Aging in Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer: Implications for Future Care

Neurocognitive outcome and associated factors in long-term, adult survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia, treated without cranial radiation therapy

OBJECTIVE

There is limited research on neurocognitive outcome and associated risk factors in long-term, adult survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), without treatment of cranial radiation therapy. Moreover, the impact of fatigue severity and pain interference on neurocognition has received little attention. In this cross-sectional study, we examined neurocognitive outcome and associated factors in this population.

METHOD

Intellectual abilities, verbal learning/memory, processing speed, attention, and executive functions were compared to normative means/medians with one sample t tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Associations with risk factors, fatigue severity, and pain interference were analyzed with linear regressions.

RESULTS

Long-term, adult survivors of childhood ALL (N = 53, 51% females, mean age = 24.4 years, SD = 4.4, mean = 14.7 years post-diagnosis, SD = 3.4) demonstrated above average intellectual abilities, but performed below average in attention, inhibition, processing speed, and shifting (p < 0.001). Executive functioning complaints were significantly higher than normative means, and positively associated with fatigue (p < 0.001). There was no interaction between sex and fatigue and no neurocognitive impairments were associated with pain interference, risk group, age at diagnosis, or sex.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term, adult survivors of ALL treated without cranial radiation therapy, demonstrate domain-specific performance-based neurocognitive impairments. However, continued research on the neurocognitive outcome in this population as they age will be important in the coming years. Executive functioning complaints were frequently in the clinical range, and often accompanied by fatigue. This suggests a need for cognitive rehabilitation programs.

Characterization of brain development with neuroimaging in a female mouse model of chemotherapy treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Background

Survivors of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) exhibit abnormal neurocognitive outcomes that are possibly due to exposures to neurotoxic chemotherapy agents. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of characterizing long-term neuroanatomical changes with in vivo neuroimaging in a preclinical model of treatment for ALL.

Methods

Female mice (C57BL/6) were randomly assigned to a saline control group (n=10) or a treatment group (n=10) that received intrathecal methotrexate and oral dexamethasone (IT-MTX + DEX). Mice were subsequently scanned three times on a 7T MRI at ages 3, 6, and 12 months (T1, T2, and T3, respectively), which corresponds with human age-equivalents spanning early to late adulthood. Regional brain volumes were automatically segmented, and volume change between timepoints (i.e., T1 to T2; and T2 to T3) were compared between groups (i.e., saline vs. IT-MTX + DEX).

Results

Five mice in the IT-MTX + DEX group, and seven mice in the saline group completed all three scans. Between T1 and T2, volumetric change was significantly different between groups in total gray matter [estimate =2.06, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.27-3.84], the cerebrum (estimate =1.62, 95% CI: 0.14-3.09), claustrum (estimate =0.06, 95% CI: 0.02-0.09), amygdala (estimate =0.16, 95% CI: 0.03-0.29), and striatum (estimate =0.18, 95% CI: 0.01-0.35), with the IT-MTX + DEX group exhibiting a more robust increase in volume than the saline-treated group. Between T2 and T3, group differences in structural brain development were evident for total white matter (estimate =-0.14, 95% CI: -0.27 to -0.01), and the corpus callosum (estimate =-0.09, 95% CI: -0.19 to 0.00) and amygdala (estimate =-0.05, 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.00). In contrast to the rapid brain growth observed earlier in development (i.e., T1 to T2), the IT-MTX + DEX group exhibited an attenuated increase in volume relative to the saline-treated group between T2 and T3.

Conclusions

The results demonstrate feasibility of modeling pediatric ALL treatment in a preclinical model and highlight the potential of using preclinical neuroimaging models to gain insight into brain development throughout survivorship.

S, Williams AM, Lubas M, Brinkman TM, Chemaitilly W, Robison LL, Hudson MM, Krull KR, Delaney A. Hypogonadism and neurocognitive outcomes among childhood cancer survivors

OBJECTIVE

Childhood cancer survivors are at risk for hypogonadism. The impact of hypogonadism on neurocognitive impairment and emotional distress in the non-cancer population has been shown; however, the relationship among the childhood cancer survivor population is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the contribution of hypogonadism to neurocognitive impairment and emotional distress among survivors.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study using retrospective cohort.

METHODS

In total, 3628 survivors who completed standard neurocognitive tests (six domains: processing speed, memory, executive function, attention, academics, and global cognition) and self-reported emotional distress were included in our study. Participants were stratified by sex and gonadal status. Outcomes were compared between hypogonadal and eugonadal groups by multivariable analysis, adjusting for established predictors, and mediation analyses to determine the direct/indirect effects of hypogonadism on outcomes.

RESULTS

The hypogonadal group exhibited a higher prevalence of neurocognitive impairment across domains, but no difference in emotional distress. Hypogonadal females exhibited higher relative risk (1.7, 95% CI, 1.2-2.5) for impaired visual processing speed, compared to eugonadal females after adjusting for cancer-related variables. In mediation models, hypogonadism had a significant direct (P < .01) and indirect (from P < .01) impact on impairment in visual processing speed among females. Males demonstrated direct (P = .03) and indirect (P = .04) impact of hypogonadism on motor processing speed.

CONCLUSION

Processing speed may be the most vulnerable neurocognitive domain associated with hypogonadism in survivors, while other domains were mainly impacted by cancer-related variables. Our findings support the need for further evaluation of the impact of sex hormone replacement therapy on neurocognitive function.

A systematic review of pediatric neuropsychological outcomes with proton versus photon radiation therapy: A call for equity in access to treatment

OBJECTIVE

There is increasing interest in the utilization of proton beam radiation therapy (PRT) to treat pediatric brain tumors based upon presumed advantages over traditional photon radiation therapy (XRT). PRT provides more conformal radiation to the tumor with reduced dose to healthy brain parenchyma. Less radiation exposure to brain tissue beyond the tumor is thought to reduce neuropsychological sequelae. This systematic review aimed to provide an overview of published studies comparing neuropsychological outcomes between PRT and XRT.

METHOD

PubMed, PsychINFO, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane were systematically searched for peer-reviewed published studies that compared neuropsychological outcomes between PRT and XRT in pediatric brain tumor patients.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included. Six of the studies utilized retrospective neuropsychological data; the majority were longitudinal studies (n = 5). XRT was found to result in lower neuropsychological functioning across time. PRT was associated with generally stable neuropsychological functioning across time, with the exception of working memory and processing speed, which showed variable outcomes across studies. However, studies inconsistently included or considered medical and sociodemographic differences between treatment groups, which may have impacted neuropsychological outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite methodological limitations, including limited baseline neuropsychological evaluations, temporal variability between radiation treatment and first evaluation or initial and follow-up evaluations, and heterogenous samples, there is emerging evidence of sociodemographic inequities in access to PRT. With more institutions dedicating funding towards PRT, there may be the opportunity to objectively evaluate the neuropsychological benefits of patients matched on medical and sociodemographic variables.