Feasibility and efficacy of molecular analysis-directed individualized therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

B Cell Lymphoma 2: A Potential Therapeutic Target for Cancer Therapy

Defects in the apoptosis mechanism stimulate cancer cell growth and survival. B cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) is an anti-apoptotic molecule that plays a central role in apoptosis. Bcl-2 is the founding constituent of the Bcl-2 protein family of apoptosis controllers, the primary apoptosis regulators linked with cancer. Bcl-2 has been identified as being over-expressed in several cancers. Bcl-2 is induced by protein kinases and several signaling molecules which stimulate cancer development. Identifying the important function played by Bcl-2 in cancer progression and development, and treatment made it a target related to therapy for multiple cancers. Among the various strategies that have been proposed to block Bcl-2, BH3-mimetics have appeared as a novel group of compounds thanks to their favorable effects on many cancers within several clinical settings. Because of the fundamental function of Bcl-2 in the regulation of apoptosis, the Bcl-2 protein is a potent target for the development of novel anti-tumor treatments. Bcl-2 inhibitors have been used against several cancers and provide a pre-clinical platform for testing novel therapeutic drugs. Clinical trials of multiple investigational agents targeting Bcl-2 are ongoing. This review discusses the role of Bcl-2 in cancer development; it could be exploited as a potential target for developing novel therapeutic strategies to combat various types of cancers. We further highlight the therapeutic activity of Bcl-2 inhibitors and their implications for the therapeutic management of cancer.

Integrative Analysis Reveals Across-Cancer Expression Patterns and Clinical Relevance of Ribonucleotide Reductase in Human Cancers

Mining cancer-omics databases deepens our understanding of cancer biology and can lead to potential breakthroughs in cancer treatment. Here, we propose an integrative analytical approach to reveal across-cancer expression patterns and identify potential clinical impacts for genes of interest from five representative public databases. Using ribonucleotide reductase (RR), a key enzyme in DNA synthesis and cancer-therapeutic targeting, as an example, we characterized the mRNA expression profiles and inter-component associations of three RR subunit genes and assess their differing pathological and prognostic significance across over 30-types of cancers and their related subtypes. Findings were validated by immunohistochemistry with clinical tissue samples (n = 211) collected from multiple cancer centers in China and with clinical follow-up. Underlying mechanisms were further explored and discussed using co-expression gene network analyses. This framework represents a simple, efficient, accurate, and comprehensive approach for cancer-omics resource analysis and underlines the necessity to separate the tumors by their histological or pathological subtypes during the clinical evaluation of molecular biomarkers.

Dehydrogenase/reductase SDR family member 2 silencing sensitizes an oxaliplatin‑resistant cell line to oxaliplatin by inhibiting excision repair cross‑complementing group 1 protein expression

Oxaliplatin (Oxa)-based chemotherapy is widely used as the first-line treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC). However, Oxa-resistance is common for many postoperative CRC patients. To explore drug resistance in CRC, an Oxa-resistant cell line, HCT116/Oxa, was established from parental HCT116 cells. These Oxa-resistant cells exhibited characteristics of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and a higher migratory capacity than parental cells. Protein profiles of HCT116/Oxa and HCT116 cells were compared using a tandem mass tag-based quantitative proteomics technique. The protein dehydrogenase/reductase SDR family member 2 (DHRS2) was revealed to be highly expressed in HCT116/Oxa cells. Silencing of DHRS2 in HCT116/Oxa cells effectively restored Oxa-sensitivity by suppressing the expression of excision repair cross-complementing group 1 protein via a p53-dependent pathway, and reversed the EMT phenotype. Overall, the suppression of DHRS2 expression may be a promising strategy for the prevention of Oxa-resistance in CRC.

RRM1 predicts clinical outcome of high-and intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients treated with intravesical gemcitabine monotherapy

Background

The expression level of ribonucleotide reductase subunit M1 (RRM1) is closely related to the effect of gemcitabine-based therapy in advanced bladder cancer. However, the value of RRM1 expression in predicting progression-free survival in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients treated with intravesical gemcitabine chemotherapy has not been elucidated.

Methods

This study randomly assigned 162 patients to either the RRM1-known group or the unknown group. We collected cancer tissues from 81 patients to evaluate the mRNA expression of RRM1 by using liquid chip technology. All patients were diagnosed and then treated with intravesical gemcitabine monotherapy immediately after transurethral resection of the bladder tumour (TURBT).

Results

RRM1 expression was high in 21% (17/81) of patients. The RRM1 mRNA level was not correlated with sex, age, weight, performance status, or CUA/EAU risk (p > 0.05). Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer for patients with low RRM1 expression than for patients with high and unknown RRM1 expression (p = 0.009). Additionally, the 1- and 2-year relapse rates also differed according to RRM1 expression level. The 1-year relapse rates for RRM1-low, RRM1-high and RRM1-unknown patients were 0, 17.7 and 6.2% (p = 0.009), while the 2-year relapse rates for these groups were 3.1, 29.4, and 11.1% (p = 0.005), respectively.

Conclusions

This preliminary study showed that low RRM1 expression was associated with longer progression-free survival and lower 1-year/2-year relapse rates in NMIBC patients treated with intravesical gemcitabine monotherapy, despite the need for further verification with large sample sizes and considering more mixed factors and biases.

Prognostic value of ribonucleotide reductase subunit M1 (RRM1) in non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Ribonucleotide reductase subunit 1 (RRM1) is a potential prognostic factor for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study evaluates prognostic value of RRM1 in NSCLC patients by meta-analyzing outcomes reported in literature.

METHOD

Data were acquired from research articles retrieved after literature search in online databases. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted by pooling hazard ratios (HR). Meta-analyses of standardized mean differences (SMD) were used to evaluate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between low and high RRM1 expression groups. Metaregression analyses were conducted to evaluate the factors that could affect prognostic relationship of RRM1 with treatment and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

23 studies (3148 patients) were included. RRM1 expression was not meaningfully associated with prognosis of NSCLC even when the reference (HR = 1) was either low RRM1 expression (0.918 [95% CI 0.833, 1.003]) or high RRM1 expression (0.834 [0.625, 1.043]). OS was significantly longer in low RRM1 expression group compared to high RRM1 expression group (SMD 0.73 [0.36, 1.09]; P < 0.0001). PFS was not significantly different between low and high RRM1 expression groups (SMD 0.08 [-0.29, 0.45]; p = 0.68). Age was inversely associated with HR (p = 0.001) even when reference was low RRMI (p = 0.027) or high RRM1 (p = 0.006). Age was positively associated with OS in both low and high RRM1 groups.

CONCLUSION

In meta-analysis of studies which used gemcitabine-based therapies, higher RRM1 expression is found to associated with shorter OS but not PFS. HR depicting relationship between RRM1 expression and OS/PFS/treatment response could not demonstrate a prognostic role of RRM1 in NSCLC patients.

Feasibility of re-biopsy and EGFR mutation analysis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Background

In cases of EGFR‐tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) failure, re‐biopsy may be useful to understand resistance mechanisms and guide further treatment decisions. However, performing re‐biopsy is challenging because of several hurdles. We assessed the feasibility of re‐biopsy in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in real‐world clinical practice.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and pathologic data of advanced NSCLC patients who experienced disease progression after previous treatment with EGFR‐TKIs at a single tertiary hospital in Korea between January 2014 and December 2016. Re‐biopsy specimens included small biopsy, surgical tissue, or liquid‐based cytology. EGFR mutation was tested using peptide nucleic acid‐mediated clamping PCR.

Results

Of the 230 NSCLC patients that experienced progression after EGFR‐TKI therapy, 105 (45.7%) underwent re‐biopsy. Re‐biopsy was successfully performed in 94 (89.5%) patients, and 11 patients were diagnosed with no malignancy. The complication rate was 8.6%, including seven cases of pneumothorax. EGFR mutation testing was performed on 75 patients using re‐biopsy specimens. Of the 57 patients who had sensitizing mutations at diagnosis, T790M mutations were found in 19 (33.3%), while 38 (66.7%) had no T790M mutation. Multivariate analysis showed that the re‐biopsy group was younger (P = 0.002) and exhibited a previous response to EGFR‐TKIs (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Re‐biopsy in advanced NSCLC is feasible in real world clinical practice, particularly in younger patients and those who achieved a previous response to EGFR‐TKIs.

Quantification and expert evaluation of evidence for chemopredictive biomarkers to personalize cancer treatment

Predictive biomarkers have the potential to facilitate cancer precision medicine by guiding the optimal choice of therapies for patients. However, clinicians are faced with an enormous volume of often-contradictory evidence regarding the therapeutic context of chemopredictive biomarkers.

We extensively surveyed public literature to systematically review the predictive effect of 7 biomarkers claimed to predict response to various chemotherapy drugs: ERCC1-platinums, RRM1-gemcitabine, TYMS-5-fluorouracil/Capecitabine, TUBB3-taxanes, MGMT-temozolomide, TOP1-irinotecan/topotecan, and TOP2A-anthracyclines. We focused on studies that investigated changes in gene or protein expression as predictors of drug sensitivity or resistance. We considered an evidence framework that ranked studies from high level I evidence for randomized controlled trials to low level IV evidence for pre-clinical studies and patient case studies.

We found that further in-depth analysis will be required to explore methodological issues, inconsistencies between studies, and tumor specific effects present even within high evidence level studies. Some of these nuances will lend themselves to automation, others will require manual curation. However, the comprehensive cataloging and analysis of dispersed public data utilizing an evidence framework provides a high level perspective on clinical actionability of these protein biomarkers. This framework and perspective will ultimately facilitate clinical trial design as well as therapeutic decision-making for individual patients.

CT-guided aspiration lung biopsy for EGFR and ALK gene mutation analysis of lung cancer

The present study investigated the rates of detection and the positive rates of computed tomography (CT)-guided aspiration of lung biopsy for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene, and analyzed the relationship between gene mutation and clinical characteristics to improve the rate of related factors of gene detection. The clinical data and CT-guided aspiration biopsy specimen of 250 patients with lung cancer. Data showed that the rate of EGFR gene mutation was 41.2% (103/250) in biopsy specimens of non-small cell lung cancer patients. The rate of EGFR gene mutation of adenocarcinoma (56.6%, P<0.01) was higher than other types of lung cancer. ALK gene mutation of patients in phase IV was obviously higher than that of patients not in phase IV (18.5 and 1.8%, P<0.01). The rate of EGFR gene detection was 83.2% (208/250). The rate of detection of tumor cells >50 was higher. The rate of ALK protein immunohistochemical detection was 87.2%, and the rate of coarse needle biopsy detection was higher than that of the fine needle (91 and 72%, P<0.01), but the positive rate between coarse needle biopsy and fine needle biopsy had no difference (P>0.05). The rate of detection was associated with tumor cell number (P<0.05), and had no correlation with the proportion of tumor cells (P>0.05). The rate of detection of EGFR and ALK genes was associated with tumor cell number and had no correlation with the proportion of tumor cells. The rate of detection is higher when the number of tumor cells is more than 50.

The Challenges of Validating in Precision Medicine: The Case of Excision Repair Cross-Complement Group 1 Diagnostic Testing

Personalized medicine relies upon the successful identification and translation of predictive biomarkers. Unfortunately, biomarker development has often fallen short of expectations. To better understand the obstacles to successful biomarker development, we systematically mapped research activities for a biomarker that has been in development for at least 12 years: excision repair cross-complement group 1 protein (ERCC1) as a biomarker for predicting clinical benefit with platinum-based chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. We found that although research activities explored a wide range of approaches to ERCC1 testing, there was little replication or validation of techniques, and design and reporting of results were generally poor. Our analysis points to problems with coordinating and standardizing research in biomarker development. Clinically meaningful progress in personalized medicine will require concerted efforts to address these problems. In the interim, health care providers should be aware of the complexity involved in biomarker development, cautious about their near-term clinical value, and conscious of applying only validated diagnostics in the clinic.

THE ONCOLOGIST

2017;22:89-96 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: : Many hospitals, policy makers, and scientists have made ambitious claims about the promise of personalizing cancer care. When one uses a case example of excision repair cross-complement group 1 protein-a biomarker that has a strong biological rationale and that has been researched for 12 years-the current research environment seems poorly suited for efficient development of biomarker tests. The findings provide grounds for tempering expectations about personalized cancer care-at least in the near term-and shed light on the current gap between the promise and practice of personalized medicine.

Predictors of chemotherapy efficacy in non-small-cell lung cancer: a challenging landscape

BACKGROUND

Conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy (CCC) is the backbone of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment since decades and still represents a key element of the therapeutic armamentarium. Contrary to molecularly targeted therapies and immune therapies, for which predictive biomarkers of activity have been actively looked for and developed in parallel to the drug development process ('companion biomarkers'), no patient selection biomarker is currently available for CCC, precluding customizing treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed preclinical and clinical studies that assessed potential predictive biomarkers of CCC used in NSCLC (platinum, antimetabolites, topoisomerase inhibitors, and spindle poisons). Biomarker evaluation method, analytical validity, and robustness are described and challenged for each biomarker.

RESULTS

The best-validated predictive biomarkers for efficacy are currently ERCC1, RRM1, and TS for platinum agents, gemcitabine and pemetrexed, respectively. Other potential biomarkers include hENT1 for gemcitabine, class III β-tubulin for spindle poisons, TOP2A expression and CEP17 duplication (mostly studied for predicting anthracyclines efficacy) whose applicability concerning etoposide would deserve further evaluation. However, none of these biomarkers has till now been validated prospectively in an appropriately designed and powered randomised trial, and none of them is currently ready for implementation in routine clinical practice.

CONCLUSION

The search for predictive biomarkers to CCC has been proven challenging. If a plethora of biomarkers have been evaluated either in the preclinical or in the clinical setting, none of them is ready for clinical implementation yet. Considering that most mechanisms of resistance or sensitivity to CCC are multifactorial, a combinatorial approach might be relevant and further efforts are required.

A randomized phase II trial of ERCC1 and RRM1 mRNA expression-based chemotherapy versus docetaxel/carboplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether the selection of first-line chemotherapy based on ERCC1 and RRM1 mRNA expression levels would improve clinical outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eligible patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to the experimental and control arms; the experimental arm received gemcitabine/carboplatin (GC) if ERCC1 and RRM1 expression was low, gemcitabine/vinorelbine (GV) if ERCC1 was high and RRM1 was low, docetaxel/carboplatin (DC) if ERCC1 was low and RRM1 was high, and docetaxel/vinorelbine (DV) if both were high. In the control arm, patients received DC.

RESULTS

This study was prematurely terminated after the futility analysis of 43 progression-free survival (PFS) events. A total of 55 patients (n = 26 in the experimental arm, n = 29 in the control arm) were evaluable for efficacy and toxicity. Nineteen (73.1%) patients were assigned to receive GC, 0 (0.0%) to GV, 4 (15.4%) to DC, and 3 (11.5%) to DV in the experimental arm. The overall response rates were 42.3 and 48.3% in the experimental and control arms, respectively, which were not statistically different (P = 0.657). The median PFS was 5.2 months in the experimental arm and 5.4 months in the control arm (P = 0.286). The median overall survival was 17.4 months in the experimental arm and 12.6 months in the control arm (P = 0.638). The occurrence of grade 3 or higher neutropenia (69.2 vs. 93.1%, P = 0.035) and febrile neutropenia (3.8 vs. 24.1%, P = 0.054) was more common in the control arm.

CONCLUSION

ERCC1 and RRM1 mRNA expression-based chemotherapy did not improve clinical outcomes in advanced NSCLC (NCT01648517).

RRM1, ERCC1 and TS1 Immunofluorescence Expression in Leiomyosarcoma: A Tissue Microarray Study with Clinical Outcome Correlation Analysis

ERCC1, RRM1 and TS1 are reportedly linked to chemotherapy resistance in lung and other cancers. However, there are currently no studies reporting the relationship between these genes and clinical parameters in leiomyosarcomas.

METHOD

This study investigated the expression pattern of ERCC1, RRM1 and TS1 in forty-four leiomyosarcoma samples by the use of tissue microarray (TMA), immunofluorescence and AQUA methods. The results were then analyzed for expression level and correlations were made with clinical outcome to determine their potential prognostic value in leiomyosarcoma.

RESULTS

In the forty-four samples studied, the expression level of these three proteins can be well quantified in the AQUA system and reflected by the AQUA score. RRM1 and ERCC1 expression levels did not show any relationship with overall survival. However, a correlation was found between TS1 expression in the cytoplasm and overall survival. The high expression group had a shorter overall survival time (log-rank p = 0.0498). This trend was confirmed by the Cox proportional hazards model.

DISCUSSION

The poor overall survival of leiomyosarcoma is linked to TS1 cytoplasm expression which may be useful in predicting prognoses of this tumor, methods targeting expression of TS1 may lead to improved overall survival in leiomyosarcoma, though more detailed information regarding treatment information and a larger sample size is needed to confirm this phenomenon.

CITED2 silencing sensitizes cancer cells to cisplatin by inhibiting p53 trans-activation and chromatin relaxation on the ERCC1 DNA repair gene

In this study, we show that silencing of CITED2 using small-hairpin RNA (shCITED2) induced DNA damage and reduction of ERCC1 gene expression in HEK293, HeLa and H1299 cells, even in the absence of cisplatin. In contrast, ectopic expression of ERCC1 significantly reduced intrinsic and induced DNA damage levels, and rescued the effects of CITED2 silencing on cell viability. The effects of CITED2 silencing on DNA repair and cell death were associated with p53 activity. Furthermore, CITED2 silencing caused severe elimination of the p300 protein and markers of relaxed chromatin (acetylated H3 and H4, i.e. H3K9Ac and H3K14Ac) in HEK293 cells. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays further revealed that DNA damage induced binding of p53 along with H3K9Ac or H3K14Ac at the ERCC1 promoter, an effect which was almost entirely abrogated by silencing of CITED2 or p300. Moreover, lentivirus-based CITED2 silencing sensitized HeLa cell line-derived tumor xenografts to cisplatin in immune-deficient mice. These results demonstrate that CITED2/p300 can be recruited by p53 at the promoter of the repair gene ERCC1 in response to cisplatin-induced DNA damage. The CITED2/p300/p53/ERCC1 pathway is thus involved in the cell response to cisplatin and represents a potential target for cancer therapy.

The Evolution of Therapies in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The landscape of advanced non-small lung cancer (NSCLC) therapies has rapidly been evolving beyond chemotherapy over the last few years. The discovery of oncogenic driver mutations has led to new ways in classifying NSCLC as well as offered novel therapeutic targets for anticancer therapy. Targets such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements have successfully been targeted with appropriate tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Other driver mutations such as ROS, MET, RET, BRAF have also been investigated with targeted agents with some success in the early phase clinical setting. Novel strategies in the field of immune-oncology have also led to the development of inhibitors of cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death-1 receptor (PD-1), which are important pathways in allowing cancer cells to escape detection by the immune system. These inhibitors have been successfully tried in NSCLC and also now bring the exciting possibility of long term responses in advanced NSCLC. In this review recent data on novel targets and therapeutic strategies and their future prospects are discussed.

The Evolution of Therapies in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The landscape of advanced non-small lung cancer (NSCLC) therapies has rapidly been evolving beyond chemotherapy over the last few years. The discovery of oncogenic driver mutations has led to new ways in classifying NSCLC as well as offered novel therapeutic targets for anticancer therapy. Targets such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements have successfully been targeted with appropriate tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Other driver mutations such as ROS, MET, RET, BRAF have also been investigated with targeted agents with some success in the early phase clinical setting. Novel strategies in the field of immune-oncology have also led to the development of inhibitors of cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death-1 receptor (PD-1), which are important pathways in allowing cancer cells to escape detection by the immune system. These inhibitors have been successfully tried in NSCLC and also now bring the exciting possibility of long term responses in advanced NSCLC. In this review recent data on novel targets and therapeutic strategies and their future prospects are discussed.

Clinical evaluation of postoperative chemotherapy based on genetic testing in patients with stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer

Background

We performed a retrospective analysis to evaluate whether a postoperative chemotherapy selection method based on four tumoral gene expression tests would improve prognosis in patients with stage IIIA non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after surgery.

Methods

Between January 2007 and July 2011, 148 patients with stage IIIA NSCLC underwent radical lobectomy with four cycles of adjuvant postoperative chemotherapy. Forty‐five patients had tailored treatment plans based on the results of tumoral gene expression tests. The tests consisted of quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction analyses to measure the messenger ribonucleic acid levels of the excision repair cross‐complementing gene 1, ribonucleotide reductase Ml, type III β‐tubulin, and thymidylate synthase genes in tumor tissues. One hundred and three patients received conventional chemotherapy. Disease responses were assessed after two cycles and every three months after the first four cycles of chemotherapy. The one and two‐year survival rates and diesease‐free survival (DFS) rates were recorded, and the adverse effects documented.

Results

The one and two‐year DFS rates in the genetically tested group were better than those in the non‐tested group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The two‐year Kaplan–Meier DFS curve analysis results were significantly better in the genetically tested group (X² = 8.228, P = 0.004). The adverse effects during the treatments were not significantly different (P > 0.05) between the two groups.

Conclusions

The chemotherapy selection method based on four tumoral gene expression tests demonstrated its feasibility to improve the efficacy of adjuvant postoperative chemotherapy and benefit stage IIIA NSCLC patients by yielding better DFS without increasing the adverse effects of chemotherapy.

Predictive models for customizing chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

The backbone of first-line treatment for Epidermal Growth Factor (EGFR) wild-type (wt) advanced Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is the use of a platinum-based chemotherapy combination. The treatment is characterized by great inter-individual variability in outcome. Molecular predictive markers are extremely needed in order to identify patients most likely to benefit from platinum-based treatment and resistant ones, thus optimizing chemotherapy approach in NSCLC. Several components of DNA repair response (DRR) have been investigated as potential predictive markers. Among them, high levels of expression of ERCC1, both at protein and mRNA levels, have been associated with resistance to cisplatin in NSCLC. In addition, low levels of expression of RRM1, a target for gemcitabine, have been associated with improved OS in advanced NSCLC patients treated with cisplatin and gemcitabine. Preclinical data and retrospective analyses showed that BRCA1 is able to induce resistance to cisplatin and sensitivity to antimicrotubule agents. In addition, the mRNA levels of expression of RAP80, encoding for a protein cooperating with BRCA1 in homologous recombination (HR), have demonstrated to further sub-classify low BRCA1 NSCLC tumors, improving the predictive model. On the basis of biological knowledge on DNA repair pathway and recent controversial results from clinical validation of potential molecular markers, integrated analysis of multiple DNA repair components could improve predictive information and pave the way to a new approach to customized chemotherapy clinical trials.

Serpin b3 is associated with poor survival after chemotherapy and is a potential novel predictive biomarker in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

In a previous biomarker discovery project using gene-expression profiling we identified Serpin B3 (SB3) as a predictor of resistance to platinum doublet chemotherapy (PtC) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This independent prospective study was designed to confirm the predictive utility of SB3.

METHODS

SB3 immunohistochemistry was scored by previously validated criteria (score 0 = negative, score 1 = 1%-10% tumor cells positive, score 2 = 11%-50% tumor cells positive, and score 3 = >50% tumor cell positive) in 197 patients with stage IV NSCLC treated with PtC. This provided 80% power to detect a median survival increase from 150 days in patients with an SB3 immunohistochemistry score of 2 or more to 300 days in those with an SB3 score of 0 or 1.

RESULTS

Thirty-six percent of NSCLCs stained positive for SB3. Median survival for SB3 negative/score 0 was 332 days, SB3 positive/score 1 was 268 days, and SB3 positive/score 2 or 3 was 120 days (p = 0.004). Cox proportional hazards analysis demonstrated that SB3 positivity is an independent predictor of survival (hazard ratio = 1.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-2.71; p = 0.001).The disease control rate in SB3 score 0, 1 = 65%, and score of 2 or more = 20 % (p = 0.002), with median survival 306 days (score 0, 1) versus 120 days (score ≥ 2, hazard ratio= 1.71; 95% confidence interval. 1.14-3.10; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

SB3-positive immunohistochemistry score of 2 or more (>10% tumor cells positive) identifies a subgroup of patients with stage IV NSCLC who have a poor survival (median 120 days) when treated with PtC, similar to that estimated for untreated or chemo-refractory stage IV NSCLC. Further prospective qualification using biospecimens from randomized studies is needed, but SB3 seems to be a useful biomarker that identifies a highly resistant subgroup in whom PtC should be avoided.

Biomarker in Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy for Urinary Bladder Cancer

The treatment of metastasized bladder cancer has been evolving during recent years. Cisplatin based chemotherapy combinations are still gold standard in the treatment of advanced and metastasized bladder cancer. But new therapies are approaching. Based to this fact biological markers will become more important for decisions in bladder cancer treatment. A systematic MEDLINE search of the key words "cisplatin", "bladder cancer", "DNA marker", "protein marker", "methylation biomarker", "predictive marker", "prognostic marker" has been made. This review aims to highlight the most relevant clinical and experimental studies investigating markers for metastasized transitional carcinoma of the urothelium treated by cisplatin based regimens.

Correlation Analysis and Prognostic Impact of (18)F-FDG PET and Excision Repair Cross-Complementation Group 1 (ERCC-1) Expression in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between [(18)]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) uptake and excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC-1) expression and to evaluate the prognostic effect of these two factors in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 212 patients with resectable NSCLC who underwent FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan for cancer staging and ERCC-1 expression analysis between January 2008 to December 2011. All patients were then followed-up for survival analysis. Semiquantitative evaluation of ERCC-1 was performed with the H-scoring system and was correlated with maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of NSCLC. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate for FDG uptake and ERCC-1 expression predicting overall survival.

RESULTS

In 212 patients (139 male, median age 68 ± 9.11), 112 patients had ERCC-positive tumors and 100 patients had ERCC-negative tumors. There was no significant difference in SUVmax between ERCC-1-positive tumors (8.02 ± 5.40) and ERCC-1-negative tumors (7.57 ± 6.56, p = 0.584). All patients were followed-up for a median of 40.5 months (95 % confidence interval [CI], 38.5-42.2 months). Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis for all patients showed that both ERCC-1 expression (hazard ratio [HR], 2.78; 95 % CI, 1.20-6.47) and FDG uptake (HR, 4.50; 95 % CI, 2.07-9.77) independently predicted overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

We have found no statistical correlation between FDG uptake and ERCC-1 expression in NSCLC. However, both higher FDG uptake and positive ERCC-1 expression are independent predictive markers of prognosis, suggesting that both should be obtained during patient workup.

Feasibility and clinical impact of re-biopsy in advanced non small-cell lung cancer: a prospective multicenter study in a real-world setting (GFPC study 12-01)

OBJECTIVES

When advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) progresses during first-line treatment, re-biopsy may be indicated to detect a possible new biological profile (comparison to initial status, emergence of resistance biomarkers, or assessment of new biomarkers). The aim of this pragmatic prospective multicenter study was to assess the feasibility and clinical utility of re-biopsy in advanced NSCLC in a real-world setting.

METHODS

The main inclusion criteria were advanced NSCLC with an indication for repeat biopsy identified by the patient's clinician. The primary outcome was the percentage of successful procedures. Secondary outcomes were the type of procedure, new biological status, tolerability of the procedure, and clinical utility (treatment modification).

RESULTS

From May 2012 to May 2013, 18 centers enrolled 100 patients (males: 44%; median age: 64.8 years; PS 0/1: 88%; adenocarcinoma: 89%; EGFR mutated: 50%; no initial biological profile: 16.4%). Re-biopsy was not possible in 19.5% of cases and provided no or too few tumor cells in 25.6% of cases. Repeat biopsy was useful for guiding treatment in 30.4% (25/82) of cases. Complications were infrequent (2 cases of moderate bleeding and 1 case of pneumothorax).

CONCLUSION

Re-biopsy of advanced NSCLC is feasible in the real-world setting, with acceptable adverse events. Guidelines are needed on the indications of re-biopsy, the choice of procedure, the sampling site, and laboratory analysis.

Ribonucleotide reductase and cancer: biological mechanisms and targeted therapies

Accurate DNA replication and repair is essential for proper development, growth and tumor-free survival in all multicellular organisms. A key requirement for the maintenance of genomic integrity is the availability of adequate and balanced pools of deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs), the building blocks of DNA. Notably, dNTP pool alterations lead to genomic instability and have been linked to multiple human diseases, including mitochondrial disorders, susceptibility to viral infection and cancer. In this review, we discuss how a key regulator of dNTP biosynthesis in mammals, the enzyme ribonucleotide reductase (RNR), impacts cancer susceptibility and serves as a target for anti-cancer therapies. Because RNR-regulated dNTP production can influence DNA replication fidelity while also supporting genome-protecting DNA repair, RNR has complex and stage-specific roles in carcinogenesis. Nevertheless, cancer cells are dependent on RNR for de novo dNTP biosynthesis. Therefore, elevated RNR expression is a characteristic of many cancers, and an array of mechanistically distinct RNR inhibitors serve as effective agents for cancer treatment. The dNTP metabolism machinery, including RNR, has been exploited for therapeutic benefit for decades and remains an important target for cancer drug development.

Do hENT1 and RRM1 predict the clinical benefit of gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer?

Gemcitabine is a nucleoside analog that is indicated in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. In order to provide a better use of this drug, the search for immunohistological markers is a hot topic in the field of pancreatic cancer. In particular, the use of nucleoside transporter hENT1 and the intracellular target of gemcitabine RRM1 are current subjects for discussion. We have analyzed the majority of studies of hENT1 and RRM1 on pancreatic cancer, and will discuss the further directions that might be followed in order to integrate these proteins in routine clinical practice. The data that is currently available would benefit from the completion of well-designed randomized trials in order to confirm the clinical value of hENT1 and RRM1 as biomarkers in pancreatic cancer patients.

Nucleotide excision repair: why is it not used to predict response to platinum-based chemotherapy?

Platinum based therapy is one of the most effectively used chemotherapeutic treatments for cancer. The mechanism of action of platinum compounds is to damage DNA and drive cells into apoptosis. The most commonly used platinum containing agents are cis-diammine-dichloroplatinum (II)], more commonly known as cisplatin, its analogue carboplatin, and oxaliplatin. Cisplatin is used to treat a wide variety of tumours such as ovarian, testicular, head and neck and non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). In addition, it forms the basis of most combined treatment regimes. Despite this, cisplatin and its analogues are extremely toxic and although some patients benefit substantially from treatment, a large proportion suffer the toxic side effects without any therapeutic benefit. Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a versatile DNA repair system that recognises DNA damage induced by platinum based therapy. For many years the components of the NER pathway have been studied to determine mRNA and protein expression levels in response or resistance to cisplatin in many forms of cancer; particularly testicular, ovarian and NSCLCs. Despite the consistent finding that over or under expression of subsets of NER proteins and mRNA highly correlate with response to cisplatin, the translation of these findings into the clinical setting has not been forthcoming. This review summarises the results of previous investigations into NER in cisplatin response and clinical trials where the expression of NER proteins were compared to the response to platinum therapies in treatment.

Small molecule inhibitors of bcl-2 family proteins for pancreatic cancer therapy

Pancreatic cancer (PC) has a complex etiology and displays a wide range of cellular escape pathways that allow it to resist different treatment modalities. Crucial signaling molecules that function downstream of the survival pathways, particularly at points where several of these pathways crosstalk, provide valuable targets for the development of novel anti-cancer drugs. Bcl-2 family member proteins are anti-apoptotic molecules that are known to be overexpressed in most cancers including PC. The anti-apoptotic machinery has been linked to the observed resistance developed to chemotherapy and radiation and therefore is important from the targeted drug development point of view. Over the past ten years, our group has extensively studied a series of small molecule inhibitors of Bcl-2 against PC and provide solid preclinical platform for testing such novel drugs in the clinic. This review examines the efficacy, potency, and function of several small molecule inhibitor drugs targeted to the Bcl-2 family of proteins and their preclinical progress against PC. This article further focuses on compounds that have been studied the most and also discusses the anti-cancer potential of newer class of Bcl-2 drugs.

Strategies for improving outcomes in NSCLC: a look to the future

Advances in the management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) over the past 30 years have led to small increases in 5-year survival rates across Europe, though further improvements may require new treatment strategies. In order to improve efficiency and reduce the cost of development, future trials for new targeted agents in NSCLC should aim to recruit patients on the basis of tumour biology rather than clinical characteristics. However, identification of predictive biomarkers is required to maximise the benefits of new approaches and expedite the drug development process. Nevertheless, the NSCLC landscape is changing rapidly, and recent improvements in our understanding of the molecular biology of the disease will help in the identification of novel targeted agents as well as assisting in the development of personalised strategies for the numerous small subsets of defined NSCLC. Progress in imaging and treatment delivery is also likely to improve outcomes for patients with the disease. This article outlines recent progress in the treatment of NSCLC, identifies current challenges and describes proposals for improving the future management of the disease. It is hoped that implementation of some of these strategies will go some way to improving the outlook for patients with NSCLC.

Customizing chemotherapy in thoracic malignancies based on ERCC1 expression

SUMMARY Platinum-based chemotherapy regimens using cisplatin or carboplatin are the cornerstones of treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), small-cell lung cancer and malignant pleural mesothelioma. Despite being standard regimens of choice in the majority of patients without oncogene driver mutations, the activity obtained by individual patients varies considerably. Hence, biomarkers such as ERCC1 are needed to predict sensitivity to drugs, which has been explored as a predictor for platinum sensitivity in thoracic malignancies, mostly in the case of NSCLC. ERCC1 may be measured by mRNA activity; however, most studies have examined protein expression via immunohistochemistry. High ERCC1 expression has been a good prognostic factor in resected NSCLC patients who are not receiving chemotherapy, while it has been an adverse predictor for the effect of cisplatin or carboplatin. The latter has also been shown in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Heterogeneous distribution of ERCC1 within tumors may be a source of discordance in the results obtained in various studies. Adding to the discordance may be the fact that there are four isoforms of ERCC1 and seemingly only one of these accounts for cisplatin sensitivity. It is possible that the antibodies used may be equally specific for the same isoforms, which contributes to the heterogeneity of results, in addition to the contribution from immunohistochemistry cutoff levels. Robust evidence in support of the use of ERCC1 to select treatment on an individual patient basis is lacking, and such results from ongoing trials are eagerly awaited in order to improve the possibilities for individualized chemotherapy with improved outcomes.

Randomized international phase III trial of ERCC1 and RRM1 expression-based chemotherapy versus gemcitabine/carboplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

We assessed whether chemotherapy selection based on in situ ERCC1 and RRM1 protein levels would improve survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to the trial's experimental arm, which consisted of gemcitabine/carboplatin if RRM1 and ERCC1 were low, docetaxel/carboplatin if RRM1 was high and ERCC1 was low, gemcitabine/docetaxel if RRM1 was low and ERCC1 was high, and docetaxel/vinorelbine if both were high. In the control arm, patients received gemcitabine/carboplatin. The trial was powered for a 32% improvement in 6-month progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Of 331 patients registered, 275 were eligible. The median number of cycles given was four in both arms. A tumor rebiopsy specifically for expression analysis was required in 17% of patients. The median time from informed consent to expression analysis was 11 days. We found no statistically significant differences between the experimental arm and the control arm in PFS (6.1 months v 6.9 months) or overall survival (11.0 months v 11.3 months). A subset analysis revealed that patients with low levels for both proteins who received the same treatment in both treatment arms had a statistically better PFS (P = .02) in the control arm (8.1 months) compared with the experimental arm (5.0 months).

CONCLUSION

This demonstrates that protein expression analysis for therapeutic decision making is feasible in newly diagnosed patients with advanced-stage NSCLC. A tumor rebiopsy is safe, required in 17%, and acceptable to 89% (47 of 53) of patients.

Simulating the contribution of a biospecimen and clinical data repository in a phase II clinical trial: A value of information analysis

The potential contributions of a centralized data warehouse or repository in clinical research include the expedited accrual of subjects for phase II trials. Understanding the contribution of data warehouses that integrate clinical, biospecimen, and molecular data for the conduct of clinical trials is essential to inform private and public decisions on resource allocation and investment. We conducted a value of information analysis using data from recent trials at the Moffitt Cancer Center and simulated the potential reductions in trial size due to possible alternative scenarios of expedited accrual. In this study, we compared alternative data sets using a single model to assess value of information. Our findings suggest that the reductions in trial size range from 0% to 43%, depending on the amount of censoring in overall survival. The ability to expedite the accrual of patients for clinical trial studies using large data repositories that store data on inclusion/exclusion criteria and response to standard of care therapies demonstrated significant improvement in reducing the number of subjects needed to achieve similar end-results, as evaluated using value of information analysis with a limited number of parameters and a parsimonious model of overall survival.

ERCC1 and RRM1: ready for prime time?

The quest for markers of sensitivity to cytotoxic agents has been ongoing for decades. In non-small-cell lung cancer, platinum compounds represent the cornerstone of systemic therapy. They target DNA and induce damage that cancer cells struggle to overcome. Somatic excision repair cross-complementing rodent repair deficiency, complementation group 1 (ERCC1), and ribonucleotide reductase M1 (RRM1) expression levels have been extensively explored as markers of DNA repair capacity in tumor cells. Although low ERCC1 and/or RRM1 expression is generally associated with sensitivity to platinum, the results published in retrospective and prospective studies are not always consistent. Against this background, we will examine in this review the function of these two biomarkers as well as the tools available for their assessment and the associated technical issues. Their prognostic and predictive values will be summarized and considered in terms of customizing systemic therapy according to biomarker (ERCC1 and RRM1) expression levels. We will also discuss why the use of both markers should at this point be restricted to clinical research and underline that functional readouts of DNA repair will help boost future strategies for biomarker discovery in the field.

CHFR protein expression predicts outcomes to taxane-based first line therapy in metastatic NSCLC

PURPOSE

Currently, there is no clinically validated test for the prediction of response to tubulin-targeting agents in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we investigated the significance of nuclear expression of the mitotic checkpoint gene checkpoint with forkhead and ringfinger domains (CHFR) as predictor of response and overall survival with taxane-based first-line chemotherapy in advanced stage NSCLC.

METHODS

We studied a cohort of 41 patients (median age 63 years) with advanced NSCLC treated at the Atlanta VAMC between 1999 and 2010. CHFR expression by immunohistochemistry (score 0-4) was correlated with clinical outcome using chi-square test and Cox proportional models. A cutoff score of "3" was determined by receiver operator characteristics analysis for "low" CHFR expression. Results were validated in an additional 20 patients who received taxane-based chemotherapy at Emory University Hospital and the Atlanta VAMC.

RESULTS

High expression (score = 4) of CHFR is strongly associated with adverse outcomes: the risk for progressive disease after first-line chemotherapy with carboplatin-paclitaxel was 52% in patients with CHFR-high versus only 19% in those with CHFR-low tumors (P = 0.033). Median overall survival was strongly correlated with CHFR expression status (CHFR low: 9.9 months; CHFR high: 6.2 months; P = 0.002). After multivariate adjustment, reduced CHFR expression remained a powerful predictor of improved overall survival (HR = 0.24; 95% CI, 0.1-0.58%; P = 0.002). In the validation set, low CHFR expression was associated with higher likelihood of clinical benefit (P = 0.03) and improved overall survival (P = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

CHFR expression is a novel predictive marker of response and overall survival in NSCLC patients treated with taxane-containing chemotherapy.

Predictive impact of RRM1 protein expression on vinorelbine efficacy in NSCLC patients randomly assigned in a chemotherapy phase III trial

BACKGROUND

Platinum-based doublets (PBDs) remain the cornerstone of treatment in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and may include gemcitabine. A biomarker predicting sensitivity to this antimetabolite would represent a major step forward. Accordingly, we explored the predictive role of ribonucleotide reductase subunit M (RRM1) in advanced NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 443 patients were randomly assigned to regimen A [paclitaxel (Taxol) and cisplatin with gemcitabine] or regimen B (cisplatin and vinorelbine). Immunohistochemical evaluation of RRM1 was correlated to clinical end-points.

RESULTS

A total of 261 (58.9%) patients had representative tissue samples for RRM1 evaluation. Disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were substantially improved in patients with RRM-negative (neg) tumors receiving regimen B when compared with patients with RRM-positive (pos) tumors (68.8% versus 31.2%, P = 0.046, 6.90 months versus 3.93 months, P = 0.000 and 11.57 months versus 7.4 months, P = 0.002, respectively). Interaction analysis between RRM1-neg status and adenocarcinomas yielded a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.36 for death (P = 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

RRM1 protein expression was without any predictive impact in patients treated with cisplatin, paclitaxel and gemcitabine. Surprisingly, the predictive power was demonstrated in the cisplatin and vinorelbine arm and may suggest that RRM1 is involved in vinorelbine sensitivity warranting further research.

Individualized Chemotherapy in Advanced NSCLC Patients Based on mRNA Levels of BRCA1 and RRM1

OBJECTIVE

Experimental evidence suggests that the overexpression of breast cancer-specific tumor suppressor protein 1 (BRCA1) gene enhances sensitivity to docetaxel and resistance to cisplatin and ribonucleotide reductase M1 (RRM1) gene overexpression enhances resistance to gemcitabine. To further examine the effect of BRCA1 and RRM1 mRNA levels on outcome in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we performed this non-randomized phase II clinical trial which tested the hypothesis that customized therapy would confer improved outcome over non-customized therapy.

METHODS

RNA was isolated from fresh tumor tissue. Patients received chemotherapy regimen based on their BRCA1 and RRM1 mRNA levels: both low-cisplatin plus gemcitabine (GP); both high-vinorelbine plus cisplatin (NP); BRCA1 low and RRM1 high-cisplatin plus docetaxel (TP); BRCA1 high and RRM1 low-vinorelbine plus gemcitabine (GN).

RESULTS

From Dec 2005 to Nov 2008, 94 metastatic and locally advanced NSCLC patients from our institute were enrolled in this study. The median age was 58 years old. Among them, 21 patients received GP, 30 patients received TP and 43 patients received NP chemotherapy. GP group had a higher response rate, and longer median time to progression (TTP) and median overall survival (OS) time than the other 2 groups. The response rates in the GP, TP and NP groups were 42.9%, 36.7% and 27.9%, respectively (P=0.568). The median TTP was 5.6, 5.0, 4.8 months (P=0.975), respectively, and the median OS time was 12.5, 11.0, 9.7 months (P=0.808), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Chemotherapy customized according to BRCA1 and RRM1 expression levels is associated with higher response rate and longer TTP and OS time in the GP group. This suggests that BRCA1 and RRM1 mRNA levels could be used as biomarkers in individual therapy in NSCLC.

Malignant pleural effusion: tumor-host interactions unleashed

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) poses a significant clinical problem. Current nonetiologic management is suboptimal in terms of efficacy and safety. In light of recent research progress, we propose herein a new view of MPE development, which may rapidly translate into meaningful changes in therapeutics. In addition to tumor-induced impairment of pleural fluid drainage, pertinent findings point toward another pathway to MPE formation: a vicious loop of interactions between pleural-based tumor cells and the host vasculature and immune system that results in increased net fluid production via enhanced plasma extravasation into the pleural space. The ability of tumor cells to trigger this cascade likely rests on a specific and distinct transcriptional repertoire, which results in important vasoactive events in the pleural space. Although the characterization of tumor-derived factors responsible for MPE development is in the making, an additional, indirect path to MPE was recently demonstrated: tumor cells recruit and co-opt host cells and mediators, which, in turn, amplify tumor cell-primed fluid leakage and impact tumor cell functions. Importantly, recent evidence suggests that the biologic events that culminate in clinical MPE are likely amenable to therapeutic inhibition and even prevention. In this perspective, the scientific basis for an update of current concepts of MPE formation is highlighted. Key questions for future research are posed. Finally, a vision for novel, effective, safe, and convenient treatment modalities that can be offered to outpatients with MPE is set forth.

ERCC1 expression as a prognostic and predictive factor in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

It is hypothesized that high expression of the excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) gene might be a positive prognostic factor, but predict decreased sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy. Results from the published data are inconsistent. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship between ERCC1 and the prognosis and predictive response to chemotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a meta-analysis was performed. An electronic search of the PubMed and Embase database was performed. Hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) was pooled in early stage patients received surgery alone to analyze the prognosis of ERCC1 on NSCLC. HRs for OS in patients received surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy and in patients received palliative chemotherapy and relative risk (RR) for overall response to chemotherapy were aggregated to analyze the prediction of ERCC1 on NSCLC. The pooled HR indicated that high ERCC1 levels were associated with longer survival in early stage patients received surgery alone (HR, 0.69; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.58-0.83; P = 0.000). There was no difference in survival between high and low ERCC1 levels in patients received surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.93-2.12; P = 0.106). However, high ERCC1 levels were associated with shorter survival and lower response to chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients received palliative chemotherapy (HR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.39-2.22; P = 0.000; RR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.64-0.93; P = 0.007; respectively). The meta-analysis indicated that high ERCC1 expression might be a favourable prognostic and a drug resistance predictive factor for NSCLC.

Personalized therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: which drug for which patient?

The elucidation of the molecular alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the development of molecularly targeted agents have permanently shifted NSCLC therapy to a personalized approach. In the metastatic setting, the addition of the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody, bevacizumab, to chemotherapy improves overall survival. The oral epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors, gefitinib and erlotinib, prolong progression-free survival in patients selected for the presence of an EGFR activating mutation. The monoclonal antibody to EGFR, cetuximab, improves survival in patients with metastatic NSCLC, and the inhibitor of the echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4-anaplastic lymphoma kinase (EML4-ALK) fusion protein, crizotinib, has resulted in an unprecedented overall survival advantage in patients harboring the EML4-ALK translocation. In the adjuvant setting, gefitinib has not been shown to improve patient survival outcomes; however, there are several ongoing clinical trials in the adjuvant setting evaluating the role of erlotinib, bevacizumab, and the MAGE-A3 and MUC1 vaccines. The realm of personalized lung cancer therapy also includes the study of chemotherapy selected on the basis of the pharmacogenetic profile of a patient's tumor. Several ongoing clinical trials in both the metastatic and adjuvant settings are studying the excision repair cross-complementing group 1 (ERCC1) protein, the ribonucleotide reductase subunit 1 (RRM1) protein, thymidylate synthase, and BRCA1 as predictors of chemotherapy response. This review will outline the current state of the art of personalized NSCLC therapy.

A decade of advances in treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The last decade has heralded a paradigm shift in the evaluation and treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). No longer are patients with NSCLC considered a homogeneous population treated in the same way; rather, clinical characteristics, histology, and an expanding array of molecular markers are increasingly being used to individualize therapy. Both histology and tumor epidermal growth factor receptor mutational status currently have firmly established roles in determining initial and salvage therapy for advanced NSCLC. Several other biomarkers are the focus of ongoing prospective randomized clinical trials customizing both traditional chemotherapy and newer molecularly targeted agents.

Expression of RRM1 and its association with resistancy to gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Gemcitabine has high activity against nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The level of ribonucleotide reductase subunit M1 (RRM1) expression is closely related to the efficacy of gemcitabine on non-small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer. However, the expression of RRM1 and its association with sensitivity to gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in advanced NPC is not known. In this study, we retrospectively collected 48 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded NPC tissues to evaluate the expression of RRM1 using immunohistochemistry. All patients were diagnosed and treated with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. RRM1 expression was positive in 17(35%) patients. RRM1 expression was not associated with sex, age, performance status, WHO histological type, number of distant metastases, previous treatment, or cycles of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy(P> 0.05). The progression-free survival of the RRM1-positive group was shorter than that of the RRM1-negative group (5 months vs. 7 months, P = 0.036), and the response rate of the RRM1-positive group was somewhat lower than that of the RRM1-negative group (51.6% vs. 35.3%, P = 0.278). There was no significant difference in median survival between the RRM1-positive and RRM1-negative groups (22 months vs. 19 months, P = 0.540). Our results show that RRM1-negative expression is related with longer progression-free survival in advanced NPC patients treated with gemcitabine-based regimens.

[Therapy selection in patients with advanced bladder cancer. Is molecular biology helpful?]

The prognosis of patients with advanced bladder cancer is still limited by a high rate of systemic progression. In addition to extended lymph node dissection, perioperative chemotherapy has been shown to improve the outcome after cystectomy. The role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies are still a matter of controversial debate: there is an overtreatment of patients on the one hand but other patients are undertreated and do not receive chemotherapy because the progression risk may be underestimated on the basis of clinical and histopathological parameters. Improved cure rates can be achieved by new biomarkers defining the individual risk of systemic progression and predicting the response probability of the individual patient.A number of recent publications demonstrated that molecular signatures of the primary tumor can define the metastatic risk or correlate with chemotherapy response. Furthermore, it is essential to understand resistance mechanisms and to develop new targeted therapies based on knowledge of bladder tumor biology. This paper gives an overview concerning the role of molecular biology for therapy decision-making.

Association of EGFR mutation or ALK rearrangement with expression of DNA repair and synthesis genes in never-smoker women with pulmonary adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement may predict the outcome of targeted drug therapy and also are associated with the efficacy of chemotherapy in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The authors of this report investigated the relation of EGFR mutation or ALK rearrangement status and the expression of DNA repair or synthesis genes, including excision repair cross-complementing 1 (ERCC1), ribonucleotide reductase subunit M1 (RRM1), thymidylate synthetase (TS), and breast cancer-early onset (BRCA1), as a potential explanation for these observations.

METHODS

In total, 104 resected lung adenocarcinomas from women who were nonsmokers were analyzed concurrently for EGFR mutations, ALK rearrangements, and mRNA expression of the ERCC1, RRM1, TS, and BRCA1 genes. EGFR mutations were detected with a proprietary detection kit, ALK rearrangements were detected by polymerase chain reaction analysis, and genetic mRNA expression was detected by real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis.

RESULTS

Of 104 patients, 73 (70.2%) had EGFR mutations, and 10 (9.6%) had ALK rearrangements. ERCC1 mRNA levels in patients who had EGFR mutations were 3.44 ± 1.94 × 10(-3) , which were significantly lower than the levels in patients who were positive for ALK rearrangements and in patients who were negative for both biomarkers (4.60 ± 1.95 × 10(-3) and 4.95 ± 2.33 × 10(-3) , respectively; P = .010). However, TS mRNA levels were significantly lower in patients who had EGFR mutations (1.15 ± 1.38 × 10(-3) vs 2.69 ± 3.97 × 10(-3) ; P = .006) or ALK rearrangements (1.21 ± 0.78 × 10(-3) vs 2.69 ± 3.97 × 10(-3) ; P = .020) than in patients who were negative for both biomarkers.

CONCLUSIONS

NSCLC specimens that harbored activating EGFR mutations were more likely to express low ERCC1 and TS mRNA levels, whereas patients with NSCLC who had ALK rearrangement were more likely to express low TS mRNA levels.

The potential of exploiting DNA-repair defects for optimizing lung cancer treatment

The tumor genome is commonly aberrant as a consequence of mutagenic insult and incomplete DNA repair. DNA repair as a therapeutic target has recently received considerable attention owing to the promise of drugs that target tumor-specific DNA-repair enzymes and potentiate conventional cytotoxic therapy through mechanism-based approaches, such as synthetic lethality. Treatment for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) consists mainly of platinum-based chemotherapy regimens and improvements are urgently needed. Optimizing treatment according to tumor status for DNA-repair biomarkers, such as ERCC1, BRCA1 or RRM1, could predict response to platinum, taxanes and gemcitabine-based therapies, respectively, and might improve substantially the response of individual patients' tumors. Finally, recent data on germline variation in DNA-repair genes may also be informative. Here, we discuss how a molecular and functional DNA-repair classification of NSCLC may aid clinical decision making and improve patient outcome.

Individualized therapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer: emerging trends and challenges

Non-small cell lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Efforts to improve outcomes have led to a greater understanding of the predictive and prognostic value of histologic and molecular characteristics of individual tumors. In standard practice, biopsy specimens are examined first on a histologic level, then on a molecular level with the recognition that both histologic subtype and gene expression profile can guide treatment decisions and have a profound effect on clinical outcomes. Epidermal growth factor activation mutations were among the first biomarkers shown to have therapeutic implications, and levels of gene expression for an array of other biomarkers are being evaluated in clinical trials. Ongoing studies underscore the need to implement molecular and histologic screening as part of routine clinical practice. To achieve an integration of clinical, histologic, and molecular parameters when making treatment decisions, collaboration between oncologists and pathologists is essential.