An evaluation of outpatient bone marrow harvesting

Bone Marrow Harvesting of Allogeneic Donors in an Outpatient Setting: A Single-Center Experience

The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the safety and efficacy of bone marrow (BM) harvesting of allogeneic donors in an outpatient setting. Data of 226 related and unrelated donors who underwent BM harvest under general anesthesia at our institution from 2002 to 2014 were analyzed. Sixteen patients were a priori planned for admission for social reasons and 210 patients underwent BM harvesting with the intention to perform this procedure on an outpatient basis. To identify factors that predispose for hospital admission, we retrospectively analyzed donor characteristics and collection parameters. Outpatient treatment was performed in 178 of 210 donors (85%), whereas 32 donors (15%) required admission for clinical reasons (mainly clinically relevant anemia and circulatory problems). These individuals were not significantly different in sex distribution, age, donor's body weight, and the proportion of related donors from those who were not admitted. However, we found a significantly higher collection volume per kilogram donor's body weight in inpatients compared with volume for outpatients (16 versus 13 mL/kg body weight, P < .001). Severe adverse events or deaths occurred neither in the inpatient nor in the outpatient setting. Our study demonstrated that BM harvest in an outpatient setting is safe and feasible for the majority of allogeneic donors. A high volume of BM represented a major risk factor for inpatient admission.

Performing bone marrow harvest on an outpatient basis: a single center UK experience

Bone marrow harvest (BMH) has historically been performed on an inpatient basis with a minimum of overnight inpatient stays. We commenced a program of outpatient (day case) BMH in 1999, performing 54 day case BMHs over a 3-year period. Of the total of 54 cases, 51 were known patients with hematological malignancies and 3 were healthy normal donors. Seven were excluded from day case BMH. Five (10.6%) of 47 patients/donors who were accepted for day case BMH required overnight admission. Two developed hypotension requiring intravenous fluid resuscitation. Two had excessive vomiting and 1 a difficult and prolonged harvest and was admitted at the request of the anesthetist. None of the patients admitted required more than overnight admission and 42 (89.4%) were discharged the same evening. In conclusion, day case BMH is safe, cost-effective, and reduces the pressure on inpatient beds.

Experiences of donors enrolled in a randomized study of allogeneic bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

The experiences of 69 (38 marrow and 31 peripheral blood stem cell [PBSC]) donors participating in a randomized trial comparing allogeneic bone marrow with PBSC transplantation were studied. Marrow was collected by means of standard harvest techniques and general or regional anesthesia. PBSC donors were treated with 5 to 7 days of filgrastim at a dose of 16 microg/kg/d and underwent 1 to 3 days of apheresis to obtain 5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells per kilogram recipient weight. Donors completed questionnaires describing their health experiences before, during, and then weekly after donation until return to baseline status. Both marrow and PBSC donors reported minimal fluctuation in symptoms measuring emotional status. In contrast, both groups of donors reported deterioration in physical status starting with administration of filgrastim (PBSC donors) or after the marrow collection procedure. The symptom burden reported was similar, with pain a prominent symptom for both groups. Equivalent mean levels of maximal pain, average pain, and pain duration through the day were reported, although toxicity peaks occurred at different time points during the harvest procedures. All PBSC donors but only 79% of marrow donors reported good physical status by 14 days after the harvest procedures. These data demonstrate similar levels of physical discomfort for hematopoietic stem cell donors regardless of the collection procedure used, but a quicker resolution of symptoms for PBSC donors.

Mobilization, collection, and processing of autologous peripheral blood stem cells: development of a clinical process with associated costs

We surveyed five academic medical centers to develop a clinical process for patients undergoing cytokine mobilization and leukapheresis prior to autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Costs were obtained from three centers and applied to each component of the pathway. Costs were divided into three categories: (1) pre-apheresis evaluation; (2) process of apheresis; (3) post-apheresis and peripheral blood stem cells processing. All centers participated in the development of the leukapheresis pathway. Because charges vary greatly among institutions, costs were determined from three of the institutions and a mean was calculated for each of the components of the process. Pre-apheresis costs consisted of central line placement, blood work, and the price of cytokine (rhG-CSF). Costs associated with apheresis included professional fees (for physicians and nurses), leukapheresis with stem cell cryopreservation, storage, sterility testing, analysis of circulating CD34+ cell counts, and 1 day of cytokine therapy. The post-apheresis process included thawing with sterility testing along with CD34+ cell number analysis and the performance of clonogenic assays. Total costs were as follows: (1) pre-apheresis, $2711; (2) apheresis, $2990; and, (3) post-apheresis/stem cell processing, $754. This survey from five academic medical centers provides the average costs associated with three main components of the apheresis procedure. Because many patients require multiple aphereses, interventions to achieve target CD34+ cell collections in as few collections as possible would result in significant cost reduction.

The true cost of bone marrow transplantation

Bone marrow transplantation is an example of a highly technical therapy that offers hope to patients with bone marrow failure or various malignancies. Bone marrow transplantation is much more costly "up-front" but perhaps not more costly long-term than alternative therapies. Although economic analyses appear relatively simple, interpretation and use can be problematic. Several economic analyses have identified complications that occur frequently and affect the reported cost-effectiveness of high-dose chemotherapy. Efforts to reduce the cost of bone marrow transplantation have focused on new strategies to more effectively control these complications. The introduction of new technologies to speed engraftment, to improve patient selection methods, and the shifting of care to outpatient settings all have resulted in significant reductions in duration of hospital stay, treatment-related mortality, and costs. More studies of long-term outcomes are needed for transplant and nontransplant treatment options to guide present and future applications of this treatment option.

[Organization of bone marrow transplantation and the nurses' performance]

This is a bibliographic study on bone marrow transplantation emphasizing nurses actions, reviewed from publishings of the last ten years. The organization of informations allowed authors to identify that for performing a transplant it would be necessary to have an adequate infrastructure, specialized human resources and operational resources for the assistance to be feasible. It was determined that nurses actions in this procedure are required in all stages of care, differently in each phase, and preferentially individualized and integral in a maximum ratio of one nurse for two patients.

Intensive therapy and autotransplant for patients with an incomplete response to front-line therapy for lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Patients with Hodgkin's disease (HD) and intermediate or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) who fail to achieve a complete remission (CR) with standard induction therapy have a poor prognosis with conventional-dose salvage therapy alone. We examined the role of subsequent intensive therapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) in patients who demonstrated a response to conventional-dose therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-six patients with either HD (n = 30) or NHL (n = 36) underwent intensive therapy with etoposide (60 mg/kg), intravenous melphalan (160-180 mg/m2) followed by infusion of unpurged autologous bone marrow and/or blood cells. All patients had advanced stage or bulky disease at diagnosis and failed to achieve a CR after an anthracycline-containing front-line chemotherapy regimen (NHL) or ABVD or equivalent regimen (HD). Patients who achieved a CR after involved-field radiotherapy were excluded. All patients demonstrated sensitivity to conventional-dose salvage treatment before advancing to intensive therapy and ABMT.

RESULTS

The CR, partial response (PR) and overall response rate (RR) following ABMT for HD patients was 48%, 17% and 65%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 35 months, the predicted three-year overall survival (OS) is 51% (95% CI: 44%-60%) and event-free survival (EFS) is 34% (95% CI: 26%-54%). For patients with NHL, the CR, PR and RR were 68%, 9% and 77%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 28 months, the predicted three-year OS is 51% (95% CI: 35%-66%) and EFS is 39% (95% CI: 21%-57%).

CONCLUSIONS

Intensive therapy with etoposide and melphalan followed by ABMT results in prolonged survival in selected patients with lymphoma who fail to achieve a complete remission to front-line chemotherapy. Based on our previous studies of outcome to conventional-dose salvage chemotherapy, we estimate that of all patients failing induction therapy, 28% with HD and 15% with NHL will be event-free at three years after ABMT.

Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Harvesting

A number of malignant diseases are responsive to supralethal myelotoxic high-dose chemoradiotherapy, and can be treated with hematopoietic stem cell rescue. The number of genetic diseases correctable by replacement of defective pluripotent stem cells with normal stem cells or through gene transfer is ever-increasing. In all these cases, pluripotent hematopoietic stem cells need to be infused, which can be obtained directly from the bone marrow or from the peripheral blood with or without the aid of mobilizing strategies. This article is a detailed review of the technical and medical aspects of stem cell collection from the bone marrow and the peripheral blood.