1
|
Torka P, Przespolewski E, Evens AM. Treatment Strategies for Advanced Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma in the Times of Dacarbazine Shortage. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:491-497. [PMID: 35254922 DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The shortage of dacarbazine (DTIC) has created an acute and unprecedented crisis in the management of patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma, with DTIC being an essential component of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and DTIC (ABVD) and prior attempts at omitting DTIC from ABVD leading to substantial loss of efficacy. In this review, we discuss the strategies to manage classical Hodgkin lymphoma during the DTIC shortage and propose a treatment algorithm on the basis of fitness and ability to receive anthracyclines safely.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pallawi Torka
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | | | - Andrew M Evens
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Karpurmath SV, Rathnam K, Seshachalam A, Srinivasan A, Scott J, G. RS, Janarthinakani M, Prasad K, Patil C, Anoop P, Reddy N, Anumula SK, Roopa SP, Golamari KR, Danthala M, Malipatil B, Rangarajan B, Udupa KS, Nandennavar M, Niraimathi K. Role of Interim PET Scan after 2 Cycles of ABVD in Pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma: Retrospective Multicenter Study from South India. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1730240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction Most Indian centers use Adriamycin/Bleomycin/Vinblastine/Dacarba-zine (ABVD) chemotherapy for pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma (pHL). To reduce the late toxicity, robust predictive markers are needed to risk stratify pHL patients, thereby limiting the number of chemotherapy cycles and omitting radiation for low-risk and intensifying treatment for high-risk children.
Objective This study was conducted to analyze the outcome of pHL patients treated with ABVD and various factors predicting the outcome.
Materials and Methods This retrospective study analyzed the outcome of 113 consecutive pHL children treated with ABVD chemotherapy from 11 tertiary care centers in South India from 2009 to 2019.
Results The median duration of follow-up was 2.73 years. The median age was 13 years. B symptoms are seen in 50.5% patients, bulky disease in 23%, and stage IV in 28.3%. Of 113 pHL, 69% had a positron emission tomography (PET) and 31% had computed tomography (CT)-based staging. Stage IV (37.1%) and extranodal involvement (31.2%) were seen more often with PET than with CT staging (8.5 and 2.8%, respectively). Among 64 patients with interim PET scan after two cycles (iPET2), 20.3% did not achieve complete remission (CR) and no factors were significantly associated. The 4-year event-free survival (EFS) rate of the entire cohort was 86%. The 4-year EFS rate was 93% for patients with CR in iPET2 and 52% for patients not achieving CR. The only independent predictor of low EFS was iPET2 response (p < 0.05).
Conclusion Our study confirms the prognostic role of PET scan staging and response assessment. Not achieving CR on the iPET2 scan indicates poor prognosis and warrants clinical trial enrollment for a better outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Arathi Srinivasan
- Kanchi Kamakoti CHILDS Trust Hospital, Nungambakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Julius Scott
- Sri Ramachandra Medical Center, Porur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Raman S. G.
- Madras Cancer Care Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | | | - Krishna Prasad
- Mangalore Institute of Oncology, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Manjunath Nandennavar
- Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang S, Jia M, Han J, Zhang R, Huang K, Li P, Li Q, Qiao Y, Song Q, Fu Z. Radiotherapy for patients with stage IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma: a propensity-matched analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database. Cancer Biol Ther 2020; 21:832-840. [PMID: 32835569 DOI: 10.1080/15384047.2020.1796194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The survival advantage of radiotherapy for patients with stage IV classic Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) has not been adequately evaluated. Methods We analyzed patients with stage IV HL enrolled from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry from January 2000 to December 2012. Propensity score (PS) analysis with 1:2 matching was performed to ensure well-balanced characteristics of the comparison groups. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazardous model were used to evaluate the overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), the hazards ratio (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Results Overall, for all patients with stage IV HL, receiving radiotherapy was associated with both significantly improved OS and CSS. Radiotherapy to any lesions could independently improve the OS and CSS by 30% to 36% in the multivariate analyses before and after PS matching (PSM), with the best improvement of 33% to 40% observed for patients with nodular sclerosis (P < 0.05) among all HL pathological types. In particular, radiotherapy, most likely to the residual site, was more pronouncedly associated with the improvement in survival for patients with stage IV HL who were young (age<45, P < .05) or without B symptoms (PInteraction for OS = 0.099, PInteraction for CSS = 0.255). For those patients without B symptoms, after PSM, the OS was improved by 65% (P = .021). Conclusions The large SEER results support that radiotherapy is associated with better survival of patients with stage IV HL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shijie Wang
- Cancer Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University , Wuhan, China
| | - Mingfang Jia
- Department of Health Management, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University , Wuhan, China
| | - Jianglong Han
- Cancer Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University , Wuhan, China
| | - Rui Zhang
- Cancer Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University , Wuhan, China
| | - Kejie Huang
- Cancer Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University , Wuhan, China
| | - Ping Li
- Cancer Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University , Wuhan, China
| | - Qin Li
- Cancer Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University , Wuhan, China
| | - Yunfeng Qiao
- Cancer Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University , Wuhan, China
| | - Qibin Song
- Cancer Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University , Wuhan, China
| | - Zhenming Fu
- Cancer Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University , Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dalal M, Gupta J, Price K, Zomas A, Miao H, Ashaye A. Efficacy and safety of front-line treatments for advanced Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic literature review. Expert Rev Hematol 2020; 13:907-922. [PMID: 32749937 DOI: 10.1080/17474086.2020.1793666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess evidence on the safety and efficacy of ABVD (doxorubicin [Adriamycin®], bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine), BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone), and A+AVD (brentuximab vedotin, with doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) for advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). METHODS A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted on 29 July 2016 (updated 26 July 2018) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs assessing the treatment of newly-diagnosed advanced-stage HL with ABVD and BEACOPP (and their variants), and A+AVD. RESULTS The SLR identified 62 RCTs and 42 non-RCTs. Five-year overall survival rates for ABVD and BEACOPP were 60-97% and 84-99%, and 5-year progression-free survival rates were 58-81% and 83-96%, respectively. Both regimens were associated with tolerability issues and side effects. Discontinuation or dose reduction of bleomycin resulted in fewer adverse events, without significantly affecting efficacy. A head-to-head trial demonstrated improved efficacy for A+AVD vs ABVD, with an acceptable tolerability profile. No data from head-to-head trials comparing A+AVD with BEACOPP were available, and an indirect treatment comparison was not feasible. CONCLUSION New therapies, such as A+AVD, maintain the efficacy observed with current treatments, and may provide a more tolerable treatment option for patients with advanced-stage HL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehul Dalal
- Global Evidence & Outcomes - Oncology, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited , Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Jatin Gupta
- Global Access, Decision Resources Group , Gurugram, Haryana, 122002, India
| | - Kim Price
- Global Access, Decision Resources Group, 6 Talisman Business Centre, Bicester , Oxfordshire, USA
| | - Athanasios Zomas
- Global Medical Affairs - Oncology, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Harry Miao
- Clinical Sciences , Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Ajibade Ashaye
- Global Evidence & Outcomes - Oncology, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited , Cambridge, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Weil CR, Qian Y, Von Eyben R, Daadi SE, Corbelli KS, Rosenberg SA, Advani RH, Hoppe RT. Long-term outcomes of patients with unfavorable stage I-II classic Hodgkin lymphoma treated with Stanford V chemotherapy and limited field irradiation. Leuk Lymphoma 2020; 61:2428-2434. [PMID: 32476541 DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2020.1768385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Management of stage I-II unfavorable risk Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) strives to reduce toxicity while maintaining tumor control. Compared to ABVD or BEACOPP, Stanford V chemotherapy contains less doxorubicin and bleomycin. We report long-term outcomes of patients with stage I-II classic HL with European risk factors treated with Stanford V combined modality therapy (CMT). From our institutional cancer registry, we identified 168 patients with ≥1 European risk factor treated with 8-12 weeks of Stanford V CMT and consolidative radiotherapy between 1990 and 2016. Outcomes were analyzed after classification by EORTC and GHSG unfavorable criteria. With median follow-up of 8.4 years, 10-year overall survival and progression-free survival for the entire cohort were 95% and 88%, respectively. Thirteen of 18 relapses were salvaged successfully. There were no cases of MDS or AML after primary therapy. Long-term outcomes of stage I-II unfavorable risk HL treated with Stanford V CMT are comparable to ABVD or BEACOPP regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher R Weil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Yushen Qian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Rie Von Eyben
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Sarah E Daadi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Karen S Corbelli
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Saul A Rosenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.,Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Ranjana H Advani
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Richard T Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Moding EJ, Advani R, Rosenberg SA, Hoppe RT. Prognostic factors and patterns of failure in advanced stage Hodgkin lymphoma treated with combined modality therapy. Radiother Oncol 2018; 129:507-512. [PMID: 30539763 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.06.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2018] [Revised: 06/20/2018] [Accepted: 06/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The role of irradiation to non-bulky and bulky sites of disease in advanced stage Hodgkin lymphoma is controversial. We aimed to review the long-term outcomes of patients treated with combined modality therapy to clarify the role of consolidative radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with stage III or IV Hodgkin lymphoma treated with Stanford V chemotherapy and consolidative radiotherapy to initial sites of disease ≥5 cm were analyzed retrospectively to determine patient outcomes, patterns of failure, and factors associated with treatment failure. RESULTS A total of 170 patients were analyzed. Overall survival was 91.2%, freedom from progression was 80.6%, and progression-free survival was 78.9% at 10 years. 5 patients (2.9%) had refractory disease and 27 patients (15.9%) relapsed after treatment. Only an International Prognostic Score (IPS) greater than 2 predicted disease progression. 19 out of 27 relapses occurred exclusively outside of the radiation treatment field, and 17 out of 27 relapses occurred exclusively at original sites of disease. However, only 11 of 170 patients (6.5%) relapsed exclusively at original, non-bulky sites of disease not treated with radiation therapy. The cumulative incidence of local failure at 10 years was 4.6% for unirradiated sites and 2.6% for irradiated sites. CONCLUSION Patients with advanced stage Hodgkin lymphoma treated with combined modality therapy including consolidative radiotherapy to bulky disease sites had excellent long-term outcomes. Given the low frequency of isolated failures at initial sites, our results suggest that selective radiation therapy to sites at high risk of relapse may be feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Everett J Moding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA
| | - Ranjana Advani
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA
| | - Saul A Rosenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA; Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA
| | - Richard T Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ansell SM. Hodgkin lymphoma: 2018 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am J Hematol 2018; 93:704-715. [PMID: 29634090 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.25071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2018] [Accepted: 02/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
DISEASE OVERVIEW Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is an uncommon B-cell lymphoid malignancy affecting 8500 new patients annually and representing approximately 10.2% of all lymphomas in the United States. DIAGNOSIS HL is composed of two distinct disease entities: classical HL and nodular lymphocyte predominant HL. Nodular sclerosis, mixed cellularity, lymphocyte depletion, and lymphocyte-rich HL are subgroups of classical HL. RISK STRATIFICATION An accurate assessment of the stage of disease in patients with HL is critical for the selection of the appropriate therapy. Prognostic models that identify patients at low or high risk for recurrence, as well as the response to therapy as determined by positron emission tomography scan, are used to optimize therapy. RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY Initial therapy for HL patients is based on the histology of the disease, the anatomical stage and the presence of poor prognostic features. Patients with early stage disease are typically treated with combined modality strategies utilizing abbreviated courses of combination chemotherapy followed by involved-field radiation therapy, while those with advanced stage disease receive a longer course of chemotherapy often without radiation therapy. Newer agents including brentuximab vedotin are now being incorporated into frontline therapy and these new combinations are becoming a standard of care. MANAGEMENT OF RELAPSED/REFRACTORY DISEASE High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by an autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is the standard of care for most patients who relapse following initial therapy. For patients who fail HDCT with ASCT, brentuximab vedotin, PD-1 blockade, nonmyeloablative allogeneic transplant or participation in a clinical trial should be considered.
Collapse
|
8
|
Roubaud G, Liaw BC, Oh WK, Mulholland DJ. Strategies to avoid treatment-induced lineage crisis in advanced prostate cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2017; 14:269-283. [PMID: 27874061 PMCID: PMC5567685 DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The increasing potency of therapies that target the androgen receptor (AR) signalling axis has correlated with a rise in the proportion of patients with prostate cancer harbouring an adaptive phenotype, termed treatment-induced lineage crisis. This phenotype is characterized by features that include soft-tissue metastasis and/or resistance to standard anticancer therapies. Potent anticancer treatments might force cancer cells to evolve and develop alternative cell lineages that are resistant to primary therapies, a mechanism similar to the generation of multidrug- resistant microorganisms after continued antibiotic use. Herein, we assess the hypothesis that treatment-adapted phenotypes harbour reduced AR expression and/or activity, and acquire compensatory strategies for cell survival. We highlight the striking similarities between castration-resistant prostate cancer and triple-negative breast cancer, another poorly differentiated endocrine malignancy. Alternative treatment paradigms are needed to avoid therapy-induced resistance. Herein, we present a new clinical trial strategy designed to evaluate the potential of rapid drug cycling as an approach to delay the onset of resistance and treatment-induced lineage crisis in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guilhem Roubaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, 229 Cours de l'Argonne, Bordeaux 33076, France
| | - Bobby C Liaw
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Tisch Cancer Institute, 1470 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10029, USA
| | - William K Oh
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Tisch Cancer Institute, 1470 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10029, USA
| | - David J Mulholland
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Tisch Cancer Institute, 1470 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10029, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ansell SM. Hodgkin lymphoma: 2016 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am J Hematol 2016; 91:434-42. [PMID: 27001163 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.24272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2015] [Accepted: 12/03/2015] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
DISEASE OVERVIEW Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is an uncommon B-cell lymphoid malignancy affecting 9,050 new patients annually and representing approximately 11.2% of all lymphomas in the United States. DIAGNOSIS HL is composed of two distinct disease entities; the more commonly diagnosed classical HL and the rare nodular lymphocyte predominant HL. Nodular sclerosis, mixed cellularity, lymphocyte depletion, and lymphocyte-rich HL are subgroups under the designation of classical HL. RISK STRATIFICATION An accurate assessment of the stage of disease in patients with HL is critical for the selection of the appropriate therapy. Prognostic models that identify patients at low or high risk for recurrence, as well as the response to therapy as determined by positron emission tomography (PET) scan, are used to optimize therapy. RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY Initial therapy for HL patients is based on the histology of the disease, the anatomical stage and the presence of poor prognostic features. Patients with early stage disease are typically treated with combined modality strategies utilizing abbreviated courses of combination chemotherapy followed by involved-field radiation therapy, while those with advanced stage disease receive a longer course of chemotherapy often without radiation therapy. Management of relapsed/refractory disease: High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by an autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is the standard of care for most patients who relapse following initial therapy. For patients who fail HDCT with ASCT, brentuximab vedotin, PD-1 blockade, nonmyeloablative allogeneic transplant or participation in a clinical trial should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen M. Ansell
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Trends in Use of Radiation Therapy for Hodgkin Lymphoma From 2000 to 2012 on the Basis of the National Cancer Data Base. CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA 2016; 16:12-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2015.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2015] [Accepted: 11/12/2015] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
11
|
Ansell SM. Hodgkin Lymphoma: Diagnosis and Treatment. Mayo Clin Proc 2015; 90:1574-83. [PMID: 26541251 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2015] [Revised: 07/06/2015] [Accepted: 07/16/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Hodgkin lymphoma is a rare B-cell malignant neoplasm affecting approximately 9000 new patients annually. This disease represents approximately 11% of all lymphomas seen in the United States and comprises 2 discrete disease entities--classical Hodgkin lymphoma and nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma. Within the subcategorization of classical Hodgkin lymphoma are defined subgroups: nodular sclerosis, mixed cellularity, lymphocyte depletion, and lymphocyte-rich Hodgkin lymphoma. Staging of this disease is essential for the choice of optimal therapy. Prognostic models to identify patients at high or low risk for recurrence have been developed, and these models, along with positron emission tomography, are used to provide optimal therapy. The initial treatment for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma is based on the histologic characteristics of the disease, the stage at presentation, and the presence or absence of prognostic factors associated with poor outcome. Patients with early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma commonly receive combined-modality therapies that include abbreviated courses of chemotherapy followed by involved-field radiation treatment. In contrast, patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma commonly receive a more prolonged course of combination chemotherapy, with radiation therapy used only in selected cases. For patients with relapse or refractory disease, salvage chemotherapy followed by high-dose treatment and an autologous stem cell transplant is the standard of care. For patients who are ineligible for this therapy or those in whom high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplant have failed, treatment with brentuximab vedotin is a standard approach. Additional options include palliative chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplant, or participation in a clinical trial testing novel agents.
Collapse
|
12
|
Advani RH, Hong F, Fisher RI, Bartlett NL, Robinson KS, Gascoyne RD, Wagner H, Stiff PJ, Cheson BD, Stewart DA, Gordon LI, Kahl BS, Friedberg JW, Blum KA, Habermann TM, Tuscano JM, Hoppe RT, Horning SJ. Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing ABVD Plus Radiotherapy With the Stanford V Regimen in Patients With Stages I or II Locally Extensive, Bulky Mediastinal Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Subset Analysis of the North American Intergroup E2496 Trial. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33:1936-42. [PMID: 25897153 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.57.8138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The phase III North American Intergroup E2496 Trial (Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Hodgkin's Lymphoma) compared doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) with mechlorethamine, doxorubicin, vincristine, bleomycin, vinblastine, etoposide, and prednisone (Stanford V). We report results of a planned subgroup analysis in patients with stage I or II bulky mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomly assigned to six to eight cycles of ABVD every 28 days or Stanford V once per week for 12 weeks. Two to 3 weeks after completion of chemotherapy, all patients received 36 Gy of modified involved field radiotherapy (IFRT) to the mediastinum, hila, and supraclavicular regions. Patients on the Stanford V arm received IFRT to additional sites ≥ 5 cm at diagnosis. Primary end points were failure-free survival (FFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Of 794 eligible patients, 264 had stage I or II bulky disease, 135 received ABVD, and 129 received Stanford V. Patient characteristics were matched. The overall response rate was 83% with ABVD and 88% with Stanford V. At a median follow-up of 6.5 years, the study excluded a difference of more than 21% in 5-year FFS and more than 16% in 5-year OS between ABVD and Stanford V (5-year FFS: 85% v 79%; HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.37 to 1.25; P = .22; 5-year OS: 96% v 92%; HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.16 to 1.47; P = .19). In-field relapses occurred in < 10% of the patients in each arm. CONCLUSION For patients with stage I or II bulky mediastinal HL, no substantial statistically significant differences were detected between the two regimens, although power was limited. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first prospective trial reporting outcomes specific to this subgroup, and it sets a benchmark for comparison of ongoing and future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ranjana H Advani
- Ranjana H. Advani, Richard T. Hoppe, and Sandra J. Horning, Stanford University, Stanford; Joseph M. Tuscano, University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Fangxin Hong, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard I. Fisher and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY; Nancy L. Bartlett, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; K. Sue Robinson, Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Center, Halifax, Nova Scotia; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia; Douglas A. Stewart, Tim Baker Cancer Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Henry Wagner Jr, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; Patrick J. Stiff, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood; Leo I. Gordon, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; Brad S. Kahl, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Kristie A. Blum, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; and Thomas M. Habermann, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| | - Fangxin Hong
- Ranjana H. Advani, Richard T. Hoppe, and Sandra J. Horning, Stanford University, Stanford; Joseph M. Tuscano, University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Fangxin Hong, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard I. Fisher and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY; Nancy L. Bartlett, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; K. Sue Robinson, Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Center, Halifax, Nova Scotia; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia; Douglas A. Stewart, Tim Baker Cancer Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Henry Wagner Jr, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; Patrick J. Stiff, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood; Leo I. Gordon, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; Brad S. Kahl, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Kristie A. Blum, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; and Thomas M. Habermann, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Richard I Fisher
- Ranjana H. Advani, Richard T. Hoppe, and Sandra J. Horning, Stanford University, Stanford; Joseph M. Tuscano, University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Fangxin Hong, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard I. Fisher and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY; Nancy L. Bartlett, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; K. Sue Robinson, Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Center, Halifax, Nova Scotia; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia; Douglas A. Stewart, Tim Baker Cancer Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Henry Wagner Jr, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; Patrick J. Stiff, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood; Leo I. Gordon, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; Brad S. Kahl, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Kristie A. Blum, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; and Thomas M. Habermann, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Nancy L Bartlett
- Ranjana H. Advani, Richard T. Hoppe, and Sandra J. Horning, Stanford University, Stanford; Joseph M. Tuscano, University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Fangxin Hong, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard I. Fisher and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY; Nancy L. Bartlett, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; K. Sue Robinson, Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Center, Halifax, Nova Scotia; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia; Douglas A. Stewart, Tim Baker Cancer Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Henry Wagner Jr, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; Patrick J. Stiff, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood; Leo I. Gordon, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; Brad S. Kahl, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Kristie A. Blum, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; and Thomas M. Habermann, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - K Sue Robinson
- Ranjana H. Advani, Richard T. Hoppe, and Sandra J. Horning, Stanford University, Stanford; Joseph M. Tuscano, University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Fangxin Hong, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard I. Fisher and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY; Nancy L. Bartlett, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; K. Sue Robinson, Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Center, Halifax, Nova Scotia; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia; Douglas A. Stewart, Tim Baker Cancer Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Henry Wagner Jr, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; Patrick J. Stiff, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood; Leo I. Gordon, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; Brad S. Kahl, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Kristie A. Blum, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; and Thomas M. Habermann, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Randy D Gascoyne
- Ranjana H. Advani, Richard T. Hoppe, and Sandra J. Horning, Stanford University, Stanford; Joseph M. Tuscano, University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Fangxin Hong, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard I. Fisher and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY; Nancy L. Bartlett, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; K. Sue Robinson, Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Center, Halifax, Nova Scotia; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia; Douglas A. Stewart, Tim Baker Cancer Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Henry Wagner Jr, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; Patrick J. Stiff, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood; Leo I. Gordon, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; Brad S. Kahl, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Kristie A. Blum, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; and Thomas M. Habermann, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Henry Wagner
- Ranjana H. Advani, Richard T. Hoppe, and Sandra J. Horning, Stanford University, Stanford; Joseph M. Tuscano, University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Fangxin Hong, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard I. Fisher and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY; Nancy L. Bartlett, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; K. Sue Robinson, Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Center, Halifax, Nova Scotia; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia; Douglas A. Stewart, Tim Baker Cancer Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Henry Wagner Jr, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; Patrick J. Stiff, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood; Leo I. Gordon, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; Brad S. Kahl, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Kristie A. Blum, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; and Thomas M. Habermann, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Patrick J Stiff
- Ranjana H. Advani, Richard T. Hoppe, and Sandra J. Horning, Stanford University, Stanford; Joseph M. Tuscano, University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Fangxin Hong, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard I. Fisher and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY; Nancy L. Bartlett, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; K. Sue Robinson, Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Center, Halifax, Nova Scotia; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia; Douglas A. Stewart, Tim Baker Cancer Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Henry Wagner Jr, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; Patrick J. Stiff, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood; Leo I. Gordon, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; Brad S. Kahl, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Kristie A. Blum, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; and Thomas M. Habermann, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Bruce D Cheson
- Ranjana H. Advani, Richard T. Hoppe, and Sandra J. Horning, Stanford University, Stanford; Joseph M. Tuscano, University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Fangxin Hong, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard I. Fisher and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY; Nancy L. Bartlett, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; K. Sue Robinson, Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Center, Halifax, Nova Scotia; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia; Douglas A. Stewart, Tim Baker Cancer Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Henry Wagner Jr, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; Patrick J. Stiff, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood; Leo I. Gordon, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; Brad S. Kahl, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Kristie A. Blum, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; and Thomas M. Habermann, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Douglas A Stewart
- Ranjana H. Advani, Richard T. Hoppe, and Sandra J. Horning, Stanford University, Stanford; Joseph M. Tuscano, University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Fangxin Hong, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard I. Fisher and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY; Nancy L. Bartlett, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; K. Sue Robinson, Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Center, Halifax, Nova Scotia; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia; Douglas A. Stewart, Tim Baker Cancer Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Henry Wagner Jr, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; Patrick J. Stiff, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood; Leo I. Gordon, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; Brad S. Kahl, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Kristie A. Blum, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; and Thomas M. Habermann, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Leo I Gordon
- Ranjana H. Advani, Richard T. Hoppe, and Sandra J. Horning, Stanford University, Stanford; Joseph M. Tuscano, University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Fangxin Hong, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard I. Fisher and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY; Nancy L. Bartlett, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; K. Sue Robinson, Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Center, Halifax, Nova Scotia; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia; Douglas A. Stewart, Tim Baker Cancer Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Henry Wagner Jr, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; Patrick J. Stiff, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood; Leo I. Gordon, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; Brad S. Kahl, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Kristie A. Blum, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; and Thomas M. Habermann, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Brad S Kahl
- Ranjana H. Advani, Richard T. Hoppe, and Sandra J. Horning, Stanford University, Stanford; Joseph M. Tuscano, University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Fangxin Hong, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard I. Fisher and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY; Nancy L. Bartlett, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; K. Sue Robinson, Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Center, Halifax, Nova Scotia; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia; Douglas A. Stewart, Tim Baker Cancer Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Henry Wagner Jr, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; Patrick J. Stiff, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood; Leo I. Gordon, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; Brad S. Kahl, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Kristie A. Blum, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; and Thomas M. Habermann, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Jonathan W Friedberg
- Ranjana H. Advani, Richard T. Hoppe, and Sandra J. Horning, Stanford University, Stanford; Joseph M. Tuscano, University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Fangxin Hong, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard I. Fisher and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY; Nancy L. Bartlett, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; K. Sue Robinson, Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Center, Halifax, Nova Scotia; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia; Douglas A. Stewart, Tim Baker Cancer Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Henry Wagner Jr, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; Patrick J. Stiff, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood; Leo I. Gordon, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; Brad S. Kahl, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Kristie A. Blum, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; and Thomas M. Habermann, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Kristie A Blum
- Ranjana H. Advani, Richard T. Hoppe, and Sandra J. Horning, Stanford University, Stanford; Joseph M. Tuscano, University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Fangxin Hong, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard I. Fisher and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY; Nancy L. Bartlett, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; K. Sue Robinson, Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Center, Halifax, Nova Scotia; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia; Douglas A. Stewart, Tim Baker Cancer Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Henry Wagner Jr, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; Patrick J. Stiff, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood; Leo I. Gordon, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; Brad S. Kahl, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Kristie A. Blum, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; and Thomas M. Habermann, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Thomas M Habermann
- Ranjana H. Advani, Richard T. Hoppe, and Sandra J. Horning, Stanford University, Stanford; Joseph M. Tuscano, University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Fangxin Hong, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard I. Fisher and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY; Nancy L. Bartlett, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; K. Sue Robinson, Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Center, Halifax, Nova Scotia; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia; Douglas A. Stewart, Tim Baker Cancer Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Henry Wagner Jr, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; Patrick J. Stiff, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood; Leo I. Gordon, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; Brad S. Kahl, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Kristie A. Blum, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; and Thomas M. Habermann, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Joseph M Tuscano
- Ranjana H. Advani, Richard T. Hoppe, and Sandra J. Horning, Stanford University, Stanford; Joseph M. Tuscano, University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Fangxin Hong, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard I. Fisher and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY; Nancy L. Bartlett, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; K. Sue Robinson, Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Center, Halifax, Nova Scotia; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia; Douglas A. Stewart, Tim Baker Cancer Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Henry Wagner Jr, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; Patrick J. Stiff, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood; Leo I. Gordon, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; Brad S. Kahl, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Kristie A. Blum, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; and Thomas M. Habermann, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Richard T Hoppe
- Ranjana H. Advani, Richard T. Hoppe, and Sandra J. Horning, Stanford University, Stanford; Joseph M. Tuscano, University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Fangxin Hong, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard I. Fisher and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY; Nancy L. Bartlett, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; K. Sue Robinson, Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Center, Halifax, Nova Scotia; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia; Douglas A. Stewart, Tim Baker Cancer Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Henry Wagner Jr, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; Patrick J. Stiff, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood; Leo I. Gordon, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; Brad S. Kahl, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Kristie A. Blum, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; and Thomas M. Habermann, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Sandra J Horning
- Ranjana H. Advani, Richard T. Hoppe, and Sandra J. Horning, Stanford University, Stanford; Joseph M. Tuscano, University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Fangxin Hong, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard I. Fisher and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY; Nancy L. Bartlett, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; K. Sue Robinson, Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Center, Halifax, Nova Scotia; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia; Douglas A. Stewart, Tim Baker Cancer Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Henry Wagner Jr, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; Patrick J. Stiff, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood; Leo I. Gordon, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Bruce D. Cheson, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; Brad S. Kahl, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Kristie A. Blum, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; and Thomas M. Habermann, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Agur A, Amir G, Paltiel O, Klein M, Dann EJ, Goldschmidt H, Goldschmidt N. CD68 staining correlates with the size of residual mass but not with survival in classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma 2014; 56:1315-9. [PMID: 25204373 DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2014.963081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
The prognostic role of CD68 tumor-associated macrophages in classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) remains controversial. We stained diagnostic biopsies and scored for CD68 using the PGM1 antibody among 98 consecutive patients with cHL from our center followed over a median of 45 months for progression-free survival (PFS). Among 79 patients we assessed interim and post-treatment positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT). Residual mass (RM) size was based on the greatest diameter of the largest mass seen in post-treatment imaging, and percent reduction was calculated by comparing RM size with its greatest pretreatment diameter. We found a significant association between CD68 positivity and absolute size of initial disease mass (p = 0.014) and residual mass at the end of therapy (p = 0.006) but no association was observed with interim PET-CT results or PFS. Our findings suggest that macrophages may influence tumor size by altering the microenvironment. This study does not support a prognostic role of CD68 positivity in predicting survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariel Agur
- Hematology Department, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center , Jerusalem , Israel
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ansell SM. Hodgkin lymphoma: 2014 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am J Hematol 2014; 89:771-9. [PMID: 24953862 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.23750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2014] [Accepted: 04/21/2014] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
DISEASE OVERVIEW Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is an uncommon B-cell lymphoid malignancy affecting 9,200 new patients annually and representing approximately 11.5% of all lymphomas in the United States. DIAGNOSIS HL is composed of two distinct disease entities; the more commonly diagnosed classical HL and the rare nodular lymphocyte-predominant HL. Nodular sclerosis, mixed cellularity, lymphocyte depletion, and lymphocyte-rich HL are subgroups under the designation of classical HL. RISK STRATIFICATION An accurate assessment of the stage of disease in patients with HL is critical for the selection of the appropriate therapy. Prognostic models that identify patients at low or high risk for recurrence, as well as the response to therapy as determined by positron emission tomography scan, are used to optimize therapy. RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY Initial therapy for HL patients is based on the histology of the disease, the anatomical stage, and the presence of poor prognostic features. Patients with early stage disease are treated with combined modality strategies using abbreviated courses of combination chemotherapy followed by involved-field radiation therapy, while those with advanced stage disease receive a longer course of chemotherapy often without radiation therapy. Management of relapsed/refractory disease: High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by an autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is the standard of care for most patients who relapse following initial therapy. For patients who fail HDCT with ASCT, brentuximab vedotin, palliative chemotherapy, nonmyeloablative allogeneic transplant, or participation in a clinical trial should be considered.
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is an uncommon B-cell lymphoid malignancy composed of two distinct disease entities; the more commonly diagnosed classical HL and the rare nodular lymphocyte predominant HL. Nodular sclerosis, mixed cellularity, lymphocyte depletion, and lymphocyte-rich HL are subgroups under the designation of classical HL. An accurate assessment of the stage of disease in patients with HL is critical for the selection of appropriate therapy. Prognostic models that identify patients at low or high risk for recurrence are used to optimize therapy for patients with limited or advanced stage disease and predict their outcomes while reducing the toxicities. Initial therapy for HL patients is based on the histology, anatomical stage and the presence of poor prognostic features. Management of localized HL has shifted from radiation alone to combined modality strategies with brief courses of combination chemotherapy followed by involved-field radiation therapy. Patients with advanced stage disease receive a longer course of chemotherapy commonly without radiation therapy. Clinical trials are being conducted using the early interim response or response at the end of therapy as measured by PET scan to determine treatment.
Collapse
|
16
|
Park K, Yoon DH, Kim S, Park CS, Huh J, Lee SW, Suh C. High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation in Korean patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma. Int J Hematol 2013; 97:256-62. [PMID: 23355263 DOI: 10.1007/s12185-013-1267-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2012] [Revised: 12/30/2012] [Accepted: 01/15/2013] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation (HDCT-ASCT) is a standard therapy for patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). However, its efficacy in Asian patients has not been well investigated. A retrospective analysis of outcomes in 10 consecutive patients who underwent ASCT for HL in a single Korean centre from August 2005 to September 2010 was conducted. The median age was 34.5 years (range 17-64 years) and seven patients were male. Six patients were of stage III-IV at presentation. B symptoms were present in six patients. International Prognostic Score (IPS) was as follows: IPS = 1 (n = 5), IPS = 2 (n = 1), IPS = 4 (n = 2), and IPS = 5 (n = 2). The analysis included nine patients with relapsed HL and one primary refractory case. Four patients were in second complete response and the others were in partial response after salvage chemotherapy. With a median follow-up duration of 58.0 months, 3-year progression-free survival rate and overall survival rate from ASCT were 40 and 76 %, respectively. The results suggest that the efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy followed by ASCT in Korean patients with refractory or relapsed HL is comparable to that in Western patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kwonoh Park
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Koontz MZ, Horning SJ, Balise R, Greenberg PL, Rosenberg SA, Hoppe RT, Advani RH. Risk of therapy-related secondary leukemia in Hodgkin lymphoma: the Stanford University experience over three generations of clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31:592-8. [PMID: 23295809 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.44.5791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome (t-AML/MDS) risk in patients treated for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) on successive generations of Stanford clinical trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with HL treated at Stanford with at least 5 years of follow-up after completing therapy were identified from our database. Records were reviewed for outcome and development of t-AML/MDS. RESULTS Seven hundred fifty-four patients treated from 1974 to 2003 were identified. Therapy varied across studies. Radiotherapy evolved from extended fields (S and C studies) to involved fields (G studies). Primary chemotherapy was mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (MOPP) or procarbazine, mechlorethamine, and vinblastine (PAVe) in S studies; MOPP, PAVe, vinblastine, bleomycin, and methotrexate (VBM), or doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) in C studies; and VbM (reduced dose of bleomycin compared with VBM) or mechlorethamine, doxorubicin, vinblastine, vincristine, bleomycin, etoposide, and prednisone (Stanford V) in G studies. Cumulative exposure to alkylating agent (AA) was notably lower in the G studies compared with the S and C studies, with a 75% to 83% lower dose of nitrogen mustard in addition to omission of procarbazine and melphalan. Twenty-four (3.2%) of 754 patients developed t-AML/MDS, 15 after primary chemotherapy and nine after salvage chemotherapy for relapsed HL. The incidence of t-AML/MDS was significantly lower in the G studies (0.3%) compared with the S (5.7%) or C (5.2%) studies (P < .001). Additionally, in the G studies, no t-AML/MDS was noted after primary therapy, and the only patient who developed t-AML/MDS did so after second-line therapy. CONCLUSION Our data demonstrate the relationship between the cumulative AA dose and t-AML/MDS. Limiting the dose of AA and decreased need for secondary treatments have significantly reduced the incidence of t-AML/MDS, which was extremely rare in the G studies (Stanford V era).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Zach Koontz
- Stanford University Medical Center, 875 Blake Wilbur Dr, CC-2338, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ansell SM. Hodgkin lymphoma: 2012 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am J Hematol 2012; 87:1096-103. [PMID: 23151980 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.23348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
DISEASE OVERVIEW Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is an uncommon B-cell lymphoid malignancy affecting 9,000 new patients annually and representing approximately 11% of all lymphomas in the United States. DIAGNOSIS HL is composed of two distinct disease entities; the more commonly diagnosed classical HL and the rare nodular lymphocyte predominant HL. Nodular sclerosis, mixed cellularity, lymphocyte depletion, and lymphocyte-rich HL are subgroups under the designation of classical HL. RISK STRATIFICATION An accurate assessment of the stage of disease in patients with HL is critical for the selection of the appropriate therapy. Prognostic models that identify patients at low or high risk for recurrence are used to optimize therapy for patients with limited or advanced stage disease. RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY Initial therapy for HL patients is based on the histology of the disease, the anatomical stage and the presence of poor prognostic features. Patients with early stage disease are treated with combined modality strategies utilizing abbreviated courses of combination chemotherapy followed by involved-field radiation therapy, while those with advanced stage disease receive a longer course of chemotherapy often without radiation therapy. MANAGEMENT OF REFRACTORY DISEASE High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by an autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is the standard of care for most patients who relapse following initial therapy. For patients who fail HDCT with ASCT, brentuximab vedotin, palliative chemotherapy, non-myeloablative allogeneic transplant or participation in a clinical trial should be considered.
Collapse
|
19
|
Gordon LI, Hong F, Fisher RI, Bartlett NL, Connors JM, Gascoyne RD, Wagner H, Stiff PJ, Cheson BD, Gospodarowicz M, Advani R, Kahl BS, Friedberg JW, Blum KA, Habermann TM, Tuscano JM, Hoppe RT, Horning SJ. Randomized phase III trial of ABVD versus Stanford V with or without radiation therapy in locally extensive and advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma: an intergroup study coordinated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (E2496). J Clin Oncol 2012. [PMID: 23182987 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.43.4803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 209] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Although ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) has been established as the standard of care in patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma, newer regimens have been investigated, which have appeared superior in early phase II studies. Our aim was to determine if failure-free survival was superior in patients treated with the Stanford V regimen compared with ABVD. PATIENTS AND METHODS The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, along with the Cancer and Leukemia Group B, the Southwest Oncology Group, and the Canadian NCIC Clinical Trials Group, conducted this randomized phase III trial in patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma. Stratification factors included extent of disease (localized v extensive) and International Prognostic Factors Project Score (0 to 2 v 3 to 7). The primary end point was failure-free survival (FFS), defined as the time from random assignment to progression, relapse, or death, whichever occurred first. Overall survival, a secondary end point, was measured from random assignment to death as a result of any cause. This design provided 87% power to detect a 33% reduction in FFS hazard rate, or a difference in 5-year FFS of 64% versus 74% at two-sided .05 significance level. RESULTS There was no significant difference in the overall response rate between the two arms, with complete remission and clinical complete remission rates of 73% for ABVD and 69% for Stanford V. At a median follow-up of 6.4 years, there was no difference in FFS: 74% for ABVD and 71% for Stanford V at 5 years (P = .32). CONCLUSION ABVD remains the standard of care for patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leo I Gordon
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Chisesi T, Bellei M, Luminari S, Montanini A, Marcheselli L, Levis A, Gobbi P, Vitolo U, Stelitano C, Pavone V, Merli F, Liberati M, Baldini L, Bordonaro R, Pesce EA, Federico M. Long-Term Follow-Up Analysis of HD9601 Trial Comparing ABVD Versus Stanford V Versus MOPP/EBV/CAD in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Advanced-Stage Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A Study From the Intergruppo Italiano Linfomi. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29:4227-33. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.30.9799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The Intergruppo Italiano Linfomi HD9601 trial compared doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) versus doxorubicin, vinblastine, mechloretamine, vincristine, bleomycin, etoposide, and prednisone (Stanford V [StV]) versus the combination of mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone (MOPP) with epidoxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine (EBV), lomustine, doxorubicin, and vindesine (CAD) (MOPP/EBV/CAD [MEC]) for the initial treatment of advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma to select which regimen would best support a reduced radiotherapy program (limited to two or fewer sites of either previous bulky or partially remitting disease). Superiority of ABVD and MEC to StV was demonstrated. We report analysis of long-term outcome and toxicity. Patients and Methods Patients with stage IIB, III, or IV were randomly assigned among six cycles of ABVD, three cycles of StV, and six cycles of MEC; radiotherapy was administered in 76, 71, and 50 patients in the three arms, respectively. Results Currently, the median follow-up is 86 months; in the prolonged observation period, eight additional failures, including two relapses, both in the StV arm, and six additional deaths in complete response were recorded. The 10-year overall survival rates were 87%, 80%, and 78% for ABVD, MEC, and StV, respectively (P = .4). The 10-year failure-free survival was 75%, 74%, and 49% in the ABVD, MEC, and StV arms, respectively (P < .001). The 10-year disease-free survival of patients treated or not with radiotherapy (RT) showed no difference for ABVD or MEC (85% v 80% and 93% v 68%), and a statistically significant difference for StV (76% v 33%; P = .004). No significant long-term toxicity was recorded. Conclusion The long-term analysis confirmed ABVD and MEC superiority to StV. The use of RT after StV was established as mandatory. ABVD is still to be considered as the standard treatment with a good balance between efficacy and toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teodoro Chisesi
- Teodoro Chisesi, Ospedale Civile S.S. Giovanni e Paolo, Venezia; Monica Bellei, Stefano Luminari, Antonella Montanini, Luigi Marcheselli, Emanuela Anna Pesce, and Massimo Federico, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena; Alessandro Levis, A.O. S.S. Antonio e Biagio, Alessandria; Paolo Gobbi, Università di Pavia, Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia; Umberto Vitolo, Azienda Ospedaliera e Universitaria San Giovanni Battista, Torino; Caterina
| | - Monica Bellei
- Teodoro Chisesi, Ospedale Civile S.S. Giovanni e Paolo, Venezia; Monica Bellei, Stefano Luminari, Antonella Montanini, Luigi Marcheselli, Emanuela Anna Pesce, and Massimo Federico, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena; Alessandro Levis, A.O. S.S. Antonio e Biagio, Alessandria; Paolo Gobbi, Università di Pavia, Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia; Umberto Vitolo, Azienda Ospedaliera e Universitaria San Giovanni Battista, Torino; Caterina
| | - Stefano Luminari
- Teodoro Chisesi, Ospedale Civile S.S. Giovanni e Paolo, Venezia; Monica Bellei, Stefano Luminari, Antonella Montanini, Luigi Marcheselli, Emanuela Anna Pesce, and Massimo Federico, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena; Alessandro Levis, A.O. S.S. Antonio e Biagio, Alessandria; Paolo Gobbi, Università di Pavia, Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia; Umberto Vitolo, Azienda Ospedaliera e Universitaria San Giovanni Battista, Torino; Caterina
| | - Antonella Montanini
- Teodoro Chisesi, Ospedale Civile S.S. Giovanni e Paolo, Venezia; Monica Bellei, Stefano Luminari, Antonella Montanini, Luigi Marcheselli, Emanuela Anna Pesce, and Massimo Federico, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena; Alessandro Levis, A.O. S.S. Antonio e Biagio, Alessandria; Paolo Gobbi, Università di Pavia, Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia; Umberto Vitolo, Azienda Ospedaliera e Universitaria San Giovanni Battista, Torino; Caterina
| | - Luigi Marcheselli
- Teodoro Chisesi, Ospedale Civile S.S. Giovanni e Paolo, Venezia; Monica Bellei, Stefano Luminari, Antonella Montanini, Luigi Marcheselli, Emanuela Anna Pesce, and Massimo Federico, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena; Alessandro Levis, A.O. S.S. Antonio e Biagio, Alessandria; Paolo Gobbi, Università di Pavia, Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia; Umberto Vitolo, Azienda Ospedaliera e Universitaria San Giovanni Battista, Torino; Caterina
| | - Alessandro Levis
- Teodoro Chisesi, Ospedale Civile S.S. Giovanni e Paolo, Venezia; Monica Bellei, Stefano Luminari, Antonella Montanini, Luigi Marcheselli, Emanuela Anna Pesce, and Massimo Federico, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena; Alessandro Levis, A.O. S.S. Antonio e Biagio, Alessandria; Paolo Gobbi, Università di Pavia, Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia; Umberto Vitolo, Azienda Ospedaliera e Universitaria San Giovanni Battista, Torino; Caterina
| | - Paolo Gobbi
- Teodoro Chisesi, Ospedale Civile S.S. Giovanni e Paolo, Venezia; Monica Bellei, Stefano Luminari, Antonella Montanini, Luigi Marcheselli, Emanuela Anna Pesce, and Massimo Federico, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena; Alessandro Levis, A.O. S.S. Antonio e Biagio, Alessandria; Paolo Gobbi, Università di Pavia, Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia; Umberto Vitolo, Azienda Ospedaliera e Universitaria San Giovanni Battista, Torino; Caterina
| | - Umberto Vitolo
- Teodoro Chisesi, Ospedale Civile S.S. Giovanni e Paolo, Venezia; Monica Bellei, Stefano Luminari, Antonella Montanini, Luigi Marcheselli, Emanuela Anna Pesce, and Massimo Federico, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena; Alessandro Levis, A.O. S.S. Antonio e Biagio, Alessandria; Paolo Gobbi, Università di Pavia, Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia; Umberto Vitolo, Azienda Ospedaliera e Universitaria San Giovanni Battista, Torino; Caterina
| | - Caterina Stelitano
- Teodoro Chisesi, Ospedale Civile S.S. Giovanni e Paolo, Venezia; Monica Bellei, Stefano Luminari, Antonella Montanini, Luigi Marcheselli, Emanuela Anna Pesce, and Massimo Federico, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena; Alessandro Levis, A.O. S.S. Antonio e Biagio, Alessandria; Paolo Gobbi, Università di Pavia, Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia; Umberto Vitolo, Azienda Ospedaliera e Universitaria San Giovanni Battista, Torino; Caterina
| | - Vincenzo Pavone
- Teodoro Chisesi, Ospedale Civile S.S. Giovanni e Paolo, Venezia; Monica Bellei, Stefano Luminari, Antonella Montanini, Luigi Marcheselli, Emanuela Anna Pesce, and Massimo Federico, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena; Alessandro Levis, A.O. S.S. Antonio e Biagio, Alessandria; Paolo Gobbi, Università di Pavia, Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia; Umberto Vitolo, Azienda Ospedaliera e Universitaria San Giovanni Battista, Torino; Caterina
| | - Francesco Merli
- Teodoro Chisesi, Ospedale Civile S.S. Giovanni e Paolo, Venezia; Monica Bellei, Stefano Luminari, Antonella Montanini, Luigi Marcheselli, Emanuela Anna Pesce, and Massimo Federico, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena; Alessandro Levis, A.O. S.S. Antonio e Biagio, Alessandria; Paolo Gobbi, Università di Pavia, Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia; Umberto Vitolo, Azienda Ospedaliera e Universitaria San Giovanni Battista, Torino; Caterina
| | - Marina Liberati
- Teodoro Chisesi, Ospedale Civile S.S. Giovanni e Paolo, Venezia; Monica Bellei, Stefano Luminari, Antonella Montanini, Luigi Marcheselli, Emanuela Anna Pesce, and Massimo Federico, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena; Alessandro Levis, A.O. S.S. Antonio e Biagio, Alessandria; Paolo Gobbi, Università di Pavia, Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia; Umberto Vitolo, Azienda Ospedaliera e Universitaria San Giovanni Battista, Torino; Caterina
| | - Luca Baldini
- Teodoro Chisesi, Ospedale Civile S.S. Giovanni e Paolo, Venezia; Monica Bellei, Stefano Luminari, Antonella Montanini, Luigi Marcheselli, Emanuela Anna Pesce, and Massimo Federico, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena; Alessandro Levis, A.O. S.S. Antonio e Biagio, Alessandria; Paolo Gobbi, Università di Pavia, Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia; Umberto Vitolo, Azienda Ospedaliera e Universitaria San Giovanni Battista, Torino; Caterina
| | - Roberto Bordonaro
- Teodoro Chisesi, Ospedale Civile S.S. Giovanni e Paolo, Venezia; Monica Bellei, Stefano Luminari, Antonella Montanini, Luigi Marcheselli, Emanuela Anna Pesce, and Massimo Federico, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena; Alessandro Levis, A.O. S.S. Antonio e Biagio, Alessandria; Paolo Gobbi, Università di Pavia, Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia; Umberto Vitolo, Azienda Ospedaliera e Universitaria San Giovanni Battista, Torino; Caterina
| | - Emanuela Anna Pesce
- Teodoro Chisesi, Ospedale Civile S.S. Giovanni e Paolo, Venezia; Monica Bellei, Stefano Luminari, Antonella Montanini, Luigi Marcheselli, Emanuela Anna Pesce, and Massimo Federico, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena; Alessandro Levis, A.O. S.S. Antonio e Biagio, Alessandria; Paolo Gobbi, Università di Pavia, Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia; Umberto Vitolo, Azienda Ospedaliera e Universitaria San Giovanni Battista, Torino; Caterina
| | - Massimo Federico
- Teodoro Chisesi, Ospedale Civile S.S. Giovanni e Paolo, Venezia; Monica Bellei, Stefano Luminari, Antonella Montanini, Luigi Marcheselli, Emanuela Anna Pesce, and Massimo Federico, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena; Alessandro Levis, A.O. S.S. Antonio e Biagio, Alessandria; Paolo Gobbi, Università di Pavia, Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia; Umberto Vitolo, Azienda Ospedaliera e Universitaria San Giovanni Battista, Torino; Caterina
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ansell SM. Annual clinical updates in hematological malignancies: a continuing medical education series. Hodgkin lymphoma: 2011 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am J Hematol 2011; 86:851-8. [PMID: 21922525 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.22105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
DISEASE OVERVIEW Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is an uncommon B-cell lymphoid malignancy affecting 8,500 new patients annually and representing approximately 11% of all lymphomas in the United States. DIAGNOSIS HL is composed of two distinct disease entities; the more commonly diagnosed classical HL and the rare nodular lymphocyte predominant HL. Nodular sclerosis, mixed cellularity, lymphocyte depletion, and lymphocyte-rich HL are subgroups under the designation of classical HL. RISK STRATIFICATION An accurate assessment of the stage of disease in patients with HL is critical for the selection of the appropriate therapy. Prognostic models that identify patients at low or high risk for recurrence are used to optimize therapy for patients with limited or advanced stage disease. RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY Initial therapy for HL patients is based on the histology of the disease, the anatomical stage, and the presence of poor prognostic features. Patients with early stage disease are treated with combined modality strategies using abbreviated courses of combination chemotherapy followed by involved-field radiation therapy, while those with advanced stage disease receive a longer course of chemotherapy often without radiation therapy. MANAGEMENT OF RELAPSED/REFRACTORY DISEASE High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by an autologous stem-cell transplant (ASCT) is the standard of care for most patients who relapse following initial therapy. For patients who fail HDCT with ASCT, palliative chemotherapy, nonmyeloablative allogeneic transplant, or participation in a clinical trial should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen M Ansell
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hodgkin's Lymphoma in Children and Adolescents: A Saint Petersburg Hodgkin's Lymphoma Group Study. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2011; 2011:958435. [PMID: 21772850 PMCID: PMC3136222 DOI: 10.1155/2011/958435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2010] [Revised: 02/10/2011] [Accepted: 03/23/2011] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Purpose. Prospective analysis of the efficacy of the original protocol SPbHL-05 was performed.
Patients and Methods. Sixty patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) aged less than 18 years old were treated in accordance with SPbHL-05 from January 2000, to July 2009. In induction chemotherapy we used VBVP and ABVD schedules followed by involved-field radiotherapy. Fourteen patients (23,3%) with 0–2 adverse factors (the favourable group) received two cycles of chemotherapy (VBVP), 25 children (41,7%) with 3-4 unfavorable signs (the intermediate group) received two cycles of VBVP alternating with two cycles of ABVD, 21 patient (35%) who had 5 or more adverse prognostic factors (the unfavourable group) received three cycles of VBVP alternating with three cycles of ABVD. Results. With a median follow-up of 68 months, overall survival (OS) at 5 years is 91.3%, event-free survival (EFS) is 82.8%. OS in the favourable and intermediate risk group were 100%, EFS were 92,9% and 90,7%, respectively, OS and EFS in unfavourable risk group—77,1% and 55,6%, respectively.
Conclusion. The identification of prognostic risk factors and using medicines with less prominent side effects would be of major importance in the development of new strategies of treatment for childhood HL.
Collapse
|
23
|
Richardson SE, McNamara C. The Management of Classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Past, Present, and Future. Adv Hematol 2011; 2011:865870. [PMID: 21687653 PMCID: PMC3112512 DOI: 10.1155/2011/865870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2010] [Accepted: 11/15/2010] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
The management of classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (CHL) is a success story of modern multi-agent haemato-oncology. Prior to the middle of the twentieth century CHL was fatal in the majority of cases. Introduction of single agent radiotherapy (RT) demonstrated for the first time that these patients could be cured. Developments in chemotherapy including the mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine and prednisolone (MOPP) and Adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (ABVD) regimens have resulted in cure rates of over 80%. Even in relapse, CHL patients can be salvaged with high dose chemotherapy and autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Challenges remain, however, in finding new strategies to manage the small number of patients who continue to relapse or progress. In addition, the young age of many Hodgkin's patients forces difficult decisions in balancing the benefit of early disease control against the survival disadvantage of late toxicity. In this article we aim to summarise past trials, define the current standard of care and appraise future developments in the management of CHL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. E. Richardson
- Department of Haematology, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London NW3 2TB, UK
| | - C. McNamara
- Department of Haematology, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London NW3 2TB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Presentation of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is distinctive in the infected individual being more advanced, accompanied by B symptoms and the presence of extranodal disease particularly lymphadenopathy of the head and neck. Bone marrow involvement may be found in over 50% of cases. Virtually all co express gamma-herpesvirus. Phenotypically there is prominence of the mixed-cellularity and lymphocyte depleted histopathologic subtypes that define an aggressive clinical course in comparison to other variants. Prior to the induction of cART, median survival was only 1-2 years. Notably the first chemotherapy trial using ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) in 21 patients, without treating the viral infection, resulted in a 43% complete remission rate accompanied by severe haematological toxicities but did not extend median survival with this being 1.5 years matching the negative cases. Significant change accompanied concomitant anti-retroviral therapy that could be given safely even with dose intensive regimens exemplified by BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone) in 12 patients or the Stanford V regimen (doxorubicin, vinblastine, mechlorethamine, etoposide, vincristine, bleomycin, prednisone) coupled with involved-field radiation for bulky disease studied in 59 patients. BEACOPP extended overall survival (OS) to 83% at 2 years. A similar trend was seen when using the Stanford V regimen with an OS rate of 51% at 3 years, disease-free survival (DFS) of 68% and freedom from progression (FFP) in 60%. Additional benefits accrued from supportive care with stimulatory peptides such as G-CSF and when combined with bacterial prophylaxis results approached that found in the uninfected reference group. Current consensus holds this particular lymphoma as still among the non-AIDS defining cancers being lung, stomach, liver or anal despite these having recently gained more attention as several of these neoplasms may be occurring more commonly in the era of cART. While the relative risk of developing a non-AIDS-defining neoplasm in HIV-infected persons on the average is 2-3 times, the risk for developing HL in HIV-infected cases impressively ranges between 5 and 25 times when compared to the general population. Based on the precedent in which Kaposi sarcoma and the non-Hodgkin lymphomas distinctively alter the course of this retroviral infection in a way indistinguishable from concurrent Hodgkin lymphoma we propose that this entity be similarly regarded and the hypothesis tested in large randomised prospective study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerhard Sissolak
- Division of Clinical Haematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg Academic Hospital, South Africa
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Yarbro LM, Solimando DA, Waddell JA. Stanford V Regimen for Hodgkin Lymphoma. Hosp Pharm 2010. [DOI: 10.1310/hpj4512-906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The complexity of cancer chemotherapy requires pharmacists be familiar with the complicated regimens and highly toxic agents used. This column reviews various issues related to preparation, dispensing, and administration of antineoplastic therapy, and the agents, both commercially available and investigational, used to treat malignant diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura M. Yarbro
- Oncology Pharmacy Resident (PGY2) at the Southern Arizona Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Tucson, Arizona
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Outpatient reduced-intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation for patients with refractory or relapsed lymphomas compared with autologous stem cell transplantation using a simplified method. Ann Hematol 2010; 89:1045-52. [DOI: 10.1007/s00277-010-0986-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2010] [Accepted: 05/04/2010] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
27
|
Puig N, Pintilie M, Seshadri T, Al-Farsi K, Nagy T, Franke N, Tsang R, Keating A, Crump M, Kuruvilla J. Different response to salvage chemotherapy but similar post-transplant outcomes in patients with relapsed and refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma. Haematologica 2010; 95:1496-502. [PMID: 20460643 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2009.019943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with relapsed Hodgkin's lymphoma is supported by two randomized clinical trials but its benefit in patients with primary refractory disease is less clear. Aiming to shed light on this issue, we analyzed and compared the outcomes of patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with second-line chemotherapy and planned autologous stem-cell transplantation. DESIGN AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data on 157 consecutive patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma referred to our institution for consideration of autologous stem-cell transplantation between 1999 and 2006. Of those, 73 met the definition of having primary refractory disease, ie. progressive disease during first line chemotherapy or within 3 months of completion of the treatment. Those patients achieving complete remission, partial remission and stable disease with symptomatic improvement after two or three cycles of salvage chemotherapy proceeded to stem cell mobilization and autologous transplantation. RESULTS From first relapse/progression, the 3-year overall survival was 76% (95% CI: 66%-89%) for the refractory cohort and 91% (95% CI: 84%-98%) for the relapsed cohort (P=0.034); the overall response rate to second-line chemotherapy was 51% and 83% (P<0.0001), respectively. Three-year progression-free survival post-transplant was 49% in refractory patients and 67% in relapsed patients (P=0.21); overall survival was 75% and 91% (P=0.097), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Using the group with relapsed disease as a reference, we can conclude that the subset of patients with chemosensitive primary refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma do benefit from autologous stem-cell transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noemi Puig
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Hospital, 610 University Avenue, Room 5-221, Toronto M5G 2M9, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
Non-Hodgkin (NHL) and Hodgkin (HL) lymphomas are represented prominently in the adolescent and young adult (AYA) population. These diseases represent 11% of total cancer diagnoses in children, 4% in those 40 years of age and older, and 13% in AYA (aged 15-39 years). Although age-adjusted incidence rates of NHL increase with age, the more aggressive lymphomas are seen more commonly in the younger population with a transition to low-grade, indolent subtypes as the population ages. Burkitt lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, lymphoblastic lymphoma, and anaplastic large cell lymphoma make up the most common subtypes in the AYA population, although within the subgroup age 30-39 years, follicular lymphoma becomes more prominent. As a result, much of the armamentarium in the treatment of aggressive NHL and HL in adults is based on data from pediatric clinical trials. There are obvious limitations to this approach. It is vital that we gain a more thorough understanding of the biology and therapeutic responsiveness of NHL and HL in the AYA population. Thus, we must leverage the large prospective and retrospective trials that have been completed to date and redirect our approaches to cancer care in this unique population. We review the epidemiological data on NHL and HL from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registries as a cornerstone for a comparative analysis of therapeutic outcomes available in this population.
Collapse
|
29
|
Hoskin PJ, Lowry L, Horwich A, Jack A, Mead B, Hancock BW, Smith P, Qian W, Patrick P, Popova B, Pettitt A, Cunningham D, Pettengell R, Sweetenham J, Linch D, Johnson PW. Randomized Comparison of the Stanford V Regimen and ABVD in the Treatment of Advanced Hodgkin's Lymphoma: United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute Lymphoma Group Study ISRCTN 64141244. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:5390-6. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.23.3239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 142] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial compared the efficacy and toxicity of two chemotherapy regimens in advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL): the weekly alternating Stanford V and the standard, twice-weekly regimen of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD). Patients and Methods Patients had stage IIB, III, or IV disease or had stages I to IIA disease with bulky disease or other adverse features. Radiotherapy was administered in both arms to sites of previous bulk (> 5 cm) and to splenic deposits, although this was omitted in the latter part of the trial for patients achieving complete remission (CR) in the ABVD arm. A total of 520 patients were randomly assigned and were assessed for the primary outcome measure of progression-free survival (PFS). Five hundred patients received protocol treatment, and radiotherapy was administered to 73% in the Stanford V arm and to 53% in the ABVD arm. Results The overall response rates after completion of all treatment were 91% for Stanford V and 92% for ABVD. During a median follow-up of 4.3 years, there was no evidence of a difference in projected 5-year PFS and overall survival (OS) rates (76% and 90%, respectively, for ABVD; 74% and 92%, respectively, for Stanford V). More pulmonary toxicity was reported for ABVD, whereas other toxicities were more frequent with Stanford V. Conclusion In a large, randomized trial, the efficacies of Stanford V and ABVD were comparable when given in combination with appropriate radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J. Hoskin
- From the Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Department of Clinical Oncology; Lymphoma Trials Office, Cancer Research United Kingdom and University College London Cancer Trials Centre; Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital; Medical Research Council Cancer Trials Unit; St George's Hospital Medical School; Royal Marsden Hospital; and University College London Cancer Institute, London; St James' Institute of Oncology, Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, Leeds
| | - Lisa Lowry
- From the Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Department of Clinical Oncology; Lymphoma Trials Office, Cancer Research United Kingdom and University College London Cancer Trials Centre; Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital; Medical Research Council Cancer Trials Unit; St George's Hospital Medical School; Royal Marsden Hospital; and University College London Cancer Institute, London; St James' Institute of Oncology, Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, Leeds
| | - Alan Horwich
- From the Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Department of Clinical Oncology; Lymphoma Trials Office, Cancer Research United Kingdom and University College London Cancer Trials Centre; Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital; Medical Research Council Cancer Trials Unit; St George's Hospital Medical School; Royal Marsden Hospital; and University College London Cancer Institute, London; St James' Institute of Oncology, Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, Leeds
| | - Andrew Jack
- From the Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Department of Clinical Oncology; Lymphoma Trials Office, Cancer Research United Kingdom and University College London Cancer Trials Centre; Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital; Medical Research Council Cancer Trials Unit; St George's Hospital Medical School; Royal Marsden Hospital; and University College London Cancer Institute, London; St James' Institute of Oncology, Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, Leeds
| | - Ben Mead
- From the Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Department of Clinical Oncology; Lymphoma Trials Office, Cancer Research United Kingdom and University College London Cancer Trials Centre; Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital; Medical Research Council Cancer Trials Unit; St George's Hospital Medical School; Royal Marsden Hospital; and University College London Cancer Institute, London; St James' Institute of Oncology, Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, Leeds
| | - Barry W. Hancock
- From the Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Department of Clinical Oncology; Lymphoma Trials Office, Cancer Research United Kingdom and University College London Cancer Trials Centre; Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital; Medical Research Council Cancer Trials Unit; St George's Hospital Medical School; Royal Marsden Hospital; and University College London Cancer Institute, London; St James' Institute of Oncology, Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, Leeds
| | - Paul Smith
- From the Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Department of Clinical Oncology; Lymphoma Trials Office, Cancer Research United Kingdom and University College London Cancer Trials Centre; Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital; Medical Research Council Cancer Trials Unit; St George's Hospital Medical School; Royal Marsden Hospital; and University College London Cancer Institute, London; St James' Institute of Oncology, Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, Leeds
| | - Wendi Qian
- From the Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Department of Clinical Oncology; Lymphoma Trials Office, Cancer Research United Kingdom and University College London Cancer Trials Centre; Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital; Medical Research Council Cancer Trials Unit; St George's Hospital Medical School; Royal Marsden Hospital; and University College London Cancer Institute, London; St James' Institute of Oncology, Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, Leeds
| | - Philippa Patrick
- From the Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Department of Clinical Oncology; Lymphoma Trials Office, Cancer Research United Kingdom and University College London Cancer Trials Centre; Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital; Medical Research Council Cancer Trials Unit; St George's Hospital Medical School; Royal Marsden Hospital; and University College London Cancer Institute, London; St James' Institute of Oncology, Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, Leeds
| | - Bilyana Popova
- From the Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Department of Clinical Oncology; Lymphoma Trials Office, Cancer Research United Kingdom and University College London Cancer Trials Centre; Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital; Medical Research Council Cancer Trials Unit; St George's Hospital Medical School; Royal Marsden Hospital; and University College London Cancer Institute, London; St James' Institute of Oncology, Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, Leeds
| | - Andrew Pettitt
- From the Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Department of Clinical Oncology; Lymphoma Trials Office, Cancer Research United Kingdom and University College London Cancer Trials Centre; Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital; Medical Research Council Cancer Trials Unit; St George's Hospital Medical School; Royal Marsden Hospital; and University College London Cancer Institute, London; St James' Institute of Oncology, Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, Leeds
| | - David Cunningham
- From the Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Department of Clinical Oncology; Lymphoma Trials Office, Cancer Research United Kingdom and University College London Cancer Trials Centre; Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital; Medical Research Council Cancer Trials Unit; St George's Hospital Medical School; Royal Marsden Hospital; and University College London Cancer Institute, London; St James' Institute of Oncology, Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, Leeds
| | - Ruth Pettengell
- From the Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Department of Clinical Oncology; Lymphoma Trials Office, Cancer Research United Kingdom and University College London Cancer Trials Centre; Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital; Medical Research Council Cancer Trials Unit; St George's Hospital Medical School; Royal Marsden Hospital; and University College London Cancer Institute, London; St James' Institute of Oncology, Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, Leeds
| | - John Sweetenham
- From the Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Department of Clinical Oncology; Lymphoma Trials Office, Cancer Research United Kingdom and University College London Cancer Trials Centre; Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital; Medical Research Council Cancer Trials Unit; St George's Hospital Medical School; Royal Marsden Hospital; and University College London Cancer Institute, London; St James' Institute of Oncology, Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, Leeds
| | - David Linch
- From the Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Department of Clinical Oncology; Lymphoma Trials Office, Cancer Research United Kingdom and University College London Cancer Trials Centre; Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital; Medical Research Council Cancer Trials Unit; St George's Hospital Medical School; Royal Marsden Hospital; and University College London Cancer Institute, London; St James' Institute of Oncology, Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, Leeds
| | - Peter W.M. Johnson
- From the Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Department of Clinical Oncology; Lymphoma Trials Office, Cancer Research United Kingdom and University College London Cancer Trials Centre; Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital; Medical Research Council Cancer Trials Unit; St George's Hospital Medical School; Royal Marsden Hospital; and University College London Cancer Institute, London; St James' Institute of Oncology, Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, Leeds
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Aversa SML, Trentin C, Sorarů M, Di Bona E, Marino D, Canova F, Salvagno L, Adami F. Acute promyelocytic leukemia after Stanford V plus radiotherapy for advanced Hodgkin lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma 2009; 50:1214-6. [PMID: 19557643 DOI: 10.1080/10428190902934910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
31
|
Panizo C, Pérez-Salazar M, Bendandi M, Rodríguez-Calvillo M, Boán JF, García-Velloso MJ, Richter J, Rocha E. Positron Emission Tomography Using 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose for the Evaluation of Residual Hodgkin's Disease Mediastinal Masses. Leuk Lymphoma 2009; 45:1829-33. [PMID: 15223643 DOI: 10.1080/1042819042000223813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Given its obvious prognostic implications, the correct interpretation of the significance of any residual mediastinal mass following Hodgkin's disease (HD) treatment keeps maintaining its paramount importance. In this respect, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) is proving very effective for both active disease detection and relapse prediction. Twenty-nine consecutive HD patients, in whom computed tomography (CT) scan performed after therapy completion had documented a residual mediatinal mass of at least 2 cm, prospectively entered the study and underwent PET within 1 week from CT scan. With a median follow-up of 28 months from PET execution, no relapse was recorded among the 17 patients presenting with a negative PET. On the contrary, 9 of the 12 patients presenting with a positive PET relapsed/progressed within one year from PET execution. PET's negative and positive predictive values at 1 year were 100% and 75%, respectively. A negative PET seems to possibly exclude relapse in HD patient with a residual mediastinal mass. On the contrary, a positive PET result indicates a significantly higher risk of relapse. However, due to possible false positive results, a closer follow-up for all and a pathologic study in few selected patients is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Panizo
- Department of Hematology, University Clinic, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Brepoels L, Stroobants S, De Wever W, Spaepen K, Vandenberghe P, Thomas J, Uyttebroeck A, Mortelmans L, De Wolf-Peeters C, Verhoef G. Hodgkin lymphoma: Response assessment by Revised International Workshop Criteria. Leuk Lymphoma 2009; 48:1539-47. [PMID: 17701585 DOI: 10.1080/10428190701422414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Until recently, response assessment in patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) was primarily performed by computed tomography (CT). Based on CT, International Workshop Criteria (IWC) were developed and widely used. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has a higher sensitivity and specificity compared with that of CT, and Revised International Workshop Criteria (IWC + PET) were recently proposed, which combine both imaging techniques. We determined whether these integrated IWC + PET-criteria can more accurately predict outcome compared with IWC-criteria in 56 patients with HL. Of the original 56 patients, nine patients relapsed and 47 are still in remission after a median follow-up of 9 years. Based on IWC-criteria, 15 patients had a complete remission (CR) after chemotherapy, 20 had complete remission unconfirmed (CRu), 19 had partial remission (PR) and two had stable disease (SD). In comparison, by IWC + PET, 47 had CR, seven had PR and two had SD. For IWC, outcome was not significantly different in patients with CR/CRu compared to PR (P = 0.61), while for IWC + PET criteria, time-to-next-treatment was significantly shorter in patients with PR compared to CR (P = 0.01). Therefore, IWC + PET-guidelines provide a more accurate response classification compared with that of IWC-guidelines, and are the preferred method for response assessment in patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lieselot Brepoels
- Departments of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Gasthuisberg and Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Verholen F, Terrettaz M, Roosnek E, Passweg JR, Chalandon Y. Hodgkin's lymphoma relapsing after autologous transplantation: allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using a strategy of reduced intensity conditioning, and T-cell depletion with T-cell add-back. Eur J Haematol 2009; 83:273-5. [PMID: 19500136 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2009.01282.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
34
|
Abuzetun JY, Loberiza F, Vose J, Bierman P, Greg Bociek R, Enke C, Bast M, Weisenburger D, Armitage JO. The Stanford V regimen is effective in patients with good risk Hodgkin lymphoma but radiotherapy is a necessary component. Br J Haematol 2009; 144:531-7. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07500.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
35
|
Giantonio BJ, Forastiere AA, Comis RL. The Role of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group in Establishing Standards of Cancer Care: Over 50 Years of Progress Through Clinical Research. Semin Oncol 2008; 35:494-506. [DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2008.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
36
|
|
37
|
Abstract
Hodgkin's disease is a rare malignancy that affects approximately 7,500 patients per year in the U.S., leading to an estimated 1,400 deaths. The relapse rate for this disease varies from around 5% for early-stage disease to 35% for patients with advanced disease. Patients who relapse after chemotherapy have about a 20% cure rate with conventional salvage chemotherapy. Two randomized phase III studies have shown an improved failure-free survival rate with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell support compared with conventional chemotherapy in relapsed patients. They failed to show any improvement in overall survival. For patients who experience failure with autologous transplant, the options of single-agent chemotherapy with gemcitabine, vinblastine, or vinorelbine can be used for palliation. Standard myeloablative allogeneic bone marrow transplant has a high mortality rate in this population. Allogeneic transplant regimens with reduced intensity are currently being studied in clinical trials. Further studies on the use of monoclonal antibodies and radiolabeled antibodies need to be conducted to define their role in the treatment of Hodgkin's disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian J Byrne
- Duke University Medical Center, Box 3841, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Aleman BMP, Raemaekers JMM, Tomiŝiĉ R, Baaijens MHA, Bortolus R, Lybeert MLM, van der Maazen RWM, Girinsky T, Demeestere G, Lugtenburg P, Lievens Y, de Jong D, Pinna A, Henry-Amar M. Involved-field radiotherapy for patients in partial remission after chemotherapy for advanced Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007; 67:19-30. [PMID: 17097834 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.08.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2006] [Revised: 08/21/2006] [Accepted: 08/21/2006] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The use of radiotherapy in patients with advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) is controversial. The purpose of this study was to describe the role of radiotherapy in patients with advanced HL who were in partial remission (PR) after chemotherapy. METHODS In a prospective randomized trial, patients <70 years old with previously untreated Stage III-IV HL were treated with six to eight cycles of mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone/doxorubicin, bleomycine, vinblastine hybrid chemotherapy. Patients in complete remission (CR) after chemotherapy were randomized between no further treatment and involved-field radiotherapy (IF-RT). Those in PR after six cycles received IF-RT (30 Gy to originally involved nodal areas and 18-24 Gy to extranodal sites with or without a boost). RESULTS Of 739 enrolled patients, 57% were in CR and 33% in PR after chemotherapy. The median follow-up was 7.8 years. Patients in PR had bulky mediastinal involvement significantly more often than did those in CR after chemotherapy. The 8-year event-free survival and overall survival rate for the 227 patients in PR who received IF-RT was 76% and 84%, respectively. These rates were not significantly different from those for CR patients who received IF-RT (73% and 78%) or for those in CR who did not receive IF-RT (77% and 85%). The incidence of second malignancies in patients in PR who were treated with IF-RT was similar to that in nonirradiated patients. CONCLUSION Patients in PR after six cycles of mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone/doxorubicine, bleomycine, vinblastine treated with IF-RT had 8-year event-free survival and overall survival rates similar to those of patients in CR, suggesting a definite role for RT in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berthe M P Aleman
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Alvarez I, Sureda A, Caballero MD, Urbano-Ispizua A, Ribera JM, Canales M, García-Conde J, Sanz G, Arranz R, Bernal MT, de la Serna J, Díez JL, Moraleda JM, Rubió-Félix D, Xicoy B, Martínez C, Mateos MV, Sierra J. Nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation is an effective therapy for refractory or relapsed hodgkin lymphoma: results of a spanish prospective cooperative protocol. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2006; 12:172-83. [PMID: 16443515 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2005.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 125] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2005] [Accepted: 09/20/2005] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
We report the results of reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-RIC) in patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Forty patients with relapsed or refractory HL were homogeneously treated with an RIC protocol (fludarabine 150 mg/m(2) intravenously plus melphalan 140 mg/m(2) intravenously) and cyclosporin A and methotrexate as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Twenty-one patients (53%) had received >2 lines of chemotherapy, 23 patients (58%) had received radiotherapy, and 29 patients (73%) had experienced treatment failure with a previous autologous stem cell transplantation. Twenty patients (50%) were allografted in resistant relapse, and 38 patients received hematopoietic cells from an HLA-identical sibling. Five patients (12%) died from early transplant-related mortality (before day +100 after allo-RIC). One-year transplant-related mortality was 25%. Acute GVHD developed in 18 patients (45%). Chronic GVHD developed in 17 (45%) of the 31 evaluable patients. The response rate 3 months after the allo-RIC was 67% (21 [52%] complete remissions and 6 [15%] partial remissions). Eleven patients received donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs) for disease relapse. The response rate after DLI was 54% (3 complete remissions and 3 partial remissions). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 48% +/- 10% and 32% +/- 10% at 2 years, respectively. Refractoriness to chemotherapy was the only adverse prognostic factor for both OS (63% +/- 12% versus 35% +/- 13%; P = .05) and PFS (55% +/- 16% versus 10% +/- 9%; P = .006). For patients with failure of a prior autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, results were especially good for those who experienced late relapses (>/=12 months: 2-year OS and PFS were 75% +/- 16% and 70% +/- 18%, respectively). These data suggest that allo-RIC is feasible in heavily pretreated HL patients and has an acceptable early transplant-related mortality. Results are better in patients allografted in sensitive disease. Both responses observed after the development of GVHD and DLI may suggest a graft-versus-HL effect. Allo-RIC has to be considered an effective therapeutic approach for patients who have had treatment failure with a previous autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iván Alvarez
- Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
Radiation therapy continues to play a paramount role in the therapy of hematologic malignancies, whether as definitive therapy, as consolidation after chemotherapy, as part of bone marrow transplantation protocols, or in palliation. During the past 2 decades, significant advances in radiation therapy have occurred, including the evolution of involved-field irradiation and the adoption of conformal radiation administration. It is hoped that modern techniques will reduce the long-term sequelae associated with radiation-based treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chung K Lee
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology-Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Affiliation(s)
- Richard W Tsang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
Approximately 7350 new cases of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) are diagnosed annually in the United States. The Incidence of HL has a bimodal pattern, with the highest incidence seen in young adults and in elderly patients. The disease is composed of 2 distinct entities: the more commonly diagnosed classical HL and the rare nodular lymphocyte-predominant HL. Classical HL includes the subgroups nodular sclerosis, mixed cellularity, lymphocyte depletion, and lymphocyte rich. Selection of the appropriate therapy Is based on accurately assessing the stage of disease. Patients with early-stage disease are treated with combined modality strategies using abbreviated courses of combination chemotherapy followed by Involved-field radiation therapy, whereas those with advanced-stage disease receive a longer course of chemotherapy without radiation therapy. Currently, more than 80% of all patients with newly diagnosed HL are expected to be long-term survivors. Although many patients respond well to initial therapies and have durable long-term remissions, a subset of patients has resistant disease and experiences relapse even after subsequent high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. New therapies are clearly needed for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen M Ansell
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minn 55905, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Borchmann P, Behringer K, Josting A, Rueffer JU, Schnell R, Diehl V, Engert A, Kvasnicka HM, Thiele J. [Secondary malignancies after successful primary treatment of malignant Hodgkin's lymphoma]. DER PATHOLOGE 2005; 27:47-52. [PMID: 16369761 DOI: 10.1007/s00292-005-0811-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Malignant Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) has become a curable disease through the increasing intensity of the treatment strategies applied. These regimens are aggressive, including radiotherapy and chemotherapy leading to the possibility of secondary malignancies. The German Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group considered three cohorts including 5,411 patients with all stages of HL. In 127 patients a secondary solid tumor was diagnosed (cumulative risk 2%, median follow-up 72 months), with bronchial carcinomas (23.6%) and colorectal adenocarcinomas (20.5%) being the most frequent neoplasms. Secondary acute myeloid leukemia was found in 36 patients, another ten developed myeloid dysplasia (cumulative risk 1%, median follow-up 55 months). A total of 52 patients revealed a non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL; cumulative risk 0.9%, median follow-up 46 months). The overall incidence of secondary malignancies was 3.9% in patients who had been treated successfully for their HL with radio- and/or chemotherapy.A secondary NHL can be particularly difficult to be distinguished from the preceding HL. Therefore, in case of a suspected relapse, a complete histopathological work-up must be performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Borchmann
- Klinik I für Innere Medizin, Universität zu Köln, Joseph-Stelzmannstrasse 9, 50924 Köln
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Carde P. The Chemotherapy/Radiation Balance in Advanced Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Overweight Which Side? J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:9058-62. [PMID: 16314611 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2005.04.4644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
45
|
Gobbi PG, Levis A, Chisesi T, Broglia C, Vitolo U, Stelitano C, Pavone V, Cavanna L, Santini G, Merli F, Liberati M, Baldini L, Deliliers GL, Angelucci E, Bordonaro R, Federico M. ABVD Versus Modified Stanford V Versus MOPPEBVCAD With Optional and Limited Radiotherapy in Intermediate- and Advanced-Stage Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Final Results of a Multicenter Randomized Trial by the Intergruppo Italiano Linfomi. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:9198-207. [PMID: 16172458 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2005.02.907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose In this multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial on advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), the efficacy and toxicity of two chemotherapy regimens, doxorubicin, vinblastine, mechlorethamine, vincristine, bleomycin, etoposide, and prednisone (Stanford V) and mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone, epidoxirubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, lomustine, doxorubicin, and vindesine (MOPPEBVCAD), were compared with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) as standard therapy to select which regimen would best support a reduced radiotherapy program, which was limited to ≤ two sites of either previous bulky or partially remitting disease (a modification of the original Stanford program). Patients and Methods Three hundred fifty-five patients with stage IIB, III, or IV HL were randomly assigned. Three hundred thirty-four patients were assessable for the study and received six cycles of ABVD (n = 122), three cycles of Stanford V (n = 107), or six cycles of MOPPEBVCAD (n = 106); radiotherapy was administered to 76, 71, and 50 patients in these three arms, respectively. Results The complete response rates for ABVD, Stanford V, and MOPPEBVCAD were 89%, 76% and 94%, respectively; 5-year failure-free survival (FFS) and progression-free survival rates were 78%, 54%, 81% and 85%, 73%, and 94%, respectively (P < .01 for comparison of Stanford V with the other two regimens). Corresponding 5-year overall survival rates were 90%, 82%, and 89% for ABVD, Stanford V, and MOPPEBVCAD, respectively. Stanford V was more myelotoxic than ABVD but less myelotoxic than MOPPEBVCAD, which had larger reductions in the prescribed drug doses. Conclusion When associated with conditioned and limited (not adjuvant) radiotherapy, ABVD and MOPPEBVCAD were superior to Stanford V chemotherapy in terms of response rate and FFS and progression-free survival. Patients were irradiated less often after MOPPEBVCAD, but this regimen was more toxic. ABVD is still the best choice when it is combined with optional, limited irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo G Gobbi
- Medicina Interna e Oncologia Medica, Università di Pavia, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kelloff GJ, Hoffman JM, Johnson B, Scher HI, Siegel BA, Cheng EY, Cheson BD, O'shaughnessy J, Guyton KZ, Mankoff DA, Shankar L, Larson SM, Sigman CC, Schilsky RL, Sullivan DC. Progress and promise of FDG-PET imaging for cancer patient management and oncologic drug development. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11:2785-808. [PMID: 15837727 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-04-2626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 455] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
2-[(18)F]Fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) assesses a fundamental property of neoplasia, the Warburg effect. This molecular imaging technique offers a complementary approach to anatomic imaging that is more sensitive and specific in certain cancers. FDG-PET has been widely applied in oncology primarily as a staging and restaging tool that can guide patient care. However, because it accurately detects recurrent or residual disease, FDG-PET also has significant potential for assessing therapy response. In this regard, it can improve patient management by identifying responders early, before tumor size is reduced; nonresponders could discontinue futile therapy. Moreover, a reduction in the FDG-PET signal within days or weeks of initiating therapy (e.g., in lymphoma, non-small cell lung, and esophageal cancer) significantly correlates with prolonged survival and other clinical end points now used in drug approvals. These findings suggest that FDG-PET could facilitate drug development as an early surrogate of clinical benefit. This article reviews the scientific basis of FDG-PET and its development and application as a valuable oncology imaging tool. Its potential to facilitate drug development in seven oncologic settings (lung, lymphoma, breast, prostate, sarcoma, colorectal, and ovary) is addressed. Recommendations include initial validation against approved therapies, retrospective analyses to define the magnitude of change indicative of response, further prospective validation as a surrogate of clinical benefit, and application as a phase II/III trial end point to accelerate evaluation and approval of novel regimens and therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary J Kelloff
- Cancer Imaging Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
AbstractReclassification of Hodgkin disease as Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) represents a milestone in the lymphoma field, awarding recent insights in the molecular biology of Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg (H-RS) cells and their environment. This review summarizes antiapoptotic and proproliferative pathways involved in the pathogenesis of this disease with the ultimate goal of translating laboratory knowledge into clinical decision making. The focus is on potential targets and novel drugs, which are discussed in the context of the complex biology of HL. Considering that HL patients are more likely to die from acute and late treatment-related toxicities than from HL itself, the introduction of targeted, biologically based therapies for HL patients with palliative and eventually curative intention might be justified. (Blood. 2005;105:4553-4560)
Collapse
|
48
|
Bollard CM, Aguilar L, Straathof KC, Gahn B, Huls MH, Rousseau A, Sixbey J, Gresik MV, Carrum G, Hudson M, Dilloo D, Gee A, Brenner MK, Rooney CM, Heslop HE. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte therapy for Epstein-Barr virus+ Hodgkin's disease. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2005; 200:1623-33. [PMID: 15611290 PMCID: PMC2211993 DOI: 10.1084/jem.20040890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 285] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Epstein Barr virus (EBV)+ Hodgkin's disease (HD) expresses clearly identified tumor antigens derived from the virus and could, in principle, be a target for adoptive immunotherapy with viral antigen–specific T cells. However, like most tumor-associated antigens in immunocompetent hosts, these potential targets are only weakly immunogenic, consisting primarily of the latent membrane protein (LMP)1 and LMP2 antigens. Moreover, Hodgkin tumors possess a range of tumor evasion strategies. Therefore, the likely value of immunotherapy with EBV-specific cytotoxic effector cells has been questioned. We have now used a combination of gene marking, tetramer, and functional analyses to track the fate and assess the activity of EBV cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) lines administered to 14 patients treated for relapsed EBV+ HD. Gene marking studies showed that infused effector cells could further expand by several logs in vivo, contribute to the memory pool (persisting up to 12 mo), and traffic to tumor sites. Tetramer and functional analyses showed that T cells reactive with the tumor-associated antigen LMP2 were present in the infused lines, expanded in peripheral blood after infusion, and also entered tumor. Viral load decreased, demonstrating the biologic activity of the infused CTLs. Clinically, EBV CTLs were well tolerated, could control type B symptoms (fever, night sweats, and weight loss), and had antitumor activity. After CTL infusion, five patients were in complete remission at up to 40 mo, two of whom had clearly measurable tumor at the time of treatment. One additional patient had a partial response, and five had stable disease. The performance and fate of these human tumor antigen–specific T cells in vivo suggests that they might be of value for the treatment of EBV+ Hodgkin lymphoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine M Bollard
- Center for Gene and Cell Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine, 6621 Fannin St., MC 3-3320, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Czyz J, Dziadziuszko R, Knopinska-Postuszuy W, Hellmann A, Kachel L, Holowiecki J, Gozdzik J, Hansz J, Avigdor A, Nagler A, Osowiecki M, Walewski J, Mensah P, Jurczak W, Skotnicki A, Sedzimirska M, Lange A, Sawicki W, Sulek K, Wach M, Dmoszynska A, Kus A, Robak T, Warzocha K. Outcome and prognostic factors in advanced Hodgkin's disease treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation: a study of 341 patients. Ann Oncol 2004; 15:1222-30. [PMID: 15277262 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdh304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The reported probability of survival of patients with Hodgkin's disease (HD) following high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (HDC/ASCT) is 35-65% at 5 years. The Polish Lymphoma Research Group investigated retrospectively prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS), and the risk of secondary malignancies in a large series of patients who underwent HDC/ASCT. PATIENTS AND METHODS The data of 341 consecutive patients treated in 10 centers from 1990 to 2002 were collected and analyzed. RESULTS The actuarial 5-year OS and EFS were 64% [95% confidence interval (CI) 57% to 71%] and 45% (95% CI 39% to 51%), respectively. In the multivariate model, unfavorable prognostic factors for EFS were less than partial response at the time of ASCT [relative risk (RR), 2.92 (95% CI 1.68-5.08); P<0.001] and three or more previous chemotherapy lines (RR, 2.16; 95% CI 1.42-3.30; P<0.001). These two factors were also associated with unfavorable OS (RR, 3.32; 95% CI 1.90-5.79; P<0.001 and RR, 2.34, 95% CI 1.51-3.64; P<0.001). Five-year cumulative risk of secondary malignancy was 8.4% (95% CI 2% to 13%) and the only identified risk factor was splenectomy (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS HDC/ASCT should be considered early in the course of disease for patients with a response after standard therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Czyz
- Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Keresztes K, Lengyel Z, Devenyi K, Vadasz G, Miltenyi Z, Illes A. Mediastinal bulky tumour in Hodgkin's disease and prognostic value of positron emission tomography in the evaluation of post-treatment residual masses. Acta Haematol 2004; 112:194-9. [PMID: 15564730 DOI: 10.1159/000081271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2003] [Accepted: 03/23/2004] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Among the 193 patients (82 female, 111 male) treated primarily for Hodgkin's disease at our clinic between 1990 and 2001 and followed up until 2003, 42 (22%) had mediastinal bulky tumours (MBTs) by the Cotswolds criteria. The rate of MBT diagnosis was significantly greater in the early stage of the disease, these patients were younger and--in contrast to the other group--they all received combined therapy. No significant differences were found in the overall and relapse-free survival rate in the two groups, but relapse and death rates were lower in the patients with bulky tumours. Of the total number of patients, 27 underwent a total of 31 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) examinations, mainly for the evaluation of post-treatment residual mass viability. In the 12 positive cases, the majority of patients received further therapy. During the mean follow-up time of 58 months (range 5-98 months) after obtaining negative results, progression of the disease was found in 2 cases 14 and 23 months later, respectively. Based on our results, we conclude that FDG-PET examinations show a good correlation with clinical follow-up results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katalin Keresztes
- Immunohaematologic Unit, Medical and Health Science Centre, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|