Long-term follow-up of patients treated with paclitaxel/carboplatin-based chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: sequential phase II trials of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network

Epidemiology of treatment-associated mucosal injury after treatment with newer regimens for lymphoma, breast, lung, or colorectal cancer

GOALS OF WORK

Oral and gastrointestinal (GI) mucositis are frequent complications of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for cancer, contributing to not only the morbidity of treatment but its cost as well. The risk associated with specific chemotherapeutic agents, alone and in combination, has been characterized previously. In the current study, we sought to estimate the risk associated with newer regimens for the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and common solid tumors.

METHODS

We reviewed published studies reporting phase II and III clinical trials of dose-dense regimens for breast cancer and NHL, TAC (docetaxel, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy for breast cancer, and infusional 5-fluorouracil-based regimens for colorectal cancer. Platinum-, gemcitabine-, and taxane-based regimens for lung cancer, either alone or in combination with radiotherapy, were also considered. Using modified meta-analysis methods, we calculated quality-adjusted estimates of the risk for oral and GI mucositis by tumor type and regimen. Case reports are used to emphasize the relevance of the findings for patient care.

MAIN RESULTS

Our findings demonstrate that mucosal toxicity remains an important complication of cancer treatment. Moreover, innovations in drug combinations, scheduling, or mode of administration significantly modulate the risk for both oral and GI mucositis.

CONCLUSIONS

Ongoing review of the clinical trial experience will remain important as newer, targeted agents enter standard clinical practice.

Paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy combined with gefitinib (IRESSA) in patients with advanced breast cancer: a phase I/II study conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group

Paclitaxel (Taxol) and carboplatin are an effective combination regimen for treating advanced breast cancer. Gefitinib (IRESSA) is the first epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor to be approved for cancer treatment. This multicenter phase II trial treated 68 patients with advanced breast cancer with paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) over 3 h) and 3-weekly carboplatin (area under the curve of 6) for six cycles, and 250 mg/day gefitinib orally. Median age was 57 (range 35-77) years, patients had performance status 0 (69.1%), 1 (27.9%) 2 (2.9%), 82.4% of patients had visceral metastases and 63.2% had received adjuvant chemotherapy. Forty-eight (70.6%) patients completed six cycles of chemotherapy and 20 (29.4%) patients discontinued treatment (seven [10.3%] due to disease progression, seven [10.3%] due to toxicity, five [7.4%] withdrew consent and one [1.5%] died after the first cycle). Sixty-three (92.7%) patients were evaluable for response; nine (13.2%) had complete responses, 30 (44.1%) had partial responses, 21 (30.9%) had stable disease and three (4.4%) had disease progression. Grade 3/4 adverse events in > or =5% of patients except of alopecia, included neutropenia (17.7%), anemia (10.3%), diarrhea (7.4%), thrombocytopenia (5.9%) and peripheral neuropathy (5.9%). Of those tumor biopsies available for immunohistochemical analysis (n=60), 5.0% were positive and 35.0% negative for expression of all HER-family receptors. Comparable numbers of tumor biopsies were nuclear p27(kipl) positive and negative (39.7 and 42.7%, respectively), with the majority (72.1%) negative for cytoplasmic p27(kipl). The observed efficacy data in this study were similar to those reported for the combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin alone.

Sequential versus concurrent paclitaxel and carboplatin for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer in elderly patients and patients with poor performance status: results of two Phase II, multicenter trials

The primary objective of these trials was to determine the 1-year survival of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (ANSCLC) patients (> or =70 years with PS 0-2 or > or =18 years with PS 2) receiving sequential paclitaxel and carboplatin (P --> C) or concurrent P + C. The secondary objectives were assessment of toxicities and quality of life. A total of 121 patients with NSCLC were treated. P--> C patients received paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) weekly x 3, followed by 1 week of rest; these 4-week cycles were repeated until relapse. At relapse, patients received carboplatin (AUC = 5, IV) on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle until evidence of further progression or lack of improvement. P + C patients received paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (AUC = 2), weekly x 3, followed by 1 week of rest, until relapse. Patients in both studies were premedicated prior to paclitaxel administration. Sequential P + C resulted in a median survival of 8.2 months (range: <1-18.8) and P + C patients had a median survival of 9.2 months (range: <1-22.0). In both groups (P--> C) and P + C), the 1-year survival was 31%. For patients treated sequentially, treatment-related AEs (TRAE, > or =Grade 3) included fatigue (7%), neuropathy (5%), and leukopenia and diarrhea (3%, each). Grade 4 AEs were limited to neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and sepsis (1 episode each). For patients receiving concurrent P + C, TRAE included neutropenia and leukopenia (15%, each) and shortness of breath and bilateral bone pain (10%, each). Leukopenia (n = 2) and neutropenia (n = 1) were the only Grade 4 events reported. The analysis of quality of life (QOL) questionnaires indicated that there were no obvious differences between treatment groups during the study. These drugs and treatment schema were well-tolerated when administered in the community setting and resulted in survival rates that were similar to what is reported in the literature with combination therapy administered to "high risk" patients. Finding the optimal chemotherapy regimen, that can be tolerated, remains a challenge in elderly patients.

Chemotherapy in metastatic and locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The majority of patients with non-small cell lung cancer have locally advanced and metastatic disease at diagnosis. Combination platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard treatment for patients with advanced disease who have a performance status of 0-1. Chemotherapy is superior to supportive care alone in terms of survival, palliation of symptoms, and in many studies, improving quality of life. Newer third generation therapies such as paclitaxel, docetaxel, vinorelbine, and gemcitabine have been proven effective as single agents with minimal toxicity, compared with supportive care alone. In combination with platinum, these agents produce higher response rates than older platinum-based regimens, are associated with additional survival benefits, and are generally more convenient and less toxic for patients. Newer nonplatinum doublets appear equivalent to newer platinum-regimens and have expanded the options available for patients. Targeted agents are promising and may soon offer patients more effective and less toxic therapies. Progress in treatment in the advanced setting has led to advances in the care of locally advanced disease. Combination chemoradiotherapy is a standard treatment for locally advanced disease, and studies with newer agents are in progress.

Randomized, multinational, phase III study of docetaxel plus platinum combinations versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the TAX 326 study group

PURPOSE

To investigate whether docetaxel plus platinum regimens improve survival and affect quality of life (QoL) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared with vinorelbine plus cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients (n = 1,218) with stage IIIB to IV NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (DC); docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and carboplatin area under the curve of 6 mg/mL * min every 3 weeks (DCb); or vinorelbine 25 mg/m2/wk and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 every 4 weeks (VC).

RESULTS

Patients treated with DC had a median survival of 11.3 v 10.1 months for VC-treated patients (P =.044; hazard ratio, 1.183 [97.2% confidence interval, 0.989 to 1.416]). The 2-year survival rate was 21% for DC-treated patients and 14% for VC-treated patients. Overall response rate was 31.6% for DC-treated patients v 24.5% for VC-treated patients (P =.029). Median survival (9.4 v 9.9 months [for VC]; P =.657; hazard ratio, 1.048 [97.2 confidence interval, 0.877 to 1.253]) and response (23.9%) with DCb were similar to those results for VC. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, infection, and febrile neutropenia were similar with all three regimens. Grade 3 to 4 anemia, nausea, and vomiting were more common (P <.01) with VC than with DC or DCb. Patients treated with either docetaxel regimen had consistently improved QoL compared with VC-treated patients, who experienced deterioration in QoL.

CONCLUSION

DC resulted in a more favorable overall response and survival rate than VC. Both DC and DCb were better tolerated and provided patients with consistently improved QoL compared with VC. These findings demonstrate that a docetaxel plus platinum combination is an effective treatment option with a favorable therapeutic index for first-line treatment of advanced or metastatic NSCLC.