Evaluation of high-dose versus standard FAC chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer in protected environment units: a prospective randomized study

Thioredoxin Decreases Anthracycline Cardiotoxicity, But Sensitizes Cancer Cell Apoptosis

Cardiotoxicity is a major limitation for anthracycline chemotherapy although anthracyclines are potent antitumor agents. The precise mechanism underlying clinical heart failure due to anthracycline treatment is not fully understood, but is believed to be due, in part, to lipid peroxidation and the generation of free radicals by anthracycline-iron complexes. Thioredoxin (Trx) is a small redox-active antioxidant protein with potent disulfide reductase properties. Here, we present evidence that cancer cells overexpressing Trx undergo enhanced apoptosis in response to daunomycin. In contrast, cells overexpressing redox-inactive mutant Trx were not effectively killed. However, rat embryonic cardiomyocytes (H9c2 cells) overexpressing Trx were protected against daunomycin-mediated apoptosis, but H9c2 cells with decreased levels of active Trx showed enhanced apoptosis in response to daunomycin. We further demonstrate that increased level of Trx is specifically effective in anthracycline toxicity, but not with other topoisomerase II inhibitors such as etoposide. Collectively these data demonstrate that whereas high levels of Trx protect cardiomyocytes against anthracycline toxicity, it potentiates toxicity of anthracyclines in cancer cells.

Carboplatin and Oral Etoposide in the Treatment of Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer Refractory to Anthracyclines

Aims and Background

To determine the efficacy and toxicity of the carboplatin and oral etoposide combination in patients with advanced breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines.

Methods

Twenty-seven patients were treated with a maximum of 6 cycles of carboplatin (300 mg/m2) and etoposide (200 mg/m2) every 4 weeks. Prior treatment with an anthracycline was given as adjuvant in 17 patients and as first line treatment for advanced disease in 10 patients.

Results

Only 12 (44 %) patients completed all 6 cycles of chemotherapy. The median administered dose of carboplatin was 72 mg/m2/week and of etoposide 143 mg/m2/week. Two (7.5 %) complete and 4 (15 %) partial responses were observed. Both complete responses occurred in patients who received only mitoxantrone-containing adjuvant treatment, and lasted for 36 and 92+ weeks. The main toxicities included anemia (56 %), leukopenia (56 %), nausea/vomiting (50 %) and alopecia (79 %).

Conclusions

The combination of carboplatin and oral etoposide is effective and should probably be considered as an alternative therapeutic option for patients with advanced breast cancer refractory to anthracyclines.

Combination of 5-Fluorouracil, Imidazole Carboxamide, Bcnu and Prednisolone (FIB-P) as a Salvage Chemotherapy in Heavily Pretreated Breast Cancer Patients

The results of treatment with 5-fluorouracil, imidazole carboxamide, BCNU and prednisolone (FIB-P) salvage chemotherapy in 60 patients with heavily pretreated advanced breast cancer are presented. For most of the patients (82%) this was the third line of chemotherapy. Performance status (ECOG) was 1, 2 and 3 in respectively 13, 27, and 20 patients. Predominant metastatic sites were: soft tissue (3/60, 5%), bone (22/60, 37%), and viscera (35/60, 58%). Tumor burden (number of affected organic systems) was 1, 2 and 3 or more in respectively 18, 24 and 16 patients. Average dose intensity received was 0.74 (range, 0.47–0.98); the average number of cycles was 3.8 (range, 2–8). Objective response (CR + PR) was observed in 22 patients (1 CR, 21 PR), with a response rate of 37% (22/60). Median duration of remission was 7 months (range, 3–15). Tumor burden was the only pretreatment patient characteristic that significantly influenced the remission rate (p < 0.10). Dose intensity significantly affected tumor response (p < 0.05). Toxic side effects (gastrointestinal disorders, alopecia and myelotoxicity) were generally moderate and tolerable. No treatment-related death occurred. FIB-P proved to be an active salvage chemotherapy in heavily pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer.

Outcomes of systemic therapy for advanced triple-negative breast cancer: A single centre experience

BACKGROUND

Prognosis is worse for advanced triple-negative breast cancer (aTNBC) compared to other disease subtypes. Trials describe treatment outcomes in single specified lines of therapy; but few data describe treatment outcomes across the whole treatment pathway, which is critical in determining when patients should be referred for trials and to inform discussion. We evaluated treatment outcomes for aTNBC (overall response rate [ORR], median progression-free survival [mPFS] and median overall survival [mOS]) in patients treated largely outside of clinical trials.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 268 patients diagnosed with aTNBC from 01/12/2011 to 30/11/2016 from our electronic records and recorded patients' and tumour characteristics and treatment outcomes. Chi-squared/Fishers exact test and Kaplan-Meier statistical methods were utilised.

RESULTS

186 patients treated with ≥1 line of systemic treatment were eligible and had median age of 55 (range 26-91). 53.8% had ECOG Performance Status 0 and 69.9% visceral involvement. 38.6% had disease-free interval (DFI)≤12 months following surgery or adjuvant chemotherapy completion and 14.0% had de-novo advanced disease. 11.4% carried a BRCA mutation. 64.5% received two lines of therapy, 37.6% three and 21.5% four. ORR and mPFS were 43.9% and 3.7 months for first-line therapy, 40.2% and 3.5 months for second-line, 28.8% and 2.5 months for third-line and 25.0% and 2.1 months for fourth-line. In first line, DFI>12 months was associated with higher ORR and longer PFS compared DFI ≤12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The observed response rates are consistent with literature. However, PFS is short, and early consideration of clinical trials can be justified in these patients.

DAFODIL: A novel liposome-encapsulated synergistic combination of doxorubicin and 5FU for low dose chemotherapy

PEGylated liposomes have transformed chemotherapeutic use of doxorubicin by reducing its cardiotoxicity; however, it remains unclear whether liposomal doxorubicin is therapeutically superior to free doxorubicin. Here, we demonstrate a novel PEGylated liposome system, named DAFODIL (Doxorubicin And 5-Flurouracil Optimally Delivered In a Liposome) that inarguably offers superior therapeutic efficacies compared to free drug administrations. Delivery of synergistic ratios of this drug pair led to greater than 90% reduction in tumor growth of murine 4T1 mammary carcinoma in vivo. By exploiting synergistic ratios, the effect was achieved at remarkably low doses, far below the maximum tolerable drug doses. Our approach re-invents the use of liposomes for multi-drug delivery by providing a chemotherapy vehicle which can both reduce toxicity and improve therapeutic efficacy. This methodology is made feasible by the extension of the ammonium-sulfate gradient encapsulation method to nucleobase analogues, a liposomal entrapment method once conceived useful only for anthracyclines. Therefore, our strategy can be utilized to efficiently evaluate various chemotherapy combinations in an effort to translate more effective combinations into the clinic.

Acute and late onset cognitive dysfunction associated with chemotherapy in women with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Growing evidence supports cognitive dysfunction associated with standard dose chemotherapy in breast cancer survivors. We determined the incidence, nature, and chronicity of cognitive dysfunction in a prospective longitudinal randomized phase 3 treatment trial for patients with T1-3, N0-1, M0 breast cancer receiving 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide with or without paclitaxel.

METHODS

Forty-two patients underwent a neuropsychological evaluation including measures of cognition, mood, and quality of life. Patients were scheduled to be assessed before chemotherapy, during and shortly after chemotherapy, and 1 year after completion of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Before chemotherapy, 21% (9 of 42) evidenced cognitive dysfunction. In the acute interval, 65% (24 of 37) demonstrated cognitive decline. At the long-term evaluation, 61% (17 of 28) evidenced cognitive decline after cessation of treatment. Within this group of patients, 71% (12 of 17) evidenced continuous decline from the acute interval, and, notably, 29% (5 of 17) evidenced new delayed cognitive decline. Cognitive decline was most common in the domains of learning and memory, executive function, and processing speed. Cognitive decline was not associated with mood or other measured clinical or demographic characteristics, but late decline may be associated with baseline level of performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Standard dose systemic chemotherapy is associated with decline in cognitive function during and shortly after completion of chemotherapy. In addition, delayed cognitive dysfunction occurred in a large proportion of patients. These findings are consistent with a developing body of translational animal research demonstrating both acute and delayed structural brain changes as well as functional changes associated with common chemotherapeutic agents such as 5-fluorouracil.

Surrogate markers and survival in women receiving first-line combination anthracycline chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer

Surrogate markers may help predict the effects of first-line treatment on survival. This metaregression analysis examines the relationship between several surrogate markers and survival in women with advanced breast cancer after receiving first-line combination anthracycline chemotherapy 5-fluorouracil, adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (FAC) or 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC) . From a systematic literature review, we identified 42 randomised trials. The surrogate markers were complete or partial tumour response, progressive disease and time to progression. The treatment effect on survival was quantified by the hazard ratio. The treatment effect on each surrogate marker was quantified by the odds ratio (or ratio of median time to progression). The relationship between survival and each surrogate marker was assessed by a weighted linear regression of the hazard ratio against the odds ratio. There was a significant linear association between survival and complete or partial tumour response (P<0.001, R²=34%), complete tumour response (P=0.02, R²=12%), progressive disease (P<0.001, R²=38%) and time to progression (P<0.0001, R²=56%); R² is the proportion of the variability in the treatment effect on survival that is explained by the treatment effect on the surrogate marker. Time to progression may be a useful surrogate marker for predicting survival in women receiving first-line anthracycline chemotherapy and could be used to estimate the survival benefit in future trials of first-line chemotherapy compared to FAC or FEC. The other markers, tumour response and progressive disease, were less good.

The role of the liposomal anthracyclines and other systemic therapies in the management of advanced breast cancer

For patients whose breast cancers are not responsive to endocrine therapy, there are a large number of cytotoxic drugs that will induce a response. In spite of the introduction of new, very active drugs such as the taxanes, vinorelbine, capecitabine, gemcitabine, and trastuzumab, the anthracyclines are still as active as any--and more active than most--drugs used to treat breast cancer. Their inclusion in combinations to treat early and advanced disease prolongs survival. However, they cause nausea, vomiting, alopecia, myelosuppression, mucositis, and cardiomyopathies. There is no evidence that increasing the dose of conventional anthracyclines or any other of the cytotoxics beyond standard doses will improve outcomes. Schedule may be more important than dose in determining the benefit of cytotoxics used to treat breast cancer. Weekly schedules and continuous infusions of 5-fluorouracil and doxorubicin may have some advantages over more intermittent schedules. Liposomal formations of doxorubicin reduce toxicity, including cardiotoxicity; theoretically they should also be more effective because of better targeting of tumor over normal tissues. Both pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil/Caelyx [PLD]) and liposomal doxorubicin (Myocet [NPLD]) appeared to be as effective as conventional doxorubicin and much less toxic in multiple phase II and phase III studies. PLD has been evaluated in combinations with cyclophosphamide, the taxanes, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, and trastuzumab, and NPLD has been evaluated in combination with cyclophosphamide and trastuzumab. Both liposomal anthracyclines are less cardiotoxic than conventional doxorubicin. The optimal dose of PLD is lower than that of conventional doxorubicin or NPLD. Patients treated with PLD have almost no alopecia, nausea, or vomiting, but its use is associated with stomatitis and hand-foot syndrome, which can be avoided or minimized with the use of proper dose-schedules. In contrast, the optimal dose-schedule of NPLD is nearly identical to that of conventional doxorubicin. The toxicity profile of NPLD is similar to that of conventional doxorubicin, but toxicities are less severe and NPLD is better tolerated than conventional doxorubicin at higher doses.

Modeling multi-drug chemotherapy: tailoring treatment to individuals

BACKGROUND

Predicting and tailoring optimal cancer treatments presents a major challenge.

METHODS

A computational model (kinetically tailored treatment, or KITT model) is developed to predict drug combinations, doses, and schedules likely to be effective in reducing tumor size and prolonging patient life. Treatment strategies may be tailored to individuals based on tumor cell kinetics. The model incorporates intra-tumor heterogeneity and evolution of drug resistance, apoptotic rates, and cell division rates. Tumor growth may follow an exponential or a Gompertzian trajectory. Drug pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic models are used. Toxicity is modeled in several ways.

RESULTS

A key prediction of KITT is that including cytostatic drugs like tamoxifen and herceptin during treatment with cytotoxic drugs substantially increases the probability of cure and prolongs patient life. Results also suggest that altering drug scheduling may be more effective but not more toxic than dose escalation. CAF chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, and 5-fluorouracil) is predicted to be more effective than CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil). KITT also suggests that tumors with a high proliferative index (PI) may respond better to drug combinations incorporating two cell-cycle phase-specific drugs than do tumors with a low PI. Tumors with a low PI, in contrast, are predicted to respond better to regimens involving two cell-cycle phase-non-specific drugs than do tumors with a high PI. These predictions are borne out by clinical trial results published in the literature, which are discussed. Simulated predictions of the model match well with results from a clinical trial by Silvestrini et al. (2000. Int. J. Cancer 87, 405). The results of simulating the growth of 26896 tumors are used to construct a decision tree for prognosis to identify the key tumor and treatment variables.

CONCLUSION

Additional tests of the model are needed in which physicians collect information on apoptotic and proliferative indices, cell-cycle times, and drug resistance from biopsies of each individual's tumor. Computational models may become important tools to help optimize and tailor cancer treatments.

Epirubicin-based chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer patients: role of dose-intensity and duration of treatment

PURPOSE

To determine whether the duration and the dose of epirubicin modify the long-term outcome of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four hundred seventeen anthracycline-naive MBC patients were randomized to receive one of the following regimens: arm A: 11 cycles of fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2), epirubicin 75 mg/m(2), and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2) (FEC 75) every 21 days; arm B: four cycles of FEC 100 (same regimen but with epirubicin 100 mg/m(2)) then eight cycles of FEC 50 (epirubicin 50 mg/m(2)); and arm C: four cycles of FEC 100 then restart the same regimen at disease progression in case of prior response or stabilization.

RESULTS

Hematologic toxicity was similar. Nausea/vomiting and stomatitis were significantly less frequent in arm A as was left ventricular ejection fraction decrease in arm C (A = six patients, B = five patients, and C = one patient). Six patients died of infections (A = four patients and C = two patients). After four cycles, the objective response rate (ORR) was better with FEC 100 than with FEC 75 (49.2% v 40%, respectively; P: =.07). The ORR was better with the longer regimens (arm A, 56.9%; B, 64%; and C, 47.6%; P: =.06) and was 41% after second-line FEC 100. After a median follow-up of 41 months, the response duration and time to progression (TTP) were significantly better with arm B, the longer regimen (P: =.012 and P: < 10(-3), respectively). The median survival times for arms A, B, and C were similar (17.9, 18.9, and 16. 3 months, respectively; P: =.49).

CONCLUSION

In MBC, longer epirubicin-based regimens are better in terms of response duration and TTP. FEC 100 regimens improve the ORR. However, four initial cycles of FEC 100 and identical retreatment at disease progression yielded equivalent overall survival to longer regimens.

[Alternating chemotherapy and hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy in non-metastatic inflammatory breast cancer]

PURPOSE

Based on encouraging results reported in alternating radiotherapy and chemotherapy in inflammatory breast carcinoma, we have tried in this study to optimize locoregional treatment with a hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy schedule alternating with chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From May 1991 to May 1995, 54 patients, previously untreated, with non-metastatic inflammatory breast cancer were entered in an alternating protocol consisting of eight courses of combined chemotherapy and two series of loco-regional hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy with a total dose of 66 Gy. Hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy was started after three courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (Adriamycin, Vincristine, Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, 5-fluoro-uracile) administered every 21 days +/- G.CSF. The first series delivered 45 Gy/three weeks to the breast, the axillary, subclavicular and internal mammary nodes, with two daily sessions of 1.5 Gy separated by an interval of eight hours; the second series consisted of a boost (21 Gy/14 fractions/10 d) alternating with another regimen of anthracycline-based-chemotherapy (a total of five cycles every three weeks). Hormonal treatment was given to all patients.

RESULTS

Of the 53 patients evaluated at the end of the treatment, 44 (83%) had a complete clinical response, seven (13%) had a partial response (> 50%) and two (4%) had tumoral progression. Of the 51 patients who were locally controlled, 18 (35%) presented a locoregional recurrence (LRR); eight (15%) had to undergo a mastectomy. All the patients but two with LRR developed metastases or died of local progressive disease and 26 (50%) developed metastases. With a median follow-up of 39 months (range: 4-74 months), survival rates at three and five years were respectively, 66 and 45% for overall survival and 45 and 36% for disease-free survival.

CONCLUSION

Alternating a combination of chemotherapy and hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy is a well-tolerated regimen which provides acceptable local control. The systemic dissemination remains the major problem of inflammatory breast carcinoma and further clinical trials using alternative drug regimens are warranted.

Systematic reviews of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy in metastatic breast cancer

Metastatic breast cancer is incurable but often responsive to treatment. There is little evidence-based consenus on when to use which treatments, in what combination and for how long. Systematic reviews were performed on 12 prospectively defined, clinically relevant research questions to support the development of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. A comprehensive search of Medline from 1966 to 1996 identified over 1800 controlled trials. Eligibility and data extraction were performed independently by two blinded reviewers. Trial results were summarised by ratios of median survivals (RMS) and P -values for survival curve comparisons with meta-analysis by weighted combination of these statistics. Sixty-five publications reporting 97 treatment comparisons were included. There was moderate evidence that more rather than fewer cycles of chemotherapy improved survival (RMS:1.23, P -0.01). The evidence did not support: higher rather than lower doses of chemotherapy (or of endocrine therapy); any one class of endocrine agent over all others; multiple endocrine agents over a single agent; or, combined chemotherapy and endocrine therapy over either single modality. Only six trials assessed quality of life revealing better quality of life with more rather than fewer cycles of chemotherapy and with standard rather than lower doses of chemotherapy. These systematic reviews reveal counterintuitive evidence useful to everyday practice, in particular that more rather than fewer cycles of chemotherapy lead to better quality of life and longer survival.

Randomized trial of high-dose chemotherapy and blood cell autografts for high-risk primary breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Uncontrolled studies have reported encouraging outcomes for patients with high-risk primary breast cancer treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell support. We conducted a prospective randomized trial to compare standard-dose chemotherapy with the same therapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with 10 or more positive axillary lymph nodes after primary breast surgery or patients with four or more positive lymph nodes after four cycles of primary (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy were eligible. All patients were to receive eight cycles of 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin (Adriamycin), and cyclophosphamide (FAC). Patients were stratified by stage and randomly assigned to receive two cycles of high-dose cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin with autologous hematopoietic stem cell support or no additional chemotherapy. Tamoxifen was planned for postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive tumors and chest wall radiotherapy was planned for all. All P values are from two-sided tests.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight patients (48 after primary surgery and 30 after primary chemotherapy) were registered. Thirty-nine patients were randomly assigned to FAC and 39 to FAC followed by high-dose chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 6.5 years, there have been 41 relapses. In intention-to-treat analyses, estimated 3-year relapse-free survival rates were 62% and 48% for FAC and FAC/high-dose chemotherapy, respectively (P =.35), and 3-year survival rates were 77% and 58%, respectively (P =.23). Overall, there was greater and more frequent morbidity associated with high-dose chemotherapy than with FAC; there was one septic death associated with high-dose chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

No relapse-free or overall survival advantage was associated with the use of high-dose chemotherapy, and morbidity was increased with its use. Thus, high-dose chemotherapy is not indicated outside a clinical trial.

Is òne cycle every three or four weeks' obsolete? A critical review of dose-dense chemotherapy in solid neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Shortening the interval between cycles is one means of increasing the dose intensity of chemotherapy, and can be supported by biological and mathematical rationales. Our objective was to assess the clinical relevance of the rapid repetition of regimens (so-called 'dose-dense chemotherapy') in various solid neoplasms.

DESIGN

The medical literature was reviewed in accord with Mulrow's recommendations. Randomised studies comparing frequently-repeated chemotherapy to standard regimens as well as open studies are described and critically examined.

RESULTS

Dose-dense regimens were widely found to be feasible. In small-cell lung cancer, survival of patients receiving dose-dense regimens was better than that of patients treated by standard chemotherapy in three trials, two of which reached significance, when these intensive regimens allowed better dose intensity. In poor-prognosis germ-cell tumors, a dose-dense regimen was not better than standard therapy, perhaps because of an excessively high toxicity-related death rate. However, recent phase II studies have provided encouraging results. In early breast cancer, the one published randomized study in the adjuvant setting showed only a trend towards better disease-free survival in node-positive women receiving a weekly-repeated regimen. Two randomized trials failed to show any benefit in the neoadjuvant setting with a dose-dense regimen. No evidence of a benefit was provided in metastatic breast cancer. In advanced colorectal cancer, evidence of an improvement in survival with weekly or bi-weekly 5-FU-leucovorin compared to a classic monthly schedule has recently been shown in two randomized trials, and dose-dense regimens are recognized as standard therapy in many countries. Phase II studies of dose-dense regimens have also shown high response rates and long survival in many neoplasms, including Ewing's sarcoma, gestational trophoblastic disease, ovarian carcinoma and gastric cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

A considerable amount of experience has been gained with frequently-repeated regimens. A few randomized trials have demonstrated a benefit for survival on standard chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer and advanced colorectal cancer. However, this benefit appears to be weak. The combination of dose-dense chemotherapy regimens with new anti-cancer strategies based on our insights into the mechanisms of oncogenesis is a challenge on the eve of the millennium.

Is there a role for intensive therapy in breast cancer?

With reference to survival, polychemotherapy has been demonstrated to be statistically significantly more effective than monochemotherapy both in the adjuvant setting and in the metastatic situation. Breast cancer demonstrates a dose-response relationship. Chemotherapy used in the conventional dose range should be given with adequate dose-intensity both in the adjuvant setting and for metastatic patients. More dose-intensive combinations are almost always associated with a higher response rate in patients' metastatic disease, but these results have seldom been translated into an improved survival. For marrow requiring high-dose therapy, repeated phase II studies have demonstrated the possibility of a survival tail, which may be due to stage migration and patient selection. At present we have at least 13 ongoing phase III studies in the adjuvant setting and at least 5 ongoing studies in the metastatic situation. These studies will give a definite answer on whether marrow-supported high-dose therapy is better than conventional therapy or if alternative approaches using tailored therapy will result in an equivalent outcome. In the future we must make better use of the present arsenal of drugs and examine the marked inter-individual variations in pharmacokinetic profiles for the drugs. We have to tailor the therapy to the tumour biological profile, in both the primary tumour and metastases with appreciation of heterogeneity and tumour progression. Based on these prerequisites, therapy can be either dose-intensive or in some instances continuous using lower doses.

Autologous stem-cell transplantation for solid tumors in adults

Over the last decade, high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous stem-cell transplantation has been explored for a variety of solid tumors in adults, particularly breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and nonseminomatous germ-cell tumors. Response of phase II studies are encouraging in most cases, and, in certain settings, seem clearly superior to historical results of conventional-dose chemotherapy. The value of HDC for adult solid tumors is a highly controversial issue, currently being addressed in large randomized phase II trials. This article reviews the results of HDC in different diseases and depicts potential directions of future progress.

High-dose chemotherapy: is it standard management for any common solid tumor?

High-dose chemotherapy with stem-cell support had as its basis the observation of dose-response relationships for many chemotherapeutic agents in laboratory models. The rationale to explore high-dose treatment in the clinic was further enhanced by several retrospective reviews in the 1980s which suggested delivered dose intensity of treatment was an important determinant of patient outcome. The availability of hematopoietic growth factors and technologic advances in the efficiency of stem-cell collection and administration have made the evaluation of exploring high-dose therapy safe and feasible. However, real questions remain regarding the apparently superior results of this treatment in the management of solid tumors. This paper reviews the results of high-dose chemotherapy in breast, ovarian and small cell lung cancers. Firstly the evidence for a dose-response relationship to chemotherapeutic agents in the 'standard' dosage range is examined. Secondly results of non-randomized and, where available, randomized trials of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with stem-cell support are summarized and finally conclusions regarding the weight of the evidence for use of HDCT as 'standard' treatment are given. In none of these tumors is there sufficient evidence from randomized trials to consider HDCT a standard to be offered to all patients with a given stage of disease. The apparent benefit of HDCT seen in phase II trials could well be explained by such phenomena as stage shifts and patient selection. Many randomized trials in ovary and breast cancer are either ongoing or presented only as abstracts so final results must be awaited to quantify the benefit, if any of HDCT. It is acknowledged, however, that some practitioners already utilize this treatment. We speculate about the differences in philosophical approaches to cancer treatment which might contribute to early acceptance of novel therapies in the absence of adequate randomized data.

Drug-induced apoptosis and p53, BCL-2 and BAX expression in breast cancer tissues in vivo and in fibroblast cells in vitro

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapeutic management of breast cancers is a difficult task as they show significant differences in chemosensitivity. The present study was undertaken to determine the usefulness of the apoptosis-related factors as indicators of tumor sensitivity to 5'-deoxyfluorouridine (5'-DFUR) in breast cancers.

METHODS

(1) Forty-six breast cancer patients were randomly assigned to a group in which oral 5'-DFUR (1200 mg/day) was administered for more than 5 days before operation (24 patients) and a control group who received no preoperative chemotherapy (22 patients). Surgical specimens were examined for the frequency of apoptotic cells [apoptotic index (AI)] by a terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate nick end labeling method and for the expression of p53, BCL-2 and BAX by immunohistochemical staining. (2) Normal human diploid fetal lung fibroblast, IMR90 and SV40 transformed IMR90 were exposed to 5-FU. Apoptotic cells were detected by flow cytometry and BCL-2 and BAX mRNAs by real-time quantitative RT-PCR analysis.

RESULTS

(1) No significant difference in the AIs or in BCL-2 and BAX scores was observed between the 5'-DFUR-treated and control groups. However, in the p53 negative subgroup (n = 36), AI and BAX scores were higher and BCL-2 scores lower in the 5'-DFUR group than in the control group (P = 0.006, 0.008 and 0.050, respectively). (2) The sensitivity of IMR90 was significantly decreased by SV40 transformation and the 5-FU-induced cytotoxicity was mainly due to induction of apoptosis. The BCL-2/BAX mRNA ratio was decreased in response to 5-FU in IMR90. These results correlated with our clinical data.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative treatment with 5'-DFUR induced apoptosis and changes in BCL-2 and BAX expression in p53 negative breast cancers. p53 status, AI and the BCL-2/BAX ratio may be useful information for the choice of postoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer.

The role of chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer

Metastatic breast cancer remains a devastating and largely incurable disease. Currently available therapies offer meaningful palliation for many and modest prolongation of survival for some patients. Single-agent hormonal therapy remains the treatment of choice for patients with ER-positive disease, with sequential use of further hormonal agents or cytotoxic chemotherapy at the time of disease progression. Chemotherapy is appropriate as initial therapy for patients with receptor-negative or rapidly progressive visceral disease. Although combination regimens may increase response rates, the lack of survival benefit does not justify the increased toxicity of aggressive combination regimens in most patients. Maintenance chemotherapy deserves consideration in selected well-informed patients, especially those with few therapy-related side effects. High-dose regimens confer substantial toxicity with no clear therapeutic advantage and cannot be recommended outside of ongoing trials. New chemotherapy agents offer the hope of effective salvage therapy with acceptable toxicity to a larger number of patients. Perhaps most promising, the development of targeted, biologically based therapies such as rhuMAbHER2 offers encouragement for the future.

Prospective Randomized Study of Cyclophosphamide, Epirubicin, and 5-Fluorouracil versus Cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin, and 5-Fluorouracil in Advanced or Recurrent Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND: Treatment with cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, and 5-fluorouracil (CAF), a widely used, potent regimen is sometimes restricted by the myelotoxicityand myocardiotoxicity of adriamycin (ADR). In a prospective randomized controlled study of patients with advanced or recurrent breast cancer, the efficacy and toxicity of a CEF regimen, in which epirubicin (EPI) was substituted for ADR, was compared with CAF. METHODS: 138 female patients under 75 years of age who had unresectable or recurrent breast cancer during the period from October, 1989 to September, 1991, were randomized to one of two treatment regimens. The first regimen consisted of cyclophosphamide 100 mg p.o. d1-14, adriamycin 30 mg/m(2) i.v. d1, 8 and 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2) i.v. d1, 8 (CAF). In the second regimen, EPI 30 mg/m(2) i.v. d1, 8was substituted for ADR (CEF). Both regimens were delivered q4 weeks. RESULTS: Of 138 patients, 105 (CEF 56, CAF 49) were evaluable for response and survival, and all were evaluable for toxicity (CEF 68, CAF 70). The median course of lots CEF and CAF was 3 cycles. Response rates (complete response plus partial response) with CEF and CAF were 35.7% (20/56) and 36.7% (18/49), respectively. Adverse effects were similar in the two groups, but severe leukopenia (CEF 36.8%, CAF 64.3%) and hepatic toxicity (CEF 1.5%, CAF 12.9%) were encountered more frequently with CAF than with CEF. The duration of 50% survival was 135.9 weeks for CEF and 172.1 weeks for CAF (not significant). CONCLUSION: At an equal dose of EPI and ADR response rates and survival of the CEF group were similar to those of the CAF group, but adverse effects were fewer in the CEF group.

Results and long term follow-up for 1581 patients with metastatic breast carcinoma treated with standard dose doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy: a reference

BACKGROUND

The authors report results and long term follow-up for 1581 patients with metastatic breast carcinoma treated with doxorubicin-containing combination chemotherapy at a single institution; this report is meant to serve as a reliable reference for single-arm studies of newer therapies in this patient population.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data from 18 successive doxorubicin-containing protocols for the treatment of metastatic breast carcinoma were evaluated.

RESULTS

The response rate was 65.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 62.5-67.3%), complete response (CR) rate was 16.6% (95% CI: 14.8-18.6%), and partial response (PR) rate was 48.5% (95% CI: 46.0-50.9%). Median progression free survival (PFS) was 11.5 months (95% CI: 10.9-12.3 months) and median overall survival (OS) was 21.3 months (95% CI: 20.3-22.7 months). Survival correlated with response to therapy; median PFS and OS were 22.4 and 41.8 months, respectively, for the patients who achieved CR (n=263) and 14 and 24.6 months, respectively, for PR patients (n=766). The median OS of patients who had progressive disease during chemotherapy was 3.8 months. The response rate, PFS and OS correlated with number of organs involved and especially with tumor burden. Patients with hormone receptor-positive tumors had a similar response rate to that of patients with hormone receptor negative tumors but had significantly longer PFS (medians of 14.3 and 8.7 months, respectively) and OS (medians of 28.6 and 18.1 months, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with metastatic breast carcinoma, doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy had a response rate of 65% and a CR rate of 16.6%. PFS and OS were 11.5 months and 21.3 months, respectively, for all responders and 22.4 months and 41.8 months, respectively, for those who had CR.

Myeloprotective Effect of Early Primary Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor during Six Courses of Intensified 5-Fluorouracil, Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide (120FEC) Chemotherapy for Advanced Breast Cancer

Aims and background

The neutropenia induced by six courses of an intensified FEC regimen is expected to be checked by early primary administration of G-CSF which is stopped eight days before the next chemotherapy course. Less information is available about megakaryocytic and erythroid toxicity over six courses.

Methods and study design

Sixty-six consecutive patients with metastatic breast cancer completed six courses of a randomized treatment with two FEC regimens adminstered every 21 days, in which 600 mg/m2 of cyclophosphamide and 5-FU was associated with 60 or 120 mg/m2 of epirubicin (60FEC, 35 patients, vs 120FEC, 31 patients). 120FEC was supported by early primary G-CSF (days 4 to 13). Blood counts were obtained seven times during each course.

Results

The non-hematologic toxicity over 364 courses was similar in 60FEC and 120FEC. No cumulative hematologic toxicity was observed for white blood cells (WBC) and platelets (PLT), while for hemoglobin (Hb) a somewhat higher cumulative toxicity was observed with 120FEC than with 60FEC. WBC, PLT and Hb grade III-IV toxicity occurred in 40.1% and 45.6% (P=ns), in 23.1% and 0.8% (P <.0001) and in 15.6% and 3.0% (P <.005) of the two regimens, respectively. There were no febrile or hemorrhagic episodes. The epirubicin relative dose intensity delivered was 1.95 in 120FEC with respect to 60FEC.

Conclusions

Our G-CSF schedule permitted to deliver six courses of 120FEC without any clinically relevant side effects. Grade III-IV leukopenia was similar with 120FEC and 60FEC, while grade III-IV thrombocytopenia and anemia occurred more often with 120FEC than with 60FEC.

Dose-Intensified Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: Present and Future Prospects

With the trend to maximize chemotherapy in breast cancer, the use of peripheral blood stem cells in addition to hematopoietic growth factors to alleviate myelosuppression caused by dose-intensified chemotherapy has been shown to be beneficial. In treatment of metastatic breast cancer, response rates and complete response rates as high as 100%and nearly 80%, respectively, have been reported. Such treatments have shown even greater promise in an adjuvant setting for high-risk breast cancer. High-dose chemotherapy studies, however, involve highly-selected patient populations who are generally compared with unselected patients, and controversy still surrounds the question of whether it is substantially superior to conventional-dose chemotherapy. There are now more than sufficient data to justify ongoing randomized trials, and the most important overall recommedation is to encourage patients to participate in these clinical trials.

Much ado about not...enough data: high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue for breast cancer

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow or stem cell rescue (HDC/ASCR) has been proposed as a promising treatment strategy for breast cancer. Despite the frequency with which this procedure is performed, the role of HDC/ASCR in the treatment of breast cancer remains undefined. The purpose of this review is to examine the rationale for the procedure, the research progress to date, and the limitations of available data. A literature search of Medline from January 1966 through May 1997, CancerLit from January 1983 through May 1997, and Current Contents through May 1997 identified more than 600 English language papers or abstracts on this topic. Our review focuses on the preclinical and clinical data that explore the concept of chemotherapy dose intensity and the role of dose intensity in treating breast cancer. HDC/ASCR is based on the hypothesis that high-dose chemotherapy will overcome drug resistance, eradicate metastatic disease, and increase the proportion of women with breast cancer who are "cured." To date, results from only one phase 3 trial of HDC/ASCR compared with more conventional therapy have been published. Phase 2 and some phase 3 data on HDC/ASCR in the treatment of high-risk primary breast cancer and metastatic breast cancer are discussed. However, the results are inconclusive. The completion of national and international randomized trials is urgently needed to establish definitively the role of HDC/ASCR in the treatment of breast cancer.

A randomized study of epirubicin monotherapy every four or every two weeks in advanced breast cancer. A Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact on the response rate in patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC) of the doubling of the dose intensity (DI) of epirubicin monotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 1991 until April 1996, 167 patients with ABC were randomized to receive epirubicin (110 mg/m2) either every four (81 patients, group A) or every two weeks (86 patients, group B). Filgrastim (5 micrograms/kg/daily) was administered prophylactically on days 2-12 of each cycle.

RESULTS

The two groups were equally balanced in terms of major patient and tumor characteristics. Even though the median cumulative dose of epirubicin was identical in the two groups (651 mg/m2), the median DI of epirubicin was doubled in group B (27.2 vs. 52.9 mg/m2/wk, respectively). The complete response (CR) rate was significantly increased in group B (5%, 95% CI: 0.16%-9.84% vs. 17%, 95% CI: 8.9%-25.08%, P = 0.011), although overall response rates were similar (49% vs. 53%, P = 0.5957). Also, there was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3-4 toxicity between the two groups. After a median follow-up of 25 months (range, 0.43-43.3+) no significant difference was observed in the duration of response (median, 10 months vs. 8.5 months, P = 0.5130), time to progression (median, 7.2 months vs. 7.4 months, P = 0.2970) or survival (median, 14.6 months vs. 14.9 months, P = 0.4483). Logistic regression analysis showed that performance status was a significant variable for response (P = 0.0068) and multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model revealed that performance status was significant for survival (P = 0.0049), while the presence of multiple metastases (P = 0.0020) was significant for time to progression.

CONCLUSION

Doubling the planned DI of epirubicin monotherapy significantly increases the CR rate but has no influence on time to progression or survival in patients with ABC.

Optimising treatment outcomes: a review of current management strategies in first-line chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer

Metastatic breast cancer remains an essentially incurable disease and chemotherapy, despite producing frequent and clinically useful responses, has had a disappointing impact on survival. Several highly promising lines of clinical research with new agents, combinations and dosages may yet produce an improved outcome. Of the new drugs that have been studied, the taxoids, docetaxel and paclitaxel appear to be the most active agents yet discovered in this setting; navelbine is also active. Investigations of high-dose chemotherapy have produced the highest rates of complete response achieved in patients with this condition. The results of recent randomised trials confirm the high activity of this modality and also suggest a survival advantage compared with more traditionally dosed treatment. Active research into biological therapy is also under way and vaccines, antibodies and inhibitors of growth factors are all being evaluated.

Haematological toxicity: a marker of adjuvant chemotherapy efficacy in stage II and III breast cancer

Two hundred and eleven patients with node-positive stage II and III breast cancer were treated with eight cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy comprising cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and oral ftorafur (CAFt), with and without tamoxifen. All patients had undergone radical surgery, and 148 patients were treated with post-operative radiotherapy in two randomized studies. The impact of haematological toxicity of CAFt on distant disease-free (DDFS) and overall survival (OS) was recorded. Dose intensity of all given cycles (DI), dose intensity of the two initial cycles (DI2) and total dose (TD) were calculated separately for all chemotherapy drugs and were correlated with DDFS and OS. Patients with a lower leucocyte nadir during the chemotherapy had significantly better DDFS and OS (P = 0.01 and 0.04 respectively). Dose intensity of the two first cycles also correlated significantly with DDFS (P = 0.05) in univariate but not in multivariate analysis, while the leucocyte nadir retained its prognostic value. These results indicate that the leucocyte nadir during the adjuvant chemotherapy is a biological marker of chemotherapy efficacy; this presents the possibility of establishing an optimal dose intensity for each patient. The initial dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy also seems to be important in assuring the optimal effect of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Autologous stem cell transplantation in breast cancer

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support is an investigational treatment for patients with breast cancer who have a high risk of recurrence or who have metastatic disease. In the adjuvant setting, there is a lack of survival data from randomized studies comparing high-dose to conventional-dose therapy. High-dose adjuvant chemotherapy was found to result in as high as 71% 5-year event-free survival in patients with more than nine metastatic axillary lymph nodes in one nonrandomized study, which appears to be superior to those achieved with conventional-dose therapy. In metastatic breast cancer the great majority of patients die of cancer despite high-dose therapy with the current regimens, and it is unclear whether survival of these patients is improved with high-dose therapy as compared to conventional-dose therapy. However, a few patients with breast cancer with distant metastases have enjoyed a disease-free interval lasting for several years after high-dose therapy, which is rarely seen with conventional-dose therapy, and one small randomized trial showed improved survival in the high-dose arm of the study. The more extensive patient selection for high-dose chemotherapy needs to be taken into account when comparing the results achieved with different dose levels, and therefore a high priority should be given for randomized studies where high-dose therapy is compared with conventional-dose therapy.

Accelerated chemotherapy with high-dose epirubicin and cyclophosphamide plus r-met-HUG-CSF in locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the toxicity of high-dose epirubicin and cyclophosphamide plus r-met-HUG-CSF (G-CSF) given every 2 weeks and compared the dose-intensity achieved with this schedule with that obtained in a previous study we conducted in which the same regimen was given every 3 weeks without G-SCF (EC 21). The secondary objective was to explore the activity of this regimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between December 1991 and March 1994, 41 patients (pts), 19 with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) and 22 with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), were given high-dose epirubicin (Hd-Epi) (120 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (CTX) (600 mg/m2) on day 1 every 14 days (EC 14) plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (5 mcg/kg/d s.c. on days 2-12). A total of 8 cycles in LABC pts (4 pre- and post-surgery), and 6-8 cycles in MCB pts were administered. The results were compared with those obtained in the previous study.

RESULTS

The incidence of WHO grade 3-4 neutropenia was significantly reduced in the EC 14 + G-CSF regimen (25.2% vs. 46.8% in 214 and 250 evaluable cycles, respectively, p<0.0001), as well as the incidence of neutropenic fever (7% vs. 3%, p=0.05). Grade 3-4 anemia (36.6% vs. 8% pts, p=0.001) and grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (17.1% vs. 0 pts, p=0.002), were significantly more frequent in EC 14 + G-CSF. No significant differences in the other side effects were found. A total of 17 of 207 of the cycles (8.2%) were delayed in the EC 14 + G-CSF vs. 58/271 (21.4%) in the EC 21 (p<0.0001). The main reasons for these treatment delays were neutropenia (1% vs. 15%), anemia (3% vs. 0) and thrombocytopenia (1% vs. 0). As a result of treatment acceleration and differences in dose delays, the patients on EC 14 + G-CSF received a higher dose-intensity (Epi 58.51 mg/m2/wk vs. 36.8 mg/m2/wk; CTX 292.52 mg/m2/wk vs. 182.9 mg/m2/wk). A complete response at surgery was obtained in 9/19 (47.4%) LABC pts. An objective CR was obtained in 11/22 MBC pts (50%) and a partial response in 8/22 (36.4%), yielding an overall response rate of 86.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Hd-Epi + CTX is very active against both LABC and MBC. The administration of G-CSF allows dose intensification of both drugs (a 59.5% increase of the actual dose intensity) with acceptable clinical tolerance (a lower incidence of neutropenia but a higher incidence of anemia and thrombocytopenia). Only a specifically designed phase III trial will lead to definitive conclusions regarding the greater antitumor activity of accelerated CSF-including regimens as compared to standard chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer.

Multiple cycles of high dose chemotherapy supported by hematopoietic progenitor cells as treatment for patients with advanced malignancies

BACKGROUND

Retrospective studies suggest that dose intensity is an important determinant of outcome in the treatment of patients with a variety of malignant diseases such as breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and lymphoma. Unfortunately, these results have not been clearly substantiated in prospective randomized trials. One problem with these studies may be that the degree of dose escalation is not sufficient to result in an improved outcome because the chemotherapy doses are limited by hematopoietic toxicity. In an attempt to deliver more dose-intensive therapy, the feasibility of the administration of multiple cycles of high dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic progenitor cell and growth factor support was investigated in patients with advanced malignancies.

METHODS

Nineteen patients with metastatic breast cancer and six patients with refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were initially treated with etoposide (VP-16) (2 gm/m2) and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). Peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitor cells were collected by leukapheresis and cryopreserved as the patients' leukocyte counts recovered from the nadir induced by VP-16. Patients were then treated with four cycles of mitoxantrone (18 mg/m2), thiotepa (150-200 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (4500-5000 mg/m2) as a 48-72 hour continuous infusion followed by infusion of one-quarter of their progenitor cells 48 hours later. All patients also received G-CSF (5 micrograms/kg/day) until engraftment.

RESULTS

A total of 88 of a planned 100 cycles of therapy were administered to these 25 patients. The median time to recovery of an absolute neutrophil count of 500/microliters or greater was 13-14 days (range, 7-18 days) and time to recovery of a platelet count of 20,000/microliters or greater was 13-14 days (range, 7-16 days) after the initiation of each cycle of chemotherapy. The median number of platelet transfusions required after each cycle was 2-3 (range, 0-18 transfusions) and the number of erythrocyte transfusions was 4 (range, 0-10). The most common toxicity was diarrhea. Prophylactic intravenous antibiotics were administered to avoid fever with neutropenia. Two patients developed interstitial pneumonitis and one patient died. One heavily pretreated patient failed to engraft after the first cycle. Reversible veno-occlusive disease of the liver developed in one patient after the fourth cycle of therapy. Four patients progressed while on therapy. Eight patients were disease free and 13 patients had a partial response or had a positive bone scan as the only evidence of disease at the completion of therapy. Seven patients, two with lymphoma and five with breast cancer (28%), remain progression free with a median follow-up of 24.7 months (range, 17-28 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Support with hematopoietic progenitor cells and growth factors allows the timely administration of repetitive cycles of high dose chemotherapy, resulting in a significant increase in dose intensity with acceptable toxicity.

The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to deliver four cycles of ifosfamide and epirubicin every 14 days in women with advanced or metastatic breast cancer

Twenty patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer were treated with four cycles of ifosfamide/mesna 5 g m-2 and epirubicin 60 mg m-2 every 14 days with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF, Filgrastim). Complete remission occurred in six out of the 20 patients (30%, 95% confidence interval 12-54%) and there were 12 partial responders (60%, 95% confidence interval 37-81%), thus giving an overall response rate of 90% (95% confidence interval 63-97%). Two patients had progressive disease. The median duration of response for those patients with metastatic disease was 7.3 (1.3-20.1+) months. The median survival time for these patients was 15 (5.3-27.9+) months. Of the four patients treated with locally advanced disease three achieved a complete clinical response and one a partial response. Three out of four of these patients subsequently underwent a mastectomy, and in one of these no viable tumour was seen. Our conclusion is that this regimen is excellent palliation for metastatic disease and possibly useful neoadjuvant treatment.

High-dose therapy with autologous bone marrow stem cell support in primary and metastatic human breast cancer. A review

A dose-response relationship has been demonstrated for metastatic human breast cancer. This increased response using moderately increased doses is generally not translated into an improved survival. The use of high-dose therapy to selected patients with metastases/recurrence responding to conventional doses of polychemotherapy may lead to an improved survival tail. Conventional doses of polychemotherapy in the adjuvant setting will reduce the relative mortality by around 25% 10 years after primary diagnosis. The use of high-dose therapy supported by autologous bone marrow stem cells may be markedly more effective in the adjuvant setting, especially to high-risk patients, compared with standard polychemotherapy. Several randomized studies are being planned or have already started in order to answer different aspects of this issue.

High-dose epirubicin and r-met-hu G-CSF (filgrastim) in the treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer: A Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group study

The delivery of high-dose epirubicin in patients with advanced breast cancer usually entails serious myelotoxicity and frequent treatment delays. Concurrent administration of G-CSF probably allows the administration of epirubicin on schedule with minimal morbidity. From August 1990 to February 1992, 42 women with advanced breast cancer were treated with six cycles of epirubicin 110 mg/m2 every 4 weeks. Filgrastim 5 micrograms/kg per day for 14 days was administered subcutaneously starting 24 hours after chemotherapy. All patients had multiple metastatic sites, and 39 had visceral metastases. All cases were evaluable for response, toxicity, and survival. Treatment was delayed in only two cases. The actually administered average dose per unit time per patient amounted to 99.6% of the dose prescribed by the protocol. Two (4.5%; 95% confidence interval [C.I.] 0-16%) patients demonstrated a complete response and 14 (33%; 95% C.I. 19-49%) a partial response. Median time to progression was 31 weeks and median survival was 60 weeks. Severe granulocytopenia was seen in six patients; stomatitis and diarrhea in one patient each. Myoskeletal pain was noticed in 23 (55%) patients, while cardiac problems were reported in 3 cases. The present study shows that the prophylactic use of r-met-hu G-CSF allows the administration of high-dose epirubicin every 4 weeks with minimal morbidity and an improved quality of life.

Patterns of failure of complete responders following high-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation for metastatic breast cancer: implications for the use of adjuvant radiation therapy

PURPOSE

To determine the pattern of failure and outcome of patients achieving a complete response following high-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation for metastatic breast cancer, and to evaluate the use of involved field radiation therapy in this setting.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty-one patients with metastatic breast cancer treated on three successive high-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation trials between January 1987 and March 1992 who achieved a complete response were evaluated. Twenty-three patients (74.2%) had initially Stage I-II disease. Initial therapy consisted of mastectomy in 19 (74.2%), adjuvant chemotherapy in 19 (61.3%), and adjuvant radiation therapy in 11 (35.5%). All patients underwent induction chemotherapy prior to high-dose intensification. High-dose chemotherapy consisted of cytoxan, thiotepa +/- carmustine. Fourteen patients received radiation therapy prior to (7) or following the high-dose chemotherapy (7) with either the intent to palliate a symptomatic disease site (4) or to attain/maintain a complete response (10). The four palliatively treated sites received 30 Gy in 3.0 Gy fractions, the sites treated definitively received a mean dose of 43.9 Gy (range, 18-64.8 Gy) in 1.5-2.0 Gy fractions. Seventy-two disease sites were present in the 31 patients. The most common sites involved were nodal (23), bone (14), and chest wall/breast (11). Nineteen sites were bulky (> 2 cm in size). Twenty-three sites were irradiated (19 definitively, 4 palliatively). Median follow-up was 18 months (range, 2-49 months).

RESULTS

Twenty (64.5%) of the 31 patients relapsed. Eleven of the 17 patients not receiving radiation failed. Seven (63.6%) failed first solely in sites of previous disease involvement and four (36.4%) failed in new sites. This failure pattern was reversed in the patients receiving radiation therapy. Nine of the 14 (64.3%) patients relapsed. Two (22.2%) failed solely in old sites and six (66.7%) solely in new sites. One patient (11.1%) failed simultaneously in both old and new sites. Patients receiving radiation therapy had a similar 2-year actuarial disease-free survival compared to those not treated with radiation (28.3% vs. 32.1%) (p = 0.14). However, patients with less than three sites of disease had a better disease-free survival at 2 years with the addition of radiation therapy (30.0% vs. 17.6%) (p = 0.03). Patients with locoregional disease only had a lower rate of local failure (one out of four vs. three out of five) and a longer mean time to any failure (4.0 months vs. 17.5 months) with the addition of radiation therapy. Of the 72 sites identified, 59 (81.9%) were amenable to radiation therapy either prior to or following the transplant. The use of radiation therapy resulted in a borderline significant improvement in 2-year actuarial control of all sites (82.4% vs. 64.3%) (p = 0.09) as well as of bulky sites (80.0% vs. 51.4%) (p = 0.08). Excluding the four sites treated with palliative intent only, the 2-year actuarial local control of the irradiated sites was 92.8%. None of the 14 treated patients experienced untoward sequelae.

CONCLUSION

The predominant site of initial failure in patients with metastatic breast cancer achieving a complete response following high-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation is in sites of previous disease involvement. Radiation therapy given in conjunction with the high-dose chemotherapy is capable of improving the control of these sites, the majority of which are amenable to treatment with radiation therapy. Our data suggests that patients with less than three sites of disease, bulky disease, and locoregional disease only should be considered for radiation therapy in addition to high-dose chemotherapy.

Dose intensity and high dose therapy. Two different concepts

"Dose response" refers to a direct relationship between the amount of chemotherapy administered and observed degree of antitumor effect. What is often implied by the term is the administration of pulsed, high dose therapy, resulting in very high peak concentrations. Clinically, this has been translated as multiple alkylating agent-based regimens requiring intensive supportive care and associated with substantial morbidity and an appreciable mortality risk. Such regimens typically are given as consolidation after an initial period of standard outpatient therapy and may require autologous hematopoietic stem cell support. "Dose intensity" is defined as the amount of drug administered per unit of time, typically reported in mg/m2/week. This is a more precise term than "dose response." A dose-intensive regimen may or may not be one associated with high peak concentrations. For example, prolonged or continuous administration of an agent like cyclophosphamide may be quite dose-intensive, but will be associated with lower peak concentrations and less acute toxicity than a similarly dose-intensive, pulsed high dose regimen of the same drug. Retrospective analyses and prospective, randomized trials suggest the importance of dose intensity in the treatment of breast cancer. The evidence that high dose therapy (associated with high peak plasma levels) is beneficial in breast cancer rests on a number of Phase II trials. In the setting of poor prognosis Stage IV disease, these trials suggest little improvement in median survival, but better long term survival (at or beyond 2 years) in 15-25% of such patients. This benefiting cohort appears to be in unmaintained disease free remission, whereas standard therapy in the past has almost never produced such remissions in the poor prognosis subgroup of Stage IV disease. In the setting of high risk Stage II disease, Phase II trials of similar high dose therapy indicate a higher proportion of patients who are free of recurrence at 2-3 years than expected from available historic controls. Randomized trials are now underway in Stage IV poor prognosis patients and in Stage II high risk patients to see whether the apparent improvements in outcome associated with pulsed high dose chemotherapy can be validated prospectively. The regimens under study in these randomized trials include agents that require autologous support with harvested bone marrow and/or peripheral blood progenitor cells. Such obligate stem cell support carries with it the risk of tumor cell contamination in the collection and subsequent iatrogenic dissemination of disease.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

High-dose, brief duration, multiagent chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The authors evaluated a high-intensity inpatient regimen using augmented but subtransplantation doses of multiple agents in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Two high-dose courses were given in an attempt to improve the efficacy of high-dose regimens using a single course.

METHODS

Forty women received treatment between October 1988 and October 1991. The median age was 38 years (range, 24-56 years). Twenty-five patients were receiving their first chemotherapy for metastatic disease; 15 patients had received one or more prior regimens. The patients received two courses of chemotherapy, which consisted of the following: cyclophosphamide 1500 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) on days 1 and 2; doxorubicin 45 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1 and 2; cisplatin 20 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, and 10; 5-fluorouracil 1000 mg/m2 on days 8, 9, and 10 (continuous infusion); methotrexate 100 mg/m2 i.v. on days 15 and 22; leucovorin 15 mg/m2 i.v. or by mouth for four doses beginning 24 hours after methotrexate. Etoposide 400 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1, 2, and 3 was substituted for doxorubicin in 14 patients who had received prior doxorubicin.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine of 40 patients (73%) had objective response to therapy, with 10 (25%) complete responses. Four patients who obtained a complete response remain disease-free at 14, 21, 28, and 32 months, respectively; all of these patients received this regimen as first-line therapy for metastatic disease. Myelosuppression was severe, with median durations of leukocytes less than 1000/microliters and platelets less than 50,000/microliters of 15 days (range, 7-48 days) and 13 days (range, 3-49 days), respectively. Moderate or severe mucositis occurred in 56 of 68 courses. Four patients (10%) had treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

This regimen produced high overall response and complete response rates compared with standard regimens. However, only 15% of patients who received this therapy as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer remain disease-free, and median response duration was shorter than that reported using high-dose therapy with bone marrow support. Toxicity with this regimen was greater than anticipated, although myelosuppression and stomatitis would be reduced by the use of cytokines. This regimen does not improve results achieved with standard therapy sufficiently to justify its toxicity and expense.