Validating Cell Surface Proteases as Drug Targets for Cancer Therapy: What Do We Know, and Where Do We Go?

Cell surface proteases (also known as ectoproteases) are transmembrane and membrane-bound enzymes involved in various physiological and pathological processes. Several members, most notably dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4/CD26) and its related family member fibroblast activation protein (FAP), aminopeptidase N (APN/CD13), a disintegrin and metalloprotease 17 (ADAM17/TACE), and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) MMP2 and MMP9, are often overexpressed in cancers and have been associated with tumour dysfunction. With multifaceted actions, these ectoproteases have been validated as therapeutic targets for cancer. Numerous inhibitors have been developed to target these enzymes, attempting to control their enzymatic activity. Even though clinical trials with these compounds did not show the expected results in most cases, the field of ectoprotease inhibitors is growing. This review summarizes the current knowledge on this subject and highlights the recent development of more effective and selective drugs targeting ectoproteases among which small molecular weight inhibitors, peptide conjugates, prodrugs, or monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and derivatives. These promising avenues have the potential to deliver novel therapeutic strategies in the treatment of cancers.

Clinical implications of fibroblast activation protein in patients with colon cancer

PURPOSE

Human fibroblast activation protein (FAP)/seprase is a 97-kDa surface glycoprotein expressed on tumor associated fibroblasts in the majority of epithelial cancers including colon adenocarcinomas. FAP overexpression in human tumor cells has been shown to promote tumor growth in animal models, and clinical trials targeting FAP enzymatic activity have been initiated. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical significance of stromal FAP in human colon cancers by immunohistochemisty.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Sections of paraffin-embedded resected primary human colon cancer specimens from 1996 through 2001 within the Fox Chase Cancer Center tumor bank were stained with D8 antibody directed against FAP/seprase. Xenotransplanted human colorectal tumors in mice were examined similarly for stromal FAP in tumors of different sizes. Overall percentage of stromal FAP staining of the primary tumor was assessed semiquantitatively (0, 1+, 2+, 3+) and staining intensity was also graded (none, weak, intermediate, strong). Survival time and time to recurrence data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier plots, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-eight patients with resected specimens were available for study (mean follow-up, 1,050 days) with 6 (4%) stage I, 52 (38%) stage II, 43 (31%) stage III, and 37 (27%) stage IV patients. FAP was detected in >93% of specimens. Semiquantitative staining was scored as 1+ in 28 (20%), 2+ in 52 (38%), and 3+ in 49 (35%). FAP staining intensity was graded as weak in 45 (33%), intermediate in 48 (35%), and dark in 36 (26%). Stromal FAP was found to correlate inversely with tumor stage (semiquantitative, P = 0.01; intensity, P = 0.009) and with tumor size of the tumor xenograft model (correlation coefficient, -0.61; P = 0.047), suggesting that stromal FAP may have a greater role in the early development of tumors. Furthermore, greater stromal FAP for patients with known metastatic disease was associated with a decreased survival.

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that patients whose colon tumors have high levels of stromal FAP are more likely to have aggressive disease progression and potential development of metastases or recurrence. This study affirms the rationale for ongoing clinical investigations using FAP as a therapeutic target to disrupt FAP-driven tumor progression in patients with metastatic disease. It also suggests that the effects of FAP inhibition should be investigated in earlier-stage tumors, given its high levels and potential effect earlier in the course of the disease.

Salvage Therapy for Advanced Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer: Factors Influencing Treatment Selection

Novel chemotherapies and molecularly targeted agents have improved outcomes for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several efficacious regimens are available, which allows for selection of therapy based on factors such as schedule, toxicity profile, patient-specific needs, and individual preferences of the patient. Treatment guidelines recommend platinum-based chemotherapy first line for patients with a good performance status. These regimens offer a modest survival advantage over best supportive care. The role of targeted biologic agents in this setting is being assessed in phase II trials. Results to date show promising activity and tolerability. Erlotinib, docetaxel, and pemetrexed are all approved for patients who progress following one prior regimen for advanced NSCLC. These agents have different tolerability profiles and routes of administration but appear to have similar effects on tumor response and survival, though comparative trials are required to confirm this. Based on the results of a phase III trial, erlotinib is also recommended for third-line use in patients with NSCLC. Identifying predictive markers of clinical response to therapy may provide an opportunity to better select patient subsets appropriate for specific treatment. Recent data have linked various clinical characteristics and biologic markers with outcome to HER-1/EGFR-targeted agents. However, many of these studies are retrospective and based on small patient numbers, and there is evidence of broad benefit across diverse patient subgroups with erlotinib. Prospective, randomized trials are required to validate potential predictive markers fully before they are applied to clinical practice.