High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous bone marrow transplantation versus dexamethasone, cisplatin, and cytarabine in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with partial response to front-line chemotherapy: a prospective randomized italian multicenter study

Favorable Event Free-Survival of High-Dose Chemotherapy Followed by Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Higher Risk Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in First Complete Remission

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has been applied to patients with diffuse large Bcell lymphoma (DLBCL); it is well established that ASCT shows significant survival benefits for chemosensitive relapse. However, half of relapsed patients are resistant to salvage chemotherapy, indicating that they are not suitable for ASCT. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical records of 47 patients with DLBCL classified as high or high-intermediate (higher) risk, according to the International Prognostic Index, who underwent upfront ASCT in first complete remission (CR1). Compared with 10 patients with similar characteristics who did not receive ASCT, event free survival at 5-year was significantly superior in ASCT group. Toxicity of ASCT was acceptable and therapy-related death was not observed. We therefore propose that upfront ASCT for higher risk DLBCL in CR1 might provide survival benefit, probably because the high-dose therapy removes minimally resided tumor.

Prognosis of patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma not reaching complete response or relapsing after frontline chemotherapy or immunochemotherapy

A retrospective study was performed to assess the outcome of patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who did not achieve complete response or who relapsed before and after the use of rituximab. Clinical features and outcome of 816 (425 M/391 F; median age 63 years) patients diagnosed from 1991 to 2001 (pre-rituximab era, N = 348) and from 2002 to 2012 (rituximab era, N = 468) in a single institution were evaluated. Five hundred fifty-three patients achieved complete remission (CR), 57 partial response (PR), and 206 were refractory with a median overall survival of 15, 1.5, and 0.4 years, respectively. Patients receiving rituximab had lower risk of refractoriness or relapse. In primarily refractory and PR patients, there was not a difference in survival depending on whether patients received or not rituximab-containing frontline treatment. Early death rate was 11%, including 3.6% due to infectious complications. Rituximab did not modify these figures. In the relapse setting, 5-year survival from relapse was 25% for patients who never received rituximab, 54% for those who received rituximab only at relapse, and 48% for those treated with immunochemotherapy both as frontline and at relapse. In conclusion, relapsed/refractory patients with DLBCL show poor prognosis despite the use of frontline immunochemotherapy. New therapeutic approaches are needed in this group of patients.

Phase I-II clinical trial of oxaliplatin, fludarabine, cytarabine, and rituximab therapy in aggressive relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia or Richter syndrome

BACKGROUND

To improve outcomes of patients with Richter syndrome (RS) and relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), we modified the OFAR1 regimen (oxaliplatin and cytarabine doses of the oxaliplatin, fludarabine, cytarabine, and rituximab) for this phase I-II study (OFAR2).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

OFAR2 consisted of oxaliplatin at 30 mg/m(2) on days 1 to 4, fludarabine at 30 mg/m(2), cytarabine at 0.5 g/m(2), rituximab at 375 mg/m(2) on day 3, and pegfilgrastim at 6 mg on day 6. Fludarabine and cytarabine were given on days 2 and 3 (cohort 1), days 2 to 4 (cohort 2), or days 2 to 5 (cohort 3) every 4 weeks. Phase II followed the "3 + 3" design of phase I.

RESULTS

The 102 patients (CLL, 67; RS, 35) treated had heavily pretreated high-risk disease. Twelve patients were treated in phase I; cohort 2 was the phase II recommended dose. The most common toxicities were hematologic. Response rates (phase II) were 38.7% for RS (complete response [CR], 6.5%) and 50.8% for relapsed/refractory CLL (CR, 4.6%). The median survival durations were 6.6 (RS) and 20.6 (CLL) months. Among 9 patients who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) as post-remission therapy, none has died (median follow-up, 15.9 months).

CONCLUSION

OFAR2 had significant antileukemic activity in RS and relapsed/refractory CLL. Patients undergoing SCT as post-remission therapy had favorable outcomes.

Salvage chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant in primary refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: outcomes and prognostic factors

Patients with primary refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (REF DLBCL: progression on or within 3 months of completion of primary therapy) sensitive to salvage chemotherapy undergo autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). We conducted a retrospective review of 111 patients with REF DLBCL treated between 1999 and 2007. Primary treatment consisted of cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP; 66%) and rituximab with CHOP (R-CHOP; 33%); 14% received involved field radiation. The response rate (RR) to first salvage chemotherapy was 23% (RR by regimen: dexamethasone, cytosine arabinoside and cisplatin [DHAP] 15%, etoposide, Solu-Medrol, cytosine arabinoside and cisplatin [ESHAP] 36%, and gemcitabine, dexamethasone and cisplatin [GDP] 45%); 25% (n = 28) of patients underwent ASCT. With a median follow-up of 5.9 months (range 1-94), the median progression-free and overall survival from primary treatment failure was 3 and 10 months, respectively. Outcomes in patients with REF DLBCL after CHOP or R-CHOP appear equally poor. Second-generation platinum-containing regimens (ESHAP, GDP) may be superior to DHAP in this setting. Novel, prospectively evaluated treatment approaches should be pursued in REF DLBCL.

The role of autologous stem cell transplantation in the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (DLBCL) accounting for approximately 30% of new lymphoma diagnoses in adult patients. Complete remissions (CRs) can be achieved in 45% to 55% of patients and cure in approximately 30-35% with anthracycline-containing combination chemotherapy. The ageadjusted IPI (aaIPI) has been widely employed, particularly to "tailor" more intensive therapy such as high-dose therapy (HDT) with autologous hemopoietic stem cell rescue (ASCT). IPI, however, has failed to reliably predict response to specific therapies. A subgroup of young patients with poor prognosis exists. To clarify the role of HDT/ASCT combined with rituximab in the front line therapy a longer follow-up and randomized studies are needed. The benefit of HDT/ASCT for refractory or relapsed DLBCL is restricted to patients with immunochemosensitive disease. Currently, clinical and biological research is focused to improve the curability of this setting of patients, mainly young.

High-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation versus chemotherapy or immuno-chemotherapy for follicular lymphoma in adults

BACKGROUND

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common indolent and second most common Non-Hodgkin`s lymphoma (NHL) in the Western world. Standard treatment usually includes rituximab and chemotherapy. High-dose therapy (HDT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is an option for patients in advanced stages or for second-line therapy, leading to improved progression-free survival (PFS) rates. However, the impact of HDT and ASCT remains unclear, as there are hints of an increased risk of second cancers.

OBJECTIVES

We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HDT plus ASCT with chemotherapy or immuno-chemotherapy in patients with FL with respect to overall survival (OS), PFS, treatment-related mortality (TRM), adverse events and secondary malignancies.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE as well as conference proceedings from January 1985 to September 2011 for RCTs. Two review authors independently screened search results.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing chemotherapy or immuno-chemotherapy with HDT followed by ASCT in adults with previously untreated or relapsed FL.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used hazard ratios (HR) as effect measures used for OS and PFS as well as relative risks for response rates. Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the quality of trials.

MAIN RESULTS

Our search strategies led to 3046 potentially relevant references. Of these, five RCTs involving 1093 patients were included; four trials in previously untreated patients and one trial in relapsed patients. Overall, the quality of the five trials is judged to be moderate. All trials were reported as randomised and judged to be open-label studies, because usually trials evaluating stem cell transplantation are not blinded. Due to the small number of studies in each analysis (four or less), the quantification of heterogeneity was not reliable and not evaluated in further detail. A potential source of bias are uncertainties in the HR calculation. For OS, the HR had to be calculated for three trials from survival curves, for PFS for two trials.We found a statistically significant increased PFS in previously untreated FL patients in the HDT + ASCT arm (HR = 0.42 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33 to 0.54; P < 0.00001). However, this effect is not transferred into a statistically significant OS advantage (HR = 0.97; 95% 0.76 to 1.24; P = 0.81). The subgroup of trials adding rituximab to both intervention arms (one trial) confirms these results and the trial had to be stopped early after an interim analysis due to a statistically significant PFS advantage in the HDT + ASCT arm (PFS: HR = 0.36; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.55; OS: HR = 0.88; 95% CI 0.40 to 1.92). In the four trials in previously untreated patients there are no statistically significant differences between HDT + ASCT and the control-arm in terms of TRM (RR = 1.28; 95% CI 0.25 to 6.61; P = 0.77), secondary acute myeloid leukaemia/myelodysplastic syndromes (RR = 2.87; 95% CI 0.7 to 11.75; P = 0.14) or solid cancers (RR = 1.20; 95% CI 0.25 to 5.77; P = 0.82). Adverse events were rarely reported and were observed more frequently in patients undergoing HDT + ASCT (mostly infections and haematological toxicity).For patients with relapsed FL, there is some evidence (one trial, N = 70) that HDT + ASCT is advantageous in terms of PFS and OS (PFS: HR = 0.30; 95% CI 0.15 to 0.61; OS: HR = 0.40; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.89). For this trial, no results were reported for TRM, adverse events or secondary cancers.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In summary, the currently available evidence suggests a strong PFS benefit for HDT + ASCT compared with chemotherapy or immuno-chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with FL. No statistically significant differences in terms of OS, TRM and secondary cancers were detected. These effects are confirmed in a subgroup analysis (one trial) adding rituximab to both treatment arms. Further trials evaluating this approach are needed to determine this effect more precisely in the era of rituximab. Moreover, longer follow-up data are necessary to find out whether the PFS advantage will translate into an OS advantage in previously untreated patients with FL.There is evidence that HDT + ASCT is advantageous in patients with relapsed FL.

Increased mobilization and yield of stem cells using plerixafor in combination with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor for the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma remain the most common indications for high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell rescue. While a CD34+ cell dose of 1 × 10⁶/kg is considered the minimum required for engraftment, higher CD34+ doses correlate with improved outcome. Numerous studies, however, support targeting a minimum CD34+ cell dose of 2.0 × 10⁶/kg, and an “optimal” dose of 4 to 6 × 10⁶/kg for a single transplant. Unfortunately, up to 40% of patients fail to mobilize an optimal CD34+ cell dose using myeloid growth factors alone. Plerixafor is a novel reversible inhibitor of CXCR4 that significantly increases the mobilization and collection of higher numbers of hematopoietic progenitor cells. Two randomized multi-center clinical trials in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and multiple myeloma have demonstrated that the addition of plerixafor to granulocyte-colony stimulating factor increases the mobilization and yield of CD34+ cells in fewer apheresis days, which results in durable engraftment. This review summarizes the pharmacology and evidence for the clinical efficacy of plerixafor in mobilizing hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, and discusses potential ways to utilize plerixafor in a cost-effective manner in patients with these diseases.

Oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, and oxaliplatin)±rituximab is an effective salvage regimen in patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Patients affected by relapsed or primary refractory lymphomas currently have a poor prognosis and no standard salvage treatment options. This study was carried out to assess the efficacy and safety of a dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, and oxaliplatin as salvage therapy in those patients, replacing cisplatin with oxaliplatin in the standard dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cisplatin scheme.

METHODS

Seventy patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin or Hodgkin lymphoma were treated from September 2001 to September 2007. The median age of patients was 51 years (range, 19-75 years). Histological subtypes were: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n=47) and Hodgkin lymphoma (n=23). The overall response rate was 73% (51 of 70), with 30 (43%) complete remissions and 21 (30%) partial remissions. Fifty-two patients were treated with dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, and oxaliplatin as second-line chemotherapy. Forty-eight patients were enrolled in an autologous stem cell transplantation program; forty (83%) finally proceeded to high-dose consolidation and autografting.

RESULTS

No grade 3 or 4 nonhematological toxicity was demonstrated; in particular, no renal or neurotoxicity was reported. After a median follow-up period of 21 months (range, 2-87 months), 22 (31%) patients had died. Probabilities of 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 44% and 71%, respectively. In the chemosensitive patients, the PFS and OS were 52% and 83%, respectively. The only factor that significantly correlated with better OS was the response to therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms that dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, and oxaliplatin ± rituximab is an effective and feasible outpatient regimen for salvage therapy in patients affected by relapsed or refractory lymphoma. Moreover, the feasibility and efficacy of this scheme as an in vivo chemosensitive test in patients in autotransplantation programs was confirmed.

Long-term follow-up of patients with diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving purged autografts after induction failure

Patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who do not achieve a complete response to front-line combination chemotherapy are often offered high-dose therapy and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT). However, the efficacy of this therapy in this patient population has been addressed in only a few published reports. We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of patients with a diagnosis of de novo DLBCL who underwent AHCT at our center between 1988 and 2002, and identified 43 consecutive patients who had not achieved a CR before AHCT, although most showed at least a partial response (PR) to either induction or subsequent salvage chemotherapy. A total of 15 patients received a conditioning regimen that included high-dose chemotherapy with fractionated TBI (FTBI), whereas 28 patients received high-dose chemotherapy only. All autografts were treated ex vivo with MoAbs and complement in an effort to remove any residual malignant B cells. A total of 33 (77%) patients achieved a CR after AHCT. With a median follow-up of 7.3 years, the 5-year OS was 69% and EFS was 59%. Four patients died from non-relapse mortality. By univariate analyses, the following characteristics did not significantly impact OS: disease stage at diagnosis, age-adjusted IPI (International Prognostic Index) score, age > or =40 years, earlier radiotherapy and the use of FTBI in the conditioning regimen. These results confirm the long-term efficacy of AHCT for patients with DLBCL after induction failure.

Autologous stem cell transplantation in lymphoma

High-dose therapy (HDT) followed by autologous transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells (ASCT) is frequently performed in patients with lymphoma. For many subentities, reliable results from prospective randomized studies are missing. In Hodgkin's disease (HD), HDT/ASCT is a standard indication for patients with chemosensitive first relapse. Patients with indolent or aggressive B-cell lymphoma may benefit from HDT/ASCT if considered as part of first-line therapy or at the time of relapse. However, new randomized studies comparing HDT/ASCT with optimal chemoimmunotherapy are necessary because the introduction of monoclonal antibodies (rituximab) significantly improved the results of conventional chemotherapy. Because data on patients with less frequent entities like mantle cell lymphoma, T-cell lymphoma, Burkitt's lymphoma, or lymphoblastic lymphoma are insufficient, the role of HDT/ASCT needs further study.

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation in the first line treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in adults

BACKGROUND

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support (HDT) has been proven effective in relapsed aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). However, conflicting results of HDT as part of first-line treatment have been reported in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effects of such treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation as part of first-line treatment improves survival in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cancer Lit, the Cochrane Library and smaller databases, Internet-databases of ongoing trials, conference proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the American Society of Hematology were searched. We included full-text, abstract publications and unpublished data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing conventional chemotherapy versus high-dose chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of adults with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma were included in this review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Eligibility and quality assessment, data extraction and analysis were done in duplicate. All authors were contacted to obtain missing data and asked to provide individual patient data.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifteen RCTs including 3079 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis. Overall treatment-related mortality was 6.0% in the HDT group and not significantly different compared to conventional chemotherapy (OR 1.33 [95% CI 0.91 to 1.93], P=0.14). 13 studies including 2018 patients showed significantly higher CR rates in the group receiving HDT (OR 1.32, [95% CI 1.09 to 1.59], P=0.004). However, HDT did not have an effect on OS, when compared to conventional chemotherapy. The pooled HR was 1.04 ([95% CI 0.91 to 1.18], P=0.58). There was no statistical heterogeneity among the trials. Sensitivity analyses underlined the robustness of these results. Subgroup analysis of prognostic groups according to IPI did not show any survival difference between HDT and controls in 12 trials (low and low-intermediate risk IPI: HR 1.41[95% CI 0.95 to 2.10], P=0.09; high-intermediate and high risk IPI: HR 0.97 [95% CI 0.83 to 1.13], P=0.71. Event-free survival (EFS) also showed no significant difference between HDT and CT (HR 0.93, [95% CI 0.81 to 1.07], P=0.31). Other possible risk factors such as the proportion of patient with diffuse large cell lymphoma, protocol adherence, HDT strategy, response status before HDT, conditioning regimens and methodological issues were analysed in sensitivity analyses. However, there was no evidence for an association between these factors and the results of our analyses.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

. Despite higher CR rates, there is no benefit for high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell transplantation as a first line treatment in patients with aggressive NHL.

Risk assessment in haemotopoietic stem cell transplantation: disease and disease stage

This chapter addresses the impact of the disease and disease status on the outcome of stem-cell transplantation. In consideration of the other topics addressed within this volume we have elected to focus on allogeneic rather than autologous transplantation. Furthermore we have not tried to be comprehensive and discuss the role of disease status in all conditions amenable to allografting, but rather to review the evidence that exists for selected haematological malignancies. Where possible we have made some clear recommendations, but where evidence is less clear we have indicated the ongoing controversies.

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support in first-line treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma - results of a comprehensive meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported conflicting results on the impact of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous stem cell transplantation in the first-line treatment of patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).

METHODS

We performed a systematic meta-analysis to assess the efficacy HDCT compared to conventional chemotherapy in aggressive NHL patients with regard to complete response (CR), overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), toxicity, and impact of the age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) risk factors. We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and other databases (1/1990 to 1/2005). Hazard ratio (HR), relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the fixed effect model.

RESULTS

Fifteen RCTs including 2728 patients were identified. HDCT improved CR when compared to conventional chemotherapy (RR 1.11, CI 1.04-1.18). Overall, there was no evidence for HDCT to improve OS (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.92-1.19) or EFS (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.80-1.05) when compared with conventional chemotherapy. However, subgroup analysis indicated OS differences (p=0.032) between good (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.02-2.09) and poor risk (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.81-1.11) patients. Conflicting results were reported for poor risk patients, where some studies reported improved and others reduced OS and EFS after HDCT.

CONCLUSION

There was no evidence that HDCT improved OS and EFS in good risk NHL patients. The evidence for poor risk patients is inconclusive. HDCT should not be further investigated in good risk patients with aggressive NHL but high quality studies in poor risk patients are warranted.

Phase II Clinical Trial of Combination Chemotherapy With Dexamethasone for Lymphoma in Dogs

Dogs with histologically confirmed lymphoma were treated with a 14-week induction chemotherapy protocol that included dexamethasone. A phase II clinical trial was done using a standard two-stage design. Complete remission occurred in 21 (88%) dogs, with a median initial progression-free interval of 186 days. Toxicity was mild and self-limiting in the majority of dogs.

Sequential doxorubicin and topotecan in relapsed/refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of CALGB 59906

Topoisomerase enzymes are critical components of genomic replication and function to minimize torsional stress on DNA. Sequential administration of a topoisomerase II inhibitor followed by a topoisomerase I inhibitor is potentially synergistic due to increased target enzyme levels. Patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL) were eligible for this phase II study of doxorubicin 25 mg/m2 intravenous (IV) on day 1 and topotecan 1.75 mg/m2/day IV on days 3 - 5, every 21 days. The trial objectives included the overall response rate, progression-free survival, and toxicity. Twenty-six patients were enrolled and 25 patients are assessable for toxicity and response. The median age was 58 (range 23 - 74) years. The patients had received a median of two (range one to five) prior regimens, including five patients with a prior stem cell transplant. Five patients (20%, 95% confidence interval 0.07, 0.42) responded with two (8%) complete remissions and three (12%) partial remissions; an additional four (16%) patients had stable disease. Both patients achieving a complete remission had Burkitt's lymphoma. There were no treatment-related deaths. In conclusion, the combination of doxorubicin and topotecan is well tolerated and has modest activity in relapsed/refractory NHL, with occasional patients having a prolonged remission. The activity in Burkitt's lymphoma should be investigated further.

Autologous stem cell transplantation beyond 60 years of age

Along with improved supportive care and thus reduced treatment-related mortality, an increasing number of elderly patients (> 60 years) with haematological malignancies are now considered for high-dose therapy (HDT) supported by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). ASCT is feasible in selected elderly patients with multiple myeloma and those with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. As elderly patients have generally been excluded from randomized studies evaluating efficacy of ASCT in comparison with non-transplant approaches, limited data are available on the efficacy of ASCT in this patient population. Recent developments in supportive care including amifostine and palifermin may increase feasibility of ASCT in elderly patients. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate feasibility and efficacy of ASCT in patients over 60 years of age. Also, further studies are needed in order to decrease toxicity of high-dose regimens in this patient group where co-morbid conditions may modify the toxicity of HDT in a clinically significant manner.

Autologous stem cell transplantation in elderly (>60 years) patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a nation-wide analysis

Limited experience is available on the feasibility and efficacy of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in elderly patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). In 1994-2004 altogether 88 NHL patients > 60 years old received ASCT in six Finnish transplant centres. There were 57 male and 31 female patients with a median age of 63 years (range 60-70 years); 17 patients were>65 years. The histology included diffuse large B cell (n = 29), mantle cell (n = 27), follicular (n = 15), peripheral T cell (n = 12) and other (n = 5). Disease status at ASCT was I complete remission/partial remission (CR/PR) in 53 patients, II CR/PR in 30 patients and other in five patients. The conditioning regimens included BEAC (n = 49), BEAM (n = 34), TBI-CY (n = 4) and other (n = 1). Eighty-four patients received PB grafts. The medians to reach neutrophils > 0.5 and platelets > 20 were 10 and 14 days, respectively. The early treatment-related mortality (TRM) (<100 days) was 11%. With a median follow-up of 21 months for all patients, 45 patients (51%) are alive. A relapse or progression after ASCT has been observed in 32 patients (36%). ASCT is feasible in selected elderly patients with NHL, but the early TRM seems to be higher than in younger patients.

Frontline therapy with early intensification and autologous stem cell transplantation versus conventional chemotherapy in unselected high-risk, aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients: a prospective randomized GEMOH report

This prospective multicenter randomized trial compares conventional with early intensification with high-dose sequential chemotherapy (HDS) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) as frontline therapy in high-risk non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL). Newly diagnosed patients with aggressive high-risk [intermediate-high (HI) and high-risk (HR)] NHL according to the international prognosis index (IPI) were randomized to receive 12-week VACOP-B (arm A, 27 patients) or 6-week VACOP-B followed by HDS and ASCT (arm B, 29 patients). Complete remission rate was 52% in arm A and 55% in B. Nine patients (16%) died early due to progression. According to intention-to-treat, with a median follow-up of 23 months, the 5-year actuarial overall survival, progression-free survival and disease-free survival in arms A and B were 47 and 40% (p = nonsignificant), 47 and 30% (p = nonsignificant), and 97 and 47% (p = 0.02), respectively. Abbreviated chemotherapy followed by intensification with HDS-ASCT does not seem to be superior to conventional chemotherapy in HI/HR aggressive NHL.

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas

Early studies on high-dose therapy followed by autologous bone marrow transplantation demonstrated the safety and efficacy of this approach in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). As the procedure became easier and safer with the introduction of peripheral blood progenitor cells instead of marrow, the popularity of this procedure declined. In the last decade, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has played an important role in front-line and salvage treatments of indolent and aggressive NHL.

Upfront high-dose sequential therapy (HDS) versus VACOP-B with or without HDS in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: long-term results by the NHLCSG

BACKGROUND

There is not univocal concordance for using high-dose sequential therapy (HDS) as first-line treatment for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). We designed this study to evaluate the usefulness of HDS followed by high-dose therapy (HDT) with autologous stem cell transplantation as front-line treatment in different subsets of aggressive NHL.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Among 223 patients aged 15-60 years with aggressive, advanced stage NHL, 106 patients were randomized to VACOP-B (etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone, bleomycin) for 12 weeks (plus HDS/HDT in case of persistent disease) (arm A), and 117 patients to VACOP-B for 8 weeks plus upfront HDS/HDT (arm B).

RESULTS

According to the intention-to-treat analysis, the complete response rate was 75% for arm A and 72.6% for arm B. With a median follow-up of 62 months there was no difference in 7-year probability of survival (60% and 57.8%; P = 0.5), disease-free survival (DFS) (62% and 71%; P = 0.2) and progression-free survival (PFS) (44.9% and 40.9%; P = 0.7) between the two arms. Subgroup analyses confirmed that the best results in terms of survival, DFS and PFS were achieved by patients with large B-cell NHL without bone marrow (BM) involvement, independently of the treatment arm. Results were poorer in other categories of patients and poorest in patients with BM involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Aggressive NHL patients do not benefit from upfront HDS/HDT.

Autologous stem-cell transplantation in diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma not achieving complete response after induction chemotherapy: the GEL/TAMO experience

BACKGROUND

Here we evaluate the results of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation (HDC/ASCT) in 114 patients included in the GEL/TAMO registry between January 1990 and December 1999 with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who failed to achieve complete remission (CR) with front-line conventional chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-eight per cent had a partial response (PR) and 32% failed to respond to front-line therapy. At transplant, 35% were chemoresistant and 29% had two to three adjusted International Prognostic Index (a-IPI) risk factors.

RESULTS

After HDC/ASCT, 57 (54%) of 105 patients evaluable for response achieved a CR, 16 (15%) a PR and 32 (30%) failed. Nine patients were not assessed for response because of early death due to toxicity. With a median follow-up of 29 months for alive patients, the survival at 5 years is 43%, with a disease-free survival for complete responders of 63%. The lethal toxicity was 8%. Multivariate analysis revealed a-IPI and chemoresistance to be predicting factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that one-third of patients who do not obtain a CR to front-line chemotherapy may be cured of their disease with HDC/ASCT. However, most chemoresistant patients pretransplant failed this therapy. For this population, as well as for those who presented with adverse factors of the a-IPI, pretransplant novel therapeutic modalities need to be tested.

Dose-intense cyclophosphamide and etoposide for patients with refractory or high-risk non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

A retrospective review was performed on the toxicity and response to one cycle of dose-intense cyclophosphamide/etoposide, followed by consolidation in patients with refractory or previously untreated, high-risk non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Fifty-five patients with refractory NHL and 13 with untreated, high-risk NHL were administered one cycle of daily cyclophosphamide 1.5 g/m2 intravenously on days 1-4 and etoposide 300 mg/m2 intravenously every 12 hours on days 1-3. Responders then received other consolidated regimens. Twenty-seven percent of patients with refractory disease had moderate or severe stomatitis, and 44% had moderate or severe infections with 6 (11%) dying of this complication. Similar complication rates were noted in the previously untreated, high-risk group, but there was no treatment-related mortality. The overall response rate to this one cycle of therapy was 31% in the refractory group, with 18% complete response and 13% partial response. The overall response rate in the previously untreated, high-risk group was 69%, with 54% complete and 15% partial responses. In responders, the 2-year event-free survival was 27% in the refractory group and 56% in high-risk group. Dose-intense cyclophosphamide/etoposide has promising efficacy; however, nonhematologic toxicity can be considerable. The better tolerance, high response rate, and encouraging 2-year survival of this regimen in combination with further dose-dense consolidation in patients with high-risk NHL are encouraging.

Long-term follow-up after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation for high-grade B-cell lymphoma suggests an improved outcome for high-risk patients with respect to the age-adjusted International Prognostic Index

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the long-term benefit from high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT), as part of the initial treatment for patients with chemosensitive, high-grade B non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (hg B-NHL), stratified according to the age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients were 33 consecutive hg B-NHL patients responding to first-line chemotherapy and fulfilling at least one of the following criteria: stage III or IV, bulky disease, elevated lactate dehydrogenase or failure to achieve complete remission (CR). Twenty-two of 33 patients (67%) had two or three risk factors with respect to the aaIPI. All patients received HDCT with ASCT after a minimum of 6 weeks of VACOP-B standard therapy and VIP-E for mobilization.

RESULTS

After ASCT, 31 patients (94%) achieved CR. No treatment-related death occurred. The cumulative incidence of relapse at a medium follow-up of 10 years is 16% for 31 of 33 patients achieving CR. Twenty-five of 33 patients are in sustained CR with a disease-free survival of 76% [95% confidence interval (CI) 67% to 86%]. The overall survival at a median follow-up of 122 months (range 86-148) is 79% (95% CI 68% to 89%).

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that up-front HDCT with ASCT may improve long-term outcome in high-risk patients with chemotherapy-sensitive hg B-NHL when compared to historic populations treated solely with dose-intense chemotherapy. We observed that long-term survival of high-risk (two to three risk factors) patients is comparable to low-risk (zero to one risk factor) patients after HDCT and ASCT with a low incidence of late relapse.

Autologous transplantation of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-primed bone marrow is effective in supporting myeloablative chemotherapy in patients with hematologic malignancies and poor peripheral blood stem cell mobilization

We assessed the hematopoietic recovery and transplantation-related mortality (TRM) of patients who had failed peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and subsequently received high-dose chemotherapy supported by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-primed bone marrow (BM). Studied were 86 heavily pretreated consecutive patients with acute leukemia (n = 21), refractory/relapsed non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 41) and Hodgkin disease (n = 17), and multiple myeloma (n = 7). There were 78 patients who showed insufficient mobilization of CD34+ cells (< 10 cells/microL), whereas 8 patients collected less than 1 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg. BM was primed in vivo for 3 days with 15 to 16 microg/kg of subcutaneous G-CSF. Median numbers of nucleated cells, colony-forming unit cells (CFU-Cs), and CD34+ cells per kilogram harvested were 3.5 x 10(8), 3.72 x 10(4), and 0.82 x 10(6), respectively. Following myeloablative chemotherapy, median times to achieve a granulocyte count higher than 0.5 x 10(9)/L and an unsupported platelet count higher than 20 and 50 x 10(9)/L were 13 (range, 8-24), 15 (range, 12-75), and 22 (range, 12-180) days, respectively, for lymphoma/myeloma patients and 23 (range, 13-53), 52 (range, 40-120), and 90 (range, 46-207) days, respectively, for leukemia patients. Median times to hospital discharge after transplantation were 17 (range, 12-40) and 27 (range, 14-39) days for lymphoma/myeloma and acute leukemia patients, respectively. TRM was 4.6%, whereas 15 patients died of disease. G-CSF-primed BM induces effective multilineage hematopoietic recovery after high-dose chemotherapy and can be safely used in patients with poor stem cell mobilization.

BEAC or BEAM for high-dose therapy in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma? A single centre analysis on toxicity and efficacy

High-dose chemotherapy supported by autologous stem cell transplantation is widely used in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Limited data is available on the comparative toxicity and efficacy of various high-dose regimens applied in NHL. We therefore analysed regimen-related toxicity and outcome in 71 consecutive NHL patients who received either BEAC (N = 36) or BEAM (N = 35) supported by peripheral blood progenitor cell infusion plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. The patients who received BEAM had significantly more often WHO grade > 2 mucositis (63 vs. 28%, P = 0.009) and diarrhoea grade >2 (29 vs. 8%, P = 0.062). Septicaemia also tended to be more frequent and the peak CRP value was higher in the BEAM group (140 vs. 113 mg/l, P = 0.034). Transplant-related mortality (< 100 d) was 3 and 9% in the BEAC and BEAM groups, respectively. No significant differences were observed in overall survival or progression free survival between these two groups. While BEAC and BEAM appears to have equal antitumour efficacy in patients with NHL, BEAM seems to be more toxic to the gastrointestinal tract. However, randomised studies are needed for more definitive conclusions on the relative merits of various high-dose regimens in patients with NHL.

Early autologous stem-cell transplantation versus conventional chemotherapy as front-line therapy in high-risk, aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: an Italian multicenter randomized trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the role of early intensification with high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) as front-line chemotherapy for patients with high-risk, histologically aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We planned a multicenter, randomized trial to compare a conventional chemotherapy regimen of methotrexate with leucovorin rescue, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone, and bleomycin (MACOP-B; arm A) with an abbreviated regimen of MACOP-B (8 weeks) followed by HDT and ASCT (arm B) for intermediate-high-risk/high-risk patients (according to the age-adjusted International Prognostic Index). From September 1994 to April 1998, 150 patients with aggressive lymphoma were enrolled onto the trial. Seventy-five patients were randomly assigned to arm A and 75 patients were randomly assigned to arm B. In both arms, involved-field radiation therapy (36 Gy) was delivered to the site of bulky disease.

RESULTS

The rate of complete response was 68% in arm A and 76% in arm B (P = not significant [NS]). Three toxic deaths (4%) occurred in arm B and one (1%) occurred in arm A (P = NS). In arm B, 30 patients (40%) did not undergo HDT and ASCT. According to the intention-to-treat analysis at a median follow-up of 24 months, 5-year overall survival probability in arms A and B was 65% and 64% (P =.95), 5-year progression-free survival was 49% and 61% (P =.21), and 5-year relapse-free survival was 65% and 77% (P =.22), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Abbreviated chemotherapy followed by intensification with HDT-ASCT is not superior to conventional chemotherapy in patients with high-risk, aggressive NHL. Additional randomized trials will clarify whether HDT-ASCT as front-line therapy after a complete course of conventional chemotherapy improves survival in this group of patients.

Autologous and allogeneic transplantation for aggressive NHL

BACKGROUND

Intermediate- and high-grade NHL are generally chemosensitive diseases with high initial response rates to combination chemotherapy. Dose intensification via autologous and allogeneic transplantation provides viable treatment options in specific clinical settings. Currently, autologous transplantation is the standard of care for relapsed but chemosensitive aggressive B-cell NHL. However, tools such as the International Prognostic Index allow risk-adapted analyses, and show that the magnitude of benefit from autologous transplantation differs in lymphoma subsets.

METHODS

Low-risk patients appear to do well regardless of salvage approaches, whereas high-risk patients have suboptimal outcomes with autologous transplantation. In high-risk patients, high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation has been examined as part of initial therapy, with long-term data promising but still evolving.

DISCUSSION

A significant concern with autologous transplantation in aggressive and high-grade NHL is the risk of graft contamination with tumor cells. Several investigators have demonstrated the presence of malignant cells in both BM and PBSC, although the clonagenic potential of such cells is unclear. Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation has several potential advantages over autologous transplantation for NHL,including procurement of an uncontaminated stem-cell graft, GvL effects, and the elimination of hematopoietic stem-cell damage and consequent secondary leukemia.

RESULTS

The ideal application of allogeneic transplantation in aggressive and high-grade lymphomas is still unclear; but the lower relapse rates demonstrated in several comparisons of the two approaches make this an exciting area to pursue. Finally, non-myeloablative stem-cell transplantation may broaden the use of allogeneic transplantation by lowering regimen-related mortality while capitalizing on GvL.

High-dose therapy in diffuse large cell lymphoma: results and prognostic factors in 452 patients from the GEL-TAMO Spanish Cooperative Group

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to analyse the results and prognostic factors influencing overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in 452 patients diagnosed with diffuse large cell lymphomas (DLCL) treated with high-dose therapy (HDT) included in the Grupo Español de Linfomas/Trasplante Autólogo de Médula Osea (GEL-TAMO) Spanish registry.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

At transplantation, median age was 42 years (range 15-73), 146 patients (32%) were transplanted in first complete remission (1st CR), 19% in second CR (2nd CR) and 47% had active disease: sensitive disease in 157 (35%) patients [95 were in first partial remission (1st PR) and 62 in second PR (2nd PR)] and refractory disease in 55 (12%) patients. Age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (IPI) was 2 or 3 in 51 patients (12%). Conditioning regimen consisted of BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan) in 39% of patients, BEAC (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine and cyclophosphamide) in 33%, CBV (carmustine, etoposide and cyclophosphamide) in 10% and cyclophosphamide plus total body irradiation (TBI) in 12%.

RESULTS

Estimated overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years were 53% and 43%, respectively. The transplant-related mortality was 11% (53 cases). By multivariate analysis three variables significantly influenced OS and DFS: number of protocols to reach 1st CR, disease status at transplant and TBI in the conditioning regimen. Age-adjusted IPI at transplantation also influenced OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged OS and DFS can be achieved in patients with DLCL after HDT and our results suggest that the best line of chemotherapy should be used up-front in patients considered as candidates for HDT in order to obtain an early CR. Resistant patients are not good candidates for HDT and they should be offered newer strategies. Finally, polichemotherapy conditioning regimens offer better results compared with TBI.

Overview of rational and individualized therapeutic strategies for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas

For nearly 20 years CHOP (cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone) has been the gold standard of therapy for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHLs), curing = 30% of patients with diffuse large-cell NHL. A variety of strategies are being tested to identify regimens that might increase the disease-free survival rate for aggressive NHLs. One approach has been to intensify chemotherapy either by administering higher doses or by using shorter chemotherapy cycles. There are data suggesting that elderly patients benefit from CHOP given in 14-day cycles with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Based on in vitro observations that continuous exposure to cytotoxic agents can override multidrug-resistance pumps, several groups have studied combination chemotherapy regimens that include continuous 2- or 3-day intravenous infusions of cytotoxic agents. These studies have had short follow-up but encouraging early disease-free survival rates. There also has been interest in integrating monoclonal antibodies such as rituximab into therapies for aggressive NHLs. One randomized trial found CHOP/rituximab to be superior to CHOP alone in elderly patients with aggressive NHLs. With high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell support established as a salvage regimen for aggressive NHLs, many trials have evaluated the value of upfront high-dose therapy, especially in poor-prognosis patients. Other approaches to managing aggressive NHLs, which appear promising but are under investigation, are allogeneic transplants and lymphoma vaccines. An advance in the study of lymphoid malignancies is the development of a lymphoma classification system, the World Health Organization Classification of Lymphoid Malignancies, which recognizes the distinct molecular, morphologic, and genetic characteristics of differential lymphoma subtypes. It is anticipated that accurate and specific differential diagnosis, coupled with recognition of important clinical prognostic factors, will provide useful background for selecting and designing rational (and perhaps individualized) therapies for patients with aggressive NHLs.

Randomized study to evaluate the use of high-dose therapy as part of primary treatment for "aggressive" lymphoma

PURPOSE

This trial of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group compares the use of high-dose therapy (HDT) as part of primary treatment with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) plus etoposide followed by involved-field (IF) radiotherapy in a randomized, multicenter, phase III study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three hundred twelve patients with "aggressive" non-Hodgkin's lymphoma aged <or= 60 years with elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase levels were included from 1990 to 1997. Patients with at least a minor response after two cycles of CHOEP (CHOP + etoposide 3 x 100 mg/m(2)) were to receive three further cycles of CHOEP followed by IF radiotherapy (arm A) or one further cycle of CHOEP followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation and IF radiotherapy (arm B).

RESULTS

Among 158 patients randomized to arm B, 103 (65%) received HDT. The complete remission rate at the end of treatment was 62.9% in arm A and 69.9% in arm B. With a median observation time of 45.5 months, overall survival for all 312 patients was 63% after 3 years (63% for arm A, 62% for arm B; P =.68). Event-free survival was 49% for arm A versus 59% for arm B (P =.22). Relapse in arm B was associated with a significantly worse survival rate than relapse in arm A (P <.05). Relapse after HDT occurred early (median interval, 3 months). Six patients developed secondary neoplasia, three in arm A and three in arm B.

CONCLUSION

Results of the randomized trial comparing CHOP-like chemotherapy with early HDT do not support the use of HDT with carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan following shortened standard chemotherapy.

High-dose treatment with autologous haemopoietic progenitor cell support for large B-cell, follicular and mantle-cell lymphoma

The purpose of this chapter is to review the available information on the use of high-dose treatment (HDT) in large B-cell, follicular and mantle-cell lymphoma. The last 10 years have seen a dramatic increase in the number of patients receiving high-dose treatment with autologous haemopoietic progenitor cell support for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. In patients with recurrent large B-cell lymphoma, HDT is now accepted as the 'standard of care', provided responsiveness to conventional chemotherapy at the time of recurrence has been demonstrated. In contrast, the situation in newly diagnosed patients is far from clear. Several phase III studies have been conducted, comparing conventional chemotherapy with either: the same treatment followed by HDT or an abbreviated number of cycles of conventional therapy followed by HDT. The results hitherto have not conclusively shown an advantage for HDT. In mantle-cell and follicular lymphoma, HDT should still be regarded as experimental. Current studies are evaluating the use of anti-CD20, given either as part of the treatment prior to HDT or as maintenance therapy. In view of the propensity for both of these illnesses to involve the bone marrow, a number of studies have addressed the question of in vitro treatment of the stem cell product. The advent of PCR analysis has made it possible to evaluate the significance of 'molecular remission'. In follicular lymphoma, there is a correlation between freedom from recurrence and persistent PCR negativity for bcl-2 rearrangement-containing cells in follow-up bone marrow samples.

Dexamethasone, Cytarabine, and Cisplatin (DHAP) Regimen for Refractory or Relapsed Lymphomas

The increasing complexity of cancer chemotherapy makes it mandatory that pharmacists be familiar with these highly toxic agents. This column reviews various issues related to the preparation, dispensing, and administration of cancer chemotherapy, both commercially available and investigational.

Dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, and oxaliplatin (DHAOx) as salvage treatment for patients with initially refractory or relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Dexamethasone. cytarabine (ara-C), and cisplatin (DHAP) can be used effectively to treat patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). We hypothesized that substitution of cisplatin by oxaliplatin (L-OHP) could result in less toxicity and greater efficacy. L-OHP is active in patients with lymphoma. It produces mild myelosuppression and is devoid of renal toxicity. We report on a phase II study of dexamethasone, high-dose ara-C, and L-OHP (DHAOx) used to treat patients with NHL who were previously treated with chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifteen patients were given DHAOx. They had failed to achieve a CR with initial chemotherapy or had recurrent disease. DHAOx consisted of dexamethasone, 40 mg/day (days 1 to 4): L-OHP, 130 mg/m2 (day 1); and ara-C, 2,000 mg/m2 every 12 h (day 2). Treatment was repeated every 21 days.

RESULTS

Patients received a median of four courses of DHAOx. Myelosuppression and transient sensory peripheral neuropathy were the most prominent toxic effects. Serum creatinine levels did not increase in patients with normal renal function, nor in patients who had renal impairment before DHAOx. The median follow-up time from the start of DHAOx treatment was 17 months. Eight patients (53%) achieved a CR, and three patients (20%) had a PR. Responses were achieved by patients with lymphomas of various histologies that included mainly the follicular subtype, and by patients with and without resistance to prior chemotherapy. None of the eight responders have relapsed from CR at 4+. 6+, 14+, 15+, 19+, 20+, 24+, and 24+ months. They had various types of therapy after DHAOx. Disappearance of molecular markers was observed in all four patients who achieved a CR and whose tumor cells carried molecular abnormalities.

CONCLUSION

DHAOx possesses characteristics of toxicity which compare favorably to those reported with DHAP, and it is useful as a salvage treatment for patients with NHL. Larger studies are required to establish the therapeutic potential of the regimen.

High-dose therapy and autologous transplantation for lymphoma: The Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute experience

BACKGROUND

High-dose therapy (HDT) with autologous bone marrow or blood cell transplantation for the treatment of lymphoma commenced at Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute in 1986.

AIM

To examine the patient characteristics and outcomes of patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and Hodgkin's disease (HD) treated with HDT and autologous transplantation at our Institute in the first 10 years of the service (1986-95).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed examining patient characteristics, prior chemotherapy regimens, pretransplant disease status, HDT regimen, source of stem cells, time for haematopoietic recovery, complications of transplantation, response rates, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients with NHL were treated with an estimated 5-year OS rate of 44% (95% confidence interval (CI) 32-56%) and PFS rate of 34% (95% CI 21-44%). Factors independently predictive of an unfavourable PFS on multivariate analyses were presence of constitutional symptoms at transplant (P < 0.002) and chemotherapy-resistant disease at transplant (P = 0.02). Twenty-three patients with HD were treated with a 5-year predicted OS rate of 74% (95% CI 56-92%) and PFS rate of 57% (95% CI 36-77%). There was no difference in PFS for HD patients who relapsed either within 12 months of completion of front-line therapy or after this time (P= 0.5). The transplant-related mortality for the entire cohort was 17%, with a progressive decrease over time.

CONCLUSION

HDT with autologous transplantation achieves durable PFS and OS in patients with lymphoma. Improved patient selection, therapy modifications according to prognostic factors and ongoing improvements in supportive care should improve outcomes further.

Radiation therapy after a partial response to CHOP chemotherapy for aggressive lymphomas

PURPOSE

To analyze the results with involved-field radiotherapy after aggressive lymphomas had decreased in size by 50-99% in response to cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP)-based chemotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 1988 through 1996, 294 previously untreated patients with Working Formulation intermediate-grade or large-cell immunoblastic lymphomas underwent CHOP-based chemotherapy on 2 consecutive protocols at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. Forty-four (15%) of these patients achieved, based on international working group guidelines, a partial (50-75%) response (n = 25), or unconfirmed complete (76-99%) response (n = 19) to a median of 6 cycles of chemotherapy. These patients were treated with salvage involved-field radiotherapy (n = 32) or chemotherapy (n = 12), e.g., MINE-ESHAP, without autologous stem-cell rescue (ASCR).

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 43 months. Partial responders experienced similar outcomes to unconfirmed complete responders. Local control (4-year rates: 86% vs. 53%, p = 0.009) and progression-free survival (4-year rates: 67% vs. 8%, p < 0.0001), but not overall survival (4-year rates: 70% vs. 50%, p = 0.067) were significantly better in those who received salvage radiotherapy, which was well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Progression-free and overall survival in aggressive lymphoma patients who underwent salvage radiotherapy were similar to results reported for high-dose chemotherapy with ASCR. The role of salvage radiotherapy in partial and unconfirmed complete responders to CHOP chemotherapy justifies examination in a large, cooperative group trial.

Bone Marrow TransplantationCurrent Clinical Practice: High-Dose Chemotherapy and Stem Cell Transplantation for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Review of Recent Advances

The past decade has seen impressive achievements in the development of HDT/SCT for NHL, but much remains to be accomplished. Attention can be focused now on high risk patients whose outcome with HDT/SCT, as currently practiced, is poor. This is particularly true for patients with refractory or resistant disease. The preliminary research work summarized in this review leads us to believe that further progress is forthcoming, to the benefit of the patient's survival and quality of life.

Autologous stem cell transplantation for clinically aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: the role of preparative regimens

We investigated the impact of the most commonly used preparative regimens on the outcome of 395 patients with diffuse large cell lymphoma (DLCL), consecutively reported to the registry of the Spanish GEL/TAMO. Among them, 139 (35%) were autografted in 1st CR, 86 (22%) in 2nd/3rd CR, 124 (31%) had chemosensitive disease and 46 (12%) had chemoresistant disease. Conditioning consisted of chemotherapy-only in 348 patients (BEAM, 164; BEAC, 145; and CBV, 39) and radiochemotherapy with CY and TBI in 47. Median times to granulocyte, platelet recovery and to discharge were significantly shorter in the chemotherapy-only group. Early transplant-related mortality was significantly higher when using CY-TBI. After a median follow-up of 28 months, overall survival (OS) at 8 years of patients conditioned with BEAM or BEAC (58% (95% CI 50-66%)) was more favorable than with CBV (40% (95% CI 24-56%)), and significantly better than with CY-TBI (31% (95% CI 18-44%)). Multivariate analysis revealed that patients conditioned with chemotherapy-only regimens had improved OS, disease-free (DFS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) when compared to those conditioned with CY-TBI. Status at transplant was also a powerful prognostic indicator. We conclude that preparative regimens consisting of chemotherapy-only seem more efficacious than CY-TBI as conditioning for DLCL, because of faster engraftment and greater anti-lymphoma effect, as indicated by improved OS, DFS and RFS.

Autologous transplantation for diffuse aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in patients never achieving remission: a report from the Autologous Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry

PURPOSE

To evaluate the results of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (autotransplants) in patients with diffuse aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) who never achieve a complete remission with conventional chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Detailed records from the Autologous Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry (ABMTR) on 184 patients with diffuse aggressive NHL who never achieved a complete remission with conventional chemotherapy and subsequently received an autotransplant were evaluated. Transplants were performed between 1989 and 1995 and were reported to the ABMTR by 48 centers in North and South America.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine (44%) of 184 patients achieved a complete remission or a complete remission with residual imaging abnormalities of unknown significance after autotransplantation. Thirty-four (19%) of 184 had a partial remission and 55 (31%) of 184 had no response or progressive disease. Eleven patients (6%) were not assessable for response because of early death. The probabilities of progression-free and overall survival at 5 years after transplantation were 31% (95% confidence interval [CI], 24% to 38%) and 37% (95% CI, 30% to 45%), respectively. In multivariate analysis, chemotherapy resistance, Karnofsky performance status score less than 80 at transplantation, age > or = 55 years at transplantation, receiving three or more prior chemotherapy regimens, and not receiving pre- or posttransplant involved-field irradiation therapy were adverse prognostic factors for overall survival.

CONCLUSION

High-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation should be considered for patients with diffuse aggressive NHL who never achieve a complete remission but who are still chemotherapy-sensitive and are otherwise transplant candidates.

Standard chemotherapy with or without high-dose chemotherapy for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: randomized phase III EORTC study

BACKGROUND

The long-term outcome for patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) is poor. Consequently, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lymphoma Group designed a prospective randomized trial to investigate whether high-dose chemotherapy plus autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) after standard combination chemotherapy improves long-term survival.

METHODS

Patients aged 15-65 years with aggressive NHL received three cycles of CHVmP/BV polychemotherapy (i.e., a combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, teniposide, and prednisone, with bleomycin and vincristine added at mid-cycle). After these three cycles, patients with a complete or partial remission and at that time no lymphoma involvement in the bone marrow were randomly assigned to the ABMT arm (a further three cycles of CHVmP/BV followed by BEAC [i.e., a combination of carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and cyclophosphamide] chemotherapy and ABMT) or to the control arm (five more cycles of CHVmP/BV). All statistical tests are two-sided.

RESULTS

From December 1990 through October 1998, 311 patients (median age = 44 years) were registered and received the first three cycles of CHVmP/BV, and 194 patients were randomly assigned to the treatment arms. Approximately 70% (140 patients) of these patients were of low or low-intermediate International Prognostic Index (IPI) risk. After a median follow-up of 53 months, an intention-to-treat analysis showed a time to disease progression and overall survival at 5 years of 61% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 51% to 72%) and 68% (95% CI = 57% to 79%), respectively, for the ABMT arm and 56% (95% CI = 45% to 67%) and 77% (95% CI = 67% to 86%), respectively, for the control arm. Differences between arms were not statistically significant. A subset analysis on IPI risk groups, although too small for reliable statistical analysis, yielded similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

Standard combination therapies remain the best choice for most patients with aggressive NHL. We recommend that patients with IPI low or low-intermediate risk not be subjected to high-dose chemotherapy and ABMT as a first-line therapy.