Phase I trial of docetaxel administered as a 1-hour infusion in children with refractory solid tumors: a collaborative pediatric branch, National Cancer Institute and Children's Cancer Group trial

Augmented efficacy of nano-formulated docetaxel plus curcumin in orthotopic models of neuroblastoma

Neuroblastoma is a biologically heterogeneous extracranial tumor, derived from the sympathetic nervous system, that affects most often the pediatric population. Therapeutic strategies relying on aggressive chemotherapy, surgery, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy have a negative outcome in advanced or recurrent disease. Here, spherical polymeric nanomedicines (SPN) are engineered to co-deliver a potent combination therapy, including the cytotoxic docetaxel (DTXL) and the natural wide-spectrum anti-inflammatory curcumin (CURC). Using an oil-in-water emulsion/solvent evaporation technique, four SPN configurations were engineered depending on the therapeutic payload and characterized for their physico-chemical and pharmacological properties. All SPN configurations presented a hydrodynamic diameter of ∼ 185 nm with a narrow size distribution. A biphasic release profile was observed for all the configurations, with almost 90 % of the total drug mass released within the first 24 h. SPN cytotoxic potential was assessed on a panel of human neuroblastoma cells, returning IC₅₀ values in the order of 1 nM at 72 h and documenting a strong synergism between CURC and DTXL. Therapeutic efficacy was tested in a clinically relevant orthotopic model of neuroblastoma, following the injection of SH-SY5Y-Luc⁺ cells in the left adrenal gland of athymic mice. Although ∼ 2 % of the injected SPN per mass tissue reached the tumor, the overall survival of mice treated with CURC/DTXL-SPN was extended by 50 % and 25 % as compared to the untreated control and the monotherapies, respectively. In conclusion, these results demonstrate that the therapeutic potential of the DTXL/CURC combination can be fully exploited only by reformulating these two compounds into systemically injectable nanoparticles.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in children and adolescent cancer patients

Brain cancer and leukemia are the most common cancers diagnosed in the pediatric population and are often treated with lifesaving chemotherapy. However, chemotherapy causes severe adverse effects and chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a major dose-limiting and debilitating side effect. CIPN can greatly impair quality of life and increases morbidity of pediatric patients with cancer, with the accompanying symptoms frequently remaining underdiagnosed. Little is known about the incidence of CIPN, its impact on the pediatric population, and the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, as most existing information stems from studies in animal models or adult cancer patients. Herein, we aim to provide an understanding of CIPN in the pediatric population and focus on the 6 main substance groups that frequently cause CIPN, namely the vinca alkaloids (vincristine), platinum-based antineoplastics (cisplatin, carboplatin and oxaliplatin), taxanes (paclitaxel and docetaxel), epothilones (ixabepilone), proteasome inhibitors (bortezomib) and immunomodulatory drugs (thalidomide). We discuss the clinical manifestations, assessments and diagnostic tools, as well as risk factors, pathophysiological processes and current pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches for the prevention and treatment of CIPN.

Phase II results from a phase I/II study to assess the safety and efficacy of weekly nab-paclitaxel in paediatric patients with recurrent or refractory solid tumours: A collaboration with the European Innovative Therapies for Children with Cancer Network

BACKGROUND

The phase I component of a phase I/II study defined the recommended phase II dose and established the tolerability of nab-paclitaxel monotherapy in paediatric patients with recurrent or refractory solid tumours. The activity and safety of nab-paclitaxel monotherapy was further investigated in this phase II study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Paediatric patients with recurrent or refractory Ewing sarcoma, neuroblastoma or rhabdomyosarcoma received 240 mg/m² of nab-paclitaxel on days 1, 8 and 15 of each 28-day cycle. The primary end-point was the overall response rate (ORR; complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]). Secondary end-points included duration of response, disease control rate (DCR; CR + PR + stable disease [SD]), progression-free survival, 1-year overall survival, safety and pharmacokinetics.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients were enrolled, 14 each with Ewing sarcoma, neuroblastoma and rhabdomyosarcoma. The ORRs were 0%, 0% and 7.1% (1 confirmed PR), respectively. The DCRs were 30.8% (4 SD), 7.1% (1 SD) and 7.1% (1 confirmed PR and 0 SD) in the Ewing sarcoma, neuroblastoma and rhabdomyosarcoma groups, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 13.0, 7.4 and 5.1 weeks, respectively, and the 1-year overall survival rates were 48%, 25% and 15%, respectively. The most common grade III/4IVadverse events were haematologic (neutropenia [50%] and anaemia [48%]), and grade III/IV peripheral neuropathy occurred in 2 patients (14%) in the rhabdomyosarcoma group. Pharmacokinetics analyses revealed that paclitaxel tissue distribution was both rapid and extensive.

CONCLUSIONS

In this phase II study, limited activity was observed; however, the safety of nab-paclitaxel in paediatric patients was confirmed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01962103 and EudraCT 2013-000144-26.

Phase I results of a phase I/II study of weekly nab-paclitaxel in paediatric patients with recurrent/refractory solid tumours: A collaboration with innovative therapies for children with cancer

BACKGROUND

nab-Paclitaxel has demonstrated efficacy in adults with solid tumours and preclinical activity in paediatric solid tumour models. Results from phase I of a phase I/II study in paediatric patients with recurrent/refractory solid tumours treated with nab-paclitaxel are reported.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with recurrent/refractory extracranial solid tumours received nab-paclitaxel on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks at 120, 150, 180, 210, 240, or 270 mg/m² (rolling-6 dose-escalation) to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D).

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients were treated. Dose-limiting toxicities were grade 3 dizziness at 120 mg/m² and grade 4 neutropenia >7 days at 270 mg/m². The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events were haematologic, including neutropenia (36%), leukopenia (36%) and lymphopenia (25%). Although the MTD was not reached, 270 mg/m² was declared non-tolerable due to grade 3/4 toxicities during cycles 1-2 (neutropenia, n = 5/7; skin toxicity, n = 2/7; peripheral neuropathy, n = 1/7). Of 58 efficacy-evaluable patients, complete response occurred in one patient (2%; Ewing sarcoma) and partial responses in four patients (7%; rhabdomyosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, renal tumour with pulmonary metastases [high-grade, malignant] and sarcoma not otherwise specified); all responses occurred at ≥210 mg/m². Thirteen patients (22%) had stable disease (5 lasting ≥16 weeks) per RECIST.

CONCLUSIONS

nab-Paclitaxel 240 mg/m² qw3/4 (nearly double the adult recommended monotherapy dose for this schedule in metastatic breast cancer) was selected as the RP2D based on the tolerability profile, pharmacokinetics and antitumour activity. Phase II is currently enrolling patients with recurrent/refractory neuroblastoma, rhabdomyosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT01962103.

EUDRACT

2013-000144-26.

Recent Advances of Cell-Cycle Inhibitor Therapies for Pediatric Cancer

This review describes the pivotal roles of cell-cycle and checkpoint regulators and discusses development of specific cell-cycle inhibitors for therapeutic use for pediatric cancer. The mechanism of action as well as the safety and tolerability of drugs in pediatric patients, including compounds that target CDK4/CDK6 (palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib), aurora kinases (AT9283 and MLN8237), Wee1 kinase (MK-1775), KSP (ispinesib), and tubulin (taxanes, vinca alkaloids), are presented. The design of mechanism-based combinations that exploit the cross-talk of signals activated by cell-cycle arrest, as well as pediatric-focused drug development, are critical for the advancement of drugs for rare childhood diseases. Cancer Res; 77(23); 6489-98. ©2017 AACR.

A comparison of safety and efficacy of cytotoxic versus molecularly targeted drugs in pediatric phase I solid tumor oncology trials

BACKGROUND

Prior reviews of phase I pediatric oncology trials involving primarily cytotoxic agents have reported objective response rates (ORRs) and toxic death rates of 7.9-9.6% and 0.5%, respectively. These data may not reflect safety and efficacy in phase I trials of molecularly targeted (targeted) drugs.

METHODS

A systematic review of pediatric phase I solid tumor trials published in 1990-2013 was performed. The published reports were evaluated for patient characteristics, toxicity information, and response numbers.

RESULTS

A total of 143 phase I pediatric clinical trials enrolling 3,896 children involving 53 targeted and 48 cytotoxic drugs were identified. A meta-analysis demonstrated that the ORR is 2.1-fold higher with cytotoxic drugs (0.066 vs. 0.031 per subject; P = 0.007). By contrast, the pooled estimate of the stable disease rate (SDR) is similar for cytotoxic and targeted drugs (0.2 vs. 0.23 per subject; P = 0.27).  The pooled estimate of the dose-limiting toxicity rate is 1.8-fold larger with cytotoxic drugs (0.24 vs. 0.13 per subject; P = 0.0003). The hematologic grade 3-4 (G3/4) toxicity rate is 3.6-fold larger with cytotoxic drugs (0.43 vs. 0.12 per treatment course; P = 0.0001); however, the nonhematologic G3/4 toxicities and toxic deaths occur at similar rates for cytotoxic and targeted drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

In phase I pediatric solid tumor trials, ORRs were significantly higher for cytotoxic versus targeted agents. SDRs were similar in targeted and cytotoxic drug trials. Patients treated with cytotoxic agents were more likely to experience hematologic G3/4 toxicities than those patients receiving targeted drugs.

Phase I and Phase II Objective Response Rates are Correlated in Pediatric Cancer Trials: An Argument for Better Clinical Trial Efficiency

Although many phase I trials report tumor response, formal analysis of efficacy is deferred to phase II. We reviewed paired phase I and II pediatric oncology trials to ascertain the relationship between phase I and II objective response rate (OR%). Single-agent phase I trials were paired with corresponding phase II trials (comparable study drug, dosing schedule, and population). Phase I trials without efficacy data or a matching phase II trial were excluded. OR% was tabulated for all trials, and phase II authors' subjective conclusions regarding efficacy were documented; 35 pairs of trials were analyzed. The correlation between phase I and II OR% was 0.93. Between phase II studies with a "positive" conclusion versus a "negative" one, there was a statistically significant difference in mean phase I OR% (32.0% vs. 4.5%, P<0.001). Thirteen phase II studies were undertaken despite phase I OR% of 0%; only 1 had a "positive" conclusion, and none exceeded OR% of 15%. OR% are highly correlated between phase I and II pediatric oncology trials. Although not a formal measure of drug efficacy, phase I OR% may provide an estimate of phase II response, inform phase II study design, and should be given greater consideration.

Nephronophthisis: should we target cysts or fibrosis?

Ciliopathy nephronophthisis (NPHP), a common cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in children and young adults, is characterized by disintegration of the tubular basement membrane accompanied by irregular thickening and attenuation, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, and occasionally cortico-medullary cyst formation. Pharmacological approaches that delay the development of ESRD could potentially extend the window of therapeutic opportunity for this group of patients, generating time to find an appropriate donor or even for new treatments to mature. In this review we provide an overview of compounds that have been tested to ameliorate kidney cysts and/or fibrosis. We also revisit paclitaxel as a potential strategy to target fibrosis in NPHP. At low dosage this chemotherapy drug shows promising results in rodent models of renal fibrosis. Possible adverse events and safety of paclitaxel treatment in pediatric patients would need to be investigated, as would the efficacy, optimum dose, and administration schedule for the treatment of renal fibrosis in NPHP patients. Paclitaxel is an approved drug for human use with known pharmacokinetics, which could potentially be used in other ciliopathies through targeting the microtubule skeleton.

International randomized phase 2 study on the addition of docetaxel to the combination of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in the induction treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in children and adolescents

PURPOSE

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a rare but aggressive malignancy in children and adolescents. An international, randomized phase 2 trial was conducted to compare induction chemotherapy with docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (PF) in NPC patients under the age of 21.

METHODS

Patients with stage IIB-IV NPC were randomly assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, to receive TPF or PF 3-weekly for three cycles, followed by chemoradiotherapy. The primary endpoint was the complete response rate achieved with TPF or PF. Docetaxel pharmacokinetics was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients (median 16 years old) were randomized, with 50 assigned to the TPF group and 25 to the PF group. Overall response was assessed after induction treatment: one patient in the TPF group and none in the PF group had a complete response. Partial response was achieved in 76.0 and 80.0 % in the TPF and PF groups, respectively. The overall safety profile was consistent with findings in adults. The estimated 3-year overall survival rate was 78.0 % for the PF group and 85.7 % for the TPF group (median follow-up 3.3 years). Mean docetaxel area under the curve was 3.41 µg h/mL, compared with 3.51 µg h/mL seen in adult patients.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated the feasibility of prospective randomized protocols, even for such rare tumors as pediatric NPC. Overall, there were no differences between the two treatment arms in terms of efficacy and toxicity. The pharmacokinetics of docetaxel in pediatric patients at 75 mg/m(2) was similar to those observed in adults.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of tariquidar (XR9576), a P-glycoprotein inhibitor, in combination with doxorubicin, vinorelbine, or docetaxel in children and adolescents with refractory solid tumors

PURPOSE

P-glycoprotein (Pgp), an ATP-dependent transport protein, confers multidrug resistance in cancer cells. Tariquidar binds and inhibits Pgp. To assess the toxicity, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics of tariquidar, we conducted a phase I trial of tariquidar in combination with doxorubicin, docetaxel, or vinorelbine in children and adolescents with recurrent or refractory solid tumors.

METHODS

Patients less than 19 years of age with refractory or recurrent solid tumors were eligible. Tariquidar (1, 1.5, or 2 mg/kg) was administered alone and in combination with doxorubicin, docetaxel, or vinorelbine. PK of tariquidar and cytotoxic drugs was performed. Pgp function was assessed by a rhodamine efflux assay and (99m)Tc-sestamibi scintigraphy. Tumor Pgp expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Response was assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine subjects were enrolled. No tariquidar-related dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed. DLT related to cytotoxic drugs occurred in 12 % of subjects receiving tariquidar 2 mg/kg. When administered in combination with tariquidar, the clearance of docetaxel and vinorelbine was reduced compared to prior studies. Inhibition of rhodamine efflux was dose dependent. After tariquidar administration, (99m)Tc-sestamibi accumulation in tumor increased by 22 %. Objective responses (1 complete, 2 partial) were observed. There was no association between tumor Pgp expression and response.

CONCLUSION

A tolerable and biologically active dose of tariquidar was established in children and adolescents. This trial demonstrates that modulators of resistance can be evaluated in combination with chemotherapy, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic endpoints can be useful in determination of recommended dose in children and adolescents.

Optimizing pharmacokinetic bridging studies in paediatric oncology using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modelling: application to docetaxel

AIM

Applying physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling in paediatric cancer drug development is still challenging. We aimed to demonstrate how PBPK modelling can be applied to optimize dose and sampling times for a paediatric pharmacokinetic (PK) bridging study in oncology and to compare with the allometric scaling population PK (AS-popPK) approach, using docetaxel as an example.

METHODS

A PBPK model for docetaxel was first developed for adult cancer patients using Simcyp® and subsequently used to predict its PK profiles in children by accounting for age-dependent physiological differences. Dose (mg m(-2) ) requirements for children aged 0-18 years were calculated to achieve targeted exposure in adults. Simulated data were then analyzed using population PK modelling with MONOLIX® in order to perform design optimization with the population Fisher information matrix (PFIM). In parallel, the AS-popPK approach was performed for the comparison.

RESULTS

The PBPK model developed for docetaxel adequately predicted its PK profiles in both adult and paediatric cancer patients (predicted clearance and volume of distribution within 1.5 fold of observed data). The revised dose of docetaxel for a child over 1.5 years old was higher than the adult dose. Considering clinical constraints, the optimal design contained two groups of 15 patients, having three or four sampling times and had good predicted relative standard errors (RSE<30%) for almost all parameters. The AS-popPK approach performed reasonably well but could not predict for very young children.

CONCLUSION

This research shows the clinical utility of PBPK modelling in combination with population PK modelling and optimal design to support paediatric oncology development.

Preclinical profile of cabazitaxel

First-generation taxanes have changed the treatment paradigm for a wide variety of cancers, but innate or acquired resistance frequently limits their use. Cabazitaxel is a novel second-generation taxane developed to overcome such resistance. In vitro, cabazitaxel showed similar antiproliferative activity to docetaxel in taxane-sensitive cell lines and markedly greater activity in cell lines resistant to taxanes. In vivo, cabazitaxel demonstrated excellent antitumor activity in a broad spectrum of docetaxel-sensitive tumor xenografts, including a castration-resistant prostate tumor xenograft, HID28, where cabazitaxel exhibited greater efficacy than docetaxel. Importantly, cabazitaxel was also active against tumors with innate or acquired resistance to docetaxel, suggesting therapeutic potential for patients progressing following taxane treatment and those with docetaxel-refractory tumors. In patients with tumors of the central nervous system (CNS), and in patients with pediatric tumors, therapeutic success with first-generation taxanes has been limited. Cabazitaxel demonstrated greater antitumor activity than docetaxel in xenograft models of CNS disease and pediatric tumors, suggesting potential clinical utility in these special patient populations. Based on therapeutic synergism observed in an in vivo tumor model, cabazitaxel is also being investigated clinically in combination with cisplatin. Nonclinical evaluation of the safety of cabazitaxel in a range of animal species showed largely reversible changes in the bone marrow, lymphoid system, gastrointestinal tract, and male reproductive system. Preclinical safety signals of cabazitaxel were consistent with the previously reported safety profiles of paclitaxel and docetaxel. Clinical observations with cabazitaxel were consistent with preclinical results, and cabazitaxel is indicated, in combination with prednisone, for the treatment of patients with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel. In conclusion, the demonstrated activity of cabazitaxel in tumors with innate or acquired resistance to docetaxel, CNS tumors, and pediatric tumors made this agent a candidate for further clinical evaluation in a broader range of patient populations compared with first-generation taxanes.

Efficacy of cabazitaxel in mouse models of pediatric brain tumors

BACKGROUND

There is an unmet need in the treatment of pediatric brain tumors for chemotherapy that is efficacious, avoids damage to the developing brain, and crosses the blood-brain barrier. These experiments evaluated the efficacy of cabazitaxel in mouse models of pediatric brain tumors.

METHODS

The antitumor activity of cabazitaxel and docetaxel were compared in flank and orthotopic xenograft models of patient-derived atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (ATRT), medulloblastoma, and central nervous system primitive neuroectodermal tumor (CNS-PNET). Efficacy of cabazitaxel and docetaxel were also assessed in the Smo/Smo spontaneous mouse medulloblastoma tumor model.

RESULTS

This study observed significant tumor growth inhibition in pediatric patient-derived flank xenograft tumor models of ATRT, medulloblastoma, and CNS-PNET after treatment with either cabazitaxel or docetaxel. Cabazitaxel, but not docetaxel, treatment resulted in sustained tumor growth inhibition in the ATRT and medulloblastoma flank xenograft models. Patient-derived orthotopic xenograft models of ATRT, medulloblastoma, and CNS-PNET showed significantly improved survival with treatment of cabazitaxel.

CONCLUSION

These data support further testing of cabazitaxel as a therapy for treating human pediatric brain tumors.

Can taxanes provide benefit in patients with CNS tumors and in pediatric patients with tumors? An update on the preclinical development of cabazitaxel

PURPOSE

While first-generation taxanes are valuable treatment options for many solid tumors, they are limited by an inability to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and by limited efficacy in pediatric patients. Following promising preclinical data for the next-generation taxane cabazitaxel, including activity in tumor models fully sensitive, poorly sensitive or insensitive to docetaxel, and its ability to cross the BBB, further preclinical studies of cabazitaxel relevant to these two clinical indications were performed.

METHODS

Cabazitaxel brain distribution was assessed in mice, rats and dogs. Cabazitaxel antitumor activity was assessed in mice bearing intracranial human glioblastoma (SF295; U251) xenografts, and subcutaneous cell line-derived human pediatric sarcoma (rhabdomyosarcoma RH-30; Ewing's sarcoma TC-71 and SK-ES-1) or patient-derived pediatric sarcoma (osteosarcoma DM77 and DM113; Ewing's sarcoma DM101) xenografts. The activity of cabazitaxel-cisplatin combination was evaluated in BALB/C mice bearing the syngeneic murine colon adenocarcinoma, C51.

RESULTS

Cabazitaxel penetrated rapidly in the brain, with a similar brain-blood radioactivity exposure relationship across different animal species. In intracranial human glioblastoma models, cabazitaxel demonstrated superior activity to docetaxel both at early (before BBB disruption) and at advanced stages, consistent with enhanced brain penetration. Compared with similar dose levels of docetaxel, cabazitaxel induced significantly greater tumor growth inhibition across six pediatric tumor models and more tumor regressions in five of the six models. Therapeutic synergism was observed between cisplatin and cabazitaxel, regardless of administration sequence.

CONCLUSIONS

These preclinical data suggest that cabazitaxel could be an effective therapy in CNS and pediatric tumors, supporting ongoing clinical evaluation in these indications.

Relapsed hepatoblastoma

Successful treatment of recurrent hepatoblastoma (HB) relies largely on surgical resection. When tumors are responsive, chemotherapy can be used to render patients resectable. Various chemotherapeutic regimens studied in small numbers of patients on phase I/II trials have shown few responses. The best available data indicate that doxorubicin, if not given during intial treatment, and irinotecan are the most active agents in recurrent HB. Stem cell transplantation and radiation therapy have been reported in several patients with unclear successes. Advances in therapy for relapsed patients require concentrating enrollment in one or two phase I/II trials utilizing agents with promising preclinical data.

Docetaxel in the treatment of children with refractory or relapsed hepatoblastoma

We report on the use of single-agent docetaxel (100 mg/m(2) in children >10 kg, 3.3 mg/kg in children <10 kg), given as a 1-hour infusion at 21-day intervals in 5 children with relapsed or refractory hepatoblastoma. One patient achieved complete remission of pulmonary metastases after 2 courses of docetaxel and remains well 10 years later, after completion of 13 courses of docetaxel and whole-lung radiotherapy. One patient showed a partial response to docetaxel based on α-fetoprotein measurements. Docetaxel shows some activity in progressive hepatoblastoma in this small case series and is a potential drug for future study in this disease.

A Phase II Study of Docetaxel for the Treatment of Recurrent Osteosarcoma

Purpose: To determine the response and toxicity of docetaxel in recurrent osteosarcoma and related spindle cell tumours of bone.

Patients and methods: Fourteen patients, 10 males and four females, were enrolled, median age 30.5 years (range, 17–46). Diagnosis was: conventional osteosarcoma, 12 patients; periosteal osteosarcoma, one patient; and malignant fibrous histiocytoma of bone, one patient. Initial chemotherapy had been with doxorubicin and cisplatin in 10 patients, and multiagent regimens in four. Nine had been treated with second line chemotherapy before receiving docetaxel. Thirteen patients had lung metastases and one intra-abdominal disease. Docetaxel 100 mg/mα² was given as a 1-h infusion every 3 weeks. Response was assessed every two cycles to a maximum of six.

Results: A total of 43 cycles were given, median of two per patient (range 1–6). Thirteen patients were evaluable for response. A single partial remission was seen, for a response rate of 8%. Two patients had stable disease, and one patient a mixed response. Forty cycles were evaluable for toxicity. The principle toxicity was haematological, with a median neutrophil count of 0.9 (range 0–9.6). There were four episodes of neutropenic sepsis (10%). The only non-haematological toxicity ≥grade 3 was stomatitis, occurring in just one patient. There were no toxic deaths.

Conclusion: Docetaxel at this dose and schedule is well tolerated, but is not associated with significant activity in patients with relapsed osteosarcoma.

A Phase II Study of Docetaxel in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Ewing's Tumours

Purpose. The prognosis for patients with Ewing's tumours who have metastases at presentation or who are refractory to standard chemotherapy regimens remains poor. There is therefore a need to evaluate the role of new agents. This report describes the initial results of a prospective phase II trial of docetaxel in patients with progressive or refractory Ewing's tumours.

Patients and methods. Fourteen patients with Ewing's tumours who had all relapsed or progressed after treatment with multi-drug cytotoxic therapy were treated with docetaxel 100 mg/m² infused over 1 h, three weekly for a maximum of six cycles. Nine patients received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with all cycles.

Results. A partial response was observed in one patient and stable disease in two. The remaining patients progressed on treatment. The major toxicity was myelosuppression and infection with 36% patients experiencing grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and/or infection.

Conclusion. Docetaxel appears to have some activity in Ewing's tumours even in heavily pre-treated patients. Further evaluation of its efficacy at an earlier stage of the disease is warranted.

Phase II trial of ixabepilone administered daily for five days in children and young adults with refractory solid tumors: a report from the children's oncology group

PURPOSE

Ixabepilone is a microtubule-stabilizing agent with activity in adult solid tumors and in pediatric tumor xenograft models that are resistant to paclitaxel. The maximum tolerated dose on the daily-for-5-days i.v. schedule was 6 mg/m(2)/dose in adults and 8 mg/m(2)/dose in children, and the primary dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was neutropenia. This study aimed to determine the response rate to ixabepilone in six solid tumor strata in children and young adults.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We conducted a phase II trial of ixabepilone (8 mg/m(2)/dose for 5 days every 21 days) using a two-stage design in taxane-naïve children and young adults with treatment-refractory, measurable rhabdomyosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma family tumors, osteosarcoma, synovial sarcoma, or malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, neuroblastoma, and Wilms tumor.

RESULTS

Sixty-one eligible patients (36 male) were enrolled. Median (range) age was 13 years (range, 3-36). Fifty-nine patients were fully evaluable for toxicity and response. DLTs, most commonly myelosuppression, occurred in 11 patients (15% incidence in 3-18 years old and 33% in 19-36 years old; P = 0.2) during cycle 1. The median (range) number of cycles was 2 (range, 1-38). No partial or complete responses (response evaluation criteria in solid tumors) were observed. Seven patients received >or=3 cycles, and two had prolonged stable disease (Wilms' tumor, 38 cycles; synovial sarcoma, 8 cycles).

CONCLUSIONS

Ixabepilone at 8 mg/m(2)/dose daily for 5 days was tolerable in children and adolescents, but did not show evidence of clinical activity in the childhood solid tumors studied.

Treatment of relapsed/refractory pediatric sarcomas with gemcitabine and docetaxel

AIM OF THE STUDY

In this report we describe experience with gemcitabine-docetaxel in pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory sarcomas.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ten relapsed/refractory pediatric sarcoma patients including 6 Ewing sarcoma, 2 synovial sarcoma, 1 osteosarcoma, and 1 undifferentiated sarcoma, were treated prospectively, in an outpatient setting, with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m over 90 minutes on day 1 and 8, and docetaxel 100 mg/m over 2 to 4 hours on day 8 of a 21-day cycle, as an investigational rescue therapy.

RESULTS

The patients (ages 4 to 18) received a total of 70 cycles of therapy (median 6 cycles; range: 4 to 10 y). All symptomatic patients responded clinically to the new regimen. By Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria, 4 (40%) patients had a complete response (CR), 1 (10%) had a partial response (PR), 3 (30%) had stable disease (SD), and 2 (20%) had a progressive disease (PD), which provides an objective response rate (CR+PR) of 50%. Median duration of response (CR+PR+SD) was 10 months (range: 6 to 32+ mo). Five out of the 10 patients (50%) are alive, with a median follow-up of 48 months from diagnosis. Mild toxicities (no grades 3 to 4) were encountered and managed in the ambulatory setting.

CONCLUSIONS

The gemcitabine-docetaxel regimen demonstrated antitumor activity against advanced pediatric (mainly Ewing) sarcomas, allowing for good quality of life. Evaluation in a large, formal phase 2 trials for Ewing patients is ongoing.

Phase I trial and pharmacokinetic study of ixabepilone administered daily for 5 days in children and adolescents with refractory solid tumors

PURPOSE

The objectives of this phase I trial were to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity profile, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), pharmacokinetics, and preliminary response rate for ixabepilone, a microtubule-stabilizing agent, administered intravenously daily for 5 days in children and adolescents.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients >or= 2 and <or= 18 years with relapsed or refractory solid tumors were enrolled onto sequential cohorts to the following five dose levels: 3.0 (n = 3), 4.5 (n = 4), 6.0 (n = 3), 8.0 (n = 6), and 10 (n = 3) mg/m(2)/d. Eligibility criteria, dose levels, definitions of DLT and MTD, and pharmacokinetic sampling times were designed to be as similar as possible to the adult phase I trial of ixabepilone on the same schedule.

RESULTS

Nineteen children (median age, 10 years; range, 2 to 18 years) were enrolled, and 18 (12 with sarcomas) were assessable for toxicity. DLTs (grade 4 neutropenia for > 5 days and grade 3 fatigue) were observed in two of three patients receiving 10 mg/m(2)/d. The MTD of ixabepilone administered daily for 5 days every 21 days was 8 mg/m(2)/d. Myelosuppression, GI, and hepatic toxicities were common non-DLTs. Peripheral neuropathy was uncommon. Ixabepilone clearance was 475 +/- 247 mL/min/m(2), volume of distribution at steady-state was 12.2 +/- 5.4 L/kg, and half-life was 14 hours.

CONCLUSION

The recommended dose of ixabepilone for phase II trials in solid tumors is 8 mg/m(2)/d daily for 5 days every 21 days. This dose is 33% higher than the MTD in adults receiving the same dosing schedule. Pharmacokinetic parameters in children and adolescents were highly variable but similar to adults.

Characteristics and outcome of pediatric patients enrolled in phase I oncology trials

PURPOSE

To describe the characteristics of pediatric subjects who enroll in phase I trials, to determine the associations between pre-enrollment characteristics and the risk for toxicity, and to analyze response and survival outcomes.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Pre-enrollment characteristics and study outcomes were retrospectively analyzed for children with refractory solid tumors treated in one of 16 phase I trials with similar eligibility criteria at the National Cancer Institute between 1992 and 2005.

RESULTS

The 262 subjects analyzed had received a median of two (range, 0-9) prior chemotherapy regimens, and were on one (range, 0-12) concomitant medication. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status scores for subjects were 0 (29%), 1 (48%), and 2 (19%); 19% had received a prior stem cell transplantation and 73% had received prior radiation. Approximately 90% of subjects were evaluable for the primary trial endpoints (toxicity and pharmacokinetics). Seventeen percent of subjects experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), 5% discontinued the study drug because of toxicity, and a drug-related death occurred in one subject (0.4%). Variables associated with a higher risk for developing a DLT, by multiple logistic regression analysis, were drug dose and prior radiation, for myelosuppressive agents, and drug dose and performance status, for nonmyelosuppressive agents. The complete and partial response rate was 4%; however, 17% of subjects had stable disease (received three or more cycles). The median overall survival time from the time of enrollment was five months.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary trial objectives are achieved in approximately 90% of subjects with the standard phase I trial design and eligibility criteria despite the intensification of frontline and salvage therapies in pediatric subjects with cancer.

Combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel in the treatment of children and young adults with refractory bone sarcoma

BACKGROUND

The combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel has demonstrated promise in sarcomas diagnosed in adults. In the current study, the toxicity and efficacy of this combination were evaluated in pediatric sarcomas.

METHODS

A retrospective case review of 22 patients with recurrent or refractory bone or soft-tissue sarcomas who received gemcitabine (at a dose of 675 mg/m(2) intravenously on Days 1 and 8) and docetaxel (at a dose of 75-100 mg/m(2) intravenously on Day 8) was undertaken.

RESULTS

The patients (ages 8-23 years) received a total of 109 courses of chemotherapy (median, 4 courses; range, 1-13 courses). Seventeen patients had osteosarcoma, 2 patients had Ewing sarcoma family of tumors (ESFT), 1 patient had a malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH), 1 patient had a chondrosarcoma, and 1 patient had an undifferentiated sarcoma. Of the 14 patients evaluable for response, the patient with an MFH achieved a complete response (CR), 3 patients with osteosarcoma achieved a partial response (PR), and 2 patients (1 with ESFT and 1 with osteosarcoma) had stable disease (SD). The overall objective response (CR + PR) rate was 29%. Median duration of response (CR + PR + SD) was 4.8 months (range, 1.6-13 months). The toxicity was manageable and consisted primarily of thrombocytopenia and neutropenia.

CONCLUSIONS

In the current study, gemcitabine in combination with docetaxel was found to be well tolerated and demonstrated antitumor activity in children and adolescents with recurrent or refractory osteosarcoma and MFH. Further evaluation of this drug combination is warranted in these patients.

Phase 2 study of docetaxel in the treatment of childhood refractory acute leukemias: a Children's Oncology Group report

BACKGROUND

To determine the response rate and toxicity of docetaxel when administered as a 60 mg/m(2) dose by 1 hr intravenous (IV) infusion weekly x 3 weeks in children with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

PROCEDURE

Patients who were under the age of 22-year-old at the time of the original ALL or AML diagnosis and in a second relapse were accrued from August 2002 to May 2005 for this Children's Oncology Group (COG) phase 2 study (ADVL0023). Ten patients with ALL and two patients with AML were enrolled.

RESULTS

There were no complete or partial responses observed. The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities were hematologic followed by febrile neutropenia. One patient developed a dose limiting elevation in serum bilirubin, but no other significant hepatotoxicity was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Docetaxel was not effective therapy for children with relapsed ALL at the dose and schedule tested.

New drugs for the treatment of metastatic or refractory soft tissue sarcomas in children

Children with relapsed, recurrent or metastatic sarcomas represent a therapeutic challenge for the pediatric oncologist. Strategies for the development of newer therapies for children with these sarcomas have, in the past, been histology-specific. For example, drug development in rhabdomyosarcoma has relied upon the preclinical xenograft model, whereas therapies for pediatric nonrhabdomyosarcomatous soft tissue sarcomas have mostly been derived from adult trials. The progress to date and the tools used in the treatment of advanced pediatric sarcomas will be summarized in this review.

A Phase 1 Study of ABT-751, an Orally Bioavailable Tubulin Inhibitor, Administered Daily for 7 Days Every 21 Days in Pediatric Patients with Solid Tumors

PURPOSE

To determine the toxicity profile, dose-limiting toxicities, and maximum tolerated dose of ABT-751 administered orally once daily for 7 days, repeated every 21 days.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients who were </=18 years of age, with relapsed or refractory solid tumors, and who were able to swallow capsules were eligible. The starting dose was 100 mg/m(2)/d (n = 3) and was escalated to 130 mg/m(2)/d (n = 6), 165 mg/m(2)/d (n = 6), 200 mg/m(2)/d (n = 6), and 250 mg/m(2)/d (n = 2) in cohorts of three to six patients. The maximum tolerated dose was determined from dose-limiting toxicities occurring during the first treatment cycle.

RESULTS

Twenty-four children (median age, 13 years; range, 4-18 years) were enrolled; 23 were evaluable for toxicity. Diagnoses included neuroblastoma (n = 8), sarcomas (n = 8), primary brain tumors (n = 2), Wilms' tumor (n = 2), and other solid tumors (n = 3). Dose-limiting toxicities (grade 3 sensory and motor neuropathy, grade 3 hypertension, and grade 3 fatigue) were observed in patients enrolled at the 250 mg/m(2)/d dose level. The maximum tolerated dose of ABT-751 administered daily for 7 days every 21 days was 200 mg/m(2)/d. Non-dose-limiting toxicities at the maximum tolerated dose included anemia, fatigue, peripheral sensory neuropathy, abdominal pain, nausea, constipation, anorexia, fever, and weight loss. Myelosuppression was minimal at the maximum tolerated dose. The median number of cycles administered is 2 (range, 1-50). No significant ABT-751-related cumulative toxicities were observed.

CONCLUSION

ABT-751 is well tolerated in children. The recommended dose for phase 2 trials in solid tumors is 200 mg/m(2)/d administered orally, daily for 7 days every 21 days. This dose is >40% higher than the maximum tolerated dose in adults receiving the same dosing schedule.

Phase II investigation of docetaxel in pediatric patients with recurrent solid tumors: a report from the Children's Oncology Group

BACKGROUND

Docetaxel, which is an antitubulin agent, has demonstrable activity against murine and human tumors. The current study was designed to determine response rates to docetaxel in various strata of recurrent solid tumors of childhood and to assess toxicity in a group of patients who were assigned to receive it.

METHODS

Docetaxel was given at a dose of 125 mg/m2 once every 21 days as a 1-hour intravenous infusion for a maximum of 12 courses. From January 1997 to November 2001, 109 male patients and 68 female patients (total, 177 patients) were enrolled, and 173 patients were eligible. The median patient age at entry was 13 years (range, 1-27 yrs). One hundred sixty patients were evaluable for response.

RESULTS

There were no deaths attributable to study drug. Hematologic toxicity was common during therapy. Dermatologic, neurologic, pulmonary, and infectious side effects as well as edema were significant. One patient each had acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoid leukemia, and high-grade glioma reported as secondary malignancies. One patient with osteosarcoma and 1 patient with rhabdomyosarcoma achieved a complete response. Partial responses were observed in patients with Ewing sarcoma (3 patients), osteosarcoma (1 patient), squamous cell carcinoma (1 patient), and medulloblastoma (1 patient). Seventeen patients had stable disease. The 1-year and 5-year overall survival rates for the 160 evaluable patients were 24% (standard error = 4%) and 6% (standard error = 2%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Docetaxel demonstrated activity in patients with recurrent Ewing sarcoma but was found to be ineffective for treating the other types of recurrent solid tumors that were studied.

Taxanes in paediatric oncology: And now?

Taxanes are a group of anticancer agents that target microtubules, promote their assembly, and stabilize them. The resulting effects are mitotic blockage and induction of apoptosis, whose mechanism of initiation remains to be fully determined. Among adults, taxanes are one of the most powerful and most commonly used anticancer drugs. They show a wide range of activity in malignancies such as breast, ovarian, and lung cancers. In paediatric oncology, pre-clinical and clinical data are quite limited. Six phase I studies, two phase II, and rare case reports have been published. This review will focus on the paediatric pre-clinical and clinical findings with taxanes. Based on data from the literature, we will try to explain the results and foresee the possible use of taxanes in paediatric oncology. Indeed, three main advances have been made regarding taxanes: (1) Increased efficacy when used in multidrug-based chemotherapy regimen. (2) New administration schedules based on anti-angiogenic properties when given at daily very low doses. (3) Development of new taxanes with decreased recognition by Pgp, the product of the MDR1 gene. Thus, although the initial experience with taxanes in paediatric oncology has been disappointing, it may be too early to leave out taxanes and we should further investigate their use among children with cancer.

In vivo evaluation of ixabepilone (BMS247550), a novel epothilone B derivative, against pediatric cancer models

PURPOSE

Vinca alkaloids, agents that cause depolymerization of microtubules, are highly active in treatment of many pediatric cancers. In contrast, taxanes, agents that stabilize microtubules, are far less effective against the same cancer types. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the antitumor activity of ixabepilone, an epothilone B derivative representing a new class of microtubule-stabilizing antimitotic agent in a wide variety of pediatric solid tumor models.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Ixabepilone was administered i.v. every 4 days for three doses to scid mice bearing s.c. human rhabdomyosarcoma (three lines), neuroblastoma (four), Wilms' tumors (six), osteosarcoma (four), or brain tumors (seven). Tumor diameters were measured weekly, and tumor growth or regressions were determined. Pharmacokinetic studies were done following a single administration of drug at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) level (10 mg/kg).

RESULTS

At the MTD (10 mg/kg), ixabepilone induced objective responses (all tumors in a group achieved > or = 50% volume regression) in three of three rhabdomyosarcoma lines, three of five neuroblastomas, six of seven Wilms' tumor models, two of six osteosarcoma, and four of eight brain tumor models. However, the dose-response curve was steep with only 2 of 19 tumors models regressing (> or = 50%) at 4.4 mg/kg. In comparison, paclitaxel administered at the MTD on the same schedule failed to induce objective regressions of three tumor lines that were highly sensitive to treatment with ixabepilone. Pharmacokinetics following single i.v. administration of ixabepilone at its MTD (10 mg/kg) were biexponential with C(max) of 12.5 micromol/L, elimination half-life of 19.2 hours, and total area under the curve of 5.8 micromol/L-h. The achieved drug exposure of ixabepilone at this efficacious MTD dose level in mice is similar to those achieved in patients given the recommended phase II dose of 40 mg/m2 by either 1- or 3-hour infusion every 3 weeks, a regimen that has shown significant anticancer activity in phase II clinical trials in adult patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Administered at doses ranging from 66% to 100% of its MTD in mice, the epothilone B derivative ixabepilone shows broad spectrum activity against a panel of pediatric tumor xenograft models. Pharmacokinetic analysis indicates that the systemic ixabepilone exposure achieved in mice at its MTD is similar to that achieved in patients at the recommended phase II dose of 40 mg/m2 administered every 3 weeks. Importantly, the present results showed a clear distinction in sensitivity of pediatric solid tumors to this epothilone derivative compared with paclitaxel.

Pediatric Phase I Trials in Oncology: An Analysis of Study Conduct Efficiency

Purpose

To determine the efficacy and safety of pediatric phase I oncology trials in the era of dose-intensive chemotherapy and to analyze how efficiently these trials are conducted.

Methods

Phase I pediatric oncology trials published from 1990 to 2004 and their corresponding adult phase I trials were reviewed. Dose escalation schemes using fixed 30% dose increments were studied to theoretically determine whether trials could be completed utilizing fewer patients and dose levels.

Results

Sixty-nine pediatric phase I oncology trials enrolling 1,973 patients were identified. The pediatric maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was strongly correlated with the adult MTD (r = 0.97). For three-fourths of the trials, the pediatric and adult MTD differed by no more than 30%, and for more than 85% of the trials, the pediatric MTD was less than or equal to 1.6 times the adult MTD. The median number of dose levels studied was four (range, two to 13). The overall objective response rate was 9.6%, the likelihood of experiencing a dose-limiting toxicity was 24%, and toxic death rate was 0.5%.

Conclusion

Despite the strong correlation between the adult and pediatric MTDs, more than four dose levels were studied in 40% of trials. There appeared to be little value in exploring dose levels greater than 1.6 times the adult MTD. Limiting pediatric phase I trials to a maximum of four doses levels would significantly shorten the timeline for study conduct without compromising safety.

Survival After Recurrence of Ewing’s Sarcoma Family of Tumors

Purpose

The overall survival (OS) of patients with relapsed Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors (ESFT) is poor, and the relative benefit of high-dose therapy (HDT) is controversial.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively identified 55 consecutive ESFT patients with adequate medical records for review, who were treated at Children’s Hospital and Regional Medical Center and who developed disease recurrence between January 1, 1985 and December 31, 2002.

Results

The median relapse-free interval (RFI) from diagnosis to first recurrence was 17 months (range, 5 to 90 months). Most recurrences were metastatic only (39 patients) or local and metastatic (10 patients). Twenty-seven patients (49%) achieved a partial or complete response to second-line treatment, with a median duration of response of 27 months (range, 5 to 119+ months). The 5-year OS rate for all relapsed patients was 23% (95% CI, 11% to 35%). By univariate analysis, improved OS was associated with response to second-line treatment versus no response (46% v 0%, respectively; P < .0001), RFI ≥ 24 months versus less than 24 months (48% v 12%, respectively; P = .0001), and no metastases at initial diagnosis versus presence of metastases (31% v 12%, respectively; P = .05). Because all 13 patients who received HDT also had responsive relapse, we performed a multivariate analysis. Reduced risk of death was associated with response to second-line therapy (relative risk, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.40), RFI ≥ 24 months (relative risk, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.66), and receiving HDT (relative risk, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.85).

Conclusion

HDT as consolidation therapy for relapsed ESFT seems to be associated with improved OS, even after adjusting for RFI and response to second-line treatment.

Phase I trial of rebeccamycin analog (NSC #655649) in children with refractory solid tumors: a pediatric oncology group study

PURPOSE

To conduct a phase 1 trial of rebeccamycin analog (NSC #655649) in children with solid tumors to establish the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum-tolerated dose (MTD); to establish the pharmacokinetic profile in children, and to document any evidence of antitumor activity.

METHODS

A 1-hour infusion of NSC #655649 was administered every 21 days to 17 patients younger than 21 years who had malignant tumors refractory to conventional therapy. Doses ranged from 450 mg/m2 to 760 mg/m2. Pharmacokinetics were done in at least three patients per dose level. The first course was used to determine DLT and MTD.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients on three dose levels were assessable for toxicities. At 760 mg/m2, four patients had dose-limiting neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Pharmacokinetics were assessable in 13 patients. Plasma concentrations declined triexponentially and concentrations above the range of in vitro antitumor activity were maintained for 3 days. Analysis of urine extracts revealed the presence of an N-de-ethylated metabolite and probable involvement of cytochrome P450 isoenzyme(s) in the metabolism of NSC #655649. Pharmacodynamic studies showed a relationship between the area under the curve and percentage change in absolute neutrophil count in the E(max) model (r2 = 0.56, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended phase 2 dose of NSC #655649 administered as a 1-hour infusion every 21 days to children with solid tumors is 585 mg/m2. Both neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were found to be dose-limiting toxicities.

A phase I dose-escalation study of docetaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in patients with solid tumours

BACKGROUND

Docetaxel is a widely active cytotoxic agent. The principal dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the 3-weekly regimen are neutropenia and febrile neutropenia. Use of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) may allow higher doses of docetaxel to be administered with potentially greater anticancer efficacy. The objectives of this study were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicity profile of docetaxel given with G-CSF support.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had solid tumours and were aged 18-75 years with a WHO performance status of up to 2. Strict criteria for liver function were followed. Patients may have received one previous regimen of chemotherapy in addition to adjuvant chemotherapy. Cohorts of three to six patients received docetaxel over 60-90 min every 3 weeks, commencing at 110 mg/m(2) and escalating at 10 mg/m(2) increments. Patients also received G-CSF 5 micro g/kg/day until neutrophil recovery. A 3-day corticosteroid prophylaxis was given.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients with median age 55 years (range 29-75) were included. Fourteen (48%) had previously received chemotherapy. At the 170 mg/m(2) dose level (the MTD), two of three patients had DLTs and 160 mg/m(2) was determined to be the recommended dose. The principal DLTs were skin and neurosensory toxicity. Asthenia was frequent, especially at dose levels >/=140 mg/m(2). Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in only 10 patients (35%) and was not dose related, with febrile neutropenia in three patients (10%).

CONCLUSIONS

Docetaxel may be escalated considerably above standard doses when administered with G-CSF support. The recommended dose for phase II studies is 160 mg/m(2). With escalated-dose docetaxel, DLTs were non-haematological and qualitatively similar to the toxicity profile at standard doses.

Growth-inhibiting effects of intralesional docetaxel and paclitaxel on an experimental model of malignant neuroectodermal tumor

Taxoids are effective agents against a wide variety of tumors, but their effectiveness on neuroectodermal tumors is not well-known. For this reason we have carried out an experimental study on the effect of intratumoral administration of docetaxel (DC) and paclitaxel (PC) on tumor growth, using a murine model of malignant neuroectodermal tumor. The results showed a delay in tumor growth in animals treated with PC compared with controls (dose of 5 mg/kg, three times per week every other day, forming a cycle; three cycles were completed with a break of a week between each cycle). The total dose administered to each animal was 45 mg/kg. When DC was administered, the results showed distinct tumor growth inhibition and tumor regression in 80% of animals (intratumoral administration at a dose of 5 mg/kg, three times per week every other day forming a cycle; three cycles were completed with a break of a week between each cycle). The total dose administered to each animal was 20 mg/kg. These results suggest the utility of taxoids, mainly DC, by intralesional administration, on malignant tumors of the nervous system.

Evaluation of chemotherapy response in pediatric bone sarcomas by [F-18]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography

BACKGROUND

Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a significant prognostic factor for osteosarcoma (OS) and the Ewing sarcoma family of tumors (ESFT). Conventional radiographic imaging does not discriminate between responding and nonresponding osseous tumors. [F-18]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) is a noninvasive imaging modality that accurately predicts histopathologic response in patients with various malignancies. To describe the FDG PET imaging characteristics and to determine the correlation between FDG PET imaging and chemotherapy response in children with bone sarcomas, we reviewed our single institution experience.

METHODS

Thirty-three pediatric patients with OS or ESFT with osseous primary sites were evaluated by FDG PET. All patients received standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy. FDG PET standard uptake values before (SUV1) and after (SUV2) chemotherapy were analyzed and correlated with chemotherapy response assessed by histopathology in surgically excised tumors. Twenty-six patients had SUV1, SUV2, and surgical excision.

RESULTS

Although the mean SUV1 in children with OS or ESFT were similar (8.2. vs. 5.3, P = 0.13), mean SUV2 for OS patients was greater than the values for ESFT patients (3.3 vs. 1.5, P = 0.01). All ESFT patients and 28% of OS patients had a favorable histologic response to chemotherapy (>or= 90% necrosis). Combining ESFT and OS patients, both SUV2 and the ratio of SUV2 to SUV1 (SUV2:SUV1) were correlated with histologic response (P = 0.01 for both comparisons).

CONCLUSION

FDG PET evaluation of pediatric bone sarcomas demonstrated significant alteration in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. SUV2 and SUV2:SUV1 correlated with histopathologic assessment of response and potentially could be used as a noninvasive surrogate to predict response in patients.

Ewing tumour: incidence, prognosis and treatment options

Ewing tumours, i.e. Ewing's sarcoma and malignant peripheral neuroectodermal tumours, are the second most common primary malignant tumours of bone in childhood and adolescence, with an annual incidence rate in Caucasians of 3 per 1 million children <15 years of age. Histopathologically small blue round cell tumours, Ewing tumours show a typical chromosomal rearrangement in >95% of cases linking the EWS gene on chromosome 22q12 to a member of the ETS transcription gene family, most commonly to Fli-1 on 11q24. This fusion contributes to the malignant potential of Ewing tumour cells, indeed antisense oligonucleotides may prevent tumour growth in vitro. After open biopsy, and histological and possibly molecular biological confirmation of the diagnosis, treatment consists of several months of multidrug cytostatic therapy and local therapy. Both surgery and radiotherapy may control local disease, but without consequent cytostatic chemotherapy all patients will eventually succumb to distant metastases. With the use of alkylating agents including doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and/or ifosfamide, and other cytostatic drugs such as actinomycin D (dactinomycin), vincristine and etoposide, long-term survival can be achieved in >50% of patients with localised disease. Patients with clinically detectable metastases at diagnosis, patients not responding to therapy and patients with disease relapse have a significantly poorer prognosis. Maximum supportive care and local therapy managed by an experienced physician are required in all patients, and inclusion of high-risk patients in phase I and II studies is warranted. Hence, treatment of patients with Ewing tumours should be performed in experienced centres only and preferably within controlled clinical trials.

A phase I study of cranial radiation therapy with concomitant continuous infusion paclitaxel in children with brain tumors

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of children with high-grade astrocytomas of the central nervous system is grim and has not been substantially improved by conventional chemoradiotherapy. We performed a multi-institutional phase I study to determine the toxicities and tolerance of concurrent external beam radiation of the brain and a unique dose-schedule of paclitaxel as a radiation sensitizer.

PROCEDURE

Paclitaxel was delivered intravenously as a continuous 24 h/day, 7 days/week infusion during the entire 6-week course of fixed schedule standard radiation therapy. The dose of paclitaxel was escalated in patient cohorts in standard phase I design.

RESULTS

Eleven patients (eight brain stem gliomas, one glioblastoma multiforme, and two gliomatosis cerebri) were treated. Dose-limiting toxicity was encountered in the two patients treated at 6 mg/(m(2)/24 h), both of whom developed severe obstipation requiring prolonged hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

We have shown in this first study of its kind that paclitaxel can be administered safely to children as a 6-week continuous infusion concurrent with cranial irradiation. The maximally tolerated and recommended phase II dose is 4 mg/(m(2)/day). The benefits of taxanes as clinical radiation sensitizers for children with high-grade gliomas, if any, remain to be determined.

Developmental therapeutics in childhood cancer. A perspective from the Children's Oncology Group and the US Food and Drug Administration

Drug development in pediatric oncology has been reviewed, concentrating on overall development issues and COG studies of cytotoxic compounds. A variety of interesting molecules with more specific targeting are becoming available. The challenges that remain include the availability of such compounds for pediatric trial and their study in a timely fashion, and the subsequent incorporation of the new agents into more up-front regimens, with the ultimate shared goal of curing more children with less toxicity.

A phase I study of nolatrexed dihydrochloride in children with advanced cancer. A United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group Investigation

A phase I study of nolatrexed, administered as a continuous 5 day intravenous infusion every 28 days, has been undertaken for children with advanced malignancy. 16 patients were treated at 3 dose levels; 420, 640 and 768 mg/m(2)24 h(-1). 8 patients were evaluable for toxicity. In the 6 patients treated at 768 mg/m(2)24 h(-1), dose-limiting oral mucositis and myelosuppression were observed. Plasma nolatrexed concentrations and systemic exposure, measured in 14 patients, were dose related, with mean AUC values of 36 mg(-1)ml(-1)min(-1), 50 mg ml(-1)min(-1)and 80 mg ml(-1)min(-1)at the 3 dose levels studied. Whereas no toxicity was encountered if the nolatrexed AUC was <45 mg ml(-1)min(-1), Grade 3 or 4 toxicity was observed with AUC values of >60 mg ml(-1)min(-1). Elevated plasma deoxyuridine levels, measured as a surrogate marker of thymidylate synthase inhibition, were seen at all of the dose levels studied. One patient with a spinal primitive neuroectodermal tumour had stable disease for 11 cycles of therapy, and in two patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia a short-lived 50% reduction in peripheral lymphoblast counts was observed. Nolatrexed can be safely administered to children with cancer, and there is evidence of therapeutic activity as well as antiproliferative toxicity. Phase II studies of nolatrexed in children at the maximum tolerated dose of 640 mg/m(2)24 h(-1)are warranted.

Phase I trials in pediatric oncology: perceptions of pediatricians from the United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group and the Pediatric Oncology Group

PURPOSE

To identify areas of concern regarding the conduct of phase I trials, the perceived expectations and motivations of the parents of children entered, the expectations of toxicity and benefit, and the ethical concerns of pediatric hematologists and oncologists in the United Kingdom and North America.

METHODS

A survey instrument consisting of 19 open- and closed-ended questions was sent to United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group (UKCCSG)- and Pediatric Oncology Group (POG)-affiliated pediatricians.

RESULTS

Fifty-three UKCCSG- and 78 POG-affiliated pediatricians responded. Thirty-two UKCCSG and 51 POG respondents had previously entered at least one child into a phase I study. Overall, respondents believed that parents entered their children for medical benefit, altruism, and hope of cure. Although many respondents believed that children could benefit from medical improvement, feelings of altruism, and maintenance of hope, the chance of cure or complete remission was thought to be small. Similarly, parents were thought to potentially benefit through altruism and maintenance of hope. Whereas 83% of UKCCSG respondents indicated that phase I trials were associated with ethical difficulties, this was a concern for 48% of POG respondents. The main ethical concerns of respondents were risk of toxicity, consent of the child, unrealistic hope, and coercion.

CONCLUSION

The respondents in this survey expressed mainly ethical concerns regarding the conduct of phase I trials and had realistic expectations of the potential for toxicity and benefit for those children who participate in these studies.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of docetaxel

Docetaxel (Taxotere), a semi-synthetic analog of paclitaxel (Taxol), is a promoter of microtubule polymerization leading to cell cycle arrest at G2/M, apoptosis and cytotoxicity. Docetaxel has significant activity in breast, non-small-cell lung, ovarian and head and neck cancers. Docetaxel has undergone phase I study in a number of schedules, including different infusion durations and various treatment cycles. Doses studied in adults have ranged from 5 to 145 mg/m2 and those in children from 55 to 235 mg/m2. The most frequently used regimen in adults is 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. A 1-hour infusion every 3 weeks has been favoured in phase II and III studies, and the disposition of docetaxel after such treatment is best described by a 3 compartment model with alpha, beta and gamma half-lives of 4.5 minutes, 38.3 minutes and 12.2 hours, respectively. The disposition of docetaxel appears to be linear, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) increasing proportionately with dose. Docetaxel is widely distributed in tissues with a mean volume of distribution of 74 L/m2 after 100 mg/m2, every 3 weeks. The mean total body clearance after this schedule is approximately 22 L/h/m2, principally because of hepatic metabolism by the cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4 system and biliary excretion into the faeces. Renal excretion is minimal (< 5%). Docetaxel is > 90% bound in plasma. Population pharmacokinetic studies of docetaxel have demonstrated that clearance is significantly decreased with age, decreased body surface area, increased concentrations of alpha 1-acid glycoproteinand albumin. Importantly, patients with elevated plasma levels of bilirubin and/or transaminases have a 12 to 27% decrease in docetaxel clearance and should receive reduced doses. Although docetaxel is metabolised by CYP3A4, phase I combination studies have not shown major evidence of significant interaction between docetaxel and other drugs metabolised by the same pathway. Nevertheless, care should be taken with the use of known CYP3A4 inhibitors such as erythromycin, ketoconazole and cyclosporin. Conversely, increased doses may be required for patients receiving therapy known to induce this cytochrome (e.g. anticonvulsants). Perliminary data suggest the erythromycin breath test, an indicator of CYP3A4 function, is a predictor of toxicity after treatment with docetaxel. Such methodologies may eventually enable clinicians to individualise doses of docetaxel for patients with cancer.

[Docetaxel in treatment of other solid tumors]

PHASE-II-STUDIES: Docetaxel (Taxotere; Rhône-Poulenc Rorer) was evaluated in the treatment of a wide range of tumors in the early nineties. This overview relates mainly to the results of 32 phase-II-studies from Europe, North America and Japan including the following malignancies: head and neck cancer, cancer of the ovary and cervix uterus, soft tissue sarcomas, gastrointestinal cancers, renal and transitional cell cancer as well as melanoma and glioma. Results of recent studies also revealed a high activity of combination chemotherapy with cisplatinum in untreated head and neck cancer as well as ovarian cancer.

RESULTS

A remarkable single agent activity was observed in the palliative treatment after recurrence of head and neck tumors (ORR 27 to 42%) and as salvage chemotherapy after failure of platinum compounds in ovarian cancer, where Docetaxel appeared to be similarly active as Paclitaxel and Topotecan. Remarkable activity was also observed in the treatment of gastric, pancreatic and urothelial cancer as well as melanoma.

CONCLUSION

Docetaxel ist a new cytotoxic drug with a broad range of activity in various solid tumors. The place of this compound in relation to established regimens and its value its value in combination chemotherapy warrants further investigation.