Thymidine Phosphorylase and Capecitabine: A Predictive Marker for Therapy Selection?

Current and New Biomarkers for Early Detection, Prognostic Stratification, and Management of Gallbladder Cancer Patients

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is an aggressive disease that shows evident geographic variation and is characterized by a poor prognosis, mainly due to the late diagnosis and ineffective treatment. Genetic variants associated with GBC susceptibility, including polymorphisms within the toll-like receptors TLR2 and TLR4, the cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1), and the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter ABCG8 genes, represent promising biomarkers for the stratification of patients at higher risk of GBC; thus, showing potential to prioritize cholecystectomy, particularly considering that early diagnosis is difficult due to the absence of specific signs and symptoms. Similarly, our better understanding of the gallbladder carcinogenic processes has led to identify several cellular and molecular events that may influence patient management, including HER2 aberrations, high tumor mutational burden, microsatellite instability, among others. Despite these reports on interesting and promising markers for risk assessment, diagnosis, and prognosis; there is an unmet need for reliable and validated biomarkers that can improve the management of GBC patients and support clinical decision-making. This review article examines the most potentially significant biomarkers of susceptibility, diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy selection for GBC patients, highlighting the need to find and validate existing and new molecular biomarkers to improve patient outcomes.

5-Fluorouracil pharmacogenomics: still rocking after all these years?

The 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) metabolic pathway is mainly dependent on the activity of several intracellular enzymes. Among them, four in particular; thymidylate synthase, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and thymidine phosphorylase are considered the key points in determining sensitivity or resistance to this drug. These enzymes are needed to metabolize the drug in its active form (thymidylate phosphorylase) or to drop the concentration of the active drug in the cell (dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase) or both (thymidylate synthase and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase). Several different studies have tried to investigate the relationship between the presence of mutations in these enzymes and a reduced/improved activity of treatment based on 5-FU or its derivatives. In this article, we will focus on the often contradictory results of these studies.

[New perspectives in predicting response to chemotherapy in colorectal cancer]

In the last few years, major advances have been produced in knowledge of the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer, which have led to the development of new drugs for the treatment of this disease. Likewise, molecular markers have been identified that are useful in prognosis. However, decisions on adjuvant therapy in colorectal cancer continue to be based exclusively on histological stage. Distinct markers that can be detected in tumoral tissue may be useful in predicting response to antineoplastic drugs. The present article reviews the possible clinical utility of these markers and their role in decision-making in the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer.

A phase I safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic study of enzastaurin combined with capecitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors

Enzastaurin, an oral inhibitor of protein kinase Cbeta, affects signal transduction associated with angiogenesis, proliferation, and survival. Capecitabine is converted to 5-fluoruracil by thymidine phosphorylase, a putative angiogenic factor. The all-oral combination of the two drugs offers the potential for targeting angiogenesis in capecitabine-sensitive tumors with nonoverlapping toxicities. Patients with advanced cancer initially received single-agent enzastaurin to achieve steady-state concentrations (cycle 1). In subsequent 21-day cycles, enzastaurin was given orally, once daily, on days 1-21 and capecitabine orally, twice daily (b.i.d.), on days 1-14 in three dose-level cohorts. Three dose-escalation cohorts were studied: cohort 1 (n=8), 350 mg of enzastaurin +capecitabine (750 mg/m2 b.i.d.); cohort 2 (n=7), enzastaurin (350 mg)+capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 b.i.d.); cohort 3 (n=12), 525-mg capsules or 500-mg enzastaurin+capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 b.i.d.). Further dose escalation was not pursued because of emerging data that enzastaurin systemic exposure did not increase at doses above 525 mg. Although a traditional toxicity-based maximum tolerated dose was not achieved, the highest dosing cohort represented a biologically relevant dose of enzastaurin, on the basis of preclinical data and correlative pharmacodynamic biomarker assays of protein kinase Cbeta inhibition in peripheral blood mononucleocytes, in combination with a standard dose of capecitabine. For the 500/525-mg dose, ratios of total enzastaurin analyte geometric means (i.e. enzastaurin alone versus enzastaurin with capecitabine) reflected a trend toward decreased enzastaurin exposure, but did not reach statistical significance. The pharmacokinetic parameters of capecitabine with enzastaurin were similar to those previously reported for single-agent capecitabine. The regimen was well tolerated, without any consistent pattern of drug-related grade 3 or grade 4 toxicities being observed. Although no objective tumor responses were documented, five patients maintained stable disease for >or=6 months (range: 6-9.7 months). The recommended phase II dose of this combination, based on the results of this study, is enzastaurin at a daily dose of 500 mg (tablet formulation) and capecitabine (1000 mg/m2, b.i.d.) on days 1-14 every 21 days. Further disease-directed studies are warranted, such as in malignancies in the treatment of which both capecitabine and inhibitors of angiogenesis have previously been benchmarked as being effective.

Anthracyclines and taxanes induce the upregulation of thymidine phosphorylase in breast cancer cells

We have investigated the immunohistochemical expression of thymidine phosphorylase before and after the administration of anthracycline, and/or anthracycline/taxane-based preoperative chemotherapy in a consecutive series of 55 patients with primary operable breast cancer. Pretreatment, large core breast biopsies and the corresponding surgical samples were retrospectively evaluated for thymidine phosphorylase immunoreactivity. Immunohistochemical expression was evaluated on tumor cells (nuclear and cytoplasmic staining) and on stromal cells (cytoplasmic staining). The cytoplasmic expression of thymidine phosphorylase was enhanced in the tumor cells after treatment (P=0.04). An increase in thymidine phosphorylase cytoplasmic tumor expression was observed in 33% (95% confidence interval: 19-50%) of patients after preoperative chemotherapy (P=0.01). No statistically significant nuclear staining changes were observed in response to treatment. Similarly, no significant changes of the enzyme expression were seen in stromal cells. This study provides further evidence that, at least in breast cancer, thymidine phosphorylase is upregulated after anthracycline and/or taxane-containing chemotherapy. Accordingly, it supports the hypothesis of a synergistic effect between thymidine phosphorylase-modulating and thymidine phosphorylase-targeting anticancer agents. Translational studies, specifically designed on the basis of this rationale, are eagerly waited.