Sentinel lymph node sampling and analysis in colon cancer: what is the question?

[The intraoperative study of the sentinel lymph node was made possible through molecular analysis: a new concept and new applications for colon cancer?]

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) is a concept but also a technical possibility that can be studied and applied to almost all organs with cancer. For colorectal cancer surgery, some possibilities of using the SLN are possible, other implausible and some completely new especially aware of possible analysis of SLN by a molecular biology technique. The orientation of dissection or "lymph road mapping" can be designed for this case or the surgeon may want to limit his actions, particularly in patients with a history of colonic surgical resection, to keep the digestive function in maintaining vascular axes considered not involved in the metastatic process. The use of the single analysis of SLN to determine the positive or negative status of the cleaning has failed because of the frequency of false negatives in part to the size of colic advanced cancers at diagnosis. The use of "ultra-stading" by multiple section or exhaustion of the block, can lead to reconsider a stage N0 to N1 as a point, if the analysis technique remains in HES. Unlike the "ultra-stading" by RT- PCR or immunohistochemistry was even more discussed and seems not equivalent in terms of prognosis and therefore no giving formally justification for adjuvant therapy. Currently, a new technique for molecular biology, named "OSNA", allows an analysis of all the SLN in less than 45 minutes. It is therefore possible to obtain during surgery analysis of a node with the same level of information than traditional analysis using HES. If this node is positive and if the strategy in case of positive lymph nodes was determined prior for this patient, it is possible to anticipate this strategy and place after colectomy during the same anesthesia, venous access quickly to start postoperative chemotherapy. This new technique for analyzing lymph applied to the SLN opens a new potential application of this concept in digestive oncology.

Review of histopathological and molecular prognostic features in colorectal cancer

Prediction of prognosis in colorectal cancer is vital for the choice of therapeutic options. Histopathological factors remain paramount in this respect. Factors such as tumor size, histological type and subtype, presence of signet ring morphology and the degree of differentiation as well as the presence of lymphovascular invasion and lymph node involvement are well known factors that influence outcome. Our understanding of these factors has improved in the past few years with factors such as tumor budding, lymphocytic infiltration being recognized as important. Likewise the prognostic significance of resection margins, particularly circumferential margins has been appreciated in the last two decades. A number of molecular and genetic markers such as KRAS, BRAF and microsatellite instability are also important and correlate with histological features in some patients. This review summarizes our current understanding of the main histopathological factors that affect prognosis of colorectal cancer.

Lymph road mapping obtained via blue sentinel node detection to avoid middle colic artery resection for highly selected colon cancer cases: proof of a concept?

BACKGROUND

In theory, perioperative detection of lymph nodes with the injection of isosulfan blue dye should provide lymph road mapping (LRM) able to direct the resection. However, there is no supporting evidence for this theory in cases of colon cancer. We reanalysed all operative reports using the sentinel lymph node technique with blue dye injection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The retrospective study included 140 patients who underwent the sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedure between February 2001 and November 2007, including 70 cases in which the in vivo technique was used. In 8 cases (11%), LRM was used by the surgeon to determine the extent of resection.

RESULTS

In 5 cases, including limited or extended resection, the final pathological stage was II at the end of the follow-up period, and the patients had no recurrent disease. However, findings for 3 cases of stage III cancer were more relevant to the aims of this study. In these 3 patients, one with cancer (T3N1(3/22)) located at the hepatic flexure, and 2 with cancers (T3N2(7/41) and T2N2 (4/15)) at the splenic flexure, the middle colic artery was conserved as a result of LRM information. Of these 3 patients, 1 was alive without disease at 6-year follow-up and 2 at 5-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

LRM obtained via blue sentinel node detection makes it possible to avoid middle colic artery resection for selected colon cancer cases. LRM seems particularly suitable in cases of colonic flexure location or prior colon surgery.

Sentinel node biopsy for the individualization of surgical strategy for cure of early-stage colon cancer

INTRODUCTION

The requirement for nodal analysis currently confounds the oncological propriety of focused purely endoscopic resection for early-stage colon cancer and complicates the evolution of innovative alternatives such as natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and its hybrids. Adjunctive sentinel node biopsy (SNB) deserves consideration as a means of addressing this shortfall.

METHODS

Data from two prospectively maintained databases established for multicentric studies of SNB in colon cancer that employed similar methodologies were pooled to establish technique potency selectively in T1/T2 disease (both overall and under optimized conditions) and to project potential clinical impact.

RESULTS

Of 891 patients with T1-4, M0 intraperitoneal colon cancer, 225 had T1/T2 disease. Sentinel nodes were either not found or were falsely negative in 18 patients with T1/T2 cancers (8%) as compared with 17% (112/646) in those with T3/T4 disease (P = 0.001). Negative predictive value (NPV) in the former exceeded 95%, while sensitivity [including immunohistochemistry (IHC)] was 81%. In the 193 patients with T1/T2 disease recruited from those centers contributing >22 patients, sensitivity was 89% and NPV 97%. Thus, in this cohort, SNB could have correctly prompted localized resection (obviating en bloc mesenteric dissection) in 75% (144) of patients, including 59 with T1 lesions potentially amenable to intraluminal resection alone as their definitive treatment. Forty-four patients (23.4%) would still have conventional resection, leaving three patients (1.6% overall) understaged (11% false-negative rate).

CONCLUSION

These findings support the further investigation of SNB as oncological augment for localized resective techniques. Specific prospective study should pursue this goal.

[Not Available]

M. Pocard, J.-C. Sabourin In theory, the concept of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy can be applied to cancer surgery for all solid cancers. Yet sentinel lymph node biopsy has not become a standard part of gastrointestinal cancer surgery. It has been of value in the assessment of small early-stage gastric cancers, but has only achieved widespread practice in Japan. Studies of SLN biopsy in colon cancer have not shown it to be a reliable predictor of N+ status and therefore don't permit the omission of lymph node dissection in selected cases. On the other hand, as a form of intra-operative lymph node mapping, dye injection of the SLN may demonstrate aberrant lymphatic drainage and could occasionally permit the sparing of a middle colic artery whose sacrifice would otherwise be dictated by standard drainage patterns. SLN biopsy may have prognostic usefulness by demonstrating micrometastases; careful serial sectioning focussed on the SLN may detect nests of metastatic cells on HE staining, thereby converting a tumor from Stage I (TxN0M0) to Stage II (TxN1M0). This finding has been noted in 10-15% of cases. However, the prognostic value of micrometastases detected only by immunohistochemical staining or PCR has not been demonstrated. For cancers of the anal canal, SLN biopsy of inguinal nodes has been tested as a means of establishing the indications for inguinal lymph node dissection.

Could lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy provide oncological providence for local resectional techniques for colon cancer? A review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic resectional techniques for colon cancer are undermined by their inability to determine lymph node status. This limits their application to only those lesions at the most minimal risk of lymphatic dissemination whereas their technical capacity could allow intraluminal or even transluminal address of larger lesions. Sentinel node biopsy may theoretically address this breach although the variability of its reported results for this disease is worrisome.

METHODS

Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were interrogated back to 1999 to identify all publications concerning lymphatic mapping for colon cancer with reference cross-checking for completeness. All reports were examined from the perspective of in vivo technique accuracy selectively in early stage disease (i.e. lesions potentially within the technical capacity of endoscopic resection).

RESULTS

Fifty-two studies detailing the experiences of 3390 patients were identified. Considerable variation in patient characteristics as well as in surgical and histological quality assurances were however evident among the studies identified. In addition, considerable contamination of the studies by inclusion of rectal cancer without subgroup separation was frequent. Indeed such is the heterogeneity of the publications to date, formal meta-analysis to pool patient cohorts in order to definitively ascertain technique accuracy in those with T1 and/or T2 cancer is not possible. Although lymphatic mapping in early stage neoplasia alone has rarely been specifically studied, those studies that included examination of false negative rates identified high T3/4 patient proportions and larger tumor size as being important confounders. Under selected circumstances however the technique seems to perform sufficiently reliably to allow it prompt consideration of its use to tailor operative extent.

CONCLUSION

The specific question of whether sentinel node biopsy can augment the oncological propriety for endoscopic resective techniques (including Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery [NOTES]) cannot be definitively answered at present. Study heterogeneity may account for the variability evident in the results from different centers. Enhanced capacity (perhaps to the level necessary to consider selective avoidance of en bloc mesenteric resection) by its confinement to only early stage disease is plausible although not proven. Specific study of the technique in early stage tumors is clearly essential before proffering this approach.

Sentinel lymph nodes of colorectal carcinoma: reappraisal of 123 cases

AIMS

Results concerning the usefulness of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) in colorectal carcinoma have been discordant. The SLN technique may be used to guide surgical resection (lymph mapping), restrict the lymph node analysis solely to the SLN (accuracy) and upgrade tumor staging when micrometastases are specifically detected in the SLN.

METHODS

The blue dye injection technique was used. Serial sections of the SLNs were analyzed after hematoxylin-eosin (HES) staining.

RESULTS

The SLN technique was tested in 123 patients, successfully in 112/118 (feasibility 95%) (five intraoperative exclusions). On average, twenty lymph nodes (range: 5-74) and two SLNs (range: 1-5) were identified. Lymph mapping was used in 11% of patients to guide surgical resection; the SLN was negative in 14 of 36 N+ patients (39% false-negatives); HES staining enabled detection of micrometastases in 8 of 84 initially N0 patients (10% secondary upgrading to N+).

CONCLUSION

Limiting node analysis to the SLN cannot replace a complete pathology examination of all resected lymph nodes. Careful examination of serial sections of the SLN can however affect therapeutic decision making since staging may be upgraded in up to 10% of initially N0 patients.