Cisplatin plus etoposide with and without ifosfamide in extensive small-cell lung cancer: a Hoosier Oncology Group study

Recent advances and future strategies in first-line treatment of ES-SCLC

Recent advancements in treating extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) have been significantly marked by incorporating immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) into platinum-based chemotherapy, leading to modest yet notable improvements in patient outcomes, which become more evident with longer follow-up. However, critical challenges persist, such as identifying effective biomarkers for accurate patient selection or finding more effective drugs. This review delves into the current and evolving treatment landscape for ES-SCLC, focusing on the most promising therapeutic strategies under investigation. We discuss the latest developments in the use of newer ICIs, antiangiogenic agents, PARP inhibitors (PARPi), lurbinectedin, and anti-DLL3 agents, offering insights into potential future directions in the management of this aggressive cancer.

Systemic Therapy for Small-Cell Lung Cancer: ASCO-Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) Guideline

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing clinicians on the management of patients with small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

An Expert Panel of medical oncology, thoracic surgery, radiation oncology, pulmonary, community oncology, research methodology, and advocacy experts were convened to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials published from 1990 through 2022. Outcomes of interest included response rates, overall survival, disease-free survival or recurrence-free survival, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 95 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Evidence-based recommendations were developed to address systemic therapy options, timing of therapy, treatment in patients who are older or with poor performance status, role of biomarkers, and use of myeloid-supporting agents in patients with small-cell lung cancer.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/thoracic-cancer-guidelines.

Recent advances in small cell lung cancer: the future is now?

Small cell lung cancer is a relevant clinical issue as it is a highly malignant cancer, often diagnosed in advanced stage. Similarly to non-small cell lung cancer, tobacco smoking is currently the main risk factor. Its incidence, at least in males, has declined over the past decades, due to the worldwide decreased percentage of active smokers. The typical small cells of this tumor type are characterized by a high Proliferation Index, chromosomal deletions such as 3p(14-23) involving the tumor-suppressor gene FHIT, alterations of the MYC or Notch family proteins and the frequent expression of neuroendocrine markers. The combination of thoracic radiotherapy and chemotherapy is the standard treatment for limited stage disease, while platinum-based chemotherapy is the most effective choice for extensive stage disease. Unfortunately, whatever chemotherapy is used, the results are disappointing. No regimen has proved to be effective in the long run, indeed small cell lung cancer rapidly progresses after a frequent initial strong response, and the mortality rate remains still high. The advent of immunotherapy is actually changing the landscape in oncology. As well as in other cancers, recent trials have demonstrated the efficacy of the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy, opening new perspectives for the future of our patients.

Treatment patterns and burden of myelosuppression for patients with small cell lung cancer: A SEER-medicare study

PURPOSE

To depict the treatment journey for patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and evaluate health care resource utilization (HCRU) associated with myelosuppression, a complication induced by chemotherapy or chemotherapy plus radiation therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a descriptive, retrospective study of patients with SCLC aged ≥65 years, identified from linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data curated between January 2012 and December 2015. Treatment types (chemotherapy, radiation therapy, surgery) were classified as first, second, or third line, depending on the temporal sequence in which regimens were prescribed. For each year, the proportions of patients completing 4- or 6-cycle chemotherapy regimens, with hospital admissions associated with myelosuppression, or who used granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs), blood/platelet transfusions, or erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), were calculated.

RESULTS

Chemotherapy was administered as initial treatment in 7,807/11,907 (65.6%) patients whose treatment journey was recorded. Approximately one-third (n = 3,985) subsequently received radiation therapy. In total, 5,791 (57.8%) patients completed the guideline-recommended 4-6 cycles of chemotherapy. Among all chemotherapy-treated patients, 10,370 (74.3%) experienced ≥1 inpatient admission associated with myelosuppression (anemia, 7,366 [52.8%]; neutropenia, 4,642 [33.3%]; thrombocytopenia, 2,375 [17.0%]; pancytopenia, 1,983 [14.2%]). Supportive care interventions included G-CSF (6,756 [48.4%] patients), ESAs (1,534 [11.0%]), and transfusions (3,674 [26.3%]).

CONCLUSION

Chemotherapy remains a cornerstone of care for patients with SCLC. Slightly over half of patients completed the recommended number of cycles, underscoring the frailty of patients and aggressiveness of SCLC. HCRU associated with myelosuppression was prominent, suggesting a substantial burden on older patients with SCLC.

Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 2.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) provide recommended management for patients with SCLC, including diagnosis, primary treatment, surveillance for relapse, and subsequent treatment. This selection for the journal focuses on metastatic (known as extensive-stage) SCLC, which is more common than limited-stage SCLC. Systemic therapy alone can palliate symptoms and prolong survival in most patients with extensive-stage disease. Smoking cessation counseling and intervention should be strongly promoted in patients with SCLC and other high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas. The "Summary of the Guidelines Updates" section in the SCLC algorithm outlines the most recent revisions for the 2022 update, which are described in greater detail in this revised Discussion text.

History of Extensive Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment: Time to Raise the Bar? A Review of the Literature

Simple Summary

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains the most aggressive form of neuroendocrine tumor of the lung, for which treatment options remain limited. The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors has modified for the first time the therapeutic strategies in patients with extensive disease after decades. New therapeutic approaches are required. Deeper knowledge of tumor biology is required to gain new insights into this complex disease.

Abstract

Several trials have tried for decades to improve the outcome of extensive disease small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC) through attempts to modify the standard treatments. Nevertheless, platinum/etoposide combination and topotecan have remained respectively the first and the second line standard treatments for the last 40 years. With the advent of immunotherapy, this scenario has finally changed. Our review aims to provide an overview of the primary studies on the actual therapeutic strategies available for ED-SCLC patients, and to highlight emerging evidence supporting the use of immunotherapy in SCLC patients.

Systematic evaluation of the efficacy-effectiveness gap of systemic treatments in extensive disease small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to assess how clinical outcomes in real-world (effectiveness) correspond to the outcomes in clinical trials (efficacy) of systemic treatments for extensive disease small cell lung cancer (ED SCLC).

METHODS

All patients diagnosed with ED SCLC between 2008 and 2014 in six Dutch large teaching hospitals (Santeon network) were identified and followed-up from date of diagnosis until death or end of data collection. For every patient, an efficacy-effectiveness factor (EE factor) was calculated by dividing individual patients' overall survival (OS) by the pooled median OS assessed from clinical trials with the respective treatment.

RESULTS

From 792 diagnosed patients, 568 (72%) started with first-line treatment. Overall, the median EE factor was 0.79 (P < .001 from 1.00). Poor performance status (ECOG≥2) and a higher age at diagnosis (age ≥ 65 years) were independent predictors for a lower EE factor. The EE gap was 43% in patients with both age ≥ 65 years and ECOG ≥2 (EE factor 0.57). The mean age and the proportion of patients with ECOG≥2 in real-world were different from those in clinical trials (mean age of 66 versus 62 years, and ECOG≥2 25% versus 17%; both P < .001).

CONCLUSION

OS of patients with ED SCLC treated with systemic therapy in real-world practice is 21% shorter than for patients included in trials. Age at diagnosis and performance status partly explain this gap.

Systemic therapy for limited stage small cell lung carcinoma

Systemic treatment in small cell lung carcinoma has been a challenge for oncologists for decades. The high propensity for recurrence is usually due to distant metastasis, which makes systemic treatment an essential component of treatment in small cell lung carcinoma. The regimen of cisplatin and etoposide (established in the mid-1980’s) concurrently with thoracic radiotherapy followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) remains the standard of care in limited stage disease. Despite numerous trials, this regimen has not been improved upon. The standard combination regimen of cisplatin and etoposide has been compared to alternative platinum-containing regimens with drugs like epirubicin, irinotecan, paclitaxel, topotecan, pemetrexed, amrubicin and belotecan. Non-platinum containing regimens like ifosfamide and etoposide have also been tested. Attempts to intensify therapy have included the addition of a third drug like paclitaxel, ifosfamide, tirapazamine, tamoxifen, and thalidomide. Maintenance therapy following induction with chemotherapy, vandetanib and interferon-alpha have also been attempted. Molecularly directed targeted therapies and immunotherapeutic agents are areas of active research. In this review, we discuss the various systemic therapy options in limited stage small cell lung carcinoma, from the historical regimens to the modern-day therapy and promising areas of research. We also discuss the role of growth factors, the optimal number of chemotherapy cycles, the use of prognostic and predictive factors, the optimal timing of chemotherapy and the treatment of special populations of patients including older patients, and patients with comorbidities.

Temozolomide and oral etoposide in children with recurrent malignant brain tumors

Despite advances in the treatment of brain tumors, the prognosis of children with recurrent malignant brain tumors remains poor. Etoposide (VP-16), an inhibitor of nuclear enzyme deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)-topoisomerase II, has shown activity in brain tumors. Its efficacy appears schedule dependent but, to date, the most effective schedule of administration has not been well defined. Temozolomide (TMZ), like VP-16, penetrates the blood–brain barrier and has activity against malignant brain tumors. This novel alkylating agent is rapidly absorbed and is highly bioavailable after oral administration. The antitumor activity of TMZ has been shown to be schedule dependent. Based on the evidence of different mechanisms of cytotoxicity, TMZ and VP-16 have been utilized in combination in patients with malignant brain tumors. This review evaluates the results derived from the combination use of TMZ and oral VP-16. The reported data suggest potential activity of oral VP-16 and TMZ alone or in combination. Further clinical trials are needed to explore and confirm their promising activity in relapsed brain neoplasms.

New insights into small-cell lung cancer development and therapy

Small‐cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 15% of lung cancer cases; however, it is characterized by easy relapse and low survival rate, leading to one of the most intractable diseases in clinical practice. Despite decades of basic and clinical research, little progress has been made in the management of SCLC. The current standard first‐line regimens of SCLC still remain to be cisplatin or carboplatin combined with etoposide, and the adverse events of chemotherapy are by no means negligible. Besides, the immunotherapy on SCLC is still in an early stage and novel studies are urgently needed. In this review, we describe SCLC development and current therapy, aiming at providing useful advices on basic research and clinical strategy.

Utilization of Antineoplastic Agents and Medicare Spending in Elderly Patients With Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer Between 2001 and 2013

PURPOSE

Some elderly patients (≥ 65 years old) with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) do not receive chemotherapy likely because of fear of toxicity and uncertainty regarding benefits. Thus, we aimed to study real-world trends in utilization of antineoplastics over the years and predictors of utilization, survival, and Medicare expenditure in elderly patients with extensive-stage (ES) SCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using the linked SEER and Medicare database, we identified elderly patients with newly diagnosed ES-SCLC between 2001 and 2013. The Wald test was used to determine the significance of trends. Cox proportional hazards models were applied for survival analyses. We used SAS, version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

RESULTS

We identified 15,763 patients with newly diagnosed ES-SCLC. Approximately 6,838 patients (43.38%) received antineoplastics, and 8,925 patients (56.61%) received supportive care only. Every year since 2001, the percentage of patients receiving antineoplastics has decreased (45.8% v 36.6% in 2001 and 2013, respectively; P_trend < .0001). Patients with advanced age (P < .001), patients from high-poverty areas (P < .001) or rural areas (P = .005), patients with Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 3 (P < .001), and non-Hispanic blacks (P = .003) and Hispanics (P = .001) were less likely to receive antineoplastics. Mean Medicare spending per patient decreased over the study period for patients treated with antineoplastics ($45,998 in 2001 and $35,053 in 2013; P_trend < .001) and for those receiving supportive care only ($34,197 in 2001 and $25,265 in 2013; P_trend < .001).

CONCLUSION

Decreasing utilization of antineoplastics in elderly patients with ES-SCLC since 2001 could be partly secondary to higher comorbidities and physiologic age, leading to poor candidacy. Medicare expenditures decreased likely as a result of value-based treatment initiatives by the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services. However, expenditures are likely to increase with use of expensive novel agents.

Dashing Decades of Defeat: Long Anticipated Advances in the First-line Treatment of Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an exceptionally lethal subtype of lung cancer. For patients with extensive-stage (ES) disease, which is the majority of patients, platinum-doublet chemotherapy has been the standard of care for decades. Dozens of phase III trials have failed to improve survival over standard platinum plus etoposide. Recent results, however, have met with long-overdue success. This manuscript reviews the new standards of care for ES-SCLC.

RECENT FINDINGS

Two recent phase III trials have shown an improvement in overall survival with concurrent immunotherapy and chemotherapy. In IMpower 133, the addition of the anti-PD-L1 antibody atezolizumab to carboplatin plus etoposide significantly improved both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). This was the first trial in over 30 years to improve survival. In CASPIAN, concurrent durvalumab, another anti-PD-L1 antibody, also led to an improvement in survival. While there is clearly a need to further improve outcomes, the improvement in survival with the addition of atezolizumab or durvalumab to platinum-doublet chemotherapy is a major advance. We now have new standards of care and the potential of a more meaningful benefit for patients with advanced SCLC.

A multidisciplinary expert opinion on CINV and RINV, unmet needs and practical real-life approaches

Introduction: A range of combination chemotherapy regimens are currently used in clinical practice. However, international antiemetic guidelines often only categorize the emetogenic potential of single agents rather than the emetogenicity of combination chemotherapy regimens. To manage the nausea and vomiting induced by antineoplastic combinations, guidelines suggest antiemetics that are appropriate for the component drug with the highest emetogenic potential. Furthermore, antiemetic guidelines generally do not consider the influence of other factors, including individual patient characteristics, on the emetic effects of cancer treatments. Similarly, the emetogenic potential of radiotherapy is stratified only according to the site of radiation, while other factors contributing to emetic risk are overlooked.Areas covered: An Expert Panel was convened to examine unresolved issues and summarize the current clinical research on managing nausea and vomiting associated with combination chemotherapy and radiotherapy.Expert opinion: The panel identified the incidence of nausea and vomiting induced by multi-drug combination therapies currently used to treat cancer at different anatomic sites and by radiotherapy in the presence of other risk factors. Based on these data and the clinical experience of panel members, several suggestions are made for a practical approach to prevent or manage nausea and vomiting due to chemotherapy regimens and radiation therapy.

A systematic review of survival following anti-cancer treatment for small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of survival following treatment recommended by the European Society of Medical Oncology for SCLC in order to determine a benchmark for novel therapies to be compared with.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting overall survival following chemotherapy for SCLC were included. We calculated survival at 30 and 90-days along with 1-year, 2-year and median.

RESULTS

We identified 160 for inclusion. There were minimal 30-day deaths. Survival was 99 % (95 %CI 98.0-99.0 %, I²33.9 %, n = 77) and 90 % (95 %CI 89.0-92.0 %, I²79.5 %, n = 73) at 90 days for limited (LD-SCLC) and extensive stage (ED-SCLC) respectively. The median survival for LD-SCLC was 18.1 months (95 %CI 17.0-19.1 %, I²77.3 %, n = 110) and early thoracic radiotherapy (thoracic radiotherapy 18.4 months (95 %CI 17.3-19.5, I²78.4 %, n = 100)) vs no radiotherapy 11.7 months (95 %CI 9.1-14.3, n = 10), prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI 19.7 months vs No PCI 13.0 months (95 %CI 18.5-21.0, I²75.7 %, n = 78 and 95 %CI 10.5-16.6, I²81.1 %, n = 15 respectively)) and better performance status (PS0-1 22.5 months vs PS0-4 15.3 months (95 %CI 18.7-26.1, I²72.4 %, n = 11 and 95 %CI 11.5-19.1 I²77.9 %, n = 13)) augmented this. For ED-SCLC the median survival was 9.6 months (95 %CI 8.9-10.3 %, I²95.2 %, n = 103) and this improved when irinotecan + cisplatin was used, however studies that used this combination were mostly conducted in Asian populations where survival was better. Survival was not improved with the addition of thoracic radiotherapy or PCI. Survival for both stages of cancer was better in modern studies and Asian cohorts. It was poorer for studies administering carboplatin + etoposide but this regimen was used in studies that had fewer patient selection criteria.

CONCLUSION

Early thoracic radiotherapy and PCI should be offered to people with LD-SCLC in accordance with guideline recommendations. The benefit of the aforementioned therapies to treat ED-SCLC and the use of chemotherapy in people with poor PS is less clear.

Carboplatin and Etoposide With or Without Palifosfamide in Untreated Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter, Adaptive, Randomized Phase III Study (MATISSE)

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of the addition of palifosfamide to carboplatin and etoposide in extensive stage (ES) small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Patients and Methods MATISSE was a randomized, open-label, adaptive phase III study. Previously untreated patients with ES SCLC were randomly assigned in a 1:1 fashion to receive carboplatin at area under the serum concentration-time curve 5 on day 1 plus etoposide 100 mg/m² per day on days 1 to 3 every 21 days (CE) or carboplatin at area under the serum concentration-time curve 4 on day 1 plus etoposide 100 mg/m² per day plus palifosfamide 130 mg/m² per day on days 1 to 3 every 21 days (PaCE). The primary end point was overall survival. Results In all, 188 patients were enrolled; 94 patients received CE and 94 patients received PaCE. The median age on both arms was 61 years. Six cycles of chemotherapy were completed on both arms of the study by approximately 50% of the patients. Serious adverse events were documented and did not differ significantly between patients receiving PaCE and those receiving CE. Median overall survival was similar between both arms with 10.03 months on PaCE and 10.37 months on CE ( P = .096). Conclusion The addition of palifosfamide to CE failed to improve survival in ES SCLC.

Management of Small Cell Lung Cancer: Progress and Updates

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains a major public health problem and accounts for 10% to 15% of all lung cancers. It has unique clinical features such as rapid growth, early metastatic spread, and widespread dissemination. A platinum-etoposide combination is the backbone treatment of SCLC; addition of thoracic and prophylactic cranial irradiation has been shown to improve outcome in limited-stage SCLC and in subgroups of extensive-stage SCLC. Over the last decade, significant progress has been made in characterizing the SCLC tumor biology and its developmental pathways. Most recently, efforts have focused not only on molecular targets, but also on the development of novel drugs targeting tumor evolution and immune escape mechanisms; these approaches are promising and offer opportunities that may finally improve the outcomes of SCLC.

Efficacy and safety of ifosfamide in combination with carboplatin and etoposide in small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Ifosfamide, a potent alkylating agent, is rarely incorporated into small cell lung cancer (SCLC) treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of ifosfamide in combination with carboplatin and etoposide (ICE) in previously untreated patients with SCLC.

METHODS

From January 2002 to January 2014, we consecutively enrolled 69 patients with SCLC who were treated with ICE as initial chemotherapy at Kangbuk Samsung Hospital. The modified ICE regimen consists of ifosfamide 1200 mg/m(2)/day on days 1, 2, and 3 with mesna, etoposide 80 mg/m(2)/day on days 1, 2, and 3, and carboplatin AUC 6 on day 1. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks and continued for up to nine cycles. Response assessments were performed every three cycles with computed tomography.

RESULTS

Among 69 patients with SCLC, the median age was 69 years (range 51-88 years). Sixteen (23 %) patients had limited disease (LD), and 53 (77 %) had extensive disease (ED). The overall response rate was 73 %. Stable disease rate was 20 %. The median overall survival was 11.3 months [95 % confidence interval (CI) 8.9-14.1] in the overall population, 20.6 months (95 % CI 14.2-21.2) for LD and 9.1 months (95 % CI 7.8-11.6) for ED. The median number of administered cycles was 6 (range 1-9). Grade ≥3 hematological toxicities included neutropenia (34 %), anemia (59 %), and thrombocytopenia (31 %). Grade ≥3 non-hematological toxicities included peripheral neuropathy in 2 %.

CONCLUSION

In chemonaïve patients with SCLC, modified ICE is well tolerated and shows favorable efficacy.

Pei regimen: a therapeutic option in small cell lung cancer? A retrospective monoinstitutional analysis of 46 consecutive cases

OBJECTIVES

Combination chemotherapy is very active in small cell lung cancer (SCLC), although no improvement in overall survival (OS) has been done in the last 25 years, with Cisplatin-Etoposide (PE) still considered the world-wide standard, with an average median survival of about 7-8 months in patients with extended disease (ED). In 1995, a randomized trial of the Hoosier Group in 171 ED patients showed a significant advantage in overall survival in patients treated with PEI (Cisplatin, Etoposide and Ifosfamide), compared to PE. Despite that, PEI regimen has not become a commonly used regimen in SCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Here we present a retrospective analysis of 46 consecutive patients (30 males and 16 females) with SCLC that were treated at our Institution with PEI regimen: Cisplatin 20 mg/m2, Etoposide 75 mg/m2 and Ifosfamide 1200 mg/m2, day 1 to 4, every 3 weeks. Patients received a total of 219 cycles of chemotherapy, with a mean of 4,7 cycles per patient. Median age was 63 (range 59-70); performance status (PS) was 0 in 29 patients (63%), 1 in 13 patients (28%) and 2 in 4 patients (9%).

RESULTS

In 19 limited disease (LD) patients partial response (PR) rate was 74%, and complete response (CR) was 16%. In 27 ED patients we observed 63% of PR and 26% of CR. Median time to progression (TTP) was 15.2 months in LD and 7.1 months in ED with median overall survival (OS) of 28.2 and 11.8 months, respectively. Toxicity was manageable, with a high dose intensity.

CONCLUSIONS

PEI regimen, in our opinion, may be a possible therapeutic option, with high activity and an acceptable toxicity profile.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02324296 .

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD THAT APPROVED THE STUDY

Institutional review board of Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliera S.Maria Nuova/IRCCS.

Chemotherapy of lung cancer: A global perspective of the role of ifosfamide

The oxazaphosphorine cytostatic ifosfamide (IFO) has been successfully integrated in the treatment of various hematological and solid tumors. The purpose of this review is to summarize the evidence for its use in lung cancer starting from basic data of preclinical studies followed by a global summary of the phase III and seminal phase II clinical studies. Global in double respect: first covering both the small cell as well as the non-small cell indications, and, second tracing those studies performed in Europe and the United States as well as those from Asian countries.

Medical management of lung cancer: Experience in China

Lung cancer is the leading cause of death from cancer worldwide, as well as in China. A multidisciplinary treatment strategy for lung cancer, which includes medical and radiation oncology, surgery, and pathology is used in clinical practice in China. Chinese lung cancer patients are treated according to different pathologic and genetic types of the disease. For those with active epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are used in first-, second- or third-line and maintenance treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). For patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangement, Crizotinib is a promising treatment in advanced NSCLC patients. A platinum-based regimen remains the mainstay of first-line systemic therapy for advanced NSCLC patients who are negative for EGFR mutation or ALK gene rearrangement. For patients with non-squamous NSCLC, Pemetrexed plus Cisplatin is recommended in first-line systemic therapy. An Endostatin combination with chemotherapy is used in first- and second-line advanced NSCLC patients. S-1 presents a new option of chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC cases. Cisplatin-based doublet chemotherapy is commonly used in NSCLC patients after surgery as adjuvant therapy. EGFR-TKIs are now being assessed in the adjuvant setting. The standard first-line chemotherapy regimen of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is platinum with Etoposide (PE). Amrubicin provides similar survival compared with the PE regimen with an acceptable toxicity profile in extensive stage SCLC patients. Supportive care, such as traditional Chinese medicine and pegylated filgrastim, play an important role in improving patients' quality of life.

Benefit from ifosfamide treatment in small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis

This study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of ifosfamide plus etoposide plus platinum (IEP) to that of etoposide plus platinum (EP) in patients with previously untreated small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). The Cochrane Library, Embase, MEDLINE and Chinese Biomedical Literature databases were searched to identify all randomized controlled trials comparing IEP to EP in patients with histologically proven SCLC. Two investigators independently assessed the quality of the relevant trials and extracted data. We analyzed the data using Review Manager software, version 4.2.8. A total of 4 trials with 447 previously untreated SCLC patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis indicated that there were no significant differences in the overall response [relative risk (RR) = 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.97-1.19], 1-year survival rate (RR=1.22, 95% CI: 0.96-1.55) and 2-year survival rate (RR=1.52, 95% CI: 0.75-3.07) between the IEP and EP regimens. However, there were significant differences between the IEP and EP regimens regarding the incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia (RR=1.52, 95% CI: 1.07-2.17) and grade 3/4 vomiting (RR=1.78, 95% CI: 1.02-3.11). In conclusion, our results suggested that IEP is not superior to EP regimen for the treatment of previously untreated SCLC, whereas the IEP regimen is associated with more severe hematological and gastrointestinal toxicities compared to EP. Therefore, the use of ifosfamide in multimodality treatment regimens requires further investigation.

Treatment of small cell lung cancer

Treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains a significant challenge for the oncologists. Attempts to improve the results of first-line treatment have all failed so far and no real progress has been made in last years, emphasizing the need for novel strategies of treatment and the development of validated biomarkers. Patients with limited disease and good performance status should be considered for concomitant chemoradiotherapy, followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation. Patients with extensive disease should be treated with a platinum-based chemotherapy (cisplatin or carboplatin); chest radiotherapy can be considered in patients achieving extra-thoracic complete response and prophylactic cranial irradiation is recommended for patients responsive to initial chemotherapy. A large number of molecular-targeted drugs and immunomodulators are currently in clinical development: however, only a better understanding of molecular biology of SCLC and the identification of molecular markers predictive of response to targeted agents will lead to advances in the treatment of SCLC.

Lorvotuzumab mertansine, a CD56-targeting antibody-drug conjugate with potent antitumor activity against small cell lung cancer in human xenograft models

Lorvotuzumab mertansine (LM) is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of a humanized anti-CD56 antibody, lorvotuzumab, linked via a cleavable disulfide linker to the tubulin-binding maytansinoid DM1. CD56 is expressed on most small cell lung cancers (SCLC), providing a promising therapeutic target for treatment of this aggressive cancer, which has a poor five-year survival rate of only 5-10%. We performed immunohistochemical staining on SCLC tumor microarrays, which confirmed that CD56 is expressed at high levels on most (~74%) SCLC tumors. Conjugation of lorvotuzumab with DM1 did not alter its specific binding to cells and LM demonstrated potent target-dependent cytotoxicity against CD56-positive SCLC cells in vitro. The anti-tumor activity of LM was evaluated against SCLC xenograft models in mice, both as monotherapy and in combination with platinum/etoposide and paclitaxel/carboplatin. Dose-dependent and antigen-specific anti-tumor activity of LM monotherapy was demonstrated at doses as low as 3 mg/kg. LM was highly active in combination with standard-of-care platinum/etoposide therapies, even in relatively resistant xenograft models. LM demonstrated outstanding anti-tumor activity in combination with carboplatin/etoposide, with superior activity over chemotherapy alone when LM was used in combinations at significantly reduced doses (6-fold below the minimally efficacious dose for LM monotherapy). The combination of LM with carboplatin/paclitaxel was also highly active. This study provides the rationale for clinical evaluation of LM as a promising novel targeted therapy for SCLC, both as monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy.

Medical treatment of small cell lung cancer: state of the art and new development

INTRODUCTION

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a rapidly progressive disease that accounts for approximately 15% of all lung cancers. Chemotherapy remains the cornerstone of treatment of SCLC, but in the last two decades, its progress has reached a plateau. Although a significant sensitivity to chemotherapy and radiotherapy is a feature of SCLC, an early development of drug resistance unavoidable occurs during the course of the disease. Second-line treatment for relapsed patients remains a very challenging setting, with a limited clinical benefit.

AREAS COVERED

A thorough analysis of various therapeutic strategies reported in literature for SCLC treatment was performed. This review includes novel therapeutic approaches such as maintenance or consolidation treatments, new chemotherapy agents and targeted therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

Against this background, there is a desperate need for the development of novel active drugs. Among these, amrubicin has also shown more favourable antitumor activity, and is the most promising at present. Concerning targeted agents, these have failed to demonstrate effectiveness for SCLC and a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms is clearly needed. In the future, further investigations are required to clarify the role of novel anti-angiogenic or pro-apoptotic agents and hedgehog pathway inhibitors.

Small cell lung cancer

Neuroendocrine tumors account for approximately 20% of lung cancers; most (≈15%) are small cell lung cancer (SCLC). These NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for SCLC focus on extensive-stage SCLC because it occurs more frequently than limited-stage disease. SCLC is highly sensitive to initial therapy; however, most patients eventually die of recurrent disease. In patients with extensive-stage disease, chemotherapy alone can palliate symptoms and prolong survival in most patients; however, long-term survival is rare. Most cases of SCLC are attributable to cigarette smoking; therefore, smoking cessation should be strongly promoted.

Cisplatin plus etoposide versus other platin-based regimens for patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised, controlled trials

AIM

To determine whether the cisplatin plus etoposide (EP) combination was more efficacious and less toxic than other platinum-based regimens for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

We performed an extensive literature search (from their inception to July 2010). Two reviewers independently assessed search results and methodological quality of included studies. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and relative risks (RRs) were calculated according to a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Twelve randomised, controlled trials involving seven different platinum-based chemotherapy regimens were included into this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that compared with EP regimen, irinotecan plus cisplatin (IP) might decrease the risk of death (HR = 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78-0.97, P = 0.01) (five trials), unlike the sensitivity analysis (HR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.81-1.02, P = 0.12), progression-free survival (HR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.86-1.05, P = 0.28) and overall response rate (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.93-1.24) that were not superior for IP. IP regimen produced more non-haematological toxicities and less haematological toxicities. One trial found that etoposide + cisplatin + epirubicin + cyclophosphamide and cisplatin + etoposide + ifosfamide regimen might prolong the overall survival respectively. Etoposide + cisplatin + epirubicin + cyclophosphamide regimen also might improve progression-free survival but with high rate of haematological toxicities. None of the other trials included in the study demonstrated a significant improvement in survival.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no strong evidence that any clinical advantage for extensive small-cell lung carcinoma patients requiring chemotherapy when comparing EP with other platin-based regimens, with exception of IP that might prolong overall survival. The decision to prescribe which chemotherapy should take into consideration both cost and treatment preference.

Combination of three cytotoxic agents in small-cell lung cancer

Purpose

The established treatment for small-cell lung cancer has been a cisplatin–etoposide combination, as the most effective chemotherapy regimen. Paclitaxel has also been used in combination with cisplatin and etoposide but this has been unacceptable due to the toxicity. This toxicity could be attributed to the three consequent days of treatment with etoposide plus the doses of each of the three drugs. Our objectives were to determine an equal or longer survival and lower toxicity by administering all 3 drugs with low dosage on day one, compared to the established guideline of 3-day administration.

Methods

We tested the aforementioned three-drug combination and avoided the toxicity in the majority of patients by administering all 3 drugs on day one. Fifty-one patients (50 evaluable) were recruited from 4 oncology clinics. All patients had histologically or cytologically confirmed small-cell lung cancer with limited and extensive disease in 40 and 60 % of the patients, respectively. The treatment was: cisplatin 75 mg/m², etoposide 120 mg/m² (maximum 200 mg), and paclitaxel 135 mg/m². The agents were administered on day one and repeated every 3 weeks for 6 cycles.

Results

The median survival was 15 months (95 % CI 13.6–16.4) (mean 16 months). Forty-five (90 %) patients achieved a response: 20 (40 %) patients, a complete response and 25 (50 %), a partial response. Adverse reactions included grade 3 and 4 neutropenia in 12 and 2 % of the patients, respectively. Other side effects were of very low toxicity.

Conclusion

The 1-day, three-agent (cisplatin–etoposide–paclitaxel) treatment of small-cell lung cancer is beneficial with respect to response rate and survival, and the toxicity is low and well-tolerated.

Chemotherapy for brain metastases from small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 20% of all cases of lung cancer. It tends to disseminate early in the course of its natural history and to grow quickly. Approximately 10% to 18% of patients present with brain metastases (BM) at the time of initial diagnosis, and an additional 40% to 50% will develop BM some time during the course of their disease.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness and toxicity of systemic chemotherapy for the treatment of BM from SCLC.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Lung Cancer Review Group Specialised Register (July 2011), CENTRAL (2011, Issue 5), PubMed (1966 to July 2011), EMBASE (2005 to July 2011), LILACS (1982 to July 2011) and the International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (ICTRP).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing systemic chemotherapy (single agent or combination chemotherapy) with another chemotherapy regimen, palliative care, whole brain radiotherapy or any combination of these interventions for the treatment of BM as the only site of progression.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data extraction and 'Risk of bias' assessment were carried out independently by two review authors. As the included studies evaluated three different treatment modalities meta-analysis was not possible.

MAIN RESULTS

Three RCTs, involving 192 participants, met inclusion criteria for this review. No significant differences for overall survival (OS) were reported in any of the trials: in the first trial, 33 patients received whole brain radiation therapy and no significant difference was found between patients treated with topotecan and those not treated with topotecan. In a second trial, in which 120 patients were randomized to receive teniposide with or without brain radiation therapy, the authors reported that the median progression-free survival (brain-specific progression-free survival (PFS)) was 3.5 months in the combined modality arm and 3.2 in the teniposide alone arm. In a third trial, comparing sequential and concomitant chemoradiotherapy (teniposide plus cisplatin) in 39 participants, the survival difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. While the first trial reported no significant difference in PFS, the second RCT found a significant difference favoring combined therapy group. The second trial also found that patients receiving chemoradiotherapy (teniposide plus whole brain radiotherapy) had a higher complete response rate than those receiving only the topoisomerase inhibitor.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Given the paucity of robust studies assessing the clinical effects of treatments, available evidence is insufficient to judge the effectiveness and safety of chemotherapy for the treatment of BM from SCLC. Published studies are insufficient to address the objectives of this review. According to the available evidence included in this review, chemotherapy does not improve specific brain PFS and OS in patients with SCLC. The combined treatment of teniposide and brain radiation therapy contributed to outcome in terms of increased complete remission and shorter time to progression (though not OS).

Chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer: a comprehensive review

Combination chemotherapy is the current strategy of choice for treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Platinum containing combination regimens are superior to non-platinum regimens in limited stage-SCLC and possibly also in extensive stage-SCLC as first and second-line treatments. The addition of ifosfamide to platinum containing regimens may improve the outcome but at the price of increased toxicity. Suboptimal doses of chemotherapy result in inferior survival. Early intensified, accelerated and high-dose chemotherapy gave conflicting results and is not considered a standard option outside of clinical trials. A number of newer agents have provided promising results when used in combination regimens, for example, gemcitabine, irinotecan and topotecan. However, more studies are required to appropriately evaluate them. There is a definitive role for radiotherapy in LD-SCLC. However, timing and schedule are subject to further research. Novel approaches are currently being investigated in the hope of improving outcome.

Small cell lung cancer: new clinical recommendations and current status of biomarker assessment

Small-cell lung carcinomas (SCLC) represent 15-18% of all lung cancers. As SCLC has a high propensity for early metastatic dissemination, less than a third of patients have limited disease (T0-1N0-3M0). The new TNM classification should now be used also for SCLC. Platin- and etoposide-based chemotherapy is the cornerstone treatment. Response rates to both chemotherapy and radiotherapy are impressive but relapses are frequent. The current state-of-the-art treatment for MO patients involves platin-etoposide-based chemotherapy, combined with early thoracic radiotherapy. Because of the high risk of brain metastases, prophylactic cranial irradiation is indicated in responders and should be part of the standard management. The 5-year survival rate may reach 25% in MO patients, but does not exceed 10% at 2 years in metastatic patients. Most patients relapse within the first two years, and there are few treatment options in second line as opposed to NSCLC. Many issues are subject for further clinical research such as the biology of this disease to better identify pathways that could be targeted with new drugs, optimisation of systemic treatments and radiotherapy. Pursuing clinical trials at all stages constitutes a challenge for thoracic researchers and oncologists.

Current management of small cell lung cancer

Confined to one side of the chest, limited stage small cell lung cancer is treated with a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, yet has a long-term survival rate of only 15%. Extensive stage disease has initial response rates to chemotherapy exceeding 70%. However, the disease almost invariably progresses and becomes fatal. Many recent clinical trials have failed to show superiority of newer chemotherapeutics or targeted therapies compared with the standard chemotherapy backbone of platinum plus etoposide. Numerous promising targeted therapies and other agents are still in development.

Thoracic radiation therapy improves the overall survival of patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer with distant metastasis

BACKGROUND

The authors conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the effects of thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC).

METHODS

Between January 2003 and December 2006, the records of 119 patients who were diagnosed with ED-SCLC (all with distant metastasis [M1]) were included in the study. Sixty patients received chemotherapy (ChT) and TRT (ChT/TRT), and 59 patients received ChT alone. The ChT regimens consisted of either carboplatin and etoposide (CE) or cisplatin and etoposide (PE). The total dose of TRT ranged from 40 to 60 grays (Gy) at 1.8 to 2.0 Gy per fraction.

RESULTS

For the entire group, the median survival was 13 months, and the 2-year and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 26.1% and 6.5%, respectively. The median survival and the 2-year and 5-year OS rates were 17 months, 35%, and 7.1%, respectively, in the ChT/TRT group and 9.3 months, 17%, and 5.1%, respectively, in the ChT group (P = .014). However, this improvement was achieved at the expense of low toxicity. Multivariate analysis revealed that receiving ≥4 cycles of ChT (P = .032) and TRT (P = .005) were favorable prognostic factors for OS. Of all toxicities, only high-grade leucopenia (grade >3) was more frequent in the ChT/TRT group.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of TRT to ChT improved the OS of patients with ED-SCLC. Furthermore, receiving ≥4 cycles of ChT and TRT were independent, favorable prognostic factors for OS.

Extensive disease small cell lung cancer dose-response relationships: implications for resistance mechanisms

BACKGROUND

Some studies (but not others) suggested that high doses are beneficial in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). We hypothesized that dose-response curve (DRC) shape reflects resistance mechanisms.

METHODS

We reviewed published SCLC clinical trials and converted response rates into estimated mean tumor cell kill, assuming killing is proportional to reduction in tumor volume. Mean % cell survival was plotted versus planned dose intensity. Nonlinear and linear meta-regression analyses (weighted according to the number of patients in each study) were used to assess DRC characteristics.

RESULTS

Although associations between dose and cell survival were not statistically significant, DRCs sloped downward for five of seven agents across all doses and for all seven when lowest doses were excluded. Maximum mean cell kill across all drugs and doses was approximately 90%, suggesting that there may be a maximum achievable tumor cell kill irrespective of number of agents or drug doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Downward DRC slopes suggest that maintaining relatively high doses may possibly maximize palliation, although the associations between dose and slope did not achieve statistical significance, and slopes for most drugs tended to be shallow. DRC flattening at higher doses would preclude cure and would suggest that "saturable passive resistance" (deficiency of factors required for cell killing) limits maximum achievable cell kill. An example of factors that could flatten the DRC at higher doses and lead to saturable passive resistance would be presence of quiescent, noncycling cells.

Therapy of small cell lung cancer with emphasis on oral topotecan

Systemic chemotherapy plays the major role in the management of patients with small cell lung cancer. Cisplatin plus etoposide is the most widely used regimen and is considered as standard in patients with limited disease. Cisplatin plus irinotecan improved survival compared to cisplatin plus etoposide in a Japanese trial but failed to do so in two trials in Caucasians. Cisplatin plus topotecan had similar efficacy compared to cisplatin plus etoposide in patients with extensive disease. In the second-line setting, topotecan showed similar efficacy but better tolerability compared to cyclophosphamide, doxorubin plus vincristine. Oral topotecan was as efficacious as its intravenous formulation and was shown to improve survival compared to best supportive care alone in patients previously treated with chemotherapy. Thus topotecan is considered as the standard second-line chemotherapy in patients with small cell lung cancer.

A phase II study of carboplatin, etoposide, and exisulind in patients with extensive small cell lung cancer: CALGB 30104

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy and toxicity of carboplatin, etoposide, and exisulind as initial therapy for extensive stage small cell lung cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The Cancer and Leukemia Group B conducted a phase II study of carboplatin (area under the curve 6) day 1 and etoposide 80 mg/m(2) days 1-3 administered intravenously every 21 days with exisulind 250 mg orally twice daily in 44 evaluable patients with previously untreated extensive stage small cell lung cancer. The hypothesis was the addition of a novel cytostatic agent to standard therapy may increase survival time. The primary end point of the study was to evaluate overall survival. The secondary end points were to characterize response rates and toxicity.

RESULTS

The majority of the patients were male (64%), Caucasian (95%), and had performance status 0 or 1 (77%). The median age was 61 (range 44-82) years. The percentage of patients alive at 1 year was 36.4% (95% [confidence interval] CI: 24.6-53.8%). The median overall survival was 10.6 months (95% CI: 9.1-14.7). The best overall response rate was 77% (95% CI: 62-89%) with 16% of the patients achieving complete response. The most frequent grade 3 or grade 4 hematological toxicities were neutropenia (64%), thrombocytopenia (36%), and febrile neutropenia (16%). The most common grade 3 or grade 4 nonhematological toxicities were gastrointestinal (30%) and electrolyte changes (23%).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of exisulind to a standard regimen of carboplatin and etoposide did not improve outcomes compared with historic controls treated with chemotherapy alone. Further evaluation of this regimen in small cell lung cancer is not warranted.

An original administration of ifosfamide given once every other week: a clinical and pharmacological study

Ifosfamide (IFOS) is a bifunctional alkylator with a wide spectrum of activity in solid tumors and has an autoinductive liver metabolism through P450 cytochromes. Autoinduction might permit a better therapeutic index for combination therapy. A phase I trial was investigated with interpatient dose escalation of a single dose of IFOS given every 2 weeks in advanced solid tumor patients. IFOS, its dechloroethylated and active 4-hydroxy metabolites, were measured at cycles 1 and 2 at the end of infusion, 2 and 5 h later, using gas chromatography. IFOS elimination was considered as following monocompartimental model kinetics. The results of 20 patients from January 2004 to June 2006 were included. The median of previous chemotherapies was 2 (0-5). The primary tumor was most often ovarian (5), peritoneal (3), sarcoma (2), melanoma (2) or miscellaneous (8). Ten patients received 2.5 g/m2 and the other 10 patients received 3 g/m2. A total of 79 cycles were evaluable for toxicity. The median number of cycles was 4 (1-8). No grade 3-4 toxicity, no alopecia at first dose level and no toxicity-related fatal events were noted. One objective response was noted in a pancreatic cancer patient and one sustained CA125 decline in a heavily pretreated ovarian cancer patient. A slight (7-10%) but reproducible decrease of areas under the curve was detectable at cycle 2, at both dose levels, related to autoinductive metabolism. Intraindividual variations (large SD) were noticed for each pharmacokinetic parameter. A patient-dependent autoinduction of IFOS metabolism was detected rather than a slight nondose-dependent autoinduction. The toxicity profile allows the development of bi-weekly IFOS-based combination therapies.

[Small cell lung cancer]

With about 20% of all lung cancers small cell lung cancer (SCLC) represents a major subset of this entity. Although therapeutic improvements did not receive as much attention as in non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), many small steps of clinical progress have been achieved within the last 20 years. An optimal treatment should be based on an interdisciplinary treatment plan. The standard treatment in localized stages represents combined radiation and chemotherapy. Cisplatin and etoposide are in this concern considered as a gold standard. 3D-planned conformal radiotherapy should start as early as possible and should be applied concomitantly to chemotherapy and in certain cases even in a hyperfractionated treatment protocol. In very early stages surgical resection could be an option in selected cases. In advanced stages a platinum-based doublet offers high response rates. As already established in limited disease prophylactic cranial irradiation is now also indicated in extensive disease in case of any tumor remission. In the second line treatment and in patients with reduced performance status topotecan is recommended. Similar as in NSCLC pemetrexed might become an alternative treatment option in the second line setting. In the field of new targeted therapies bevacizumab achieved the most promising results. The present review highlights historical milestones and up-to-date trends in radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgery. Furthermore, the role of experimental strategies and the management of certain special clinical situations are discussed.

A threefold dose intensity treatment with ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide for patients with small cell lung cancer: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

The dose intensity of chemotherapy can be increased to the highest possible level by early administration of multiple and sequential high-dose cycles supported by transfusion with peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs). A randomized trial was performed to test the impact of such dose intensification on the long-term survival of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

METHODS

Patients who had limited or extensive SCLC with no more than two metastatic sites were randomly assigned to high-dose (High, n = 69) or standard-dose (Std, n = 71) chemotherapy with ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE). High-ICE cycles were supported by transfusion with PBPCs that were collected after two cycles of treatment with epidoxorubicin at 150 mg/m(2), paclitaxel at 175 mg/m(2), and filgrastim. The primary outcome was 3-year survival. Comparisons between response rates and toxic effects within subgroups (limited or extensive disease, liver metastases or no liver metastases, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, normal or abnormal lactate dehydrogenase levels) were also performed.

RESULTS

Median relative dose intensity in the High-ICE arm was 293% (range = 174%-392%) of that in the Std-ICE arm. The 3-year survival rates were 18% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 10% to 29%) and 19% (95% CI = 11% to 30%) in the High-ICE and Std-ICE arms, respectively. No differences were observed between the High-ICE and Std-ICE arms in overall response (n = 54 [78%, 95% CI = 67% to 87%] and n = 48 [68%, 95% CI = 55% to 78%], respectively) or complete response (n = 27 [39%, 95% CI = 28% to 52%] and n = 24 [34%, 95% CI = 23% to 46%], respectively). Subgroup analyses showed no benefit for any outcome from High-ICE treatment. Hematologic toxicity was substantial in the Std-ICE arm (grade > or = 3 neutropenia, n = 49 [70%]; anemia, n = 17 [25%]; thrombopenia, n = 17 [25%]), and three patients (4%) died from toxicity. High-ICE treatment was predictably associated with severe myelosuppression, and five patients (8%) died from toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term outcome of SCLC was not improved by raising the dose intensity of ICE chemotherapy by threefold.

Randomised phase II trial of irinotecan plus cisplatin vs irinotecan, cisplatin plus etoposide repeated every 3 weeks in patients with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer

Patients with previously untreated extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer were treated with irinotecan 60 mg m(-2) on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 60 mg m(-2) on day 1 with (n=55) or without (n=54) etoposide 50 mg m(-2) on days 1-3 with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support repeated every 3 weeks for four cycles. The triplet regimen was too toxic to be considered for further studies.

[Updated strategies in Small Cell Lung Cancer post ASCO 2007]

Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) is associated with intensive nicotine consumption and characterized by a very aggressive growth rate. Furthermore, metastases often appear very early. At the annual meeting of the "American Society of Clinical Oncology" (ASCO) 2007, recent issues which will influence the daily clinical practice were presented. New chemotherapy combinations such as carboplatin/irinotecan or pemetrexed as well as targeted therapies e.g. bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy could extend our therapeutic options. A genetic polymorphism, which influences the pharmacokinetic of irinotecan, turned out to be one reason for the different outcome of an irinotecan/cisplatin therapy in a Japanese and Northern American population. In the field of radiotherapy, a phase III study showed for the first time a significant benefit in overall survival by prophylactic cranial radiation in the setting of extensive disease.

Small cell lung cancer: have we made any progress over the last 25 years?

Twenty-five years ago, small cell lung cancer was widely considered to be the next cancer added to the list of "curable cancers." This article attempts to summarize the progress made toward that goal since then. Clinical trials have provided landmarks in the therapy of limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). These are: (a) the proof that thoracic radiation therapy adds to systemic chemotherapy, (b) the superiority of twice-daily radiation therapy over daily fractionation, and (c) the need for prophylactic central nervous system radiation (prophylactic cranial irradiation). Each of these innovations adds about 5%-10% to the overall survival rate. In extensive-stage disease, irinotecan plus cisplatin may be a possible alternative to the "standard" etoposide-cisplatin chemotherapy doublet, but there has been little progress otherwise. It is imperative that, whenever possible, patients be given the opportunity to participate in future clinical trials so that the survival for these patients can continue to improve.

Could we expect to improve survival in small cell lung cancer?

Despite the very good response rate of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) to many anti-cancer agents, survival remains disappointing, particularly in extensive-stage (ES) disease. Many potentially beneficial regimens have achieved a median survival of less than 12 months in clinical trials, and so the standard regimen has remained cisplatin plus etoposide. Trials have shown that 3- and 4-drug regimens are no better than 2-drug regimens; alternating agents, dose-dense and high-dose regimens do not improve outcome, and non-platinum-based regimens are not superior to platinum-based regimens. A recent phase II trial demonstrated that pemetrexed/platinum-based doublets are active in ES-SCLC in the first-line setting. In combination with cisplatin or carboplatin, pemetrexed demonstrated a favourable toxicity profile. The ease of administration and convenient schedule of pemetrexed make these regimens attractive. Although further follow-up of patients in this trial is necessary to define response durability and survival, results so far have led to the initiation of phase III trials of pemetrexed-based regimens in ES-SCLC.