated results as well as the main ongoing studies.

The role of high-dose chemotherapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

The literature on high-dose chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with autologous bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation does not - as of yet - provide evidence of relevant benefits. At the same time, the significant risks of treatment-related morbidity and mortality associated with dose-intensified chemotherapy in this vulnerable patient population are increasingly recognized. Whether the advent of new cytotoxic agents such as the Taxans or newer Topoisomerase inhibitors will help to improve the hitherto unsatisfying results of high-dose chemotherapy in NSCLC, remains to be determined. The few ongoing studies in the area strive to examine such newer drug-combinations in a multimodality treatment concept combining neo-adjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation with surgery and adjuvant thoracic radiation therapy.

The treatment of limited small cell lung cancer: a report of the progress made and future prospects

The improvements in the treatment of small cell lung cancer over the last 30 years have been realised by understanding that it is a systemic disease, but that areas of bulk and sanctuary require a complementary therapy. Despite successful strategies using combinations and thoracic radiotherapy, there remains uncertainty about what the best regimens are, their timing and their intensity. However, earlier concurrent therapy and rather brief intense chemotherapy and radiotherapy seem to produce the best results in moderately fit patients of all ages. How to select the fit patients and what to do about the less fit ones remains controversial and have economic consequences for governments and payers. Despite a meta-analysis demonstrating the success of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI), doubts linger about its safety, despite nothing more than anecdotal evidence from a previous era. The role of surgery continues to be explored, more in Europe than North America or Asia. Strategies for treatment of minimum residual disease seem a focus. New drugs, molecular targeted therapy, immunotherapy and other molecular therapies offer promise and theory, but there is little evidence about their place in the treatment protocols of today.

Progress in the management and outcome of small-cell lung cancer in a French region from 1981 to 1994

Recent analyses of series of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients included in clinical trials have shown improved survival over time, but it has been impossible to determine whether this was due to selection biases, stage migration, or true therapeutic improvement. To determine if there has been a true improvement of survival over time, we reviewed the medical records of all consecutive patients diagnosed with SCLC between 1981 and 1994 in the Bas-Rhin in France. Among the 787 patients (median age 63), there was no significant period effect for sex, age, or stage. Staging work-ups became increasingly thorough (significant period effect). The mean number of investigations and of tumour sites detected correlated significantly. The chemotherapy rate increased (from 76.4% in 1981-1983 to 91.7% in 1993-1994, P = 10(-5)) and mediastinal irradiation decreased (to roughly 25% of patients after 1983). Median survival time increased for the overall population from 6.6 months in 1981-1983 to 11.3 months in 1993-1994 (P = 10(-5)), for patients with limited disease (LD) from 9.2 (P = 0.002) months to 14.0 months, and for those with extensive (ED) disease from 3.5 months to 9.6 months (P = 10(-5)). Significant independent prognostic factors were disease extent, clinical trial participation, period, type of chemotherapy, and mediastinal irradiation in LD. Survival time has truly improved as 'state of the art' management of SCLC has changed.

Dose intensive chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer

The rationale for treatment intensification is to overcome the occurrence of drug resistance and to improve the outcome in SCLC. Several different approaches have been tested in the past two decades. Increasing the dose of conventional chemotherapy has failed to improve survival in extensive stage. In limited stage patients one randomized trial demonstrated a significant survival advantage by a 20% increase of the dose of cisplatin and cyclophosphamide given during the first cycle of chemotherapy. Shortening treatment intervals is achievable by weekly chemotherapy or by use of hematopoietic growth factors. Neither weekly chemotherapy, tested in four randomized trials, nor the application of hematopoietic growth factors significantly improved survival. However, two studies described a better survival for patients receiving chemotherapy in shorter treatment intervals. In one trial a 3-week interval was superior to a 4-week interval, and in a second one a 2-week interval superior to a 3-week interval. One smaller study, comparing a 4-week interval with a 2-week interval with stem cell augmentation by whole blood, revealed no difference in survival between both groups. A randomized trial comparing chemotherapy in intervals as short as possible with or without growth factor application showed no difference for the two groups. Thus, growth factor application seems not to be essential for treatment in short intervals and was not associated with superior survival in randomized trials. To achieve a more than two-fold increase in dose intensity some kind of stem cell support is mandatory. Several phase II trials with small patient numbers tested the concept of late intensification with bone marrow support in the 1980s. These trials did not show any convincing benefit. There is one randomized trial available testing the late intensification approach in which a superior progression free survival and a trend for better survival was demonstrated, but this difference was not statistically significant due to a high mortality rate and a substantial number of local relapses in the high dose arm. Newer concepts involving high dose therapy are combining high dose strategies with approaches for better local tumor control, administer high dose regimens earlier in the treatment course, or use multiple sequential high dose cycles. With these approaches 3-year survival rates of up to 40% have been reported. So up to date, the superiority of an intensified treatment strategy has not been demonstrated in a convincing way and further controlled trials will be necessary to clarify the role of dose intense chemotherapy in SCLC.