Phase II study of temozolomide in relapsed or refractory high-risk neuroblastoma: a joint Société Française des Cancers de l'Enfant and United Kingdom Children Cancer Study Group-New Agents Group Study

Gastric Ganglioneuroblastoma in an Elderly man: A Case Report and Literature Review

Background. Ganglioneuroblastoma is a borderline tumor of sympathetic origin that is considered a childhood disease, with the majority of patients occurring in children less than five years old and few patients occurring in adults. There are no treatment guidelines for adult ganglioneuroblastoma. Here, we report a rare patient of adult gastric ganglioneuroblastoma that was completely resected by a laparoscopic approach. Case presentation. A 73-year-old man presented with dull pain in the upper abdomen along with abdominal distension for one month. Gastroscopy examination revealed chronic gastritis and submucosal tumors of the gastric antrum. Endoscopic ultrasonography showed a hypoechoic mass in the gastric antrum arising from the muscularis propria. An abdominal computed tomography scan revealed an irregular soft tissue mass in the gastric antrum with heterogeneous enhancement in the arterial phase. The mass was completely resected by laparoscopic surgery. Postoperative histopathology revealed that the mass contained differentiated neuroblasts, mature ganglion cells and ganglioneuroma components. The pathological diagnosis was ganglioneuroblastoma intermixed, and the patient was determined to be in stage I. The patient received no adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy. At his two-year follow-up, the patient was doing well and showed no signs of recurrence. Conclusion. Despite the rarity of gastric ganglioneuroblastoma as a primary site of origin, it should be considered in the differential diagnosis of gastric masses in adults. Radical surgery is sufficient for the treatment of ganglioneuroblastoma intermixed, and long-term follow-up should be performed.

Bevacizumab, Irinotecan, or Topotecan Added to Temozolomide for Children With Relapsed and Refractory Neuroblastoma: Results of the ITCC-SIOPEN BEACON-Neuroblastoma Trial

PURPOSE

Outcomes for children with relapsed and refractory high-risk neuroblastoma (RR-HRNB) remain dismal. The BEACON Neuroblastoma trial (EudraCT 2012-000072-42) evaluated three backbone chemotherapy regimens and the addition of the antiangiogenic agent bevacizumab (B).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients age 1-21 years with RR-HRNB with adequate organ function and performance status were randomly assigned in a 3 × 2 factorial design to temozolomide (T), irinotecan-temozolomide (IT), or topotecan-temozolomide (TTo) with or without B. The primary end point was best overall response (complete or partial) rate (ORR) during the first six courses, by RECIST or International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria for patients with measurable or evaluable disease, respectively. Safety, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) time were secondary end points.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty patients with RR-HRNB were included. For B random assignment (n = 160), the ORR was 26% (95% CI, 17 to 37) with B and 18% (95% CI, 10 to 28) without B (risk ratio [RR], 1.52 [95% CI, 0.83 to 2.77]; P = .17). Adjusted hazard ratio for PFS and OS were 0.89 (95% CI, 0.63 to 1.27) and 1.01 (95% CI, 0.70 to 1.45), respectively. For irinotecan ([I]; n = 121) and topotecan (n = 60) random assignments, RRs for ORR were 0.94 and 1.22, respectively. A potential interaction between I and B was identified. For patients in the bevacizumab-irinotecan-temozolomide (BIT) arm, the ORR was 23% (95% CI, 10 to 42), and the 1-year PFS estimate was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.47 to 0.80).

CONCLUSION

The addition of B met protocol-defined success criteria for ORR and appeared to improve PFS. Within this phase II trial, BIT showed signals of antitumor activity with acceptable tolerability. Future trials will confirm these results in the chemoimmunotherapy era.

Early Salvage Chemo-Immunotherapy with Irinotecan, Temozolomide and Naxitamab Plus GM-CSF (HITS) for Patients with Primary Refractory High-Risk Neuroblastoma Provide the Best Chance for Long-Term Outcomes

Patients with high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NB) who are unable to achieve a complete response (CR) to induction therapy have worse outcomes. We investigated the combination of humanized anti-GD2 mAb naxitamab (Hu3F8), irinotecan (I), temozolomide (T), and sargramostim (GM-CSF)-HITS-against primary resistant HR-NB. Eligibility criteria included having a measurable chemo-resistant disease at the end of induction (EOI) treatment. Patients were excluded if they had progressive disease (PD) during induction. Prior anti-GD2 mAb and/or I/T therapy was permitted. Each cycle, administered four weeks apart, comprised Irinotecan 50 mg/m2/day intravenously (IV) plus Temozolomide 150 mg/m2/day orally (days 1-5); naxitamab 2.25 mg/kg/day IV on days 2, 4, 8 and 10, (total 9 mg/kg or 270 mg/m2 per cycle), and GM-CSF 250 mg/m2/day subcutaneously was used (days 6-10). Toxicity was measured using CTCAE v4.0 and responses through the modified International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria (INRC). Thirty-four patients (median age at treatment initiation, 4.9 years) received 164 (median 4; 1-12) HITS cycles. Toxicities included myelosuppression and diarrhea, which was expected with I/T, and pain and hypertension, expected with naxitamab. Grade ≥3-related toxicities occurred in 29 (85%) of the 34 patients; treatment was outpatient. The best responses were CR = 29% (n = 10); PR = 3% (n = 1); SD = 53% (n = 18); PD = 5% (n = 5). For cohort 1 (early treatment), the best responses were CR = 47% (n = 8) and SD = 53% (n = 9). In cohort 2 (late treatment), the best responses were CR = 12% (n = 2); PR = 6% (n = 1); SD = 53% (n = 9); and PD = 29% (n = 5). Cohort 1 had a 3-year OS of 84.8% and EFS 54.4%, which are statistically significant improvements (EFS p = 0.0041 and OS p = 0.0037) compared to cohort 2. In conclusion, naxitamab-based chemo-immunotherapy is effective against primary chemo-resistant HR-NB, increasing long-term outcomes when administered early during the course of treatment.

Antitumor activity of the investigational B7-H3 antibody-drug conjugate, vobramitamab duocarmazine, in preclinical models of neuroblastoma

INTRODUCTION

B7-H3 is a potential target for pediatric cancers, including neuroblastoma (NB). Vobramitamab duocarmazine (also referred to as MGC018 and herein referred to as vobra duo) is an investigational duocarmycin-based antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) directed against the B7-H3 antigen. It is composed of an anti-B7-H3 humanized IgG1/kappa monoclonal antibody chemically conjugated through a cleavable valine-citrulline linker to a duocarmycin-hydroxybenzamide azaindole (vc-seco-DUBA). Vobra duo has shown preliminary clinical activity in B7-H3-expressing tumors.

METHODS

B7-H3 expression was evaluated by flow-cytometry in a panel of human NB cell lines. Cytotoxicity was evaluated in monolayer and in multicellular tumor spheroid (MCTS) models by the water-soluble tetrazolium salt,MTS, proliferation assay and Cell Titer Glo 3D cell viability assay, respectively. Apoptotic cell death was investigated by annexin V staining. Orthotopic, pseudometastatic, and resected mouse NB models were developed to mimic disease conditions related to primary tumor growth, metastases, and circulating tumor cells with minimal residual disease, respectively.

RESULTS

All human NB cell lines expressed cell surface B7-H3 in a unimodal fashion. Vobra duo was cytotoxic in a dose-dependent and time-dependent manner against all cell lines (IC50 range 5.1-53.9 ng/mL) and NB MCTS (IC50 range 17.8-364 ng/mL). Vobra duo was inactive against a murine NB cell line (NX-S2) that did not express human B7-H3; however, NX-S2 cells were killed in the presence of vobra duo when co-cultured with human B7-H3-expressing cells, demonstrating bystander activity. In orthotopic and pseudometastatic mouse models, weekly intravenous treatments with 1 mg/kg vobra duo for 3 weeks delayed tumor growth compared with animals treated with an irrelevant (anti-CD20) duocarmycin-ADC. Vobra duo treatment for 4 weeks further increased survival in both orthotopic and resected NB models. Vobra duo compared favorably to TOpotecan-TEMozolomide (TOTEM), the standard-of-care therapy for NB relapsed disease, with tumor relapse delayed or arrested by two or three repeated 4-week vobra duo treatments, respectively. Further increased survival was observed in mice treated with vobra duo in combination with TOTEM. Vobra duo treatment was not associated with body weight loss, hematological toxicity, or clinical chemistry abnormalities.

CONCLUSION

Vobra duo exerts relevant antitumor activity in preclinical B7-H3-expressing NB models and represents a potential candidate for clinical translation.

Efficacy and Feasibility of Proton Beam Therapy in Relapsed High-Risk Neuroblastoma-Experiences from the Prospective KiProReg Registry

BACKGROUND

Despite an intensive multimodal treatment approach, approximately 50% of high-risk (HR) neuroblastoma (NB) patients experience progression. Despite the advances in targeted therapy, high-dose chemotherapy, and other systemic treatment options, radiation therapy (RT) to sites of relapsed disease can be an option to reduce tumor burden and improve chance for disease control.

METHODS

Patients who received salvage irradiation with proton beam therapy (PBT) for local or metastatic relapse of HR NB within the prospective registry trials KiProReg and ProReg were eligible for this retrospective analysis. Data on patient characteristics, multimodality therapy, adverse events, and oncologic endpoints were evaluated. Adverse events were assessed before, during, and after PBT according to common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) V4.0.

RESULTS

Between September 2013 and September 2020, twenty (11 male; 9 female) consecutive patients experiencing local (N = 9) or distant recurrence (N = 25) were identified for this analysis. Distant recurrences included osteomedullary (N = 11) or CNS lesions (N = 14). Salvage therapy consisted of re-induction chemo- or chemo-immuno-therapy (N = 19), surgery (N = 6), high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation (N = 13), radiation (N = 20), and concurrent systemic therapy. Systemic therapy concurrent to RT was given to six patients and included temozolomide (N = 4), carboplatine (N = 1), or anaplastic lymphoma kinase tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKI) (N = 1). A median dose of 36 Gy was applied to the 34 recurrent sites. Local RT was applied to 15 patients, while five patients, received craniospinal irradiation for CNS relapse. After a median follow-up (FU) of 20 months (4-66), the estimated rate for local control, distant metastatic free survival, and overall survival at 3 years was 68.0%, 37.9%, and 61.6%, respectively. During RT, ten patients (50%) presented with a higher-grade acute hematologic adverse event. Late higher-grade sequelae included transient myelitis with transverse section (N = 2) and secondary malignancy outside of the RT field (N = 1).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates the efficacy and safety of RT/PBT for recurrent HR NB in a multimodality second-line approach. To better define the role of RT for these patients, prospective studies would be desirable.

Development of a Hospital Compounded, Taste-Masked, Temozolomide Oral Suspension and 5-Year Real-Life Experience in Treating Paediatric Patients

The development of oral pediatric forms by pharmaceutical companies is still insufficient. In fact, many drugs used in paediatric oncology, such as temozolomide, are not labeled and adapted for paediatric use. Temozolomide (TMZ) is an alkylating agent used as the standard of care for many adult and pediatric brain tumours, such as neuroblastoma, glioblastoma and medulloblastoma. The present study was carried out to propose a suitable and palatable formulation of the oral liquid preparation of TMZ. The suspension is composed of TMZ suspended in SyrSpend SF pH 4, as well as TMZ crystallization stabilizing agents and sweetening agents. To reach this formulation, several taste-masking agents were evaluated. Here, we describe the method of preparation of the formation as well as the monocentric population treated with the formulation over a 5–year period. A 20 mg/mL TMZ suspension was developed. TMZ suspension is stable for 6 weeks, stored between 2 and 8 degrees, protected from light, and compatible with nasogastric tubes. Thirty-eight patients participated in the palatability study and choose cola flavour, and 104 patients were treated in Gustave Roussy with the developed suspension; no unexpected event was reported. To conclude, we propose here a new TMZ liquid formulation which is stable for at least 6 weeks and well-tolerated with extensive feedback.

Irinotecan, Temozolomide, and Dinutuximab With GM-CSF in Children With Refractory or Relapsed Neuroblastoma: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group

PURPOSE

The combination of irinotecan, temozolomide, dintuximab, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (I/T/DIN/GM-CSF) demonstrated activity in patients with relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma in the randomized Children's Oncology Group ANBL1221 trial. To more accurately assess response rate and toxicity, an expanded cohort was nonrandomly assigned to I/T/DIN/GM-CSF.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were eligible at first relapse or first designation of refractory disease. Oral T and intravenous (IV) irinotecan were administered on days 1 to 5 of 21-day cycles. DIN was administered IV (days 2-5), and GM-CSF was administered subcutaneously (days 6-12). The primary end point was objective response, analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis per the International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria.

RESULTS

Seventeen eligible patients were randomly assigned to I/T/DIN/GM-CSF (February 2013 to March 2015); 36 additional patients were nonrandomly assigned to I/T/DIN/GM-CSF (August 2016 to May 2017). Objective (complete or partial) responses were observed in nine (52.9%) of 17 randomly assigned patients (95% CI, 29.2% to 76.7%) and 13 (36.1%) of 36 expansion patients (95% CI, 20.4% to 51.8%). Objective responses were seen in 22 (41.5%) of 53 patients overall (95% CI, 28.2% to 54.8%); stable disease was also observed in 22 of 53. One-year progression-free and overall survival for all patients receiving I/T/DIN/GM-CSF were 67.9% ± 6.4% (95% CI, 55.4% to 80.5%) and 84.9% ± 4.9% (95% CI, 75.3% to 94.6%), respectively. Two patients did not receive protocol therapy and were evaluable for response but not toxicity. Common grade ≥ 3 toxicities were fever/infection (18 [35.3%] of 51), neutropenia (17 [33.3%] of 51), pain (15 [29.4%] of 51), and diarrhea (10 [19.6%] of 51). One patient met protocol-defined criteria for unacceptable toxicity (grade 4 hypoxia). Higher DIN trough levels were associated with response.

CONCLUSION

I/T/DIN/GM-CSF has significant antitumor activity in patients with relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma. Study of chemoimmunotherapy in the frontline setting is indicated, as is further evaluation of predictive biomarkers.

Phase II study of temozolomide and topotecan (TOTEM) in children with relapsed or refractory extracranial and central nervous system tumors including medulloblastoma with post hoc Bayesian analysis: A European ITCC study

AIM

To assess objective response after two cycles of temozolomide and topotecan (TOTEM) in children with refractory or relapsed miscellaneous extracranial solid and central nervous system (CNS) tumors, including medulloblastoma and primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNET).

PROCEDURE

Multicenter, nonrandomized, phase 2 basket trial including children with solid tumors, completed by a one-stage design confirmatory cohort for medulloblastoma, and an exploratory cohort for PNET. Main eligibility criteria were refractory/relapsed measurable disease and no more than two prior treatment lines. Temozolomide was administered orally at 150 mg/m² /day followed by topotecan at 0.75 mg/m² /day intravenously for five consecutive days every 28 days. Tumor response was assessed every two cycles according to WHO criteria and reviewed independently.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were enrolled and treated in the miscellaneous solid tumor and 33 in the CNS strata; 20 patients with medulloblastoma and six with PNET were included in the expansion cohorts. The median age at inclusion was 10.0 years (range, 0.9-20.9). In the basket cohorts, confirmed complete and partial responses were observed in one glioma, four medulloblastoma, and one PNET, leading to the extension. The overall objective response rate (ORR) in medulloblastoma was 28% (95% CI, 12.7-47.2) with 1/29 complete and 7/29 partial responses, those for PNET 10% (95% CI, 0.3-44.5). Post hoc Bayesian analysis estimates that the true ORR in medulloblastoma is probably between 20% and 30% and below 20% in PNET. The most common treatment-related toxicities of the combination therapy were hematologic.

CONCLUSIONS

Temozolomide-topotecan results in significant ORR in children with recurrent and refractory medulloblastoma with a favorable toxicity profile.

A systematic review of re-induction chemotherapy for children with relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma

BACKGROUND

Despite aggressive multimodal therapy, >50% of children with high-risk neuroblastoma (HRNB) relapse. Survival after relapse is rare, and no consensus currently exists on the most effective therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review of the literature on effectiveness of re-induction chemotherapy in children with relapsed HRNB.

METHODS

Database searches were performed to identify studies looking at response to 1st line chemotherapy for children >12 months at diagnosis with first relapse of HRNB. Studies not reporting separate outcomes for HRNB patients or of refractory patients only were excluded. Two independent reviewers extracted the data and assessed study quality using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa tool.

RESULTS

Nine studies were identified fitting the inclusion criteria. All except one were single arm cohorts, and two were retrospective database reviews from single centres. One was a multicentre randomised controlled trial. All used a version of the validated International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria with 8 recording best ever response and 1 at a specified time, and 5 had central review. The proportion of relapsed patients varied from 24 to 100% with 30-93% receiving upfront myeloablative therapy. The response rate varied from 6 to 64%; however, because of heterogeneity, studies were not directly comparable, and no single treatment emerged as the most effective re-induction therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

To date, there is no clear superior re-induction therapy for 1st relapse of HRNB. Randomised controlled trials with separate arms for relapsed versus refractory disease are needed to determine optimal re-induction chemotherapy to act as a backbone for testing newer targeted agents.

Preclinical evaluation of the first intravenous small molecule MDM2 antagonist alone and in combination with temozolomide in neuroblastoma

High‐risk neuroblastoma, a predominantly TP53 wild‐type (wt) tumour, is incurable in >50% patients supporting the use of MDM2 antagonists as novel therapeutics. Idasanutlin (RG7388) shows in vitro synergy with chemotherapies used to treat neuroblastoma. This is the first study to evaluate the in vivo efficacy of the intravenous idasanutlin prodrug, RO6839921 (RG7775), both alone and in combination with temozolomide in TP53 wt orthotopic neuroblastoma models. Detection of active idasanutlin using liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry and p53 pathway activation by ELISA assays and Western analysis showed peak plasma levels 1 h post‐treatment with maximal p53 pathway activation 3–6 h post‐treatment. RO6839921 and temozolomide, alone or in combination in mice implanted with TP53 wt SHSY5Y‐Luc and NB1691‐Luc cells showed that combined RO6839921 and temozolomide led to greater tumour growth inhibition and increase in survival compared to vehicle control. Overall, RO6839921 had a favourable pharmacokinetic profile consistent with intermittent dosing and was well tolerated alone and in combination. These preclinical studies support the further development of idasanutlin in combination with temozolomide in neuroblastoma in early phase clinical trials.

What's new?

Long‐term survival of high‐risk neuroblastoma patients currently averages than 50%. New therapies that both improve survival and reduce treatment toxicity are urgently needed. MDM2 antagonists are a novel class of anti‐cancer agents that stabilize the p53 pathway and lead to tumour suppression. In this preclinical study, the authors tested a prodrug of the MDM2 inhibitor idasanutlin in mice. They found that this compound inhibited tumour growth and increased survival, especially in combination with temozolomide. These results support the further development of idasanutlin plus temozolomide in clinical trials for neuroblastoma.

Hitherto unseen survival in an ALK-positive-patient with advanced stage adult ganglioneuroblastoma treated with personalized medicine

Survival of stage 4 ganglioneuroblastoma (GNB) patients is poor; no reports exist of patients surviving up to 5 years (1, 2). We report the clinical and therapeutic course of a patient with stage 4 GNB surviving beyond expectations due to a multimodal treatment approach incorporating new technologies in cancer diagnostic and treatment.

Investigational drugs in phase II clinical trials for the treatment of neuroblastoma

INTRODUCTION

Neuroblastoma (NB) is an embryonal tumor originating from undifferentiated neural crest cell, highly heterogeneous ranging from spontaneous regression to progression despite multimodal treatments. Approximately, 20% of patients are refractory to frontline therapy and 50% will relapse/progress after an initial response. The overall five year survival for high-risk neuroblastoma ranges from 35-45%. Despite enhanced understanding of NB biology and the addition of myeloablative chemotherapy, isotretinoin and immunotherapy, survival for high risk NB remains less than 50%. Areas covered: This review summarizes and gives a critical overview of phase II trials investigating therapies for relapsed-refractory and high risk neuroblastoma. Expert opinion: Several novel molecules have been developed and are currently under investigation for the treatment of NB. The trend of novel targeted agents is one towards individualized, tailored therapy, based on the molecular and biological differences that characterize tumors that seem similar based solely on histological analysis. The task of developing new molecules is particularly difficult for NB, given the recurrent development of new patterns of drug resistance. However, even if current research is focused towards identifying the best treatments for each children and young adult with a NB defined disease, a deeper knowledge of the molecular biology and genetics is needed.

Combination of bevacizumab, irinotecan, and temozolomide for refractory or relapsed neuroblastoma: Results of a phase II study

BACKGROUND

The rationale for studying the combination of bevacizumab, irinotecan, and temozolomide (BIT) in neuroblastoma (NB) is based on the following: (i) vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression is associated with an aggressive phenotype, (ii) anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab enhances irinotecan-mediated suppression of NB xenografts, (iii) bevacizumab safety has been established in pediatric phase I studies, and (iv) irinotecan + temozolomide (IT) is a standard salvage chemotherapy.

PROCEDURE

We conducted a phase II study of BIT in patients with measurable/evaluable refractory or relapsed high-risk NB (www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01114555). Each cycle consisted of bevacizumab (15 mg/kg intravenously [IV]) on days 1 and 15 plus irinotecan (50 mg/m2 /day IV) and temozolomide (150 mg/m2 /day orally) on days 4-8. Patients could have previously received, but not relapsed on, IT. An early stopping rule mandated continuing therapy only if more than five patients of 27 evaluable patients achieved partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) after four cycles.

RESULTS

Thirty-three heavily pretreated patients (nine primary refractory; 24 relapsed) received one to eight cycles of BIT. Toxicities were expected and transient. Grade 4 toxicities were neutropenia (30%) and thrombocytopenia (24%). Grade 3 toxicities included hepatic transaminitis (15%), proteinuria (9%), and diarrhea (3%). Overall responses were as follows: three CR (all in prior IT-treated patients), 18 no response, and 12 progressive disease. Only one of 23 patients assessable for the early stopping rule regarding efficacy achieved PR/CR, so patient accrual was discontinued. Median progression-free survival and overall survival was 7.7 ± 1.7 and 31.5 ± 5.6 months, respectively; all patients continued anti-NB therapy post-BIT.

CONCLUSIONS

BIT was well tolerated, but the addition of bevacizumab did not improve response rates in resistant NB compared to historical data for IT.

Outcome of children with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma: A meta-analysis of ITCC/SIOPEN European phase II clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Few randomized trials have been conducted in children with relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma and data about outcomes including progression-free survival (PFS) in these patients are scarce.

PROCEDURE

A meta-analysis of three phase II studies of children with relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma conducted in Europe (temozolomide, topotecan-vincristine-doxorubicin and topotecan-temozolomide) was performed. Individual patient data with extended follow-up were collected from the trial databases after publication to describe trial outcomes (response rate, clinical benefit ratio, duration of treatment, PFS, and overall survival [OS]). Characteristics of subjects with relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma were compared.

RESULTS

Data from 71 children and adolescents with relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma were collected. Response definitions were not homogeneous in the three trials. Patients were on study for a median of 3.5 months (interquartile range [IQR] 1.9-6.2). Of those, 35.2% achieved a complete or partial response, 26.3% experienced a response after more than two cycles, and 23.9% received more than six cycles. Median PFS from study entry for all, refractory, and relapsed patients was 6.4 ± 1.0, 12.5 ± 6.8, and 5.7 ± 1.0 months, respectively (P = 0.006). Median OS from study entry for all, refractory, and relapsed patients was 16.1 ± 4.3, 27.9 ± 20.2, and 11.0 ± 1.6 months, respectively (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline data for response rate, clinical benefit ratio, duration of treatment, PFS, and OS were provided. Two subpopulations (relapsed/refractory) were clearly distinct and should be included in the interpretation of all trials. These results should help informing the design of forthcoming studies in relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma.

Factors associated with recurrence and survival length following relapse in patients with neuroblastoma

Background:

Despite therapeutic advances, survival following relapse for neuroblastoma patients remains poor. We investigated clinical and biological factors associated with length of progression-free and overall survival following relapse in UK neuroblastoma patients.

Methods:

All cases of relapsed neuroblastoma, diagnosed during 1990–2010, were identified from four Paediatric Oncology principal treatment centres. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to calculate post-relapse overall survival (PROS), post-relapse progression-free survival (PRPFS) between relapse and further progression, and to investigate influencing factors.

Results:

One hundred eighty-nine cases were identified from case notes, 159 (84.0%) high risk and 17 (9.0%), unresectable, MYCN non-amplified (non-MNA) intermediate risk (IR). For high-risk patients diagnosed >2000, median PROS was 8.4 months (interquartile range (IQR)=3.0–17.4) and median PRPFS was 4.7 months (IQR=2.1–7.1). For IR, unresectable non-MNA patients, median PROS was 11.8 months (IQR 9.0–51.6) and 5-year PROS was 24% (95% CI 7–45%). MYCN amplified (MNA) disease and bone marrow metastases at diagnosis were independently associated with worse PROS for high-risk cases. Eighty percent of high-risk relapses occurred within 2 years of diagnosis compared with 50% of unresectable non-MNA IR disease.

Conclusions:

Patients with relapsed HR neuroblastomas should be treatment stratified according to MYCN status and PRPFS should be the primary endpoint in early phase clinical trials. The failure to salvage the majority of IR neuroblastoma is concerning, supporting investigation of intensification of upfront treatment regimens in this group to determine whether their use would diminish likelihood of relapse.

A Phase 1 Trial of TPI 287 as a Single Agent and in Combination With Temozolomide in Patients with Refractory or Recurrent Neuroblastoma or Medulloblastoma

BACKGROUND

The primary aim of this Phase I study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of TPI 287 and the safety and tolerability of TPI 287 alone and in combination with temozolomide (TMZ) in pediatric patients with refractory or recurrent neuroblastoma or medulloblastoma. The secondary aims were to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of TPI 287 and the treatment responses.

PROCEDURE

Eighteen patients were enrolled to a phase I dose escalation trial of weekly intravenous infusion of TPI 287 for two 28-day cycles with toxicity monitoring to determine the MTD, followed by two cycles of TPI 287 in combination with TMZ. Samples were collected to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters C(max), AUC(0-24), t(1/2), CL, and Vd on day 1 of cycles 1 (TPI 287 alone) and 3 (TPI 287 + TMZ) following TPI 287 infusion. Treatment response was evaluated by radiographic (CT or MRI) and radionuclide (MIBG) imaging for neuroblastoma.

RESULTS

We determined the MTD of TPI 287 alone and in combination with temozolomide to be 125 mg/m(2). The non-dose-limiting toxicities at this dose were mainly anorexia and pain. The dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of two patients at 135 mg/m(2) were grade 3 hemorrhagic cystitis and grade 3 sensory neuropathy.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, TPI 287 was well tolerated by pediatric patients with refractory and relapsed neuroblastoma and medulloblastoma at a dose of 125 mg/m(2) IV on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28 day cycle.

Pretreatment but not subsequent coincubation with midazolam reduces the cytotoxicity of temozolomide in neuroblastoma cells

Background

Temozolomide (TMZ) induces a G2/M cell cycle arrest and is used for treatment of paediatric tumours, especially neuroblastomas. Patients treated with TMZ frequently receive midazolam for sedation prior to surgery and other interventions. Previous studies suggested both cytoprotective and apoptosis-inducing properties of midazolam. Therefore, the impact of midazolam on TMZ-induced cytotoxicity was investigated in vitro.

Methods

Human neuroblastoma cells were incubated with midazolam alone, as a pretreatment prior to incubation with TMZ or a coincubation of both. Cell viability and proliferation was analysed (XTT and BrdU assay) after 24 h and flowcytometric cell cycle analysis was performed after 24 and 48 h.

Results

Midazolam alone increased cell viability at lower concentrations (2, 4, 8, 16 μM), whereas higher concentrations (128, 256, 512 μM) reduced cell viability. Pretreatment with midazolam 6 h prior to TMZ incubation reduced cytotoxic effects (IC₂₅ 1005 ± 197 μM; IC₅₀ 1676 ± 557 μM; P < 0.05) compared to incubation with TMZ alone (IC₂₅ 449 ± 304 μM; IC₅₀ 925 ± 196 μM) and reduced the antiproliferative effect of TMZ (1000 μM) by 43.9 % (P < 0.05). In contrast, cytotoxic effects of TMZ were increased (IC₇₅ 1175 ± 221 μM vs. 2764 ± 307 μM; P < 0.05) when midazolam pretreatment was followed by coincubation of midazolam and TMZ. Cell cycle analysis revealed increased fractions of cells in G2/M phase after TMZ treatment (100 μM; 48 h), irrespective of midazolam pretreatment.

Conclusion

Midazolam causes a hormetic dose–response relationship in human neuroblastoma cells. Pretreatment with midazolam reduces the cytotoxic and antiproliferative effects of TMZ without interfering with G2/M cell cycle arrest. In contrast, subsequent midazolam coincubation increases overall cytotoxicity.

Adult onset of ganglioneuroblastoma of the adrenal gland: case report and review of the literature

Ganglioneuroblastoma (GBN) is a malignant neoplasm of the autonomic nervous system. Adult onset of ganglioneuroblastoma is extremely rare. Only 16 cases have been reported in English literature, to date. Surgery represents the first-line therapy for the treatment of ganglioneuroblastoma. Radiation therapy is indicated in patients with localized unresectable disease. Chemotherapy is reserved for metastatic disease.

We present the case of a 63-year-old man affected by ganglioneuroblastoma of the adrenal gland. The diagnosis was made incidentally. The tumor, measuring 5 × 3 cm, was successfully surgically removed.

Additional Therapies to Improve Metastatic Response to Induction Therapy in Children With High-risk Neuroblastoma

Children with high-risk neuroblastoma who fail to achieve adequate metastatic response after induction chemotherapy have dismal outcome and new therapeutic strategies are needed. However, timing of introduction of novel agents still remains under discussion. Given an increase in number of phase I-II studies of molecularly targeted drugs in neuroblastoma, it is crucial to determine, as early as possible, which patients may be suitable candidates for new therapeutic strategies. This single-center retrospective analysis of patients with high-risk neuroblastoma showed that the addition of conventional chemotherapy improved the quality of metastatic response only for the group of patients with partial response. It is therefore proposed to develop stratification criteria for those patients very unlikely to benefit from a plethora of additional lines of treatment, but might benefit from introduction of novel agents.

Patients in pediatric phase I and early phase II clinical oncology trials at Gustave Roussy: a 13-year center experience

In the European Union, the pediatric medicines regulation in 2007 modified significantly the access to new agents in pediatric oncology. Early oncology trials are still thought to be associated with limited benefit and substantial risk. We report the characteristics and outcome of patients below 21 years enrolled in investigational trials in the Pediatric and Adolescent Department at Gustave Roussy between January 2000 and December 2012. A total of 235 patients (median age, 10.4 [0.8 to 20.7] y) were included in 26 trials (16 cytotoxic and 10 targeted agents) for a total of 260 inclusions. A total of 117 patients (50%) had brain tumors and 68 (29%) had various soft tissue and bone sarcoma. Thirteen of the 106 patients in a phase I trial experienced dose-limiting toxicity. Main severe toxicity was hematologic; none had toxic death. Grade 3 to 4 toxicities were associated with combination trials, cytotoxic agent, and at least 1 previous line of therapy. Thirty patients (12%) had objective response and 42 (16%) had stable disease for >4 months. Median overall survival was 9.0 months (95% CI, 7.5-10.5) and 73% of patients received further anticancer treatment. Phase I to II pediatric oncology trials are safe, associated with clinical benefit, and can be successfully integrated in current relapse strategies.

Phase 1 evaluation of EZN-2208, a polyethylene glycol conjugate of SN38, in children adolescents and young adults with relapsed or refractory solid tumors

BACKGROUND

EZN-2208 is a water-soluble PEGylated conjugate of the topoisomerase inhibitor SN38, the active metabolite of irinotecan. Compared to irinotecan, EZN-2208 has a prolonged half-life permitting extended exposure to SN38. EZN-2208 has demonstrated clinical tolerability and antitumor activity in adults with advanced solid tumors. This Phase 1 study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor activity of EZN-2208 in children with relapsed or refractory solid tumors.

PROCEDURE

EZN-2208 was administered as a 1-hour intravenous infusion once every 21 days at five dose levels (12-30 mg/m(2) ). Filgrastim or pegfilgrastim was administered 24-48 hours after treatment with EZN-2208. The rolling-six design was used for dose determination.

RESULTS

Thirty eligible patients (15 females; median [range] age 11.5 years [2-21 years]) were treated with EZN-2208. Dose-limiting diarrhea occurred in one patient receiving 16 mg/m(2) and dose-limiting dehydration was seen in one patient receiving 24 mg/m(2) . At dose levels above 16 mg/m(2) , Grade ≥3 myelosuppression was demonstrated in the majority of patients. Additional adverse events included nausea, vomiting, and fatigue. The maximum tolerated dose was identified as 24 mg/m(2) due to dose-limiting thrombocytopenia in two patients receiving 30 mg/m(2) . Two of nine patients with neuroblastoma who were evaluable for response had partial responses. Five patients (four with neuroblastoma) remained on study for ≥8 cycles.

CONCLUSIONS

EZN-2208 was generally well-tolerated and was associated with clinical benefit in patients with neuroblastoma.

Phase II study of temozolomide in combination with topotecan (TOTEM) in relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma: a European Innovative Therapies for Children with Cancer-SIOP-European Neuroblastoma study

PURPOSE

To assess objective response rate (ORR) after two cycles of temozolomide in combination with topotecan (TOTEM) in children with refractory or relapsed neuroblastoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multicenter, non-randomised, phase II study included children with neuroblastoma according to a two-stage Simon design. Eligibility criteria included relapsed or refractory, measurable or metaiodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) evaluable disease, no more than two lines of prior treatment. Temozolomide was administered orally at 150mg/m(2) followed by topotecan at 0.75mg/m(2) intravenously for five consecutive days every 28days. Tumour response was assessed every two cycles according to International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria (INRC), and reviewed independently.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were enroled and treated in 15 European centres with a median age of 5.4years. Partial tumour response after two cycles was observed in 7 out of 38 evaluable patients [ORR 18%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 8-34%]. The best ORR whatever the time of evaluation was 24% (95% CI, 11-40%) with a median response duration of 8.5months. Tumour control rate (complete response (CR)+partial response (PR)+mixed response (MR)+stable disease (SD)) was 68% (95% CI, 63-90%). The 12-months Progression-Free and Overall Survival were 42% and 58% respectively. Among 213 treatment cycles (median 4, range 1-12 per patient) the most common treatment-related toxicities were haematologic. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 62% of courses in 89% of patients, grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in 47% of courses in 71% of patients; three patients (8%) had febrile neutropenia.

CONCLUSION

Temozolomide-Topotecan combination results in very encouraging ORR and tumour control in children with heavily pretreated recurrent and refractory neuroblastoma with favourable toxicity profile.

Current and future strategies for relapsed neuroblastoma: challenges on the road to precision therapy

More than half of the patients with high-risk neuroblastoma (NB) will relapse despite intensive multimodal therapy, with an additional 10% to 20% refractory to induction chemotherapy. Management of these patients is challenging, given disease heterogeneity, resistance, and organ toxicity including poor hematological reserve. This review will discuss the current treatment options and consider novel therapies on the horizon. Cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens for relapse and refractory NB typically center on the use of the camptothecins, topotecan and irinotecan, in combination with agents such as cyclophosphamide and temozolomide, with objective responses but poor long-term survival. I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine therapy is also effective for relapsed patients with meta-iodobenzylguanidine-avid disease, with objective responses in a third of cases. Immunotherapy with anti-GD2 has recently been incorporated into upfront therapy, but its role in the relapse setting remains uncertain, especially for patients with bulky disease. Future cell-based immunotherapies and other approaches may be able to overcome this limitation. Finally, many novel molecularly targeted agents are in development, some of which show specific promise for NB. Successful incorporation of these agents will require combinations with conventional cytotoxic chemotherapies, as well as the development of predictive biomarkers, to ultimately personalize approaches to patients with "targetable" molecular abnormalities.

Initial testing (stage 1) of temozolomide by the pediatric preclinical testing program

BACKGROUND

The DNA methylating agent temozolomide was developed primarily for treatment of glioblastoma. However, preclinical data have suggested a broader application for treatment of childhood cancer. Temozolomide was tested against the PPTP solid tumor and ALL models.

PROCEDURES

Temozolomide was tested against the PPTP in vitro panel at concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 1,000 µM and was tested against the PPTP in vivo panels at doses from 22 to 100 mg/kg administered orally daily for 5 days, repeated at day 21.

RESULTS

In vitro temozolomide showed cytotoxicity with a median relative IC50 (rIC50 ) value of 380 µM against the PPTP cell lines (range 1 to > 1,000 µM). The three lines with rIC50 values lesser than 10 µM had low MGMT expression compared to the remaining cell lines. In vivo temozolomide demonstrated significant toxicity at 100 mg/kg, but induced tumor regressions in 15 of 23 evaluable solid tumor models (13 maintained CR [MCR], 2 CR) and 5 of 8 ALL models (3 MCR, 2 CR). There was a steep dose response curve, with lower activity at 66 mg/kg temozolomide and with tumor regressions at 22 and 44 mg/kg restricted to models with low MGMT expression.

CONCLUSIONS

Temozolomide demonstrated high level antitumor activity against both solid tumor and leukemia models, but also elicited significant toxicity at the highest dose level. Lowering the dose of TMZ to more closely match clinical exposures markedly reduced the antitumor activity for many xenograft lines with responsiveness at lower doses closely related to low MGMT expression.

Ten challenges in the management of neuroblastoma

Neuroblastoma is a complex disease with many contradictions and challenges. It is, by and large, a cancer of babies and preschool children, but it does occur, albeit increasingly rarely, in older children, adolescents and young adults. The prognosis is very variable, with outcome related to age, stage and molecular pathology. Neuroblastoma may behave in an almost benign way, with spontaneous regression in some infants, but the majority of older patients have high-risk disease, which is usually fatal, despite best current treatments. As a rare disease, international collaboration is essential to run clinical trials of adequate statistical power to answer important questions in a reasonable time frame. High-risk disease requires multimodality therapy including chemotherapy, surgery and radiotherapy as well as biological and immunological treatments for optimal outcomes. Innovative treatment approaches, sometimes associated with appreciable toxicity, offer hope for the future but, despite parental wishes, cannot be generally implemented without adequate assessment in clinical trials.

Efficacy of temozolomide in a central nervous system relapse of neuroblastoma with O 6 -methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation

We describe a case of a 5-year-old girl with central nervous system relapse of neuroblastoma after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. Although the brain metastasis was surgically removed, she had a second relapse in the same region with leptomeningeal dissemination despite receiving irinotecan. Administration of temozolomide in addition to irinotecan led to her third complete response and the patient has been in complete response for >24 months. The tumor had no expression of the O -methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) gene due to promoter methylation. Temozolomide is an attractive candidate treatment in neuroblastoma with methylated MGMT, especially in central nervous system relapsed cases.

Treatment of a solid tumor using engineered drug-resistant immunocompetent cells and cytotoxic chemotherapy

Multimodal therapy approaches, such as combining chemotherapy agents with cellular immunotherapy, suffers from potential drug-mediated toxicity to immune effector cells. Overcoming such toxic effects of anticancer cellular products is a potential critical barrier to the development of combined therapeutic approaches. We are evaluating an anticancer strategy that focuses on overcoming such a barrier by genetically engineering drug-resistant variants of immunocompetent cells, thereby allowing for the coadministration of cellular therapy with cytotoxic chemotherapy, a method we refer to as drug-resistant immunotherapy (DRI). The strategy relies on the use of cDNA sequences that confer drug resistance and recombinant lentiviral vectors to transfer nucleic acid sequences into immunocompetent cells. In the present study, we evaluated a DRI-based strategy that incorporates the immunocompetent cell line NK-92, which has intrinsic antitumor properties, genetically engineered to be resistant to both temozolomide and trimetrexate. These immune effector cells efficiently lysed neuroblastoma cell lines, which we show are also sensitive to both chemotherapy agents. The antitumor efficacy of the DRI strategy was demonstrated in vivo, whereby neuroblastoma-bearing NOD/SCID/γ-chain knockout (NSG) mice treated with dual drug-resistant NK-92 cell therapy followed by dual cytotoxic chemotherapy showed tumor regression and significantly enhanced survival compared with animals receiving either nonengineered cell-based therapy and chemotherapy, immunotherapy alone, or chemotherapy alone. These data show there is a benefit to using drug-resistant cellular therapy when combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy approaches.

Treatment and outcomes of patients with relapsed, high-risk neuroblastoma: results of German trials

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of high-risk neuroblastoma patients has improved over the last decades. However, many patients experience relapse after successful initial treatment. We retrospectively analyzed the long-term outcome of relapsed patients of three consecutive national neuroblastoma trials.

METHODS

Patients were included when they fulfilled all of the following criteria: Age at diagnosis being 1 year or older, first diagnosis between 1990 and 2007, stage 4 disease or stage 3 neuroblastoma with MYCN amplification, and relapse or progression after successful first-line autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT).

RESULTS

A total of 451 high-risk neuroblastoma patients 1 year or older underwent ASCT during first-line treatment, 253 experienced recurrence of disease, 158 received salvage chemotherapy, and 23 of them finally underwent a second ASCT. These 23 patients had a better median survival (2.08 years) and 3-year survival rate from recurrence (43.5 ± 10.9%) compared to 74 patients who had no second chemotherapy (median survival 0.24 years, 3-year survival rate 4.0 ± 2.6%) and 135 patients who underwent second-line chemotherapy but did not undergo second ASCT (median survival of 0.89 years, 3-year survival rate 9.6 ± 2.8%, P < 0.001). By February 2010, 3/23 patients were in complete remission, 3/23 in very good partial remission, 1/23 in partial remission, 14/23 patients died of disease after successful second ASCT, and 2/23 died of complications due to second ASCT.

CONCLUSION

Intensive second-line therapy is feasible. A small subgroup of relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma patients may benefit from intensive relapse chemotherapy and second ASCT. The potential of long-term survival justifies clinical trials on intensive second-line treatment.

High-dose carboplatin-irinotecan-temozolomide: treatment option for neuroblastoma resistant to topotecan

BACKGROUND

We report a retrospective study of a novel regimen for neuroblastoma (NB) resistant to standard induction or salvage chemotherapy which now routinely includes topotecan.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-five patients received carboplatin (500 mg/m(2)/day, 2×)-irinotecan (50 mg/m(2)/day, 5×)-temozolomide (250 mg/m(2)/day, 5×) (HD-CIT). Only one course was planned. Patients with thrombocytopenia indicative of poor bone marrow (BM) reserve resulting from extensive prior therapy received peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) post-HD-CIT.

RESULTS

Modest acute toxicity allowed outpatient treatment. Low-grade diarrhea was common; there was no mucositis, nephrotoxicity, or cardiotoxicity. Myelosuppression was prolonged but uncomplicated. The absolute neutrophil count reached 500/µl on days 20-30 (median, 25) in 25 patients with satisfactory BM reserve, and on days 9-14 (median, 11) post-PBSC infusion. Anti-NB activity was common against refractory (non-progressing) disease or new relapse occurring off therapy (68% objective response rate), but not against disease progressing on therapy. Seven of 26 patients treated for refractory NB are progression-free and in complete remission following subsequent therapy, including anti-G(D2) immunotherapy, at ≥ 29+ months post-HD-CIT.

CONCLUSIONS

HD-CIT is appealing as salvage or consolidative therapy because of anti-NB activity and modest non-hematologic toxicity. PBSC support is unnecessary when BM reserve is intact. The wide antineoplastic activity of its three components and their potential for activity against disease in the central nervous system support applicability to other cancers.

Phase II study of irinotecan and temozolomide in children with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma: a Children's Oncology Group study

PURPOSE

This phase II study was conducted to determine the response rate associated with use of irinotecan and temozolomide for children with relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma measurable by cross-sectional imaging (stratum 1) or assessable by bone marrow aspirate/biopsy or metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scan (stratum 2) received irinotecan (10 mg/m(2)/dose 5 days a week for 2 weeks) and temozolomide (100 mg/m(2)/dose for 5 days) every 3 weeks. Response was assessed after three and six courses using International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria. Of the first 25 evaluable patients on a given stratum, five or more patients with complete or partial responses were required to conclude that further study would be merited.

RESULTS

Fifty-five eligible patients were enrolled. The objective response rate was 15%. Fourteen patients (50%) on stratum 1 and 15 patients (56%) on stratum 2 had stable disease. Objective responses were observed in three of the first 25 evaluable patients on stratum 1 and five of the first 25 evaluable patients on stratum 2. Less than 6% of patients experienced ≥ grade 3 diarrhea. Although neutropenia was observed, less than 10% of patients developed evidence of infection while neutropenic.

CONCLUSION

The combination of irinotecan and temozolomide was well tolerated. The objective response rate of 19% in stratum 2 suggests that this combination may be effective for patients with neuroblastoma detectable by MIBG or marrow analysis. Although fewer objective responses were observed in patients with disease measurable by computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging, patients in both strata seem to have derived clinical benefit from this therapy.

Activity of irinotecan and temozolomide in the presence of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase inhibition in neuroblastoma pre-clinical models

Background:

The combination of temozolomide (TMZ) and irinotecan is a regimen used in neuroblastoma patients with recurrent disease. O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) may have a function in resistance to TMZ. Using neuroblastoma pre-clinical models, we determined whether the inhibition of MGMT by O⁶-benzylguanine (O6-BG) could enhance the anti-tumour activity of TMZ and irinotecan.

Methods:

The cytotoxicity of TMZ and irinotecan, either alone or in combination, was measured in five neuroblastoma cell lines in the presence or absence of O6-BG with a fluorescence-based cell viability assay (DIMSCAN). Anti-tumour activity was measured in three neuroblastoma xenograft models.

Results:

MGMT mRNA and protein were expressed in 9 out of 10 examined cell lines. Pretreatment of cells with 25 μM O6-BG decreased MGMT protein expression and enhanced The TMZ cytotoxicity by up to 0.3–1.4 logs in four out of five tested cell lines. TMZ (25 mg kg⁻¹ per day for 5 days every 3 weeks for four cycles) did not significantly improve mice survival, whereas the same schedule of irinotecan (7.5 mg kg⁻¹ per day) significantly improved survival (P<0.0001) in all three xenograft models. Combining O6-BG and/or TMZ with irinotecan further enhanced survival.

Conclusion:

Our in vitro and in vivo findings suggest that irinotecan drives the activity of irinotecan and TMZ in recurrent neuroblastoma. Inhibitors of MGMT warrant further investigation for enhancing the activity of regimens that include TMZ.

Phase I study of topotecan in combination with temozolomide (TOTEM) in relapsed or refractory paediatric solid tumours

PURPOSE

To evaluate maximum tolerated dose and recommended dose (RD) for phase II studies of topotecan (TPT) combined with temozolomide (TMZ) (TOTEM) in children and adolescents with relapsed or refractory solid malignancies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Multicentre, phase I study with a standard '3+3' design in five dose increments. Eligible patients: aged 6 months to 21 years, diagnosis of a solid malignancy failed at least 2 previous lines of therapy. TMZ was administered orally, starting at 100 mg/m(2)/d, and TPT intravenously over 30 min, starting at 0.75 mg/m(2)/d over 5 consecutive days every 28 d. A pharmacokinetics analysis was performed on Day 1 and Day 5 of cycle 1.

RESULTS

Between February and October 2007, 16 patients were treated. The median age was 8.5 years (range, 3-19 years). Dose-limiting toxicity (grade 4 neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia lasting more than 7 d) during the first cycle occurred in 2 of 3 patients at level 3 (TMZ 150 mg/m(2)/d and TPT 1.0 mg/m(2)/d) and was always manageable. Confirmed complete and partial responses were observed in 4 patients (25%), three with metastatic neuroblastoma and one with high-grade glioma. Seven patients had a stable disease. Pharmacokinetic data show a wide inter-individual variability. No significant differences were observed between plasma TMZ and TPT concentrations on Day 1 and Day 5 indicating the absence of pharmacokinetic interaction between the drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

The RD for the combination is TMZ 150 mg/m(2)/d and TPT 0.75 mg/m(2)/d with dose-limiting haematological toxicity. The observed activity deserves further evaluation in paediatric malignancies.

Anti-insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor antibody EM164 (murine AVE1642) exhibits anti-tumour activity alone and in combination with temozolomide against neuroblastoma

Insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R) is overexpressed in many tumours and contributes to tumourigenicity, cell proliferation, metastasis and resistance, thus representing a promising therapeutic target. The human IGF-1R antagonistic monoclonal antibody EM164 (murine AVE1642) has shown activity in adult cancers and is being evaluated in patients with advanced malignancies. We investigated the EM164 for its therapeutic potential against childhood neuroblastoma. EM164 at 0.07, 0.7 and 7 μg/mL exhibited anti-proliferative activity against all nine cell lines tested in (3)H-thymidine incorporation assay in vitro. Cell proliferation after EM164 exposure ranged between 24% and 80% compared to controls. Sensitivity was independent from culture serum conditions, intensity of IGF-1R expression and IGF-II secretion, although associated with inhibition of AKT activation. In vivo, EM164 administered intravenously at 40 mg/kg twice weekly for 4 weeks yielded significant tumour growth delays (TGD) of 13.4d in advanced stage IGR-N91 and 12.9 d in SK-N-AS tumours compared to controls (p = 0.02 and p = 0.0059, respectively). Simultaneous treatment of EM164 0.7 μg/mL and temozolomide resulted in enhanced activity in vitro. In vivo, treatment with temozolomide at the maximum tolerated dose (100mg/kg/d for 5 consecutive days) and EM164 yielded a significantly greater TGD of 29.1d (p<0.01) and two complete tumour regressions (CR) compared to 18.1d (p = ns) and one CR for EM164 alone and 16.1d (p = ns) for temozolomide alone. Our results demonstrate the potential of the anti-IGF-1R antibody alone and in combination with alkylating agents and support the therapeutic development of the AVE1642 for aggressive neuroblastoma.

Phase I trial of two schedules of vincristine, oral irinotecan, and temozolomide (VOIT) for children with relapsed or refractory solid tumors: a Children's Oncology Group phase I consortium study

BACKGROUND

In preclinical models, temozolomide, and vincristine are additive or synergistic with irinotecan. We examined this three-drug combination in children with relapsed solid tumors. Patients received orally administered irinotecan together with temozolomide and vincristine on two different schedules, using cefixime to reduce irinotecan-associated diarrhea.

METHODS

Oral irinotecan was given daily on days 1-5 and 8-12 (Schedule A), or on days 1-5 (Schedule B). Temozolomide was given on days 1-5, with vincristine 1.5 mg/m(2) administered on days 1 and 8 (Schedule A) or day 1 (Schedule B) in 21-day courses.

RESULTS

On Schedule A, the maximum tolerated dose of oral irinotecan was 35 mg/m(2)/day combined with temozolomide 100 mg/m(2)/day and vincristine on days 1 and 8. Dose-limiting toxicities in 4 of 12 patients included hepatotoxicity, abdominal pain, anorexia, hypokalemia, and thrombocytopenia at 50 mg/m(2)/day. Using Schedule B, 0 of 6 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at the highest doses studied of oral irinotecan 90 mg/m(2)/day, temozolomide 150 mg/m(2)/day x 5, and vincristine on day 1. First-course and cumulative toxicity was greater with Schedule A. UGT1A1*28 genotype did not correlate with DLT. At the irinotecan dose of 90 mg/m(2)/day, the mean SN-38 AUC(inf) was 63 ng/ml hr. Activity was seen in sarcoma patients, and overall eight patients received >or=6 courses.

CONCLUSIONS

The 5-day schedule of VOIT was well tolerated and provided SN-38 exposures similar to those achieved with intravenous IRN. Activity on this and prior studies suggests a potential role for VOIT in a spectrum of childhood solid tumors.

Gefitinib in combination with oral topotecan and cyclophosphamide in relapsed neuroblastoma: pharmacological rationale and clinical response

AIM

Activity and toxiciy of gefitinib in combination with topotecan and cyclophosphamide (CPA) were evaluated in a case-series of relapsed neuroblastoma (NB) patients. The in vitro activity of the combination was also assessed.

PROCEDURE

Gefitinib (250 mg/day), topotecan (0.8 mg/m(2)/day), and CPA (50 mg/m(2)/day) (GTC) were administered orally for 14 consecutive days out of 28 days. Antitumor activity of gefitinib as single agent and in combination with either topotecan or CPA was assessed in a panel of NB cell lines.

RESULTS

Ninety-two courses were given in 10 patients. Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 7/92 courses (8%) and grade 4 thrombocytopenia in 8/92 (9%). Two patients had a grade 2 liver toxicity, four a grade 1/2 skin toxicity, and two a grade 1/2 diarrhea. Dose reduction of topotecan and/or CPA was required in eight patients. After four courses, three patients were in partial response (PR) and four with a stable disease (SD), while three experienced a progressive disease (PD). Time to progression (TTP) was 9 months (range, 1-27). After a median follow-up of 16 months (range 5-54), seven patients are died of disease (DOD) and three alive with disease (AWD). All but one patient discontinued oral chemotherapy because of a PD, whilst one patient stopped chemotherapy after 27 months with a SD. In vitro, gefitinib was synergistic with topotecan and additive with CPA.

CONCLUSION

The GTC combination was well tolerated and the TTP was encouraging. These promising results, also supported by in vitro evidence, should be further confirmed in a phase II study.

Outcome of children with neuroblastoma after progression or relapse. A retrospective study of the Italian neuroblastoma registry

The Italian Neuroblastoma Registry was investigated to describe 781 children with neuroblastoma experiencing tumour recurrence (424 progressions and 357 relapses). Ten-year overall survival (OS) was 6.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.3-10.0) after progression and 14.4% (95% CI 10.5-18.9) after relapse. For both circumstances, OS was better for age at diagnosis <18 months, less advanced International Neuroblastoma Staging System (INSS) stage, normal lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) serum level, normal MYCN gene status (P<0.001) and a non-abdominal primary site (P=0.034 for progression, and P=0.004 for relapses). A local type of recurrence had a significantly better outcome only in case of relapse (P<0.001). Probability of survival increased by era of diagnosis. Survival of children with recurrent neuroblastoma is very poor. A small cohort of patients, mainly represented by children with stages 1 and 2 who underwent local recurrence or developed late relapse may still benefit from further conventional treatment. For the remaining larger proportion of patients, experimental therapies should be proposed.

Inhibition of serine/threonine phosphatase PP2A enhances cancer chemotherapy by blocking DNA damage induced defense mechanisms

A variety of mechanisms maintain the integrity of the genome in the face of cell stress. Cancer cell response to chemotherapeutic and radiation-induced DNA damage is mediated by multiple defense mechanisms including polo-like kinase 1 (Plk-1), protein kinase B (Akt-1), and/or p53 pathways leading to either apoptosis or cell cycle arrest. Subsequently, a subpopulation of arrested viable cancer cells may remain and recur despite aggressive and repetitive therapy. Here, we show that modulation (activation of Akt-1 and Plk-1 and repression of p53) of these pathways simultaneously results in paradoxical enhancement of the effectiveness of cytotoxic chemotherapy. We demonstrate that a small molecule inhibitor, LB-1.2, of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) activates Plk-1 and Akt-1 and decreases p53 abundance in tumor cells. Combined with temozolomide (TMZ; a DNA-methylating chemotherapeutic drug), LB-1.2 causes complete regression of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) xenografts without recurrence in 50% of animals (up to 28 weeks) and complete inhibition of growth of neuroblastoma (NB) xenografts. Treatment with either drug alone results in only short-term inhibition/regression with all xenografts resuming rapid growth. Combined with another widely used anticancer drug, Doxorubicin (DOX, a DNA intercalating agent), LB-1.2 also causes marked GBM xenograft regression, whereas DOX alone only slows growth. Inhibition of PP2A by LB-1.2 blocks cell-cycle arrest and increases progression of cell cycle in the presence of TMZ or DOX. Pharmacologic inhibition of PP2A may be a general method for enhancing the effectiveness of cancer treatments that damage DNA or disrupt components of cell replication.

New therapeutic targets for the treatment of high-risk neuroblastoma

High-risk neuroblastoma remains a major problem in pediatric oncology, accounting for 15% of childhood cancer deaths. Although incremental improvements in outcome have been achieved with the intensification of conventional chemotherapy agents and the addition of 13-cis-retinoic acid, only one-third of children with high-risk disease are expected to be long-term survivors when treated with current regimens. In addition, the cost of cure can be quite high, as surviving children remain at risk for additional health problems related to long-term toxicities of treatment. Further advances in therapy will require the targeting of tumor cells in a more selective and efficient way so that survival can be improved without substantially increasing toxicity. In this review we summarize ongoing clinical trials and highlight new developments in our understanding of the molecular biology of neuroblastoma, emphasizing potential targets or pathways that may be exploitable therapeutically.

Phase I trial of oral irinotecan and temozolomide for children with relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma: a new approach to neuroblastoma therapy consortium study

PURPOSE

Irinotecan and temozolomide have single-agent activity and schedule-dependent synergy against neuroblastoma. Because protracted administration of intravenous irinotecan is costly and inconvenient, we sought to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of oral irinotecan combined with temozolomide in children with recurrent/resistant high-risk neuroblastoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received oral temozolomide on days 1 through 5 combined with oral irinotecan on days 1 through 5 and 8 through 12 in 3-week courses. Daily oral cefixime was used to reduce irinotecan-associated diarrhea.

RESULTS

Fourteen assessable patients received 75 courses. Because neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were initially dose-limiting, temozolomide was reduced from 100 to 75 mg/m(2)/d for subsequent patients. Irinotecan was then escalated from 30 to 60 mg/m2/d. First-course grade 3 diarrhea was dose-limiting in one of six patients treated at the irinotecan MTD of 60 mg/m2/d. Other toxicities were mild and reversible. The median SN-38 lactone area under the plasma concentration versus time curve at this dose was 72 ng . hr/mL. One patient with bulky soft tissue disease had a complete response through six courses. Six additional patients received a median of seven courses (range, three to 22 courses) before progression.

CONCLUSION

This all-oral regimen was feasible and well tolerated in heavily pretreated children with resistant neuroblastoma, and seven (50%) of 14 assessable patients had response or disease stabilization for three or more courses in this phase I trial. SN-38 lactone exposures were similar to those reported with protracted intravenous irinotecan. The dosages recommended for further study in this patient population are temozolomide 75 mg/m2/d plus irinotecan 60 mg/m2/d when given with cefixime.

IFN-beta sensitizes neuroblastoma to the antitumor activity of temozolomide by modulating O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase expression

Although temozolomide has shown clinical activity against neuroblastoma, this activity is likely limited by the DNA repair enzyme O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT). We hypothesized that IFN-beta could sensitize neuroblastoma cells to the cytotoxic effects of temozolomide through its ability to down-regulate MGMT expression. In vitro proliferation of three neuroblastoma cell lines treated with IFN-beta and temozolomide alone or in combination was examined. Antitumor activity was assessed in both localized and disseminated neuroblastoma xenografts using single-agent and combination therapy, with continuous delivery of IFN-beta being established by a liver-targeted adeno-associated virus-mediated approach. Two neuroblastoma cell lines (NB-1691 and SK-N-AS) were found to have high baseline levels of MGMT expression, whereas a third cell line (CHLA-255) had low levels. Temozolomide had little effect on in vitro proliferation of the neuroblastoma cell lines with high MGMT expression, but pretreatment with IFN-beta significantly decreased MGMT expression and cell counts (NB-1691: 36 +/- 3% of control, P = 0.0008; SK-N-AS: 54 +/- 7% control, P = 0.003). In vivo, NB-1691 tumors in CB17-SCID mice treated with the combination of IFN-beta and temozolomide had lower MGMT expression and a significantly reduced tumor burden, both localized [percent initial tumor volume: 2,516 +/- 680% (control) versus 1,272 +/- 330% (temozolomide), P = 0.01; 1,348 +/- 220%, P = 0.03 (IFN-beta); 352 +/- 110%, P = 0.0001 (combo)] and disseminated [bioluminescent signal: control (1.32e10 +/- 6.5e9) versus IFN-beta (2.78e8 +/- 3.09e8), P = 0.025, versus temozolomide (2.06e9 +/- 1.55e9), P = 0.1, versus combination (2.13e7 +/- 7.67e6), P = 0.009]. IFN-beta appears to sensitize neuroblastoma cells to the cytotoxic effects of temozolomide through attenuation of MGMT expression. Thus, IFN-beta and temozolomide may be a useful combination for treating children with this difficult disease.

Recurrent metastatic neuroblastoma followed by myelodysplastic syndrome: possible leukemogenic role of temozolomide

An 8-year old child had a pelvic MYCN-nonamplified neuroblastoma (NB) with retroperitoneal nodal extension. Multi-modality therapy achieved complete remission (CR). Small recurrences confined to left supraclavicular nodes were treated with surgery alone at 4.9, 6.5, 7.5, 9.5, and 12.9 years from diagnosis. Monitoring through 12 months after the last resection showed CR. When she returned 34 months later (16.8 years from diagnosis), she had massive disease in the left neck and upper trunk, without osteomedullary metastases. Salvage therapy featured 11 cycles of temozolomide. She developed myelodysplastic syndrome with 45,XX,der(7)t(7;21) (p15;q11),-21 at age 24 and refused treatment; 19 months later she was transfusion-dependent but her NB remained in CR.

Pediatric phase I and pharmacokinetic study of erlotinib followed by the combination of erlotinib and temozolomide: a Children's Oncology Group Phase I Consortium Study

PURPOSE

We conducted a phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor erlotinib as a single agent and in combination with temozolomide in children with refractory solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Erlotinib was administered orally once daily to cohorts of three to six children for a single 28-day course. Patients then received the combination of daily erlotinib and temozolomide daily for 5 days for all subsequent 28-day courses. An oral erlotinib solution was administered during the dose-finding phase and a tablet formulation was subsequently studied at the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD). Pharmacokinetic studies and ERBB-receptor expression and signaling studies were performed.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients, median age 11.5 years, received erlotinib at doses of 35, 50, 65, 85, or 110 mg/m(2)/d. At 110 mg/m(2)/d, two of four patients had dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) consisting of rash and hyperbilirubinemia, whereas one of six patients developed dose-limiting rash at 85 mg/m(2)/d. The most frequent non-DLTs included diarrhea, rash, and hyperbilirubinemia. The combination of erlotinib and temozolomide was well tolerated. The median apparent erlotinib clearance was 3.1 L/h/m(2) and the median terminal half-life was 8.7 hours. One patient with a neurocytoma had stable disease for 19 months, two patients with neuroblastoma remained on study for 23 and 24 months, and one patient with myoepithelioma had a mixed response.

CONCLUSION

The recommended phase II dose of erlotinib in recurrent pediatric solid tumors is 85 mg/m(2)/d, either alone or in combination with temozolomide.

Targeting methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase in the treatment of neuroblastoma

PURPOSE

The combination of temozolomide and irinotecan has preclinical schedule-dependent synergy against neuroblastoma but is not curative for relapsed high-risk patients. We hypothesized that the DNA repair protein methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) is an important resistance factor, and that inactivation of MGMT would sensitize neuroblastoma cells to these agents.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

MGMT protein expression was assessed in 74 primary neuroblastoma tumors. Growth inhibition assays were done to determine the IC(50) and the extent of synergy observed with various concentrations of temozolomide, irinotecan, and the MGMT-inactivating agent O(6)-benzylguanine, using cultured syngeneic neuroblastoma cells with either low or high levels of MGMT expression. We then assessed efficacy in a mouse xenograft model of metastatic neuroblastoma.

RESULTS

MGMT was expressed by all 74 tumors evaluated. Pretreatment of neuroblastoma cells with O(6)-benzylguanine reduced the IC(50) of temozolomide by 10-fold regardless of level of MGMT expression, and pretreatment with BG followed by temozolomide + irinotecan further reduced the IC(50) in cells with high MGMT expression another 10-fold, to well below clinically achievable concentrations. The combination index was 0.27 to 0.30 for all three drugs in both cell lines, indicating strong synergy. Survival at 100 days for mice with metastatic neuroblastoma was 56% with three-drug treatment, compared with untreated controls (0%, P < 0.001) or temozolomide + irinotecan (10%, P = 0.081).

CONCLUSIONS

MGMT is widely expressed in primary neuroblastoma tumors, and is a relevant therapeutic target. Both in vitro and in vivo studies suggest inactivation of MGMT with O(6)-benzylguanine may increase the activity of temozolomide and irinotecan against neuroblastoma.