Initial clinical study of indium-111-labeled clone 110 anticarcinoembryonic antigen antibody in patients with colorectal cancer

How Non-invasive in vivo Cell Tracking Supports the Development and Translation of Cancer Immunotherapies

Immunotherapy is a relatively new treatment regimen for cancer, and it is based on the modulation of the immune system to battle cancer. Immunotherapies can be classified as either molecular or cell-based immunotherapies, and both types have demonstrated promising results in a growing number of cancers. Indeed, several immunotherapies representing both classes are already approved for clinical use in oncology. While spectacular treatment successes have been reported, particularly for so-called immune checkpoint inhibitors and certain cell-based immunotherapies, they have also been accompanied by a variety of severe, sometimes life-threatening side effects. Furthermore, not all patients respond to immunotherapy. Hence, there is the need for more research to render these promising therapeutics more efficacious, more widely applicable, and safer to use. Whole-body in vivo imaging technologies that can interrogate cancers and/or immunotherapies are highly beneficial tools for immunotherapy development and translation to the clinic. In this review, we explain how in vivo imaging can aid the development of molecular and cell-based anti-cancer immunotherapies. We describe the principles of imaging host T-cells and adoptively transferred therapeutic T-cells as well as the value of traceable cancer cell models in immunotherapy development. Our emphasis is on in vivo cell tracking methodology, including important aspects and caveats specific to immunotherapies. We discuss a variety of associated experimental design aspects including parameters such as cell type, observation times/intervals, and detection sensitivity. The focus is on non-invasive 3D cell tracking on the whole-body level including aspects relevant for both preclinical experimentation and clinical translatability of the underlying methodologies.

Cousins at work: How combining medical with optical imaging enhances in vivo cell tracking

Microscopy and medical imaging are related in their exploitation of electromagnetic waves, but were developed to satisfy differing needs, namely to observe small objects or to look inside subjects/objects, respectively. Together, these techniques can help elucidate complex biological processes and better understand health and disease. A current major challenge is to delineate mechanisms governing cell migration and tissue invasion in organismal development, the immune system and in human diseases such as cancer where the spatiotemporal tracking of small cell numbers in live animal models is extremely challenging. Multi-modal multi-scale in vivo cell tracking integrates medical and optical imaging. Fuelled by basic research in cancer biology and cell-based therapeutics, it has been enabled by technological advances providing enhanced resolution, sensitivity and multiplexing capabilities. Here, we review which imaging modalities have been successfully used for in vivo cell tracking and how this challenging task has benefitted from combining macroscopic with microscopic techniques.

Radionuclide-Based Cancer Imaging Targeting the Carcinoembryonic Antigen

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), highly expressed in many cancer types, is an important target for cancer diagnosis and therapy. Radionuclide-based imaging techniques (gamma camera, single photon emission computed tomography [SPECT] and positron emission tomography [PET]) have been extensively explored for CEA-targeted cancer imaging both preclinically and clinically. Briefly, these studies can be divided into three major categories: antibody-based, antibody fragment-based and pretargeted imaging. Radiolabeled anti-CEA antibodies, reported the earliest among the three categories, typically gave suboptimal tumor contrast due to the prolonged circulation life time of intact antibodies. Subsequently, a number of engineered anti-CEA antibody fragments (e.g. Fab’, scFv, minibody, diabody and scFv-Fc) have been labeled with a variety of radioisotopes for CEA imaging, many of which have entered clinical investigation. CEA-Scan (a ^99mTc-labeled anti-CEA Fab’ fragment) has already been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for cancer imaging. Meanwhile, pretargeting strategies have also been developed for CEA imaging which can give much better tumor contrast than the other two methods, if the system is designed properly. In this review article, we will summarize the current state-of-the-art of radionuclide-based cancer imaging targeting CEA. Generally, isotopes with short half-lives (e.g. ¹⁸F and ^99mTc) are more suitable for labeling small engineered antibody fragments while the isotopes with longer half-lives (e.g. ¹²³I and ¹¹¹In) are needed for antibody labeling to match its relatively long circulation half-life. With further improvement in tumor targeting efficacy and radiolabeling strategies, novel CEA-targeted agents may play an important role in cancer patient management, paving the way to “personalized medicine”.

Identification of colon tumour-associated antigens by phage antibody selections on primary colorectal carcinoma

Immunotargeting of solid tumours using antibodies has become a valuable tool for the detection of cancer metastases and the treatment of minimal residual disease. However, only few tumour antigens useful for targeting have been described to date. To identify cell-surface targets on colorectal carcinoma (CRC), we selected a large, human phage antibody repertoire on freshly isolated colon tumour cells. Two antibodies were identified that reacted with epithelial cell-restricted cell-surface antigens, whereas one clone preferentially reacted with stromal cells. These antigens are tumour-associated antigens, as shown by their uniform expression in tumours of different patients and of different differentiation stages and by their limited expression on normal tissues. The pattern of reactivity in immunohistochemistry (IHC) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) suggests that these antigens are different from previously identified tumour-associated antigens (e.g. Ep-CAM or c-ERB-2). This phage antibody-based method may lead to the cloning of novel tumour antigens that are useful for the immunotargeting of solid tumours.

Immunoscintigraphy with a new indium-111-labeled monoclonal antibody (MAb 1A3) in patients with colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

This study was designed to evaluate a new anticolorectal carcinoma monoclonal antibody (1A3), conjugated with the bifunctional chelating agent N,N'-bis(2-hydroxybenzyl)1(4-bromoacetamidobenzyl)1,2-ethylenediam ine-N,N'- diacetic acid and labeled with indium-111, in a Phase I/II study involving 38 patients with localized or advanced colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Patients were injected with indium-111-N,N'-bis(2-hydroxybenzyl) 1(4-bromoacetamidobenzyl)1,2-ethylenediamine-N,N'-diacetic acid-monoclonal antibody 1A3 (1-50 mg, 1-5 mCi) and imaged at two or three sessions one to five days later. Scintigraphic findings were compared with radiologic, pathologic, surgical, and other clinical findings to assess the accuracy of radioimmunoscintigraphy.

RESULTS

At least one known tumor site was clearly defined by planar scintigraphy in 29 (76 percent) patients. Increased radioactivity was seen in 40 of 63 known tumor sites (37/43 abdominal-pelvic, 3/15 hepatic, and 0/5 pulmonary sites) without any apparent dose-related effects. Nineteen previously undetected sites were considered positive by imaging, and, of these, six were biopsy-proven tumor sites, four were probable tumor sites, three were definitely false positive sites, and six were probable false positive sites. Radioimmunoscintigraphy detected proven tumor in 15 of 16 patients with negative or equivocal computed tomography results. Of of the 28 patients with rectosigmoid cancer, 25 (89 percent) had positive studies with 34 of 47 tumor sites showing definite uptake on the scintigrams. This included 3 of 9 hepatic metastases. The only adverse reaction occurred in one patient who developed transient hives. Human anti-mouse antibody responses occurred in approximately one-half of the patients injected with doses of 10 or 50 mg.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that radioimmunoscintigraphy with this indium-111-labeled monoclonal antibody is safe, it can detect most nonhepatic abdominal-pelvic tumors with a positive predictive value of 83 (44/53) percent, and it should prove to be useful, particularly in the diagnosis of recurrent rectal carcinoma.

Current status of radioimmunodetection

Radioimmunodetection is a nuclear medicine technique that depends on in vivo detection of localization of antibodies and antibody forms carrying radioactivity for the purpose of diagnosis in patients with cancer. Current methods take advantage of tracers suitable for high resolution gamma-camera imaging, such as 99mTc and 111In, for common tumors, such as colon and lung cancers. In addition, tracers such as 125I have been used for the intraoperative detection of metastatic deposits. These methods detect from 75 to 90% of metastatic deposits with high specificity, and typically contribute important diagnostic information, even in 25-40% of patients with occult disease.

Clinical comparison of radiolocalization of two monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against the TAG-72 antigen

Ten patients with colorectal cancer metastases received 125I-B72.3 and 131I-CC49 prior to laparotomy (five patients received 1 mg, and five 20 mg of each mAb). Tumor:serum ratios of 131I-CC49 were better than those of 125I-B72.3 (P < 0.01 at 1 mg; P = 0.05 at 20 mg; P < 0.01 at both doses). All known lesions > or = 1 cm in diameter were visualized at the 20 mg dose. There was no difference in absolute tumor uptake of 125I-B72.3 or 131I-CC49. We conclude that mAb CC49 has better relative uptake in colorectal cancers than mAb B72.3.

Immunoscintigraphy in primary colorectal cancer

Immunoscintigraphy is an experimental diagnostic nuclear medicine imaging technique that targets tumor sites with radiolabeled antibodies reactive with tumor-associated antigens. Primary tumors, regional lymph node metastases, and distant metastases have been imaged in patients with colorectal cancer, and United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of a commercial preparation of radiolabeled murine monoclonal antibodies for diagnostic use in such patients is expected soon. Immunoscintigraphy is complementary to computed tomography (CT) scanning in the evaluation of the abdomen and pelvis in patients with colorectal cancer, and it has the additional capability of serial whole body imaging for detection of distant metastases. However, the clinical utility of immunoscintigraphy is being investigated, and its precise diagnostic role in patients with primary colorectal cancer has not been adequately defined. The management of selected patients at increased risk of regional or distant spread of tumor likely would benefit from detection of occult disease and a change in clinical staging, but the routine use of immunoscintigraphy in the preoperative evaluation of patients with primary colorectal cancer is more problematic. More studies are required to determine whether it should be used to stage all patients before operation or merely be reserved for selected patients at increased risk for metastatic disease.

Pitfalls in antibody imaging in colorectal cancer

Monoclonal antibodies against tumor-associated antigens can be conjugated to radionuclides and used to localize tumors in vivo. This technique may be useful in identifying recurrent disease that cannot be demonstrated using conventional studies such as computerized tomography. The literature suggests that the use of antibody fragments and SPECT imaging will increase the diagnostic yield. The choice of radionuclide may vary depending on the region of interest. Factors that influence the success of imaging include the experience of individuals interpreting the scan and the level of tissue antigen expression. Antibodies of murine origin may produce a human antimouse antibody response after imaging, causing allergic responses, interference with subsequent imaging or results of standard in vitro laboratory tests. Finally, false-positive images occur in more than 10% of patients. Current studies in patients with colorectal cancer should focus on determining if changes in management resulting from antibody imaging have a positive effect on either patient survival or quality of life.

Clinical evaluation of tumor targeting with a high-affinity, anticarcinoembryonic-antigen-specific, murine monoclonal antibody, MN-14

BACKGROUND

The authors previously reported that an anticarcinoembryonic antigen antibody against a carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)-specific epitope is preferred for clinical investigations. They developed a second generation, CEA-specific murine monoclonal antibody (MoAb), MN-14 (IMMU-14), that has a tenfold higher affinity. This report summarizes the initial clinical experience with the new MoAb.

METHODS

MN-14 immunoglobulin G (IgG) (0.5-6.0 mg) was labeled with radioactive iodine (I131) (5-80 mCi) and injected into 22 patients with cancer. External scintigraphy was used to determine targeting in patients with low and highly elevated plasma CEA. Quantitative external scintigraphy methods were used to determine organ and tumor clearance rates and absorbed radiation doses. Targeting data were correlated with several factors, including MoAb protein dose, plasma CEA, and relative tumor burden.

RESULTS

Despite more than 80% complexation with plasma CEA of more than 500 ng/ml, all known tumor sites were disclosed by external scintigraphy. The overall sensitivity of tumor targeting on a lesion basis was 89%. The residence time in the blood was predicted by body weight (P = 0.05) and the log of plasma CEA (P = 0.043). The absorbed dose to the red marrow and total body could be predicted by the body weight of the patient, but no other factor contributed significantly to the clearance rate or absorbed dose to the organs. Individual tumors received an average dose of 9.3 +/- 6.4 cGy/mCi. The absorbed dose to the tumors was negatively correlated to the weight of the tumor, and the percent uptake in the tumor was positively correlated to the estimated total tumor burden. Patients injected with approximately 5 mg of MN-14 IgG were more likely to have anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA) develop than were patients who were injected with less MoAb.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that MN-14 targets tumors effectively, even in the presence of elevated circulating CEA. Additional studies are necessary to determine if an advantage for the higher affinity MN-14 MoAb, compared with the lower affinity NP-4 MoAb, can be appreciated clinically.

Specific adhesion of carcinoembryonic antigen-bearing colorectal cancer cells to immobilized carcinoembryonic antigen

Recent characterization of the genomic structure of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is consistent with that of a cellular adhesion molecule. To examine this function in colorectal cancer, the adherence of cell lines to microtiter wells coated with CEA and well-described adhesive molecules was determined. The CEA-positive cell line LoVo and the CEA-devoid cell line H-Meso-1 did not differ in adherence to the extracellular matrix proteins laminin, collagen and fibronectin, whereas LoVo cells adhered to CEA (10 micrograms/well) in a specific manner (43% bound cells vs. 1.5% bound cells with BSA or alpha-acidglycoprotein controls, P less than 0.01) while H-MESO-1 showed no adhesion to CEA (less than 0.6% bound cells). This adhesion of LoVo cells to CEA was not affected by co-incubation of cells with EDTA, sodium azide, or at 23 degrees C. However, the CEA to CEA adhesive interaction was inhibited by a monoclonal antibody directed against an epitope in the N-terminal domain of the CEA molecule, and decreased by enzymatic removal of CEA from the LoVo cell membrane. The extent of adhesion to immobilized CEA by four CEA-producing cell lines (LoVo, HT29, LS174T and LS174-S), correlated with membrane CEA expression as determined by FACS analysis. The results of these experiments add support to the concept that CEA may function as a specific homotypic cellular adhesion molecule for colorectal cancer cells.

Detection of hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma using indium-111 (111In) labeled monoclonal antibody (mAb): MSKCC experience with mAb 111In-C110

Sixteen patients with colorectal carcinoma and a rising serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level and no evidence of extra-abdominal disease were administered 5 mg of an anti-CEA monoclonal antibody (mAb), C110, labeled with approx. 5 mCi of 111In. All patients subsequently underwent exploratory laparotomy, and samples of tumor and normal tissue were obtained. Hepatic lesions (confirmed by histopathology) were visualized as areas of increased radiotracer uptake in 13 of 16 patients. Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) considerably aided detection, being positive in two patients with normal planar images. Ten of the 16 patients had positive x-ray computed tomographic (CT) images. The radioimmunodiagnostic study was falsely negative in 3 of 16 patients with subsequently proven hepatic disease, in one of whom CT was also normal. The antibody study was positive in 80% of lesions, thus being, in this small series, significantly more sensitive (P less than 0.01) than CT. 111In-C110 is a promising monoclonal antibody for the detection of hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma; this is the first study to show consistently greater concentration of 111In-labeled antibody in hepatic lesions than in surrounding normal hepatic parenchyma.