Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on postoperative morbidity in soft tissue sarcomas

Does Time to Initiation of Adjuvant Radiotherapy Affect Reconstruction Outcomes after Endoscopic Resection of Skull Base Malignancies?

Introduction and Objective  It is unclear if the length of the time interval to initiation of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) after endoscopic endonasal surgery affects reconstruction outcomes. In this study we present our experience with adjuvant RT after endoscopic endonasal procedures, to determine if the time to RT after surgery impacts post-RT reconstruction complication rates. Methods  A retrospective cohort study of 164 patients who underwent endoscopic endonasal surgery between 1998 and 2021 was conducted. Using Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs), we evaluated several variables and the complications that occurred during the 1-year period after starting RT. Results  Seventy-eight (47.5%) and eighty-six patients (52.5%) received RT before and after the sixth postoperative week, respectively. The overall post-RT complication rates were 28%, most of these were severe infections ( n  = 20, 12.2%) and delayed CSF leak ( n  = 4, 2.5%). There was no significant difference in the post-RT complications between the patients who received postoperative RT before or after the sixth operative week (HR: 1.13; 95% confidence interval: 0.63-2.02; p = 0.675 ). Univariate analysis demonstrated negative impact associated with smoking history ( p = 0.015 ), the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy ( p = 0.0001 ), and the use of photon therapy ( p = 0.012 ); and we found a positive impact with the use of multilayer reconstruction techniques (overall, p = 0.041 ; with fat, p = 0.038 ; and/or fascia graft, p = 0.035 ). After a multivariate analysis only, smoking history was an independent risk factor for post-RT complications ( p = 0.012 ). Conclusion  Delaying RT for more than 6 weeks after endoscopic endonasal surgery does not provide a significant benefit for reconstruction outcomes. However, special attention may be warranted in patients with smoking history who have received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, or in patients who will receive photon-based RT after surgery as these groups were found to have increased complication rates post-RT.

A systematic review of the role of chemotherapy in retroperitoneal sarcoma by the Australia and New Zealand sarcoma association clinical practice guidelines working party

BACKGROUND

In primary localised resectable retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS), loco-regional and distant relapse occur frequently despite optimal surgical management. The role of chemotherapy in improving outcomes is unclear.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted, using the population, intervention, comparison outcome (PICO) model, to evaluate whether neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy improve outcomes in adults with primary localised resectable RPS. Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central were queried for publications from 1946 to June 2022 that evaluated recurrence free survival, overall survival, and post operative complications. Each study was screened by two independent reviewers for suitability. A qualitative synthesis of the results was performed.

RESULTS

Twenty three studies were identified; one meta-analysis of retrospective studies and 22 retrospective studies including three with propensity matched cohorts. Most studies did not analyse outcomes by histology, detail treatment regimens, provide baseline characteristics or selection criteria for those receiving chemotherapy. Evidence of selection bias was illustrated in several studies. Newcastle-Ottawa quality of retrospective cohort studies was good for 12 studies and poor for 10 studies. All studies were assessed as Level III-2 evidence by the Australian NHMRC hierarchy. Overall, the addition of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy to surgery was not associated with improvement in local recurrence, metastasis free survival, disease free survival or overall survival in primary localised resectable RPS. There is some evidence of an association of chemotherapy with worse overall survival. One single centre study showed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with increased post operative complications compared to surgery alone in primary localised resectable RPS.

CONCLUSIONS

There is currently no evidence that demonstrates the addition of chemotherapy to surgery improves outcomes in adult patients with primary localised resectable RPS. Available evidence is limited by its retrospective nature and high likelihood of selection bias with chemotherapy generally administered to patients at higher risk of recurrence and many patients not receiving care in high volume sarcoma centres. Randomised trials are required to conclusively determine the role of chemotherapy in primary localised resectable RPS.

How to treat liposarcomas located in retroperitoneum

Almost half of retroperitoneal (RP) sarcomas are liposarcomas (LPS). The large majority of RP LPS are either well-differentiated LPS (WDLPS) or dedifferentiated LPS (DDLPS), these latter further classified according to grading in G2 and G3 DDLPS. Surgery is the only potentially curative treatment to achieve local control and possibly cure in primary localized disease. Over the last decade, a better delineation of the different histology-specific patterns of failure and the development of nomograms predictors of outcome has led to a better management of these rare tumors, with a special focus on non-surgical treatments. Available evidences - although far from exhaustive - show that radiation therapy might have a role, if any, as neoadjuvant treatment in locally aggressive histologies (i.e. WDLPS and G2 DDLPS), while it does not seem beneficial for histologies with a higher metastatic risk (i.e. G3 DDLPS and leiomyosarcoma). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, instead, can be considered to reduce the risk of distant metastasis while waiting for the results of an ongoing RCT (STRASS-2) evaluating its effect in these tumors. However, given the rarity of these diseases and the subsequent lack of strong evidences to guide treatment, outcome improvement in these patients remains a challenge. Patients' referral to a sarcoma center where a dedicated specialized multidisciplinary team tailor optimal treatment on a case-by-case basis is crucial to ensure these patients the best outcome. Refining available nomograms - e.g including molecular variables - and identifying predictors of response/toxicity to chemotherapy and immunotherapy might be significantly helpful in tailoring treatments to the patient's characteristics. Also, new systemic agents are eagerly awaited for improving the management further.

Surgical Management of Retroperitoneal Sarcoma

Surgery is the cornerstone of treatment for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). Surgery should be performed by a surgical oncologist with sub-specialization in this disease and in the context of a multidisciplinary team of sarcoma specialists. For primary RPS, the goal of surgery is to achieve the complete en bloc resection of the tumor along with involved organs and structures to maximize the clearance of the disease. The extent of resection also needs to consider the risk of complications. Unfortunately, the overarching challenge in primary RPS treatment is that even with optimal surgery, tumor recurrence occurs frequently. The pattern of recurrence after surgery (e.g., local versus distant) is strongly associated with the specific histologic type of RPS. Radiation and systemic therapy may improve outcomes in RPS and there is emerging data studying the benefit of non-surgical treatments in primary disease. Topics in need of further investigation include criteria for unresectability and management of locally recurrent disease. Moving forward, global collaboration among RPS specialists will be key for continuing to advance our understanding of this disease and find more effective treatments.

Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: Histology Is Everything

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are a rare subset of soft tissue sarcoma that are composed of only a few histologic subtypes, each with a distinct tumor biology, clinical presentation, preferred treatment strategy, recurrence risk, and surveillance plan. In the modern era of precision medicine, our understanding of the implications of subtype tumor biology and anatomic location has led to a more nuanced, histology-specific approach to therapy, including surgery, neoadjuvant radiation therapy, and/or chemotherapy. This article provides a summary of recent updates to the management of RPS.

Role of Radiation Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Retroperitoneal Sarcoma

OPINION STATEMENT

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare, aggressive, and heterogenous tumors, comprising approximately 1% of adult cancers with over 50 different subtypes. The mainstay of treatment for retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) includes surgical resection. The addition of radiation therapy (RT), either preoperatively or postoperatively, has been used to potentially decrease the risk of local recurrence. The recently published results from STRASS (EORTC-STBSG 62092-22092), which randomized patients to receive or not receive preoperative radiation, indicate no abdominal recurrence-free survival benefit (primary endpoint) nor overall survival benefit to date from the addition of preoperative RT prior to surgical resection in patients with RPS. Keeping in mind caveats of subgroup analyses, the data show a significant reduction in local recurrence with radiation therapy in resected patients and non-significant trends toward improved abdominal recurrence-free survival in all patients and improved local control and abdominal recurrence-free survival in patients with liposarcoma and low-grade sarcoma. Given the high rate of local failure with surgery alone, it is possible that higher RT dose and/or selective RT dose painting may improve outcomes. Prior to treatment, the authors encourage multidisciplinary review and discussion of management options at a sarcoma center for patients with RPS. Selective use of RT may be considered for patients at high risk of local recurrence.

The Role of Chemotherapy in Extraskeletal Osteosarcoma: A Propensity Score Analysis of the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Database

BACKGROUND Incidence of extraskeletal osteosarcoma (ESOS) is extremely low and the prognosis remains unclear. We conducted this study to explore prognostic factors and the role of chemotherapy in ESOS. MATERIAL AND METHODS We screened data from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (1975-2016). Three hundred ten patients with ESOS were included and 49.4% (107/310) of them underwent chemotherapy. We performed logistic regression analysis to investigate potential factors determining selection of chemotherapy. An inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and propensity score matching (PSM)-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curve was created and log-rank test and Cox regression analysis were performed to compare overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients treated with and without chemotherapy. Subgroup analysis also was conducted based on age, tumor site, stage, size, and surgery. RESULTS Chemotherapy in ESOS was not associated with improved OS in the unmatched cohort (HR, 0.764; 95% CI, 0.555-1.051; p=0.098). The insignificant treatment effect of chemotherapy was also noted in IPTW-adjusted (HR, 0.737; 95% CI, 0.533-1.021; p=0.066) and PSM-adjusted (HR, 0.804; 95% CI, 0.552-1.172; p=0.257) Cox regression analysis. The insignificant treatment effect was consistent across all subgroups and there was no significant heterogeneity of chemotherapy effect (all p for interaction >0.05). CONCLUSIONS The study suggested that chemotherapy has no significant benefit on prognosis of patients with ESOS. These findings should be considered when making treatment decisions about patients with ESOS.

Soft-tissue sarcoma in adults: An update on the current state of histiotype-specific management in an era of personalized medicine

Soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumors that account for 1% of all adult malignancies, with over 100 different histologic subtypes occurring predominately in the trunk, extremity, and retroperitoneum. This low incidence is further complicated by their variable presentation, behavior, and long-term outcomes, which emphasize the importance of centralized care in specialized centers with a multidisciplinary team approach. In the last decade, there has been an effort to improve the quality of care for patients with STS based on anatomic site and histology, and multiple ongoing clinical trials are focusing on tailoring therapy to histologic subtype. This report summarizes the latest evidence guiding the histiotype-specific management of extremity/truncal and retroperitoneal STS with regard to surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy.

Patient's quality of life after surgery and radiotherapy for extremity soft tissue sarcoma - a retrospective single-center study over ten years

Background and objectives

The purpose of this study is to analyze major complication rates and different aspects of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients treated with or without radio (chemo) therapy and surgery.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent Extremity STS excision from 2004 to 2014 (182 patients included). Patients’ data were collected from patients’ records. HRQoL was assessed by using EORTC QLQ-C30.

Results

A total of 182 patients underwent sarcoma resection. After neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT), the major-complication rate amounted to 28% (vs. 7%, no radiotherapy, p <  0.001). Major-complication rates after adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) occurred in 8% (vs. 7%, no radiotherapy, p = 0.265). Comparison QoL scores between treating with neoadjuvant RCT or without RT revealed significant worse scores with neoadjuvant RCT. Further stratification of disease control of these patients showed significant reduced scores in the group of disease-free patients with neoadjuvant RCT compared to irradiated disease-free patients.

Discussion

To date, there have only been a few investigations of QoL in STS. Retrospective study on quality of life have limitations, like a lack of baseline evaluation of QoL. Patient candidated to radiation therapy could have had worse QoL baseline due to more advanced disease. Disease status of the patients who answered the questionnaires could have been an influence of QoL and we could show reduced scores in the group of disease-free patients with neoadjuvant RCT, but not for the patients with recurrence or metastasis, so it is very hard to discriminate whether radiation therapy could really have an impact or not.

Conclusion

This study might assist in further improving the understanding of QoL in STS patients and may animate for prospective studies examining the oncological therapies impact on HRQoL.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Treatment and the Evidence-Based Interaction with Immediate Autologous and Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction

This article aims to determine the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on immediate breast reconstruction by assessing their compatibility for oncological safety and the incidence and management of postoperative complications. A review of scientific publications published between 2009 and 2017 was undertaken. The relationship between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immediate breast reconstruction was analyzed to compile and assess the potential interaction between the procedures. The search was limited to English language publications, but there were no limiting factors at the level of study typology. Full-text articles, including the references leading to other relevant studies, were evaluated.

Neoadjuvant and adjuvant strategies in retroperitoneal sarcoma

Extended surgery remains the mainstay of treatment in retroperitoneal sarcoma, although conflicting data exist on the benefit of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies, particularly with regard to tumour grade and histological type. Experience of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in extremity soft tissue sarcoma can inform treatment strategies, however these data cannot be universally extrapolated to the retroperitoneum where disease biology and anatomical considerations are different. The present review sets a historical context before discussing recent evidence and on-going multi-centre trials in retroperitoneal sarcoma. Promising data on histologically- and molecularly-targeted chemotherapy are discussed and the need for centralisation of retroperitoneal sarcoma services in order to facilitate large international collaborative trials is emphasised.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcomas: latest evidence and clinical implications

Soft tissue sarcomas are a rare and multifaceted group of solid tumours. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasingly used to limit loss of function after wide surgical excision with the ultimate aim of improving patient survival. Recently, advances in the identification of effective treatment strategies and improvements in patient risk stratification have been reached. A randomized trial demonstrated that neoadjuvant epirubicin and ifosfamide improves survival of patients affected by five high-risk soft tissue sarcoma histologies of trunk and extremities, including undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, myxoid liposarcoma, synovial sarcoma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours, and leiomyosarcoma. Selection of patients for these treatments is expected to be improved by the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system, as it tailors T-stage categories on primary tumour site and considers a prognostic nomogram for retroperitoneal sarcoma, which also includes soft tissue sarcoma histology and other patient and tumour features not directly included in the TNM staging. Within this framework, this article will present neoadjuvant treatment strategies for high-risk soft tissue sarcoma, emphasizing the most recent advances and discussing the need for further research to improve the effectiveness of neoadjuvant treatments.

Looking for answers: the current status of neoadjuvant treatment in localized soft tissue sarcomas

PURPOSE

Sarcomas are a rare and heterogeneous variant of cancer. The standard of care treatment involves surgical resection with radiation in high-risk patients. Despite appropriate treatment approximately 50 % of patients will suffer and die from recurrent disease. The purpose of this article is to review the current evidence concerning the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiation in soft tissue sarcomas.

METHODS

An in-depth literature search was conducted using Ovid Medline and PubMed.

RESULTS

The most active chemotherapeutic agents in sarcoma are anthracyclines and ifosfamide. Adjuvant chemotherapy trials show only minimal benefit. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy offers the potential advantage of reducing the extent of surgery, increasing the limb salvage rate, early exposure of micrometastatic disease to chemotherapy, and assessment of tumor response to chemotherapy. Some retrospective and phase II trials suggest a benefit to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Unfortunately, no clearly positive phase III prospectively randomized trials exist for neoadjuvant therapy in soft tissue sarcomas.

CONCLUSIONS

The current neoadjuvant chemotherapy trials that do exist are heterogeneous resulting in conflicting results. However, neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiation can be considered in patients with high-risk disease in an attempt to improve long-term outcomes.

A novel, validated risk score to predict surgical site infection after pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Although pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) outcomes have improved, complications including surgical site infection (SSI) remain common. We present a stratification tool to predict risk for SSI after PD.

METHODS

Data was retrospectively reviewed on all patients undergoing PD at a tertiary hospital (9/2011-8/2014). Potential SSI risk factors identified by univariate analysis were incorporated into a multivariate logistic regression model. The resulting odds ratios were converted into a point system to create an SSI risk score with internal validation.

RESULTS

Six hundred seventy nine patients underwent PD and were chronologically split into derivation (443 patients) and validation (236 patients) groups. There was no difference in demographics or perioperative outcomes between groups. Overall thirty-day SSI was observed in 17.2% (n = 117). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiation, intraoperative red blood cell transfusion, operative time greater than 7 h, preoperative bile stent/drain, and vascular resection were associated with SSI in univariate analysis (all p < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, preoperative bile stent/drain and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were independent predictors of SSI, each assigned 1 point (both p < 0.001). Patients with 0, 1, and 2 points, respectively, had 0%, 32%, and 64% predicted risk of SSI (AUC = 0.73, R2 = 0.93). The model performed equivalently in the validation group (AUC = 0.77, R2 = 0.99).

CONCLUSION

This novel, validated risk score accurately predicts SSI risk after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Identifying the highest risk patients can help target interventions to reduce SSI.

Practical Issues for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma

Background

Retroperitoneal sarcoma is rare. Using initial specimens on biopsy, a definitive diagnosis of histological subtypes is ideal but not always achievable.

Methods

A retrospective institutional review was performed for all cases of adult retroperitoneal sarcoma from 1996 to 2015. A review of the literature was also performed related to the distribution of retroperitoneal sarcoma subtypes. A meta-analysis was performed.

Results

Liposarcoma is the most common subtype (45%), followed by leiomyosarcoma (21%), not otherwise specified (8%), and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (6%) by literature review. Data from Moffitt Cancer Center demonstrate the same general distribution for subtypes of retroperitoneal sarcoma. A pathology-based algorithm for the diagnosis of retroperitoneal sarcoma is illustrated, and common pitfalls in the pathology of retroperitoneal sarcoma are discussed.

Conclusions

An informative diagnosis of retroperitoneal sarcoma via specimens on biopsy is achievable and meaningful to guide effective therapy. A practical and multidisciplinary algorithm focused on the histopathology is helpful for the management of retroperitoneal sarcoma.

Comparison of postoperative complications in advanced head and neck cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone

Background:

Head and neck cancer is the third most common cancer in India with 60% presenting in advanced stages. There is the emerging role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in the management of these advanced cancers. There is a general perception that complication rates are higher with the use of NACT.

Materials and Methods:

This is a retrospectively collected data of head and neck cancer patients operated at our hospital from March 2013 to September 2014. A total of 205 patients were included in the study. These patients were studied in two groups. Group 1 included 153 patients who underwent surgery alone, and Group 2 included 52 patients who received 2-3 cycles of NACT followed by surgery.

Results:

The mean age of the population was 51 years in the Group 1 and 45 years in Group 2. The hospital stay and readmissions in postoperative period were similar in the two groups. In this study, the complication rate was 37.9% in the surgery patients and 30.8% in the NACT patients (P = 0.424).

Conclusion:

The postoperative complication rates in patients who received NACT followed by surgery were not significantly different from those who underwent surgery.

Long-term Oncologic Outcomes After Neoadjuvant Radiation Therapy for Retroperitoneal Sarcomas

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate long-term survival among patients undergoing radiation therapy (RT), followed by surgical resection of retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS).

BACKGROUND

Despite a lack of level 1 evidence supporting neoadjuvant RT for RPS, its use has increased substantially over the past decade.

METHODS

The 1998-2011 National Cancer Data Base was queried to identify patients who underwent resection of RPS. Subjects were grouped by use of neoadjuvant RT. Perioperative variables and outcomes were compared. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess predictors of neoadjuvant RT. Groups were propensity matched using a 2:1 nearest neighbor algorithm and short-term outcomes were compared. Finally, long-term survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with comparisons based on the log-rank test.

RESULTS

A total of 11,324 patients were identified. Neoadjuvant RT was administered to 696 patients (6.1%). During the study period, preoperative RT use increased from 4% to nearly 15%. Male sex, tumor size larger than 5 cm, treatment at an academic/research program, and higher tumor grade all predicted neoadjuvant RT administration. After propensity matching, the only difference in baseline characteristics was the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Although neoadjuvant RT was associated with a higher rate of negative margins (77.5% vs 73.0%; P = 0.014), there was no corresponding improvement in 5-year survival (53.2% vs 54.2%; P = 0.695).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the increasing use of neoadjuvant RT for patients with RPS, the survival benefit associated with this treatment modality remains unclear. Continued investigation is needed to better define the role of RT among patients with RPS.

Comparative effectiveness research for sarcoma

Modern multidisciplinary management of sarcoma represents several opportunities for comparative effectiveness research. Focusing on the outcomes of survival, quality of life and cost-effectiveness of care, the current state of the art is summarized. Specialized/regional care for sarcoma and the utility of tumor boards or multispecialty discussion is discussed. Issues related to treatment efficacy and sequencing in relation to chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery as well as margin reporting and surveillance are also discussed. Finally, future avenues of comparative effectiveness research for sarcoma are highlighted throughout the chapter.

The effect of neoadjuvant radiation therapy on perioperative outcomes among patients undergoing resection of retroperitoneal sarcomas

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant radiation therapy (RT) has several theoretical benefits in the treatment of retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS), but concerns remain about treatment toxicity and perioperative morbidity. There are limited data regarding its effect on perioperative outcomes, most of which come from small, single-institution series. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term (30-day) postoperative morbidity and mortality associated with neoadjuvant RT following resection of RPS.

METHODS

The 2005-2011 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant User File was queried for patients undergoing RPS resection. Subjects were stratified by use of neoadjuvant RT. Perioperative variables and short-term 30-day outcomes were compared. Groups were then propensity matched using a 2:1 nearest-neighbor algorithm and multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess neoadjuvant RT as a predictor of short-term 30-day outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 785 patients were identified. Neoadjuvant RT was administered to 71 (9.0%). Patients who received neoadjuvant RT were slightly younger (56 vs. 62 years, p < 0.001), but otherwise the groups were similar. After propensity matching, all baseline characteristics were highly similar. Median operative time was longer in the neoadjuvant RT group (279 vs. 219 min, p < 0.01), but there were no differences in mortality (1.4 vs. 2.1%, p = 0.71), major complications (28.2 vs. 25.2%, p = 0.69), overall complications (35.2 vs.33.2%, p = 0.83), early reoperation (5.6 vs. 7.4%, p = 0.81), or length of stay (7 vs. 7 days, p = 0.56). Following further adjustment with logistic regression, we confirmed that there were no differences in 30-day mortality or morbidity between patients who did and did not receive neoadjuvant RT.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant RT does not appear to increase short-term (30-day) morbidity or mortality following resection of RPS. Continued investigation is needed to better define the role for radiation therapy among patients with this disease.

[Operative therapy of abdominal and retroperitoneal sarcoma]

Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas are characterized by a high rate of local recurrence. Complete tumor resection is the only potentially curative therapeutic option. The concept of a systematic compartmental resection is to remove the tumor en bloc with a margin of uninvolved tissue and organs. This is frequently only achieved by multivisceral resection which often includes kidney, colon, pancreas and parts of the diaphragm or the psoas muscle. The adoption of such a policy of multivisceral organ resection improves the proportion of curative resections and, ultimately, results in lower local recurrence rates. The present article comprehensively describes the operative procedures, perioperative treatment and the oncological results of surgery for retroperitoneal sarcomas. The role of surgery in oncological treatment plans and the importance of specialized centres are outlined in detail.

Current concepts in multimodality therapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma

Radical surgical resection currently represents the most effective therapy for patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma. Unfortunately, margin-negative resection often mandates extirpation of multiple retroperitoneal viscera, and such operations are nonetheless fraught with high rates of locoregional recurrence. In an attempt to improve local control and ultimately survival, adjuvant strategies of radiation and chemotherapy have been increasingly employed, with promising results. To date, however, the rarity of the disease has limited large, prospective studies investigating the efficacy of these adjuvant modalities. In this article, we review the current literature pertaining to the diagnosis, staging and treatment of retroperitoneal sarcoma and demonstrate the critical need for future large, multi-institutional studies to advance our knowledge of this uncommon disease.

Current diagnosis and management of retroperitoneal sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Retroperitoneal sarcomas are rare neoplasms that often present with multivisceral involvement. Treatment for these tumors requires careful decision making requiring a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy.

METHODS

We reviewed the scientific literature pertaining to the diagnosis and management of retroperitoneal sarcomas. We also identify recent developments in treatment and discuss future trends in the care of patients with this disease.

RESULTS

Retroperitoneal tumors often present as large, locally advanced lesions. Evaluation of these tumors requires careful consideration of a multimodality approach. Retrospective data and historical prospective series have demonstrated the survival benefit of radical resection for these tumors with en bloc resection of involved structures. Compartmental resections in the retroperitoneum along with debulking of high-grade disease and regional therapy are controversial approaches with significant morbidity that can lead to long-term survival. The application of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies in select tumor histologies may improve local control and survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The management of retroperitoneal sarcomas requires a multidisciplinary approach and is best accomplished at high-volume centers specializing in the care of patients with these complex malignancies. Current data suggest that radical resection remains the only chance for cure and that chemotherapy and radiation therapy may confer a survival benefit.

Isolated limb perfusion for unresectable extremity sarcoma: results of 2 single-institution phase 2 trials

BACKGROUND

Controversy has surrounded the role of isolated limb perfusion (ILP) for unresectable extremity sarcomas. However, there remains a group of sarcoma patients for whom amputation is the only potential treatment. Because systemic therapies are limited, the authors evaluated ILP in an effort to provide a limb-salvage option.

METHODS

Since 1995, patients with unresectable extremity sarcomas were entered in 2 prospective trials using ILP. Study 1 used tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and melphalan in the perfusion circuit at hyperthermic temperatures (39-41°C). Study 2 used doxorubicin at normothermic temperatures. All ILPs were performed using the standard, previously described technique.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients were entered into study 1; there were 10 (58%) partial responses, 1 (6%) near complete response (CR), 1 (6%) CR, and 5 (30%) no response/minor response. Fourteen patients died of their disease, with a median follow-up of 17 months. Seven (41%) patients maintained their limb intact until the time of death. Twelve patients were entered into study 2; there were no partial or CRs and 2 (20%) minor responses. With a median follow-up of 35 months, there are 3 patients alive (2 with their extremity intact and 1 with an amputation). Six patients developed myonecrosis with creatine phosphokinase levels up to 54,000 U/dL.

CONCLUSIONS

Although doxorubicin is active systemically, TNF and melphalan appear to have greater activity and less toxicity during ILP. Future clinical trials are needed to clearly identify the role for ILP in patients with unresectable extremity sarcomas. Cancer 2011. © 2011 American Cancer Society.

Multimodality treatment of locally advanced soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant radiotherapy (RTE) still has a fundamental role as a post-operative treatment of locally advanced soft tissues sarcomas of the extremities. Moreover the employment of combined modalities in locally advanced soft tissues sarcomas of the extremities allow to maximize the chance of local cure even in difficult presentation cases, and possibly improve survival, especially in high-risk disease patients. In patients with sarcomas of the extremities in which definitive surgery has not been radical (with positive or "close" margins) radiotherapy can improve the results in terms of Disease Free Survival (DFS) and, together with chemotherapy, of Overall Survival (OS). We recommend radiotherapy in case of deep tumor location, inadequate surgical margins and grade 3 tumour; for positive or "marginal (or close)" excision (that means inadequate surgery) or in selected patients with a bad prognosis, we believe that a multidisciplinary approach can be preferable.

INTRODUCTION

Adjuvant radiotherapy (RTE) still has a fundamental role as a post-operative treatment. In patients with sarcomas of the extremities in whom definitive surgery has been or not radical (positive or "close" margins), radiotherapy with chemotherapy can improve the results in terms of Disease Free Survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS), while RTE alone seems to improve local control.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 1/2000 to 12/2005 we treated 34 patients affected by locally advanced sarcomas of the upper or lower extremities with radiotherapy (doses ranging from 54 to 66 Gy) and chemotherapy in 18/34 with an adjuvant scheme that consisted in Epirubicine (120 mg/m(2)) plus Ifosfamide (7000-9000 mg/m(2)).

RESULTS

Disease Free Survival (DFS) and the Overall Survival (OS) rates were 76% and 82%, respectively. Eighteen patients developed one or more long-term side effects. Most of these complications were mild: all patients experienced only erithema, edema, local sclerosis or moderate pain.

CONCLUSION

Radiotherapy has an important role as a post-operative treatment also when surgery was non-radical. It improves local control more in patients with high-grade sarcomas of the extremity with positive or close margins. It is still difficult to assess the role of adjuvant chemotherapy.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes of pre- versus postoperative radiation in localized resectable soft-tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND

The goal of this study was to determine the oncologic outcomes in localized resectable soft-tissue sarcoma after pre- versus postoperative radiation.

METHODS

Literature searches through MEDLINE, EMBASE, CancerLit, and the Cochrane Database were performed with the following search terms: sarcoma, radiation, preoperative, and postoperative. Two reviewers independently assessed all eligible publications with the Detsky Quality Scale for Randomized Trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for case-control studies. The primary outcome measure was the pooled odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for the risk of local recurrence calculated through the fixed- and random-effects methods. Time-dependent survival data were calculated as an average across all studies.

RESULTS

Five eligible studies were identified including a total of 1,098 patients. The P value for heterogeneity was 0.259, and the variability (I (2)) in results across studies due to true differences in treatment effect was 25%. The risk for local recurrence was lower in the preoperative group with an odds ratio of 0.61 (95% CI 0.42-0.89) by means of the fixed-effects method, and an odds ratio of 0.67 (95% CI 0.39-1.15) by means of the random-effects method. Average survival was 76% (range 62-88%) in the preoperative group and 67% (range 41-83%) in the post-operative group.

CONCLUSIONS

The delay in surgical resection necessary to complete preoperative radiation does not seem to increase the risk of lethal metastatic spread. The risk of local recurrence may be lower after preoperative radiation. These findings must be interpreted with caution because of the heterogeneity and bias in the available studies.

Sarcomas of the head and neck region

Sarcomas of the head and neck are a heterogeneous group of rare malignancies with highly variable clinical presentation, pathologic classification, and biologic behavior. Managing patients with sarcoma is a formidable challenge for surgical, medical, and radiation oncologists. This article reviews current approaches in patient evaluation, staging, prognosis, and treatment, with emphasis on prolonged survival and quality of life.

Chemotherapeutic management of soft tissue sarcoma

Soft tissue sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of connective tissue tumors, with more than 50 different subtypes. Given the heterogeneity, and the relative small numbers of patients, performing large adequately powered clinical trials in which one can glean any overall broad treatment decisions based on outcome is difficult at best. There is controversy on which chemotherapeutic agents to use in the adjuvant and metastatic settings, or even if to use chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting. In the metastatic setting, doxorubicin and ifosfamide have remained the standards of care for more than 20 years. This review discusses the data on chemotherapy for treatment of metastatic sarcomas and the utility of chemotherapy in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings. In addition, the utility of newer biologic agents in the treatment for sarcomas is considered.

Diagnosis and management of lipomatous tumors

Lipomatous tumors range from benign lipomas to high-grade liposarcomas. Liposarcomas are classified into five histologic subtypes: well-differentiated, dedifferentiated, myxoid, round cell, and pleomorphic, which differ in outcomes and patterns of recurrence. Surgical resection is the mainstay of curative treatment; however, large, high grade liposarcomas may benefit from multimodality treatment with chemotherapy and radiation. A histologic-subtype specific nomogram provides accurate survival predictions. Prospective randomized clinical trials will continue to improve our care of patients with liposarcoma.

Tumors at the Aortoiliac/Inferior Vena Cava Bifurcation: Preoperative, Anesthetic, and Intraoperative Considerations

Primary and recurrent retroperitoneal tumors can involve the aortoiliac vasculature. They are often considered inoperable or incurable because of the locally advanced nature of the disease or the technical aspects involved in safely resecting the lesion. Safe resection of these lesions requires experience and extensive preoperative planning for success. A retrospective database review of 76 patients with retroperitoneal tumors identified tumors involving major vascular structures in the abdomen and pelvis undergoing resection of tumor en bloc with the aortoiliac vasculature. Preoperative planning and intraoperative technical maneuvers are reviewed. Patients were followed until time of this report. Four patients with retroperitoneal tumors involving the aortoiliac vessels underwent surgery: two patients with sarcoma (one primary and one recurrent), one with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, and one with a paraganglioma. All patients had resection of the aorta and vena cava or the iliac artery and vein. Arterial reconstruction (anatomic or extra-anatomic) was performed in all cases. The patient with renal cell carcinoma also required venous reconstruction to support a renal autotransplant. Veno-venous bypass was required in one patient. Local control was achieved in 3 of 4 cases. Surgery for retroperitoneal tumors involving major vascular structures is technically feasible with appropriate planning and technique. Multiple disciplines are required, including general surgical oncology, vascular surgery, and possibly, cardiothoracic surgery.

Locally advanced and metastatic sarcoma (adult type) including gastrointestinal stromal tumors

STS belong to the most challenging diseases in oncology that demand all resources of modern clinical oncology. With the improvement of surgical techniques and radiation therapy the majority of patients with localized disease can be cured. However, for patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease chemotherapeutic treatments have not greatly changed the poor outcome of the disease. The introduction of combined chemoradiotherapy as well as isolated limb-perfusion has improved the limb-salvage rate in locally advanced disease but the impact of systemic chemotherapy on overall survival remains a subject of dispute. For patients with metastatic sarcoma long-term survival can only be achieved in a small number of patients with mostly resectable disease. The list of effective drugs for palliative treatment in general still remains short and the duration of remissions usually does not exceed several months. The lack of alternative chemotherapeutic drugs imposes a considerable challenge in daily clinical practice with many young patients exhibiting a good performance status but progressive disease after standard treatment. A variety of new drugs or drug combinations seem to exhibit considerable activity in certain histological sarcoma subtypes, which may soon broaden the armamentarium of drugs for a subset of patients. However, with the vastly improved understanding of the biology and pathology of soft tissue sarcoma an era of opportunities seems to have begun and the recent success in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors impressively shows how fast a gain in the understanding of oncogenic mechanisms may translate into a highly efficient, clinically useful treatment.

Good outcome after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and extended surgical resection for a large radiation-induced high-grade breast sarcoma

This article is a case report of a high grade, radio-induced, breast malignant fibrous histiocytoma (undifferentiated high grade pleomorphic sarcoma), which developed in a 44-year old female, seven years after breast conservative surgery and radiotherapy for a T1N0M0 invasive left breast ductal carcinoma. The sarcoma presented as a fast growing tumour, 9.5 cm in the largest diameter, with skin, left breast, chest wall muscle and rib invasion.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was performed with epirubicin and ifosfamide. Extended radical surgery according to oncological standards and soft tissue reconstruction were carried out. Despite bad prognostic features of high grade and large invasive sarcoma, the patient is currently, after 44 months of follow up, without local recurrence, or metastases, exceeding the 12.8-month mean recurrence period and mortality rate for these tumours larger than 8.1 cm (± 1.2 cm) as described in the literature.

Adult soft tissue sarcomas: Conventional therapies and molecularly targeted approaches

The therapeutic approach to soft tissue sarcomas (STS) has evolved over the past two decades based on the results from randomized controlled trials, which are guiding physicians in the treatment decision-making process. Despite significant improvements in the control of local disease, a significant number of patients ultimately die of recurrent/metastatic disease following radical surgery due to a lack of effective adjuvant treatments. In addition, the characteristic chemoresistance of STS has compromised the therapeutic value of conventional antineoplastic agents in cases of unresectable advanced/metastatic disease. Therefore, novel therapeutic strategies are urgently needed to improve the prognosis of patients with STS. Recent advances in STS biology are paving the way to the development of molecularly targeted therapeutic strategies, the efficacy of which relies not only on the knowledge of the molecular mechanisms underlying cancer development/progression but also on the personalization of the therapeutic regimen according to the molecular features of individual tumours. In this work, we review the state-of-the-art of conventional treatments for STS and summarize the most promising findings in the development of molecularly targeted therapeutic approaches.

Advances in neoadjuvant chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcomas

The use of adjuvant chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcomas (STS) continues to be an area of controversy; however, the group of investigators favoring the use of an anthracycline- and ifosfamide-based regimen for high-risk (American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III) extremity STS is steadily increasing. The historic 5-year survival rate of approximately 50% in this high-risk group treated with local therapy alone represents a poor standard of care, thus there is a need to incorporate systemic therapy early in the management of these patients. Published data from the meta-analysis of doxorubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy trials and the prospective randomized data with epirubicin and ifosfamide from the Italian Sarcoma Group are frequently used as rationale for this approach. In a rare and heterogenous group of diseases, such as STS, physicians run into negative studies for various reasons that have little to do with the efficacy of the treatment being tested. The wisdom may be in capitalizing further on a positive lead as opposed to nihilism. It is appropriate to acknowledge that the chemotherapeutic agents have limited efficacy and are toxic, especially when used at full therapeutic doses. Selecting patients in whom there is some evidence of benefit, justifying the poor quality of life from receiving chemotherapy, becomes very important. This rationale, with the lessons learned from osteosarcoma research, forms the basis for neoadjuvant chemotherapy for STS. Until we reach the day when we have identified critical tumorigenic targets and their effective inhibitors for most of these tumors, we are obligated to use the available therapeutic armamentarium in the best possible sequence.

The use of chemotherapy in soft-tissue sarcomas

The treatment of advanced soft-tissue sarcomas is often palliative, although a subset of patients may be cured or have a long disease-free interval. This paper reviews the historical data over 30 years of treatment that has led to the use of ifosfamide and doxorubicin as the mainstay in the treatment of metastatic disease. These treatments have a high toxicity, relative to other chemotherapeutic regimens, with median response durations on the order of months. Agents developed in the last few years, whose role in the treatment of sarcomas is still evolving, are discussed as well. Finally, we discuss the role of chemotherapy in combination with surgery and radiation in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings.

Clinical features and outcome of initially unresected nonmetastatic pediatric nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma

PURPOSE

To describe the clinical features, response to therapy, and outcome of pediatric patients with initially unresected nonmetastatic nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma (NRSTS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the presenting clinical features and tumor characteristics of all 40 pediatric patients with initially unresected nonmetastatic NRSTS who were seen at our institution between March 1962 and December 1996. A subset of 27 patients for whom complete treatment information was available was analyzed to determine whether response to therapy was associated with local disease control and event-free and overall survival.

RESULTS

More than 70% of the 40 patients had tumors with high-risk features (tumor size > 5 cm, high grade, invasiveness). For the 27 patients included in the outcome analysis, 5-year event-free survival and survival estimates were 33% +/- 9% and 56% +/- 10%, respectively. Ten (37%) of these patients had a complete or partial response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, and only two of the 10 had residual tumor after surgery. Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy seemed more effective than either modality alone in inducing a response, but the response to neoadjuvant therapy did not predict outcome. Most treatment failures were local, and postrelapse survival was poor (19% +/- 10%).

CONCLUSION

Initially unresected NRSTS constitutes a unique subgroup of pediatric sarcomas that commonly present with high-risk features and respond poorly to neoadjuvant therapy. Only about one third of patients treated with multimodal therapy remain disease-free, and local control is the major limiting factor in achieving cure. More effective risk-directed treatments are needed for this unique subgroup of patients.

Treatment of primary, recurrent or inadequately resected high-risk soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) of adults: results of a phase II pilot study (RHT-95) of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with regional hyperthermia

The efficacy of thermochemotherapy in adult patients with primary, recurrent or inadequately resected non-metastatic high-risk soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) was assessed. 54 patients were prospectively treated with four cycles of etoposide, ifosfamide and doxorubicin (EIA) combined with regional hyperthermia (RHT) followed by surgery, another four cycles of EIA without RHT and external beam radiation. The objective response rate was 16% and at a median follow-up time of 57 months, the 4-year estimated rates of local failure-free survival (LFFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 59% (95% confidence interval (CI) 45-73%), 59% (95% CI 44-73%), 26% (95% CI 14-38%) and 40% (95% CI 27-53%), respectively. OS was in favour of patients responding to neoadjuvant treatment (P=0.073). In comparison to a preceding phase II study including pre- and postsurgical thermochemotherapy (RHT-91), at a 4-year follow-up the RHT-95 study cohort showed an inferior LFFS rate (P=0.027), but this did not affect DMFS (P=0.558) or OS (P=0.126). Hence, postsurgical thermochemotherapy seems critical for local tumour control without affecting survival.