Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan and docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors: preliminary evidence of clinical activity

Optimum multi-drug regime for compartment model of tumour: cell-cycle-specific dynamics in the presence of resistance

This work is focused on multi-objective optimisation of a multi-drug chemotherapy schedule for cell-cycle-specific cancer treatment under the influence of drug resistance. The acquired drug resistance to chemotherapeutic agents is incorporated into the existing compartmental model of breast cancer. Furthermore, the toxic effect of drugs on healthy cells and overall drug concentration in the patient body are also constrained in the proposed model. The objective is to determine the optimal drug schedule according to the patient's physiological condition so that the tumour burden is minimised. A multi-objective optimisation algorithm, non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (NSGA-II) is utilised to solve the problem. The obtained results are thoroughly analysed to illustrate the impact of drug resistance on the treatment. The capability of optimised schedules to deal with parametric uncertainty is also analysed. The drug schedules obtained in this work align well with the clinical standards. It is also revealed that the NSGA-II optimised drug schedule with proper rest period between successive dosages yields the minimum cancer load at the end of the treatment.

Clinical Assessment of 5-Fluorouracil/Leucovorin, Nab-Paclitaxel, and Irinotecan (FOLFIRABRAX) in Untreated Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer Using UGT1A1 Genotype-Guided Dosing

PURPOSE

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin, irinotecan, and nab-paclitaxel are all active agents in gastrointestinal cancers; the combination, FOLFIRABRAX, has not been previously evaluated. UDP Glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) clears SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan. UGT1A1*28 polymorphism reduces UGT1A1 enzymatic activity and predisposes to toxicity. We performed a trial to assess the safety and tolerability of FOLFIRABRAX with UGT1A1 genotype-guided dosing of irinotecan.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with previously untreated, advanced gastrointestinal cancers received FOLFIRABRAX with prophylactic pegfilgrastim every 14 days. UGT1A1 *1/*1, *1/*28, and *28/*28 patients received initial irinotecan doses of 180, 135, and 90 mg/m2, respectively. 5-FU 2,400 mg/m2 over 46 hours, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, and nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 were administered. Doses were deemed tolerable if the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate during cycle 1 was ≤35% in each genotype group. DLTs were monitored using a sequential procedure.

RESULTS

Fifty patients enrolled, 30 pancreatic, 9 biliary tract, 6 gastroesophageal, and 5 others. DLTs occurred in 5 of 23 (22%) *1/*1 patients, 1 of 19 (5%) *1/*28 patients, and 0 of 7 *28/*28 patients. DLTs were all grade 3: diarrhea (3 patients), nausea (2 patients), and febrile neutropenia (1 patient). The overall response rate was 31%. Response rates in pancreatic, gastroesophageal, and biliary tract cancers were 34%, 50%, and 11%, respectively. Eighteen patients (36%) received therapy for at least 24 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

FOLFIRABRAX with genotype-guided dosing of irinotecan is tolerable in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer and UGT1A1*1*1 or UGT1A1*1*28 genotypes. Too few *28/*28 patients were enrolled to provide conclusive results. Responses occurred across multiple tumor types.

Individualization of Irinotecan Treatment: A Review of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacogenetics

Since its clinical introduction in 1998, the topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan has been widely used in the treatment of solid tumors, including colorectal, pancreatic, and lung cancer. Irinotecan therapy is characterized by several dose-limiting toxicities and large interindividual pharmacokinetic variability. Irinotecan has a highly complex metabolism, including hydrolyzation by carboxylesterases to its active metabolite SN-38, which is 100- to 1000-fold more active compared with irinotecan itself. Several phase I and II enzymes, including cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A, are involved in the formation of inactive metabolites, making its metabolism prone to environmental and genetic influences. Genetic variants in the DNA of these enzymes and transporters could predict a part of the drug-related toxicity and efficacy of treatment, which has been shown in retrospective and prospective trials and meta-analyses. Patient characteristics, lifestyle and comedication also influence irinotecan pharmacokinetics. Other factors, including dietary restriction, are currently being studied. Meanwhile, a more tailored approach to prevent excessive toxicity and optimize efficacy is warranted. This review provides an updated overview on today’s literature on irinotecan pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenetics.

Drug-Drug Interactions in Prostate Cancer Treatment

Polypharmacy is associated with an increased risk of drug-drug interactions (DDIs), which can cause serious and debilitating drug-induced adverse events. With a steadily aging population and associated increasing multimorbidity and polypharmacy, the potential for DDIs becomes considerably important. Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer in men and occurs mostly in elderly men in the Western world. Therefore, the aim of this review is to give an overview of DDIs in PCa therapy to better understand pharmacodynamic and pharm kinetic side effects as well as their interactions with other medications. Last, we explore potential future strategies, which might help to optimize treatment and reduce adverse events patients with polypharmacy and PCa.

Randomized Phase II Trial of Irinotecan/Docetaxel or Irinotecan/Docetaxel Plus Cetuximab for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study

Objectives:

The primary objective was to determine the response rate in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer treated in first line with irinotecan/docetaxel combination (Arm A) or with irinotecan/docetaxel/cetuximab combination (Arm B). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), toxicity, and the rate of thromboembolic events with prophylactic enoxaparin sodium.

Patients and Methods:

Patients were eligible who had measurable, metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, and normal bilirubin. All patients received anticoagulation. Docetaxel (35 mg/m²) and irinotecan (50 mg/m²) were administered once a week for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks rest (Arm A) alone or with the addition of cetuximab (Arm B). The primary endpoint was response rate.

Results:

A total of 87 eligible patients were enrolled and treated. Grade 3/4 toxicity was observed in 74% of patients in Arm A and 76% in Arm B. The principal grade 3/4 toxicity was diarrhea. Response rates were 4.5% in Arm A and 7% in Arm B. Median PFS and OS were 3.9 and 6.5 months in Arm A and 4.5 and 5.4 months in Arm B.

Conclusions:

Docetaxel/irinotecan combination is associated with considerable toxicity. Objective responses were infrequent and addition of cetuximab in an unselected population was not beneficial, but PFS and OS were comparable with those achieved with other regimens. Docetaxel/irinotecan therapy is active in metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Inter-patient variability in docetaxel pharmacokinetics: A review

Docetaxel is a frequently used chemotherapeutic agent in the treatment of solid cancers. Because of the large inter-individual variability (IIV) in the pharmacokinetics (PK) of docetaxel, it is challenging to determine the optimal dose in individual patients in order to achieve optimal efficacy and acceptable toxicity. Despite the established correlation between systemic docetaxel exposure and efficacy, the precise factors influencing docetaxel PK are not yet completely understood. This review article highlights currently known factors that influence docetaxel PK, and focusses on those that are clinically relevant. For example, liver impairment should be taken into account when calculating docetaxel dosages as this may decrease docetaxel clearance. In addition, drug-drug interactions may be of distinct clinical importance when using docetaxel. Particularly, drugs strongly inhibiting CYP3A4 such as ketoconazole should not be concurrently administered without dose modification, as they may decrease the clearance of docetaxel. Gender, castration status, and menopausal status might be of importance as potential factors influencing docetaxel PK. The role of pharmacogenetics in predicting docetaxel PK is still limited, since no polymorphisms of clinical importance have yet been established.

Gemcitabine and docetaxel for hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase II North Central Cancer Treatment Group clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

Few effective options are available for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Several phase I trials suggest promising activity of a combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel.

METHODS

Patients with unresectable or metastatic HCC were treated with docetaxel 40 mg/m (later reduced to 30 mg/m) and gemcitabine 800 mg/m on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Twenty-five patients were enrolled in 26 months. Median age was 64 (range, 27-078), 17 were male, 14 had liver-only disease, and 11 had extrahepatic disease.

RESULTS

Of 25 patients evaluable for the primary end point (response), 2 (8%) have a confirmed partial response. The median time to progression is 2.76 months (95% confidence interval, 1.84-6.64 mo). Median survival was 12.8 months (95% confidence interval, 5.26-28.00). Two patients died on study owing to adverse events (1 hepatic and 1 renal failure), neither of which were attributed to the study medications. Twenty patients (81%) have experienced grade 3+ adverse events, including 11 with grade 4+ adverse events, primarily neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, and fatigue.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this combination seems to have potential benefit, as measured by overall survival, its toxicity and the recent introduction of sorafenib has further limited the use of chemotherapy. Approaches other than chemotherapy are likely to be of the greatest potential benefit.

N0332 phase 2 trial of weekly irinotecan hydrochloride and docetaxel in refractory metastatic breast cancer: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) Trial

BACKGROUND

Because of the single-agent activity of irinotecan hydrochloride, combination of irinotecan and docetaxel treatment against metastatic breast cancer (MBC) should be evaluated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Single-stage phase 2 study of irinotecan and docetaxel to evaluate tumor response, toxicity, time to progression, and overall survival was carried out. Regimen of docetaxel (25 mg/m(2)) and irinotecan (70 mg/m(2)) was administered on days 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle. Patients had histologically confirmed breast adenocarcinoma and metastatic cancer measurable with RECIST.

RESULTS

Of 70 patients enrolled, 64 were assessable. Prior treatment with an anthracycline and a taxane was required. Eighteen (28%) patients [95% confidence interval (CI) 15% to 31%] had tumor response, plus four patients had stable disease (less than 30% decrease in sum of longest diameter and less than 20% increase) for >6 months. The clinical benefit rate was 34% overall. Median duration of tumor response was 6.7 months (95% CI 4.2-37.7 months); median follow-up was 18.6 months (range 8.5-37.7 months). The most common severe adverse events included fatigue [n = 16 (25%)] and neutropenia [n = 13 (20%)].

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly dosing of combination of irinotecan and docetaxel is active against MBC. However, the response rate to our regimen was not significantly better than single-agent docetaxel. Other schedules of irinotecan plus docetaxel should be considered for future studies.

Phase II trial of docetaxel-irinotecan combination in advanced esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Preclinical evidence suggests synergy between docetaxel and irinotecan, two drugs active in esophagogastric cancer. We previously demonstrated the safety of docetaxel 35 mg/m2 and irinotecan 50 mg/m2 given on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day schedule.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who had unresectable/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of zero to two, and normal bilirubin were eligible. Tumor assessment was carried out every three cycles.

RESULTS

We enrolled 29 chemotherapy-naive (CN) and 15 chemotherapy-exposed (CE) eligible patients. Principal toxic effects were diarrhea, neutropenia, and hyperglycemia. There were no toxic deaths. There was one early death, from myocardial infarction. Among 26 CN and assessable patients, there were seven (26.9%) with a partial response (PR) and one (3.8%) with a complete response (CR). There were two PRs and one CR among the patients with CE disease. Median time to progression for CN patients was 4.0 months and for CE patients 3.5 months. Median survival for CN eligible patients was 9.0 months and for CE patients 11.4 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Docetaxel-irinotecan combination given on a weekly x 2 of 3 schedule is promising in the treatment of advanced esophageal cancer.

Is irinotecan plus docetaxel useful as second-line therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer?

INTRODUCTION

The ability of doublet therapy in the second-line setting in patients with platinum-refractory non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not yet been proven. In this setting, docetaxel (D) has shown efficacy and irinotecan (I) has only recently been introduced. This study was initiated to explore the activity and tolerability of three D + I regimens in platinum pretreated NSCLC patients.

METHODS

From March 2003 to June 2006, 65 patients (age range, 39-71 years; 83% male) with relapsed stage III/IV NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive either I 160 mg/m(2) plus D 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 21 days (arm A), I 80 mg/m(2) on days 1,8 plus D 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 21 days (arm B), or I 60 mg/m(2) plus D 30 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 every 42 days (arm C), for a maximum of 18 weeks.

RESULTS

Per protocol analysis (47 of 65) overall response rates were 5.6% (A), 6.7% (B), and 7.1% (C). Median times to progression were 3.4, 4.0, and 4.3 months, respectively. Overall survival was 8.9 (A), 8.3 (B), and 9.4 (C) months. G3/4 neutropenia was more frequent in arms A (42%) and B (55%) whereas G3/4 nonhematologic toxicity was similarly prevalent in all arms, although diarrhea occurred in 47% of arm C patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-agent treatment with D or the multitarget antifolate pemetrexed or erlotinib remain the best choices and investigational studies, following first-line therapy, are required.

Excess toxicity associated with docetaxel and irinotecan in patients with metastatic, gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer: results of a phase II study

BACKGROUND

No therapeutic standard of care exists for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who progress following first-line treatment with a gemcitabine-based regimen. There is evidence of synergistic activity between docetaxel and irinotecan, and the combination of these two agents has shown promising efficacy in the first-line setting for advanced pancreatic cancer. We, therefore, evaluated this regimen in patients with gemcitabine-refractory disease.

METHODS

Eligible patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were required to have an elevated serum CA19-9 (> 2x ULN) and exposure to one or two prior chemotherapy regimens, including one gemcitabine-based. Treatment consisted of docetaxel 65 mg/m2 and irinotecan 160 mg/m2, both administered every 21 days. Serum CA19-9 levels were measured at the start of each treatment cycle and CT scans performed after every two cycles.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were enrolled before the study was closed due to excess toxicity. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia/leukopenia, nausea and vomiting, and diarrhea. Fully half of patients received only 1 treatment cycle, with a median time to treatment failure of 36 days. No objective responses were observed, although 3 patients had stable disease for at least 6 cycles. Overall survival for the entire cohort was 134 days, with a 6-month survival rate of 36%.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of docetaxel and irinotecan given on a 21-day cycle is associated with excess toxicity in gemcitabine-refractory patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Although select patients may benefit from treatment, the overall risk:benefit ratio is unfavorable, and other dosing regimens and therapeutic options should be explored in this setting.

Phase II trial of weekly docetaxel/irinotecan combination in advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Docetaxel and irinotecan have activity in pancreatic cancer. The combination of docetaxel and irinotecan is attractive because of preclinical evidence of synergy between the two drugs. We have previously demonstrated the safety of docetaxel 35 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 50 mg/m(2) given on days 1, 8, 15, and 21 of a 35-day schedule.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who had unresectable or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, bidimensionally measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2, and normal bilirubin levels were eligible. Tumor assessment was performed with computed tomography, computed tomographic angiography, or magnetic resonance imaging every 2 cycles. Response was graded according to World Health Organization criteria.

RESULTS

We enrolled 37 eligible patients. Principal grade 3/4 toxicities were diarrhea (21%), neutropenia (30%), and hyperglycemia (30%). There were 3 patients with febrile neutropenia and no toxic deaths. There were 4 early deaths. Among 36 evaluable patients, 9 (24%) attained a partial response and 1 (3%) attained a complete response for an objective response rate of 27%. One patient enrolled because she had been deemed to have unresectable disease but then underwent resection with negative margins after attaining a confirmed partial response. Median survival for all eligible patients is 9.4 months (range 0-68+ months) with minimum follow-up for surviving patients of 23.4 months. One-year survival is 43%. The patient who attained a complete response is alive with recurrent disease at 68 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The docetaxel/irinotecan combination given on a weekly schedule is an active treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer.

Exatecan in pretreated adult patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma: results of a phase II--study of the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group

No standard treatment is established for patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma after previous chemotherapy with anthracyclines and ifosfamide, given either in combination or sequentially. Exatecan (DX-8951f) is a totally synthetic analogue of the topoisomerase I-inhibitor camptothecin, which was synthesised to impart increased aqueous solubility, greater tumour efficacy, and less toxicity than camptothecin itself, topotecan or irinotecan. Since some activity against soft tissue sarcomas, especially leiomyosarcomas, has been reported for topoisomerase I-inhibitors, a study with a new and more potent agent seemed justified. We report on a prospective multicentre phase II study of Exatecan in adult soft tissue sarcomas failing 1 or 2 lines of chemotherapy in advanced phase, performed within the STBSG of EORTC. Thirty-nine patients (16 leiomyosarcomas and 23 other histologies) were included in two independent strata and received a total of 141 cycles (median 2). Median age was 61 years, range 25-76. Exatecan was given as i.v. infusion over 30 min at a dose of 0.5mg/m2 every day for five consecutive days, repeated every 21 days. Seventy-four percentage of cycles could be given without dose or schedule modification. The main toxicity was haematotoxicity with grade 3/4 neutropenia in 49%, grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in 23%, and grade 3/4 anaemia in 15% of patients, respectively. Non-haematological toxicity consisted mainly of grade 2/3 dyspnoea in 36% of patients and grade 2/3 fatigue in 28%. One treatment-related toxic death due to septic shock was reported. Best overall response was no change with 60% in the leiomyosarcoma group and 53% in the non-leiomysarcoma group, respectively. The 3 months progression-free survival estimates are 56% for leiomysarcomas and 26% for other histologies, respectively. Using a two-step statistical design, the trial was stopped after the first step in both strata, due to lack of activity. In pretreated soft tissue sarcoma patients, Exatecan is well tolerated but does not achieve any objective responses. However, with respect to progression-free survival, Exatecan did show some activity in leiomyosarcomas.

Phase II study of biweekly administration of docetaxel and irinotecan in patients with refractory or relapsed advanced non-small cell lung cancer

We examined the safety and efficacy of the combination of docetaxel and irinotecan administered biweekly in patients with refractory or relapsed advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with previously treated NSCLC of stage III or IV were eligible if they had a performance status of 2 or less, were 75 years or younger, and had adequate organ function. From May 2003 through February 2006, 35 patients (27 men and 8 women; median age 64 years; age range 41-75 years) were enrolled. Patients were treated every 4 weeks with docetaxel (33 mg/m(2) on days 2 and 16) plus irinotecan (50 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 15). None of the 35 patients achieved a complete response, but five achieved a partial response, for an overall response rate of 14.3% (95% confidence interval, 4.8-30.3%). The median survival time was 8 months (range 2-29 months). The median time to progression was 3 months (range 1-12 months). Grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicities included leukopenia in 48.6% of patients, neutropenia in 54.3%, and anemia in 25.7%. No patients had grade 3 to 4 diarrhea or nausea and vomiting. Although one patient had grade 3 drug-induced interstitial pneumonia, all side effects were manageable, and there were no treatment-related deaths. In conclusion, the combination of docetaxel and irinotecan administered biweekly is a safe and effective treatment for refractory or relapsed NSCLC. However, the search for even more active regimens should be continued.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of docetaxel, irinotecan, and celecoxib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

We studied the toxicities, potential pharmacokinetic interactions, and preliminary antitumor activity of the combination of docetaxel and irinotecan with celecoxib, a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had advanced non-small lung cancer (NSCLC) with measurable disease, good performance status, and adequate end organ function. Docetaxel and irinotecan were administered intravenously on days 1 and 8, every 21 days, and their doses were escalated on successive patient cohorts at three dose levels: 30/50, 30/60, and 35/60 (doses in mg/m2). Celecoxib was administered at a starting dose of 400 mg orally twice daily without interruption, beginning on day 2 of cycle 1. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed on day 1 of cycle 1 and day 1 of cycle 2.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients with advanced NSCLC were enrolled and collectively received 78 cycles of therapy. Diarrhea was the most common toxicity; it was noted in 13 patients (76%). Dose-limiting toxicities occurred at dose level 1 (myocardial infarction in a patient with multiple coronary artery disease risk factors) and dose level 3 (grade 4 neutropenia with fatal urosepsis). Other major toxicities were: grade 3 neutropenia (2 patients); grade 3/4 diarrhea (3/1); grade 3 nausea (2); grade 2 rash (1); and grade 3 pneumonitis (1). The maximum tolerated dose was at dose level 3, i.e., docetaxel 35 mg/m2 and irinotecan 60 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, plus celecoxib 400 mg twice daily, repeated every 21 days. Five of 15 evaluable patients achieved an objective response. The pharmacokinetics of docetaxel were not altered by celecoxib. However, we observed an 18% increase in the average elimination clearance of irinotecan coincident with the addition of celecoxib.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of celecoxib to docetaxel and irinotecan was generally well tolerated but unpredictable fatal toxicity occurred. Diarrhea was the most common toxicity. Antitumor activity was promising. The alteration of irinotecan pharmacokinetic parameters observed may not be clinically relevant.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of docetaxel : recent developments

Docetaxel belongs to the class of taxane antineoplastic agents that act by inducing microtubular stability and disrupting the dynamics of the microtubular network. The drug has shown a broad spectrum of antitumour activity in preclinical models as well as clinically, with responses observed in various disease types, including advanced breast cancer and non-small cell lung cancer. The pharmacokinetics and metabolism of docetaxel are extremely complex and have been the subject of intensive investigation in recent years. Docetaxel is subject to extensive metabolic conversion by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A isoenzymes, which results in several pharmacologically inactive oxidation products. Elimination routes of docetaxel are also dependent on the presence of drug-transporting proteins, notably P-glycoprotein, present on the bile canalicular membrane. The various processes mediating drug elimination, either through metabolic breakdown or excretion, impact substantially on interindividual variability in drug handling. Strategies to individualise docetaxel administration schedules based on phenotypic or genotype-dependent differences in CYP3A expression are underway and may ultimately lead to more selective chemotherapeutic use of this agent.

Phase II study of irinotecan and docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer: an Alpe-Adria Thoracic Oncology Multidisciplinary group study (ATOM 007)

This study was designed to evaluate the activity and tolerability of irinotecan and docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Eligibility included recurrent or progressive NSCLC, previous chemotherapy, age > or = 18 years, ECOG PS < or = 2. Treatment consisted of irinotecan (160 mg/m2 i.v.), followed by docetaxel (65 mg/m2 i.v.) on day 1 of a 21-day cycle, for a maximum of 6 cycles. Forty patients were enrolled. Median age was 60 years and median ECOG PS was 1. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 31 (78%) were evaluable for response. A total of 125 cycles was administered (median, 3; range, 1-6). Most common grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (62%), neutropenic fever (22%), and diarrhea (32%). Response rate was 10%; a further 40% of patients achieved stable disease. All responses were observed in patients with ECOG PS < or = 1, age <70 years, and who had received only one prior chemotherapy regimen. Median time to progression was 2.8 months and median survival was 7.4 months. Because of significant toxicity and limited activity, further investigation of irinotecan plus docetaxel in second line NSCLC is not recommended.

Front-line paclitaxel and irinotecan combination chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase I-II trial

Our purpose was to determine the efficacy of irinotecan plus paclitaxel administered on day 1, repeated every 2 weeks, in untreated patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In total, 56 patients with inoperable or metastatic stage III and IV NSCLC with a histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis were enrolled. None of the patients had undergone prior chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Treatment involved irinotecan 125 mg m⁻² and paclitaxel 135 mg m⁻² administered on day 1 and repeated every 2 weeks for a planned number of nine cycles. With a standard dose of paclitaxel at 135 mg m⁻², the dosage of irinotecan was escalated at four levels: 75, 100, 125 and 150 mg m⁻²; 125 mg m⁻² was established as the maximum tolerated dose; this dosage was administered to 46 patients. A total of 52 patients (median age 65 years, range 38–77 years) were assessable for toxicity and survival and 46 for response rate. Out of 46 evaluable patients, 19 achieved partial response (41.3%), 17 had stable disease (37%) and 10 (21.7%) experienced disease progression. The median duration of response was 6 months (range 2–9+ months). The main adverse reactions were myelotoxicity (grades 3 and 4) in 10 (19.2%) patients and diarrhoea (grade 3) in four (7.7%) patients. Irinotecan combined with paclitaxel, administered every 2 weeks, appears to be an effective treatment for advanced-stage NSCLC.

Front-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with irinotecan and docetaxel: A multicentre phase II study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of the irinotecan plus docetaxel combination in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-nine chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC were treated with irinotecan 200mg/m2 followed by docetaxel 80 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (150 microg/m2) support from day 2 to 9. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

A partial response was achieved in 9 (23%; 95% confidence interval 9.85-36.3%) patients; stable and progressive disease were observed in 10 (25.6%) and 20 (51.4%) patients, respectively. The median duration of response was 7.1 months and the median time to tumor progression 3 months. The median survival time was 10.8 months and the 1-year survival 42.2%. Four (10.3%) patients developed grade 4 neutropenia and all but one were complicated with fever; there was no treatment-related death. Nine (23.1%) patients developed grade 3 or 4 diarrhea while grade 2 or 3 fatigue occurred in nine (23.1%), and grade 3 mucositis in two (2.6%).

CONCLUSION

The combination of irinotecan/docetaxel is a relatively active non-platinum-based chemotherapy regimen with manageable toxicity, which could be given in an outpatient basis; this regimen merits to be further studied in order to improve its tolerance and evaluate its clinical relevance in patients who can not tolerate platinum-based doublets.

Biweekly docetaxel-irinotecan treatment with filgrastim support is highly active in antracycline-Paclitaxel-refractory breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility and activity of combination treatment with docetaxel (DTX) and irinotecan (CPT-11), given together every other week, combined with filgrastim support, in anthracycline- and paclitaxel-pretreated breast cancer (BC) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Advanced BC patients pretreated with anthracycline- and paclitaxel-based chemotherapy were eligible. DTX (80 mg/m2) and CPT-11 (100 mg/m2) were given biweekly with filgrastim support (300 microg/day on days 4-7).

RESULTS

Fifty patients (48 with metastatic and 2 with locally advanced cancer) were enrolled, with a total of 318 cycles being delivered. Thirty-one patients had visceral localizations. All patients had received epirubicin plus paclitaxel, with or without cisplatin, as front-line treatment for advanced disease. Overall, fatigue and diarrhea were the main chemotherapy-related toxicities in this study, being severe in 10 (20%) and 4 (8%) patients. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 18 (36%) and 6 (12%) patients, respectively. Red blood cell transfusions were required in 4 patients. A total of 32 objective responses were registered (overall response rate, ORR = 64%, 95% confidence interval = 49-77%), including 8 complete responses (16%). An additional 8 patients showed stable disease. After a median follow-up of 18 (range 4-29) months, 30 patients were still alive, and 19 were progression free; median progression-free and overall survivals were 10 and 23 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Biweekly DTX/CPT-11 with G-CSF support is a well-tolerated and highly effective approach in anthracycline-/paclitaxel-pretreated patients. The very promising ORR and survival outcome observed in this subset of patients with a poor prognosis suggest that this regimen might play a major role in the management of this disease.

A phase I trial of celecoxib in combination with docetaxel and irinotecan in patients with advanced cancer

PURPOSE

This phase I study was conducted to determine the safety, tolerability and maximum tolerated dose of the combination of celecoxib, a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, with docetaxel and irinotecan, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with solid tumors received one of three escalating dose levels of daily celecoxib in combination with docetaxel and irinotecan administered on days 1 and 8 of an every 21-day cycle. Toxicities were graded by the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI CTC) and recorded as maximum grade per patient for each treatment cycle.

RESULTS

A total of 19 patients received 90 cycles of treatment through three dose levels. Dose-limiting toxicities were nausea and diarrhea. The most common treatment-related toxicities in all cycles of treatment were alopecia, fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, anemia, anorexia, and edema.. The maximum tolerated dose was established at celecoxib 400 mg twice a day continuously, weekly docetaxel 30 mg/m2 and irinotecan 50 mg/m2 for 2 weeks every 21 days. Disease stabilization (five or more cycles) was documented in eight patients.

CONCLUSION

The combination of celecoxib with docetaxel and irinotecan did not ameliorate irinotecan-induced diarrhea. Although prolonged disease stabilization was achieved in some patients, we do not recommend combining celecoxib with docetaxel and irinotecan because of lack of activity and the side effect profile of this combination.

Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic trial of docetaxel and irinotecan administered on a weekly schedule

BACKGROUND

Docetaxel and irinotecan are synergistic agents with a broad spectrum of activity but overlapping myelosuppression. The study was designed to maintain dose intensity while limiting myelosuppression. The objectives of this study were to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination of docetaxel and irinotecan administered weekly for four consecutive weeks every 42 days, to describe toxicities of this regimen, and to perform a pharmacokinetic analysis to evaluate changes in drug disposition as a function of dose as well as repeated dosing.

METHODS

Adult patients with advanced solid tumors were treated with docetaxel followed by irinotecan. Doses of 30/50, 35/50, 35/66, 30/57, 30/65, 30/80 mg/m(2), respectively, were studied. Pharmacokinetics of docetaxel, irinotecan and SN-38 in plasma were determined on days 1 and 22 by a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay.

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients were treated. The MTD was docetaxel 30 mg/m(2) plus irinotecan 65 mg/m(2). Diarrhea was the dose-limiting toxicity; myelosuppression and other non-hematological toxicities were uncommon and mild. There were no significant differences in pharmacokinetic parameters between day 1 and day 22 (n=20). Five objective responses (breast, stomach and unknown primary) were observed among 30 evaluable patients. In addition, eight patients achieved stable disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of weekly docetaxel and irinotecan is a well tolerated regimen and should be explored in phase II trials. This schedule maintains dose intensity and has limited myelosuppression.

Docetaxel in the Treatment of Esophageal Cancer

Esophageal cancer is the ninth most common malignancy in the world and the seventh leading cause of death in American men. Because symptoms are often intermittent and vague, patients typically present at an advanced stage, with limited survival. In operable patients, standard care includes surgery with or without adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy; chemotherapy and radiotherapy is the standard care for inoperable disease. Docetaxel, a taxane that promotes polymerization of tubules and inhibits depolymerization of microtubules, has shown in vitro and in vivo antitumor effects on human gastric cell lines and gastric cancer xenografts. These antitumor effects have led to the evaluation of docetaxel as a single agent and in combination with other agents and modalities in patients with esophageal cancer. Results of relevant trials are reviewed herein.

A randomised phase II trial of docetaxel vs docetaxel and irinotecan in patients with stage IIIb-IV non-small-cell lung cancer who failed first-line treatment

Response rate and toxicity of second-line therapy with docetaxel (75 mg m⁻²) or docetaxel, irinotecan, and lenogastrim (60 mg m⁻², 200 mg m⁻², and 150 μg m⁻² day⁻¹, respectively) were compared in 108 patients with stage IIIb–IV non-small-cell lung cancer. Addition of irinotecan to docetaxel does not improve response rate, and increases gastrointestinal toxicity.

Salvage chemotherapy with mitomycin, docetaxel, and irinotecan (MDI regimen) in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a phase I and II trial

BACKGROUND

This study evaluates the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and activity of mitomycin, docetaxel, and irinotecan (MDI) regimen on metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, previously treated with gemcitabine-containing chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with less than 76 years, Karnofsky performance status > or = 60, and adequate bone marrow, kidney, and liver function were eligible for this trial. Treatment consisted of mitomycin 6 mg/m2 day 1, docetaxel and irinotecan on days 2 and 8 with escalating doses, every 4 weeks. Dose levels were level 1:30 and 70 mg/m2; level 2:30 and 100 mg/m2; level 3:30 and 85 mg/m2; and level 4:35 and 85 mg/m2. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 4 neutropenia > 7 days, febrile neutropenia, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, nausea and vomiting, or diarrhea, grade > or = 3 nonhematological toxicity, or failure to recover to grade < or = 1 toxicity by day 43, occurring during the first cycle of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Between September 2001 and October 2002, 15 eligible patients, three of whom had been previously treated with two lines of chemotherapy, received 33 cycles of MDI. Toxicity consisted of grade 3 to 4 neutropenia in 23% of cycles, fatigue, diarrhea, and vomiting in 10% of cycles, and one toxic death. DLT was observed in 2 of 6 level 2 patients (one toxic death and one grade 3 fatigue), and 2 of 3 level 4 patients (one neutropenic fever and one grade 3 fatigue). Thirteen patients were assessable for response. No objective response was observed among patients treated with MTD or higher doses. Three patients had stable disease; all other patients had progressive disease. The median time to tumor progression and median survival was 1.7 and 6.1 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The MTD was mitomycin 6 mg/m2 day one, and docetaxel 30 and irinotecan 85 mg/m2 days 2 and 8. This regimen is inactive in metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Biweekly administration of 24-h infusion of irinotecan followed by a 1-h infusion of docetaxel: a phase I study

We developed a chemotherapy combination regimen based on preclinical data suggesting synchronization of cancer cells in G2/M phase when exposed to irinotecan over a protracted period. This phase I study aimed to determine the toxicity spectrum, and define the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended optimal dose (ROD) of irinotecan infused over 24 h and followed by a 1-h infusion of 30 mg/m2 docetaxel. Starting dose for irinotecan was 30 mg/m2 and escalation proceeded at 30 mg/m2 increments, in cohorts of three to six patients until the MTD was reached. A dose between the MTD and the previous level was explored to further define the ROD. Thirty-two patients with advanced refractory cancers (median age 64, 19 male) received 190 treatment courses at five dosing levels of irinotecan: 30 mg/m2 (n=6 patients), 60 (n=3), 90 (n=7), 120 (n=8) and 105 (n=8). The MTD and ROD was 120/30 and 105/30 mg/m2. DLTs were diarrhea and neutropenia. Antitumor activity was modest. The ROD of biweekly administration of 24-h irinotecan followed by 1-h docetaxel is 105 and 30 mg/m2, respectively. The low hematological toxicity and modest activity observed leave questions concerning the optimal timing of this combination.

Weekly regimen of irinotecan/docetaxel in previously treated non-small cell lung cancer patients and correlation with uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) polymorphism

PURPOSE

Inherited variations in drug metabolizing enzymes may influence drug efficacy. This phase II study assesses the impact of second-line weekly irinotecan (CPT-11)/docetaxel in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, and gauges the uridine diphosphate glucuronosyl transferase (UGT1A1) polymorphism influence in toxicity and antitumor activity.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Fifty-one patients with NSCLC treated with at least one prior chemotherapy regimen were enrolled. Patients received irinotecan 70 mg/m(2) followed by docetaxel 25 mg/m(2). Both drugs were given on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. UGT1A1 polymorphism were analyzed in blood samples of 47 patients. The UGT1A1 polymorphism are classified according to the number of TA repeats in the promoter region of this gene.

RESULTS

Three patients (6%) achieved a partial response and nineteen patients (37%) had stable disease. Median survival was 8 months (95% CI: 4.8-11.2) and 1-year survival 30%. Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity was low (less than 10% of patients); 15% of patients had grade 3 asthenia and 25% of patients had grade 3/4 diarrhea. The frequency of UGT1A1 genotypes was as follows: 6/6 49%, 6/7 36%, and 7/7 15%. No differences in toxicity were observed according to UGT1A1 polymorphism. A nonsignificant improvement in time to progression (4 vs. 3 months) and median survival (11 vs. 8 months) was detected in patients with the variant alleles (6/7 and 7/7).

CONCLUSIONS

This weekly irinotecan/docetaxel regimen has shown an acceptable toxicity profile while encouraging median and 1-year survival in heavily pretreated NSCLC patients. The tendency to better prognosis in patients carrying the variant genotypes 6/7 and 7/7 of UGT1A1 gene requires further validation.

Comparative pharmacokinetics of weekly and every-three-weeks docetaxel

PURPOSE

Weekly administration of docetaxel has demonstrated comparable efficacy together with a distinct toxicity profile with reduced myelosuppression, although pharmacokinetic data with weekly regimens are lacking. The comparative pharmacokinetics of docetaxel during weekly and once every 3 weeks (3-weekly) administration schedules were evaluated.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Forty-six patients received weekly docetaxel (35 mg/m(2)) as a 30-min infusion alone (n = 8) or in combination with irinotecan (n = 12), or in 3-weekly regimens, as a 1-h infusion at 60 mg/m(2) with doxorubicin (n = 10), 75 mg/m(2) alone (n = 9), or 100 mg/m(2) alone (n = 7). Serial blood samples were obtained immediately before and up to 21 days after the infusion. Plasma concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and analyzed by compartmental modeling.

RESULTS

Mean +/- SD docetaxel clearance values were similar with weekly and 3-weekly schedules (25.2 +/- 7.7 versus 23.7 +/- 7.9 liter/h/m(2)); half-lives were also similar with both schedules of administration (16.5 +/- 11.2 versus 17.6 +/- 7.4 h). With extended plasma sampling beyond 24 h post-infusion, docetaxel clearance was 18% lower and the terminal half-life was 5-fold longer. At 35 mg/m(2), the mean +/- SD docetaxel concentration on day 8 was 0.00088 +/- 0.00041 microg/ml (1.08 +/- 0.51 nM) at 75 mg/m(2), concentrations on day 8, 15, and 22 were 0.0014 +/- 0.00043 microg/ml (1.79 +/- 0.53 nM), 0.00067 +/- 0.00025 microg/ml (0.83 +/- 0.31 nM), and 0.00047 +/- 0.00008 microg/ml (0.58 +/- 0.099 nM), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Docetaxel pharmacokinetics are similar for the weekly and 3-weekly regimens. Prolonged circulation of low nanomolar concentrations of docetaxel may contribute to the mechanism of action of docetaxel through suppression of microtubule dynamics and tumor angiogenesis and enhanced cell radiosensitivity in combined modality therapy.

Epirubicin, cisplatin, and protracted infusion of 5-FU (ECF) in advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

PURPOSE

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma usually presents late in the clinical course and has a poor prognosis. No effective systemic therapy is currently available. This study aimed to determine the efficacy and toxicity of the ECF regimen (epirubicin, cisplatin. and 24-h continuous infusion of 5-FU) in advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

On day 1, epirubicin 50 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) were administered i.v., repeated every 21 days. 5-FU (200 mg/m(2)/day was given continuous i.v. via an ambulatory infusion pump throughout the treatment course. A total of 24 patients (15 men and nine women) with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma between August 1996 and April 2002 were enrolled in this study.

RESULTS

Of the 20 evaluable patients, two had partial response (10%) and nine had stable disease (45%), including two minor response. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in six patients, while grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was seen in five patients. There was no neutropenic infection or thrombocytopenic bleeding during any of the cycles of chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

ECF regimen is well-tolerated but is not an effective treatment for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Newer clinical trials with combination drugs should be developed.

Irinotecan and taxane combinations for non small-cell lung cancer

Based on nonoverlapping toxicity profiles and at least additive cytotoxicity in preclinical models, chemo-therapy regimens have been developed that feature the combination of irinotecan and a taxane drug. In the first study, the optimal doses of paclitaxel and irinotecan were 75 mg/m2 and 50 mg/m2, respectively, when chemotherapy was administered weekly for 4 consecutive weeks, followed by a 2-week rest. The dose-limit-ing toxicity for this regimen was neutropenia, and the most prominent nonhematologic toxicities were mild diarrhea and fatigue. Pharmacokinetic studies failed to demonstrate any sequence-dependent interaction be-tween these agents on the metabolism of irinotecan or its major metabolite. This regimen has been modified, with chemotherapy given on day 1 and day 8 every 3 weeks, and is being tested further in previously un-treated advanced non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In a second trial, irinotecan was combined with docetaxel on a weekly schedule. When chemotherapy was given weekly for 4 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest, the recommended doses of docetaxel and irinotecan were 35 mg/m2 and 50 mg/m2, respectively. Low-grade gastrointestinal toxicity and asthenia were the dose-limiting toxicities. The treatment schedule was modified, with chemotherapy given on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle, and patients are currently being treated with docetaxel 35 mg/m2 and irinotecan 65 mg/m2. Among the 10 evaluable patients with NSCLC in this second study, there was one partial response lasting 24 weeks and four patients with stable disease, including one patient who had progressive disease on a prior paclitaxel-containing regimen. The combinations of irinotecan and a taxane on a weekly schedule are active and well tolerated and deserve further evaluation in the treatment of NSCLC.

Phase I study of cisplatin, irinotecan, and epirubicin administered every 3 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumours

This phase I study was conducted to determine the recommended phase II doses, safety profile, and antitumour activity of a combination regimen of cisplatin, irinotecan, and epirubicin administered every 3 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumours. Cisplatin and epirubicin were given at fixed doses of 50 and 60 mg m(-2), respectively. The irinotecan dose was escalated at 10 mg m(-2) increments from a starting dose level of 70 mg m(-2). Epirubicin, irinotecan, and their metabolites were measured with HPLC methods. In all, 35 patients received 141 courses of treatment. Irinotecan dose was escalated in seven cohorts up to 130 mg m(-2), and then finally de-escalated to 110 mg m(-2). The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenic fever. Nonhaematologic toxicities included mild to moderate nausea/vomiting, diarrhoea and fatigue. Of 34 patients with evaluable disease, one patient had a complete response and nine patients had partial response, yielding an overall response rate of 29.4%. Pharmacokinetic parameters of epirubicin were not affected by the sequence of drug administration. However, the AUCs of irinotecan and its metabolites were increased significantly when irinotecan and epirubicin were administered concurrently. This combination regimen has promising broad antitumour activity, and will be further evaluated in phase II studies in multiple tumour types.

Phase II trial of irinotecan plus docetaxel in cisplatin-pretreated relapsed or refractory oesophageal cancer

This phase II trial assessed the toxicity and efficacy of irinotecan plus docetaxel in cisplatin-pretreated oesophageal cancer. Irinotecan 160 mg m(-2) plus docetaxel 65 mg m(-2) once every 3 weeks led to severe myelosuppression in four patients, all of whom experienced neutropenic fever. After amendment of this regimen, 24 patients (male/female=18/6; median age=58.5 years; ECOG performance status 0/1/2=9/11/4) with advanced oesophageal cancer (adenocarcinoma/epidermoid carcinoma=13/11) received irinotecan 55 mg m(-2) plus docetaxel 25 mg m(-2) on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Serious adverse events occurred in five patients, one with lethal outcome (pneumonia). Haematological toxicity >or=3 degrees was rare, whereas nonhaematological toxicity >or=3 degrees was noted in nine out of 24 patients (asthenia in five patients, diarrhoea in three patients, nausea/emesis in two patients, constipation in one patient). Median survival time was 26 (range 2-70) weeks. Response rate, assessed according to the WHO criteria, was 12.5% (95% CI 2.7-32.4%); rate of disease stabilisation (partial remission and stable disease) was 33.3% (95% CI 15.6-55.3%) with a median duration of 18.5 (range 16-51) weeks. Although the nonhaematological toxicity proved to be considerable, weekly irinotecan plus docetaxel is feasible and shows some activity in extensively pretreated patients with oesophageal cancer.

Combination chemotherapy with docetaxel and irinotecan in metastatic malignant melanoma

AIM

The aim of the current trial was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of 3-weekly intravenous docetaxel and irinotecan in the treatment of patients with metastatic malignant melanoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixteen patients with no history of previous cytotoxic agents or immunological treatment for advanced disease were treated with docetaxel 50 mg/m2 and irinotecan 150 mg/m2 intravenously over 60 min every 21 days. Prior immunotherapy with interferon and chemotherapy for adjuvant therapies were accepted provided there was a minimum 4-week treatment-free interval. Response evaluation was performed after two cycles.

RESULTS

None of the patients had chemotherapy-induced tumour response. Eight patients achieved stable disease and others had progression of disease. The median survival time was 136 days (95% CI: 30.2-241.8), and the 3-month survival rate was 62.5%. Patients with stable disease (n = 8) had a longer survival than non-responders (P = 0.023, Breslow test). Generally side effects were mild and tolerable. Grade III-IV haematological toxicity occurred in approximately 10%. Severe emesis, stomatitis and diarrhoea was seen in less than 20% of the patients. Alopecia was observed in all patients.

CONCLUSION

A 3-weekly intravenous docetaxel and irinotecan combination appears to be inactive in the treatment of patients with malignant melanoma and has not been recommended.

Phase I study of weekly CPT-11 (irinotecan)/docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors

Based on the synergistic cytotoxicity demonstrated in vitro by topoisomerase I inhibitors followed by docetaxel and the feasibility of giving both drugs on a weekly schedule avoiding overlapping toxicities, we designed a phase I trial of weekly CPT-11 (irinotecan)/docetaxel to determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of this combination. Eighteen patients with advanced solid tumors treated with at least one prior chemotherapy regimen were included in this trial. CPT-11 was administered as a 90-min (intravenous) IV infusion followed immediately by docetaxel as a 30-min IV infusion. Both drugs were given on days 1, 8 and 15 in 4-week cycles. Four escalating dose levels of CPT-11/docetaxel (level I: 60/20 mg/m(2), level II: 60/25 mg/m(2), level III: 70/25 mg/m(2), and level IV: 70/30 mg/m(2)) were studied. Forty-seven cycles were administered (range, 1-5 courses) with a median number of 2.6 cycles per patient. Grade 4 leukopenia was the DLT reached at dose-level IV (CPT-11/docetaxel 70/30 mg/m(2)). Four patients had grade 3 anemia at dose levels III (two patients) and IV (two patients), while grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was not seen. Grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities included grade 3 diarrhea in two patients (dose levels II and IV), grade 3 asthenia in one patient (dose level II) and grade 3 stomatitis in one patient (dose level I). The recommended dose of this weekly schedule is CPT-11 70 mg/m(2) and docetaxel 25 mg/m(2). DLT of this regimen is leukopenia, although toxicity is manageable at the recommended dose level. The activity of this regimen is being evaluated in a phase II study in previously treated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Weekly chemotherapy with carboplatin, docetaxel and irinotecan in advanced non-small-cell-lung cancer: a phase II study

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of carboplatin, docetaxel plus irinotecan given weekly to patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). 50 patients with previously untreated NSCLC (stage IIIB 10; stage IV 40; 44% squamous cell carcinoma; median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status 1) received intravenous (i.v.) carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 2, docetaxel 20 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 60 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15, repeated every 5 weeks. Prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 150 ug/m(2) was given from days 3 to 6 and 10 to 13. Response was evaluated every two cycles. Four complete responses (8%) and 24 (48%) partial responses were observed, giving an overall intent-to-treat response rate of 56%. 8 patients (16%) achieved stable disease and 14 (28%) progressed. The median time to progression (TTP) was 9.6 months (range 2.5-21.8 months), median survival was 14.8 months (range 0.3-27+ months) and actuarial 1-year survival time was 55%. Grade 3/4 anaemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 18 and 22% of patients, respectively; 13 patients (26%) developed grade 3/4 neutropenia and 7 (14%) had neutropenic fever that required hospitalisation, but was successfully treated with antibiotics and G-CSF support. One patient developed a severe allergy during docetaxel administration and was withdrawn. Other grade 3/4 adverse events included diarrhoea (n=14; 3 required hospitalisation), nausea/vomiting (n=9), neurotoxicity (n=5) and fatigue (n=5). 6 patients required a dose reduction. This combination of i.v. carboplatin AUC 2, docetaxel 20 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 60 mg/m(2) given weekly is highly effective in the treatment of chemotherapy-naïve advanced NSCLC. Toxicity was moderate, but manageable.

The Role of Docetaxel in Nonplatinum-Based Combination Chemotherapy for non—small-Cell Lung Cancer

A number of newer chemotherapeutic agents including docetaxel, gemcitabine, irinotecan, and vinorelbine have demonstrated substantial activity in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Their palliative role as single agents and in combination with platinum has been well defined in NSCLC. More recently, combining these agents without platinum has been the primary objective of numerous worldwide clinical trials. Two of these docetaxel/nonplatinum-based combinations have demonstrated comparable activity to platinum-based regimens in randomized trials. While platinum-based chemotherapy remains an important therapy for treatment of NSCLC, nonplatinum combinations may be a reasonable alternative for patients. These docetaxel/nonplatinum combinations warrant further evaluation in randomized trials to define their optimal role as standard therapy for NSCLC.

The Potential for an Interaction between MRP2 (ABCC2) and Various Therapeutic Agents: Probenecid as a Candidate Inhibitor of the Biliary Excretion of Irinotecan Metabolites

Irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) is an anticancer agent with unpredictable bouts of diarrhea as a dose-limiting toxic side-effect. Since the biliary excretion of its active metabolite (SN-38) and SN-38 glucuronide (SN38-Glu), which are mediated by the multidrug resistance associated protein-2 (MRP2/ABCC2), has been proposed to be related to this gastrointestinal toxicity, we have attempted here to examine the potential of various therapeutic agents to interact with the biliary excretion in order to identify MRP2 inhibitors to prevent this toxicity. The inhibition constants (K(i)) of 26 compounds were examined for the transport of a typical MRP2 substrate in isolated canalicular membrane vesicles. Of these, 13 compounds inhibited the transport with K(i) values from 0.0461 to 281 microM. Three inhibitors (probenecid, sulfobromophthalein and glycyrrhizin) were also found to inhibit the biliary excretion of SN-38 and SN38-Glu in rats in vivo, and the degrees of inhibition were compatible with the estimated values based on the ratios of K(i) and unbound concentrations in circulating plasma. A similar estimation of the potential inhibitory effect in human was also examined by considering both the K(i) of each therapeutic agent and its unbound concentration both in circulating plasma and the inlet to the liver. The predicted degrees of inhibition by most compounds were minimal whereas approximately 75% inhibition was predicted for probenecid. Thus, probenecid may be a candidate which can be used clinically to inhibit the biliary excretion of CPT-11 metabolites, whereas an interaction between most of the other compounds and MRP2 is more unlikely.

The relevance of drug sequence in combination chemotherapy

The concept of combining chemotherapeutic agents to increase the cytotoxic efficacy has evolved greatly over the past several years. In the past, the rationale for combination chemotherapy centered on attacking different biochemical targets, overcoming drug resistance in heterogenous tumors, and increasing the dose-density of combination chemotherapy to take advantage of tumor growth kinetics. The overall goal was to improve clinical efficacy with acceptable clinical toxicity. It is now apparent that the sequence of drug administration can significantly enhance the therapeutic effect of chemotherapy. These sequence-dependent effects can be explained by chemotherapy-induced cell cycle perturbations, or by pharmacodynamic interactions between the agents in combination. In this review, we focus on drug combinations with taxanes and camptothecins, which we believe best illustrate the importance of the cell cycle and pharmacologic interactions in the sequential administration of chemotherapy. As our understanding of the cell cycle grows, our ability to appropriately sequence chemotherapy can have a great impact on the treatment of human cancers. Copyright 2000 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.