Docetaxel: standard recommended dose of 100 mg/m(2) is effective but not feasible for some metastatic breast cancer patients heavily pretreated with chemotherapy-A phase II single-center study

Quantification of Docetaxel in Serum Using Turbulent Flow Liquid Chromatography Electrospray Tandem Mass Spectrometry (TFC-HPLC-ESI-MS/MS)

Docetaxel is a second-generation taxane and is used clinically as an anti-neoplastic agent in cancer chemotherapy via an anti-mitotic mechanism. Its efficacy is limited to a narrow therapeutic window. Inappropriately high concentrations may cause erythema, fluid retention, nausea, diarrhea, and neutropenia. As a result, dosing recommendations have changed from high dosage loading every 3 weeks to lower dosage loading weekly. We describe a method that can be used for therapeutic drug monitoring of docetaxel levels using turbulent flow liquid chromatography electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (TFC-HPLC-ESI-MS/MS). The method is rapid, requiring only 6.3 min per analytical run following a simple protein crash. The method requires only 100 μL of serum. Concentrations of docetaxel were quantified by a calibration curve relating the peak-area ratio of docetaxel to a deuterated internal standard (docetaxel-D9). The method was linear from 7.8 to 1000 ng/mL, with imprecision ≤6.2 %.

Docetaxel in hepatic impairment

Purpose. The primary objective of this paper is to provide a brief overview of docetaxel pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, indications, and drug interactions, concentrating on their relationship with docetaxel use in patients with hepatic impairment.

Data Sources. The literature was reviewed through a MEDLINE search from 1986 to 2000. Relevant articles cited in literature obtained by MEDLINE searching were also considered. The following terms were searched: hepatic impairment, liver failure, Taxotere, and docetaxel. The search was restricted to the English language.

Data Extraction. The current literature is reviewed in regard to docetaxel pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, dosing, efficacy, adverse effects, and drug interactions and with a special emphasis on docetaxel use in patients with hepatic impairment.

Data Synthesis. Docetaxel has a wide spectrum of clinical activity and is used frequently in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, NSCLC, ovarian cancer and cancer of the head and neck. The dose-limiting toxicity of docetaxel is neutropenia. Docetaxel is metabolized in the liver and elevations in hepatic enzymes can predict a reduced clearance of docetaxel, which is associated with an increased incidence of neutropenia. Based on population pharmacokinetic modeling, docetaxel can be safely administered in patients with elevated hepatic enzymes if the dose is reduced on the first cycle.

A first in man phase I trial of the oral immunomodulator, indoximod, combined with docetaxel in patients with metastatic solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) is an enzyme that tumors use to create a state of immunosuppression. Indoximod is an IDO pathway inhibitor. Preclinical studies demonstrated that indoximod combined with chemotherapy was synergistic in a mouse model of breast cancer. A phase I 3+3 trial was designed to study the combination of docetaxel and indoximod.

METHODS

Docetaxel was administered at 60 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks dose levels 1-4 and 75 mg/m2 for dose level 5. Indoximod was given at 300, 600, 1000, 2000, and 1200 mg PO twice daily continuously for levels 1-5, respectively. Serum drug levels were measured.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients were treated, with 22 evaluable for response. DLTs included grade 3 dehydration (level 1), hypotension(level 4), mucositis (level 4) and grade 5 enterocolitis (level 2). Dose level 5 is the recommended phase II dose. The most frequent adverse events were fatigue (58.6%), anemia (51.7%), hyperglycemia (48.3%), infection (44.8%), and nausea (41.4%). There were 4 partial responses (2 breast, 1 NSCLC, 1 thymic tumor). No drug-drug interactions were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Docetaxel plus indoximod was well tolerated with no increase in expected toxicities or pharmacokinetic interactions. It was active in a pretreated population of patients with metastatic solid tumors.

Pharmacokinetics, dynamics and toxicity of docetaxel: Why the Japanese dose differs from the Western dose

Docetaxel (Taxotere®) has been one of the most important chemotherapeutic drugs for cancer treatment since 1996. Although a large number of clinical studies have been conducted in various cancer fields, there is a discrepancy in the standard dose between Japan and Western countries. This article reviews the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and toxicological profiles of docetaxel, and explains why there exists an ethnic difference in dose, and further discusses which direction we should go forward to solve this problem. The original recommended dose was 100 mg/m² every 3 weeks in US and European populations, while a Japanese phase I study suggested the recommended dose as 60 mg/m² every 3 weeks. A prospective population pharmacokinetic analysis of docetaxel conducted in both the USA/Europe and Japan, indicated an absence of ethnic difference in the pharmacokinetics. Both analyses demonstrated that docetaxel clearance is related to α1-acid glycoprotein level, hepatic function, age and body surface area. The relationship was observed between increasing docetaxel dose and increased tumor response rates across the dose range of 60 to 100 mg/m². The area under the serum concentration time curve (AUC) of docetaxel at the first cycle was significantly related to time to progression. Hematological toxicities were well correlated with the AUC of docetaxel, and severe hematological toxicities were more frequently observed in Japanese patients treated with 60 mg/m², compared to the US/European patients treated with 75–100 mg/m² dose. The Japanese population seems more susceptible to the toxicity of docetaxel. A docetaxel dose of 75 mg/m² is now standard not only in global trials but also in recent Japanese trials. Although the optimal dose of docetaxel is still unclear, we need to continue to seek the appropriate dose of docetaxel depending on patient status and the goals of chemotherapy.

The effect of docetaxel on developing oedema in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review

Docetaxel is extensively used in chemotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer. Little attention has been given to oedema as a possible side effect of docetaxel-containing therapies. Until now, no review was conducted to evaluate docetaxel-containing therapies versus docetaxel-free therapies on the magnitude of the risk of developing oedema. In this systematic review, we investigated the risk of developing oedema in patients being treated for breast cancer with or without docetaxel. In this systematic literature review, we searched PubMed and Web of Knowledge for studies on breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy containing docetaxel. We included clinical trials comparing docetaxel versus docetaxel-free chemotherapy. Oedema had to be reported and measured as a key outcome or an adverse effect. Methodological checklists were used to assess the risk of bias within the selected studies. Seven randomised clinical trials were included. Six trials were of moderate methodological quality. All trials showed an increased rate of oedema in the docetaxel-treatment arm. The trial of weakest methodological quality reported the highest incidence of oedema. The results moderately suggest that adjuvant chemotherapy containing docetaxel is related to a significantly increased risk of developing oedema, compared with docetaxel-free chemotherapy.

Assessment of clinical outcomes in breast cancer patients treated with taxanes: multi-analytical approach

Polymorphisms in genes encoding CYPs (Phase I) and ABCB1 (Phase III) enzymes may attribute to variability of efficacy of taxanes. The present study aims to find the influence of CYP and ABCB1 gene polymorphisms on taxanes based clinical outcomes. 132 breast cancer patients treated with taxanes based chemotherapy were genotyped for CYP3A4*1B, CYP3A5*3, CYP1B1*3, CYP2C8*3, ABCB1 1236C>T, 2677G>T/A and 3435C>T polymorphisms using PCR-RFLP. Associations of genetic variants with clinical outcomes in terms of response in 58 patients receiving neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), and chemo-toxicity in 132 patients were studied. Multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR) analysis was performed to evaluate higher order gene-gene interactions with clinical outcomes. Pathological response to taxane based NACT was associated with GA genotype as well as A allele of CYP3A5*3 polymorphism (Pcorr=0.0465, Pcorr=0.0465). Similarly, association was found in dominant model of CYP3A5*3 polymorphism with responders (Pcorr=0.0465). Haplotype analysis further revealed ACYP3A4-ACYP3A5 haplotype to be significantly associated with responders (Pcorr=0.048). In assessing toxicity, significant association of variant (TT) genotype and T allele of ABCB1 2677G>T/A polymorphism, was found with 'grade 1 or no leucopenia' (Pcorr=0.0465, Pcorr=0.048). On evaluating higher order gene-gene interaction models by MDR analysis, CYP3A5*3; ABCB11236C>T and ABCB1 2677G>T/A; ABCB1 3435C>T and CYP1B1*3 showed significant association with treatment response, grade 2-4 anemia and dose delay/reduction due to neutropenia (P=0.024, P=0.004, P=0.026), respectively. Multi-analytical approaches may provide a better assessment of pharmacogenetic based treatment outcomes in breast cancer patients treated with taxanes.

A multicenter phase II trial of docetaxel and capecitabine as salvage treatment in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel plus capecitabine (DC) combination as salvage treatment in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

PATIENTS AND TREATMENT

Patients with MBC who had disease progression after initial chemotherapy with anthracyclines (n = 29; 100 %) and taxanes (n = 11; 37.9 %) were treated with oral capecitabine 950 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14 and docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 3 weeks. Nineteen (65.5 %) patients received this regimen as second line and 10 (34.5 %) as ≥3rd line of therapy. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity.

RESULTS

Complete response occurred in two (6.9 %) patients and partial response in eleven (37.9 %) for an overall response rate of 44.8 % (95 % CI 26.7-62.9 %). Eleven women (37.9 %) had stable disease and five (17.2 %) progressive disease. Of the eleven patients previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes, five (45.5 %) responded to DC combination. The median duration of response was 5.7 months (range 3.4-64.2), the median time to disease progression 9.3 months (range 1.2-58), and the median overall survival 25.5 months. No toxic death occurred. Neutropenia grade 4 occurred in 58.6 % of patients and three of them (10.3 %) developed neutropenic fever. Non-hematological toxicities were manageable with grade 3 hand-foot syndrome occurring in 6.9 % of the patients, fatigue in 3.4 %, and neurotoxicity in 3.4 %.

CONCLUSION

The DC combination is a valuable regimen as salvage treatment in anthracycline- or anthracycline and taxane-pretreated patients with MBC.

Weekly docetaxel in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most frequent tumor among women worldwide and is the second cause of cancer-related mortality in the US. Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) accounts for less than 10% of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients and about 30% of early breast cancer patients will develop recurrent, advanced, or metastatic disease. It remains an incurable illness and the primary goal of its management is palliative. Several agents are active for the first-line treatment of MBC. The taxanes, paclitaxel and docetaxel, represent the standard of care for the treatment of these patients. Among the various schedules, docetaxel can be administered weekly, achieving similar efficacy results with lower toxicity compared with conventional schedules. Weekly docetaxel (25–40 mg/m²) has been widely tested in several phase I and II studies both as a single agent and in multichemotherapy regimens, reaching overall response rates ranging from 26% and 86% or 20% and 73% with docetaxel alone or in combination, respectively, depending on doses, associations, and line of treatment. Overall, published data support the administration of weekly docetaxel for the treatment of MBC patients even if data from phase III randomized trials are still lacking.

A Phase II Study of Docetaxel in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Ewing's Tumours

Purpose. The prognosis for patients with Ewing's tumours who have metastases at presentation or who are refractory to standard chemotherapy regimens remains poor. There is therefore a need to evaluate the role of new agents. This report describes the initial results of a prospective phase II trial of docetaxel in patients with progressive or refractory Ewing's tumours.

Patients and methods. Fourteen patients with Ewing's tumours who had all relapsed or progressed after treatment with multi-drug cytotoxic therapy were treated with docetaxel 100 mg/m² infused over 1 h, three weekly for a maximum of six cycles. Nine patients received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with all cycles.

Results. A partial response was observed in one patient and stable disease in two. The remaining patients progressed on treatment. The major toxicity was myelosuppression and infection with 36% patients experiencing grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and/or infection.

Conclusion. Docetaxel appears to have some activity in Ewing's tumours even in heavily pre-treated patients. Further evaluation of its efficacy at an earlier stage of the disease is warranted.

Skin toxicity as a risk factor for major infections in breast cancer patients treated with docetaxel

Docetaxel-related skin toxicity, oral and gastrointestinal mucosal toxicity, and changes in blood cell counts were investigated as predictive factors for major infections in 143 women treated with 3-weekly docetaxel (100 mg/m2) as second-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer in a randomized trial. Each patient with a major infection (n = 37) was compared with two controls. Skin toxicity (odds ratio 2.97, 95% CI 1.37-6.47), oral mucositis (1.98, CI 1.30-3.04), and the leukocyte nadir (0.12, CI 0.02-0.51) were significantly associated with a major infection in a univariate logistic regression analysis. In a multivariate analysis, skin toxicity was the only independent factor predictive for grade 3 to 4 infection (2.75, CI 1.00-7.58). A major infection was diagnosed in 62% (8 out of 13) of the docetaxel cycles in severely (grade 4) leukopenic patients who had grade 2 to 4 skin toxicity. Major infections are common in leukopenic patients who develop docetaxel-associated skin toxicity, and leukopenic patients presenting with docetaxel-induced skin toxicity may be candidates for prophylactic anti-infection measures such as prophylactic therapy with hematopoietic growth factors.

Side effects after docetaxel treatment in Taiwanese breast cancer patients with CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and ABCB1 gene polymorphisms

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer patients initiating TEC (including docetaxel, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide) treatment were genotyped for CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and ABCB1 to identify variability factors of side effects for docetaxel.

METHODS

The planned dose of docetaxel per course was formulated according to each patient's height and weight. Each participant had received TEC treatment for 6 consecutive cycles. The single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of CYP3A4*4 (352A > G), CYP3A4*5 (653C > G), and CYP3A4*18A (20070T > C) for the CYP3A4 gene, CYP3A5*3A (6986A > G) for the CYP3A5 gene, and -41A > G, -145C > G, 1236C > T, 2677G > T(A), and 3435C > T SNPs for the ABCB1 gene were determined by using the restriction fragment length polymorphism of polymerase chain reaction products and the restriction enzymes.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine Taiwanese women (mean age, 46 y; range, 30-64 y) treated for breast cancer with TEC were recruited. We found that patients carrying the CYP3A5*1/*3 genotype demonstrated more side effects of fever, pleural effusion, and febrile neutropenia than those with the CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype (p = 0.075, 0.077, and 0.030, respectively); moreover, patients with the ABCB1 2677G/G genotype also showed more side effects of fever and febrile neutropenia than those with other genotypes (p = 0.024 and 0.027), In regard to ABCB1 3435C>T, patients with ABCB1 3435C/C tended to suffer leucopenia (p = 0.057).

CONCLUSIONS

There could be correlations between certain side effects of docetaxel treatment and polymorphisms of these metabolic enzymes. Unfortunately, there is not so much evidence due to the small sample size of this study which restricts the statistical power.

Docetaxel–ifosfamide combination in patients with HER2-non-overexpressing advanced breast cancer failing prior anthracyclines

The feasibility of the docetaxel-ifosfamide combination, as well as the definition of maximum tolerated doses (MTD) in a previous phase I study, led us to continue evaluating the regimen in an extended phase II study in patients with HER2-non-overexpressing, anthracycline pre-treated advanced breast cancer. Patients with histologically confirmed metastatic breast cancer failing prior anthracycline-based chemotherapy were treated with docetaxel 100 mg/m2 over 1 h on day 1 followed by ifosfamide 5 g/m2 divided over days 1 and 2 (2.5 g/m2/day over 1 h), and recycled every 21 days with prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration from day 3-until a neutrophil count >10,000/microl. Between March 1999 and June 2002, 71 patients with a median age of 55 years (range, 28-72) and performance status (World Health Organization; WHO) of 1 (range, 0-2) were treated; all were assessable for toxicity and 70 patients for response. Clinical response rates (RRs), on an intention-to-treat basis were: 41/71 [58%; 95% CI, 46.5-69.5%]; 7 complete remissions (CRs), 34 partial remissions (PRs), 15 stable disease (SD) and 15 progressive disease (PD). The median response duration was 7.5 months (2-28 months), median time-to-progression (TTP) 6 months (0.1-30 months), and median overall survival (OS) 12 months (0.1-36 months). Grade 3/4 toxicities included; neutropenia in 63% of patients-with 52% developing grade 4 neutropenia (>or=7 days) and in 11% of these febrile neutropenia (FN), while no grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was observed. Other toxicities included; peripheral neuropathy grade 2 only in 7%, grade 1/2 reversible central nervous system (CNS) toxicity in 11%, no renal toxicity, grade 2 myalgias in 7%, grade 3 diarrhea in 4%, skin/nail toxicity in 11%, and grade 1/2 fluid retention in 28% of patients. The present report has demonstrated encouraging activity of the docetaxel-ifosfamide combination in anthracycline-pretreated, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Therefore, future randomized phase III studies versus single-agent docetaxel or currently established combinations of the latter with other agents in this setting with established clinical activity, such as capecitabine or gemcitabine, will be warranted.

Docetaxel in the treatment of breast cancer: current experience and future prospects

It has become clear over the past 10 years that docetaxel, a semisynthetic taxoid antineoplastic agent, is among the most promising compounds to have been developed in the 1990s for the treatment of breast cancer. Data indicate that this drug became standard therapy in the treatment of patients with metastatic disease who have failed anthracycline treatment, and secondarily showed very encouraging results in the first-line metastatic setting either in monochemotherapy or when docetaxel was combined with an anthracycline. More recently, docetaxel also became one of the standard therapies in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings, and a promising partner for novel biologic therapies. Current research is further exploring the effect of docetaxel on outcome of early breast cancer in order to fully determine the extent that this chemotherapeutic agent will change the natural history of breast cancer.

New Paradigm in Dose-Finding Trials: Patient-Specific Dosing and Beyond Phase I

We propose a new paradigm for the clinical evaluation of new cancer therapies. It entails adjusting the search for the optimal dose on the basis of measurable patient characteristics that may be predictive of adverse responses to treatment, and extending this search beyond phase I and into phases II and III. We provide examples of (a) how the fine-tuning of dose may involve utilization of patient-specific attributes to obtain a personalized treatment regimen, and (b) how novel methods for phase I design can be used to update the working dose for the conduct of phase II and III cancer clinical trials. These examples should be interpreted as an enticement for the development of new methods to implement the proposed new paradigm.

High efficacy and low toxicity of weekly docetaxel given as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Docetaxel is one of the most effective antitumor agents currently available for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This phase II multicenter study prospectively analyzed the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel given on a weekly schedule as first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients received docetaxel, 35 mg/m(2) weekly for 6 weeks, followed by 2 weeks of rest. Subsequent cycles (3 weeks of treatment, 2 weeks of rest) were given until a maximum of 5 cycles or disease progression. Premedication consisted of 8 mg dexamethasone intravenously 30 min prior to the infusion of docetaxel.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients at a median age of 58 years with previously untreated MBC were included in the study. A median of 10 doses (median cumulative dose 339 mg/m(2)) was administered (range: 2-18). The overall response rate was 48.1% (95% CI: 34-61%, intent-to-treat). Median survival was 15.8 months and median time to progression was 5.9 months (intent-to-treat). Hematological toxicity was mild with absence of neutropenia-related complications. Grade 3 neutropenia was observed in 3.7% of patients and grade 3 and 4 anemia was observed in 5.6 and 1.9% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The weekly administration of docetaxel is highly efficient and safe as first-line treatment for MBC and may serve as an important treatment option specifically in elderly patients and patients with a reduced performance status.

Weekly schedule of docetaxel in breast cancer: evaluation of response and toxicity

Several recent studies have investigated the administration of docetaxel on a weekly basis. Here, we review the weekly use of docetaxel in breast cancer. To identify articles published on this topic we performed a computer-assisted MEDLINE search; additional references were found in the bibliographies of these articles. Several phase Tstudies of weekly docetaxel have provided encouraging data indicating that there is generally less myelosuppression than with the three week schedule in patients with a variety of advanced malignancies. Dose-limiting toxicities are reached at 43 to 50 mg/m(2), and the recommended dose ranges from 36 to 42 mg/m(2). Furthermore, five studies of weekly docetaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer achieved 32 to 41% response rates using 25 to 40 mg/m(2) of docetaxel. Myelosuppression was mild, but fatigue was common and was the most common reason for dose reduction. In general, the planned dose intensity was equivalent to those used in standard three week schedules, and fatigue, asthenia, nail changes, excessive lacrimation (tearing), and fluid retention became more common with prolonged administration of docetaxel. Thus, weekly scheduling of docetaxel maintains efficacy and alters the toxicity profile, and the use of weekly docetaxel will become a promising alternative to three week dosing in the treatment of advanced breast cancer once randomized controlled studies confirm these results. However, there is still much to learn about the role of weekly docetaxel in adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy.

Phase II study of docetaxel in patients with relapsed or refractory malignant lymphoma

We report the activity and toxicity of docetaxel in 12 evaluable heavily pretreated patients with relapsed and refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and Hodgkin's disease. In all, 42% achieved a partial response, 25% achieved stable disease. Median duration of response was 16 (10-21) weeks. The median overall survival was 70 (9-178) weeks and for responders it was 120 (22-178) weeks. One patient developed one episode of neutropenic sepsis. Docetaxel has limited activity in this group of patients.

A phase I dose-escalation study of docetaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in patients with solid tumours

BACKGROUND

Docetaxel is a widely active cytotoxic agent. The principal dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the 3-weekly regimen are neutropenia and febrile neutropenia. Use of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) may allow higher doses of docetaxel to be administered with potentially greater anticancer efficacy. The objectives of this study were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicity profile of docetaxel given with G-CSF support.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had solid tumours and were aged 18-75 years with a WHO performance status of up to 2. Strict criteria for liver function were followed. Patients may have received one previous regimen of chemotherapy in addition to adjuvant chemotherapy. Cohorts of three to six patients received docetaxel over 60-90 min every 3 weeks, commencing at 110 mg/m(2) and escalating at 10 mg/m(2) increments. Patients also received G-CSF 5 micro g/kg/day until neutrophil recovery. A 3-day corticosteroid prophylaxis was given.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients with median age 55 years (range 29-75) were included. Fourteen (48%) had previously received chemotherapy. At the 170 mg/m(2) dose level (the MTD), two of three patients had DLTs and 160 mg/m(2) was determined to be the recommended dose. The principal DLTs were skin and neurosensory toxicity. Asthenia was frequent, especially at dose levels >/=140 mg/m(2). Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in only 10 patients (35%) and was not dose related, with febrile neutropenia in three patients (10%).

CONCLUSIONS

Docetaxel may be escalated considerably above standard doses when administered with G-CSF support. The recommended dose for phase II studies is 160 mg/m(2). With escalated-dose docetaxel, DLTs were non-haematological and qualitatively similar to the toxicity profile at standard doses.

Phase I-II study of docetaxel and ifosfamide combination in patients with anthracycline pretreated advanced breast cancer

Given the established individual activity of docetaxel and ifosfamide in anthracycline pretreated advanced breast cancer, the present phase I-II study aimed to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and activity of the docetaxel-ifosfamide combination in this setting. Cohorts of three to six patients with histologically confirmed metastatic breast cancer after prior anthracycline-based chemotherapy were treated at successive dose levels (DLs) with escalated doses of docetaxel 70-100 mg x m(-2) over 1 h on day 1 followed by ifosfamide 5-6 g x m(-2) divided over days 1 and 2 (2.5-3.0 g x m(-2) day(-1) over 1 h), and recycled every 21 days. G-CSF was added once dose-limiting neutropenia was encountered at a certain DL and planned to be incorporated prophylactically in subsequent higher DLs. In total, 56 patients with a median age of 54.5 (range, 32-72) years and performance status (WHO) of 1 (range, 0-2) were treated at five DLs as follows: 21 in phase I DLs (DL1: 3, DL2: 6, DL3: 3, DL4: 6, and DL5: 3) and the remaining 35 were treated at DL4 (total of 41 patients at DL4), which was defined as the level for phase II testing. All patients were assessable for toxicity and 53 for response. Dose-limiting toxicity (with the addition of G-CSF after DL2) was reached at DL5 with two out of three initial patients developing febrile neutropenia (FN). Clinical response rates, on an intention-to-treat basis, in phase II were: 53.6% (95% CI, 38.3-68.9%); three complete remissions, 19 partial remissions, seven stable disease, and 12 progressive disease. The median response duration was 7 months (3-24 months), median time to progression 6.5 month (0.1-26 month), and median overall survival 13 months (0.1-33 months). Grade 3/4 toxicities included time to progression neutropenia in 78% of patients-with 63% developing grade 4 neutropenia (<or=7 days) and in 12% of these FN, while no grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was observed. Other toxicities included peripheral neuropathy grade 2 only in 12%, grade 1/2 reversible CNS toxicity in 17%, no renal toxicity, grade 2 myalgias in 10%, grade 3 diarrhoea in 10%, skin/nail toxicity in 17%, and grade 2 fluid retention in 2% of patients. One patient in the study treated at phase II died as a result of acute liver failure after the first cycle. In conclusion, the present phase I-II study determined the feasibility of the docetaxel-ifosfamide combination, defined the MTD and demonstrated the encouraging activity of the regimen in phase II, thus warranting further randomised phase III comparisons to single-agent docetaxel or combinations of the latter with other active agents.

A phase II study of docetaxel in paclitaxel-resistant ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

OBJECTIVES

Docetaxel is an inhibitor of microtubule depolymerization and has demonstrated activity in paclitaxel-resistant breast cancer and gynecologic cancer. The Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) conducted a study of docetaxel in paclitaxel-resistant ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma to determine its activity, and nature and degree of toxicity, in this cohort of patients.

METHODS

Patients with platinum- and paclitaxel-resistant ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma, defined as progression while on or within 6 months of therapy, were eligible if they had measurable disease and had not received more than one chemotherapy regimen. Docetaxel at a dose of 100 mg/m(2) was administered iv over 1 h every 21 days. A prophylactic regimen of oral dexamethasone 8 mg bid was begun 24 h before docetaxel administration and continued for 48 h thereafter. Hepatic function was strictly monitored.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were entered and treated with a total of 256 courses, with all 60 evaluable for toxicity and 58 evaluable for response. Responses were observed in 22.4% of patients, with 5.2% achieving complete response and 17.2% achieving partial response (95% CI, 12.5-35.3%). The median duration of response was 2.5 months. The likelihood of observing a response did not appear to be related to the length of the prior paclitaxel-free interval or duration of prior paclitaxel infusions. The principal adverse effect of grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 75% of patients. There was one treatment-related death. Dose reductions were required in 36% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Docetaxel is active in paclitaxel-resistant ovarian and peritoneal cancer but, in view of significant hematologic toxicity, further study is warranted to ascertain its optimal dose and schedule.

Docetaxel with epirubicin--investigations on cardiac safety

The aim was to evaluate clinical and subclinical cardiac toxicity of epirubicin-docetaxel (ET) combination. Breast cancer patients were given epirubicin (75 mg/m2 for 15 min), followed 1 h later by a 1-h infusion of docetaxel (75 mg/m2) q3w as first-line treatment. Cardiac function was monitored using a 24-h ambulatory electrocardiogram (ECG), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), physical examination and chest radiography. The median LVEF did not decrease during the course of the treatment: median LVEF was 64% prior to treatment and 68% after cycle 8. The 24-h ECG did not reveal any significant changes in heart rate variability. The number of extrasystoles or cardiac arrhythmia did not increase with the ET treatment. No patient experienced congestive heart failure during treatment or the mean follow-up of 34 months. We conclude that first-line ET caused no major cardiac changes during 6 months of treatment (8 cycles) or during follow-up. Twenty-four-hour ECG, combined with echocardiography to measure LVEF, was a feasible method for the close monitoring of the cardiac effects during chemotherapy.

Chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer-report of a European expert panel

The anthracyclines doxorubicin and epirubicin, and the taxanes paclitaxel and docetaxel, are effective chemotherapeutic agents for the first-line and second-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer, and their clinical use is widespread. However, for women whose disease has progressed despite receiving these drugs, treatment options are limited. These women often have a good performance status, and may survive for many months or even years, so they should be given the opportunity to benefit from further chemotherapy. The goals of chemotherapy in these patients are to obtain maximum control of symptoms, prevent serious complications, and increase survival without diminishing quality of life. Several agents are used for this purpose, including fluorouracil, docetaxel (in patients who have already received paclitaxel), vinorelbine, and mitomycin c, but because data from controlled trials are limited, a standard regimen has not yet been established. Moreover, these agents may be inconvenient to administer and can be associated with adverse events requiring hospitalisation. Therefore, there is a clear need for additional therapeutic options for patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ideally, agents should have a convenient method of administration, eg, oral, and should be suitable for home-based rather than hospital-based therapy. Treatment should control disease in at least 20-30% of patients with an acceptable side-effect profile. Novel oral therapies have now been developed and are being used increasingly in patients whose disease has progressed following taxane therapy.

Epirubicin/docetaxel regimen in progressive breast cancer-a phase II study

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of 6 months' treatment with the combination of epirubicin and docetaxel in metastatic breast cancer. Thirty-eight women (mean age 51 years, range 35-72) with metastatic breast cancer were treated with a regimen of epirubicin 75 mg/m and docetaxel 75 mg/m every 3 weeks, given 4 times if progression was seen upon evaluation after 4 courses or 8 times in responding/stable patients. The patients received 285 cycles of combination treatment and two treatments with docetaxel or epirubicin alone. When neutropenia with fever was observed, further cycles were given with dose reduction. The median cumulative docetaxel dose was 462 mg/m (range 199-600) and that of epirubicin 476 mg/m (range 199-740). The overall response rate was 54% (95% CI 37-71), with a median duration of response of 14.8 months (95% CI 8.8-27.8). Median time to progression was 12 months, median survival 26 months. Neutropenia below 0.5 x 10 /l occurred following 113 (39%) of the total of 285 cycles given; 21 patients (55%) were hospitalized for febrile neutropenia. We conclude that dose tailoring is required in treatment with an epirubicin and docetaxel regimen to avoid grade 3/4 adverse effects in a significant number of patients treated for metastatic breast cancer.

Gastrointestinal toxicity associated with weekly docetaxel treatment

Previous studies have demonstrated a marked reduction of haematological and non-haematological toxicity if weekly doses of docetaxel <40 mg/m2 were used. Reviewing the literature, neutropenic enterocolitis is uncommon but not unknown in patients treated with taxane-based chemotherapy. Although this complication occurs rarely, here we report on two patients, one with metastatic breast cancer and one with non-small-cell lung cancer, treated on a weekly schedule with single-agent docetaxel. Both patients developed excessive and fatal haemorrhragic gastroduodenitis and enterocolitis associated with grade 2 and 3 neutropenia. We would like to stress the importance of symptoms such as abdominal pain and tenderness, fever, diarrhoea and mucositis, with or without neutropenic fever, in patients treated with docetaxel-based chemotherapy. These symptoms should alert the physician and supportive care management should be started aggressively and immediately.

Efficacy of docetaxel 60 mg/m2 in patients with metastatic breast cancer according to the status of anthracycline resistance

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of docetaxel 60 mg/m2 in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) according to the status of anthracycline resistance.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ninety-nine patients with anthracycline-resistant MBC were treated with docetaxel 60 mg/m2 intravenously for a 90-minute period every 3 to 4 weeks. Anthracycline resistance was defined as primary and secondary resistance. Primary resistance was defined as progression during or within 6 months after completion of adjuvant anthracycline, and no MBC response to a first-line regimen that contained anthracycline. Secondary resistance was defined as progression after a documented clinical response to a first-line anthracycline treatment for MBC. Secondary resistance was further divided into three categories: (1) absolute resistance, or progression during treatment with anthracycline after a period of response; (2) relative resistance, or progression within 6 months after anthracycline administration ended; and (3) sensitive regrowth, or progression more than 6 months after the conclusion of anthracycline administration.

RESULTS

The response rate in the 99 patients was 35.4% (95% confidence interval, 30.1% to 44.8%). The response rates according to the status of anthracycline resistance were as follows: primary resistance (n = 46), 19.6%; secondary resistance (n = 53), 49.1% (absolute resistance [n = 16], 56.3%); relative resistance (n = 17), 47.1%; and sensitive regrowth (n = 20), 45.0%. The median time to treatment failure in patients with primary resistance was 2.9 months, compared with 5.2 months in patients with secondary resistance (P = .0022).

CONCLUSION

Docetaxel at a dose of 60 mg/m2 seemed to be effective in MBC with secondary resistance to anthracycline. The status of anthracycline resistance is important for the prediction of response to second-line treatment with docetaxel.

Systemic therapy

Our knowledge base on systemic therapy for breast cancer continues to expand, including further information regarding hormonal prevention in high-risk women, beneficial effects of tamoxifen in noninvasive disease, an update on primary systemic therapy, and optimization of adjuvant strategies, including data on adjuvant chemoendocrine regimens. The proper evaluation of high-dose strategies has been jeopardized by a serious episode of scientific misconduct. New data are also available on palliative options, bisphosphonates, antibody therapies, and novel targets. Data continue to evolve on the role and optimal schedules of taxanes in early-stage and advanced breast cancer. These and other important recent findings are discussed in this review article.

Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus best supportive care in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether treatment with single-agent docetaxel would result in longer survival than would best supportive care in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer who had previously been treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Secondary end points included assessment of response (docetaxel arm only), toxicity, and quality of life.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with performance statuses of 0 to 2 and stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer with either measurable or evaluable lesions were eligible for entry onto the study if they had undergone one or more platinum-based chemotherapy regimens and if they had adequate hematology and biochemistry parameters. They were excluded if they had symptomatic brain metastases or if they had previously been treated with paclitaxel. Patients were stratified by performance status and best response to cisplatin chemotherapy and were then randomized to treatment with docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) (49 patients) or 75 mg/m(2) (55 patients) or best supportive care. Patients in both arms were assessed every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

One hundred four patients (103 of whom were eligible for entry onto the study) were well balanced for prognostic factors. Of 84 patients with measurable lesions, six (7. 1%) achieved partial responses (three patients at each dose level). Time to progression was longer for docetaxel patients than for best supportive care patients (10.6 v 6.7 weeks, respectively; P <.001), as was median survival (7.0 v 4.6 months; log-rank test, P =.047). The difference was more significant for docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) patients, compared with corresponding best supportive care patients (7.5 v 4.6 months; log-rank test, P =.010; 1-year survival, 37% v 11%; chi(2) test, P =.003). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 11 patients treated with docetaxel 100 mg/m(2), three of whom died, and in one patient treated with docetaxel 75 mg/m(2). Grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicity, with the exception of diarrhea, occurred at a similar rate in both the docetaxel and best supportive care groups.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with docetaxel is associated with significant prolongation of survival, and at a dose of 75 mg/m(2), the benefits of docetaxel therapy outweigh the risks.

Docetaxel-induced mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells in a murine model: kinetics, dose titration, and toxicity

OBJECTIVE

Docetaxel (DXT) is an anticancer agent that has demonstrated therapeutic efficacy against solid tumors, particularly breast cancer. Based on the use of hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation to restore hematopoietic reconstitution after myeloablative therapy, this study was performed to determine if DXT could mobilize HSCs in vivo.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

C57Bl/6 mice were injected intraperitoneally with varying doses of DXT (equivalent to human doses of 40 to 120 mg/m(2)). Spleens were harvested on days 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 after DXT administration for recovery of mononuclear cells (MNCs). The number of HSCs present within the MNCs was determined by clonogenic assay for colony-forming units in culture (CFU-C) and by FACS analysis for CD34(+) cells. Peripheral blood samples were obtained at the time of spleen harvest to determine the hematologic profile. Liver and renal function tests were performed to monitor toxicity.

RESULTS

DXT mobilize d HSCs in a dose- and time-dependent manner. When measured by the CFU-C assay, maximal mobilization of HSC (>10-fold increase in control; p<0.01) was observed at a dose of 30 mg/kg (equivalent to human dose of 75 mg/m(2)) on day 7. The number of mobilized HSCs peaked on days 6 to 8 at all doses of DXT tested. There was no evidence of weight loss, liver, or renal toxicity at any of the DXT doses tested.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that DXT efficiently mobilizes HSCs in a murine model and provide the rationale for similar studies in a clinical trial.

Docetaxel administered on a weekly basis for metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of weekly docetaxel in women with metastatic breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-nine women were enrolled onto a study of weekly docetaxel given at 40 mg/m(2)/wk. Each cycle consisted of 6 weeks of therapy followed by a 2-week treatment break, repeated until disease progression or removal from study for toxicity or patient preference. Fifty-two percent of patients had been previously treated with adjuvant chemotherapy; 21% had received prior chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer, and 31% had previously received anthracyclines. All patients were assessable for toxicity; two patients were not assessable for response but are included in an intent-to-treat analysis.

RESULTS

Patients received a median of 18 infusions, with a median cumulative docetaxel dose of 720 mg/m(2). There were no complete responses. Twelve patients had partial responses (overall response rate, 41%; 95% confidence interval, 24% to 61%), all occurring within the first two cycles. Similar response rates were observed among subgroups of patients previously treated either with any prior chemotherapy or with anthracyclines. An additional 17% of patients had stable disease for at least 6 months. The regimen was generally well tolerated. There was no grade 4 toxicity. Only 28% of patients had any grade 3 toxicity, most commonly neutropenia and fatigue. Acute toxicity, including myelosuppression, was mild. Fatigue, fluid retention, and eye tearing/conjunctivitis became more common with repetitive dosing, although these side effects rarely exceeded grade 2. Dose reductions were made for eight of 29 patients, most often because of fatigue (n = 5).

CONCLUSION

Weekly docetaxel is active in treating patients with metastatic breast cancer, with a side effect profile that differs from every-3-weeks therapy.