Adjuvant vinorelbine and cisplatin in elderly patients: National Cancer Institute of Canada and Intergroup Study JBR.10

Efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in treatment of elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients with advanced NSCLC ≥70 years old who received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. According to age, the patient were stratified as follows: 70-75 years old, 76-80 years old, and >80 years old. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis, and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to analyze the correlation between different clinical characteristics and survival.

RESULTS

A total of 58 elderly patients with advanced non-small cell cancer were enrolled in this study. Patients aged 70-75, 76-80, and >80 years old were 32, 19, and 7, respectively. For the all, median OS was 17.0 months, and PFS was 7.0 months. PFS and OS did not differ according to age (P = 0.396, 0.054, respectively). Univariate analysis showed that PS of 0-1, stage III, first-line therapy and irAEs were associated with longer PFS, and PS of 0-1, stage III, and first-line therapy were associated with longer OS. Multivariate analysis showed that patients with stage III had longer PFS. PFS and OS of patients with PS ≥ 2 were significantly shorter than those of patients with PS of 0-1.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present real-world retrospective cohort, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors are effective and well tolerated in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. Immunotherapy should be actively used as early as possible in older patients advanced NSCLC.

The Role of Adjuvant Chemotherapy before Osimertinib in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutant Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Communicating It to Patients

Patients with radically resected stage II and III NSCLC are exposed to a high risk of disease recurrence. Thus, adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy is routinely offered to this patient population, although it results in an absolute increase in 5-year survival rate of only 4%. This modest improvement in survival rate makes it challenging to communicate to our patients about the decision to be treated with adjuvant chemotherapy or not. Nowadays, the decision to administer adjuvant chemotherapy or not in resected NSCLC is almost never completely shared with patients because its role is very difficult to explain. The risk-benefit ratio becomes clearly unfavourable in elderly and unfit patients. Recently, the phase III ADAURA trial demonstrated a clinically significant disease-free survival and overall survival benefit with adjuvant osimertinib (with or without adjuvant chemotherapy) versus a placebo in EGFR-mutated stage IB-IIIA resected NSCLC. In this patient population, the decision to administer chemotherapy or not is much more challenging given the great benefit offered by osimertinib alone. Thus, it is time now to improve our communication tools to explain the role of adjuvant chemotherapy to our patients, especially in the EGFR-mutated population, in order to undertake real shared decision making in a clinical context in which the opportunity to administer toxic chemotherapy is debatable and subjective.

Efficacy of Adjuvant First-Generation TKIs versus Chemotherapy in Patients with Completely Resected EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The use of adjuvant first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKIs) in patients with resected EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. Therefore, we performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to investigate the overall survival (OS) in patients with resected NSCLC.

METHODS

Relevant studies were identified from the PubMed and EMBASE databases, and pooled hazard risks were obtained by random-effects models.

RESULTS

Three prospective phase III and one phase II randomized controlled trials were identified, including a total of 839 patients who had undergone resection of EGFR-sensitive mutation in our analysis, 429 of whom received adjuvant first-generation TKIs therapy. For all patients with complete resection, adjuvant first-generation TKIs therapy was associated with improved disease-free survival (DFS) [hazard ratio (HR): 0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.30-0. 82] but not OS (HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.48-1.27) compared with adjuvant chemotherapy. In addition, we reconstructed the OS curves of the ADJUVANT and IMPACT studies, and the pooled 3- and 5-year OS rates of stage II-III patients in the TKI group and chemotherapy group were 80% vs. 79% and 66% vs. 64%, respectively. We also reconstructed the DFS curves based on the ADJUVANT, IMPACT, and EVIDENCE studies, and the pooled 1-, 3- and 5-year DFS rates of stage II-III patients in the TKI group and chemotherapy group were 87% vs. 70%, 49% vs. 37% and 28% vs. 29%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with completely resected EGFR-mutant NSCLC, adjuvant first-generation TKIs may delay disease progression but still fail to improve long-term survival compared with conventional chemotherapy.

[Surgery of old people-Thoracic surgery]

Background

The incidence of a large number of diseases relevant to thoracic surgery increases with age; however, old age is still frequently considered a contraindication per se for curative interventions and extensive surgical procedures.

Objective

Overview of the current relevant literature, derivation of recommendations for patient selection as well as preoperative, perioperative and postoperative optimization.

Material and methods

Analysis of the current study situation.

Results

Recent data show that for most thoracic diseases, age alone is not a reason to withhold surgical treatment. Much more important for the selection are comorbidities, frailty, malnutrition and cognitive impairment. A lobectomy or segmentectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in carefully selected octogenarians can provide acceptable to even comparably good short-term and long-term results as in younger patients. Selected > 75-year-old patients with stages II-IIIA NSCLC even benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. With appropriate selection high-risk interventions, such as pneumonectomy in > 70-year-old patients and pulmonary endarterectomy in > 80-year-old patients can be performed without an increase in mortality rates. Even lung transplantation can lead to good long-term results in carefully selected > 70-year-old patients. Minimally invasive surgical techniques and nonintubated anesthesia contribute to risk reduction in marginal patients.

Discussion

In thoracic surgery the biological age rather than the chronological age is decisive. In view of the increasingly older population, further studies are urgently needed to optimize patient selection, type of intervention, preoperative planning and postoperative treatment as well as the quality of life.

[Surgery of old people-Thoracic surgery]

BACKGROUND

The incidence of a large number of diseases relevant to thoracic surgery increases with age; however, old age is still frequently considered a contraindication per se for curative interventions and extensive surgical procedures.

OBJECTIVE

Overview of the current relevant literature, derivation of recommendations for patient selection as well as preoperative, perioperative and postoperative optimization.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Analysis of the current study situation.

RESULTS

Recent data show that for most thoracic diseases, age alone is not a reason to withhold surgical treatment. Much more important for the selection are comorbidities, frailty, malnutrition and cognitive impairment. A lobectomy or segmentectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in carefully selected octogenarians can provide acceptable to even comparably good short-term and long-term results as in younger patients. Selected > 75-year-old patients with stages II-IIIA NSCLC even benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. With appropriate selection high-risk interventions, such as pneumonectomy in > 70-year-old patients and pulmonary endarterectomy in > 80-year-old patients can be performed without an increase in mortality rates. Even lung transplantation can lead to good long-term results in carefully selected > 70-year-old patients. Minimally invasive surgical techniques and nonintubated anesthesia contribute to risk reduction in marginal patients.

DISCUSSION

In thoracic surgery the biological age rather than the chronological age is decisive. In view of the increasingly older population, further studies are urgently needed to optimize patient selection, type of intervention, preoperative planning and postoperative treatment as well as the quality of life.

Older Patients with Lung Cancer: a Summary of Seminal Contributions to Optimal Patient Care

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aspires to summarize the landmark advancements in the management of the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), both historically and contemporarily with special focus in older adults.

RECENT FINDINGS

The past two decades have witnessed remarkable improvements in the diagnosis and management of lung cancer. Screening recommendations now facilitate earlier diagnosis in high-risk individuals, PET/CT scans have improved radiologic accuracy in identifying sites of disease, and surgical management with minimally invasive techniques has rendered surgery safer in those with limited physiologic reserve. Radiation enhancements, especially radiosurgery, have extended the reach and safety of radiation among high-risk populations. Finally, the revolution in precision medicine with identification of numerous actionable mutations, the advent of immunotherapy, and enhanced supportive care have revolutionized the outcomes in patients with advanced lung cancer. Older adults who represent a majority of patients battling lung cancer have not benefitted to the same extent as their younger counterparts. This special population is only expected to grow in coming days. Hence, addressing major gaps in the management of older adults with NSCLC and optimizing the care are much needed.

Adjuvant chemotherapy may improve long-term outcomes in stage IB non-small cell lung cancer patients with previous malignancies: A propensity score-matched analysis

Background

Routine administration of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. To our knowledge, no available studies have assessed the outcomes of chemotherapy in patients with stage IB NSCLC who had prior malignancies.

Methods

Patients with pathological stage IB NSCLC with previous malignancies who underwent surgery between 2004 and 2015 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The patients were categorized into chemotherapy and observation group based on whether they received adjuvant chemotherapy. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce confounding bias, and Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to compare overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) between the two groups. Subgroup analyses of the matched cohorts were then conducted to evaluate the relationship between clinical features and chemotherapy.

Results

A total of 894 eligible patients were identified; 90 (10.1%) patients received postoperative chemotherapy. Patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy obtained obvious OS benefits compared with those who received observation alone (HR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.48–0.97, P = 0.031). In addition, the 5-year OS rate and median OS time in the chemotherapy group were higher and longer, respectively. Although chemotherapy offered no obvious benefits for CSS (HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.57–1.14, P = 0.35), patients who received chemotherapy showed a better 5-year CSS rate. On subgroup analyses, a chemotherapy advantage was observed in advanced age (≥65 years, HR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.38–0.99, P = 0.045). The same chemotherapy advantages were observed in patients diagnosed with higher histological grades (poorly differentiated to undifferentiated) (HR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.33–0.96, P = 0.033) and tumor sizes >3.1–4 cm (HR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.37–0.87, P = 0.010). Interestingly, NSCLC patients with previous malignancies originating from the kidney and bladder (HR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.12–0.99, P = 0.049) showed a chemotherapy advantage. The same chemotherapy advantages were observed in patients diagnosed with NSCLC within 3 to 5 years after prior cancers (HR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.16–0.98, P = 0.044) and with localized SEER stage of prior cancers (HR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.29–0.86, P = 0.012).

Conclusion

These findings indicate that adjuvant chemotherapy may improve long-term outcomes for stage IB NSCLC patients with previous malignancies. It is recommended that physicians consider the clinical features of previous cancers when making adjuvant chemotherapy decisions for these patients.

Major clinical benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer patients aged 75 years or older: a propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Data are currently insufficient to support the use of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) after surgical resection for stage II or III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients aged ≥ 75 years. In this study we evaluated efficacy and safety profile of ACT in this population.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 140 patients ≥ 75 years who underwent curative surgical resection for stage II-III NSCLC from 2010 to 2018 with an indication to ACT according to current guidelines. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to avoid cofounding biases.

RESULTS

Thirty of 140 patients (21%) received ACT. Most patients (n = 24, 80%) received carboplatin in combination with vinorelbine, while 5 patients (17%) received cisplatin plus vinorelbine and one patient (3%) carboplatin plus gemcitabine. The occurrence of adverse events led to treatment discontinuation in 8 (27%) cases, while 19 (63%) patients completed 4 chemotherapy cycles. Common reported adverse events with ACT were anemia (n = 20, 67%), neutropenia (n = 18, 60%), thrombocytopenia (n = 9, 30%), renal impairment (n = 4, 13%) and transaminase elevation (n = 4, 13%). No toxic deaths occurred. The median follow-up was 67 months (IQR: 53-87). ACT was associated with a significant benefit in both relapse-free survival (median 36 vs. 18.5 months, p = 0.049) and overall survival (median not reached [NR] vs. 33.5 months, p = 0.023) in a propensity score-matched analysis which controlled for cofounders.

CONCLUSION

ACT confers a survival benefit after curative resection of stage II-III NSCLC in selected patients aged 75 years or older with a manageable toxicity profile.

Deconstructing ADAURA. It is Not Yet Time to Forgo Platinum-based Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Resected Early Stage (IB-IIIA) EGFR-mutant NSCLC

Recently, the ADAURA study demonstrated statistically significant improved disease-free survival (DFS) with adjuvant osimertinib in patients with resected stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. A consistent improvement in disease-free survival (DFS) was shown, regardless of whether or not patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. Given benefit seen with and without adjuvant chemotherapy, some clinicians may be tempted to forgo chemotherapy and only offer osimertinib post surgical resection. Would this approach be appropriate? Here we carefully dissect data from the ADAURA trial and review how this may fit into the existing evidence on the treatment of early stage NSCLC by discussing five themes, the study design of ADAURA, attempts on adjuvant tyrosine kinase inhibitors, prior studies to support adjuvant chemotherapy, how adjuvant chemotherapy was administered in ADAURA and consideration of toxicities.

Effect of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Survival of Patients With 8th Edition Stage IB Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with 8th edition stage IB (tumor size ≤4 cm) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear.

METHODS

We identified 9757 eligible patients (non-chemotherapy group: n=8303; chemotherapy group: n=1454) between 2004 and 2016 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Log-rank test was used to compare overall survival (OS) between the chemotherapy and non-chemotherapy groups. Cox regression model was applied to investigate the independent prognosis factors of all surgically treated stage IB patients, and then the nomogram was constructed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce the confounding bias, and subgroup analyses of the matched cohort were also performed. Finally, we reviewed 184 patients with stage IB NSCLC from July 2008 to December 2016 in Jinling Hospital as a validation cohort, and compared disease-free survival (DFS) and OS between the two groups.

RESULTS

In the SEER database cohort, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved OS in both unmatched and matched (1417 pairs) cohorts (all P <0.05). The survival benefit (both OS and DFS) was confirmed in the validation cohort (P <0.05). Multivariate analysis showed age, race, sex, marital status, histology, tumor location, tumor size, differentiation, surgical method, lymph nodes (LNs) examined, radiotherapy and chemotherapy were prognostic factors for resected stage IB NSCLC (all P <0.05). The concordance index and calibration curves demonstrated good prediction effect. Subgroup analyses showed patients with the following characteristics benefited from chemotherapy: old age, poor differentiation to undifferentiation, 0-15 LNs examined, visceral pleural invasion (VPI), lobectomy and no radiotherapy (all P <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved survival in 8th edition stage IB NSCLC patients, especially in those with old age, poorly differentiated to undifferentiated tumors, 0-15 LNs examined, VPI, lobotomy and no radiotherapy. Further prospective trials are needed to confirm these conclusions. Besides, the nomogram provides relatively accurate prediction for the prognosis of resected stage IB NSCLC patients.

Elevated Stratifin promotes cisplatin-based chemotherapy failure and poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer

Drug resistance is a key factor in the treatment failure of clinical non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients after adjuvant chemotherapy. Here, our results provide the first evidence that eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2b subunit delta (EIF2B4)-Stratifin (SFN) fusion and increased SFN expression are associated with chemotherapy tolerance and activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase/v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene (PI3K/Akt) signaling pathway in NSCLC patients, suggesting that SFN might have potential prognostic value as a tumor biomarker for the prognosis of patients with NSCLC.

Evolution of systemic therapy for stages I-III non-metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

The treatment goal for patients with early-stage lung cancer is cure. Multidisciplinary discussions of surgical resectability and medical operability determine the modality of definitive local treatment (surgery or radiotherapy) and the associated systemic therapies to further improve the likelihood of cure. Trial evidence supports cisplatin-based adjuvant therapy either after surgical resection or concurrently with radiotherapy. Consensus guidelines support neoadjuvant chemotherapy in lieu of adjuvant chemotherapy and carboplatin-based regimens for patients who are ineligible for cisplatin. The incorporation of newer agents, now standard for patients with stage IV lung cancer, into the curative therapy paradigm has lagged owing to inefficient trial designs, the lengthy follow-up needed to assess survival end points and a developmental focus on the advanced-stage disease setting. Surrogate end points, such as pathological response, are being studied and might shorten trial durations. In 2018, the anti-PD-L1 antibody durvalumab was approved for patients with stage III lung cancer after concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Since then, the study of targeted therapies and immunotherapies in patients with early-stage lung cancer has rapidly expanded. In this Review, we present the current considerations in the treatment of patients with early-stage lung cancer and explore the current and future state of clinical research to develop systemic therapies for non-metastatic lung cancer.

Evolution of systemic therapy for stages I-III non-metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

The treatment goal for patients with early-stage lung cancer is cure. Multidisciplinary discussions of surgical resectability and medical operability determine the modality of definitive local treatment (surgery or radiotherapy) and the associated systemic therapies to further improve the likelihood of cure. Trial evidence supports cisplatin-based adjuvant therapy either after surgical resection or concurrently with radiotherapy. Consensus guidelines support neoadjuvant chemotherapy in lieu of adjuvant chemotherapy and carboplatin-based regimens for patients who are ineligible for cisplatin. The incorporation of newer agents, now standard for patients with stage IV lung cancer, into the curative therapy paradigm has lagged owing to inefficient trial designs, the lengthy follow-up needed to assess survival end points and a developmental focus on the advanced-stage disease setting. Surrogate end points, such as pathological response, are being studied and might shorten trial durations. In 2018, the anti-PD-L1 antibody durvalumab was approved for patients with stage III lung cancer after concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Since then, the study of targeted therapies and immunotherapies in patients with early-stage lung cancer has rapidly expanded. In this Review, we present the current considerations in the treatment of patients with early-stage lung cancer and explore the current and future state of clinical research to develop systemic therapies for non-metastatic lung cancer.

TRAP1 is a predictive biomarker of platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy benefits in patients with resected lung adenocarcinoma

Platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy after complete resection has become a standard treatment for patients with stage II to IIIA non-small cell lung cancer; however, not all patients exhibit survival benefits. Therefore, the development of predictive biomarkers for selecting a subgroup of patients who may show improved survival after these treatments is important. Among the 42 proteins identified here using a proteomics analysis that were recognized by autoantibodies in pretreated sera from patients with lung adenocarcinoma who received platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy, the tumor necrosis factor-receptor-associated protein 1 (TRAP1) was detected in patients with a short disease-free survival. TRAP1 expression was immunohistochemically analyzed in 64 patients with completely resected stage II and IIIA lung adenocarcinoma treated with platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy. TRAP1 expression was significantly associated with higher p-TNM stage (P = 0.005) and lymph node metastasis (P = 0.017). Moreover, TRAP1 expression was significantly correlated with a shorter disease-free survival (P = 0.028). Furthermore, TRAP1-siRNA-treated LC-2/ad cells derived from lung adenocarcinoma exhibited significantly reduced proliferation and increased sensitivity to cisplatin. These results suggest that TRAP1 expression is a valuable biomarker for predicting the poor survival of platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resected lung adenocarcinoma.

Multi-disciplinary approach for the management of non-metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in the Middle East and Africa: Expert panel recommendations

The Middle East and Africa (MEA) region, a large geographical area, lies at the confluence of Asian, Caucasian and African races and comprises of a population with several distinct ethnicities. The course of management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) differs as per patients' performance status as well as stage of disease, requiring personalized therapy decisions. Although management of NSCLC has received a significant impetus in the form of molecularly targeted therapies and immune therapies in last few years, surgery remains gold standard for patients with early-stage disease. In case of unresectable disease, radiotherapy and chemotherapy are the primary management modalities. With newer therapies being approved for treatment of early stage disease, use of multi-disciplinary team (MDT) for comprehensive management of NSCLC is of prime importance. A group of experts with interest in thoracic oncology, deliberated and arrived at a consensus statement for the community oncologists treating patients with NSCLC in the MEA region. The deliberation was based on the review of the published evidence including literature and global and local guidelines, subject expertise of the participating panellists and experience in real-life management of patients with NSCLC. We present the proposed regional adaptations of international guidelines and recommends the MDT approach for management of NSCLC in MEA.

Icotinib versus Cisplatin Plus Docetaxel as Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Stage II (N1+) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring Positive EGFR Mutations: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Purpose

The superior efficacy of first-line treatment with icotinib over that of standard chemotherapy has been well demonstrated in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. However, whether icotinib is superior to cisplatin plus docetaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II (N1+) NSCLC selected by EGFR mutation is controversial.

Methods

A total of 43 patients with completely resected stage II (T1-2N1M0) NSCLC and proven sensitive EGFR mutation (19Del or L858R) between January 2010 and December 2019 were included in our study. The disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed in 22 patients treated with icotinib and 21 patients treated with cisplatin plus docetaxel. Factors affecting DFS and OS were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimator and univariate Cox regression analysis.

Results

Our cohort included 22 icotinib patients and 21 cisplatin plus docetaxel patients with a median follow-up of 35.5 months and 38 months, respectively. Survival time was significantly longer in the icotinib group than in the chemotherapy group, with a median DFS of 47 months (95% CI, not reached) versus 18 months (95% CI, 12.4-23.6; HR 0.16; 95% CI, 0.07-0.35; log-rank p<0.0001). In the icotinib group, the most common adverse effects (AEs) were skin rash (40.9%) and elevated alanine aminotransferase (22.7%), whereas in the cisplatin plus docetaxel group, the most common AEs were nausea or vomiting (90.5%), anorexia (71.4%), and fatigue (71.4%). No deaths were treatment-related.

Conclusion

In this study, we demonstrated that in EGFR mutation-positive patients with completely resected stage II (T1-2N1M0) NSCLC, icotinib might provide DFS benefits, and reduced drug toxicity compared to cisplatin plus docetaxel. Thus, icotinib may be a reasonable option for adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with pathological stage II (N1+) NSCLC with EGFR mutation.

Immunotherapy in older patients with non-small cell lung cancer: Young International Society of Geriatric Oncology position paper

Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors against programmed cell death receptor (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand (PD-L1) has been implemented in the treatment pathway of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from locally advanced disease to the metastatic setting. This approach has resulted in improved survival and a more favourable toxicity profile when compared with chemotherapy. Following the successful introduction of single-agent immunotherapy, current clinical trials are focusing on combination treatments with chemotherapy or radiotherapy or even other immunotherapeutic agents. However, most of the data available from these trials are derived from, and therefore might be more applicable to younger and fitter patients rather than older and often frail lung cancer real-world patients. This article provides a detailed review of these immunotherapy agents with a focus on the data available regarding older NSCLC patients and makes recommendations to fill evidence gaps in this patient population.

Systemic Therapy of Common Tumours in Older Patients: Challenges and Opportunities. A Young International Society of Geriatric Oncology Review Paper

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Decision-making for systemic treatments in older patients with cancer is difficult because of concerns for decreased organ function, risk of toxicity, limited life expectancy due to comorbidities and the lack of evidence available to guide its management in this population. Here, we review the data on the role of systemic agents for the treatment of common malignancies in this age group.

RECENT FINDINGS

Evidence on the use of systemic treatments for older patients with cancer is increasing, especially for newer options including immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted agents that provide comparable benefit in older and younger patients. Nonetheless, the risks for short- and long-term toxicities need to be considered. More research is warranted and represents a unique opportunity to increase the knowledge on cancer treatment for older adults. Healthy, older individuals should be considered for standard systemic treatment options, whereas those at risk based on geriatric assessments require adjusted plans. Geriatric assessments are key for decision-making.

Pulmonary Sarcomatoid Carcinoma: Experience From SEER Database and Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is a rare type of lung cancer. This study aimed to explore the appropriate treatment for PSC.

METHODS

Two cohorts were used: patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (1988 to 2014) and Shanghai resident patients at Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital (2009 to 2019) in China. Cox regression analysis was applied to identify prognostic factors for progression-free survival and overall survival (OS). Interaction assessments were performed using likelihood ratio tests to examine relationships between adjuvant chemotherapy and other baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

In the SEER cohort, 1640 patients with PSC were identified, with a median survival and a 5-year OS rate of 7 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 6 to 8 months) and 19.5%, respectively. Multivariable Cox analysis of surgically treated patients revealed that adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly associated with better survival (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.98), and the benefit was more pronounced in T3 to T4 stage (P = .04) and N-positive patients (P < .01). In the Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital cohort (n = 175), the median progression-free survival and OS were 8 months (95% CI, 7 to 12 months) and 12 months (95% CI, 10 to 18 months), respectively, with a 5-year OS rate of 25.1%. Similarly, the survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy was confirmed in patients with surgical resection (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.81), but this benefit was restricted to patients who were younger (age <63 years; P = .02) and had a higher body mass index (>25 kg/m²; P < .01) by interaction assessments. The disease control rate after chemotherapy was 58.62%, and the disease control rate after targeted therapy was 57.14%.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant chemotherapy should be recommended for patients with surgically treated PSC, especially for patients with advanced-stage cancer, younger age, or higher body mass index.

Feasibility Study of Adjuvant Chemotherapy with Carboplatin and Nab-Paclitaxel for Completely Resected NSCLC

Purpose

Adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin (CDDP) plus vinorelbine is the standard regimen for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, CDDP elicits severe toxic effects, including emesis, neurotoxicity, and renal damage; carboplatin (CBDCA) may be a feasible alternative for CDDP-unfit patients. CBDCA plus paclitaxel (PTX) adjuvant chemotherapy showed a survival benefit for patients with stage IB tumors >4 cm in size, while CBDCA plus nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-PTX showed greater efficacy and lower neurotoxicity than CBDCA plus PTX in advanced NSCLC. Here, we investigated the feasibility of using CBDCA plus nab-PTX as adjuvant chemotherapy for NSCLC.

Patients and Methods

Patients with completely resected stage II or III NSCLC, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1 and adequate kidney function, received four cycles of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with CBDCA (AUC=5 mg/mL/min, on day 1) and nab-PTX (100 mg/m², on days 1, 8, and 15) administered every 4 weeks within 8 weeks after surgery. The study was designed as a prospective, single-center, Phase II study. The primary endpoint was the completion rate of chemotherapy; secondary endpoints were two-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and safety. The expected completion rate was 80%, with a 50% lower limit.

Results

Of 21 enrolled patients, 18 (85.7%) were CDDP-unfit owing to age (≥75 years old [n=11, 52.4%]) or mild renal impairment (n=7, 33.3%). Nineteen of the 21 enrolled patients were assigned to the intervention. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (n=15, 78.9%) and anemia (n=3, 15.8%). The completion rate for the four cycles was 63.2% (95% CI, 38.4–83.7). Two-year RFS was 56.8% (95% CI, 29.7–76.9).

Conclusion

The completion rate for CBDCA plus nab-PTX as adjuvant chemotherapy for CDDP-unfit NSCLC patients did not reach treatment feasibility. Further dose modifications may be required in future studies.

Use of adjuvant chemotherapy for nonsmall cell lung cancer: Is advanced age a prognostic factor?

PURPOSE

In patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the effect of age on adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) after primary surgical treatment is controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of age and other clinical variables on survival in NSCLC patients who received adjuvant CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

NSCLC patients who underwent primary resection and received adjuvant CT between January 2012 and January 2016 were included in the study. The patients were divided into two age groups: (1) patients >65 years old (older patient group) and (2) patients ≤ 65 years old (young patient group). The effects of clinical variables such as age, histology, pT stage, pN stage, pTNM stage, adjuvant thoracic radiotherapy, and recurrence status on survival were assessed using the log-rank test and multivariable Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 91 NSCLC patients who received adjuvant CT after complete resection were included in the study. The median age of the patients was 60 (36-73) years. Eighty-six percent of the patients were male. 49.4% had squamous NSCLC and 50.6% had nonsquamous NSCLC. 59% had stage I and II disease and 41% had stage III disease. The mean overall survival was 61.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 51.28-72.69] in the young patient group and 73.1 months (95% CI 60.24-85.94) in the older patient group . The mean disease-free survival was 47.0 months (95% CI 37.81-56.23) in the young patient group and 51.1 months (95% CI 40.68-57.17) in the older patient group (P = 0.119 and P = 0.407, respectively). Pathological stage III [heart rate (HR): 2.615, P = 0.014] and presence of recurrence (HR: 2.496, P = 0.019) were found to be independent risk factors. However, age did not show statistical significance (HR: 0.428, 95% CI 0.128-1.427, P = 0.167).

CONCLUSION

In NSCLC patients who underwent complete resection and received adjuvant CT, advanced age had no prognostic effect on survival.

Prognostic value of adjuvant therapy in T4 non-small cell lung cancer: An inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis

Background

According to the current clinical guidelines, chemoradiotherapy is considered the standard treatment for locally advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We analyzed the prognostic effect of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in resected patients using the new eighth tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging systems based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database.

Methods

We identified 3008 patients with stage IIIA NSCLC (T4N0M0) who underwent sublobar resection, lobectomy, or pneumonectomy. Covariates affecting treatment selection or survival were included as part of propensity score models for matching and weighting. The effect of ACT on survival was assessed, stratified by postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) use, tumor size, and age.

Results

Analyses of 2016 patients were conducted with standardized differences in covariates < 10% after matching. ACT was associated with significantly improved five‐year overall survival (51.1% vs. 39.7%; P = 0.0260) in patients aged 21–65 with > 7 cm tumors, even after adjusting for the presence or absence of the superior sulcus (P = 0.0003). No significant outcomes were observed using other stratifications in the matched analysis. Moreover, ACT with PORT conferred a potential survival benefit in 21–65‐year‐old patients with 0–7 cm tumors (for all causes of death: hazard ratio 0.414, 95% confidence interval 0.251–0.684).

Conclusion

In this population‐based cohort, ACT prolonged the survival of patients aged 21–65 with a tumor > 7 cm, with or without PORT. Inverse probability of treatment weighting can estimate the treatment effect and is suitable for use with survival data.

Anticancer Activity of Natural Compounds from Plant and Marine Environment

This paper describes the substances of plant and marine origin that have anticancer properties. The chemical structure of the molecules of these substances, their properties, mechanisms of action, their structure⁻activity relationships, along with their anticancer properties and their potential as chemotherapeutic drugs are discussed in this paper. This paper presents natural substances from plants, animals, and their aquatic environments. These substances include the vinca alkaloids, mistletoe plant extracts, podophyllotoxin derivatives, taxanes, camptothecin, combretastatin, and others including geniposide, colchicine, artesunate, homoharringtonine, salvicine, ellipticine, roscovitine, maytanasin, tapsigargin, and bruceantin. Compounds (psammaplin, didemnin, dolastin, ecteinascidin, and halichondrin) isolated from the marine plants and animals such as microalgae, cyanobacteria, heterotrophic bacteria, invertebrates (e.g., sponges, tunicates, and soft corals) as well as certain other substances that have been tested on cells and experimental animals and used in human chemotherapy.

Multidisciplinary treatment of lung cancer in older patients: A review

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Older patients represent approximately half of the patient population and optimal management of these patients is challenging. In early-stagenon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), lobectomy should be considered in fit older patients. For unfit patients, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) represents a good alternative. While data on the benefit and risk of concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (cCRT) in older patients with locally advanced NSCLC is conflicting, age alone should not preclude cCRT. Multidisciplinary collaboration is essential for appropriate patient selection. In limited disease small cell lung cancer (SCLC), older patients appear to benefit similarly from standard treatment compared to their younger counterparts, however, with a higher risk of toxicity. Appropriately selected older patients with lung cancer seem to derive as much benefit from active oncological treatment as their younger counterparts. Geriatric screening tests and comprehensive geriatric assessments (CGA) can be helpful when choosing between treatment strategies. Older patients are at risk for under-treatment; this should be avoided by proper selection and multidisciplinary management. This review outlines the management of lung cancer in older patients.

[Role of Pharmacists in Completion of Adjuvant Cisplatin-Vinorelbine Chemotherapy in Japanese Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

　Adjuvant cisplatin-vinorelbine chemotherapy has been shown to be effective in patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in several Phase III trials, but not yet in the Japanese population. Pharmacists are expected to assist patients with completion of adjuvant chemotherapy. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the compliance with and safety of adjuvant cisplatin-vinorelbine chemotherapy in Japanese patients and to evaluate the contribution of pharmacists to completion of treatment. Thirty-four patients with NSCLC who received adjuvant cisplatin-vinorelbine chemotherapy at Kyorin University Hospital between January 2006 and June 2015 were reviewed. The treatment schedule comprised cisplatin 80 mg/m² on day 1 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Four 3-week cycles were planned. A pharmacist provided guidance to all patients and monitored them for adverse effects thereafter. The pharmacist intervened with advice to doctors as necessary. The 4 cycles were administered in 67.6% of cases. There were no treatment-related deaths. The main grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia (76.5%) and anorexia (38.2%). The most common reason for discontinuation and dose reduction was anorexia. There were 56 instances of pharmacist intervention. In total, 96.4% of the pharmacist interventions were implemented by doctors, which included administration of an antiemetic on 15 occasions and hot fomentation for prevention of vasculitis on 7 occasions. Adjuvant cisplatin-vinorelbine chemotherapy was tolerated by most patients but was discontinued because of adverse events in some. Pharmacist intervention aids completion of planned chemotherapy and management of treatment-related adverse events.

Early Mortality in Patients Undergoing Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Although adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in patients with completely resected NSCLC, it is also associated with potentially disabling or lethal adverse events. Because there is limited information on the early mortality among patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy, we used the National Cancer Database to calculate the percentage of deaths within the first 6 months of starting chemotherapy.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for patients age 18 or older in whom stage IB to IIIA NSCLC had been diagnosed between 2004 and 2012 and who had received multiagent adjuvant chemotherapy starting within 120 days from the surgical resection with negative surgical margins. Age groups were divided as follows: younger than 50, 51 to 60, 61 to 70, 71 to 80, and older than 80 years.

RESULTS

A total of 19,691 patients met the eligibility criteria, 19,398 of whom had a known 6-month mortality status. The median age was 65 years (range 19-89). The 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-month cumulative mortality rates from initiation of chemotherapy were 0.7%, 1.3%, 1.9%, 2.6%, 3.2%, and 4.1% respectively. The 6-month mortality rates for each age group (≤ 50 years, 51-60, 61-70, 71-80, and >80) were 2.6%, 3.1%, 4.1%, 5.3%, and 7.6%, respectively (p < 0.001). Independent factors associated with increased 6-month mortality included age 71 to 80 versus younger than 50 (OR = 1.72, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16-2.55, p = 0.007), age older than 80 versus younger than 50 (OR = 2.43, 95% CI: 1.40-4.20, p = 0.002), male sex (OR = 1.42; 95% CI: 1.21-1.67, p < 0.001), Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score of 2 versus 0 (OR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.22-1.89, p < 0.001), pneumonectomy (OR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.11-1.73, p = 0.004), length of postopertive stay longer than 6 days after surgery (OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.03-1.41, p = 0.02), and readmission within 30 days from surgery (OR = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.15-1.90, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Early mortality with the use of adjuvant chemotherapy after complete resection of NSCLC is a clinical concern. The risk is higher in patients older than 70 years, with higher comorbidity scores and a prolonged length of stay postoperatively.

Chemotherapy in elderly patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Using chemotherapy in elderly nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is often challenging given concerns of treatment-related toxicity. However, data have demonstrated that chemotherapy can lead to improved survival in this age group. In this review, we summarize existing data and discuss the role of chemotherapy in elderly patients with localized, locally advanced, and metastatic NSCLC.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clear evidence-based guidelines for chemotherapy management in elderly patients is lacking given the limited prospective data available. However, there are more clinical trials investigating optimal chemotherapy agents and dosing schedules specific to the elderly. Comprehensive geriatric assessment-directed interventions are also being prospectively investigated to improve treatment selection for elderly patients.

SUMMARY

Chronological age should not be a limiting factor for chemotherapy use in elderly NSCLC patients. Several studies have demonstrated similar survival benefits than in younger patients when chemotherapy is given as adjuvant treatment for localized disease; part of definitive treatment with radiation in locally advanced disease; and palliative treatment for advanced NSCLC, however, at the cost of greater toxicity. Tolerability of chemotherapy in this heterogeneous group can be difficult to predict. Therefore, therapeutic decisions should be individualized based on performance status. Comprehensive geriatric assessment should be used to supplement performance status measures to minimize both under and overtreatment.

[Current knowledge on perioperative treatments of non-small cell lung carcinomas]

Surgery is still the main treatment in early-stage of non-small cell lung cancer with 5-year survival of stage IA patients exceeding 80%, but 5-year survival of stage II patients rapidly decreasing with tumor size, N status, and visceral pleura invasion. The major metastatic risk in such patients has supported clinical research assessing systemic or loco-regional perioperative treatments. Modern phase 3 trials clearly validated adjuvant or neo-adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy in resected stage I-III patients as a standard treatment of which value has been reassessed several independent meta-analyses, showing a 5% benefit in 5y-survival, and a decrease of the relative risk for death around from 12 to 25%. Conversely perioperative treatments were not validated for stage IA and IB patients. In more advanced stage patients, neo-adjuvant radio-chemotherapy has not been validated either. Adjuvant radiotherapy for N2 patients is currently tested in the large international phase 3 trial Lung-ART/IFCT-0503. The development of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has helped adjuvant chemotherapies for elderly patients. Perioperative targeted treatments in NSCLC with EGFR or ALK molecular alterations is currently assessed in the U.S. ALCHEMIST prospective trial. Finally, the role of immune check-points inhibitors is currently evaluated in a large international phase 3 trial testing adjuvant anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody, the BR31/IFCT-1401 trial, while a proof-of principle neo-adjuvant trial IONESCO/IFCT-1601, has just begun by the end of the 2016 year, with survival results of both trials expected in 5 to 7 years.

Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The use of 4 cycles of cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy is now the standard of care for patients with resected stage II and IIIA non-small cell lung cancer. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy lacks the same level of data as adjuvant treatment, but meta-analyses of this approach support its use. Selection of patients who are most likely to benefit from chemotherapy remain elusive. Ongoing adjuvant trials are exploring biomarkers, molecularly targeted agents, postoperative radiation therapy, and immunotherapy.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

Background

Adjuvant chemotherapy after complete surgical resection is currently the standard of care for patients with stage IB, II, or IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer. However, the generalizability of this treatment to elderly patients is controversial. We investigated the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients aged over 75 years with stage IB-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 246 consecutive patients aged over 75 years with stage IB-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer who underwent standard lung cancer surgery between January 2001 and December 2015. They were divided into 102 who had adjuvant chemotherapy and 144 who had none (control group). The outcomes were compared between the two groups, and prognostic factors were evaluated.

Results

Relapse-free survival and overall survival were significantly shorter in the control group than the chemotherapy group ( p = 0.006 and p = 0.008, respectively). In multivariable analyses, adjuvant chemotherapy was found to be an independent prognostic factor for relapse-free survival and overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.594, 95% confidence interval: 0.396–0.893, p = 0.012; and hazard ratio = 0.616, 95% confidence interval: 0.397–0.957, p = 0.031, respectively). After inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting adjustment using the propensity score for baseline characteristics, chemotherapy almost improved relapse-free survival and overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.652, 95% confidence interval: 0.433–0.981, p = 0.040; and hazard ratio = 0.657, 95% confidence interval: 0.429–1.004, p = 0.052, respectively).

Conclusions

Adjuvant chemotherapy improved the prognosis after standard lung cancer surgery in patients aged over 75 years with stage IB-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer.

Impact of platinum/pemetrexed combination versus other platinum-based regimens on adjuvant chemotherapy in resected lung adenocarcinoma

For advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), although platinum/pemetrexed is known to result in a longer survival compared with other regimens, the outcome in the adjuvant setting is still unknown. In this study, the difference of the disease-free survival (DFS) between lung adenocarcinoma patients treated with platinum/pemetrexed and with other platinum-based doublets was concerned. A total of 389 radically resected lung adenocarcinoma patients received adjuvant chemotherapy with platinum/pemetrexed chemotherapy (Group A, n = 143) or other third generation platinum-based regimens (Group B, n = 246) were analyzed in terms of DFS. Propensity score matching (PSM) allowed generation of best matched pairs for the two categories. DFS was proved to be considerably better in pemetrexed doublets group (P = 0.0079); and platinum/pemetrexed was found to be associated with lower rates of several hematological and non-hematological adverse events (AEs), when compared with gemcitabine containing chemotherapy (leukopenia: RR 0.514, p = 0.001; neutropenia: RR 0.688, p = 0.002), or taxanes-doublets treatment (leukopenia: RR 0.685, p = 0.019; neutropenia: RR 0.805, p = 0.032). For patients with radically resected pulmonary adenocarcinoma, adjuvant chemotherapy with platinum/pemetrexed results in a better DFS and a less clinical toxicity in comparison with non-pemetrexed based doublets.

Is there an optimal time to initiate adjuvant chemotherapy to predict benefit of survival in non-small cell lung cancer?

Objective

Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) after curative resection is known to improve the survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, few studies have reported the correlation between the time to initiation of AC (TTAC) and survival in NSCLC patients.

Methods

The clinical data of 925 NSCLC patients who received curative resection and post-operative AC at the Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences between 2003 and 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. TTAC was measured from the date of surgery to the initiation of AC. Disease-free survival (DFS) was defined as the duration from surgery to the time of tumor recurrence or last follow-up evaluation. The optimal cut-off value of TTAC was determined by maximally selected log-rank statistics. The DFS curve was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to identify risk factors independently associated with DFS. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed for survival analysis using the match data.

Results

The optimal discriminating cut-off value of TTAC was set at d 35 after curative resection based on which the patients were assigned into two groups: group A (≤35 d) and group B (>35 d). There was no significant difference in the DFS between the two groups (P=0.246), indicating that the TTAC is not an independent prognostic factor for DFS. A further comparison continued to show no significant difference in the DFS among 258 PSM pairs (P=0.283).

Conclusions

There was no significant correlation between the TTAC and DFS in NSCLC patients. Studies with larger samples are needed to further verify this conclusion.

Management of stage I and II nonsmall cell lung cancer

The incidence of stage I and II nonsmall cell lung cancer is likely to increase with the ageing population and introduction of screening for high-risk individuals. Optimal management requires multidisciplinary collaboration. Local treatments include surgery and radiotherapy and these are currently combined with (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy in specific cases to improve long-term outcome. Targeted therapies and immunotherapy may also become important therapeutic modalities in this patient group. For resectable disease in patients with low cardiopulmonary risk, complete surgical resection with lobectomy remains the gold standard. Minimally invasive techniques, conservative and sublobar resections are suitable for a subset of patients. Data are emerging that radiotherapy, especially stereotactic body radiation therapy, is a valid alternative in compromised patients who are high-risk candidates for surgery. Whether this is also true for good surgical candidates remains to be evaluated in randomised trials. In specific subgroups adjuvant chemotherapy has been shown to prolong survival; however, patient selection remains important. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may yield similar results as adjuvant chemotherapy. The role of targeted therapies and immunotherapy in early stage nonsmall cell lung cancer has not yet been determined and results of randomised trials are awaited.

Medical Treatment in Elderly Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. In the USA, ≈60 % of lung cancer cases are diagnosed in elderly patients (≥65 years of age). However, elderly patients are underrepresented in clinical studies, leading to a paucity of evidence to guide treatment decisions. Several treatment barriers exist in elderly patients, including comorbidities and poor performance status. In addition, lack of reliable geriatric assessment tools and physician reluctance to treat may contribute to undertreatment in this population. For decades, systemic chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was either omitted or given as monotherapy, frequently with significant dose reductions, potentially compromising the efficacy of these therapies. Recent analyses of elderly subgroups from multiple clinical trials provide evidence for improved outcomes associated with platinum-based doublet chemotherapies vs monotherapy. Moreover, in the new era of precision medicine, molecularly targeted therapies and more recently immune-targeting therapies (anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 agents) exhibit relatively milder toxicities but superior clinical outcomes in subgroups of patients compared with conventional cytotoxic chemotherapies. Further clinical trials will be needed to confirm similar safety and efficacy profiles of these therapeutic approaches in the elderly compared with their younger counterparts. In this article, we review available evidence from clinical studies and also present expert consensus on the management of NSCLC in the elderly, including treatment in the adjuvant setting and treatment of advanced disease. Screening tools, such as the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, that help to identify the right population of elderly patients suitable for systemic treatment are also discussed.

[Perioperative therapies in surgical non N2 non-small cell lung cancer]

Platinum-based perioperative chemotherapy is actually the standard of care in stage II-IIIa non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A benefit may also be seen in stage IB NSCLC with tumors of more than 4cm of diameter. Perioperative chemotherapy improves 5-year survival of 4 to 15%. This benefit is mainly proved by postoperative chemotherapy trials. Nevertheless, preoperative chemotherapy has advantages: a better tolerance, an estimation of tumor chemosensibility, without an increased postoperative morbimortality. However, pTNM and pathological tumor analyses are modified. Indications of postoperative radiotherapy are limited. In early stage NSCLC (stage I-II), radiotherapy worsens survival. Radiotherapy is routinely achieved in NSCLC with parietal tumor invasion and incomplete tumor resection. Indications of immunotherapy and targeted therapies in case of oncogenic addiction remain to be established in resected NSCLC. Several biomarkers are studied to better describe the indications of perioperative chemotherapy: recognize groups of patients with a worse prognosis and distinguish chemosensibility of the tumor.

Factors Associated With the Use of Radiation Therapy in Patients With Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Alberta, Canada: A Population-based Study

Background

Cancer care in Alberta, Canada is publicly funded and provides patients with access to health care facilities and providers. The distribution of patients and health services across Alberta presents challenges to the delivery of cancer care, especially radiation therapy. In this study, we examined the association between patient and health system factors, the use of radiation therapy and survival outcomes in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Patients and methods

The provincial cancer registry was used to identify all patients who presented with clinical stage III NSCLC, diagnosed from 2005 to 2007, in Alberta. Patient characteristics, diagnostic method, treatment modality and treatment outcomes were collected from provincial health information systems for analyses. Factors influencing overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

Nine hundred twenty-nine patients were identified. Sixty-two percent of patients received radiation therapy (RT) as part of their initial cancer treatment and had a median OS of 1.04 vs. 0.34 years with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.54. On multivariable analysis, patients who were less likely to receive any therapy were older, had higher comorbidity scores and were registered in community cancer centers without radiation therapy infrastructure. Patients registered in tertiary cancer centers had a higher likelihood of accessing multimodality treatment than patients in community centers, with a statistical significance of P<0.001 after correcting for age, gender, histology, substage, and comorbidity.

Interpretation

Improving access to radiotherapy treatment for patients presenting to non-radiation therapy centers at diagnosis has the potential to decrease variations in cancer care and improve cancer control outcomes in clinical stage III NSCLC.

Age Affects the Mitigating Efficacy of Riboflavin Against Cisplatin-Induced Toxicity In Vivo

Cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (CP), a prominent anticancer drug, exerts toxic insults that are functional to various factors that compromise its antineoplastic activity. Riboflavin (RF) is an essential vitamin and photosensitizer that ameliorates CP-induced toxic insults in vivo in a dose-dependent manner. The aim of the present study is to investigate how age can influence the ameliorative effect of RF against CP-induced toxicity. Ninety male mice were divided into three age groups: young, adult, and old for the present investigation under an established treatment strategy with CP, RF, and their combinations under photoillumination for 1 mo. Their kidneys and serum samples were assessed for redox status [superoxide dismutase, catalase, reduced glutathione, malondialdehyde (MDA), carbonyl contents, and glutathione-S-transferase], biochemical analysis (renal function markers-nitric oxide), comet assay, and histopathology. The adult group showed not only the strongest resistance against the CP-induced toxicity but also the better ameliorative effect of RF followed by the young and old groups, respectively, with well-maintained redox status concomitant with the level of renal function markers, MDA, and carbonyl contents near the control values. Furthermore, comet assay and histopathological evaluation confirmed the results in a dose-dependent manner. Hence, age is an important patient-related factor that can influence the final clinical outcome under personalized chemoradiotherapy.

Serum Anti-Gal-3 Autoantibody is a Predictive Marker of the Efficacy of Platinum-Based Chemotherapy against Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Identification of predictive markers for the efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy is necessary to improve the quality of the life of cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We detected proteins recognized by autoantibodies in pretreated sera from patients with lung adenocarcinoma (AC) evaluated as showing progressive disease (PD) or a partial response (PR) after cisplatin-based chemotherapy by proteomic analysis. Then, the levels of the candidate autoantibodies in the pretreated serum were validated by dot-blot analysis for 22 AC patients who received platinum-based chemotherapy, and the expression of identified proteins was immunohistochemically analyzed in 40 AC biopsy specimens.

RESULTS

An autoantibody against galectin-3 (Gal-3) was detected in pretreated sera from an AC patient with PD. Serum IgG levels of anti-Gal-3 autoantibody were significantly higher in patients evaluated with PD than in those with PR and stable disease (SD) (p = 0.0084). Furthermore, pretreated biopsy specimens taken from patients evaluated as showing PD following platinum- based chemotherapy showed a tendency to have a higher positive rate of Gal-3 than those with PR and SD (p = 0.0601).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that serum IgG levels of anti-Gal-3 autoantibody may be useful to predict the efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy for patients with lung AC.

Antrodia cinnamomea alleviates cisplatin-induced hepatotoxicity and enhances chemo-sensitivity of line-1 lung carcinoma xenografted in BALB/cByJ mice

Whereas cisplatin (cis-diamminedichloroplatinum II) is a first-line medicine to treat solid cancerous tumors, it often causes serious side effects. New medicines that have an equivalent or even better therapeutic effect but with free or less side effects than cisplatin are highly anticipated in cancer therapy. Recent reports revealed that Antrodia cinnamomea (AC) possesses hepatoprotective activity in addition to anticancer. In this study, we wanted to know whether AC enhances chemo-sensitivity of cisplatin and/or alleviates cisplatin-induced hepatotoxicity, as well as the underlying mechanisms thereof. Our results indicated that AC inhibited proliferation of line-1 lung carcinoma cells and rescued hepatic HepG2 cells from cisplatin-induced cell death in vitro. The fact is that AC and cisplatin synergized to constrain growth of line-1 lung carcinoma cells in BALB/cByJ mice. Quantitative real-time PCR further revealed that AC promoted expression of apoptosis-related genes, while it decreased expression of NF-κB and VEGF in tumor tissues. In liver, AC reduced cisplatin-induced liver dysfunctions, liver inflammation and hepatic apoptosis in addition to body weight restoration. In summary, AC is able to increase cisplatin efficacy by triggering expression of apoptosis-related genes in line-1 lung cancer cells as well as to protect liver from tissue damage by avoiding cisplatin-induced hepatic inflammation and cell death.

Impact of age on adjuvant chemotherapy after radical resection in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) after radical surgery is known to improve the survival of patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there are few studies reporting the impact of age on the efficacy of ACT in NSCLC patients. All patients who received postoperative ACT in the Cancer Hospital, the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, between 2001 and 2013 with complete records in the database of the hospital and met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in this study for analysis. The primary end point was disease‐free survival (DFS) in terms of age. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier estimates, log‐rank tests, and Cox's proportional hazards regression analysis. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used, survival analysis and subgroup analysis of the match data were carried out. Of 1095 patients with stage IB to stage IIIA NSCLC who underwent radical resection, 865 cases who met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. Of them, 156 (18.0%) patients were 65 years old or older, and the remaining 709 (82.0%) patients were younger than 65. The DFS between the younger group and the elderly group was not significantly different neither before PSM (100.714 weeks [95% CI: 84.421, 117.007] vs. 99.571 weeks [95% CI: 82.621, 116.522]; P = 0.555) nor after PSM (104.857 weeks [95% CI: 81.495, 128.220] vs. 97.429 weeks [95% CI: 81.743, 113.114]; P = 0.328) using the Kaplan–Meier method.The results suggest that the benefit on DFS was similar regardless of age of NSCLC patients. ACT should not be withheld from elderly patients. However, these conclusions are limited by the nature of this retrospective study, and therefore prospective trials are required for further verification.

Assessment of Referral and Chemotherapy Treatment Patterns for Elderly Patients With Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Physiologic changes of aging in combination with greater comorbidity could lead to treatment nihilism for elderly patients (≥ 70 years old) with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Randomized trials have shown improved survival with chemotherapy since 1999, but it remains unclear whether these data have translated into practice.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, population-based cohort study of NSCLC cases diagnosed in Ontario, Canada from 2000 to 2010. We compared referral and treatment patterns among patients aged < 70 versus ≥ 70 years. Multivariable analyses evaluated predictors of referral to medical oncology or treatment with chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Of 61,646 patients with NSCLC, 32,131 (52.1%) were ≥ 70 years. Fewer adenocarcinomas were diagnosed in the elderly (29.8% vs. 44%), and more elderly patients lacked microscopic confirmation of malignancy (20.1% vs. 6.2%). Charlson co-morbidity scores ≥ 2 (14.0% vs. 7.4%) were higher in the elderly. Only 59.5% of elderly patients with NSCLC were referred to a medical oncologist, versus 78.5% of younger patients. Elderly patients were less likely to receive chemotherapy (18.3% vs. 46.7%), even among those referred to a medical oncologist (30.1% vs. 58.6%). Neither referral nor treatment changed substantially over time. The elderly also had a shorter median survival (5.8 vs. 9.6 months); however, there was less difference in median survival (13.6 vs. 14.9 months) among patients receiving chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients are less likely to be considered for systemic therapy for NSCLC, and evidence of benefit has had minimal impact on practice. We believe this disparity could be improved through systematically using tools to comprehensively assess elderly patients.

Practice pearls in the management of lung cancer in the elderly

Lung cancer is a disease that afflicts the elderly. It is a leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Treatment of lung cancer which was predominantly combination chemotherapy was initially thought to be too toxic for older patients with cancer due to their frail state. However a number of recent studies have shown that this is not necessarily true and many elderly can actually tolerate combination chemotherapy and derive just as much benefit from it as younger patients with lung cancer do. More recently it has been found that a significant proportion of lung cancer patients have tumors that harbor mutations that are targetable by molecularly targeted therapy (MTT). These targeted therapies have a much better tolerated side effect profile, hence have been used in elderly patient with lung cancer with great success. A new generation of drugs called immune checkpoint inhibitors have now come into the fray with exciting results in the second line treatment of lung cancer with a low side effect profile. A key element in deciding whether an elderly patient with lung cancer can tolerate treatment involves a detailed assessment using the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). A number of CGA and clinical factors have also been found to be able to predict chemotherapy associated toxicity. This review of lung cancer in the elderly was part of a lecture on "Practice pearls in the management of lung cancer in the elderly" presented at the SIOG Annual Meeting in Prague in November 2015.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Lobectomy for T1-2N0 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Are the Guidelines Supported?

BACKGROUND

Evidence guiding adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) use after lobectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is limited. This study evaluated the impact of AC use and tumor size on outcomes using a large, nationwide cancer database.

METHODS

The effect of AC on long-term survival among patients who underwent lobectomy for margin-negative pathologic T1-2N0M0 NSCLC in the National Cancer Data Base from 2003 to 2006 was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The specific tumor size threshold at which AC began providing benefit was estimated with multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling.

RESULTS

Overall 3,496 of 34,360 patients (10.2%) who met inclusion criteria were treated with AC, although AC use increased over time from 2003, when only 2.7% of patients with tumors less than 4 cm and 6.2% of patients with tumors of 4 cm or larger received AC. In unadjusted survival analysis, AC was associated with a significant 5-year survival benefit for patients with tumors less than 4 cm (74.3% vs 66.9%; P<.0001) and 4 cm or greater (64.8% vs 49.8%; P<.0001). In subanalyses of patients grouped by strata of 0.5-cm increments in tumor size, AC was associated with a survival advantage for tumor sizes ranging from 3.0 to 8.5 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of AC among patients with stage I NSCLC has increased over time but remains uncommon. The results of this study support current treatment guidelines that recommend AC use after lobectomy for stage I NSCLC tumors larger than 4 cm. These results also suggest that AC use is associated with superior survival for patients with tumors ranging from 3.0 to 8.5 cm in diameter.