Phase II trial of carcinoembryonic antigen radioimmunotherapy with 131I-labetuzumab after salvage resection of colorectal metastases in the liver: five-year safety and efficacy results

Targeting CEACAM5-positive solid tumors using NILK-2401, a novel CEACAM5xCD47 κλ bispecific antibody

Background

Blocking the CD47 "don't eat me"-signal on tumor cells with monoclonal antibodies or fusion proteins has shown limited clinical activity in hematologic malignancies and solid tumors thus far. Main side effects are associated with non-tumor targeted binding to CD47 particularly on blood cells.

Methods

We present here the generation and preclinical development of NILK-2401, a CEACAM5×CD47 bispecific antibody (BsAb) composed of a common heavy chain and two different light chains, one kappa and one lambda, determining specificity (so-called κλ body format).

Results

NILK-2401 is a fully human BsAb binding the CEACAM5 N-terminal domain on tumor cells by its lambda light chain arm with an affinity of ≈4 nM and CD47 with its kappa chain arm with an intendedly low affinity of ≈500 nM to enabling tumor-specific blockade of the CD47-SIRPα interaction. For increased activity, NILK-2401 features a functional IgG1 Fc-part. NILK-2401 eliminates CEACAM5-positive tumor cell lines (3/3 colorectal, 2/2 gastric, 2/2 lung) with EC50 for antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity ranging from 0.38 to 25.84 nM and 0.04 to 0.25 nM, respectively. NILK-2401 binds neither CD47-positive/CEACAM5-negative cell lines nor primary epithelial cells. No erythrophagocytosis or platelet activation is observed. Quantification of the pre-existing NILK-2401-reactive T-cell repertoire in the blood of 14 healthy donors with diverse HLA molecules shows a low immunogenic potential. In vivo, NILK-2401 significantly delayed tumor growth in a NOD-SCID colon cancer model and a syngeneic mouse model using human CD47/human SIRPα transgenic mice and prolonged survival. In cynomolgus monkeys, single doses of 0.5 and 20 mg/kg were well tolerated; PK linked to anti-CD47 and Fc-binding seemed to be more than dose-proportional for Cmax and AUC0-inf. Data were validated in human FcRn TG32 mice. Combination of a CEACAM5-targeting T-cell engager (NILK-2301) with NILK-2401 can either boost NILK-2301 activity (Emax) up to 2.5-fold or allows reaching equal NILK-2301 activity at >600-fold (LS174T) to >3,000-fold (MKN-45) lower doses.

Conclusion

NILK-2401 combines promising preclinical activity with limited potential side effects due to the tumor-targeted blockade of CD47 and low immunogenicity and is planned to enter clinical testing.

Development and characterization of NILK-2301, a novel CEACAM5xCD3 κλ bispecific antibody for immunotherapy of CEACAM5-expressing cancers

BACKGROUND

T-cell retargeting to eliminate CEACAM5-expressing cancer cells via CEACAM5xCD3 bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) showed limited clinical activity so far, mostly due to insufficient T-cell activation, dose-limiting toxicities, and formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADA).

METHODS

We present here the generation and preclinical development of NILK-2301, a BsAb composed of a common heavy chain and two different light chains, one kappa and one lambda, determining specificity (so-called κλ body format).

RESULTS

NILK-2301 binds CD3ɛ on T-cells with its lambda light chain arm with an affinity of ≈100 nM, and the CEACAM5 A2 domain on tumor cells by its kappa light chain arm with an affinity of ≈5 nM. FcγR-binding is abrogated by the "LALAPA" mutation (Leu234Ala, Leu235Ala, Pro329Ala). NILK-2301 induced T-cell activation, proliferation, cytokine release, and T-cell dependent cellular cytotoxicity of CEACAM5-positive tumor cell lines (5/5 colorectal, 2/2 gastric, 2/2 lung), e.g., SK-CO-1 (Emax = 89%), MKN-45 (Emax = 84%), and H2122 (Emax = 97%), with EC50 ranging from 0.02 to 0.14 nM. NILK-2301 binds neither to CEACAM5-negative or primary colon epithelial cells nor to other CEACAM family members. NILK-2301 alone or in combination with checkpoint inhibition showed activity in organotypic tumor tissue slices and colorectal cancer organoid models. In vivo, NILK-2301 at 10 mg/kg significantly delayed tumor progression in colon- and a pancreatic adenocarcinoma model. Single-dose pharmacokinetics (PK) and tolerability in cynomolgus monkeys at 0.5 or 10 mg/kg intravenously or 20 mg subcutaneously showed dose-proportional PK, bioavailability ≈100%, and a projected half-life in humans of 13.1 days. NILK-2301 was well-tolerated. Data were confirmed in human FcRn TG32 mice.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, NILK-2301 combines promising preclinical activity and safety with lower probability of ADA-generation due to its format compared to other molecules and is scheduled to enter clinical testing at the end of 2023.

Radiolabeled Antibodies for Cancer Imaging and Therapy

Radioimmunoconjugates consist of a monoclonal antibody (mAb) linked to a radionuclide. Radioimmunoconjugates as theranostics tools have been in development with success, particularly in hematological malignancies, leading to approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) allows for reduced toxicity compared to conventional radiation therapy and enhances the efficacy of mAbs. In addition, using radiolabeled mAbs with imaging methods provides critical information on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of therapeutic agents with direct relevance to the optimization of the dose and dosing schedule, real-time antigen quantitation, antigen heterogeneity, and dynamic antigen changes. All of these parameters are critical in predicting treatment responses and identifying patients who are most likely to benefit from treatment. Historically, RITs have been less effective in solid tumors; however, several strategies are being investigated to improve their therapeutic index, including targeting patients with minimal disease burden; using pre-targeting strategies, newer radionuclides, and improved labeling techniques; and using combined modalities and locoregional application. This review provides an overview of the radiolabeled intact antibodies currently in clinical use and those in development.

Nanobodies Enhancing Cancer Visualization, Diagnosis and Therapeutics

Worldwide, cancer is a serious health concern due to the increasing rates of incidence and mortality. Conventional cancer imaging, diagnosis and treatment practices continue to substantially contribute to the fight against cancer. However, these practices do have some risks, adverse effects and limitations, which can affect patient outcomes. Although antibodies have been developed, successfully used and proven beneficial in various oncology practices, the use of antibodies also comes with certain challenges and limitations (large in size, poor tumor penetration, high immunogenicity and a long half-life). Therefore, it is vital to develop new ways to visualize, diagnose and treat cancer. Nanobodies are novel antigen-binding fragments that possess many advantageous properties (small in size, low immunogenicity and a short half-life). Thus, the use of nanobodies in cancer practices may overcome the challenges experienced with using traditional antibodies. In this review, we discuss (1) the challenges with antibody usage and the superior qualities of nanobodies; (2) the use of antibodies and nanobodies in cancer imaging, diagnosis, drug delivery and therapy (surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and immunotherapy); and (3) the potential improvements in oncology practices due to the use of nanobodies as compared to antibodies.

Combination radionuclide therapy: A new paradigm

Targeted molecular radionuclide therapy (MRT) has shown its potential for the treatment of cancers of multiple origins. A combination therapy strategy employing two or more distinct therapeutic approaches in cancer management is aimed at circumventing tumor resistance by simultaneously targeting compensatory signaling pathways or bypassing survival selection mutations acquired in response to individual monotherapies. Combination radionuclide therapy (CRT) is a newer application of the concept, utilizing a combination of radiolabeled molecular targeting agents with chemotherapy and beam radiation therapy for enhanced therapeutic index. Encouraging results are reported with chemotherapeutic agents in combination with radiolabeled targeting molecules for cancer therapy. With increasing awareness of the various survival and stress response pathways activated after radionuclide therapy, different holistic combinations of MRT agents with radiosensitizers targeting such pathways have also been explored. MRT has also been studied in combination with beam radiotherapy modalities such as external beam radiation therapy and carbon ion radiation therapy to enhance the anti-tumor response. Nanotechnology aids in CRT by bringing together multiple monotherapies on a single nanostructure platform for treating cancers in a more precise or personalized way. CRT will be a key player in managing cancers if correctly tailored to the individual patient profile. The success of CRT lies in an in-depth understanding of the radiobiological principles and pathways activated in response.

Perspectives on Immunotherapy of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer, especially liver metastasis, is still a challenge worldwide. Traditional treatment such as surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy have been difficult to be further advanced. We need to develop new treatment methods to further improve the poor prognosis of these patients. The emergence of immunotherapy has brought light to mCRC patients, especially those with dMMR. Based on several large trials, some drugs (pembrolizumab, nivolumab) have been approved by US Food and Drug Administration to treat the patients diagnosed with dMMR tumors. However, immunotherapy has reached a bottleneck for other MSS tumors, with low response rate and poor PFS and OS. Therefore, more clinical trials are underway toward mCRC patients, especially those with MSS. This review is intended to summarize the existing clinical trials to illustrate the development of immunotherapy in mCRC patients, and to provide a new thinking for the direction and experimental design of immunotherapy in the future.

Anti-tumour drugs of marine origin currently at various stages of clinical trials (review)

Oncological diseases for a long time have remained one of the most significant health problems of modern society, which causes great losses in its labour and vital potential. Contemporary oncology still faces unsolved issues as insufficient efficacy of treatment of progressing and metastatic cancer, chemoresistance, and side-effects of the traditional therapy which lead to disabilities among or death of a high number of patients. Development of new anti-tumour preparations with a broad range of pharmaceutical properties and low toxicity is becoming increasingly relevant every year. The objective of the study was to provide a review of the recent data about anti-tumour preparations of marine origin currently being at various phases of clinical trials in order to present the biological value of marine organisms – producers of cytotoxic compounds, and the perspectives of their use in modern biomedical technologies. Unlike the synthetic oncological preparations, natural compounds are safer, have broader range of cytotoxic activity, can inhibit the processes of tumour development and metastasis, and at the same time have effects on several etiopathogenic links of carcinogenesis. Currently, practical oncology uses 12 anti-tumour preparations of marine origin (Fludarabine, Cytarabine, Midostaurin, Nelarabine, Eribulin mesylate, Brentuximab vedotin, Trabectedin, Plitidepsin, Enfortumab vedotin, Polatuzumab vedotin, Belantamab mafodotin, Lurbinectedin), 27 substances are at different stages of clinical trials. Contemporary approaches to the treatment of oncological diseases are based on targeted methods such as immune and genetic therapies, antibody-drug conjugates, nanoparticles of biopolymers, and metals. All those methods employ bioactive compounds of marine origin. Numerous literature data from recent years indicate heightened attention to the marine pharmacology and the high potential of marine organisms for the biomedicinal and pharmaceutic industries.

Nanobodies in cancer

For treatment and diagnosis of cancer, antibodies have proven their value and now serve as a first line of therapy for certain cancers. A unique class of antibody fragments called nanobodies, derived from camelid heavy chain-only antibodies, are gaining increasing acceptance as diagnostic tools and are considered also as building blocks for chimeric antigen receptors as well as for targeted drug delivery. The small size of nanobodies (∼15 kDa), their stability, ease of manufacture and modification for diverse formats, short circulatory half-life, and high tissue penetration, coupled with excellent specificity and affinity, account for their attractiveness. Here we review applications of nanobodies in the sphere of tumor biology.

β-radiating radionuclides in cancer treatment, novel insight into promising approach

Targeted radionuclide therapy, known as molecular radiotherapy is a novel therapeutic module in cancer medicine. β-radiating radionuclides have definite impact on target cells via interference in cell cycle and particular signalings that can lead to tumor regression with minimal off-target effects on the surrounding tissues. Radionuclides play a remarkable role not only in apoptosis induction and cell cycle arrest, but also in the amelioration of other characteristics of cancer cells. Recently, application of novel β-radiating radionuclides in cancer therapy has been emerged as a promising therapeutic modality. Several investigations are ongoing to understand the underlying molecular mechanisms of β-radiating elements in cancer medicine. Based on the radiation dose, exposure time and type of the β-radiating element, different results could be achieved in cancer cells. It has been shown that β-radiating radioisotopes block cancer cell proliferation by inducing apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. However, physical characteristics of the β-radiating element (half-life, tissue penetration range, and maximum energy) and treatment protocol determine whether tumor cells undergo cell cycle arrest, apoptosis or both and to which extent. In this review, we highlighted novel therapeutic effects of β-radiating radionuclides on cancer cells, particularly apoptosis induction and cell cycle arrest.

ImmunoPET: Concept, Design, and Applications

Immuno-positron emission tomography (immunoPET) is a paradigm-shifting molecular imaging modality combining the superior targeting specificity of monoclonal antibody (mAb) and the inherent sensitivity of PET technique. A variety of radionuclides and mAbs have been exploited to develop immunoPET probes, which has been driven by the development and optimization of radiochemistry and conjugation strategies. In addition, tumor-targeting vectors with a short circulation time (e.g., Nanobody) or with an enhanced binding affinity (e.g., bispecific antibody) are being used to design novel immunoPET probes. Accordingly, several immunoPET probes, such as 89Zr-Df-pertuzumab and 89Zr-atezolizumab, have been successfully translated for clinical use. By noninvasively and dynamically revealing the expression of heterogeneous tumor antigens, immunoPET imaging is gradually changing the theranostic landscape of several types of malignancies. ImmunoPET is the method of choice for imaging specific tumor markers, immune cells, immune checkpoints, and inflammatory processes. Furthermore, the integration of immunoPET imaging in antibody drug development is of substantial significance because it provides pivotal information regarding antibody targeting abilities and distribution profiles. Herein, we present the latest immunoPET imaging strategies and their preclinical and clinical applications. We also emphasize current conjugation strategies that can be leveraged to develop next-generation immunoPET probes. Lastly, we discuss practical considerations to tune the development and translation of immunoPET imaging strategies.

Carcinoembryonic antigen-targeted photodynamic therapy in colorectal cancer models

BACKGROUND

In colorectal cancer, survival of patients is drastically reduced when complete resection is hampered by involvement of critical structures. Targeted photodynamic therapy (tPDT) is a local and targeted therapy which could play a role in eradicating residual tumor cells after incomplete resection. Since carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA; CEACAM5) is abundantly overexpressed in colorectal cancer, it is a potential target for tPDT of colorectal cancer.

METHODS

To address the potential of CEA-targeted PDT, we compared colorectal cancer cell lines with different CEA-expression levels (SW-48, SW-480, SW-620, SW-1222, WiDr, HT-29, DLD-1, LS174T, and LoVo) under identical experimental conditions. We evaluated the susceptibility to tPDT by varying radiant exposure and concentration of our antibody conjugate (DTPA-hMN-14-IRDye700DX). Finally, we assessed the efficacy of tPDT in vivo in 18 mice (BALB/cAnNRj-Foxn1nu/nu) with subcutaneously xenografted LoVo tumors.

RESULTS

In vitro, the treatment effect of tPDT varied per cell line and was dependent on both radiant exposure and antibody concentration. Under standardized conditions (94.5 J/cm2 and 0.5 μg/μL antibody conjugate concentration), the effect of tPDT was higher in cells with higher CEA availability: SW-1222, LS174T, LoVo, and SW-48 (22.8%, 52.8%, 49.9%, and 51.9% reduction of viable cells, respectively) compared to cells with lower CEA availability. Compared to control groups (light or antibody conjugate only), tumor growth rate was reduced in mice with s.c. LoVo tumors receiving tPDT.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest cells (and tumors) have different levels of susceptibility for tPDT even though they all express CEA. Furthermore, tPDT can effectively reduce tumor growth in vivo.

Phase I/II Trial of Anticarcinoembryonic Antigen Radioimmunotherapy, Gemcitabine, and Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Fluorodeoxyuridine Postresection of Liver Metastasis for Colorectal Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Report the feasibility, toxicities, and long-term results of a Phase I/II trial of ⁹⁰Y-labeled anticarcinoembryonic antigen (anti-CEA) (cT84.66) radioimmunotherapy (RIT), gemcitabine, and hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of fluorodeoxyuridine (FUdR) after maximal hepatic resection of metastatic colorectal cancer to the liver.

METHODS

Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer to the liver postresection or ablation to minimum disease were eligible. Each cohort received HAI of FUdR for 14 days on a dose escalation schedule. The maximum HAI FUdR dose level planned was 0.2 mg/kg/day, which is the standard dose for HAI FUdR alone. On day 9, ⁹⁰Y-cT84.66 anti-CEA at 16.6 mCi/m² as an i.v. bolus infusion and on days 9-11 i.v. gemcitabine at 105 mg/m² were given. Patients could receive up to three cycles every 6 weeks of protocol therapy. Four additional cycles of HAI FUdR were allowed after RIT.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were treated on this study. A maximum tolerated dose of 0.20 mg/kg/day of HAI FUdR combined with RIT at 16.6 mCi/m² and gemcitabine at 105 mg/m² was achieved with only 1 patient experiencing grade 3 reversible toxicity (mucositis). After surgery, 10 patients had no evidence of visible disease and remained without evidence of disease after completion of protocol therapy. The remaining 6 patients demonstrated radiological visible disease after surgery and after protocol therapy 2 patients had a CR, 1 patient had PR, 2 had stable disease, and 1 had progression. With a median follow-up of 41.8 months (18.7-114.6), median progression free survival was 9.6 months. Two patients demonstrated long-term disease control out to 45+ and 113+ months.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the safety, feasibility, and potential utility of HAI FUdR, RIT, and systemic gemcitabine. The trimodality approach does not have higher hematologic toxicities than seen in prior RIT-alone studies. Future efforts evaluating RIT in colorectal cancer should integrate RIT with systemic and regional therapies in the minimal tumor burden setting.

Immune therapy in colorectal cancer

The evidence that the immune system, when rightly stimulated, can eradicate cancer cells, combined with the latest knowledge about antitumor immunity, has led to recent progress in cancer immunotherapy. While infiltration of tumors with immune cells is described in advanced stage colorectal cancer (CRC), the first data concerning the clinical efficacy of immune-targeted therapies in CRC patients were disappointing. The evidence of tumor responses in CRC patients with microsatellite instability treated with immune checkpoint blockers has renewed the interest for research in the field of CRC immunotherapy. In this article, we briefly review the role of T lymphocytes infiltrating CRC tumors in order to introduce a brief history of CRC immunotherapy and then current trials involving immune-based strategies and particularly immune checkpoint blockers.

The Roles of Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Liver Metastasis and Therapeutic Approaches

Metastasis is a highly complicated and sequential process in which primary cancer spreads to secondary organic sites. Liver is a well-known metastatic organ from colorectal cancer. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is expressed in most gastrointestinal, breast, and lung cancer cells. Overexpression of CEA is closely associated with liver metastasis, which is the main cause of death from colorectal cancer. CEA is widely used as a diagnostic and prognostic tumor marker in cancer patients. It affects many steps of liver metastasis from colorectal cancer cells. CEA inhibits circulating cancer cell death. CEA also binds to heterogeneous nuclear RNA binding protein M4 (hnRNP M4), a Kupffer cell receptor protein, and activates Kupffer cells to secrete various cytokines that change the microenvironments for the survival of colorectal cancer cells in the liver. CEA also activates cell adhesion-related molecules. The close correlation between CEA and cancer has spurred the exploration of many CEA-targeted approaches as anticancer therapeutics. Understanding the detailed functions and mechanisms of CEA in liver metastasis will provide great opportunities for the improvement of anticancer approaches against colorectal cancers. In this report, the roles of CEA in liver metastasis and CEA-targeting anticancer modalities are reviewed.

α- Versus β-Emitting Radionuclides for Pretargeted Radioimmunotherapy of Carcinoembryonic Antigen-Expressing Human Colon Cancer Xenografts

Pretargeted radioimmunotherapy (PRIT) with the β-emitting radionuclide ¹⁷⁷Lu is an attractive approach to treat carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)-expressing tumors. The therapeutic efficacy of PRIT might be improved using α-emitting radionuclides such as ²¹³Bi. Herein, we report and compare the tumor-targeting properties and therapeutic efficacy of ²¹³Bi and ¹⁷⁷Lu for PRIT of CEA-expressing xenografts, using the bispecific monoclonal antibody TF2 (anti-CEA × anti-histamine-succinyl-glycine [HSG]) and the di-HSG-DOTA peptide IMP288. Methods: The in vitro binding characteristics of ²¹³Bi-IMP288 were compared with those of ¹⁷⁷Lu-IMP288. Tumor targeting of ²¹³Bi-IMP288 and ¹⁷⁷Lu-IMP288 was studied in mice bearing subcutaneous LS174T tumors that were pretargeted with TF2. Finally, the effect of ²¹³Bi-IMP288 (6, 12, or 17 MBq) and ¹⁷⁷Lu-IMP288 (60 MBq) on tumor growth and survival was assessed. Toxicity was determined by monitoring body weight, analyzing blood samples for hematologic and renal toxicity (hemoglobin, leukocytes, platelets, creatinine), and immunohistochemical analysis of the kidneys. Results: The in vitro binding characteristics of ²¹³Bi-IMP288 (dissociation constant, 0.45 ± 0.20 nM) to TF2-pretargeted LS174T cells were similar to those of ¹⁷⁷Lu-IMP288 (dissociation constant, 0.53 ± 0.12 nM). In vivo accumulation of ²¹³Bi-IMP288 in LS174T tumors was observed as early as 15 min after injection (9.2 ± 2.0 percentage injected dose [%ID]/g). ²¹³Bi-IMP288 cleared rapidly from the circulation; at 30 min after injection, the blood levels were 0.44 ± 0.28 %ID/g. Uptake in normal tissues was low, except for the kidneys, where uptake was 1.8 ± 1.1 %ID/g at 30 min after injection. The biodistribution of ²¹³Bi-IMP288 was comparable to that of ¹⁷⁷Lu-IMP288. Mice treated with a single dose of ²¹³Bi-IMP288 or ¹⁷⁷Lu-IMP288 showed significant inhibition of tumor growth. Median survival for the groups treated with phosphate-buffered saline, 6 MBq ²¹³Bi-IMP288, 12 MBq ²¹³Bi-IMP288, and 60 MBq ¹⁷⁷Lu-IMP288 was 22, 31, 45, and 42 d, respectively. Mice receiving 17 MBq ²¹³Bi-IMP288 showed significant weight loss, resulting in a median survival of only 24 d. No changes in hemoglobin, platelets, or leukocytes were observed in the treatment groups. However, immunohistochemical analysis of the kidneys of mice treated with 17 or 12 MBq ²¹³Bi-IMP288 showed signs of tubular damage, indicating nephrotoxicity. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this study shows for the first time that PRIT with TF2 and ²¹³Bi-IMP288 is feasible and at least as effective as ¹⁷⁷Lu-IMP288. However, at higher doses, kidney toxicity was observed. Future studies are warranted to determine the optimal dosing schedule to improve therapeutic efficacy while reducing renal toxicity.

Comparison between Three Promising ß-emitting Radionuclides, (67)Cu, (47)Sc and (161)Tb, with Emphasis on Doses Delivered to Minimal Residual Disease

PURPOSE: Radionuclide therapy is increasingly seen as a promising option to target minimal residual disease. Copper-67, scandium-47 and terbium-161 have a medium-energy β^- emission which is similar to that of lutetium-177, but offer the advantage of having diagnostic partner isotopes suitable for pretreatment imaging. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of ⁶⁷Cu, ⁴⁷Sc and ¹⁶¹Tb to irradiate small tumors.

METHODS: The absorbed dose deriving from a homogeneous distribution of ⁶⁷Cu, ⁴⁷Sc or ¹⁶¹Tb in water-density spheres was calculated with the Monte Carlo code CELLDOSE. The diameters of the spheres ranged from 5 mm to 10 µm, thus simulating micrometastases or single tumor cells. All electron emissions, including β^- spectra, Auger and conversion electrons were taken into account. Because these radionuclides differ in electron energy per decay, the simulations were run assuming that 1 MeV was released per µm³, which would result in a dose of 160 Gy if totally absorbed.

RESULTS: The absorbed dose was similar for the three radionuclides in the 5-mm sphere (146-149 Gy), but decreased differently in smaller spheres. In particular, ¹⁶¹Tb delivered higher doses compared to the other radionuclides. For instance, in the 100-µm sphere, the absorbed dose was 24.1 Gy with ⁶⁷Cu, 14.8 Gy with ⁴⁷Sc and 44.5 Gy with ¹⁶¹Tb. Auger and conversion electrons accounted for 71% of ¹⁶¹Tb dose. The largest dose differences were found in cell-sized spheres. In the 10-µm sphere, the dose delivered by ¹⁶¹Tb was 4.1 times higher than that from ⁶⁷Cu and 8.1 times that from ⁴⁷Sc.

CONCLUSION: ¹⁶¹Tb can effectively irradiate small tumors thanks to its decay spectrum that combines medium-energy β^- emission and low-energy conversion and Auger electrons. Therefore ¹⁶¹Tb might be a better candidate than ⁶⁷Cu and ⁴⁷Sc for treating minimal residual disease in a clinical setting.

Radioactive antibodies: a historical review of selective targeting and treatment of cancer

Radioactive antibodies have served as imaging and therapeutic agents for several decades, but recent developments raise enthusiasm that a new generation of cancer therapeutics and diverse molecular imaging agents for various cancers are more likely than ever before. This article traces the development of tumor-targeting antibodies labeled with diagnostic or therapeutic radionuclides, and describes the problems encountered and the clinical advances made. We also emphasize recent attempts to improve both molecular imaging and radioimmunotherapy with multistep pretargeting methods that separate the delivery of the tumor-binding, bispecific antibody given in the first step from the radionuclide carrier, which, in the second step, will localize to the "anti-carrier" binding arm of the pretargeted bispecific antibody.

Targeted Radionuclide Therapy of Human Tumors

Targeted radionuclide therapy is one of the most intensively developing directions of nuclear medicine. Unlike conventional external beam therapy, the targeted radionuclide therapy causes less collateral damage to normal tissues and allows targeted drug delivery to a clinically diagnosed neoplastic malformations, as well as metastasized cells and cellular clusters, thus providing systemic therapy of cancer. The methods of targeted radionuclide therapy are based on the use of molecular carriers of radionuclides with high affinity to antigens on the surface of tumor cells. The potential of targeted radionuclide therapy has markedly grown nowadays due to the expanded knowledge base in cancer biology, bioengineering, and radiochemistry. In this review, progress in the radionuclide therapy of hematological malignancies and approaches for treatment of solid tumors is addressed.

Antibody-mediated delivery of therapeutics for cancer therapy

INTRODUCTION

Antibody-conjugated therapies (ACTs) combine the specificity of monoclonal antibodies to target cancer cells directly with highly potent payloads, often resulting in superior efficacy and/or reduced toxicity. This represents a new approach to the treatment of cancer. There have been highly promising clinical trial results using this approach with improvements in linker and payload technology. The breadth of current trials examining ACTs in haematological malignancies and solid tumours indicate the potential for clinical impact.

AREAS COVERED

This review will provide an overview of ACTs currently in clinical development as well as the principles of antibody delivery and types of payloads used, including cytotoxic drugs, radiolabelled isotopes, nanoparticle-based siRNA particles and immunotoxins.

EXPERT OPINION

The focus of much of the clinical activity in ACTs has, understandably, been on their use as a monotherapy or in combination with standard of care drugs. This will continue, as will the search for better targets, linkers and payloads. Increasingly, as these drugs enter routine clinical care, important questions will arise regarding how to optimise ACT treatment approaches, including investigation of resistance mechanisms, biomarker and patient selection strategies, understanding of the unique toxicities of these drugs, and combinatorial approaches with standard therapies as well as emerging therapeutic agents like immunotherapy.

Pharmacokinetics and Dosimetry Studies for Optimization of Pretargeted Radioimmunotherapy in CEA-Expressing Advanced Lung Cancer Patients

Objectives

A phase I pretargeted radioimmunotherapy trial (EudractCT 200800603096) was designed in patients with metastatic lung cancer expressing carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) to optimize bispecific antibody and labeled peptide doses, as well as the delay between their injections.

Methods

Three cohorts of three patients received the anti-CEA × anti-histamine-succinyl-glycine (HSG)-humanized trivalent bispecific antibody (TF2) and the IMP288 bivalent HSG peptide. Patients underwent a pretherapeutic imaging session S1 (44 or 88 nmol/m² of TF2 followed by 4.4 nmol/m², 185 MBq, of ¹¹¹In-labeled IMP288) and, 1–2 weeks later, a therapy session S2 (240 or 480 nmol/m² of TF2 followed by 24 nmol/m², 1.1 GBq/m², of ¹⁷⁷Lu-labeled IMP288). The pretargeting delay was 24 or 48 h. The dose schedule was defined based on preclinical TF2 pharmacokinetic (PK) studies, on our previous clinical data using the previous anti-CEA-pretargeting system, and on clinical results observed in the first patients injected using the same system in Netherlands.

Results

TF2 PK was represented by a two-compartment model in which the central compartment volume (Vc) was linearly dependent on the patient’s surface area. PK was remarkably similar, with a clearance of 0.33 ± 0.03 L/h/m². ¹¹¹In- and ¹⁷⁷Lu-IMP288 PK was also well represented by a two-compartment model. IMP288 PK was faster (clearance 1.4–3.3 L/h). The Vc was proportional to body surface area, and IMP288 clearance depended on the molar ratio of injected IMP288 to circulating TF2 at the time of IMP288 injection. Modeling of image quantification confirmed the dependence of IMP288 kinetics on circulating TF2, but tumor activity PK was variable. Organ-absorbed doses were not significantly different in the three cohorts, but the tumor dose was significantly higher with the higher molar doses of TF2 (p < 0.002). S1 imaging predicted absorbed doses calculated in S2.

Conclusion

The best dosing parameters corresponded to the shorter pretargeting delay and to the highest TF2 molar doses. S1 imaging session accurately predicted PK as well as absorbed doses of S2, thus potentially allowing for patient selection and dose optimization.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01221675 (EudractCT 200800603096).

Therapeutic radionuclides in nuclear medicine: current and future prospects

The potential use of radionuclides in therapy has been recognized for many decades. A number of radionuclides, such as iodine-131 ((131)I), phosphorous-32 ((32)P), strontium-90 ((90)Sr), and yttrium-90 ((90)Y), have been used successfully for the treatment of many benign and malignant disorders. Recently, the rapid growth of this branch of nuclear medicine has been stimulated by the introduction of a number of new radionuclides and radiopharmaceuticals for the treatment of metastatic bone pain and neuroendocrine and other malignant or non-malignant tumours. Today, the field of radionuclide therapy is enjoying an exciting phase and is poised for greater growth and development in the coming years. For example, in Asia, the high prevalence of thyroid and liver diseases has prompted many novel developments and clinical trials using targeted radionuclide therapy. This paper reviews the characteristics and clinical applications of the commonly available therapeutic radionuclides, as well as the problems and issues involved in translating novel radionuclides into clinical therapies.

Radioimmunotherapy--a potential novel tool for pancreatic cancer therapy?

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most severe cancers and is predicted to rise up to the number two cancer killer by 2030. The ineffective treatment options available and that the cancer is silent until very late in its course are the main reasons for the poor outcome of the disease. Surgery is the only curative option but only available for 10-15 % of the patients, but even then many relapse due to metastases. Many new treatments are under way, and one of the promising ones is radioimmunotherapy (RIT). This review includes clinical trials with RIT in pancreatic cancer as well as a review of adverse events observed during treatment of other solid tumors. Additionally, preclinical studies are reviewed with emphasis on effect, adverse events, the tumor targeting as well as isotope function. Four clinical trials with pancreatic cancer have been conducted with positive results, and one phase III trial is underway. The use of RIT in patients with solid tumors has proven to be well tolerated, and the adverse effects are almost exclusively hematological. Multiple targets and isotopes have been evaluated preclinically, alone, or in combination with existing drug options. Smaller tumors have in several studies completely regressed, while larger ones have stabilized or progressed more slowly. Pancreatic cancer is one of the solid tumors where RIT have reached the longest. The tumor heterogeneity will most likely leave room for more than one treatment option, and several aspiring therapies are under way. RIT may become part of multimodality tumor-directed therapy for pancreatic cancer.

Tumor immunotargeting using innovative radionuclides

This paper reviews some aspects and recent developments in the use of antibodies to target radionuclides for tumor imaging and therapy. While radiolabeled antibodies have been considered for many years in this context, only a few have reached the level of routine clinical use. However, alternative radionuclides, with more appropriate physical properties, such as lutetium-177 or copper-67, as well as alpha-emitting radionuclides, including astatine-211, bismuth-213, actinium-225, and others are currently reviving hopes in cancer treatments, both in hematological diseases and solid tumors. At the same time, PET imaging, with short-lived radionuclides, such as gallium-68, fluorine-18 or copper-64, or long half-life ones, particularly iodine-124 and zirconium-89 now offers new perspectives in immuno-specific phenotype tumor imaging. New antibody analogues and pretargeting strategies have also considerably improved the performances of tumor immunotargeting and completely renewed the interest in these approaches for imaging and therapy by providing theranostics, companion diagnostics and news tools to make personalized medicine a reality.

Radiolabeled nanobodies as theranostic tools in targeted radionuclide therapy of cancer

INTRODUCTION

The integration of diagnostic testing for the presence of a molecular target is of interest to predict successful targeted radionuclide therapy (TRNT). This so-called 'theranostic' approach aims to improve personalized treatment based on the molecular characteristics of cancer cells. Moreover, it offers new insights in predicting adverse effects and provides appropriate tools to monitor therapy responses. Recent findings using nanobodies emphasize their potential as theranostic tools in cancer treatment. Nanobodies are recombinant, small antigen-binding fragments that are derived from camelid heavy-chain-only antibodies.

AREAS COVERED

We review the current status of theranostic approaches in TRNT, with a focus on antibodies, peptides, scaffold proteins and emerging nanobodies. In recent years, nanobodies have been evaluated intensively for molecular imaging. In addition, novel data on TRNT using radiolabeled nanobodies for carcinomas and multiple myeloma highlight their promising opportunities in cancer treatment.

EXPERT OPINION

We trust that radiolabeled nanobodies will have a future potential as theranostic tools in cancer therapy, both for diagnosis as well as for TRNT.

Radioimmunotherapy: a specific treatment protocol for cancer by cytotoxic radioisotopes conjugated to antibodies

Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) represents a selective internal radiation therapy, that is, the use of radionuclides conjugated to tumor-directed monoclonal antibodies (including those fragments) or peptides. In a clinical field, two successful examples of this treatment protocol are currently extended by ⁹⁰Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin) and ¹³¹I-tositumomab (Bexxar), both of which are anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies coupled to cytotoxic radioisotopes and are approved for the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients. In addition, some beneficial observations are obtained in preclinical studies targeting solid tumors. To date, in order to reduce the unnecessary exposure and to enhance the therapeutic efficacy, various biological, chemical, and treatment procedural improvements have been investigated in RIT. This review outlines the fundamentals of RIT and current knowledge of the preclinical/clinical trials for cancer treatment.

Radioimmunoconjugates for the treatment of cancer

Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) has been developed for more than 30 years. Two products targeting the CD20 antigen are approved in the treatment of non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma (NHBL): iodine 131-tositumomab and yttrium 90-ibritumomab tiuxetan. RIT can be integrated in clinical practice for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) or as consolidation after induction chemotherapy. High-dose treatment, RIT in first-line treatment, fractionated RIT, and use of new humanized monoclonal antibodies (MAbs), in particular targeting CD22, showed promising results in NHBL. In other hemopathies, such as multiple myeloma, efficacy has been demonstrated in preclinical studies. In solid tumors, more resistant to radiation and less accessible to large molecules such as MAbs, clinical efficacy remains limited. However, pretargeting methods have shown clinical efficacy. Finally, new beta emitters such as lutetium 177, with better physical properties will further improve the safety of RIT and alpha emitters, such as bismuth 213 or astatine 211, offer the theoretical possibility to eradicate the last microscopic clusters of tumor cells, in the consolidation setting. Personalized treatments, based on quantitative positron emission tomography (PET), pre-therapeutic imaging, and dosimetry procedures, also could be applied to adapt injected activity to each patient.

General overview of radioimmunotherapy of solid tumors

Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) represents an attractive tool for the treatment of local and/or diffuse tumors with radiation. In RIT, cytotoxic radionuclides are delivered by monoclonal antibodies that specifically target tumor-associated antigens or the tumor microenvironment. While RIT has been successfully employed for the treatment of lymphoma, mostly with radiolabeled antibodies against CD20 (Bexxar(®); Corixa Corp., WA, USA and Zevalin(®); Biogen Idec Inc., CA, USA and Schering AG, Berlin, Germany), its use in solid tumors is more challenging and, so far, few trials have progressed beyond Phase II. This review provides an update on antibody-radionuclide conjugates and their use in RIT. It also discusses possible optimization strategies to improve the clinical response by considering biological, radiobiological and physical features.

Development of an imaging-guided CEA-pretargeted radionuclide treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: first clinical results

Background:

Radiolabelled antibody targeting of cancer is limited by slow blood clearance. Pretargeting with a non-radiolabelled bispecific monoclonal antibody (bsMAb) followed by a rapidly clearing radiolabelled hapten peptide improves tumour localisation. The primary goals of this first pretargeting study in patients with the anti-CEACAM5 × anti-hapten (HSG) bsMAb, TF2, and the radiolabelled hapten-peptide, IMP288, were to assess optimal pretargeting conditions and safety in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC).

Methods:

Different dose schedules were studied in four cohorts of five patients: (1) shortening the interval between the bsMAb and peptide administration (5 days vs 1 day), (2) escalating the TF2 dose (from 75 to 150 mg), and (3) reducing the peptide dose (from 100 to 25 μg). After confirmation of tumour targeting by ¹¹¹In-IMP288, patients were treated with a bsMAb/¹⁷⁷Lu-IMP288 cycle.

Results:

Rapid and selective tumour targeting of the radiolabelled peptide was visualised within 1 h, with high tumour-to-tissue ratios (>20 at 24 h). Improved tumour targeting was achieved with a 1-day interval between the administration of the bsMAb and the peptide and with the 25-μg peptide dose. High ¹⁷⁷Lu-IMP288 doses (2.5–7.4 GBq) were well tolerated, with some manageable TF2 infusion reactions, and transient grades 3–4 thrombocytopaenia in 10% of the patients who received ¹⁷⁷Lu-IMP288.

Conclusion:

This phase I study demonstrates for the first time that pretargeting with bsMAb TF2 and radiolabelled IMP288 in patients with CEA-expressing CRC is feasible and safe. With this pretargeting method, tumours are specifically and rapidly targeted.

Emerging trends for radioimmunotherapy in solid tumors

Due to its ability to target both known and occult lesions, radioimmunotherapy (RIT) is an attractive therapeutic modality for solid tumors. Poor tumor uptake and undesirable pharmacokinetics, however, have precluded the administration of radioimmunoconjugates at therapeutically relevant doses thereby limiting the clinical utility of RIT. In solid tumors, efficacy of RIT is further compromised by heterogeneities in blood flow, tumor stroma, expression of target antigens and radioresistance. As a result significant efforts have been invested toward developing strategies to overcome these impediments. Further, there is an emerging interest in exploiting short-range, high energy α-particle emitting radionuclides for the eradication of minimal residual and micrometastatic disease. As a result several modalities for localized therapy and models of minimal disease have been developed for preclinical evaluation. This review provides a brief update on the recent efforts toward improving the efficacy of RIT for solid tumors, and development of RIT strategies for minimal disease associated with solid tumors. Further, some of promising approaches to improve tumor targeting, which showed promise in the past, but have now been ignored are also discussed.

Improvement of radioimmunotherapy using pretargeting

During the past two decades, considerable research has been devoted to radionuclide therapy using radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies and receptor binding agents. Conventional radioimmunotherapy (RIT) is now an established and important tool in the treatment of hematologic malignancies such as Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. For solid malignancies, the efficacy of RIT has not been as successful due to lower radiosensitivity, difficult penetration of the antibody into the tumor, and potential excessive radiation to normal tissues. Innovative approaches have been developed in order to enhance tumor absorbed dose while limiting toxicity to overcome the different limitations due to the tumor and host characteristics. Pretargeting techniques (pRIT) are a promising approach that consists of decoupling the delivery of a tumor monoclonal antibody (mAb) from the delivery of the radionuclide. This results in a much higher tumor-to-normal tissue ratio and is favorable for therapy as well and imaging. This includes various strategies based on avidin/streptavidin-biotin, DNA-complementary DNA, and bispecific antibody-hapten bindings. pRIT continuously evolves with the investigation of new molecular constructs and the development of radiochemistry. Pharmacokinetics improve dosimetry depending on the radionuclides used (alpha, beta, and Auger emitters) with prediction of tumor response and host toxicities. New constructs such as the Dock and Lock technology allow production of a variety of mABs directed against tumor-associated antigens. Survival benefit has already been shown in medullary thyroid carcinoma. Improvement in delivery of radioactivity to tumors with these pretargeting procedures associated with reduced hematologic toxicity will become the next generation of RIT. The following review addresses actual technical and clinical considerations and future development of pRIT.

Survival after liver resection in metastatic colorectal cancer: review and meta-analysis of prognostic factors

Background

Hepatic metastases develop in approximately 50% of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases. We performed a review and meta-analysis to evaluate survival after resection of CRC liver metastases (CLMs) and estimated the summary effect for seven prognostic factors.

Methods

Studies published between 1999 and 2010, indexed on Medline, that reported survival after resection of CLMs, were reviewed. Meta-relative risks for survival by prognostic factor were calculated, stratified by study size and annual clinic volume. Cumulative meta-analysis results by annual clinic volume were plotted.

Results

Five- and 10-year survival ranged from 16% to 74% (median 38%) and 9% to 69% (median 26%), respectively, based on 60 studies. The overall summary median survival time was 3.6 (range: 1.7–7.3) years. Meta-relative risks (95% confidence intervals) by prognostic factor were: node positive primary, 1.6 (1.5–1.7); carcinoembryonic antigen level, 1.9 (1.1–3.2); extrahepatic disease, 1.9 (1.5–2.4); poor tumor grade, 1.9 (1.3–2.7); positive margin, 2.0 (1.7–2.5); >1 liver metastases, 1.6 (1.4–1.8); and >3 cm tumor diameter, 1.5 (1.3–1.8). Cumulative meta-analyses by annual clinic volume suggested improved survival with increasing volume.

Conclusion

The overall median survival following CLM liver resection was 3.6 years. All seven investigated prognostic factors showed a modest but significant predictive relationship with survival, and certain prognostic factors may prove useful in determining optimal therapeutic options. Due to the increasing complexity of surgical interventions for CLM and the inclusion of patients with higher disease burdens, future studies should consider the potential for selection and referral bias on survival.

Enhanced efficacy of combined 213Bi-DTPA-F3 and paclitaxel therapy of peritoneal carcinomatosis is mediated by enhanced induction of apoptosis and G2/M phase arrest

PURPOSE

Targeted therapy with α-particle emitting radionuclides is a promising new option in cancer therapy. Stable conjugates of the vascular tumour-homing peptide F3 with the α-emitter (213)Bi specifically target tumour cells. The aim of our study was to determine efficacy of combined (213)Bi-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA)-F3 and paclitaxel treatment compared to treatment with either (213)Bi-DTPA-F3 or paclitaxel both in vitro and in vivo.

METHODS

Cytotoxicity of treatment with (213)Bi-DTPA-F3 and paclitaxel, alone or in combination, was assayed towards OVCAR-3 cells using the alamarBlue assay, the clonogenic assay and flow cytometric analyses of the mode of cell death and cell cycle arrest. Therapeutic efficacy of the different treatment options was assayed after repeated treatment of mice bearing intraperitoneal OVCAR-3 xenograft tumours. Therapy monitoring was performed by bioluminescence imaging and histopathologic analysis.

RESULTS

Treatment of OVCAR-3 cells in vitro with combined (213)Bi-DTPA-F3 and paclitaxel resulted in enhanced cytotoxicity, induction of apoptosis and G2/M phase arrest compared to treatment with either (213)Bi-DTPA-F3 or paclitaxel. Accordingly, i.p. xenograft OVCAR-3 tumours showed the best response following repeated (six times) combined therapy with (213)Bi-DTPA-F3 (1.85 MBq) and paclitaxel (120 μg) as demonstrated by bioluminescence imaging and histopathologic investigation of tumour spread on the mesentery of the small and large intestine. Moreover, mean survival of xenograft mice that received combined therapy with (213)Bi-DTPA-F3 and paclitaxel was significantly superior to mice treated with either (213)Bi-DTPA-F3 or paclitaxel alone.

CONCLUSION

Combined treatment with (213)Bi-DTPA-F3 and paclitaxel significantly increased mean survival of mice with peritoneal carcinomatosis of ovarian origin, thus favouring future therapeutic application.

Using antibodies to target cancer therapeutics

INTRODUCTION

Over a half a century ago, radiolabeled antibodies were shown to localize selectively in tissues based on the expression of unique antigens. Antibodies have since become the de facto targeting agent, even inspiring the development of non-antibody compounds for targeting purposes.

AREAS COVERED

In this article, we review various aspects of how antibodies are transforming the way cancer is being detected and treated, with the growing demand for unconjugated and many new antibody conjugates. While unconjugated antibodies continue to garner most of the attention, interest in new antibody drug conjugates and immunotoxins has expanded over the past few years. However, there continues to be active research with new radioimmunoconjugates for imaging and therapy, particularly with α-emitters, as well as antibody-targeted cytokines and other biological response modifiers.

EXPERT OPINION

The increasing number of new agents being developed and tested clinically suggests that antibody-targeted compounds will have an expanding role in the future.

Cancer radioimmunotherapy

Targeting of radionuclides with antibodies, or radioimmunotherapy, has been an active field of research spanning nearly 50 years, evolving with advancing technologies in molecular biology and chemistry, and with many important preclinical and clinical studies illustrating the benefits, but also the challenges, which all forms of targeted therapies face. There are currently two radiolabeled antibodies approved for the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, but radioimmunotherapy of solid tumors remains a challenge. Novel antibody constructs, focusing on treatment of localized and minimal disease, and pretargeting are all promising new approaches that are currently under investigation.

Dosimetry results suggest feasibility of radioimmunotherapy using anti-CD138 (B-B4) antibody in multiple myeloma patients

Syndecan-1 (CD138), a heparan sulfate proteoglycan, is constantly expressed on tumor cells in multiple myeloma (MM). This surface antigen is an attractive candidate for targeted therapy, especially radioimmunotherapy (RAIT). We report preliminary biodistribution and dosimetry results obtained in refractory MM patients in a phase I/II RAIT study using iodine-131-labeled anti-CD138 (B-B4) monoclonal antibody (mAb). Four patients with progressive disease were enrolled after three lines of therapy. They received 370 MBq (20 mg/m(2)) of (131)I-B-B4 for the dosimetry study. Each patient underwent a whole body (WB) CT and four WB emission scans at days D0, D1, and D3-4. Images were corrected for attenuation and scatter to assess doses absorbed by organs and bone marrow (BM). Blood and urine samples were additionally collected. Dosimetry was conducted using the MIRD method. Images obtained 1 h after (131)I-B-B4 injection showed high BM and liver uptake without kidney uptake. The BM uptake confirmed BM involvement as detected by pre-inclusion FDG PET/CT. Absorbed doses were calculated at 2.03 ± 0.3 mGy/MBq for the liver, 1.10 ± 0.9 mGy/MBq for the kidneys, and 0.52 ± 0.20 mGy/MBq for the BM. Grade III thrombocytopenia was documented in two cases (highest BM-absorbed doses), and no grade IV hematological toxicity was observed. Therefore, autologous stem cells were not infused. One patient out of four experienced partial response, with 60% reduction of M-spike on serum electrophoresis, and total relief of pain, lasting for 1 year. This patient was able to go back to work. In this proof of concept study based on dosimetry, we show that MM RAIT is feasible using the anti-CD138 antibody. It would be of great interest to perform a RAIT phase I/II trial with a humanized anti-CD138 mAb with increased doses and systematic autologous stem cell infusions to overcome hematological toxicity and achieve efficacy.

Clinical radioimmunotherapy--the role of radiobiology

Conventional external-beam radiation therapy is dedicated to the treatment of localized disease, whereas radioimmunotherapy represents an innovative tool for the treatment of local or diffuse tumors. Radioimmunotherapy involves the administration of radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies that are directed specifically against tumor-associated antigens or against the tumor microenvironment. Although many tumor-associated antigens have been identified as possible targets for radioimmunotherapy of patients with hematological or solid tumors, clinical success has so far been achieved mostly with radiolabeled antibodies against CD20 ((131)I-tositumomab and (90)Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan) for the treatment of lymphoma. In this Review, we provide an update on the current challenges aimed to improve the efficacy of radioimmunotherapy and discuss the main radiobiological issues associated with clinical radioimmunotherapy.

Molecular imaging with SPECT as a tool for drug development

Molecular imaging techniques are increasingly being used as valuable tools in the drug development process. Radionuclide-based imaging modalities such as single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) have proven to be useful in phases ranging from preclinical development to the initial stages of clinical testing. The high sensitivity of these imaging modalities makes them particularly suited for exploratory investigational new drug (IND) studies as they have the potential to characterize in vivo pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of the compounds using only a fraction of the intended therapeutic dose (microdosing). This information obtained at an early stage of clinical testing results in a better selection among promising drug candidates, thereby increasing the success rate of agents entering clinical trials and the overall efficiency of the process. In this article, we will review the potential applications of SPECT imaging in the drug development process with an emphasis on its applications in exploratory IND studies.

Adjuvant radioimmunotherapy improves survival of rats after resection of colorectal liver metastases

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that adjuvant radioimmunotherapy (RIT) prevents recurrent liver metastases and/or results in improved survival after tumorectomy in an experimental model.

BACKGROUND

Although partial hepatectomy can improve 5-year survival of patients with colorectal liver metastases up to 58%, recurrent tumor growth in the liver occurs frequently. Radioimmunotherapy using radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies directed against tumor-associated antigens is considered most suited for treating minimal residual disease and could therefore serve as an adjuvant after surgery.

METHODS

Liver metastases were induced in male Wag/Rij rats by a mini-laparotomy with intrahepatic injection of 0.3 × 106 CC531 tumor cells. The biodistribution of the radiolabeled monoclonal antibody MG1, directed against a 80-kDa cell surface antigen on CC531 tumors, in this model was determined at 1, 3, and 7 days after intravenous administration. The therapeutic efficacy of 177Lu-MG1 was compared with that of a sham antibody (UPC10), labeled with the same activity dose of Lu-177, and saline only. Radioimmunotherapy was administered either at the day of the tumorectomy (day 14 after tumor cell inoculation) or 7 days later. Primary endpoint was survival.

RESULTS

Radiolabeled MG1 preferentially accumulated in tumor lesions in the liver reaching a maximum 3 days postinjection (8.7 ± 0.6% injected dose per gram). Both the administration of 177Lu-MG1 and 177Lu-UPC10 resulted in a transient decrease in body weight. No other signs of clinical discomfort were registered. The survival curves of the group that received 177Lu-UPC10 and the group that received saline only did not differ (P=0.886). Administration of RIT immediately after surgery improved survival compared to administration of the control antibody (hazard ratio [HR], 1.54; P = 0.051), which was even more pronounced when survival was adjusted for the weight of the resected tumor (HR, 1.71; P = 0.027). A therapeutic efficacy of delayed treatment seemed likely (HR, 2.34; P = 0.055). Survival after early administration did not differ from delayed administration (HR, 1.16; P = 0.763).

CONCLUSION

This study provides proof of principle that RIT can be an effective adjuvant treatment modality after surgical treatment of colorectal liver metastases.

The intraportal injection model for liver metastasis: advantages of associated bioluminescence to assess tumor growth and influences on tumor uptake of radiolabeled anti-carcinoembryonic antigen antibody

BACKGROUND

Radioimmunotherapy is emerging as a new tool for adjuvant therapy of colorectal cancer. The liver remains the main site for metastases, carrying a high mortality rate. Many animal models are available but none associates easy, reliable implantation and in-vivo follow-up for experimental therapeutic studies. The aims of this study were to develop a reliable hepatic metastatic colonic cancer model in mice using the intraportal route for injection, with follow-up by bioluminescence (BLI) and to evaluate the impact of tumor location on tumor antigen direct targeting using radiolabeled anti-CEA (carcinoembryonic antigen) antibodies.

METHODS

Ls-174T Luc+ is a colon carcinoma cell line strongly expressing CEA, transfected with the luciferase gene for BLI. Isolated or aggregated cells (1×10(6)) were injected through the portal vein. The tumor burden was investigated using BLI to assess hepatic implantation and growth kinetics. The biodistribution of the 125I anti-CEA antibody fragment (F6) was studied in this model and was compared with subcutaneous implantation.

RESULTS

The tumor implantation rate was 100% using aggregated cells compared with 26.6% of isolated cells. Photons emitted by 1×10(6) cells were detected by BLI immediately after injection and allowed visual confirmation of hepatic distribution. The tumor growth was assessed over time to select homogeneous groups of animals. Radiolabeled anti-CEA antibody biodistributions showed a significantly higher uptake in hepatic than in subcutaneous tumors.

CONCLUSION

The association of hepatic tumor graft through the portal route and BLI provides a reliable animal model and permits sensitive in-vivo detection and follow-up of hepatic metastases. The hepatic model seems to more closely reproduce colon cancer metastases compared with subcutaneous metastasis. The hepatic model is of particular interest for studying radioimmunotherapy.

Novel Carcinoembryonic-Antigen-(CEA)-Specific Pretargeting System to Assess Tumor Cell Viability after Irradiation of Colorectal Cancer Cells

PURPOSE

To date, no valid imaging modality exists for early response prediction to neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in carcinoembryonic-antigen-(CEA)-expressing rectal cancers (UICC stages II and III). It is hypothesized that the uptake of an anti-CEA antibody is directly related to the number of viable tumor cells and may be quantified by immuno-positron emission tomography (immuno-PET). Therefore, we evaluated a novel pretargeting system using TF2, a humanized bispecific trivalent monoclonal antibody (mAb), directed against CEA and the IMP-288-peptide, a hapten for binding radiometals for imaging. Uptake and kinetics of the pretargeting system were investigated in vitro prior to and after irradiation.

METHODS

TF2 was labeled with ¹³¹I and IMP-288 with ¹¹¹InCl₃. The colorectal cancer cell lines HT29, SW480, and T84 with known varying CEA expression were incubated (≤ 72 hours) with ¹³¹I-TF2 or the TF2-¹¹¹In-IMP-288 pretargeting system. Parallel cultures were irradiated with 2-10 Gy high-energy photons. Tracer uptake, proliferation, apoptosis, and CEA-RNA expression of cancer cells were investigated.

RESULTS

The uptake of tracers was dependent on CEA expression and cell count of the cell lines (uptake/10⁶ cells: 0.3% in HT29, 1.5% in SW480, and 14% in T84, p < 0.001). The TF2-¹¹¹In-IMP-288 pretargeting system showed a higher uptake after 4 and 72 hours compared to (131)I-TF2 in parallel cultures. Only in one cell line (SW480) an increased apoptosis after irradiation could be detected. Irradiation increased dose dependently both the specific uptake of ¹³¹I-TF2 and of the TF2-¹¹¹In-IMP-288 system (4-fold in HT29 and T84 after 10 Gy (72 hours), p < 0.001). These results were CEA-mRNA independent.

CONCLUSION

This novel pretargeting system allows the quantitative analysis of CEA-expressing colorectal cancer cells and represents a promising tool for evaluation of tumor cell viability after irradiation.

Adjuvant radioimmunotherapy after radiofrequency ablation of colorectal liver metastases in an experimental model

PURPOSE

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has shown to improve survival in patients not eligible for surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases. However, recurrences after RFA are a major problem. Adjuvant radioimmunotherapy (RIT) after surgical resection of liver metastases has shown to improve survival. The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that adjuvant RIT might be an effective way to prevent recurrent liver metastases after RFA in an experimental model.

METHODS

Tumours in the liver were induced by intrahepatic injection of 300,000 CC531 cells in male Wag/Rij rats (n = 60). Ten days later, the intrahepatic tumours were treated with RFA. Adjuvant RIT ((177)Lu-labelled monoclonal antibody MG1 at 300 MBq/kg) was administered intravenously either at the day of RFA (day 10) or 7 days later. Control rats received no treatment. Primary endpoint was survival.

RESULTS

Administration of (177)Lu-MG1 resulted in a transient decrease in body weight, compared to no adjuvant treatment. However, no other signs of clinical discomfort were registered. Log rank test showed that the survival curves of the groups treated with RIT, either at day 10 or day 17, did not differ significantly from the survival curve of the rats that did not receive adjuvant treatment (P = 0.902).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that adjuvant RIT does not increase survival after RFA of colorectal liver metastases in rats.