Alternating hepatic arterial infusion and systemic chemotherapy for liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a phase II trial using intermittent percutaneous hepatic arterial access

The Precision of Hepatic Arterial Infusion Scintigraphy as a Quantitative Biomarker of Tumor Microvasculature

OBJECTIVE

Optimal clinical development of new cancer therapies targeting tumor vasculature requires new target-specific response assays. This clinical study examined the test-retest repeatability of SPECT as an in vivo assay of angiogenic hepatic tumor microvasculature using an intraarterial infusion of 99mTc-macroaggregated albumin (MAA) delivered via a hepatic artery infusion (HAI) pump.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with primary or secondary cancerous liver tumors with HAI pump-catheter implants placed for HAI chemotherapy underwent hepatic SPECT after separate arterial infusions of 37 and 185 MBq of 99mTc-MAA via an HAI pump. Quantitative measures of hepatic tumor MAA uptake were obtained from paired test-retest SPECT datasets. Repeatability was defined by quotients of paired measurands with 95% CIs and coefficients of repeatability (CRs).

RESULTS

Test-retest HAI pump SPECT yielded highly repeatable measurements in quantitative indexes of tumor microvasculature. Variability in repeat test-retest measurements was small relative to the range of observed measurements between different tumors. The total hepatic tumor microvascular MAA accumulation (percentage injected dose) proved most repeatable, with test-retest value quotients near unity (quotients: median, 1.10 ± 0.09 [SD]; range, 1.03-1.32; 95% CI, 1.07-1.19) and 1.6% CR. Tumor MAA uptake values ranged from 5% to 18% injected dose.

CONCLUSION

This article describes the precision of HAI SPECT as a quantitative biomarker of tumor microvasculature under conditions of repeatability. The results support clinical testing of HAI SPECT as a radiologic response biomarker for angiotropic tumor therapy.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy as bridging therapy for colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has been shown to be beneficial in the management of unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). This systematic review evaluates the potential role of HAIC as a neoadjuvant downstaging therapy, prior to hepatic resection with curative intent for initially unresectable CRLM.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using Pubmed, EMBASE and Medline databases from January 2000 to November 2013. Studies adopting HAIC as a neoadjuvant bridging therapy for hepatic resection for CRLM were included.

RESULTS

Eleven studies (n = 1514) were included. HAIC response rate was 50% and achieved conversion to surgery rate in 18% of patients. The median overall and 5-year survival for patients who underwent conversion to hepatectomy was 53 months and 49% compared to 16 months and 3% for patients who did not undergo surgery. Meta-analysis demonstrated strong association between hepatectomy and improved 5-year survival (RR 0.56, 95% CI = 0.48-0.65, Z = 7.26, p < 0.00001).

CONCLUSION

For patients presenting with unresectable CRLM, HAIC in conjunction with current systemic chemotherapy may allow some patients to undergo resection and potentially provide long-term survival.

Aromatase inhibitors in post-menopausal metastatic breast carcinoma

To summarise the advances in the hormonal treatment of post-menopausal metastatic breast cancer, this paper reviews the published literature regarding the randomised trials comparing aromatase inhibitors (AIs) versus tamoxifen as a first-line therapeutic choice, or AIs versus megestrole acetate (MEG) as a second-line option. The pooled analysis of these authors on AI versus MEG as a second-line option for post-menopausal metastatic breast cancer suggested that AIs do not add any significant benefit over MEG in terms of overall response rate (ORR) and time to progression. According to the Cochrane Database, use of an AI as a second-line therapy versus any other endocrine therapy (mostly MEG) has shown a significant benefit in terms of overall survival, but not for progression-free survival, clinical benefit (CB) or ORR. Concerning the authors' comparisons between AIs versus tamoxifen as a first-line endocrine option in post-menopausal women with metastatic breast carcinoma, AIs seem to be superior to tamoxifen, with a significant benefit in terms of ORR, CB and time to progression being observed in favour of AIs over tamoxifen with fixed effects estimates. According to the Cochrane Database, there was an advantage to the use of AIs over tamoxifen in terms of progression-free survival and CB, but not for overall survival or ORR. With regards to toxicity, AIs show similar levels of hot flushes and arthralgia, increased risks of nausea, diarrhoea and vomiting, but a decreased risk of vaginal bleeding and thromboembolic events compared with other endocrine therapies. Weight gain, dyspnoea and peripheral oedema seem to be more frequent with MEG. At present, there is no proved overall survival difference in patients who are treated first with an AI and then with tamoxifen compared with the opposite sequence. In the metastatic setting, results are limited and are based on retrospective analyses.

Second- and third-generation aromatase inhibitors as first-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal metastatic breast cancer patients: a pooled analysis of the randomised trials

The purpose of this study was to estimate in all randomised trials the relative risk of overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit (CB), time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and toxicity of aromatase inhibitors (AI), compared with tamoxifen (Tam) as first-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal metastatic breast cancer (PMBC) women. Prospective randomised studies were searched through computerised queries of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) abstract database. Relative risk, 95% confidence interval, and heterogeneity were derived according to the inverse variance and Mantel-Haenszel method and Q statistics. Six phase III prospective randomised trials including 2787 women were gathered. A significant advantage in ORR (P = 0.042), TTP (P = 0.007), and CB (P = 0.001) in favour of AI over Tam was detected at the fixed effects model. These results were not significant at the random effects model, owing to the significant heterogeneity. On the contrary, no difference was registered for OS (P = 0.743) with no significant heterogeneity. Regarding toxicity, Tam caused more frequently thromboembolic events (P = 0.005) and vaginal bleeding (P = 0.001) compared with AI. Aromatase inhibitors appear to be superior to Tam as first-line endocrine option in PMBC women. Owing to a component of variability between the six studies analysed, the random effects estimates differed from corresponding fixed ones. Investigators should assess heterogeneity of trial results before deriving summary estimates of treatment effect.

Multimodal therapy with intravenous biweekly leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan combined with hepatic arterial infusion pirarubicin in non-resectable hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer (a European Association for Research in Oncology trial)

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the tolerance and efficacy of combining i.v. irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) with hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of pirarubicin in non-resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-one patients were included in a phase II trial with i.v. irinotecan/5-FU/LV administered every 2 weeks, combined with HAI pirarubicin 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 4 weeks. In most cases HAI was administered via a percutaneous catheter.

RESULTS

The main grade 3/4 toxicity was neutropenia, encountered in 78% of the patients. When all patients were considered in the analysis, tumour response rate was 15 out of 31 [48%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 32% to 65%]. Liver resection was made possible in 11 patients (35%; 95% CI 21% to 53%). There were no toxic death. Median overall survival was 20.5 months, and median progression-free survival was 9.1 months. In patients with completely resected metastases, median overall survival was not reached and median progression-free survival was 20.2 months.

CONCLUSION

The multimodality approach used in the present study was well-tolerated and yielded dramatic responses. An aggressive approach combining i.v. and HAI chemotherapy deserves further investigation.

Current treatment for liver metastases from colorectal cancer

The liver is the commonest site of distant metastasis of colorectal cancer and nearly half of the patients with colorectal cancer ultimately develop liver involved during the course of their diseases. Surgery is the only therapy that offers the possibility of cure for patients with hepatic metastatic diseases. Five-year survival rates after resection of all detectable liver metastases can be up to 40%. Unfortunately, only 25% of patients with colorectal liver metastases are candidates for liver resection, while the others are not amenable to surgical resection. Regional therapies such as radiofrequency ablation and cryotherapy may be offered to patients with isolated unresectable metastases but no extrahepatic diseases. Hepatic artery catheter chemotherapy and chemoembolization and portal vein embolization are often used for the patients with extensive liver metastases but without extrahepatic diseases, which are not suitable for regional ablation. For the patients with metastatic colorectal cancer beyond the liver, systemic chemotherapy is a more appropriate choice. Immunotherapy is also a good option when other therapies are used in combination to enhance the efficacy. Selective internal radiation therapy is a new radiation method which can be used in patients given other routine therapies without effects.

Update on clinical role of tamoxifen

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy amongst women in the United States and decreased mortality over the past decade has been attributed to a combination of screening and adjuvant therapies. There has been a resurgence of interest in hormonal therapies and this article discusses the clinical status of tamoxifen in the context of emerging alternative agents for treatment and prevention of breast cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Tamoxifen has served as a prototype for the development of selective estrogen receptor modulators at the laboratory-clinical interface. Molecular technologies have permitted elucidation of mechanisms for tissue specific action and led to newer selective estrogen receptor modulators with potentially greater antitumour efficacy and attenuated uterotrophic profile. Publications over the past 12 months have emphasized the risks of thromboembolism and endometrial carcinoma associated with tamoxifen use which has accelerated application of other hormonal agents for treatment of advanced disease and as neoadjuvant therapy. This article reviews the current role of tamoxifen in the treatment of early and advanced breast cancer together with its potential for chemoprevention. Models for quantitative risk assessment are being developed to identify women for whom chemoprotection is justified.

SUMMARY

Recent data showing a survival advantage for the aromatase inhibitor letrozole compared with tamoxifen in the advanced setting and improvement in disease-free survival for the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole versus tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment may herald a major shift in standard first-line endocrine therapies for both advanced and early disease and ultimately chemoprevention of breast cancer. Other agents including newer SERMs and pure antiestrogens are undergoing phase III clinical trials and future endocrine and biological therapies are likely to include more selective and targeted therapies, which may be efficacious in both hormone-sensitive and receptor-negative disease.

The role of adjuvant therapy after liver resection for colorectal cancer metastases

Intrahepatic recurrence is common after major resection for colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases to the liver. In this review, the available data on different adjuvant therapies from systemic chemotherapy to regional approaches by direct perfusion of chemotherapeutic agents via the hepatic artery and portal vein will be discussed. Intraperitoneal administration of chemotherapy is another form of regional therapy. Novel approaches with immunotherapy and trials of neoadjuvant therapy in association with resection of CRC hepatic metastases have also been reported. The purpose of this review is to outline these various strategies and their role in combination with resection of CRC liver metastases. Although improved hepatic disease-free survival has been demonstrated with some strategies, overall survival is minimally affected and recurrence of metastatic disease at distant sites is still a major problem. Therefore, future directions should incorporate the use of new systemic agents effective against CRC metastases. Identification of subgroups through clinical features, molecular markers, proteins, or specific tumor properties may also help to individualize treatment.

The Role of Adjuvant Therapy After Liver Resection for Colorectal Metastases

No Abstract