Vinblastine fails to improve response of renal cancer to interferon alfa-n1: high response rate in patients with pulmonary metastases

Renal Cancer Treatment: A Review of the Literature

Renal carcinoma represents about 3% of all adult tumors, with an estimate of 31,900 new cases diagnosed in 2003 in the United States. In the early phase of its natural history, renal cancer is potentially curable by surgery, but if the disease presents any signs of metastasis, the chances of survival are remote, even though anecdotal cases characterized by long survival have been reported. In fact, the treatment of metastatic renal cancer remains unsatisfactory. Systemic treatment with single agents and with polychemotherapy, with or without cytokine-based immunotherapy, has not been successful, obtaining very low response rates without a significant benefit in overall survival. This review highlights the most interesting issues regarding conventional therapeutic strategies, in localized and in advanced disease. New approaches such as monoclonal antibodies, vaccines, gene therapy, angiogenesis inhibitors and allogeneic cell transplantation and their possible clinical applications are also discussed.

Immunotherapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Since the mid-2000s, the field of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has experienced a paradigm shift from non-specific therapy with broad-acting cytokines to specific regimens, which directly target the cancer, the tumour microenvironment, or both.Current guidelines recommend targeted therapies with agents such as sunitinib, pazopanib or temsirolimus (for people with poor prognosis) as the standard of care for first-line treatment of people with mRCC and mention non-specific cytokines as an alternative option for selected patients.In November 2015, nivolumab, a checkpoint inhibitor directed against programmed death-1 (PD-1), was approved as the first specific immunotherapeutic agent as second-line therapy in previously treated mRCC patients.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of immunotherapies either alone or in combination with standard targeted therapies for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma and their efficacy to maximize patient benefit.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), ISI Web of Science and registers of ongoing clinical trials in November 2016 without language restrictions. We scanned reference lists and contacted experts in the field to obtain further information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs with or without blinding involving people with mRCC.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We collected and analyzed studies according to the published protocol. Summary statistics for the primary endpoints were risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MD) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We rated the quality of evidence using GRADE methodology and summarized the quality and magnitude of relative and absolute effects for each primary outcome in our 'Summary of findings' tables.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified eight studies with 4732 eligible participants and an additional 13 ongoing studies. We categorized studies into comparisons, all against standard therapy accordingly as first-line (five comparisons) or second-line therapy (one comparison) for mRCC.Interferon (IFN)-α monotherapy probably increases one-year overall mortality compared to standard targeted therapies with temsirolimus or sunitinib (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.51; 2 studies; 1166 participants; moderate-quality evidence), may lead to similar quality of life (QoL) (e.g. MD -5.58 points, 95% CI -7.25 to -3.91 for Functional Assessment of Cancer - General (FACT-G); 1 study; 730 participants; low-quality evidence) and may slightly increase the incidence of adverse events (AEs) grade 3 or greater (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.32; 1 study; 408 participants; low-quality evidence).There is probably no difference between IFN-α plus temsirolimus and temsirolimus alone for one-year overall mortality (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.34; 1 study; 419 participants; moderate-quality evidence), but the incidence of AEs of 3 or greater may be increased (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.45; 1 study; 416 participants; low-quality evidence). There was no information on QoL.IFN-α alone may slightly increase one-year overall mortality compared to IFN-α plus bevacizumab (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.36; 2 studies; 1381 participants; low-quality evidence). This effect is probably accompanied by a lower incidence of AEs of grade 3 or greater (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.84; 2 studies; 1350 participants; moderate-quality evidence). QoL could not be evaluated due to insufficient data.Treatment with IFN-α plus bevacizumab or standard targeted therapy (sunitinib) may lead to similar one-year overall mortality (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.13 to 1.08; 1 study; 83 participants; low-quality evidence) and AEs of grade 3 or greater (RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.62; 1 study; 82 participants; low-quality evidence). QoL could not be evaluated due to insufficient data.Treatment with vaccines (e.g. MVA-5T4 or IMA901) or standard therapy may lead to similar one-year overall mortality (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.32; low-quality evidence) and AEs of grade 3 or greater (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.39; 2 studies; 1065 participants; low-quality evidence). QoL could not be evaluated due to insufficient data.In previously treated patients, targeted immunotherapy (nivolumab) probably reduces one-year overall mortality compared to standard targeted therapy with everolimus (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.87; 1 study; 821 participants; moderate-quality evidence), probably improves QoL (e.g. RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.78 for clinically relevant improvement of the FACT-Kidney Symptom Index Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS); 1 study, 704 participants; moderate-quality evidence) and probably reduces the incidence of AEs grade 3 or greater (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.65; 1 study; 803 participants; moderate-quality evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Evidence of moderate quality demonstrates that IFN-α monotherapy increases mortality compared to standard targeted therapies alone, whereas there is no difference if IFN is combined with standard targeted therapies. Evidence of low quality demonstrates that QoL is worse with IFN alone and that severe AEs are increased with IFN alone or in combination. There is low-quality evidence that IFN-α alone increases mortality but moderate-quality evidence on decreased AEs compared to IFN-α plus bevacizumab. Low-quality evidence shows no difference for IFN-α plus bevacizumab compared to sunitinib with respect to mortality and severe AEs. Low-quality evidence demonstrates no difference of vaccine treatment compared to standard targeted therapies in mortality and AEs, whereas there is moderate-quality evidence that targeted immunotherapies reduce mortality and AEs and improve QoL.

Perioperative Considerations in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma are complex, with the potential for significant complications, and require extensive pre-, peri-, and postoperative management. This article discusses, in depth, the necessary considerations in the treatment of these patients.

WITHDRAWN: Immunotherapy for advanced renal cell cancer

This review is being updated and replaced following the publication of a new protocol (Unverzagt S, Moldenhauer I, Coppin C, Greco F, Seliger B. Immunotherapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma [Protocol]. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD011673. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011673). It will remain withdrawn when the new review is published.

The editorial group responsible for this previously published document have withdrawn it from publication.

Cytotoxic chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma in the era of targeted therapy

BACKGROUND

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a heterogeneous disease with regards to histology, progression, and response to treatment. Cytotoxic chemotherapy has been extensively studied in metastatic RCC (mRCC). Responses in most studies are modest and the mechanisms of resistance remain poorly understood. Targeted therapies have significantly improved outcomes in mRCC; however, most patients eventually relapse and die of their disease. Early clinical data suggest that combinations of chemotherapy and targeted agents are clinically active and are well tolerated.

METHODS

We reviewed the available literature for published clinical trials incorporating traditional chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of mRCC. These papers were identified through a Medline search and were included if they employed at least one chemotherapeutic agent in the treatment of mRCC. The literature was also reviewed for information regarding mechanisms of chemotherapy resistance.

RESULTS

The data regarding the use of cytotoxic chemotherapy in mRCC consist of small, non-randomized phase I and II studies. The major response proportions with single agent chemotherapies are low but combination regimens either with other cytotoxic agents, cytokines, or targeted agents have demonstrated moderate activity. Disparate trial designs and lack of head to head clinical trials make it difficult to compare the efficacy of chemotherapy with that of immunotherapy or targeted agents. Chemotherapy is particularly useful in patients with collecting duct histology and predominantly sarcomatoid differentiation. Chemotherapy resistance may be mediated by overexpression of p-glycoprotein efflux pumps and the dysregulation of the microtubule-hypoxia inducible factor signaling axis.

CONCLUSIONS

The role of cytotoxic chemotherapy in the treatment for clear cell RCC remains poorly defined. Cytotoxic chemotherapy is considered a standard of care in patients with mRCC with predominantly sarcomatoid differentiation and collecting duct RCC variants (Motzer et al., 2014). Early trials combining chemotherapy with targeted therapies are generally well tolerated and show clinical activity. A better understanding of the biology of aggressive subsets of RCC and mechanisms of resistance will help elucidate the role of cytotoxic agents in the current treatment paradigm of RCC.

Immunologics and chemotherapeutics for renal cell carcinoma

Treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma remains a challenge for clinicians. Traditional chemotherapy is ineffective and immunotherapy with interleukin-2 is only occasionally beneficial. The development of numerous agents targeting vascular endothelial growth factor and mammalian target of rapamycin signaling pathways that have been studied in phase III trials have resulted in significant improvement in survival for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Currently available U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved first line targeted agents include sunitinib, pazopanib, temsirolimus, and bevacizumab (with interferon), while axitinib, everolimus, and sorafenib are most extensively used following progression as second- or third line therapy. Attempts to augment the activity of these agents by combining them together or with chemotherapy or immunotherapy have not yet proven to improve outcomes. As a result, the sequential use of single agents remains the current standard of care.

Immunotherapy options in metastatic renal cell cancer: where we are and where we are going

The treatment of renal cell carcinoma is rapidly changing as a result of recent evidence concerning the efficacy of biological drugs, antiangiogenetic agents and signal-transduction inhibitors. This paper will provide a critical overview of the use of immunotherapy in renal cell carcinoma and review the available data concerning the efficacy of interferons, interleukin-2 and other forms of immunological treatment, particularly allogenic transplantation and vaccines. Moreover, it will focus on the new mechanisms of regulation of the immune system with a better understanding of the interaction between host and tumor, the role of T regulatory cells, heat-shock proteins and vaccines. The mechanism of action and the results obtained in renal cell carcinoma using the new molecular targeted drugs will be examined, along with the possibility of using immunotherapy combined with the new biological agents. Future research will not only need to make every effort to optimize the use of the new molecules and to define their efficacy precisely, but also to consider how to integrate these drugs with the traditional immunotherapy.

Renal cell carcinoma

Considerable progress has been made in the treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma, with innovative surgical and systemic strategies revolutionising the management of this disease. In localised disease, partial nephrectomy for small tumours and radical nephrectomy for large tumours continue to be the gold-standard treatments, with emphasis on approaches that have reduced invasiveness and preserve renal function. Additionally, cytoreductive nephrectomy is often indicated before the start of systemic treatment in patients with metastatic disease as part of integrated management strategy. The effectiveness of immunotherapy, although previously widely used for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma, is still controversial, and is mainly reserved for patients with good prognostic factors. Development of treatments that have specific targets in relevant biological pathways has been the main advance in treatment. Targeted drugs, including inhibitors of the vascular endothelial growth factor and mammalian target of rapamycin pathways, have shown robust effectiveness and offer new therapeutic options for the patients with metastatic disease.

The biology of interleukin-2 efficacy in the treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the eighth most common malignancy in adults in the United States. More than 50% of individuals present with metastatic disease and conventional chemotherapeutic strategies have been associated with poor response rates. Immunotherapy with Interleukin (IL)-2, however, induces durable remission, achieving >10 year recurrence free survival in 5-10% of patients with advanced RCC. First described as a T cell growth factor, IL-2 has a wide spectrum of effects in the immune system. Some of the possible mechanisms by which IL-2 carries out its anticancer effects include the augmentation of cytotoxic immune cell functions and reversal of T cell anergy, enabling delivery of immune cells and possibly serum components into tumor. IL-2 indirectly limits tumor escape mechanisms such as defective tumor cell expression of Class I or Class II molecules or expansion of regulatory T cells. Indirect effects on the tumor microenvironment are also likely and associated with rather dramatic T cell infiltration during the global delayed type hypersensitivity response that is associated with systemic IL-2 administration. The IL-2 signaling pathway, its effects on immune cells, and its role in various independent mechanisms of tumor surveillance likely play a role but little substantive data defining a clear phenotype or genotype of IL-2 responders distinguishing them from nonresponders has emerged in the last 25 years since IL-2 therapy was initiated. At best, we can only speculate that the disturbed homeostatic host/tumor interaction is reset in a small subset of patients allowing an antitumor response to recover or ensue.

Role of Cytokine Therapy in 2006 and Beyond for Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer

Metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) has a long history as a disease with poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. Immunotherapy has been the mainstay of treatment since the 1980s, and there have been a number of largely phase II studies examining various schedules of interferon-alpha and interleukin-2 based treatments. With the development of molecular targeted drugs the armentarium against mRCC has significantly expanded and cytokine treatments should be only directed at those most likely to benefit with durable remissions and prolonged survival.

Long-lasting remission of pulmonary metastases of renal cell cancer under IFN-beta therapy in a patient with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Immunomodulary therapy based on interferon (IFN)-a has been shown to be effective in a subset of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). IFN-Beta has occasionally been reported to induce remissions in RCC, but is well established in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). There is an ongoing debate whether hyperactivation of the immune system may convey protection against the development of cancer in MS patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A 54-year-old female MS patient underwent tumor nephrectomy for RCC in 1994. 1 year later, several bilateral pulmonary metastases were documented by computed tomography and were histologically confirmed thereafter. Therapy with IFN-Beta was started.

RESULTS

Soon after initiation of IFN-Beta treatment, the patient achieved an almost complete remission which is still ongoing after 10 years of IFN-Beta therapy.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the longest remission under IFN-Beta treatment ever reported in an RCC patient. We conclude that IFN-Beta should be particularly considered as a therapeutic option in the rare occasion of metastatic RCC in patients with MS.

Interferon alpha for the treatment of advanced renal cancer

This paper is an overview on the place of IFN-alpha in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (MRCC). After a presentation of MRCC and the mode of action of IFN-alpha, the results of studies including IFN-alpha alone or in combination with IL-2, chemotherapy and other biological modifiers are presented. Finally, new trends for new drugs, including antiangiogenic therapies, are discussed.

Renal cell carcinoma: Current status and future prospects

The incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is increasing. Despite improvements in the management of localized RCC, most patients are diagnosed with advanced RCC, which is often refractory and associated with a poor prognosis. Although surgery is the only curative treatment for localized RCC, improved diagnostic methods facilitating early detection and characterization of renal tumors have enabled more effective use of less invasive treatments. Adrenal-sparing radical total nephrectomy, and laparoscopic radical and total nephrectomy are increasingly being performed in preference to radical nephrectomy. However, standard treatments for advanced RCC are largely unsuccessful. Radiotherapy is often used to control symptoms associated with RCC in patients unsuitable for surgery. Immunotherapy with cytokines is the standard systemic treatment for advanced RCC, and is associated with prolonged survival in a subset of patients, but is generally poorly tolerated. An increased knowledge of the underlying pathophysiology of RCC has resulted in the identification of molecular pathways involved in tumor growth. Promising new agents designed to target these pathways are in development.

Chemotherapies and immunotherapies for metastatic kidney cancer

Most patients who develop kidney cancer are effectively treated with a radical nephrectomy; however, for those patients who present with or develop metastatic disease, the therapeutic options are limited. Interferon and interleukin-2 remain the standard therapies. Several studies have identified the optimal doses and schedules of these cytokines and groups of patients most likely to benefit from immunotherapy. Although cytotoxic chemotherapy continues to have a minor role in patients with clear cell renal carcinoma, it may become the treatment of choice for some patients with variant renal cancers. Novel agents targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor, its receptor, and other hypoxia-induced proteins are showing great promise and soon may expand the therapeutic options for patients with advanced kidney cancer.

Immunotherapy for advanced renal cell cancer

BACKGROUND

The course of advanced renal cell carcinoma is extremely variable, ranging from spontaneous remission to disease progression refractory to chemotherapy. Immunotherapy has held promise of improved outcomes based on uncontrolled studies and randomized controlled trials generally limited by small size and low power.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate immunotherapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma by comparing: (1) high dose interleukin-2 to other options and (2) interferon-alfa to other options. The primary outcome of interest was overall survival at one year, with remission as the main secondary outcome of interest.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A systematic search of the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases was conducted for the period 1966 through end of December 2003. Handsearches were made of the proceedings of the periodic meetings of the American Urologic Association, the American Society of Clinical Oncology, ECCO - the European Cancer Conference, and the European Society of Medical Oncology for the period 1995 to June 2004.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials that selected (or stratified) patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma, utilized an immunotherapeutic agent in at least one study arm, and reported remission or survival by allocation. Fifty-three identified studies involving 6117 patients were eligible and all but one reported remission; 32 of these studies reported the one-year survival outcome.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently abstracted each article by following a prospectively designed protocol. Dichotomous outcomes for treatment remission (partial plus complete) and for deaths at one year were used for the main comparisons. Survival hazard ratios were also used for studies of interferon-alfa versus controls, and for two randomized studies of the value of initial nephrectomy prior to interferon-alfa in fit patients with metastases detected at the time of diagnosis.

MAIN RESULTS

Combined data for a variety of immunotherapies gave an overall chance of partial or complete remission of only 12.9% (99 study arms), compared to 2.5% in 10 non-immunotherapy control arms, and 4.3% in two placebo arms. Twenty-eight percent of these remissions were designated as complete (data from 45 studies). Median survival averaged 13.3 months (range by arm, 6 to 27+ months). The difference in remission rate between arms was poorly correlated with the difference in median survival so that remission rate is not a good surrogate or intermediate outcome for survival for advanced renal cancer. We were unable to identify any published randomized study of high-dose interleukin-2 versus a non-immunotherapy control, or of high-dose interleukin-2 versus interferon-alfa reporting survival. It has been established that reduced dose interleukin-2 given by intravenous bolus or by subcutaneous injection provides equivalent survival to high dose interleukin-2 with less toxicity. Results from four studies (644 patients) indicate that interferon-alfa is superior to controls (OR for death at one year = 0.56, 95% confidence interval 0.40 to 0.77). Using the method of Parmar 1998, the pooled overall hazard ratio for death was 0.74 (95% confidence interval 0.63 to 0.88). The weighted average median improvement in survival was 3.8 months. T he optimal dose and duration of interferon-alfa remains to be elucidated. The addition of a variety of enhancers, including lower dose intravenous or subcutaneous interleukin-2, has failed to improve survival compared to interferon-alfa alone. Two recent randomized studies have examined the role of initial nephrectomy prior to interferon-alfa therapy in highly selected fit patients with metastases at diagnosis and minimal symptoms: despite minimal improvement in the chance of remission, both studies of up-front nephrectomy improved median survival by 4.8 months over interferon-alfa alone. Recent studies have been examining anti-angiogenesis agents. A landmark study of bevacizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody, was associated with significant prolongation of the time to progression of disease when given at high dose compared to low-dose or placebo therapy though frequency of remissions or survival were not improved.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

interferon-alfa provides a modest survival benefit compared to other commonly used treatments and should be considered for the control arm of future studies of systemic agents. In fit patients with metastases at diagnosis and minimal symptoms, nephrectomy followed by interferon-alfa gives the best survival strategy for fully validated therapies. The need for more effective specific therapy for this condition is apparent.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation: the next generation of therapy for metastatic renal cell cancer

The management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) remains a therapeutic challenge; less than 10% of patients survive for longer than 5 years. The resistance of renal cancer to chemotherapy may be explained by high levels of the multidrug resistance gene, MDR1. Immune-based treatments for renal cancer have been explored because of their unusual susceptibility to immunological assault. However, response rates to cytokines such as interleukin-2 and interferon-alpha have ranged from only 10% to 20%, prompting other immunotherapy approaches, such as allogeneic stem-cell transplantation, to be investigated. Several clinical trials have provided evidence of partial or complete disease regression in refractory mRCC following nonmyeloablative stem-cell transplantation. This effect is because of a donor antimalignancy effect mediated by immunocompetent donor T cells, called graft-versus-tumor effect. Unfortunately, less than 30% of patients who could have this procedure will have a human-leukocyte-antigen-compatible sibling, and attention is focusing on alternative donors such as matched unrelated donors and partially mismatched related donors. Despite the improved safety of nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens, transplant-related toxic effects (particularly graft-versus-host disease) remain obstacles to the safe and effective use of this treatment. Regardless of these limitations, innovative approaches have attempted to harness the potential of the graft-versus-tumor effect in mRCC and other solid tumors.

Application of IL-2 and other cytokines in renal cancer

Renal cell carcinoma evokes an immune response, which investigators have attempted to augment by administering cytokines in doses above physiological levels. In 1992, high-dose (HD) bolus interleukin-2 (IL-2) received US Food and Drug Administration approval for metastatic renal cell carcinoma based on data that revealed durable responses in a small percentage of patients. However, this regimen is associated with significant toxicity and cost, which has limited its application to highly selected patients treated at specialised centres. Several investigators have evaluated regimens with lower doses of IL-2 in an attempt to decrease toxicity. Attempts were also made to improve treatment efficacy by adding interferon (IFN)-alpha followed by 5-fluorouracil to low-dose IL-2 regimens. These regimens were reported to produce response rates and survival comparable to HD IL-2 with much less toxicity, but possibly fewer durable responses. Based on positive preclinical data, other cytokines (e.g., IFN-gamma, IL-12) have also been given to patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma with limited success. This review examines the clinical trials that have described the efficacy and toxicity of IL-2 and other cytokines in patients with renal cancer, with a particular focus on the Phase III trials that have helped to define the proper use of these agents.

Randomized phase II study of multiple dose levels of CCI-779, a novel mammalian target of rapamycin kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced refractory renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of multiple doses of CCI-779, a novel mammalian target of rapamycin kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced refractory renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients (n = 111) were randomly assigned to receive 25, 75, or 250 mg CCI-779 weekly as a 30-minute intravenous infusion. Patients were evaluated for tumor response, time to tumor progression, survival, and adverse events. Blood samples were collected to determine CCI-779 pharmacokinetics.

RESULTS

CCI-779 produced an objective response rate of 7% (one complete response and seven partial responses) and minor responses in 26% of these advanced RCC patients. Median time to tumor progression was 5.8 months and median survival was 15.0 months. The most frequently occurring CCI-779-related adverse events of all grades were maculopapular rash (76%), mucositis (70%), asthenia (50%), and nausea (43%). The most frequently occurring grade 3 or 4 adverse events were hyperglycemia (17%), hypophosphatemia (13%), anemia (9%), and hypertriglyceridemia (6%). Neither toxicity nor efficacy was significantly influenced by CCI-779 dose level. Patients were retrospectively classified into good-, intermediate-, or poor-risk groups on the basis of criteria used by Motzer et al for a first-line metastatic RCC population treated with interferon alfa. Within each risk group, the median survivals of patients at each dose level were similar.

CONCLUSION

In patients with advanced RCC, CCI-779 showed antitumor activity and encouraging survival and was generally well tolerated over the three dose levels tested.

Chemotherapeutic strategies for renal cell carcinoma

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a disease that is highly resistant to systemic chemotherapy. Responses to combination chemotherapy have been reported in patients with collecting duct carcinoma and the sarcomatoid variant of renal cancer. Clinical trials combining chemotherapy with biologic response modifiers have not resulted in significant advances in the treatment of RCC. Patients with advanced local or metastatic RCC should be offered investigational therapeutic options. The identification of novel agents with significantly improved antitumor activity remains a high priority in the treatment of this disease.

Immunotherapy for renal cell carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most prevalent malignancy within the kidney and the incidence is rising. Due to improved radiological evaluation over 50% of the renal cancers are found incidentally. Despite the fact that these incidentalomas are often confined to the kidney, around 50% of all patients diagnosed with kidney cancer will develop systemic disease. Metastatic RCC has a poor prognosis. Traditional treatment modalities like chemo- and radiotherapy show overall response percentages of 2-6%. In view of the observed spontaneous remissions of advanced renal cancer, immune mechanisms have been suggested to play a role in the natural disease course of RCC. At present, several non-specific cytokine regimens are used in the treatment of mRCC, e.g. interleukin-2 and interferon-alpha, in combination or as monotherapy or in combination with substances like 13-cis-retinoic acid and/or 5-fluorouracil. Collective data of trials evaluating cytokine-based therapies for mRCC show an overall response rate of approximately 15%, with 5% of the patients showing complete responses. More importantly, cytokine treatment clearly translates into a significant survival benefit in a subset of patients. Nevertheless, the toxicity profile of these cytokine regimens is significant. With the enhanced knowledge of tumor-immunology, the identification of immunogenic tumor proteins, and antibodies recognizing tumor-associated antigens, new treatment strategies with increased specificity and fewer side effects are of interest. Here we review the different immunotherapeutical modalities currently used as well as new approaches for the treatment of advanced RCC.

Prognostic factors and clinical trials of new agents in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains a disease highly resistant to systemic therapy. Results of recent reports in the literature on prognostic factors and clinical trials for patients with metastatic RCC were reviewed. Small numbers of patients exhibit complete or partial responses to interferon and/or interleukin-2, but most patients do not respond and there are few long-term survivors. Therefore, the identification of new agents with better antitumor activity against metastases remains the highest priority of clinical investigation in this refractory tumor. Prospective identification of patients more likely to benefit from cytokine therapy could be used as a stratification factor in Phase III trials, and in risk-directed therapy.

Potential of interferon-alpha in solid tumours: part 1

Interferon-alpha (IFNalpha) is a pleiotropic cytokine with direct and indirect antitumour effects. These include prolongation of the cell cycle time of malignant cells, inhibition of biosynthetic enzymes and apoptosis, interaction with other cytokines, and immunomodulatory and antiangiogenic effects. The first clinical trials in solid tumours used crude preparations of natural IFNalpha and demonstrated that tumour regressions in solid tumours and haematological malignancies were possible. Since the advent of genetic engineering technology, recombinant (r) IFNalpha has been widely evaluated in solid tumours. This review discusses the use and potential of rIFNalpha in solid tumours; the first part focuses on malignant melanoma and metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). In the adjuvant treatment of malignant melanoma, rIFNalpha has been tested in randomised trials in more than 6000 patients. High-dosage IFNalpha (> or =10MU) prolongs disease-free survival (DFS) but not overall survival (OS). Low-dosage IFNalpha (< or =3MU) has not been shown to prolong DFS or OS, and current data do not support its use outside clinical trials. The latest United Kingdom Co-ordinating Committee on Cancer Research meta-analysis of ten randomised trials that used adjuvant rIFNalpha has shown that there is a benefit in DFS but not OS. No conclusions can be reached for intermediate-dosage IFNalpha (5 to 10MU) until the mature results of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) study 18952 are available. In RCC, current evidence does not support the use of adjuvant IFNalpha. In metastatic malignant melanoma and RCC, reported response rates to rIFNalpha are approximately 15%. In a minority of responding patients, however, these responses can be long-standing. In metastatic malignant melanoma, IFNalpha combined with other cytotoxic agents with or without interleukin-2 has achieved high response rates but has not improved survival. In metastatic RCC, intermediate dosages of rIFNalpha should be used and therapy should probably be prolonged (>12 months); response depends on prognostic factors such as good performance status, whereas survival is affected by factors such as low tumour burden. Nephrectomy should therefore be considered in patients with good performance status prior to IFNalpha immunotherapy in advanced RCC, even in patients with metastatic disease. The toxicity of high-dosage IFNalpha and the lack of definite benefit on OS with high- or low-dosage IFNalpha do not support its use outside clinical trials. Data from the ongoing US Intergroup studies, the ongoing EORTC 18991 study (long-term therapy with pegylated IFNalpha) and mature data from EORTC 18952 (intermediate-dosage IFNalpha) will help establish the role of IFNalpha as adjuvant therapy in malignant melanoma.

The role of systemic chemotherapy in the treatment of kidney cancer

Traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy has been considered to be ineffective in renal cell carcinoma, likely due to multiple mechanisms of high-level drug resistance proteins such as p-glycoprotein expressed by these cancers. Nonetheless, low level activity of several nucleoside analogues and the elucidation of critical molecular pathways and targets in this disease, such as the angiogenic pathway, provide hope that important advances can and will be made.

A phase I trial of weekly gemcitabine and subcutaneous interferon alpha in patients with refractory renal cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Recombinant human interferon-a2b (rHuIFN-alpha2b) and Interleukin-2 have limited effectiveness in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (MRCC). Gemcitabine (Gemzar) is also reported to have activity against MRCC, and recent in vitro, in nude mice xenografts, and human data suggests increased activity of gemcitabine (Gemzar) when combined with IFN-alpha2b.

PURPOSE

A phase I clinical trial utilizing gemcitabine (Gemzar and rHuIFN-alpha2b was conducted in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

METHODS

Treatment consisted of: gemcitabine (Gemzar) 600 mg/m2 I.V. weekly and rHuIFN-alpha2b 1.0 MU/m2 (dose level A) or 3.0MU/m2 S.C. (dose level B) three times a week for 6 weeks with a 2 weeks rest period.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were entered into the trial and were evaluated. Dose limiting toxicity was predominantly hematologic, and was seen at dose level B. This included grade 3 anemia (1 patient), neutropenia (1 patient), and nausea (1 patient) and grade 4 neutropenia (1 patient). The maximal tolerated dose was gemcitabine (Gemzar) 600 mg/m2 I.V. weekly and rHuIFN-alpha2b 1.0 MU/m2 three times a week.

CONCLUSION

This combination of gemcitabine (Gemzar) and rHuIFN-alpha2b has significant hematologic toxicity despite low doses of each agent. Further investigation of this combination using this schedule is not recommended.

Therapeutic options in the management of renal cell carcinoma

Approximately 31,000 new cases of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are diagnosed in the United States each year and 30% to 40% of these will eventually become metastatic disease. The primary tumor often grows to considerable size before symptoms are apparent, which could explain the high rate of metastatic RCC (mRCC). The median survival of mRCC after diagnosis is 8 to 12 months and the 5-year survival is less than ideal. Traditionally, surgery has been the treatment of choice for mRCC. Chemotherapeutic agents tested so far have been disappointing, perhaps because of a high expression of the multidrug resistance gene or the high content of glutathione in RCC cells. However, the spontaneous regression of mRCC in some cases suggests that these tumor cells are responsive to immunologic mechanisms. Initial interest has focused on two cytokines, interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) and interleukin-2 (IL-2), with response rates ranging from 15% to 20%. Both IL-2 and IFN-alpha are pleiotropic compounds with specific effects on many leukocyte subsets, in addition to directly affecting tumor proliferation, angiogenesis, and antigen expression. The mechanisms by which these immunoenhancing cytokines exert antitumor effects are still unknown. However, many agree that activation of T cells and natural killer cells is a pivotal part of the antitumor efficacy. For example, some investigators have found that pretreatment levels of natural killer cells and T cells predict a response to IL-2 and IFN-alpha in mRCC. Others report a relationship between activation of peripheral blood lymphocytes and response to cytokine therapy. Expansion of activated T cells in blood during treatment with these two cytokines seems to relate to clinical efficacy in patients with RCC.

Interferon-alfa as a comparative treatment for clinical trials of new therapies against advanced renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

To define outcome data and prognostic criteria for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with interferon-alfa as initial systemic therapy. The data can be applied to design and interpretation of clinical trials of new agents and treatment programs against this refractory malignancy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four hundred sixty-three patients with advanced RCC administered interferon-alpha as first-line systemic therapy on six prospective clinical trials were the subjects of this retrospective analysis. Three risk categories for predicting survival were identified on the basis of five pretreatment clinical features by a stratified Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

The median overall survival time was 13 months. The median time to progression was 4.7 months. Five variables were used as risk factors for short survival: low Karnofsky performance status, high lactate dehydrogenase, low serum hemoglobin, high corrected serum calcium, and time from initial RCC diagnosis to start of interferon-alpha therapy of less than one year. Each patient was assigned to one of three risk groups: those with zero risk factors (favorable risk), those with one or two (intermediate risk), and those with three or more (poor risk). The median time to death of patients deemed favorable risk was 30 months. Median survival time in the intermediate-risk group was 14 months. In contrast, the poor-risk group had a median survival time of 5 months.

CONCLUSION

Progression-free and overall survival with interferon-alpha treatment can be compared with new therapies in phase II and III clinical investigations. The prognostic model is suitable for risk stratification of phase III trials using interferon-alpha as the comparative treatment arm.

New agents for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma

One-third of patients with renal cell carcinoma present with unresectable or metastatic disease. Immunotherapy, the current standard treatment, induces response in only 10-20% of patients. Chemotherapy with current agents is minimally effective. Other approaches including allogeneic stem cell transplant, vaccine and gene therapy and signal transduction inhibitors, offer promise in early Phase studies. This paper reviews the current treatment options and promising new agents in development.

Feasibility of prolonged use of interferon-alpha in metastatic kidney carcinoma: a phase II study

BACKGROUND

Interferon-alpha has proven effective in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. However, the optimal schedule has not yet been determined. The authors have studied the efficacy and toxicity of prolonged use interferon-alpha2a (IFN-alpha) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Interferon-alpha was administered intermittently for outpatients.

METHODS

Seventy-five patients with metastatic RCC without prior biochemotherapy were treated. During the first month, the IFN-alpha dose was increased from 4.5 to 18 million units (MU) 3 times a week to define the individual maximal tolerated dose for each patient. The treatment was continued at the maximal tolerated dose with a 1-week pause each month until either progression or intolerable toxicity was observed or up to 2 years.

RESULTS

The overall response rate (5 complete response [CRs] and 8 partial responses [PRs]) was 17% (95% confidence interval, 10-28%). Stable disease was observed in 32 patients (43%). Three late objective responses (4%) occurred after 12 months treatment. The median progression free time of all patients was 12.3 months, and median survival time was 19.3 months. The median duration of response in CR/PR patients was 16 months. In multivariate analysis independent prognostic factors were poor performance status (P = 0.004), presence of bone metastases (P = 0.001), and time to metastases less than 24 months (P = 0.003), which predicted poor survival. Six patients (8%) discontinued the treatment because of fatigue, elevation of liver enzymes, or cardiac arrhythmias. No life-threatening side effects were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged and intermittently administered IFN-alpha2a three times per week in 3 weekly cycles in metastatic RCC is a feasible and effective therapy. A prolonged treatment duration of more than 12 months for stable and responding patients is beneficial and may improve the outcome of patients with RCC.

Biologic response modifiers in pediatric cancer

Biologic response modifiers are becoming an important addition to surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy in the management of cancer. As this field of research grows and expands, more biologic response modifiers will be incorporated into therapeutic regimens. By stimulating the immune system to eradicate minimal residual disease, these agents may improve the disease-free and long-term survival rates of patients with a variety of malignancies. The challenge is to incorporate biologic response modifiers into the treatment armamentarium in ways that will maximize their tumorigenicity.

Cytokine therapy in renal cell cancer

Despite extensive investigations with many different treatment modalities, metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains a disease highly resistant to systemic therapy. The outlook for patients with metastatic RCC is poor, with a 5-year survival rate of less than 10%. Late relapses after nephrectomy, prolonged stable disease in the absence of systemic therapy, and rare spontaneous regression are clinical observations that suggest host immune mechanisms could be important in regulating tumor growth. Interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) have been extensively studied in advanced RCC with responses in the 10 to 20% range. Two randomized trials suggest that treatment with IFN-alpha compared with vinblastine or medroxyprogesterone results in a small improvement in survival. Prolonged responses with high-dose IL-2 is significant but is accompanied by formidable toxicity. Although the combination of IFN-alpha and IL-2 compared with monotherapy with IFN-alpha or IL-2 increases the response proportion, no improvement in survival could be demonstrated in a recent randomized trial. In addition, three randomized trials showed no survival benefit associated with IFN-alpha therapy given as adjuvant therapy following complete resection of locally advanced RCC. Small numbers of patients exhibit complete or partial responses to IFN-alpha and/or IL-2, but most patients do not respond and there are few long-term survivors. Clinical investigation of new agents and treatment programs to identify improved antitumor activity against metastases remain the highest priorities in this refractory disease.

Phase III trial of interferon alfa-2a with or without 13-cis-retinoic acid for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

A randomized phase III trial was conducted to determine whether combination therapy with 13-cis-retinoic acid (13-CRA) plus interferon alfa-2a (IFNalpha2a) is superior to IFNalpha2a alone in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred eighty-four patients were randomized to treatment with IFNalpha2a plus 13-CRA or treatment with IFNalpha2a alone. IFNalpha2a was given daily subcutaneously, starting at a dose of 3 million units (MU). The dose was escalated every 7 days from 3 to 9 MU (by increments of 3 MU), unless >/= grade 2 toxicity occurred, in which case dose escalation was stopped. Patients randomized to combination therapy were given oral 13-CRA 1 mg/kg/d plus IFNalpha2a. Quality of life (QOL) was assessed.

RESULTS

Complete or partial responses were achieved by 12% of patients treated with IFNalpha2a plus 13-CRA and 6% of patients treated with IFNalpha2a (P =.14). Median duration of response (complete and partial combined) in the group treated with the combination was 33 months (range, 9 to 50 months), versus 22 months (range, 5 to 38 months) for the second group (P =.03). Nineteen percent of patients treated with IFNalpha2a plus 13-CRA were progression-free at 24 months, compared with 10% of patients treated with IFNalpha2a alone (P =.05). Median survival time for all patients was 15 months, with no difference in survival between the two treatment arms (P =.26). QOL decreased during the first 8 weeks of treatment, and a partial recovery followed. Lower scores were associated with the combination therapy.

CONCLUSION

Response proportion and survival did not improve significantly with the addition of 13-CRA to IFNalpha2a therapy in patients with advanced RCC. 13-CRA may lengthen response to IFNalpha2a therapy in patients with IFNalpha2a-sensitive tumors. Treatment, particularly the combination therapy, was associated with a decrease in QOL.

Immunotherapy for advanced renal cell cancer

BACKGROUND

The course of advanced renal cell carcinoma is extremely variable, ranging from spontaneous remission to disease progression refractory to chemotherapy. Immunotherapy has held promise of improved outcomes based on uncontrolled studies and randomized controlled trials generally limited by small size and low power.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate immunotherapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma by comparing: (1) high dose interleukin-2 to other options and (2) interferon-alpha to other options.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A search of MEDLINE, Cancerlit, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases from 1966 through the end of 1999. Handsearches were made of the proceedings of the annual meetings of the American Urologic Association, ASCO, and biennial European ECCO meetings, and the references of identified studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials that selected (or stratified) patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma, utilized an immunotherapeutic agent in at least one study arm, and reported response or survival by allocation. Forty-two studies involving 4216 patients were eligible and reported response and 26 of these reported survival outcome (3089 patients).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two independent reviewers abstracted each article by following a prospectively designed protocol. Dichotomous outcomes for treatment response (partial plus complete) and for deaths at one year were used for the main comparisons. Survival hazard ratios were also used for studies of interferon-alpha versus controls.

MAIN RESULTS

The average response rate was 10.2 % (range by arm, 0 - 39%) and complete response rate was 3.2% (123/3852; n = 38 studies). Median survival averaged 11.6 months (range by arm, 6 - 28 months) and two-year survival averaged 22% (16 studies, range by arm 8 - 41%). There were no placebo-controlled studies and no randomized controlled studies examined survival for high dose interleukin-2 versus controls. Results from 6 studies (n = 963) indicate that interferon-alpha is superior to controls (OR for death at one year = 0.67, 95% CI 0.50 - 0.89. The pooled hazard ratio for survival of 0.78 (0.67 - 0.90) indicates that the treatment effect persisted until 24 months from randomization. The weighted average median improvement in survival was 2.6 months. Additional comparisons failed to prove a survival benefit from the addition of other agents to either modified schedules of interleukin-2 or to interferon-alpha. Dose-response studies examining survival for either agent could not be identified. The difference in response rate between arms was correlated with the difference in survival (P<0.001) suggesting that response rate difference may be a surrogate intermediate endpoint for survival.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Interferon-alpha provides a modest survival benefit compared to other commonly used treatments and should be considered for the control arm of future studies of systemic agents. Interleukin-2 has not been validated in controlled randomized studies.

Prospective randomized trial of interferon alfa-2a plus vinblastine versus vinblastine alone in patients with advanced renal cell cancer

PURPOSE

The combination of interferon alfa-2a (IFNalpha2a) plus vinblastine (VLB) induces objective tumor responses in patients with advanced renal cell cancer. However, no prospective randomized trial has shown that this treatment prolongs overall survival. We compared overall survival after treatment with IFNalpha2a plus VLB versus VLB alone in patients with advanced renal cell cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We prospectively randomized 160 patients with locally advanced or metastatic renal cell cancer to receive either VLB alone or IFNalpha2a plus VLB for 12 months or until progression of disease. In both groups, VLB was administered intravenously at 0.1 mg/kg every 3 weeks, and in the combination group IFNalpha2a was administered subcutaneously at 3 million units three times a week for 1 week, and 18 million units three times a week thereafter for the second and subsequent weeks. For patients unable totolerate IFNalpha2a at 18 million units per injection, the dose was reduced to 9 million units.

RESULTS

Median survival was 67.6 weeks for the 79 patients receiving IFNalpha2a plus VLB and 37.8 weeks for the 81 patients treated with VLB (P =.0049). Overall response rates were 16. 5% for patients treated with IFNalpha2a plus VLB and 2.5% for patients treated with VLB alone (P =.0025). Treatment with the combination was associated with constitutional symptoms and abnormalities in laboratory parameters, but no toxic deaths were reported.

CONCLUSION

The combination of IFNalpha2a plus VLB is superior to VLB alone in the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma. This is the first study to demonstrate that survival can be prolonged by using IFNalpha2a for these patients.

Renal cell carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is characterized by (a) lack of early warning signs, which results in a high proportion of patients with metastases at the time of diagnosis; (b) protean clinical manifestations; and (c) resistance to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The estimates of new diagnoses and deaths from kidney cancer in the United States during 1996 are 30,600 and 12,000, respectively. RCC occurs nearly twice as often in men as in women. The age at diagnosis is generally older than 40 years; the median age is in the midsixties. The incidence of RCC has been rising steadily. Between 1974 and 1990, there was a 38% increase in the number of patients who had a diagnosis of RCC. This increase was accompanied by a significant improvement in 5-year survival. Both trends are likely the result of improved diagnostic capability. Newer radiographic techniques, including ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, are detecting kidney tumors more frequently and at a lower disease stage, when tumors can be resected for cure. Surgical treatment is the only curative therapy for localized RCC. Radical nephrectomy remains the mainstay of surgical management, but techniques are being modified. These modifications include partial nephrectomy and resection of vena caval thrombi. In highly selected cases, surgical resection of locally recurrent RCC or of disease at a solitary metastatic site is associated with long-term survival. Metastatic RCC is highly resistant to the many systemic therapies that have been extensively investigated. A minority of patients achieve complete or partial response to interferon, interleukin-2, or both. Response can be dramatic but is rarely durable. Because most patients do not achieve response, these agents are not considered effective treatments for RCC, but the response in some patients indicates the need for continued research on their use. Identification of new agents with better antitumor activity against metastases remains a high priority in clinical investigation of therapy for this refractory disease.

Treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma with constant-rate floxuridine infusion plus recombinant alpha 2b-interferon

BACKGROUND

Floxuridine (FUDR) and alpha-interferon (IFN) are active agents in advanced renal cell carcinoma, with different dose-limiting toxic effects and antitumor synergism in experimental models. The main purpose of this phase II study was to assess the activity and toxic effects of a combination of FUDR and alpha 2b-IFN in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients with measurable disease entered the study. FUDR was administered as a constant-rate continuous infusion for 14 days every 28 days at a starting daily dose of 0.1 mg/kg and with dose escalations of 0.025 mg/kg/day at each subsequent cycle if WHO > or = 2 toxicity had not occurred. IFN-alpha 2b 10 x 10(6) I.U. was administered intramuscularly 3 times per week.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients entered the study and a total of 272 cycles of FUDR + alpha 2b-IFN were administered. In 41 evaluable patients WHO grade III-IV toxic effects included nausea and vomiting (22%), diarrhea (32%), stomatitis (12%), fatigue (27%) and anorexia (12%). It was possible to increase the initial FUDR does in 21 (50%) patients; the median FUDR dose intensity was 0.35 mg/kg/week (range 0.18-0.54). Among 39 evaluable patients, 3 (7.5%) complete and 10 (25.5%) partial responses were observed (response rate 33%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 19%-50%) which lasted a median of 13 months (5.5-40+). Responses also occurred in liver (2), in patients pretreated with systemic therapy (5) and in patients who had other unfavourable prognostic characteristics (7). Median progression-free and survival times were 9 and 16 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study FUDR + alpha 2b-IFN demonstrated interesting activity in metastatic renal cell carcinoma, showing promise also in patients with unfavourable prognostic characteristics. The antitumor activity of FUDR and alpha 2b-IFN seems to be cumulative, but cumulative toxicity is also observed. These results require confirmation in randomised trials.