Targeting leukemia stem cells: The new goal of therapy in adult acute myeloid leukemia

The most popular view of hematopoietic cell lineage organization is that of complex reactive or adaptative systems. Leukemia contains a subpopulation of cells that display characteristics of stem cells. These cells maintain tumor growth. The properties of leukemia stem cells indicate that current conventional chemotherapy, directed against the bulk of the tumor, will not be effective. Leukemia stem cells are quiescent and do not respond to cell cycle-specific cytotoxic agents used to treat leukemia and thus contribute to treatment failure. New strategies are required that specifically target this malignant stem cell population.

Expanding therapeutic options in mantle cell lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) still carries a poor prognosis. Chemoimmunotherapy (combination with rituximab) is the routine first-line therapy, although data strongly suggest a benefit from intensification through high-dose therapy with stem cell transplantation consolidation or dose-intense chemotherapy with HyperCVAD (fractionated cyclophosphamide/vincristine/doxorubicin/dexamethasone)/rituximab. Unfortunately, most patients still experience relapse, and a multitude of novel agents are currently being tested in this setting, including proteasome inhibitors with bortezomib (the first of its class and first Food and Drug Administration-approved drug in MCL), mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, Bcl-2 inhibitors, and antiangiogenesis agents, among others. Because of the relative rarity of the disease-MCL represents 6% of non-Hodgkin lymphoma-an obvious effort is needed to enroll patients on clinical trials. Not surprisingly, as in other non-Hodgkin lymphomas, MCL appears more and more as a heterogeneous disease, which might impact future clinical trial design through pharmacogenomics and hopefully help us develop smaller "molecular" relevant trials.

The biology behind mTOR inhibition in sarcoma

Dysregulation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway has been found in many human tumors and implicated in the promotion of cancer cell growth and survival. Hence, the mTOR pathway is considered an important target for anticancer drug development. Currently, the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin and its derivatives CCI-779, RAD001, and AP23573 are being evaluated in cancer clinical trials. To date, clinical results have shown good tolerability of treatment with mTOR inhibitors in most reports and varying effectiveness of mTOR inhibitors in a variety of tumors in a subset of patients. For the targeted treatment of sarcomas, AP23573 has shown promising clinical efficacy and low toxicity profiles in patients. Further studies should define the optimal dose/schedule, patient selection, and combination strategies with other biological agents, especially those targeting signaling pathways crucial for cell survival. Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.

Mantle cell lymphoma: Evolving novel options

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) represents only 6% of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma but is one of the most active fields of clinical investigation. Front-line therapy appears to benefit from intensification either through high-dose therapy with stem cell transplant consolidation or dose-intense chemotherapy with hyper-CVAD (fractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone) and rituximab. Unfortunately, no standard therapy has been defined, and most patients eventually relapse. An impressive number of novel agents are currently being tested, the bulk of which are biologic agents or targeted therapies. Bortezomib is the first in class of proteasome inhibitors and the first new agent to be approved in relapsed/refractory MCL. Other small molecules have shown encouraging activity, including mTOR and Bcl-2 inhibitors, novel antibodies, and new cytotoxic agents. Future trials will also benefit from new molecular approaches through pharmacogenomics.

Targeting Treatment in AML

Currently available chemotherapy has probably reached the limits of its potential in treating acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In considering the next steps it is appropriate to exploit on the one hand knowledge of the molecular, immunophenotypic and biological characteristics of the disease and on the other the biology of the patient. The aim is to move towards a more targeted approach.

Immunophenotyping has defined an adequate target (CD33) for antibody-directed treatment, although this is not leukemia specific. Monotherapy has produced important response rates in relapsed disease but it is unlikely to displace conventional chemotherapy. Several randomized trials of antibody directed chemotherapy in combination with chemotherapy nearing completion will establish the usefulness of this approach. In most patients a leukemia-specific immunophenotype can be characterized that can be used to monitor treatment. Minimal residual disease (MRD) detection in morphological remission can detect patients at high risk of relapse, as can a limited number of molecular markers. The clinical value of intervening at the time of MRD detection is not clear. Among the increasing molecular abnormalities described in AML, FLT-3 mutations appear the most attractive for therapeutic intervention. Several phase 2 studies have shown limited efficacy, and randomized trials in combination are underway. Other mechanisms that can be specifically targeted include farnesylation, methylation status, and histone deacelylation. Newer knowledge about the immunophenotypic and biological characteristics of the leukemic stem cell population has opened opportunities to develop treatments that exploit characteristics of the leukemic stem cells that differ from the normal stem cell. Some of these initiatives are now discussed.

New Directions in the Treatment of Mantle Cell Lymphoma: An Overview

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is one of the most challenging lymphomas to treat. In the first-line setting, high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation or hyperCVAD/rituximab suggest benefit, especially in patients aged < 60 years. Nucleoside analogue-based regimens represent an alternate option in patients ineligible for HDT. Fludarabine in combination with cyclophosphamide or mitoxantrone has shown activity, and the results were superior with the addition of rituximab. Other cytotoxic agents, such as cladribine, clofarabine, or bendamustin, showed promising activity as well. A variety of new monoclonal antibody (MoAb) agents, such as humanized anti-CD20, alemtuzumab, anti-HLA-DR, anti-CD22 (as an immunotoxin carrier), anti-CD40, as well as MoAb-targeting TRAIL-R1 and TRAIL-R2 are being tested. Radioimmunotherapy with Yttrium 90-ibritumomab tiuxetan and Iodine 131 tositumomab have been tested alone or in combination with chemotherapy, including as part of HDT and autologous stem cell transplantation, in which they showed the best results. New vaccine modalities are exploring the use of tumor cell-based vaccines or of agents that block or activate costimulatory pathways/molecules, such as CTLA-4-Ig. Allogenic transplantation represents a potential curative option for MCL, especially nonmyeloablative transplantation, more feasible in that population. A plethora of novel biologic agents have surfaced, such as bortezomib, temsirolimus, thalidomide, lenalidomide, MoAb anti-vascular endothelial growth factor or vascular endothelial growth factor-Trap, and flavopiridol. Other targets include gene transcription through histone regulation; nuclear factor-ķB pathway; protein kinase C inhibitors; small-molecules targeting apoptosis, such as antisense Bcl-2, pan-Bcl-2 family member inhibitors; MoAb agonists of cell death receptors; caspases regulators (inhibitors of apoptosis proteins, survivin); and MDM2 antagonist regulators of p53. A molecular approach to define biomarkers might help identify subgroups of patients and help develop rational therapies.

Old and new perspectives in the pharmacological treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: Hormonal therapy, chemotherapy and molecularly targeted therapies

Hormonal therapy and chemotherapy play a major role in the management of advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. Progesterone therapy obtains overall response rates ranging from 11% to 25% in patients with endometrioid-type tumours, and oral medroxyprogesterone acetate 200mg daily appears to be a reasonable therapeutic option for those lesions that are well differentiated and/or have a high progesterone receptor (PgR) content. However, the activity of progestins is often compromised by the down-regulation of PgR within the target tissues, and therefore therapeutic strategies designed to enhance PgR expression are warranted. Little data are currently available about the new aromatase inhibitors and selective estrogen receptor modulators. As for chemotherapy, the combination of doxorubicin [DOX]+cisplatin [CDDP] achieves overall response rates ranging from 34% to 60%, and the addition of paclitaxel (TAX) seems to improve response rates, progression-free survival and overall survival, but to worsen toxicity profile. A phase III study is currently comparing TAX+DOX+CDDP versus the less toxic combination of TAX+carboplatin. Chemotherapy is active against both endometrioid-type carcinoma and uterine serous papillary carcinoma. However, this latter endometrial malignancy is less chemosensitive than the histologically similar high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Interesting fields of research are represented by investigational agents directed against specific intracellular signal transduction pathways involved in the proliferation, invasiveness and metastatic spread of endometrial cancer. Mammalian target of the rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (gefitinib, erlotinib, lapatinib, the monoclonal antibody cetuximab), imatinib, the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab, and the Clostridium perfrigens enterotoxin are currently under evaluation as molecularly targeted therapies for endometrial cancer. Further investigations addressed to better understand the signal transduction pathways that are disregulated in endometrial carcinogenesis could identify novel biological targets suitable for tailored therapies.

Inhibitors of signal transduction protein kinases as targets for cancer therapy

Cancer development requires that tumour cells attain several capabilities, including increased replicative potentials, anchorage and growth-factor independency, evasion of apoptosis, angiogenesis and metastasis. Many of these processes involve the actions of protein kinases, which have emerged as key regulators of all aspects of neoplasia. Perturbed protein kinase activity is repeatedly found to be associated with human malignancies, making these proteins attractive targets for anti-cancer therapy. The last decade has witnessed an exponential increase in the development of specific small protein kinase inhibitors. Many of them are in clinical trials in patients with different types of cancer and some are successfully used in clinic. This review describes different approaches that are currently applied to develop such specific protein kinase inhibitors and provides an overview of protein kinase inhibitors that are currently in clinical trials or are administered in the clinic. Focus is directed on inhibitors against receptor tyrosine kinases and protein kinases participating in the signalling cascades.